Resolution-PC 90-41. ,,' +'A'•
R '~S .Q~L~_T_34~L N~r.P~.4..2-4.?~
~.cWrrq
1
A RESOLU'xION OF TI~TF ANl~HE:ibi GITY PLANNING CUNB~IrSSION
THAT PFTTTION FOR VA~2IANCE N0. 40?.~ FiE GRIINTED
WKERr~AS, th~ An~h~im Cit~- Planning C.ommiss3.on did receive a
veri£ied Petition ~or 'Vxxian~e Lor certain real property situ~.te~ ~.n the City
oP Anarieim, Couri':y of Orar.ge, Stat~ of Califo~ni~, d~scri~ied as follows:
LOT 24 OF TRACT 8465 AS P~R MAP THEREOF RECORDED TN
BOOK ~13, k'AGES 4£3, 49 AND 50 OF t~ISCELLANF~UUS MAPS
IN THr OFEICE OF THL. RECORDER AF SAID COL'N'PY.
C4H~REAS, i:he CaCy Pla:nning Commiss~.on did hold a publir. hearing
at the Civic Cent~rr in tho Ciry of Ar~nhe:m on February 1'l, 1990, at 1:30 p.m. ,
notice of saiii publia he~rinq ha~ring b~en diily given as required by law and in
accordance wiLh the pravisions of the Rn3heim Munzcipal Code, ~hs~pter 18.03,
to h~ar and con~id~r evidence for and against said propo:;e~< <yariance and to
invostigate and make findings and rkcommeridations in connection tY:arawit2~; and
WHFREAS, said Commission, aftQr clue inbpection, inve,stigation
an~ study made by itsolP and in i.ts behalf, and after aue cons.ideration or all
evi.dence and reports offered at said hearing, does ~ind and determine the
fol].nwing facts:
l. That the pQtitioner requcsts waiver of ttie following to
retain a grcund-mo~a~zted satellzte dish:
SE~TIQN 1~~4,042~Q~4 - i'__r~hit~i~,.-~d~r.ound-mounsgd 2c{~.i•Pmen~.
(n~gro,•-n~=mg~nt.~+~,_~a~~llite di~Y}~ permitred in t1iQ
Sceni.c Corridor Overlt~y Zone; .~n_ e 1QVfg~4 diameter
grour~d~*iountg~l ~lish ~xisting)
2. That the above-mentionod ~Waiver is hereby grantod on the
basis that the ~atrt'•.ite dish shall bo lowerod and completely screenec] from
vit~w and that ~here are agecial circumstances applicab'le ~o ~1~~ pro~erty such
as size, shape, topoqraphy, loca~ion and surroundings .+2~ich do nor apply to
ocher iclentically zon~d property in the same vicinit-y; and that stx~ic:t
Hpplicatior of ths Zuning Code dfprives the proporGy ot ~rfvileqes enjoyed by
o'~hor propertios in tl~e ident.ical zoiie and clascification in the ~~:.:inity.
3. Ttiat there are oxc~ptional or extranrai.nary circumstances
or conditions applicable to L-ho property invo~ved or to the inten~a3 ~sa of
ths property that do not apply gonerally to the property ar class of use in
thn same vicinii:y and zone.
4. That the requNStad var!:+nce is necessar;~ for the
pr~servation and enjoyment of a substaiitial proper.ty right possessed bl other
proporty in the sacn~ vieinity aad zone~ and cleniad to the proparty in question.
1297r ••1- PC 90-41
~~ . ,
,~'~
r,:
5. ThaC the reguested variance will nat be mat~rielly
dotrzmerital to the public w~lfare or i.~ijurious to tho pxop~rky or improvements
in au::h vicinity ur.d xonr~ in which Chc~ proporty j,y ,lpr,~~@d,
6. Thak no one indic.z~ted their pre~ence at s~id p,iblic hearing
in opposition; and that no cor.re3pondencc~ wa3 rece3vecl in opposiL•ion to
subject ~atition.
