Resolution-PC 90-78~,~~;,~~~,
~
1i~9~~Ix~L~?? N~~_~2~~Z~
A RESOLUTI()N OF TFiC ANAHETM CZTY PLANNING COMMJSSION
THAT PETITTON i'OR COtdDITIONAI, USL" PERMIT r10. 3?.50 EiE G~tANTED
WEiERCAS, thQ Anaheim City P1~ann3ng Commission d.i.d racoivo a veri~ied
~et~r.ion for Cun~3itional Use Perm3.t fnr ~ortain rc~a7. pr.oparLy si-:uated in the
City oE Anah~im, CounLy ef Orange, St:aL•e of California, described ~s:
THAT PORTION OE TH3 SULISHWEST QUA.Ft'.l'ER Ob' THE
SO(1THWEST QLJAI2TER ~JF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP ~ SOUTH,
RANCE 1~ WEST, IPt TFiE FANCTiO SA.Pi JUAN CAJON DF S~1NTA
AN1, AS SHOWN QN A MAP FECORI)Eb IN AOOK 51, PAGF 10
OF MISCELLAN~UU;~ MAPS, RGCORD5 OL ORANGE COLiN'rY,
CALII'QRI3IA, DrSCRIBE~ AS FOLL0~9S:
B~GItdNING AT 'PfiE POTNT OF It1TERSECTION OF THE
CENTLRLTNE Oi' TH~ STATF HIGTiWAY AS IT E7fiISxED ON
OCxOBFR 9, 1926 W:[TH T.HE SOUTcIi;ASTERLY LI2JE OE THE
T12ACT OI' LAND FORMERLY owz~r•.n AY ALVA E. FiARGROVE AND
ELIZAFiGTH HARG:tGVE, SAID POIN'i BEtNG SOUTEi 45 DEG.
WEST 722.10 FEF.T FROM A YOINT 2$f3.3~ I'EET WEST OF THE
NORTHEAST COFNER Oc THE SOUTHWEST QUARTF.R UE' THE
SOUTE~WEST QUARTER OE SAID SCC'_~ON 23; THENCF
NORTHWk:STERLY ALONG SAID CENTGRI.I~JG OF TfiE STATE
HIGFiWAY 211 F~ET; T:1F'NCE NORTEI 45 nEG. ~AST 257.75
FE~'~; ~HENCC SOUTH;.ASTERLY 7.11 ~'E~T, D:ORE OR LESS TO
A POZNT IN SAIU SOUTFiEASTERL'1 LII3E OF ZHE LAND
FORt~IERLY OWNEU BY HARGROVC 273.5 FE~T NOkTH 45 DEG.
E:AST OF TTiE P()I'.~T OE' Bl:G7NI~ING; THENCF SOUTH ~15 DEG.
WEST 273.5 F~ET ALONG SAIL~ LINE TO THF F'OZNT
Fi~:GINiIING .
WHGRE~~S, the City Plannir~g Comnission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Cenh~r i.n the ~il~~ Uf anaYi~im ou March 26, 199C ak 1:30 p.m., no'tice
of said publ.ic hearinc~ tiaving been clu?.l qiven as roquired by law anci in
accordar.ce witYi r,he provisions ot th~ Anaheim Municipal Code, Chupter 18.03,
lo hear and consider ovidence Eor an~9 against said proposed conditional use
pe~-mit ancl to invostigate arid make finclinc~s and recommendations i.n conneetior-
therewith; and
WFiEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and i-i it5 LehalE, an.~i ~after due consideration of all
evidence an9 report~ offez•ed at said hearing, does f.ind and determine the
iollowing tacts:
1. That -tti ~~ner requests approval of. a conditional us~ permit
under author i.ty of Cocle Se~'• ~~ 18 .46. ~ 50. (130 tn pormit ar. amusemenr (Go-Kart)
facility.
2. That t}~a prer~rud use .i:; h~reby grantec3 for a heriod nf thzee
(3) years, to ~xri:~ on March 2b, 1993.
135Hr -1- PC90-76
.7 -••Rfli!:.
3. Tliat ~lle proposed usr~ wi1.l no~ adver.sQly nELdct the acljaining
land use~:~ ~~nd the growth and develorment of the area in wh_ch it is proposed
to bc locateJ.
