Loading...
Resolution-PC 90-99~~~ c,rt;, Aw;';i;~1 ~.ti;e:'F;;y~ ~ ~~. LU~'_Z~._N~..P~9~..,-~. A LiESOLUTTON ~F THE ANIIHEIM CITY PLANNING CON4YSI~SION THA:C P~TITION FOR VA~t2ANCE NU. 40~0 Dk; GI2ANTFD, IN PART WFi~REAS, ~he Anahoim Ci.ty Planni.ng Commisszon did receive a veriEi.ed Petita.ari fox' Variance for. c:ortain real proparty situatecl in tho City af Anaheim, Coun~x ot Orang~, Stata of Califor.nia clescribed as: L'JT 19 OF 'CRACT N0. 730, IN THF~ CIT~C QF r`.NAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE~ STATE QF CALIFORNTA, A,S P~R M1~E' T2ECORDED IN Ii00K '13, PAGE 25 OE MISC~LLANEOL'S MAPS, IPT TFiF bFFTCE OF TH~ COUNT~C RECURDEtt OF SAID COUNTY. WHEFtEAS, the City Plar~ning Co-mniss.ioii clid hold a public hearing ~r the Civic Centor in tha City af Anaheim on April 23, ].Q90, at 113Q p.m., iiotice c~ said public hearang having been duly qiven as requirc~cl by 1~w and in accurdance wzth the proviaions oF the Ar,aheim Muiiicipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and conwider evidence for and aqainst saicl proposed variance and to invesl•igat.e and make Eindings and rocommendations in cnnnection L•tierewith; and WHEKEAS, said Commis~ion, after due ins~ection, invesCa.gati.on and study mada by itseli and in its behal[, and ~fter due ccnsider.3ta.on of a11 evidence and reporhs of;ered ak said hoar.ing, does fznd and c?Qtermin~ the followin,q facts: 1.. That tha pel:itioner propases ~aaiver.s of the f~llowznq to ` construc:t two 2-bearoom apartment units in addition h.o an exi.sti.rig sinqle-far.ily dwelling: ~ A ) ~E~~.~4~1 ~f ~ ~.,_~~S? ~ - M i n iln~~.~i~_..SL~.e_S~ ~' ~ h r i ~..~C~~;r~~ • ~, ($_ f~gt required; 5 fe,~~ proposed} (Aj ,~GCTTON 10.32~f~1,Q1Q - Minim~m ~ il~ii~„~ite s3rea pe.r d.wel in~ uni4. (2.,. 4(ZO Sq, ftz,, roquirecl; 2a_~,89 sa. f~L proposed) (~) ~E~TI~.1~fL~~~~Lt~~9~z - ~i~_~4.~.~~ ?'~g.Rir~meri.~,• (B~cking oni:o a public stroet nQt nermittoQ; gr~~,~~cg proposed to back ,Q?t-,Q ClaudS.r~a Street) ;, (D) ~~~T ?t.~lEl~,O~Q~(~OlI - Minimum n,~mb~,r.yf _~ar inQ svaCes. ~ .~ $19~ Q`~Q ~ ~.1 z ; :~ ~ n~ ?,~~?~.4~.~_4~S? : f ! 2, That the above~menkio:ied waivers (A), (B) and (C) are ~'i~ hereby grauted on tht~ ba.5i: that there are speclal circumstanc~s applicable t~~ 4 t2iQ property such as size, shapo, topography, locatfon and surroundings which do rtot apply to other. iiientically loned praperty in tne same vi~iniCy; and that. sLr.ict application of the Zoni.ng Coda depri•:~s the propgrty of privf].eges enj~~yed by ot•hor properties in the idenL•ical zone and classiSication i» the vicini~y. ~~' 1399r -1 PC90-49 ;:, , ~_ ,. __._.,..~,~ , 3. Tbai~ the abova ;nenti:,nQd wai~!Qr (D} is Ya~ar.evy d~nied on L•h~ b~sis thar it was c~eletod s~ibsec~uent to ~uhli.c noh,ifir.atioxi. 4. T'~a1: thax'c~ are exceptional or axtr~iordir.ary circumst.~snc~:; ar c~~nclitior.s applicable ta tne properLy i:avolv~d or. to L},~~ intiended uso oF the property L•hat clo uot ~pp1y gsnera7.ly ro t.h~ prop~rty or class of. use 3.n thc~ same v.icinity and zone. 5. ThaL- tk:~ f equastad vara ~nce is iircassary far th3 pres~rvaL-a.on anci ~njoymont ef a substaritia'1 propArty right possFSSed by other praporty in tno same v.icinity and zone, and denied to th~ pz'oper~y in question, f~. That t•hs requestecl variance will not be mat,erially cietrimenral to the ~ublic welt-are or injur.ious t~ the property or. impr.ovements 3.n such viainity and zone in which i:ho property i, l ocat~d. 7, That tio ozie indiCatc~d their presonce at saicl public h~aring in opposition; and thal-. no corresg~nclence wa~ raceived in o~position to subject peti.tion. ~ALII'ORNI_~__ENVTR NMEt~TAL OUALI'rY _ A~T FINPtN~: The Plannang Director or his authorized repre:;ent;aCiva has u:terminecl that the proposed projQCL• L-~11s within the definition nf Ca~eqorical Exemptions, l:lass 3, as defined in the State F.IR Guic'ielines and is, t.heref~re, c~teg'orically exempt from tho requirement t4 r~repare nn Ei~i. 230W, THERFFORE, BG IT RESOLVED that the Anahaim City Planniny Commission ctoes hereby grant subjc~ct ~e~ition for l~ariance, in ~ar.t, upon tY,e tollowing conr3i~.ions which are hQreby founii to be a necQSSary prerequisite to the proposed use of. thQ subjecC property in order to preserve the safoty and ganeral welfare of: the Citizer~s ot the City of Ana}ieim: 1.