Resolution-PC 90-80;,,~,
~N1.4y
~~~4t.Umx9.N ~.4_~_.__~~2y~Q
A RESOLUTiON OI' THE ANAI~IE.TM CITY PLANt1INC G~MMTSSION
THI~T E'E'rITTON FOR RECt~ASSII'ICA~ION :ZO. 89-•9U-32 HE GRANTED, IN PART
WFIER~;AS, the Aut~tiaim City Plr~nn.inc7 Commicsion did recaive ~ vezified
potikion for 12oclassification of corrain real propo~rty si~uatod in ~he City nf
Anah~im, County oE Orange, Stuto of. California; describod au ~ollows:
Ar~~- 2
Approx9mutely Y3.5 acres ganerally bounded hy Water Street to ~ho
north, Anaheim I3oiilevard to thQ e~st, Valeiicia Avenue to Chs south
and [,amon Stzee~ to the, west; excluding the easterly 1G0 :E~et and tihe
sautherly ~8:i feot.
l~r~-~~
ApproximaCely 1.19 acros gei:erally bouz~dNd h}• Sar.ta Ana Street to ttte
north, Claudina Stx•eot to the east, Water Stroot ta the south and the
al.le~+ aast of Anat~eim Boulevard t.o thP w~st; ea~clud.ing ~he northerly
360 feaL•.
.'1: ~.d_.. ~!
Approaimatc~ly 16.4 acres g~nerally bounded by Water Street to th~
nort!i, Olive 5~reeL• t~.o the ei:;t, Soutb Street to tha south and th~
alley east of 1.naheiro Boulevard to t:he west; including the area
generally nouiided by Santa t.na Strc~er t~~ the north, Olive Streek to
L-ho Qast, Water SCL'P,Qt tn the s~ut•h and Claudin3 Stre~t to the west;
and exceptin.~ ttxr nortlicrly 360 feet and the oasterly 140 foet north
of 'r~ater Straet,.
Ar~~_~
A~proximately f3,g acres gene:a!ly bounded by South Streot tu ~t~e
norL-h, Olive St=eet t~ t:}ie e~st, Valoncia D,vei~ue to the south and the
allc~y ea~t Ar,aheim Eio~ilevard C~ t}-,e west.
WFi~REA5, the City ~lanninq Commission dicl holcl a puhlic hearinq at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaticir~ on March 26, 1~90 at 1:3U p.m., iiotice
of s..id public hear.in~3 having been d~~ly qlven ~:~ roquirod by l~w and in
acc~rc~ance ~,ith the provisions of the 1.naheim Municipal Coc1e, C2~aptQr 18.03,
to hoar and consider ovidence for and aqair.st safd pror,osed rErcla~~ification
and to investiqate an<1 make Eindings and recommen~9ations in connection
therowith; and
WNEk~AS, ~aid Commission, atr.ei due
,tudy made by it~elf anu .in it,; b~h~Z~, and
evidence and rsports offorecl at aaid hearing,
foll~w.Ing facts:
.inspertion, invest3.qation and
aFY~r due considar~tion of all
does find nnd determine the
1:3b5r _t_
PC90-80
p,~~+~R~, ~
'l. Tha~ tlia peC.itio:ier propose~s recla~si~ication uE
Ar.ea 2: fr~m tho RM-1200 (Itasiciential, Multiple-kamily) Zone kn the
RM-2400 (Resi.dontial, Multi~le-Camily) or a.lo3s intonse zong and
from t:he PD-C (Parkiiiy Aistric~-Conuncarcial) 'L~nc~ t~ tho Pp•.C/RM-24U0
(Parkitiq DisLr..ict-Comn~ercial/Residt~~itial, MultiplQ-Farnily) o: a 1~35
intence zone;
Area '3; £rom the PD_C (park.in~~ ll.istricr-C~~mrnercial) Zone to the
PD-CiRM-2400 (Parkitiy Distric'~.-Cc:nmercial/Rosidontial, Multiple-
Family) or a less inL•enae Zpj,a~
Area 4: frcm l•hQ RM-12.00 (Rosidentia.l, Multiple-Family) or RM-2400
(TZQSide:-tial, Multiple-~amily) to the RS-•720~ (Residential,
Single-Family) or r, less inter~~e zotie;
Ar~a 5: frorn the RM-12U0 (Reszdentia.l, Multiple-Family) to the
RM-2ACQ (Residential, Multipl~-•Family) or a less intense xone.
