Resolution-PC 90-46[ZE~OLi~T~Ott_NU,_ PC9Q: Qfi
A RL•'SUf UTION OE• THE ANA}IEIM CITY PI,ANNING CUM'rtI5SI027
'fHAT YETITION F~it VARIA.NCF. N0. 4p19 B~ UCNTED
F7FIEFtEAS, tho Anah~im C.iCy F~lanninr~ Cnmm,ssion did recelve t~ varifi~rd
E'~tition Eor Variancc for certain ro71 propQrty situated in tha Cit.y of
Anahein, C:ounty uf. Orcing~, ~taCc~ of Calil'qrnia descrl~beci as:
LOT 7 OF TEtACT N0. 15G1), AS PER MAi~ RECORDED IN BUOK
Q5. °AGB 46 OP MISCEI,I.ANEJUS MAYS, IN TFiF. OFrICE OF
'"IiE CUUNTY RF.CQRUF.R OC SAIJ COUN~Y.
~~1HERE,~i, the City Plaririi•.ig Commission d.id y~oia a~ublic heariny at
the C.',vic CenCor .in ~he City nf An~he~im on „anuary 3, 1990, ~t 1:30 p,m.,
nor.ic~, of :-a.id pubSic hearing hlving bevn du:y given a~ requ;rFd by :aw and iu
~ccordanco with r.he provisions c,f r.t~e Anaheim Municipal Code, ChaptQr 18.0?,
to h~aar and consider evidencc, f~~r ~nd aqainst said proposed var.iance and to
investigat~ and mako find.ings aacl recommcndations .in connocti~n thFrewitti; and
l-ha'c said hearing was conr.inu~d to the :n~eting c~E E'ebruary 26, 7990.
WEfEREAS, sai~ Commissir~n, aftei• iiue inspection, investigation ~n~9
study made by itself and in it~; behalf, ar~~3 at'ter due consicieration of a.11
evidence and reports offerec? at said hea:iny, d~es fir:d and determine the
fcllcwing far.ts:
1. Th~t lhe petit:oner requests waiver of the follo~rinq r.o r~~~ir~ a
379 sq.fr, accessor.y livin~ quartUrs:
$F~T~QN 1Qil_ti_,Q3Q,.QZQ_ - Minimym lQt_s.iz~_fqr a~.~_~s~pr~!_li-~in~_gp31.~r~.
(`~~.._~4S!~~.f_C,. required: ~,416
~q,_,f~,, existfnq)
2. Tt~:.it t}:e above-ment:ions~d waiver. is r~ereby iienied ~n t:he basis
that the cooking unit is illegal and that Code requires ~ lut 3ize of 1 acre
(4~,560 :yquare f.eet) in order Lo maintai» ac;ressory Iiving ctuarters (or
serv~nl's q~aarters) with or. without kitchen facil.ttzes, provi~3ed that said
q~iarters be used only by persc;ns ~mployed on the premise:~ and are not usod for
commercial purposes; and. that s~+bmitt.ed plans indicate the lot size is on.ly
0.21 acre (9,q16 square feet); that thpre ArP r.o special circum~kancea
appiicablQ tu the propert~ ;;uch a~ siz~, ~t~ape, topography or ~urroundings,
uhich do not app3.y to other identically zonud propec•t.iQS ir. the viciniLyf and
Chat strict applir.atio:~ of r_he 7.o~iinq ~:ode does not deprive thE pcopPrty ot
privi2eges enjoyed by othr_r prop~rties in idE~nt:ical :.on.inq classiflcc~tfon in
t1~e vjcinity.
3. That r,he reque~~ed vari~nce is herF;by denied on the basis that
it wou.ld set an un~lesirable precede»t .in L•h~2 RS-IOUQ zone Eor rental units;
and th~r, approval was ~riginally ~qiven for a rumpur, room, wikh a brrh and
stuYayc area to be u~QQ as an addition tu th~ cxistinq hom~, Hnc7 iC wars not
su~spose to b~ used as a aeparar.e liviny quarters.