4. Th~t t.h~ size and shapa of the site proposod L•or the use is
aciequat;e to allow ttie tu11 developmen~ ol: tki9 pro}~os~d use in a mar.ner not
detrimental to rhe parti.cular area :ior tc the peacc~, health, safety and
general welfare o.f l:he Citizens oL- rhe (;ity o£ Anaheim.
5. 'Ctiat: trie gr~nting o.f t2ie C~nditioiial LTSe Permit under t;ho
conditipris imp~sed, i.f any, o~ill not be det.r: menY.al to the peace, health,
safa~y and goneral welfare of the Cih.izens of i;ho City of Anaheim.
G. That tlie tr~L-£ic generated by l•hE proposed use will noh. imposa
an undue bti:rder~ up~n th~ at~r~ets ancl highways designed aiid improved to carry
the Craffzc xn the area.
7. That no one indicated l:lleir presenre at said public hearing in
opposit:i.on; and thaL• no correspondence vras ra~~cived i» oppositiori to the
subject ~etition.
C'AGTF RNIA ENVIi20PIMENTAL, .Q_UAi,1TY _ ACT rINDTP7G: That the Anahei:~i
City Planning Comma.ssion has reviewed the proposal to est~hlisli an amusemenr
(Go-KarC) f~cility an a rectangularly-shaped parcel of laz~d r.onsisL-ing of
approximatQly 0.99 ~cre liaving a frontage of approximataly 211 feet on tha
northeast side ot Anaheim Boulevard, having a maximum ~~ept.Y~ of approximately
205 fQet and beino located ap~~r.oximately 1220 f.eet north af the canterline of
CZ~udina Way and furthpr des.r,ribed as 1700 South AYiaheim Boulevard; and does
tiereby approve the Negative Declara~ion upon fi.nding that iL- txas cons3.dered
the Negative Doclaration together with any ccmments received during the
nub.lic review proc~~ss and furthE~r finding on ~.he basis of the initial s*udy
and any comments roceivecl that ~here .is n4 substaziLial evidence that the
~rojecY. wi11 have a signifir.ant ei`fect on L-he envi.ronment.
~ NOW, TH~REFORG, f3E TT R~SOLVED khat the Anaha.im City P'l~nning
Commission dn~s hereby gr;~nt subj~~ct PF~it?on for Conditional Use Parmit,
up~n the Lullvkiny conditions which are hereby found to be ~ ner.t~ssary
prereqaisite tn the prnposed use of the subject pro~,erty in order ~o preserye
the saf•ery ar.d general welfare oP the Citizens o.E thQ CiL-y oi' Analioim:
1.* That the legal owner of sui~ject proporty sh,~ll irrevocably offc~r to
cicdicatQ to the City ot: Anat~eim a strip of .lanii fifty (50) feet in wicith
; frorn the c;eciterli.ne of the stree~ alang Anaheim Boulevard for streek
' widening purposes.
~,
2. That the pekitioner shall subrnit !'our (4) set~s of plans to the Orange
County Hea1t-h Departmer,t; and, a.fter apgroval, sha1.1 suUmiL- ~.hree (3) of
Chose iour star.ped "approvecl" s~~s to tlie City of Anah~im Fire
Department for xevi~w and apprr~val of the installati~:i of Che
undergroiind gas tanY..
3. Tha~ currentlp servic~d £ire exhinguis}iQrs sha1Y be prov.ided w.i.thin
sever.ty t5ve (75) txavel feet of the Lueling area.
A.* That pr.ior t~~ issuance of a bui.lding permir, the app:opriate traffic
s.ignal as3essment fee sha11 be paid ta th~ C.ity of Anaheim in an amount
as established by City Couucil res~lution.
-~- PC90-70
:.~,,
5.* That pursuant to Chapter 17.31 "~idaiL-aonal d~ve].opment faes - Anaheim
St8Clium '$'txsJ.ne38 Center of the Ar~aheirn Muniaipal Code, a dove:lopment
fee for the Anari~im Sl:aclaum Fiusiness Cenr.er sha11 be ~aid ~o the City of
Anaheim in an amounti as determi.ned by the City Caunr,il.
6.k That pursuant t:o ChGptex• 17.30 "int~rim dsvelaprnont EQbs - Anahoim
6usinPSS Center" ol`. ~he Anaheirn Muni.cipal Code, a developrriant fe~ for
the AnaYieim Stad.ium Business Cenrsr sht~11 be paid to tlie Ciry of Anahoim
in an amount as det;Prmined by thQ City Council.
