Resolution-PC 91-2~
RFSOLUTI,QN NO. PCy1~U~
A RE;S01:li'CI()N Of~ 'I'I-I@: ANAFIESM CTTY PLANNTNG COAIMIS5ION
2'HA1' PE'i'J'TION FOR CCND7Tl:ONF. USE PEF2MI1' NO. 3368 $E CGR~IPITP:D
WHEft~A;,, the Anaheim Ciry Plannicig Cn:nmiasion dic.9 r~ceive a
veri=iad Petition for_ condti~:i.onal. Uee Permit foz ccarta.in real properky
situated in tl~e City ot Ariaheim, County of Qrango, Stato of Ca;ifoxnia,
deaciibed aa:
E~ARCFL 3 OI' PARCEI~ MAP F~7-446, IN TFIE CIPY OF ANAHEIDi,
(:OUIQTY OF~ URANGE, STATE Gk' CALIFORNII~, AS PER MAP
FIL~k:q IN BObK 253, YAGES 41, 42 ANll 43 OP' PARC~L MAPS,
7N THG OFFICE UF TEik: COUNTY REI:ORDFR QF SAiD COUNTY.
Lr'HEREA~, the City Plannzng Commiesion did hold a oublic hearing
at tt:e ~ivic Centei~ i.n the City of Anahoim on January 14, ].9J1, at 7.:30 p.m. ,
nutice of aaid public t~earing having bee~ duly given ar~ required by 1aw and ir.
ar.cordance w1.rh ttie prov~isions of L•ho Anaheim hIunir,ipal ~^.ode, Chapter 18.03,
tc~ hear and connider evidence for• and againot sai.d proposed conditionaJ. u~se
permit and to inveotigate and ma}ce findinys and r.f:commendations in coi~:~ection
therewith; and
WfiER~AS, said Ccmmiasion, after. due i.nepectioii, investigation
and Fztudy made by it~elf and in it~ b~half, and after due consicieration of ail
evidEsnce and repor.tr~ offered at 331C~ hr~aring, doce~ fi.nci and determine thp
ial]owing facts:
1. That the pr~pos~d ~zae ia pr.operly one for whir,h a
condit.ional u,~e permit is authorized by 7~na3~eim Muzicipa7. Code Secrion
18.73s050 and Section VI F.l.d.l vf Specific Plan F38--3 (5P r~8-03) to p~rmit a
1,G0~7 sq.f~. douc7hnut ~hop in Devclopment Area 2.
2. That th~ pr~~posed use wi.ll. not adversely ;:ffect the
adjcining land useei and the growth and ;ievel~pme~~t of the area in which it ~s
propcr~ed Co b~ lc~cated.
3. That the size and ~hapE~ of the ~ite propoaed for the use is
ac9equate Yo alJ.uw the iull developn;c-iit af. the propoaed uae in a n,anner riot
dpr.r.imental. t~ the ~articular a.:ga nor to tt~e poace, healt-~i, safety and
yenera?. welfarc~ of L•:le Citi;.ene of the ~ity of Anah~?m.
4. That the grar~ting of thE C:onditional Uae Permit under the
conditions fmpoaed, ii any, o-~ill not be detr.i.nental to the pea~e, health,
s~fety and general welfar.e of the Cit-i.zene+ of the City of Anaheim.
`i. Thst the L•rr.ffic generate:d by ~hc~ proposed use will not
impoae an undue. burdFn upon th~~ atreek~ and hiyh~~rays designed and imp.roved to
c:ax'ry the traffir, in the area.
CR1088MP -1- PC91-02
~.~; :,r~
f~• Thac. no one indicated their presencF at said ~ublic hearing
in opPosition; and that no cor.reapondence was r~~ceiv~d .in npposition to the
ei.~bject: pt,tj.~ion.
CAI,IrORNIA EP7VIR~ ONrfFNTAL OUAI,I'LY ACT t'~~TNDIt1G: That t;he Hnahe3.m
City Qlanning Cor~un3aeion hae reviQ:vPd th~ pz~po8al to permii: a 1, 008 sc~, gt,
doughnut eho~ on a;i irregulary-u:~Aped parcel o f land conaiating ot
approximately 2i~ acr~e~ l~cated at the a~uthwQC~t corner ag L$ Pa.lma Avenua ~tnd
Tuet±r, ;,~~;~,~~ having ap~raximate frontayen of 659 feQt on the south aidQ of
L~ p~:~m3 AvNnuE and 1,2J4 feoi: an the weot aide of Tuetin Avenue and 2'urther
:+aocribed aF.~ Santa F'e Paciflc Centor; And doeg hereb;y appr.ovo the NEgative
Declaratiori upcn finding that it has coneidered tlae Ne~ative Declarati~~n
t~gether with any commen~e received during the publi.c review procees ar~d
further. finding oil the baaia tiiat the initial etucly and ~ny commentA rer_~ived
that there is no ~~abetantial evidence khat the project will tiav~ a significant
effect on the env.ir.anment,
NOW, THERFFORE, BE iT RL'SOLVED that the Anaheim City l~lanning
Commi~sion doey her.eb,y grant ~ubj~~ct Peti.ti~n fc~r Conditional Une Permit, upon
the fc,.llowin~ cond.itians whir.h ar.e h~reby founcl to be a nQCeQeary prer.equisite
to the prupor~~d u~f~ oi the subject property i.n order L-o pr.eserve the safsty
and qe~n~ral we;fare of the Citi.r.ene of the Ci.t,y of A-iaheim:
1• * That the proposal sh~11. comply wiL•h al.l oigniny requi.rements of SP 98-03,
unle~s a variance al.lowing ~ign waivero is approved ~ay the City Councii,
Planning Commi~nion or Zaning Admini.otra~or.
