Resolution-PC 91-107i
,;,;
°~,-~„
~
RESO_ LpTZpN NO. PC9;1-1~7
~~
.'A RFSOLUTTON OL' TH~ AN~I,HEIM CTTY PLANNING COMMISSTON
THAT PETITION FQ12 CONDITIOt7A~ USE PEFtMIT NO. 3431 B~ GkANTED
WNEREAS~ the Anaheim City Planning Co;nmis3ion d.id xeceive a
, verified PE;tition for Condif.icnal UAe Perm.it for certrzin rea.i pr.a~ert;y
aitu~tcd in the City of Anatieim, Countx ~f Orange, Skate of California,
• described a~:
1~ARCGI~S 1 2'HHOU~H 5, INCLUSTVE, IN THk: CITy pF
At1AHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STf.TE OF c:AL' IFORNIA, AS PER
MAP FILED TN BOOIC 2p2, PAGES 24 AND ia, 7t1CLUST~/~ OF
PARCFL MAPS, TN THE OFFIC~ OE' THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the C.ity Planning Commissiori did hald a k~ublic hearing
ar rtie Civic Center in the City of Anatieim on July 15, 1991, at: 1:30 p.n~. ,
noticc of ~aid ~ublic heariny ;~aving been duly given as required by law ancl in
~zccordance with the prc~v.'t~ione of the Anal~eim Municipal Code, rhz~tez 18.03, to
hear ancl consider evidencs fo.r and again~t said proposed conditional use permit
anc•I to inveattgate und tfl:lltP. findinga and rec~mmendations in aonn~cti~n
therew~th; and
WEII;REAS, said Commiaaion, after due .'tnspectiar:, investigation and
'`~~aY ~t~~~~' ~y itself and in its behalf ,•snd after due consideration of <<].1
c~viclenc~ a;1d reporta offerec: at said hparir.g, does find and detercnine the
fol.lowi.ng factF:
1• T'`~lt ~'~e Piop~sed uoe is properly one fo~ which a condir'_oii,il
~t~~' ~ermit ie authcrized by hnaheim Municipal C~de S~cki~n 18.67,.0~0.~14 '.:~,
pe.rmit z church in an ~xisti.ri~ induetr.ially-Lelated office camplPx.
2• it~z~ the propo~~~ u~e will noL ac9ver.sely aifect the adjuining
l.~nd uses and the growth and developmerit cf the zrea in which it is proposed to
bc~ ].~cated.
3• That the ~ize and r~hZpt ~F the 31tP_ proposeG for the ue,e is
~?~=cl~i~.~~ to al.lok• thP ft~ll development ot the pr~po~ed u~e :~n ~:~ mannar not
clett.~.imentai to the l~articular area nor L•a i:he pcace, health, safety and general
ta~lLare of the Citizet~„ of the City o.f Ana}ieim.
4• ThaY. the granting uf the rond.iti.onal Use i~exmit under the
conciitiotl;~ impo~PC; ;.ill not bc detrimental to thc peace, hezltti, saiety and
~~en~ral welfare of the Citiz~nH of the City cf Anaheiin.
S' ThaL• t:he tz•aff.ic g~nerated by the pL'pp~~aeCi use w.ill nat:
iml~ove an undue burden uprn ttie atreeEs and t~ighways de~.igt~Pd and improv~d to
cai•,-y t;~e tra.fic i.n thn are~a,
~'?? 1:' 3 ~ F1 P
.1_
PC;~)1-i 07
, :.,,
4~''"~~~
G. Thzt no one indic:ated th~ir. preeenoe at ~aid pub.l.ic holring .in
oppoyition; and that no cor~:espondencp waa received in oppoeition to tI'1P
subject J;.~etiti~n,
CAI,IFORN7A FNVIRONDSFNTAL QUALITY ACT FTNDTNG: That the Anaheim
City Ylanning Commies~ion has reviQwed the propaHal ~o peLmit a r.hur:ch in ar~
exi~Ging indugtrially-related otfice coinplex o~n a reci:annularly-~hapcd parcel
of land consieting of approximai:~ly 9.93 acres located ai: Lhe northea~t corner
of La Palma Avenue ancl KeJ.lo~y Drive, haviny f..~nt~ges of appraximately 407
feet ~n thc noil-.h aide of La Palma Avenue arid 925 feet on the eas~ si.d~ of
ICc~ll~~gg prive, and fuz~ther described aa 5109 East La Palma Avenue; and does
liereby approve the Negati.ve Declaration upon finding that it has cons.iderec! ct:e
Negative Declaratioii together with any comments r~ceive~a, during the publ.ic
i°eview proc~s~ and further finding on the basi~ that the in~itial st~rdy a~ci any
comni~nts recE~ived that there ia na substantial evidence that the project: wil].
hlve a si.e~nif.icant eff~ct on the environment.
NUW, THLREFORE, II~ IT RESOI~VED that the Anaheim ~.tt:y Plar~ning
~omiTiission docs her~by grant aubjert Pet:ition for Condi~ional Use PermiL-, upon
L-he following conditions whir.li are hereby found to be a neces:ary prerecjuisike
t-.~~ t:tie ~roi7osed use of. th~ suhject. property iti order to L resei-ve i.};e s~:ety 1nd
c;eneral weliare of tlie Citizena of the City of Ana}ieim:
l. 7'hat a noli:~ wa~te manayement plan, incluaing recycl.ing c~pabilities~
st~r~ll bE approved by the Street tdaintenanc~ and Sanitatiori Division. UE~on
occupancy of tihe Froject, saicl plan shall commence and shall remain in
f.ull et'f~~ct as r.equired by eaid D.ivision.
