Resolution-PC 91-43FtCSOI.,UTION IVO; PC9J.~43
A RE~OLUTION OI' 'THE ANRHf YM CITY P.Lp1VNIrIG COMMSSSIObI
TFiA7' I~E'PT'i'TUN 1~OR CONUITIONAL USE PERMlT NC. 3396 BE GRANTED
WHERI:AS~ t}~e Analieim City Planrii.ng Commiaeion did x~QCeivQ a
vc~rified Puci.tion for. Cond.it.ional UaQ Pesmit for cortain real property
c~ituated i.:~ the City ot Anahc~.tm, County of Urange, St~te of Californla,
described as:
I~UT G'2 Ol' TRACT .1646 .AS PER MA.Y ItLCURD~D ItJ F300K 106,
PAGT:S 16-18 OF MISCF:LLANFJOUS MAPS, AS I'TLED IN TNE
OFkICE; OF TH~ COUNTY Rb;CORD'r~R OF SAIU COUNTY.
F][~IF,R~:F,s, the Ciky Planning Commi~sic~n ~id hold a raublic hearing
at the: Civic Ct~nter in the Cit.y of Ariaheim oi: Marc:h ?.5, 1~92, at 1:30 p.m.,
not i.ce of aaid ~~ubl.ic hF~aring haviny been duly gi.vE~n as reguired by law r~nd in
accordance ~oitt; the pr~visior~~ of the Anaheim Municipal Cod~, Chapter 18,03, to
heax• and consider evidenr_e~ for ~ind agai.nst said proposed conditional uAe pQxmit
~~nd to inve3~igate and make f.indi.ngE z;nd recommendationg in connection
thc~r~wit.h; and
WkIERCA3, r~nid CnI11Ci11F3J1.OT1~ after ~ue inapectivn, in•rest.tgAtion and
:.study mac:le by it:3elf and in ito behalf, and after due consid[~ration of al.t
evidence and re~orrn offerecl a~ da.id h~ar.inc~, doen fii:d and dQtermine the
foil~~wing £acts:
1. 'I'hat thE~ propo~ed u~e i.r~ pronerl~• one for which a condiL•iana]
uH~ permit i~ authorizc~d by Califurnia Co•/e%timenk Code Section 65852.1 tu
permit a 616 aq.ft. "granny" unit.
'l. 'Phat the proE~osed u~•E will r~ot adveraely affect the
ad.joining Land Uf3E?P, and th~ ~rawth ar,c~ development of ~he aroa i~t whi;;h it ia
proposse~j tc~ be loc~tr~d,
3• 'I'hat th~ aizc~ and sha;~e of tiee eit~ prrapos~vd for the uee
ia adequate to ,Zllow the Cuil developm~ent of ttie pruponed une S.n a mannpr not
da~ri.m~?ntal to the ~.~articul3r are<3 noc• to thc~ peace, health, oafety and gensral
w~lface of the Citizenc~ ~F thcs City of AnahQim.
4. I'!~at the~ granting of the Conditivnal Us~ Permit under the
aonditi:~na i_mpoaed, i.f any, will not be detrime~tal. to hhQ peace, health,
nafer_y az,d yer~era.l welfare of' th~ Citizena oL the City of Anaheim.
5. ThaL thc~ ~raffLc generatecl by th~ proooae~ use will not
~mE~o:~e an uticiu~~ burden upon the aL•reeL-s and highwvyc+ deoignQd and improved to
carry the traffic in the are~.
6. 'ih<it no or,r• indicated ~heir pre~ence al• ~3id publ±c
hear.:ng fn oF~pur~.ir_ic:n; anrl r_ha~ no corre~pond~nce waa rer,eived :.n opposition to
th~ ~ub j~c:t p:±t.it.i.on.
CR1145MP -•1- PC91-43
~'r1'r'~xq
~~'
CAL'II'ORNIA F.NVIR~NM~I.V't'AL 'JALITY A(;~f FINDING: '.Che Plann~.ng Llirec~t:,r
_-..~.~._.._.--
or h,.n authorixed reprc~3entat3_vca haE deter•rr;.~nrd that the pruposed pzojdcL• fa:.ls
wit•hin the definition ofi C~itegorical Exemptione, Claae 3, ao d~fined in the
State ~IR Guidelin~:s and is, i:hereforc~, categori.~ally ex~m~>t fr~~m the
requirement r..~ prepzre an ~Ik.
NOW, THEREFpRG, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Cit:y P].ar-nirig
~7ommission doeFl hc;reby grant au~jecr Petitic>n For Coriditional Uee Pe~rmit., upcn
t:he following conditiona which are h~:reby found to be a nAcessar.y gzerecuioite
to L-he propos~ed us~ of the suUject proper.t.y :Ln order tc:~ preo~3rve the eafe~y sn~9
yeneral welfare of the Citi.zena oE thQ ~ity oE Anah~im:
1. That a traah st:arage area ahall be pro~iidc~d fur dolid wa.e*e eollec~ton
cor~ta.iner:~ (ane far tr.a:~h and one for recXcling) and ahall bc~ knpt out of
~~ublic v±.c~w.
