Resolution-PC 91-152'~
;, ,
RES~LUTipN Nn• F~C91-152
' A RFSOLUTION OF T4iF ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIIG COMMISSION
' RECODitdFNDING THAT THG CI:Y CpUNCII~ ,
~ TO APPROVE DEVFLQPMENT AGREEN,. NT NOD gl O1 AN URDIPIANCE
~, (MUUNT.AIN PARK COMMUNITYI
,+'
~, WHEREA~, pur.suant to authcrity set fortli in Californi.a Goveznment Code
Sec~iUn 65864, et aeq., The Irv.ine Com an
' busineas as Foothill Coinmunity Bui.ldere (hereinafterMDeveloper),~hagtrequ~QtQ~
,~. the Ci.ty to enter ii:+:~ Development Agreement No. 91-01 t~ fu.rtY~er goverr. tY~e
i.r.~p1ementation of *he previously-appLOVed Muunta.Ln F~ark Specific Plan
`, encampassing epp~uximately 3,1~9 ar.res of unincorporated land located within
the Count}~ of Orang~ in ttie City of Anah~im's sph~re-of-influepce generally
~ bordered on the north hy
the Riverside Fx•eeway (SR-91) and the Gynaum Canyon
) Road int~rchange, on tha weat by The Sumrnit of Anaheim HilLa and Sycarr~ore
! Canyon development~ in the City uf AilaYiei
property wit}iir: n~~ an the eouth by unincorporated
the County of Ora:ige in the ~it og ,
~ sptlere-of-influence, arid on the east by unir,corporatiad property witllin ohPn~ets
of Anaheim'y s:phF~re-~f-influenc~ /L-he propo~~d C re~a Y
: developa~ent); ~~nd YP Canyon Spec.if.ic Plan
WEIEI2EAS, pur~uant to the CaJ.ifr~rnia Envir.•onmental Qual:,.ty A~~,
Environmental Tmpact Rep~~r.r No. 302 has be~~n pr~~•i,oiesl.y c;~iti `ied by the C.tty
Council on July 23, 1991 in canjuncti~n with G~ne•ral Pl~ln Amendr,ient No. 318 and
environmental impacts and mitigati.on meaE.;ir~; ~saociater.; with the M~untai.n park
Specific k.lain Praject wer~ addr•~soed through the c~rtification proceas, anC~ YlG
adr~itional i.mpacts would re9ult from tl:e approval ar executi~n ~~P this
DPVelopm~nt Acreement; and
WH~R~AS, purauant tv 5ections ~.1 and 2.2 of the Procedurc~~
Resol.ution, the Anaheim C.ity Planning Conuniasian c~id ho?.d a public t~earing at
the Anah~im C:i..vi~c CentE:r, Council Ch~.mber, 200 Soui:h Anaheim Boulevard, in the
Ciry of Ar~aheim, ~~n ~ctober 7, 19y7., at 1:30 r•m•, iiotice of aaid public
hearing ;~aving beFri duly given as r~quiced k,y 1aw arid in accordance ~oith thc
~r.ovision~ oF the Anaheim Mun;.cipal Code, Chaptex :i.8,p3, ~o }l@r3r and can~id~r
evidence far and againat aai.d development agrepm~nt and to investigate and make
find.inya and recnmine~datiuna in connection tharewith; and
WHEREAS, pure~uant to the F~rocP~ur.ea Rea~lution, ~he Dev~loper ha~
demonr~trated pligibility to ~r~ter i.nto thin ayrement by sh~w3.ny ttie following:
1• T1iat tt~e Project ahall occupy at leaar 50 acres (site encamnaases
3,179 ~sciea) upan completion; and
2• That the Proj~ct wi.l.l r~sult in the construction of at leaet 250
c:wellictg unite (7,966 uni~s approved); and,
3. Tha~ the Project will b~ cnn~tiuct~d xn phae~a over an
anticioatad perio9 of not 'le~o th~n 5 y~~ry (15 year~ propoaed).