4. That ~hero ~~re no excpptional or extrpordSnary circtunst~n~ea ac
conc~.irions ~ppi icabla ta thc properCy involvad r,c l•o ehe int~nc'ftcl ur~o of the
properCy thaC do nor, ~pply qeneral:l t~ thc pro~erty or claas of ~ase in thA
aar~e vicinity and zor-o.
1308r -1- PC90-46
5. Th~t the requeaCe~ v:~riance is not necnssary :Eor the
pc~aservation and enjoyment of tt subsk,antial prop~r~y right posaessed by othdr
propertx :in the sttme vicinitj and r.one, ~+nd dar.ied to tho propRrty in question.
6. That tho req,,-a3t~cl varianco will bH marer.iall.5- detr.iroontal to
the Yublic walcar~ or injurious t~ tha ~r.o~orty or improv~m~nts in ~uch
vicinity ancl zonci i~- wh.ich the prop-~xty is loc~-t~d.
7. Th7r therc w~re 6 persons ind.xc~ting cheir presenc~ at naid
~ubtic heari~ig tn oppositi.on; tkiat n potir,.ion con!.a3.ziing 28 siqnatures crRs
racei.vod i.n o~.posirion to sub;ect petition; ~r.d that thQZe were 7 pQrsons
pres~nt in fa~~or oE kt-e ~+ropnsal.
~1~T~1TF'QRNI_~___ FivVIROt~Et~TAC._QUAGITY _~~(;~_ FIND~~C: The blanning
Cirector ~r his authorizocl representative has deter.mineci that thQ Qr~posecl
pr~ject fal,s within the def.iniCion of L'ateqorical Examptions, Clasr~ 3, as
defineci in thQ StatQ EIR GuidelinQS anc3 is, tliorofore, categarically ex~mpt:
from thQ roquiremont to prepare an EIR.
l1~W, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOTVEU that thp Anaheim ~ity P1an~.iing
Carnmission doES iiereby deny s~.~bject f~r,t~.tion for Variance on tl~e basis of khe
aiore~~~entioned findinqs.
THE FORGGCItiG RESOL(tTTGti was adoQt~d uf_ the Plannir~g Conrr.issioz~
meetinq of February 7b, 1~190. ,~ ,~ .
-- ' ' ~ ~ %
. .,:_:._:._..
\~,~' ~i c. . '.,~ _ ~ : - ,~
= r_~_~.~. .~ ~z-...!---- ~--
CFiAift:dAtl, At AFiE:it CITY PLANNINr, COMMISSION
ATTEST:
.i
~
v// ,,/
.~._..---__C,,,~~__4%'"=_ .~_~_~`~.Z:.s~.,c.------___,.
SECRETANY, 1,IvAHE:Dt CITY YL)~21NING C0~'~SISSION
BTATE OF CALIFOFNI.~ )
COUNTY OF ORAtIGE ) s~.
CTTY OF ANAIiEI:N )
I, F.dith L. H~icris, Secretary ot rho Anaheim Ciky Plann.inq
Commission, do hereby cerr_ify th~t tt,c fureyoing resolution was pasAQd and
adopted at a neeti.ng of th~ Ar,ahcim Cil•y Pl~nni.ng ~o-runissinu held on February
2fi, 1990, by the (ollowinq vote of the mnmbers thereof:
AYES: CvMQyilS.^~IOt7:,RS: Ei0li,1S, BOYUSTUt7, FELDF~At~S, Hc~i$ST, MC HUP,NEY
iJOES: (;Oh4~1lSSIQ;IERS: EiE;t [,yER
AaSEC7T: r~t.~•,ISStONERS: t~sESSf:
Ii~ WITNE:SS 4~}fERF.OF, I have hr.reuntu se~ r,~y hand this -~G~- c;ay of
~ l~<<A.~.v~~ , l_99~).
r"
' 1~
-.--._ ..__.....r_ ~~: _-~._~v __~'' _-_ ~~~~,~.~~.: _.__
5F~F:~x'ARY, AtJ1~flEItd PJ.AP1iJTNG CC>LMISSIplt
'Z- PC90-46