Resolution-PC 91-51,,*~o
RESOLUTION NOs PG91_„5J,
~
A RE30LUTIdN QP' Z'HE AN.T~IiEIM CITY FLAN;IING COMidI5SIGN
THAT FE'rITION FOF2 CONDIT7:ONAi U5E P~R2~SI7' NO. 3401 BE GRANTED
WHEREA5, the Anaheim City Planning Cominieaion d.id r~ceive Gi
veri£ied Petition tor CondiY.ional Ude ~ermit f~r curtain r~al proper.ty
situatQd in the Ci.ty of Anahaim, County of Uranqe, State ot Califoznxa,
C88CL~ibed ae:
PAFtCEL 1: UNT2'S ]. THRU 7, 9 THFtU 12, Z5 THRU 2Q AND
22 TFiRU 29 INCLUSIVE, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CRLIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A CbNDOMINIUM PI,AN RECORD~D
MARCii ?C, J.982, AS INSTRUMENT NO. F~2-109581, OFFIC:CFIL
RECORDS OF ORANGF~ CQUNTY, CAL'IFORNIA.
PARCEL 2~ E~AIZCEL 3 ANU PA22C~T,S 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL M}1P
NO. 82-251, TN Z`HE CI'PY OF ANAHEIlZ, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATF O~ ~ALi~'ORNIA, AS uHOWN bN A MAP FILEU YN BOUK
17~' PAGES 24 THRU 26 INCLUSTV~, bF P?1RCEL MAPu, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE (:OIJNTY RECQR~ER OF SAID COUAITY.
FXC5PT7NG FI20Di FARCEL 2, UNIT5 1'!'O 29 TNCLUSIVE, AS
SHOWN ON A CONQQMINIUM PLAN RECORDED MARCH 20, 1992,
AS INSTRtTMENT NO. 82-109581, OFrII.'TAL RECORDS Or SATU
COCiNTY .
WHEREAS, the Ci.ty Planning Commi.ssion did hold a public hear.fng
at th~ ~ivic Center in the City of Anaheim ori April 72, 1991, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public h~aring having beer- duly gi~~en as requi~ed by law and i.n
ac.cordance with th~ pr~visions of the Anahei.m MunicipaZ Code, Chapter 18.03, to
hear a~td consider ~evidence f~r and againFt said propa~ed canditi.onal use permit
and to iciveetiga~e and make findinga and rec~imm~r.dationo iit connection
the~cwith; and
WHEREAS, ~aid Commiosior.~ after c:u~~ i.nep~ction, inv~atigation and
atudy made by itself and in itn behalf, ~,ir~~~ ~fter due oonsideration o~ a].1
evidence and repo•rt•s offered ~t gaid hearing, doss fin~ and detexmine the
toLl.owing facta:
1. That the propoeed uAe ie properly one for which a ronditfonal
use permit ia suthorized by Anaheim Municipal Cade Section 18.61.050.614 to
pArmit a church with accee~ory echuol use in an exiating induatrial bui.lding.
2. That the ~ropo~ed use ia hereby granted for m pc~riod of three
(3) ysars ro ~xpire on April 22, 1994, unlser~ time extPrsions are requesteti and
granted for a maximum ef two additional 3-year period~.
3. ':hat the pYOposed uoe wil..l nat adversely af~ect th~ a3joining
land use~s and the yrowth ar,d de~~elopment of the area in which ic is propoesd t!;
be located.
CR1 ].59MP
-1-
PC41-51
~:
~ !' ~C M
'~ ~t!" ~ ~..~.
~f+SY'~
4. That the aize and shapc~ of the si+:e prQpoeed £ox the use is
adequa~+;e to a11ow the fu~.l. development o£ ~h~ propoeed uee in a mannez not
detrimental to tho particular r~rea noz• to Lh~ peace, hoal~h, eafety and c~oneral
welfare of the Citizerie o:E i~he City of Anaheim.
5. That tlie gr.anting o~ the Conditional Uae Permit uiider tho
conditioiye impused will not be dptrimnntal to th~ peace, hea.lth, r~afety and
general welfarR of the Citi.zene ~f the City of Anaheim.
G. Tha•t the traffic ganer.at2d by the propoeed use wilY not
impose an undue burden upon the stz~eete and highwayd designed ~na improved to
carry •Che ~raf'fic in the area.
