Resolution-PC 90-35'~,' ~~
r"
; ~.
R~~,SQLiLIQN NQ, PC9b-35
~ A RE~SOI~IJTION OF T~IG ANAHEIM CI'.CX PLRNNING COMMISSION
THAT PGTITION F'O~t TtECLASS:CFI.^.AT~ON NU, 89-90-37 BE GRANTED
W~IEREAS, the Anahe.im City Planning Cummission ~7ic't receive a
verixiEd petitian for Reclassification ~or cerCair~ r~al prap~rtiy situatAd an
the City ~F :~nahPim, County of Oranga, State of California~ dosr.ribed as
f.ollows:
I,OT 28 UF TRACT N0. 1Y94, :[N THE CTTY OF ANAHEIM, AS
SHaWN ON A N,AP THERrO~' RECO~DED IN BOOIt ~$, FAGE5 1
.\ND 2 OF MISC~LLANGOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNTY.
A~,
^:
WH~REAS, the City Planning Comr~,issiqx~ aid hold a pub~ic hearizig
al: t~he Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on January '15, 1990 at Z:30 p,m.,
notir.~ of said publzc hearin~ ha.v.ing been duly givQn as required by law and in
ar,coxr]ance w.i.th the provisions of the Anaheim rtunicipal Code, Chapter 1~.U3,
ho hear and consider evidence £or and ayains~ said propased reclassiEieat:.on
and to xnvostigate and make findinqs and rec~mmand~tions in c~nnection
r,here~~ith; anc3 5aid pa~ition was continued to th~ Plar~ning Commission meetings
of January 7.9, 1990 and February 1?., 1g90; an3
WHEREhS, said Coirunissi~n, bfter due inspection, investigation
and atudy ma~e by itself and in its benal£, and after dus consideration of a.ll
e~idence and reporl:s offQred at said hearing, does find and det~rrnin~ the
following f acts:
1. T.hat the petitioner praposos reclassification of subjact
property f:om ~ho RS-7200 (ttesidential, Single-P'amily) ?,oue ta CL (Commer.Gial,
Limited) or a less intense 7one.
2. That the Anaheim Genera3 Plan designates subject property
fc,r General Commercial land uses.
3. That the proposed r~classificatzon uf subject propart,y is
ngceasary ~n6 dasirable for the orcic~rly and proper development o£ the
community.
4. That the pr~posed reclassification or subject,~roperty r~oos
not propQrly relate t.o the rosidential zon~s and their permitted iises locally
esl:ablzshed in c1o~P groximity l:a subject property and ta the zonQS az~d hheir
pexmitted u~es generally established throtighout thi3 conununity.
~291r -1- PC 90-35
. ~ <4' 1 T{r,`
,.~
,~
;,
: ,_y
,.. ;
~`~~
. :r. ~
. ~, ~
' ~ "w
5. TI-t~t no one 3ndic~ted their prosenco at said public hoarinq
in opp~sitlont and that no corresp~ndanco was r.oceivad ln opposition to
subject potition.
~L~e~-~:-QR-~.A .__~~1_IB.~~M~~~~b,_4.tlll~~.~.X_~.~(~T__~A~I3.~t That the Anaheirn
Cf.ty Planning Commission ha~ rovi~wecl the propo3a:l +:o roclassiEy subiect
pxop~rty ~ram Che RS-7200 ;~tosid~ntin7, Single-i'amily) 'lone to the C[.
(Commsrcia~, i.imited) ZonQ t-nd w.iCh ~aivers of. req~aired location of parking
area, minfmum ~tructural setback nnd r~quired improvemont of purki.ig area to
establish commorcial ofRic:e usa of a rosid~nti~sl structura on a
cecCangularly-shaped paccol of l~nci consisCing of ~pprox3mately 0.3 ~cre
located at the southweat corner at Anr..he.im Boulevarcl IItlfi Midaay Mannr, havin~
approximato frontagos oi 11~. fNOt on tk~e west side of Anahe:m Doulevard and
114 foet on ~ho south sido uf Midway Manor, ~nd further deacribed as 883
South Anaheim Boulevarci; anil doos her~b}~ approve the N~gative Declaration
upon findinq t2~at it ha~ considored the Negative Declaration taqether wi.tl~
any comments receivoti during thu p~~bli.c revinw procQSS an8 further finding on
Che ba3is o~ tho initial study and any comment:s received that there is no
substanr.~al evidQns:e thdt the~ project will have a significant effact on the
onvironment.
NO~~, THEI2EFORE, fiE IT RCSU'.VED that the Anaheim CiC,-~+ Planning
Commissian does herebj grant Petitinn for Reclassification on the basis of tha
aforemention~d findinys.
THS FOR~GOING RESOLUT.l'ON waa aclpoted aC thQ Planning C~mmission
meoti-ig ~f February 1't, 1990.
.~
~/ • ~.~_ ~'! ~ r....
-/_~.L ~ ~~t.>~-~t~. ./'(.~1 ~~<.~~i .~..-,
°----
C:3AI Rtn' ;6AN PRO TEMP~JRE ~
AtIIUiETM CITY PLANNING COMMtSSIUN
ATTEST:
~~ ~ ~~'~ ~~ ~ ,
r~~ ~~~_L'-~ ~~ / ` -~ ~ ~-'Lt..~ ;L.
SECRETARY, n~JhHE~t~t r;ITY P!!~!tNIN~~yCOt1!1-55I0~1
_2..
PC 9a-35
~<. .
-- . .;~:
n~.~7cP'~'7viF{ '~`,. . . i ., . . ... ~ ~ ~ - ~ . . .
~~ - ~ . . , . . ~ . . . . . ~ ~ . . , . . ~ , ~ .. ~~',~'+..,iS~yy~p~
. • . , ~{i.
~r .. . ~ ~1'~~
i
ST.ATE OE CALIFU$NIA )
' ` ~COUNTX OF OF2AtIGg ) ss.
C2T1' OF ANAHF.IM )
i. Btlith L, Flt,rri
Commi3;~i~n, d~ hereby certifj~ t;, Secratary of tho Anaheim CiL•y Plbuning
~hat th
e for~going re~o7ution was gagsocl and
adopted at a mooting of the Ar~alxeim ~~r.y Plt~nning Cortimis
i
12. 1990 by the fo.llowinq v~te s
on tield on Fabruxry~
of tho membQrs thereof;
~Y=%Ss COMMISSIONERS: tJOUAS, AOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS, NELLYER,
NOEu: •'"~GSSE,
CUtYLtitISSZONERS: NONt: MC N-JRN~Y
ABSENTs GQI~•SISSIONER5t HERBST
~
`~ /f IN WITNESS Wf~EREOI',
af ~-~~. 1990.
z have hereur.ko ~et my t~and this ~Lf~.
day
~f ~~J+! , .
~
~''
-
r-.~;
____/~ •-_ ?-'~-~G-.-
,
SE~RE111RY, ANAf(EItd CTTY PLANNING COMMISSION
~~3 PC 90-35
~
~