CR1303EH
-1•-
YC91-152
WH~REAS, said Commiasion, after due cona~deration, j.nspoctio~,
investigation and stud~ made tiy iL-self, and Hft~r due consid~ration vf all
eviclence and reports offered at said hearing, DO~S 1HERBBY FIND:
(1) That the proj~ct ia coneistent with the Gar,era.l Plan of th~ ~ity
of Anaheim;
(2) That the pr~oject is r,ompatible with th~ uses authorized in and
tt~e regulatiox~3 preocribed f.or in the applicable zaning diatrict;
(3) Tha~ the project i~ compatible with the or~derly devel~pment of
property in the aur ounding area; a~lc~,
(4) That ~he projec+: is not otherwise detrimental tc, the hQaltYi,
eafaty and general welPare of L-ha citizPns of Anaheim.
iV~w Tri~AErURE BE I7' RESOLVED, that the Ana.heim City Planning
Commi.soiun does herF~y find tt~at Fnviror.mentai Impact Report No. 302 hac~ been
provio~~sly certified by t}ie 'City Counci.l on July 23, '1991, i.n conjunct~.on wi.th
Gpn~ral Plan Air,Pridment No.. 318; and that eiivironmer.tdl impacts and mitigati.or~
measures asr~or~iated with the~ Mountain Park Spr?cifir Fl~.tl Prcject •~uere addresaed
through the certification process and th~t no ~dditional..tmpar.ks would result
from the approval or execution of thia Devslopm~nt Agreement and ia, th~refnrQ,
adequate to ser:ve ~s the reguir.ed environmer~tal dor.umentation.
BE IT FURTHER RFSOLVc^,D, that puryuant to tt~e above fin~linga, th~
Anaheim City Planni.ng Commissian daes hereby determinF tt~at the developer haa
demonstratad eligibility to enter into Development AgreErrient No. 91-01, and
does hereby recommend that ct~E City Cour.cil approve and enter into Develo~ment
Agreement No. 9C-O1, subject ta L-b~ followir-y t~uo ~orroctians:
~1. Secti~n 8.1.1 - Changing r.equirement th~t the f.ee payment ~ccur
upori recordation of ~:Yie final map, rathtr than atter recordetion
ot the final map.
9. Sectian 4.1 - Char.g.ing date fror~i "on or b~t~r.~ January 1,
2002~~, Lo '~on or before January 1, 1995, or as may b~~ extended
due to th~ l~ngi:h of time tha* the ar.nexatiun may bs dc-layed duc
t~~ litigation. ~~ ,...
r" i'"~ ~ v
~ `!~ f~~-,~'C C ~ ~ / ~ /~ ,C' -~ ~G, n ~
-{-~ /y~r r
~FTAIRMAN, ANAHETM C:[TY,PLANiYI CO~'ION
ATT.F. ST :
Y~~~
:f ~~ -•
~ ~
~ ' .'~.~% ~
SECRETARY ANAHE IM CITY PI~ANNIIVG COMMISSION
-2-
PC91-152
:~,~'•. .,; ~, ... .
sl~ii~
~~~
~„` STATE OF CALTFORNIA )
s~.<'. COUNTY OI' ORANGE ) so.
4?
~Y;. CTTY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Ha.rri~, Secz-etary af the Anaheim City Plann.inq Conunission,
do hereby c~rtify that the .'oregoing reaolution was passed and adapted at a
meeting of the Anaheim Citx P~anni.nr Commiaa.ion held cn October 7, 1991, by tl:e
iollowing •vote of th~ ttiembers tt:ereof:
~Y~~~ COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BRISTOL, H~LLYER. HF;NNINGER, b1ESSF;, ~ERAZA
NU~S: COMMISSIONERS: NONE;
ABSENT: COMN,ISSZONERS: 'LEMEL
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have her.euntn set my hand thi.~ ~~~day
of ,1991. `
~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ -~
SECRET7IRY, ANAHEIM CITY. PLANNiNG COMMI£STON
-3" PC91-152