~. * That p~-ior to i~sua~ce o~ a buildiny permit:, a tr;:f.L•ic si.gnal assessment
fe~ e:~uali.ng the difference b~t;~oeen the church and of.f:ice ~lasessir~ent fce3
shu11 bc ~Zid to the Ci.ty of Anaheim in an amou.nt as establish~d by Ci~y
Counci..l Resolution No. 89R-198.
3. '1'hat any proposed freestanding siqn on ~ubject Fr.o~~erty sha1L b~ a
n~~num~nt-t.ype not exceeding eight (8) feet in height and ~hall be su!~ject
to ttie review and approval of the City Traffic and Irattsp~~rtatio~i Manager
t.u deter,~ine ad~quate l~nea-ot-~ight.
~l. That ~ubject pro~erty Fshall be developed subetantially in accor.dance with
plans and ~peciYicati.ons suhmitt~:d t~ the City r,f Anah~im by the
petitioner and which plans are on fil.e with the Planriing Department marked
F;xhilait No:s. ?, 2 and 3.
5. 'I~I11L" I~rior to commPncement of thE activit~ authori~ed I~y t:1~iS 1'P.SOIlit1c7i1~
oi• pr.ior to issuance af n build.i.ng permit, or withi.n ~3 p~riod of one (1)
ye:ar from tha dahe of ttiis re~alution, whichever cccur.s fir~t, Condition
rlos. 2 and 3, above•-mentioned, ahal.l be compl:.cd wiY.h. Extensior~~ for
f.urt}ler ti:ce to comp:i,ete sai.d co:~ditionH may bc~ gz•anted in uccordance 4~ith
Secti~n 18.03.U9U of the i~naheim M~micipal Cacie.
6. 'Chat prior to conunencement o° the activity authoriz~~cl by thia recolution
or prior t~ tt~e final building and zoning inspec!:iona, wltichever occiirs
~ir:~t, C~IIr'I1.t10I1 No~. 1 and 4, above-menti.oned, shall be ~•omplied with.
-2- PC9i-1U'1
i-_ _
.o-
~~~:,,
,; ,'i
,„
~I'''^+~,
Y~
~~~~
7. *'I'hat approva~ of this application conr~titutea a~proval of the pr.~posPd
re~uesti on.ly to th~ Qx~ent that it com~lieo with th~ Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Codc~ and any other applic+able City, StatQ and F~deral Legular.i~r,~.
Approval doPS n~t include any ar.tion or findings ar~ to compli~nc~ or
approval of the r.~queai: regarding any other applicab].e ordinai;ce,
rc~gulation or requirQment. Conditi.on~ marked with an astRri3lt (+) ,sre
required by establiehed ?awg, codea, regulationa and ac~reements and aie,
therefore, not eubject to n~egotiation.
:•~ BL 'J:'T F'URT[iGR RESOLVEA that the Anaheim City Planning Commissian
r:. does herEby fincl ar~ci determine that adopt.i~n of ~t.hi.s Resolution is expr~ssl•r
predicated upon applicaut'e campliance with each and all of the condi~tions
herzinabove set forth. Sho~;ld ar.y auch condltion, or any part thereof, be
declared inval.id or unenforceable by thta final j~adgmeiit ot ariy court of
competF~nt jur.isdiction, then t.tiis Re~olution, ancl any approvals herein
contait~ecl, ~hall b~ deEmed nu~.l and void.
' THE P'OREGnIh~~3 12R~OLGTTON ~vae adopted ar the Ylanning Commissi.on
meetinc~ of .7uly 15, 19~31.
~~
' - - ~iLc iLi'-~' ~J ~~ ~ ' /' .t,.t~
C AIR~r70,~AN, ANAHEI.K CITY LA~JNING CUb1MISSIUN
A'I'7' T; S T : ~,
•~' _ ]
- --- ---f-V _~~..`_"'"IC- ~~ ~~ - G~/IiL~~_~ '-
SECRETARY, ANAEICTM CITY PLANNING CQMM7SSION
S'I'AT~ Or CALTFOi2NIA )
COUCI`PY O1~ ORAPJGE j nEi,
CITi.' OP' ANAFIETM )
~.
I, Janet L. Jeixs~en, Sacretar.y af the Anahei:n City P.la~~nir.g
Cammi.~sioci, do hereby ce:°ti.fy tha?: i~he foregoing re~olution was .~assed arid
ad;,Z~ted at a meeting oF ~he Anaheim City I~J.arin.ing Commiss.ion held on July 15,
1991, by t'tie fallowing vote of the memt~er~ tl~~reof:
11'tES: CODlMISSIONER~: F30UAS, AOYDSTUN, ~'ELU:IAiJS, HELLYER, HENiVINGCR,
PERA7.A
NOGS: COMMTSSIONERS: N~~P1E
AE3SL;N'i': CO:~SMISSIONERS: MESSE
.~
IP1 WIT;•~hSS WElEREO~, I have hereunto ~et m.y hz~n~.~ thi~, ~~ r~~ clay
~f ( , 1991.
_ r~~11~~% - ~ _ ~ .
_ ( L.1:i .L. _ ~ ~ . ~:I.n...~,1-¢.J
SECRETAF2Y, ANAFI~TM C~TY PL,ANNING C02•IMISSIODI
-~'~ PC91-107
• ~~;