Resolution-PC 90-38~ ~ .. .. . . , . i.,.^.~{
i ll~{ II~! ! +' ~
, _ - , . i ~~"~r~°kti~
. „~~,
~,i; r.w...
;i:.
;
R~~.4~V~ION NOa p~~.3~
~ A RESOLUt:IpN ~F TKE ANNiEIM C1'T'~ PL
' THAT P~TZTICN FpR nECLASSTFICATIpN ~a ~NING COMMTS5IOP7
89-g~-~10 H~ DENIED
verified WHER~A.S, the Anahei.m Citx Flannin
F~lition f.or Roclassific~ ~ ~pmmission d3,d receic-~ ~
tho City oE An~h~im ~-tion for certain real
tol'lows: ~ County of Qrange. S~ate o~ px~~Per~y situat;ec~ i2i
California, descr.ibad ~S
LOT 6 Ol 7.`HE GRESSWELL SUBDIVZSIQ~I~
0~ OR~rr. STATE ~JF CAL'lFORNIA xN TH~ CZT~ nF ~~
`~' OF bfTSCELLANEOUS ~ AS PER MAP RECORDED II3 BO K~ 6~UNTy
SAZ~ CUUNTY, LYING WITH N~TE 7~aT:[VE PAFCEI; ~F ~HE CqUNTY ~tECpRAER AOF
~-P N0• R8-153
i4HEREAS, the Citv k~lanr~in
~t the Ci.vi.c Ce•ril;er in the Cit g C°~"ission did hold a
no~ice of said public hearin y°~ Anaheim on Fehruar , public haaring
~ccorda:~.~e with ~ h~vixlg been dul ~' Z`• 1990 at 1:30 ~,m, ~
the pravisions Y qiv~n as requireci b~•
to hear and consider eviden~Q for and againsL• sa.id j law nnd in
of the Anaheim Municipal ~pde~ ~haptQx 1F~,03
and L•o invo:~~iaate and m~ka findin s
therewith• Pzopusod reclassifi.cat,ion
. anci g t~nd recommendations :in connection
aila ~tu3 WFIEREAg, sald Com,mission
y mac7e by itself and in its behalf ~~~r dtie inspection, inve,^,t~.gr3tion
evidence and repurts cffered ~t . and aFter due consideration of ala.
following F~chs; said h•aaring, dQ~s £ind and determine the
l. Tr.a~ t:~e
px°pert~' Frpm the RM_12~0 p~titioner proposes reclassificaL•fon
(ResidQntial (ResidenL•ial, Multiple-Famil °F sub]QCt
. Multiple-Faml.ilY? Z~n~. Y) Zone to
~h~ RM-3000
Eor Medi 2' r`~at t}1e Anaheim Ceneral Plar. des5qnates subject ro er
~ n~nSi~Y F;esidential 1~nd uses,
~ P ty
not n~cessar 3' That the proposRd reclassif;lcztion o~
Y nor desirable for the orderl , Juli7ect ro erty is
cnmmunity. y an~. proper develop Qn p of
the
~~ Tha~ ~hQ Proposed reclassific~,*.•
not rroPerly relate to tho zones an~i lon ~f subject r~
. ~ P
in clo„e proximir~, to sub'ect ~h~ir ermzttaa u,^,ss locaZlp per~y d~eS
uses gerierally establ.ished ~hro gt~out rth~ Co~un tye zO2•e~ and th~ix srablishetl
permikted
t:~at ~~ ~hdt ~hP proposed recl.;~ssificalicn
xt, wouid he spoL zon3.ng, xs denied on the basis
].i94r
-1-
.~ _ . .
li. ?hat no one ir~dicaeod th~ir preaence ut snid public hF,aring
.tn npposition; and th~+t r~o corr.ospondencH was recaiveA in opposiL•lon ta
~ubject petition.
C. slt~~4t?Il~._~N~~~N~N;~}~.It.__S~II.~a~•.~~X_._AG~ ~~p.l.~C~: The Y.lenning
UirecL•or or his a~.~tho: izeti r.opreson~Ative has dr.t;ermin~d t:ht-: t;he pi•oQoaed
praject falls ,~ithin rbo definiti4n of Categorica.l Exempt3ans, Cl$98 a, as
clofinocl in r_he St~-to EIR Guidolinos aud is, thexe~oro, cat,egorically ex~mpt
fro;n tha roq~ilrement to prepare an EIF.
N4W, TFJ~1tGFORE, FiE IT RESOLVEb that the Anahe.fm C.ity f~lannfnq
Commission doos hereby deny Pe~ition for Recl~ssificatiUn on the basis of the
~+f~renantianed fanding;;.
ThE; F~REGUIl~G RESOLIJTION wns adoptad ~t tho Planning Commf.ssion
mQOtinq oC E'ebruary 12, 1990.
_~,~/ ~ l` , ' ~ ,'J~l,` "~ ( .i- ~.~.~
CHAJRWO~t PRO TEMPqRE, ~ ~-••-~~~~
I~NAHEIM CI?'Y PI.ANNING COMMISSIOPI
AT~ES~: C ~^' • ~ / / .
_ _ ~ ;'~~ ~
.~_ ~. `~ ~-~.~
SLCRETARY, ANAHEIN. CITY PLI~Ni1ING COl4tISSION
ST?,TE OF CALIFQP.t71A )
COUh'TY OF CRANGE ) ns,
CITY OF ANAFiEIM )
I, EdiT.h i.. }iarri;,, S~cretary oL tho Anahetm City Plannfnq
Cort~mission, do hereby certiiy thac the foreqoing resolution was Qassefi a,ul
odopCed at a meetinq of the An~hoim City Plenning Commission held oa Yebruary
12, 1990 by the folloWing v~tA o: thq members ~:horoof:
11YESs COt~P4ISSI0NFRS: t30U11S, ROYDSxUt1, YELDHAUS. NBGLYLR,
MESSE, NC ~UkiJ~Y
HOESs COMWISSiONER~: NONE
ABSEtI`I': COhQrfISS10l7~RS: fiF.RBST
r• IN WlxtiESS WI,F,REOF, I have }-,ereunto sek mp hand this =~~~ d~,Y
, of ..~G~ l/ . 1990. --•
l ! (~, / ,
_._ ..-----~~.1.~~_~_,__;_ _~ __ ~~~~.-~.__~._
SF:CRE2'114tY, Ailt~}{~TM CI'f PLANtiINf; COMMI5SIUH
°z" f'C 90-39