2. Thcih the Plannin~ Cortunission datermined at t}ie pub.lic hearing
that thos9 pz•operties in Sl-udy Area 4 should be exrluded ancl, should nok
rec]assit.ied at this r.ime.
3• T1-at L•he Anahe.im General Plan currently designa~e3 l~rea 4 for
MF:dium Qertsity Rr.sidentidl land uses and Study Areas ~, 3 and 5 for C,ow-Medium
Deiisity land uses. Fiowe~~er, ~erieral Plan lunondme;it t7o. 279-1, 2, 3 and 5
c:onsidered i.n conjunction wiCh subjeet i•eelassifieat3.on and recommendec; for
adnption by the Planning Cornmissian would re3nsignate tFose properties lacated
i.n St:udy Areas 2, 3 and 5 for Gow-Medium DensiCy Residerctial :l.and usc~s.
4. Th~tY. th~ proposed r.eclassification, as mitigated, pg subjact
propexty ig iio~ossary and/or desirablQ for tho orderly and proper deve7o~:,,ent
of t:i~c.~ c~rnmuni~.y.
S. That. t;t~e proposed raclassiEicaCir~n of. subjaat proper.ty c7oes
propEr~y rel~~~ to the zones and their Permitted u~e:; loca"!ly establx•shed in
r.lose prcximi`y to suk~ject nro~~er^,:y an~i to the zones and thoir permitted uses
genecally Qstablished thrauc~t~c.ut thr community.
b. Z'hat 15 inte:e::tc:c] per;,on;; zndicated their prNSencQ aC e~i~
~ublic hearing; and ttiat no corrESpondonco wa~ receiveci in oppos.{tlon to
subject petitio~i.
~I~LIPQ[7~IiA ENVI.R~Pt~S~NTAf____~)U;~J_ZrY_zYT__FINDIttG: That the Anahaim
C.•ity Planttinq Co~mnis:~ion tias roviev~d the pr~~~~3T1 to initiate the
re,:Iassificat.ion of tHos~~ st-,dy r~r.sas ~s descri*,ed in t~~ragraph No. 1 above;
and does hcrraby mpprqve the ttf!gative Decllration upon fi.nding that it has
co~s.idered thf, Negative DeclaraCion toaether wi;:h any commants recefvod
durin•.7 the public roview procesa arid fucther findi»g on tl~o basis of thg
init:a.l sL•u(iy ~na any comnn,~g ;eceiv~cl that khere is na substanti~l ~videncP
thal th,~ project aall !:~~~~; ~ significant. e[fect on tt~Q environr~i~nt.