7. That the existing ~nost north~xly driveway on An~heim Aaulevard shall b~s
retii~ovecl aiicl replaced with standard curb, gut~er, sidewalk and
landscapiny.
$,* That plans shall be submitted to ~hQ City Traf£ic Eiigineer for h~s
re~~iew and approval ahowing conEormance with Engineering Standard Pl~,n
~ps, 43ti and 6U2 pertaininn to parking standards. Subject property
sllall therr-.uZ~on be developed anft maii~tained in conformauce with said
1~'1 an~ .
~ ~ 9. That the dri~•eway on Anaho.im IIoulevard sha11 be cor.structed with iifteen
(15) Foat r~dius curb returxis as required by t:he City Sngineer in
con.Eormanco wiL•h Engineering Standard No. 137.
10. ~ That trash storag~ areas sha'1J. be provided ancl maintai:ied in a location
acceptable to thc Street DSaint•ez:ance and San:itation Division and in
accord~nce with approved plans on~ file with sai.d Aivision. 5uch
informatinn sl~all be specifically stiuwn :~n ths plans submitted for
buildinq permits.
11.. That a fee f.or st;re~t tr~~e pu.rposes shall be p~iifl to rhe City' of Anaheim
based on length of streeC fronL-ac~e along Anaheim BoulQVard in an amount
as establ.ishecl by City C~~unci]. resolut.ion.
12.* Ttiat prior to issuance ot a buildin.g permiL, the Stadium Ar.ea water
E~cilitie~ fee3 and/or. advances shall be pai.l to ttze Piak~r Enqineerang
Division in accordance with Fule 15D of the Ware:r Utility' Rakes, Rul.es
and Requlations.
13.* '1'hat all air conditioning facilities and otY:ar roof and c~round maunterl
ec{uipmQnt shall ~ae ~roper.ly shielded from view. Such informaticzi sha11
specifical7•Y bR sirxrwn on th4 plans submitted for buildinq permiLs.
14. That pr.ior to t:he r_ommencernent ~f 'the activity authori2efl under ~chis
rosolution, or pri~r tu L•he time t:hat a building permit is issued, or
within a period ot ninet}• (9~) days from the date of this re~o~ut.ion,
whichever occurs L•irst, the 'legal owner(s) of subject propertcy shall
executo aiiu recorcl ~n unsubordinated coveiiazit in a form apprAVed by the
City ~htoz'nc~y's Otfice wherein such owner(s) n~ree not to contost the
formation of any asaessment distr.ict(~) which m~y hereattor be formed
pursuant to tl~e provisions of Develepment Agroement No. 03-01 betweQx~
~he City of Anaheim and Anaheim Stadium Associates, which disi:rict(sj
~ould include such legal groperty owner'~ propQrty.
-3- PC9U-'!8
~rti.,~` ~
15. That the pr~pr~sal srall comply with a7.]. signiug roquiruments of the CH
"C~mmercial, Heavy" 7one, unlests a variaYicQ a.Llowi~ng sign wa.ivors is
a~aprovecl by the City Council, Planning Commission or Z~ning
~dminist,rator.
16. That ariy freestanding sic~n an suY~joct property shall be a monumenl- type
nut exceadinq four (~] ).feet. in hPigh* t~ncl stiall be subjecY. tc the review
and upprov~l of the City TrafFic Engineer, nr.ior to issuar.ce, o£ a siqn
permii:, to verify adequake 1inQS-of-sie~ht.
17,* That ~he on-site landsr,aping and irrigatiari system shall be refurbished
and rr,ainta3.nad ixi compliance with City standards,
].8. That th~ parking arca adjacent to Anaheim Boulevard shal] bo scr.eenod
from vie~v by a minzmum 1:ive i 5) f:oot wide f'u'lly landscaped and irrigated
~lanter arQa. Such ir_formakion shall bo speci.fically shown on th.e plans
submitted for building pormit.s.
19. That l-.!~is conditional use permit i;: grantc~d far.• a perior~ of (3) years,
to expi.ra on March ~6.. 1993.
20. T.hat pr.iar to installation of more than Four (4) arcade devices, an
Arcade PermiC shel.l be applied for an3 approved subjQCt to Municipal
Code Chapter 4.1~ "Amusemenl Devir.es".
23. T.hat subject pro~erty shall be developed substant.ially in accarcl2n~e
with p.lans and speci~ications submitted to the City oL• Anaheim by ~he
peta.tioner and which plans are on iile with the Plaiininr~ DeQartiaent
markHCi Fxhiba.t rros. 1 throL:gh 3.