7. Th.:~t no one indicat~d the.~r pr~aet~ce at said public hearing
in oppueition; and tha~ no correopondence was received in opp~ai~ion to the
subjeck. pet.ition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONI~k;NTAL QUAI.ITY ACT FTNDING: Th~t the Anaheim
City Pldnning Commioaiori haa ze•~iewed the ~roposal to permic a church w.i.th
acceseory school usQ in an exieting induRtrial buildiag on an
irregularly-shaped par.cel of land conc:istiny of approximately 9.5 3CL'E?8~ having
appz•cximate frantages af 388 f.Et.t or. the ~out.hwoat eide cF Tustin Avenue and
280 feet on ihe north side of Grove Stre~:t, having a maximum dopth of
~ approximately ~03A f.eet, b~ing located appr~ximately 1£i0 feet eouth of the
centerl.ine o.E t~iraloma Aveaue a.nd futtyer ~legcribed ae l.231 N~rth Tuat;.n
Hvenue; and does hereby approve i:he Negative neclaz~ation upan f.inding that it
t,ae caneidered th~ Negativ~ Declaration togFhher with any comments receiv$d
during tne public review proceas and further find:inq or, thF baais that the
initial stuc~y and any com;nents ~-eceived tha~c there is no ~ubstantial evidence
~hat the projeci: will have a significant effect an th~ envizonment.
NOW, Z'H~R~FORE, BE I~' R~SOLVED that the Anah~ir~ Citp Pl~nning
Commi.~aion door~ hQreby grant eubject Petition £or ConditioiZal UBe Fermit, upon
the following conditione whi<;h ar.e her.aby found to be a neceesary prerequiaite
to the proposed use of the aubjQCt prorertx i.n crder L•o pret~er.ve the safety and
general welfar~ of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That subject prop~rty ahall be devel~ped eubatantially in accordaricr: wi~ki
~lan~ and apecificationa submi.tted to tl~e City o.i Ana}ieim b:r the p~titioner
and which p7.ane are on file with the Planning D~partment marked Exhilait
Noe. '1 and ~.
2. That prior L•o final buildir~c~ and r.oninc~ inepectione, or prior t~
commencement uf the activity authori_zQd by this zeaolution, or within n
p~riad of one (1) year frocn the date of this resolution, whi.chsver oocurs
firs~, Condi*_ion No. 1, abovo-mentioned, ~hall b$ ccmplied with.
Exterisions for further time to r.onzpletp ~aid cond.itiona may be granted in
accordance with Section 18.03.09U of the Anaheim MuniciPal Code.
3. That this conditional use permit i~s granted for a period of. thr~a (,~~ yeara
and QF~all tarmic~ato on April 22, 1994, unlese time exten~ione are requeBtecl
and granted pursuant tc~ Code se~tian 18.61.050.614.
-2- PC91-51
~
i r~~
"~ ,~~`~ I''I
4. Tha~ approval of thi.e application conetituL•es approval o~ L•ho pr~~r~sed
requesi: o;~].y to the extAnt that it c~mpllea with the Anah~icn Munic3.pal
'Loning c;ode and uny otlisr applicak~le Ctty, Stata and Federal regulati.ons.
Appr.oval doeg not include any action or findings ~B ~~ oompJ.ianco or
approva'1 af the requsot regardine~ any other appli.cable ordinance,
zequla•ti4n or •requiz•em~nt.
BE TT E'URTIiER ~tESOLVED that the An~hpim City planning Commisaion
does hereby Eind and determine that adoption aE thie Reeolution is expre~sl.y
predicated upon apFlicant~e cUmpliance wit•h each and a11 of the conditions
, hereix~ahove eeh: forth. Should any such conditian, or any part t!~ereoP, be
, declared inval.id or t:r.ien:EorcQable by ~ha final judgment of any caurt of
competQnt jurisdiction, then this Ro~solution, and any approvaJ.e herein
contatned, sha11 be deerned nu].1 and void.
THG FOREGqIIYG RESOLUTInN waa a~opted at the Plannis~g Commiasion
me~~ing of April 22, 1991.
~
~i ~(%~; ,~~~ GP -~--
~~
CHAIF2W MAN, ANAH.EIM CTT PL:aNPJ?NG CQMMISSTON
A7'TES'T. '~
~~ ~
~ '" ; i l ~-~ ~ .
- ' ' ~ -.f~_ i t- CC, ~~ ~_,.
SF~7RETA~'tY, AATAHEIM CITY PLANNING CUMMISSIUN
STATE OF CALIFORNTA )
COU,NTY OF ORlNGE ) pe,
CTT't UF ANAHFIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, SecrEtary of th~ Anaheim City Planning
Comniiseion, do hez•eby certify tha~. the f~reg~ing reso).ut~.on was passed and
adopted at a mQeting of the Anaheim City Planning Conunisaion held on April 22,
199i,, by the fal.lpwing vote o~ the membAra therPOf:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOUAS, BQYDSTL'N, IiELLY~R, HENNIhGER,
MESSE;, PERAZA
NOES: C(1MMIS5IONERS: NONE
ABSEN'.P: COMMZSSIONERS: FELDHAUu
~j y~ IN WTTNESS WHEREQF', T hav~ hereunto set my hand this »''T~-~~'~
of _-.=C~...~~ ~, 1991. ,. , ~. aay
l~ ~-~r;. ~ ~ ~~;
- ~ ~ ~--____ r---'~,.. ~ ~._~`l_~ _ _,t, _
:'ECRET {tY, AhAHEIM CITY PLANNIIYf; C0.4MI~S
ION
-3 PC~1~51