AL~F,QRN]:A Ey:I~NAl~;NTAL QUAI,ITX A~~' I'INBI~: Tha P7.anning
Direr.tor or his authorized rEpresentaLive has aatQrmined that tho ~Sroposed
project fA~ls w.ithi~ the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 5, as
defined in the State~ EIF2 Gixidolinss and is, thrzrafore, cateqorically Axempt
£r.c~m thc~ rQquirement ta prop~re an E2F;,
NOh', THEREFORE, }3E IT RESOLVED that tlie Auaheim City ~lanniny
Commission does hereby grant• subject Petitiou xor Variance, upon ~k~e
fol:towinq conditions which are hereby found to be ,.. necessary pr~requ.isito to
the proposed use of tt:~r subjeet property in order to presarve the safety ~nd
geziaral welfare of tlxe C.itizens or". th~ City of Anaheim:
1. * ~hat plans sha11 be submitt~d to the Building Div.ision showinq
c~mpliance with tkie minimum standar.ds of the Czty of Anaheim, xncludirig
l•he Uniform Buildinq, Electrical, Mschanical and Fire Codes as adopted
by the C9.r,y oP Anaheim. ThP appropri~te permits shsll be ~btained f~r
any nac~ssary work.
2. T1iat subjec~ proparty shall be developed substantially in accordance.
with plans and specif.zcations ~ubmitted to tYie City ot An;aheim by tho
petitioner and w:hic`+ plnns are on file with the P2annix~g Dep~rtment
marked Exti~bit Nos. 1; provided, IiowQVer, t:hat the s~tellitP dish sh~ll
be ].owered. ar~d t~dditianal screening sha11 be provid~cl izi ortler that it
be comple:e].y hid~3en from view.
3, 'Plist Condition 27os. 1 and 2, above-mQntioned, shaYl be completed within
a peri~d of sixty (6Q) days From the date of' this resolution.
4. * That approval of this app]ica+tion conatitut2s approval of the propoaed
requQSt only to the extenL• tY~at: it comk~] ies with the .Anahc~im Municipal
Zoning Code and any other a~;plicable City, State anCl Federal
regulations. Approval does not inc~ud~ any action or findings as to
camp~iance uL~ approval of the request regarding any oth~r applicable
ordinance, regula~.ion or requiremer:t. Conditians ma*:ked with an
asterisk (*) are raquirecl by eskabliahed laws, cudes, regulat~ons and
agreements and are not sut~jer,t to neqotiatinn.
BE IT FURTHGR RESOLVED r_;~~t ttic~ Anahoim City Pl~nning Commission does
hereby find and cleter.mine ~hat adoptiun af ~:his Resolution is sxpres~ly
predicated upon applican~c's campliance with gach and all ot' ttie cnnd3.tions
hereinabove set forth. Shou.id any such conc~itions, or any part thereof, be
declareQ invali.d or unenforceable by the final judgment of any courr. of
compeL•er..t jur3.sdicL•iur~, then this [tesolution, and any appro•~a1s herain
contained, sha~1 be deemed null and void.
-Z-
FC 90-41
v_,.~... ~. ,
I Y~ • ~
~~!w~!',,.,_, ......_. _.. . . .. . :,c ,y.
. ..,, ,r•"^• . ~ . i..l
~1
THE FORE;GOING RESOLUTION was adoptad at ~he Planninq Commisyion
mee ting of Februar.y ll, 1990.
r~ . % ~ ,,~ ,~ /,> .,y__._
f_,~ ,j~ .
/:, ~~t c.a~~/--~%'~-~r 4,'`i~=~~e(.c..~~..~ ~~.
CHAIRI~~MAN PRO T~MFOI~',E7~~
ANAHF.IM CITY PLAT;NTNG COMMISSTON
T~
~r ,
;, ;
`,~
~
71TTEST:
`~ ~..~ y~' ~ __.__._--
SECRETARY, ANAHF.IM CITY PLANNING COI~SMISSTON
STA.TE GF CAL,Tk'ORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CI'TY GF ANAHEIM )
I, ~d~th. L, Harris, Secretary of the Anal~Qim C.ik:y Plenning
Corr.mission, d~ hereby certify that the foreguinq r~solutic~n was passed and
adop~ed at a mQetxng of t:he Anaheim City Planning Commi~sion held on
r'e.bruary 12, 1990 by the ~ollowi;~g vote ot~ r.he members thereof:
AYE5s COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BnYDSTUN, FrLDHA(J5, HELLYEIt~
MESSE, MC IIURNEY
NOE5; COMMT~SIONE~tS: NONE
ABcENT: COMMl55IONERS: HERBST
J IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have here~anto set my hand tY~is ~.~~-~ day
of •~ 1990.
~ ~n ~ ~ ~
. ~- -{ ~~~~ '/~.~_~..r -Q~
~u'ECR~,TARY, A.NAHEIDS CI'TY FLANDIING i:OMMISSION
-3-
PC 90-41
., {
' _~;
;r
:'~ ~