2• That an
A+~}^~l~ey ur.~ubordlnated covenant i:~ a form satiafactory tu thQ City
and Zo~in
pi
i
County of g
v
eian ahall be recorded with th~ Office of the
Orange Recorder to
epecific g~iarantee t}~at the entire complPx within the
plan area ~f SP 88-03 ~hal
l
integral .
bP man~zged and maintained ae one (1~
parcel foi~ the
ej.gnage, purposeA cf parking, vehicu].sr. circulaL-ion,
larid uc~agc and azchirnctia~:al
shall bE control, and L-hat Raid r,ouenant
refe~°enced in all deeds transferrin
l'1
property. g a
or any part of the
3• Th~.t s~xbjAC~ pr~j~pLty eh::~ll be deve].opHd ~ube~~ntially in accordai~ce witti
plane and epeeii`icat
i
petitioner .
oiia ~ubrr,itted k~~ tlie City ~f Anaheim by the~
and which
i
p
an$ ar~ on filz with ttie Planning De~art~ne~nt marked
Exhi.bi.t No~, 1, 2 :~nd '?.
4. That prior to comm~ncement of thc activity authorizect by th~.s rr.so.Iution,
or prior to ienuance of a building permit, or within a period c~f one (1)
year from ih~ clate of L-hi~ resolution, whichEVer occurs first, Conditio:n
No. 2, above-ment•.ion~d, shall be compl.ted ~oith. ~xtensione f~r furthc~r
time ko camplote e:~id conditioii~ may be gr.2nted in accorda~nce wi:h Secti~n
28.U3.090 of the Anaheim N,unicipal (;oda.
5• xhat prior ta commenceroent af the aativity au*_harizFd by this i:ec;olution
or prior co final building and zonin9 inspectione, whicliever occ~,ir6 firet,
Condition No. 3, above-mentionecl~ ~ha1.1 be comgli.ed witi~.
°2-
F'C91-02
~`',~,;.
LfJ:~ ~.i r:
;~•',~~ ~
:.~.1
~~
6. * Th~t approval of th.ie appl.icaLfon canstitu~es approval of the p~-opnsed
roqu~st only to the extant that it compl.i~d with the Anahein Munici.pal
Zoning Code and any ott~er a~ipl.i.cable City, Si:ate and Fed~ral r.egulations.
APproval d~ea not includn any ~~cti~n or tindings aq to complianae or
appr.~val of the r.eques*.. regar.ding ~ny other applicalale ordinauca,
regi.i7.ation or requireme»t. Co~nditiono marked with an asterisk (*) are
r.equired by er~tabl~shed latiz, codE+.e, reyulationa and aS~rFementa and rir.a,
ther~f~r.e, not aubject to negatial:i.o~i.
B~ IT FURTHER I2GSOLVrD that th.e Anahpim City Planr,~ing Cocnmisaio:t
doee hereby find a,nd determinr, that adapkion of thia Resu.luti.on is exp•resaly
~~r~di.cated up.~n applicant'e comi,lit~nc~ wi•th P.i.CYI and all of the conditi.ons
her.ainabov~ s~t for.tt~. Stiauld any such conditian, or any part: ther.~3~f, be
de~lzred invali.d or uiienforceable by the fina'1 judgmont of any court o£
compet:Qnt j~trisdi.ctian, t.heti thie Res~~lut:..ion, and 7i1Y ii~.p~YOVc'~1f3 herein
cantained, shall h~.3 deem•=d c~uil and void.
4'HE FOREGOI:NG RESOL'U'.PIUN ;aae aci~i~ted ~t the Planninq Cornmi~r~ion
meetinc~ of 3anuary I4, 1931. ,, ~~ ,
~•, ,y, ~ ,~
,~' t~~ '• ~
'i' ~. _~ ,f ,~; 7..__.__.
/' ,~c'.~ t' .` '~ i''~,~ , -, ~_..:.~~ ,, .C.i.+t,~_..;
!:HAIRWOMAN, ANAEIEIM` CI'TY~PT,ANNIP~G COM'MTSSIOM
AT': E.°,7.' : //
r_....~ / r , . -- --- --•--- ._
SECRETARY, ANAHFIM CI7'Y PLANNIIdG COMMISSlON
STATE OF CALIFORNIR
COUN'PY OC ARANGE ) ea,
CITY OF ANAHE3M )
T., Edi.th L. Harrio, Secr~L•ary of the AnahE:im Cit:y Planniny
Commieaiun, do herek~y cer.tify that the foreyoir.g re~olukic+n waa passecf and
adapted at a meeting oF tl:Q Ansheim City Plannin~ r~~~nisai.on held on Jar.uary
14, 1991, by the fol~owing vate of the rneml~el-s t'siereoi:
AXES: COMMI..~'iS70A'ERS: 90URa^, BOYUSTON, FELUHAUS, HFiLI.YEF:, HENNINGER,
MF.SSE, P~RR?,P.
NOES: COMMISSIUNERS: t70NE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
~
IN WITNESS WHFREOI', I hav~ hereunta set: my h~~nd thi.~ --G.J ir~ d~
o f , -N~. ' , 19 91 . ~ Y
/ ~ ~y
/, ~~ ,~~~" ~ ~.,j~ ~.~/~
-y-~.'~~~:L-=-- '--~--~-~LZ•`~__
Si. s~1?T RY, ANAHEIM f;ITY PLAfININC COM.'3ISS7UN
-3-
PC91-02