Resolution-PC 91-27~~;. ~«j
~;~.;?:~,
RES~LUTI~ON NO. PC9. 1-27
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM C'.ITY F~LANNING CUMMISgYON
'rHAZ' PE'1'TTION T'OR COIVDTTt7NAL USE P~RMIT NU. 33f3h gE GRAN~ED
WHERF.AS, the Ai:aheim Gity planning Commiasion did receive ~
verified Petit9.on f~r Conditional U~e Permit fnr certair~ re~l prpF~r~y
situated in the Ci~y of Ax~aheiin, County of Orange, State of CaliLarnia,
described as;
LOTS 54, ,5, 56, 6?., 63, 6q tiND '!'HE EASTE!tLY.
RH CTANGULAR 2 TNCHES OF TFI~: NORTH~RLY' ftEC~'ANGULAR 2p
r~E'i OF LOT 57 .iN BLUCK "E" Or "HEIMAPTN ~Nb GEORGE'S
MAP OF ADDITIAN BUI'LUIN~ T,pTg", AS SHOFIN ON A MAP
RECORDED TN BOOK 2, PAGE 2qg dF MISCELLANLOUS RGCORDS
nF LOS ANGELES COUNI'Y, C1ILIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the CxtY planning Commiss.ton did h~ld a public hea.r.inc~
at th~ Ci~ic Center in the City of Anaheim on I'ebruary 25, 1991
notice o£ said public hearing haviny been dul ~ a~ 1:30 p,m,,
~ccordance witl~ the provision~ of, the ,qriaheim MunicipalgCode,~iChapter118.03a ta
hear and consider evidc~nce fnr ~nd againat said prapoaed conditional u~e permit
ancl to investiq3Le and make findir2ga and recommendations in connection
therewi•th; a:~d
WEIGREAS, ~ai.d Commie;3ion, after due inspecti~r., investigation and
study made b}~ itself and in its behalf, and ~fL•er due conaideration of all
ev.idence arzd reports offered at ~aid hear.ir~~g, c~Qe~ g~~~ and determine the
f~llowir~g fac~s:
~. Ttiat hhe propo:3ed use is properZy one for which 3 conditional
~.13~ pet•rni~t is authoriz~d b}~ Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.45.050.130 ta
r~tain an exist.ing r.hurcfi with wa.iver. of th~ following urider authority of Code
Sectir„~ 1f3.06.Of30:
SECTIflNS 16.06.050.U2f6 - Minimum number of arkinc~ spaces,
~n_ d lg, 45. 066. U50 -'~--.. _ -
(2UI required; npne e•~cisting}
2. That tl~e r.equeatec~ waiver i.e her.eby granted on the bas.is tliat
rhe parkiny waiver wi11 not cause an incre3e~ in traffic con~estio:i in the
immediate vicinity nor aciver.sely aff.ect any ad.joining lanci usee~ and granting of
the parking waivex under the conditinns imposed, if an
detrim~nta?, to ~Ita peac;e, h~alth, safe~ Y~ will not ~,e
the Giry of Anaheim. Y and yeneral wel~`ar.e of the citi.z~nes op
3• That the proposed use is hereby qranL•~~ for a period of two
(2) yearc~ unt~.1 F~Pbzu~ry 25, 1993; and that extennians of time may be r~quested
and may be granted for additional two (2y yeai periodo.
~3. That tt~e propoaed uae wi.i.i n~t adveraely affect the adaoining
land ~ises ar~d the growth and development of the area in which .i.t is p•ro~oseci to
he loeated.
CR1121MY
-1-
PC91-27
F.;"f ic;~
~ ,, : ~~;~,
5. That the aize and ahapc of th~ aita propnsed foz the use is
adequate to allow the £ull developmeTit c,f th~ proposAd use :in a mann~r not
detrim~ntal to the pa.ri:icular area nor to the poace, health, 3afety and g~neral
welfare of the Citizeno o£ the City of Anaheini.
6. That the granting of the Co,~ditionz) Usp Permtt under the
conditione impos~d, if any, wi11 not bE de*_rimental to tile peacP, health,
eafety and general we lfare ~af the Citizens of the CitX of Anah~im.
7. That ~he traffic generated by ih~ pru~oaed use will not
impo~e an undue burden upon tt~P BtrEet~ ~nd highways de~igned and .i.mproved tp
earry the tlaffic in the area.