* 7hat a fee ior street 1ic~hL•ing purposes shall be ~aid to the City of Ana~ieim based on the lengtY~ oL st~:e; i. frontngo along Claudina Stroet and in an amount as established by City Counci]. re~oluCion. 'l.* Thar a~ee for sLreeL• tr~o Qurposes shall be paid to thc~ City af Anahpim based on th~ 1@I1C~tIl of street LrAntage aiung Claudina Strcet and in an arr~ount ~s established by City Council xesolution. 3.* That subject property shall he served by underr,Y•ound util.ities. 9.* That Eixe sprinkiers shall be insta'lled as required by the City F3.r.o Department. 5.* ThaY, trash storag~ areas shall be providecl and maintained in a location acceptable to the Streot MainE:enance and Sanita~ion Division and in accordance with app•roved p}.ans on tilR wi.~h said Division. Such information shall be s.peci.fically shown on the plans submi~ted for buildinq permits. _~_ PC90-99 ~~* That prior to issuance of ~ ~ bu~.lding permi.t, the ~ppxopriate traffic ~ sigx~al assessm~rlt fee ~h~11 ba ~naid to the Cit~ of An~heim in an amount ~s estab].ished by City Council resolution. 7. * That prior ~c, is;,uance o~' a*~;ai7.ding pcrmiC, a z•c:creation in-lieu Fees sha11 be , PPrapr''``~g paxk dnd amourit as establist~ed b• ~~ia to tiie Ci t~, of An~he.Im xn a~ 1 City f:ounr.il zesolution, a•* That p].ans ;hall bs sui~mitted L•c> l:h~ review anc' approval showin • Cit•y `L'ra:Efic Engineer for his ~o. 6Q1 y cp~~formance with Engineering StLndaxd Plan perta:ining to p1rking standards. Subject property sh~ll thereupon be devel~~eci ~n~ maintai.Qd in conformance with said plans. ~• 2hzt th~ drivewa y cn C1au3~,n~ S~,eQr s~,~12 be cons~ructed with ~~n (,~p~ foot radius curb returns a~. required L~y the City Engirleer in conformance with Engineering Standard No, Z3;, 10.* That both spaces in oac?~ pair ot tandem parking spa;zs shall be assigizPd to i:he s~me dwelling unit. 11 • 1'hat guesr parkine~ shall be cl.eax•ly maxkP~t " ue:: t ,~ st,aJ.? be r~~,~i1y 1CCessible to motnrists from onL-igupuskstree Sl~ ~nd 1CCl35SW~~;~g , and/or lZ• That prior t•o issuar,;e ~f a builciing permit~ the legal owner(S) o~ ~ubject propei-t}• shall e:recu~e and rec~r•d an unsubordinated cuv~nant ia1 a form approved b,~ tho CiZy Artorne ~s agree no:, to c.orites-: the form~tioi: of an ~1~S~S~n e~lt a strict( ) nwhich may IiQreafter be i~rrnod, for tih~ un dergr.ounding of utilaLi~~s which disrrict(sj~could ~includea such logal property otvn~r'~ propgrty. ~3•'k Th~t all ~ir. conditioning faciliti.s and ath~r root and ground monntQd equipm~nt sha11 be properly ;,hieldec f.rom view and ttie sound buffered from adjac~nL- residential proper~ies. Such informution shall v6 sL~ECifscally .^,2io;~n on the plans submittecl fc;r b~iitding p~rmits. ' 14. That a11 plumbiny ur othor similar ~ipes and fix.tures located on the exter~,or ai tkie bui.ld.ing sha11 be fially screen~d by archiL•oc~;.ural dovicos a:,d/or appz•opriale buildi~:.,, matGrials; and, Eurt.her, such information sha7.1 be specifically yhown oTi t.h~ plans suF3mitted fcz ]~uzlding permit;.. ~5•* `~hat ~.he on~s.iFo landscaping 4nci ir.riq~~;ior. system sha1.~ be main~ained in compliance with Ci~y standards. 