22, That prior to commencr.ment of
z•esoluti.c,n, or pr.ior. to i~suance
periccl of one (1) year from the
or,curs first, C.ondit:ion Nus. 1, 2,
above-mentioned, nhali be complie6
complete said conditions may be
18.0~.090 oE the Anaheim Municxpal
the activity autharized by this
of a buildinq permit, or. within a
date of th.is resoluL-ion, whi~hevor
4. 5, 6, 0, 10 through 13, and ].8,
with. ~}:tensiona for f:urther. ~ime to
granted in ac:coriiance wiL•h Section
Cade.
23. Tha~ Qriqr ta the cominencement ot the ac~ivity suthorized by this
resol;~t;i.on or f.inal building and zon.ing inspecti~ns, whichever occurs
Cirst, Conclition DI~s. 3, 7, 9, 17 anci 21, abave-rnentioned, shall be
compiied wit~.
24.* That ~pproval ~f this 3pplication c~nstitut:es approval of the px•oposad
requesL• only to the extent that it complf es with the Anaheim Municipal.
7oning Code and any other applicable C.ity, State anti Federal
regulat?.ons. Appr~val does not include ariy ac~ion or findings as to
compliar~.ce ur approval of tha request regarr3ing anx ot.her applicable
ordinance, rQgulation ar requirement~ Conditions mar;ced with an
asterisk (*) are required hY ~stablished l~ws, codes, regularions and
agreement~ and are nat subjecl: to nec~otiatian.
-`~- PC90-78
,_ ,, ~
,, , ..;
,, . , . ,. .,; :..
~ . ' . . ~ ~ . . , . , . . . . .. ~ , " . ~ 1 ~ Ir - J'i~ , i ~1~'~, ~'tj.:Y;
.: .. _ . ... . . =
i
~ .~i
t ~ ~
~ r ~ ,,.• d ~."y
i
~~ Ix FUR7.'HT:'R .RESOI'~VEA thaL the Ant~heim City Planning Commiss:icn
doas hereby Fzn3 and determine that ~d~ptfon of this Resolution is expressl,y
~ ~redacaL•od upozi applican~'s complipnce wath ea.rh anc~ a1Z QE ~.he conditions
; heroinabove se~~ foxth. 5ho~xld anv such conditions, or an
declared iiiv~llid or unenfurceal.,ie b~~ tha final iud ment ofr arlth~~eO~~ bQ
campetent jurisdictian, then this R~solut:ion, and gar~ a y ~urt o~
; containad, sk~~t].1 be deemed null and voicl, y PProvals her.ein
TH~ FOR~GOZNG RESOLUTlON was ad~~ ed aL- thQ planning romcnission
meeting o.f Mar.ch 26, 1g9U, ~
:
i ~ ,r, ~.
~. . _~ " i
\~ ~~~ r
----~ =-~,-6-~' ~~ ~ . ~i.~, l, J,~
'.---CI•I;>ZRMAN. ANAHEU. CITY PLANNTNG C- g5I0N
ATTEST: ~
~~~~~ ~
_ -
-~ .~_ '~~
SECRRTAF'Y, p,Nl~HgIAq ~zTY ~'LANNTNG COMMISSION
STAT~ UF CALIFORNIA )
CQliNTX 0~ 012T~1~tGE ~ Sy.
C?1'Y OC ANAI3LIM )
I. Sdith I„ ?.iarris, Secretar
Commission, do hereb ~ Y ot the Anahei;n City Planning
y erkify tbat the for4going res~l,1tion w~s passed and
adopted at a meeting of t:.he Ar. tieim Cit~• Planning Commission held on March
26, 199p, by the following vote oE thQ members thereof:
AYr5; t".Ot~MISSIONERS: BOYDSTIJPt, BOUAS, H~RgST, MC gURN~Y, MESSE
NGES: COhIIrfTSSTCNERS: fTii;I.~LYCR
A~3~~Nr: COr4vfISSI0NE125; T~'FiLDHAUS
~ ZN ~VI:CNESS WHEREOF, 1' havo hereunt:o set my hanc~ this ,.~~k.
oC- . 1990.
-- ~ day
--____ ~~ __ ~~ '.~.~,~
SECRETARY, ANi1H~IM CITy pLA1~~ING CObiMISSION
-•5-
PC9~-78
~~