8. That no one indicated their presence at sai~ public heariny
in oppos;_~zOn~ aRd tn~t rio carrespondence wae received in oppo8ition to tho
subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVTRO~,_ NMEN'l~pii, pUALITX ACT FINDTNG:
City Ularining Commis s i~n has reviewed th p oe r poeal to retain an~existingAchurch
with waiver of minimum number of parking epace~ on an irregL:iarly-shapzd parcel
af land cunsiating of approximaL-ely 0.8 acre lorat~d at ~he ~~„thpae~ ~Urner of
Anaheim B~~ulevard an~ Adele Street, having approximate .frontage~ af 132 feet on
the eaJt sidc~ of Anaheim Boul~vard and 232 feet nn the t~ou•th ~ide o£ Ade1e
Street, and furr,};er ~Q~cribe@ as 32U Nori:h Anaheim Boulevard; and cioea hereby
a~~~rove :he Negative Declaration upon f.inding that it has consiciered the
Negat.ive Declaratiori togAther wi~h any commente received durinc~ ~;~E public
review ~rocesn and f u rther findiny on the baais that the initia.l atudy and any
comm~nts received th at there ia na r~ubatantial evidence that the proj~ct will
have a signi.ficanL effect on the e-ivironment.
NOW, TT-IEZ~FORE, BE IT RE~OLVEb that the Anaheim r{ty Planning
Cprrmissipri doed her~ by y~•~1nt ,ttbject Fetitic~n for Conditi~naJ. Uee ~ermit, upon
the following conc?ition~ whi_ch are hereby found to }-.,e a n~cessary prezequisite
to the propoaed u~p n£ tl~c ~ubject property in arder to preser•re the ~a~ety and
general welfare c~f the Citlzens of the City of. 1lnaheim:
1~ * Th~t trash starage areas shall bP ~zovided and maint~ined in a location
acc~ptatlF ~o the Street Maintenance and t;ani~.at_ion Di~~ision and i,i
accordance with ~ppr~~v~d plans on ±`il~ w.ith s43_d divit~.ion.
?• That a s~J.id wastP management plan i.nc.Ludiny recycling capabilitiea ohall
b-a submitted to th~ Street Ma.i.ntenance and Sanitation nivision for review
and appr.aval. Said plat~ shall commence anr~ ahal]. remain in full affect
as required by oaid Di~~i.sion.
3. * That ~rior to S eptember. 13, 1991 (~.n accor.dance with a letter of
extension granted to Pa~tor. Phi1 Aguil.ar. un Septembez 13, 1990), fire
sprinklere shall be installed as required by the Fire Dep~,Ltment,
-2-
PC91-27
, , ..
.1. Th~t etroet lighting far.ilit~QC~ ~~long Adele Streat ohall be installed as
reguireci by the Utilitf~s Ganeral Mang~r in accordanca with
~~ cacificatior~H on fil~ in the UE1'ico of the Utilit.tea Genernl Manoger.
i~~ instttllation shall bc~ c~mpleted within on~ hunclrEad a.igt~ty (180) daye
.r.on, the dat~~ of ~~hir~ rQnolution.
5. + That tho k~ropo~al ahall con+ply with all oigning requLremFr~to ~f the CL
"Co-nmc~rcia~, L.lmit~d" Zone, un.ima~ a varianco ull.owinq Htgn wai.vors iA
approved by t!~~ City Co~nc? 1, Plar,ning Commi~suioyi or 2oning
Admini~+trat~r•.
6. ThaL any exiHting or praposed freest~~ncting p.ign on nubject property ehall
be monument-type n~t ~xce~d.irig eiq!~t (F3) f~et in height and ~hall bE~
subjpct t.o Che review and ~~pprnval of Ctte C~ty TYaffic Enginc3or ta
der.ermine .~dequac.e lines-~E-flight.
'1. That the m~~dul.~r off.~c~c~~ Craiier lncar.ed on-~ito ahall be remove~.
f3. 'i'hat p~,r~kin~~ agreem~nt (~i ) f o-- the min i~num one hundrpd aev~n~y f i.vo (175 )
~f £-~itf~ ~arki.ny apaceES •-+ppro~~ed in con~uretion with thLa requQSt ehall
b~~ rsub~nitted t.o thn Zon.ir:rJ Divinior, f.or reviE;w ~nd approv~~l by `_he ~ity
rlttor~ey'fl O:Yice.
~). That: subject pro~ercy nhall be clevr~:oped 3ubntani:ially in accordance with
plana and apecificatfona submitted to t"e City of Anaheim by the
petitir_~nF~r ar~d whi~•h planc~ a~.•e on :i2e with the P.lanninq Department
i~ar.Y.ed E:chibit ;to~. 1, 2~r.~~ 3, pr•ovidec:, however, chat box treee o:~all
k~ placed in~i nai.nt~ineri in rhe ~!aved area alonq Anaheim Eioulevard.