2. * 7'hat f i.re 3prinkler. r~ e~hall be iniatallF,d ac~ rQquirad by the rire
~eparl-ment. A .l3-D type ~3yA~em i.s accepLable.
3. ThaY, the p:.•c?po~ed ~tructure shal.l m~~i.nt~~in a c1Par ten (10) fc+ot public
utility easement along thc e~~at ar~d Routheast groperty lir.e~ or. a3
ot.herwine requi.recl by the Pu~lic ;lti.lit:ie:~ DFpartment.
4. *'1'hat the legal owne:r of aubject property shal.l reatrict ttie occupan~y of
`.he gr.~nny un.it to one (1) ar tw~ 12) ad~ilts, both of whom are sixty (60)
yeara of age or older, and shall npecify that n~ rental fe~a ehall be
ct~aryed for occupancy of the grann;~ unit and fiirt:her.mor~~, eha.ll zocozd an
un~ubordinated covetiant againnt the property eu restrictiny the oc;cupancy
of aaid unit. 5:iic1 covenant shall be e~~bmitted to the 2oning Diviaion for
transmittal t;o ttie C.ity Attorney~~ Of~i.c~ for review and a~proval prior to
r~cor.da+:ian. Yroof of rErcordation ehall then k~e submitted to the Zaning
Divic~ ion.
5 Ttia~ uub ject pr-ope~-ty ahal.l. be ~lc~veJ.oped aul~atantiaily in accordance with
pl~zn3 and :+pec~if.iceitions submiL•ted ~o ttie rity oE Anah~!im by the
peG!tioner and which plans are on fi.le with the Planning pepartment marked
Exhib.it No. 1.
G. That priar uo i3:~uance ot a bu_ilding permit or within a period of one (1)
yc~ar from thc~ date of thin resol.ution, whichever uccura first, Conditfon
No. 4, ~b~ve-mentfoned, :~hall bE~ c~mpl.i.ed with. fxten~ions for further
time to compl.ete oai.d condi.tions r~ay be gr.3nted in accordance with Se:;tion
1a.03.09U of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
7. Tt:at pri.or. to f'inal. bu.ilciiny an~i zoning innpect:ions, Condition No~. x, 2,
3 and 5, ~zbave-me,~L• ioned, r~hall bE; complied with.
E3. " That approval ~~f thi~ application cansr.ituteo approval of the propoBed
zeq~aer~t only t~ L•he extent that ;.k compl.iea with tha Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Cc~dn ;.nd any other a~plicaUle ~it:y, Statc~ and Faderc~l rc~gulatione.
A~,ptoval does not inc:ludW any ~ction or findings ao ta compliance or
appioval of the reque~t regarding any other applicab:..e aru.inance,
reyulation ~r requi.rement. Cr~nditions markPd with an ssL•ar~s)t (*) are
r.~iqui.red by ec~tabli~hed laws, codcs, rtgulaticna ~~nd aqream~nt.c~ and are,
th~~r~:or~, not t3uhjert to negot•iation.
-2-
1PC91-43
,,,a;r,; ~ ,~~"~?'+~
flE IT FURZ'H~R RE:SCILVFD that the Anuheim City Planning Commiesion
does hereby f5.nd and deter.mino that adop~i.c;ci of thi.s Reeolutian io expresely
prc~dicated ~ipon appli.cant's compliance with each and t~ll of the c~nd~.tiona
herein~bove set forth. Should any such aondition, or any part thereaf, be
dnclarQd invalid cr unenforceablo by th~ fina]. judgment of any court af
competpnt juri.sdicti.~n, then thie Reeol.utioti, and any approvala h~r.oi.n
r.on~sined, shall be de~me~i null nnd void.
THE t~'ORL'GOING RESOLUTTC~ io ac3opted at the Planniny Core,mission
mec~t.ing of March 25, 1991.
. ~ ~
~j/~, (~..( <. ~_:~ :~. ~~J-7y'<-~~,t_. C<c,~.~ `
Ci~AIRh~OM?1N, ANAI~ESM CITX PLANATING CUMMISSION
ATT~S'P: ~ _
/~
-----~ u-~r.-~i~~~/~` ~~l.C.%l..L.c_, _.
SECRFTARY, ANAHEIM t~ITY b'LANNING CUMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFURNT't1 )
CO[;NTY OF ORANGE ) ~:~ .
CITY OI ANAH~IM )
I, ~d.ith L. Harri~, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Cammieoz.on, do h~~reby certxfy thal the foregoing resolution ~as paesgd and
adopted at a meeting of t,he Anaheim Ci.ty Planning Comm9.ssion he].d on March 25,
1991, by tlie fc~llow.ing vatn of ~he mc:mbera thereof:
AYE:S: c,OMM:[SSIONERS: BOU71S, 80YDSTUN, HELLYEF2, H~NNINGER,
MF.SSE, PERI~ZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
AEiSENT: COMMISSTONI:R5: I'1:LQHAUS
:IN WITNE:S.~ WHEREOF, I have hereunto c~et my hand thie ~^ .C~'~ day
of ~`~~~, 1991. -,
c._. l:
~ - t_ ~ ~ ~
------~' / ' ~ , --~ - ~Z
SEC1tETARY, AtVAHEIM CITY PLANNING rc',MMISSION
-3- PC91-A3
~