Resolution-PC 91-156~
F2ESOLUTTOY NO. PC91-156
A RE50LUTIUN OF THE ANAFIFIM CITY PI~ANNING COb1MIS5I0\'
THAT PETITION FOR CONDTTIONAL USE YF~:RMI': NO. 3458 R~; DFNIED
WH1:R~A5, tl~e Anaheim Ci.ty Planning Commiasi.on did rec~i:~e a
verified Patition tor Conditiof~al U3~ Permit for c2rtain real nroperty situaL-ed
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of. Ca].ifer.~;ia, cle~czibed as:
LOT 1, 2, 3 ?iND ~1 OF TRACT NO. 27U1, IN THE CT'iY OF
ANAI-IEIM, COUNTY OF URANGE, STt1TE OF CAL'1PORNIA, AS PER
MAP RECURD~D IN BpOK 1].5, PAGE(S) 5 ANU 6 Or
MISCELLANEOUS MAI'S, II3 THE OFFICF OF THI' COUNTY
RECORL~~I2 OF SAlU CCUNTY.
WHEREAS, thp Ci.ty Planning Commissi.c~r: did hold a publi.c tiearing
at th~ Civic Cente: iii the City of Anaheim on Octob~r 7, 1991 at 1:3q p.m.,
noti.--e af said public tiearing having been duly giver~ ~s required L•~y law and in
accor.clance with the provisi.on~ of the Anaheim Muni.cipal C:ode, Chapter 18.03, to
hear and consider ~vidence for and againsr_ said ~ropos~d conditional ~,~se permit
and to investigat~ and make findingc; and rec.ommendations in ~~onnec.tion
therF~with; anci
WHEI2EAS, said C~mmis~sion, after due inspecti.on, i.cive~tic~~tion and
stucly ma~9e by iteelf ~nd in its behalf, ar:d a£~er due ~~n~i.deratiori of. all
evi.dence and r.np~r~tQ offerecl at aaicl hearing, doea iine~ and determinc the
foll.otioing f.act.a:
1. That t:t~~ propoged us~ i~ properly one for ah.Lch a conditionaJ.
u~e E~t~rmit is auttiorized by A~iahei~n Muriicipal Cocie Section 18.44.050.010 to
permit the r~tention ar,d expa.n3ion of a cabaret witl~ on-premise aale and
cc~nsumptiori of al.cohol, and wi.th waiver of ttie follc~winrJ under aut:nority af.
Sect.ion 18.06.U80:
S~C'CION5 1£i.OG.,Q50.U211 - t4inimtxm numb~r of ~~ar)cing apaces.
18.06.050.U22 (95 r~quired; EQ exi.ating)
18.OG.050.0235
and 18.44.OE6.050
2. 'Phat the proposed use i~ hereby denied.
3. Tt.at th,e pr.•oposed waiver i~ hereby denied on the basis ttiat
subject use permit wa~ cleni.Ed.
Q. Thai: the proposed ua~ will adveraely affect the adjoir~ing
l~~nd uses and the growth .~nd clpvolopment of the aLea in which it is pr~posed to
be located.
5. That the aize anci shape of L•he site propcsed for the use is
not adc:quate te allow L•he full cle~~elopment of the proposed u~e !.n ~ manner rio~
dpf.rimental ;.o the particular are~ nor L-o th~ peace, health, ~afety and general
wel£ar.~ of tli~ r_itizen~ oF the City af Anaheim.
CR13U7MS -1- PC91-:.56
6. That the granting of the Condi.tionzl Use Pe~niit will be
aetrim~ntal tn th~ pEace, health, eafety ~nd gerieral. welfare of the Citi.zen~s of
the City cf Anaheim.
7. That ~he traffic genez~~ten by t17e proposed u~te will impoae an
uriclue Uurden upon the streets and highways desigr~ed and i:npraved Lo carr.y the
tr~ffic in the area.
8. That ten (10) ~~eople indicated ~heir. presence at- said public
heaiing in oppo~i:ion; and that no corr.espondence was received in opposition to
the ~ubjec:t petition.
CAL'lFORNIA F.NVIRONMENTAL QliAI.ITY ~1CT FINUING: That tl ~ Anaheim
City Pla~;ning Conunission has revic~wed the proposal L-o permit the L. tion and
expan~iun o~ a c:abaret with ~n-premise sale anc~ consumpti~n ot a~ ~hol., and
wit.h wai;er of: mir.~i.mum numb~r ef par}:ing spaces on an irregularly-shaped parc~l
of lrnd consisting of approximatel.y O.t35 acre loczted at the southeast corner
of Colch~tster llrive and Colony SL-ree~t, havirig approximate fronlageA oi 119 feet
on th~e ,:,outh side of rolchester D_~ive and 312 feet on the east side of Colony
StrE~et ar~r] furrher described as 223•G Wes~ Colchester llrive (Suites 10-1?.); and
doeta her~:~by deny i:he t7egative llecl~ration ~~pon f.inding that it has consi~iered
the P?~eqai;iv~ Der,:laration tagether wi `h rany comment~ rECeived during the public
revieo: p~:~ocess and furL-her finding c~~~ the ba~i~ that the initial study and any
comme~!tr; received that r_hare is sub~•tantial evidecice that the project will tiave
a ~igrii:i.<:~ant effect on tl~e environme~nt,
iVOW, THEttGFOftE, 3E IT R~:SOLV~D that t; Anaheim Ciry Planr~irig
Commie3ion does hereby cleny suuject Pet~.tion L•ar Coiid.i.t.ional U~e Permit, ~n the
basi~ of th~ aforementioned finclings.
THE FOREGOTNC ~tA:SOLUTiON was adopted at i:he Planninc~ Conunis~ion
me~ring of Octaber 7, 1991. „_ ~J
/~ J ~•' ~ '~'4.-
/ ~ ~} , .,'I ~` ~ /~f '._'.,,~ ~ .r~ .~•l.~l.-
~ ,_ ~_ : .
CHA RtdAN, ANAHEIFI C.ITf PLHDININv CODIhIT ION
ATTE"T: ,
-~!`-~=-'_-__ / 'h ~__
SECRE'~ARY, ANAHEIM CITX PI_~AIVNING COMPSISSION
-2-
PC91~^150
: '~f
, -,~,,
, ` ''.~~':
STATN' pr^ CALIFORNIA )
COUN'!'Y OF ORANGE ~ $s .
CITY OI' ,ANAHEIM ~
I, Edith L, f~arria
Camm,ission, do hereb ~ Secretary of th~ Anaheim City Pl~nning
ado tPC~ g Y ~er.tify that th~ fcregc,i~~g r~solution w~3s p~~sPd and
p at a meet.in of the Anaheim Ci.ty planning commisaion held on octoher 7,
19`~1~ ~Y the following vote of the :~embe.rs thereof:
AY~S: COMMISSIONERS:
BOUAS, ARISTpL, HEI,LYER, I3ENNTNGER, MESSE
NOES ~ ~'E~2A
COMM~'S5ION~R5: NONE
ABSEfJT; COASDSTSSIONERS: 2EMEL
--~~~ L.~~"'=TN WTTNESS F7H~REOF, T have heraunto set m
of. 1991. Y harzd ~:his ~
' day
_____._. ~ ~.~" '~ ~ , ~
_ ~~ ~
SF.CR~:TARY, nNAHEIM CIPY PLANNI~G r ~
OMMIS,, IQN
_.~-
P~91-156
`'`"~~~u,5rl+;~ liic~ ~