16. That prier to is,^,uanc~ of a huil3ing p~,,mi*, ~;he ~~gal prpparty owner shall prepaxe and r~cox•cl an ~.i~suborclinateci c:~venant limiting occunancy ~f each apartment uni~ tu no ~~o.re than ~wo (2) persons (other L-han c2iildren unaer the age of i`.wo (2) ~.•ears~ peL bed1oom. S«ici limitation -3 -- ~'C90-9g 1' i~~~ ~~ _, .;, . Ir~+l.r. ,. ~ . ~ ~ . . . ~., . .,r ~.. ,~ .. ~ ~ ~ . . ~. . ~ ~. . .. . ~ . - , . . ' . ~~~~~~;~~ ~~~'~1'?~ir~~SI41l~1~ I ~~ ~ m, . ~~ y ~A i~+~ Y~ ~i shZl~ bQ included izi ~ach lease,~rental agz•oernent. A copy of the covenant shall be submitted to and approv~ci by ~he City At~orney prior to recordation, A copy of the recurclQd cavenar~t shaI7 be .~urnishad to the Z~n.ing Division. ~.7. That an unsur,ordir.~ated covonant sha].'1 k~o recorded agreeing to provi.de the rentor ~~ each dwPlling unit with writ~en .iriformatiun obtained from '~~~ the School District(s) partainin to g possible ~vercrowdsd conditions and busi.ny ~tatus of L•he school(~? serving the dwel.ling unit. 18, That subject properCy shsll be developed substan~ialZ~, in accordance with plans and gpecificacians submitted to the City of. Ar,aheim by the petitioner and which pls,ns a:e qn file wiL-h ~he Planning DepartmQnt mar~lced Lxhibi~ Nos. 1 throu~h 4. ' 19. That prior t~o issuance af a buildzng permil: or within a periad of on~ (1) ye~~r fr~m the date of this reso.lu~~on, whichevex occurs £irst, Condition Nos. 1, 2~ 5, fi, 7, g, ~2, ~,3, 1~, 16 and 17, above-mentioned, shal.l be c:omplied wikh, ExtEnsions for further time to complet~ said c~nditions may be grant9d in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of thE Anaheim Munaeipal Code. Z~. Tllat prior to iirial building and zonina inspe~tians, Condi.tion Nus. 3, ~. ~. 11 arid 18, abovP-mentioned, sha11 be complied wi~h. 21.* Thai: approval of this applicatiun constitutes a,ppraval of the proposed request only L•o the oxtent tihat it complies ~~3.L•h the Anaheim hiunicipal Zonizig Cod6 and any other applicable City, Stste and Federal regulations. Approval does n~t include any action or finding~ as to compliar.cQ or approva]. o` the zeguest regardin~ any uther appl.icable orriinance, rQgulation or requirement.. Carid~.tions marked with an a:teris;c (*) aro requirod by establi::he3 laws, eod~s, reyulations ancl agreements aud ar~ not subjecC tu nc~gatiaticn. hE IT FURxFiER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City P].anning C~mmission does hero~y find ~nd dQtermine ~hat adoption ~f this Rcsolution .is ~xpressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with et~ch and all of the condition: heroina~b~ve sot forth. Shoald any such cor~diL•iuns, or any p~rh theraof, u~ declarod anvalid ~r unenf~.rceable uy the Einal j~idg~iRnt ~f any court of c~mpeCent jurisflir,tion, then this S~esoluL-ion, anci any approvals herein containQd, shall be doomed z~ull anci void. -4- nC90-99 ,;;; ^~~ `tj~ THE FOREGOING I?ESOL.U'rION w~s zdopLod r+t thc~ Planninc~ Commissio~n moRking oL• April 23, :1.990. ~~ , ,~~ l /~., / , ~ ~. L~ // ~S .. t k.. ~ / (, .~ j ~~ ~,-.-...' .~~..______ `.~_..__ _~ ~ ____ _~_ .~__ __ TEMPORARX CHATRMI~I ANAIiEIM CI'PY ~'LANNING COhib! ,'SION ATTGST: -~~~~ - - ~Y _ ~----_._--- SECI2ETARY, AlIAHEIM GITY E'LAtdNI:fG COMMISSION STA1'~ OF CALIFORNIA ) COU~:TY OF OR1~lJGE ) ss. CITY OF AN11H~ttd ) I, Edith L. EYaxris, St~cretary oE the Anaheim CiL-y ?lanning Corronissi.on, ~3.o hQrebx cerr_ify that Che toxegoing rosolution was passecl and adopted at a mooting of tY,e Aii~haim C.ity Planning Commis:~ion helct on April 23, 1990, by tihQ f~llowing vot•e ~f L•he mombers thereof: AYES: COt~lISSIONERS: SQUAS, CFLUEiAUS, MC DU.^.NEY, MESSF. NUES : I:OMMZ SS ION:.' RS : 230PIE A~3SENT: COMMISSIUNERS: IIOYDSI'U2t, :iELLYI".R, FtERBST IN WITNESS WFiGREOF, I have harc,ur.to sok my han~ Ll~is ~~ da~ of: _ ., 1990. i \ __-- ~ ' ~- vL~-s - SECRf.TARX, I~NAlIEIM CITY PLRNNI,NG C~t~tISSiON 0; -5- PC90-94 ___I