10. That Cor,dition t~rao. 1, S, 7~~nd 8, atiovp-mentioned, shall b~ conpleted
within a F~er. ioci c~f nir~~ty (90) da/~ from the d~~te of thiB resol~tion.
11. 'i'hat Cc~nc!icion 170. 4, at,ove-~nentione<2, et?ali be completed within a paiiod
c~ ~~nc_• hunclrrd eiq~itr ( iFiO) c3ayr3 fror,~ t!:e ~3ate uf Lhis re~solutiar~.
t?.. :'ha~ Conditicn tsc~. 3, .~t~ove menr!oned, c~h~~ll be corr,pleted by Septemb3r
1:' , .9'~ 1 .
t;. Thar. thi.~ cc~r~diLic~nal t:se }•n_rmit ahall bc± granr_ed far ~ per.od of Lwo
years until Febru_ary 25, 1993; provided, however., that oxtonsione of time
may be reyue~*_ecl :~ncJ m~~r t~~a rarans-.erf °or additional two (2) year p~trioda
14. t Tha+, r~ppr~~v~: ~,f. t_F~iss ~F~E~I i:.;~tion conetit~tes .zpprovaL of th~ prop~~sod
;F~quEfsC c~nly tc; ttie exr.ent that it r,~mplie~s wit.h the Anaheim Ni~nicipal
'Lonir~g C~d~~ anc; any othcar applicaGle Cfty, Srate and ~ederal.
requ.'aci<~nc-. ^.E~pr.oval dc~ctl no' lr.clccie any artion nr findinge a~s to
complianc~ or a~pr•-~va1 of the r.e~~eet cc±garding nny other applieable
:~rdinance, requlztir~n c~r r-~:;ui:ement. Concfiti~;r.~r markc~d with an aatorink
~*) rir~ rc~~uiccd b~ ~s*_abl iEahF•ct lt-wt~, r.odea, rnqu3~tionA ~-nd c~qrpemonts
J(1(.~ ill'E?~ ~.hr.refOCC~~ f1f1L f3li~)js?tiL t0 r~~~~~oti~tion.
-3 - P(;~2-27
~ ~
f!E IT FUIt'TFIER RESGLVFD that tha Anahei.m City Plan~ting Commieeion
doeA hereby find and determ.tne that ad~pr.io» of thi.e Fto~soluti.~n i,o exprasnly
pred.~catad upon appli.cant~4 complianc~ wS.th ogch and nll of tho cnndition~
herdinabove aet forth. Should uny auch condition, or any part tl~ere~F., be
dar)aror] lnvalid or tinenforc.eabla by the fli~al judgment of any court of
competent jurfadtction, then thio Rc+eolution, and any opprovals hdz~ain
contain~d, shall be deemed null. nrid vo~d.
'IEIE FOREGOING f2ESOL~UTION wac~ adoptr~d at the Planning Commi.sdion
mooti.ny of FQbru~ry 25, 1991.
, , ,'~ _
_.... _~.___~._ . _._.____. ....._.~.. ..._._ :~~ ~._._ _. .~
CHA7RWOMAN, ANAFiEIM CITY PLANNZVG COMMISSION
ATTF:ST: ~ ~ _ ;~
_ _ .~:~' ^ .i . ~,~----•' _ ~1.,~ r_~` . ` <. y -
SECRF.IARY, ANAHEIM CITY FLANNiNG CUMMISSION
STA'PF: OF' CAI.TFORNIT, )
C^UNTY 4F' ORANr,E: ) ~~:~ .
CI'I'Y OF ANAEiE:IM )
I, Rdi.th I.. flarriP, Secrptary of the Anaheim Cfty Planning
Cc~mmis~ion, do hez•~oy ce~-ti!~ that •.he for~gotny rQSOlution wag paosed and
adoptec9 ar_ a mec~tinq of the Ana;:~im City Ylann'_ng Conuniseion hel_d on February
25, 1991, by ttie following vote of the ~+embern therPOf:
AYE.S: COMMISSIONERS: BOURS, AOYU:TUN, ~Ir,1.I,Y'~.k, E~ENNINGER,
MESSE, PF,RAZA
NOF:S: COMMIS5IONEi?5: ::ONE
AE9SEtiT: COMMISSIOIJFRS: FELDtiAUS
~~ WITt7E::.`, HHCRF.OF, I hav~ here~~nto ~~t m;• 1-and t:~ie ~~ ~•~, day
u f _-->1~~.::.~..:..~. ~ 1991 . ~
.~~._....~__~!~C. i ~ , { _ ~ lYL. ~~ L- t ~ I . .- ~
~
S~CRF,TARY, ANAHk;IM CITY YLRNNING COMMISSION
-~3- PC92-27