~2.. PC9R-f30
. ~.f.`~
NOW, TIiEREFORE, HT: IT RES4l~VF.D that thg Anaheim ~lty I'lt~nnir,q
Commi~~aion does ti~roby qr~nt subj3ct k~titiun for Reclassification, in part,
and, by no doin~, ~liat Title :18-'L~niny af the Anahc~im Municipal Code bo
amended to exclude the abuve-cleseri.bod proporty ii, Ar~a 2 from tt~o RM-12Q0
(ResiddnL•izl, Multiple-Family) and PD-C (Parkir~g Di.Strict-Gommerci~l) Zon3s
and ~,~ incorporata said prapertiQe~ into ~ho RM-240A (IZesidoatial,
Multiple-fa.mily) ancl the E'D--C/RM-240Q (Parkinq Distri.ct•-Commercial
Rasidential, Muli.tip].c~--F'~uni.3y) 7.onos; and Ar~a 3 from the PD-C (F~arking
Dis~rict-Cocnmercial) ZAne and Lo incorporate said dc~scribed property iz~to the
PD-C/RM-2400 (I'arki.ng DistricY-Commercial Reaidential, Multiple-Fam=1y)
Zono; anci hrea 5 from the RM-17.00 (Rosid9:itial, bfultipla-Fami.ly) Zor.e and ta
incoi•porate said describec~ property into "he ~iM-•2400 (Residc~nLial~
Mult:ip:le-Family) z~riQ, uY~on th~ following condition which is herc~by foun~ to
ba a ner.e~sary prerequisi~g r,n the propocod ~~s~ of subjRCt gro~erty in nrc~er
to ~~reserve the safety ancl general we1Fa~~e nf th~ Citizens of the City of
AnaY-e i.m :
1. That .introduetion ~f an ordinance rc~LOning subjec:t properCy sh:.il bc~
r_ontingent upon CiCy Cauncil a}~prova]. ~f Genora't Plan r::nendmont No.
279-1, 2, 3 and ~.
BC IT FURTH[:R 12ESOLVL•'D that rhe l+naileim City Planninq Commission
dues hereby find ancl determine that a~o~cion of tkiis Rego].ution is AxpressJ.y
prodicatfld upan applican.t's ccm;, i~.a nce with oach arid all of the coniiitiona
inabove
t~sre set forth. °:~auld any s+xch conditions, or any pazt thereof, be
.
~3eclared invalid c: unenfareeable bx the final judgment o~E aziy court of
'
compe~snt ;urisdict:.on, ~heti this tserain
Ttesolution, and any approvals
con*_aSned, shall be de~~~~ed nul'L and void.
THG P~F?EGOZNG RESULUTION._was adovted aC 4~he P].anning Comm3.s5ipn
_ --.
m~etinq of March 26, ~.9~J0. ~ '~
~' , ,.
~ ----~.~4,c:~Ll. ~.G,~ ~ ~ ~-I~'---~ ------_.-_____
CHAIRhfAN, ANAfiEIM CI'TY PLAttNING COMMI~SION
ATTFST:
" / ~~~;h ~
..".__ ~~~~ ._tl~--. ~~r"- "_^_='`~--_~ __.__- _
SECREI'AR'l, ANAHEIM CITX F'C,ANNIi1G CON4fz5.~'.TOtt
-3- PC9U-80
.,-~,.,
;;,,~,,,
~
S'~ATL OB' CALIFORNTA
C~UNT.Y 0~' QRANGE ) ~s,
CI~Y OF' ANAHEIM )
I, ~dith I~. fiarris, Sacretary af Ghe Anah93.m City Planning
Commis5iun, do ~areby cortify that thR forego3n:3 resolur.ipn was p~ssed and
~~~P~~=:~ at a meering of the Anaheim City Planning Commission hold on r2arch
~G,. 195~0, by the follocving vote of tY~e member:; tllereof:
AYF;S: COtvII~(YS~~IONF.kS: flOYDSTUN, HOUAS, Fi~L~LYBR, FJERLiST, MC BCJkNE'1, MESSE
N~~I~S; COhII~fISSI0NER5: PIONE
A~~~~~Z': C~OMrlISSIONERS: k'ELl)HAUS
Ild WITNES5 WH@;REI F, T iiave linreunto s~t; my hard this ~~/~
of __.-~_~~.. ].990, aaY
1 ~
.__ ~.~.._~~~,ti.~ _
S~CRFTARY, ANAFiELM CITY PL.ANNING COMMI~SION
'°'~a",,g
, ~;~~
';,,,,
,~; I
1
'~,j _ PC90-80 ,