Resolution-PC 91-586~
~~
RESOLUTIUN NO __P~:'91-58
A RESOLUTION OI' THG ANAHEI~F! CTTY PLANNfCVG COMMISSTON
TEiAT Y~TITTON F~R CONL~ITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3387 SE D~NIEB
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commiseion did receive a
ver.iFi9d Petition for Canditinnal U~se P~rmit f~r r,er~ain real property
oituatad i~~ the City ~f AnzhRim, Caunty ~f Oa-ange, State oP California,
dPSCZihed as:
L~O'PS 3 ANll 4 OI' TFACT NC~. 255 OF THE FAST AI~AHEIM
S[1BDIVTSION, CI'PY ~F ANAtiETM, COLThTY QF 012ANGE, STATE
Ob' CALTFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECG2tAE;D IN BOUK 14, PAt.E: 7.5
OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN `fflE OFk'ICE OF TH~ COUNT~
RECORDER TO SAJD CnUNTY.
WHEREAS, the r.ity Plarin.ing Commteoi~n did h~ld a public hearing
at th~ ~ivic Conter in the City of Anaheim on February 25, 1991 at ].:30 p.m,,
n~i:ice ~i eaid public hearing hav.ing been dul,y given a~ required by .taw and in
ac;cordanr.e with tho provieiona of thc Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter .18.Q3,
to he~zr and conaidQr evidence for and ag,~i.nat s~ai3 propoaed cociaitional use
parm`.t and to ia~~c~atigate and make finding~s and recomm~ndati~ne in ca~nection
tt~srPwith; and that oai~ publir. }~earing wae continued to th~ March 25 and
May 6, 1991, Planning Commieoion rt~eetings; and
WfIER~AS, said Commiaa.iGn, after due inap~ction, investigatian
and etudy made by i~self and in i~e behalf, and aftez duo coneicleration nf all
evidence and rep~rt~ offc~red ar, Aai~ haar.ing, does find and determine th~
followiny facts:
1. That the propoaed ueo f~ praPe.rly one for which a
conditional uso per~t~it i~ authoriz~d by AnahP.im Municipul Code Section
18.41.d50.200 to permit a cel.lul~r tel~phone facility incl.udiny a 60-foot high
R~onopole wl.th waiver~ of the following:
(A) SECTIONS 16_06.05J.0212 - Minimt~m number of parki~.s aces.
1f~.06.Ot10 (29 required; _?.7 propoHed)
ar~d 18.41.06b.0~0
(H) SE;CTION 18.41.063.030 - Re,c~uirec~ yat:i ~etblek.
(minlmum 1Q f.eet required from inteziar
properly linea; nane propoar~d)
~. Th~t thP propoaed uae io hereby d~niad.
3. That the requaated wa.ivors (A) and (e) are hereby :Ieriied
b~cause subject uso3 permit waa denled.
4. Thar tiio
r.eai.dentia2 land u~ee and
is propoead to bg locat•ed.
proposed uae will. adversely affect the adj~ining
the growth and dPVelo~men:: of the area irz ;~-hich it
CR.1167MP -1- PC91-53
~ '~
5. That tho ei~o and ahape of the ait~, proposed for the uae ±g
not adequRtQ tu a11ow tha full develo.pmont of the propueed uoe in a manner nat
detrimental to th~ particular area nor to L•he pAace, health, t~afety and
general wel£a.r~a aE the Citizc~na of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the arantiny of the Conditionz]. Uea Per:mit will b~s
detrimental to the pPace, health, ~~~~ety and goneral welfare ~f the Citiz~n~
of th~ City of Anaheim.
7• That r_c~ one in:iicatod their prQ4enc:e At eaid public
hearing in ogpoeit.ion; and t;iat no c:orre~p~nder~ce was x•ece.ived in oppueition
to the eubject patition.
CAI~IFORNII4 GNVIRONMENTAL QUt1T,T~PY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim
City Planninq Comm,tsdion ha~ reviewod the prcpoea.t to permit a cellular
teleptiune f.acility including a 6Q-foot }ii_gh manupole with waivere of minimum
number ~f. parki.nq c~pacea and requirec~ yar.d setback on an irregular.ly-aha~ed
parcel of land consietirig of approximately 0.51 acre located orx the nortltaaet
rorner of C~nter Stroet an~.i CofFm~n Street, tiaving approximate frontage~ ~f 67
feet ~n the north ai.de ~f ~enter Street and 190 fe~t on the east si.de of
Coffman Street and further doscribod ss 1901 Eaet Center Str~et; and doee
kiereby approve thQ tl~rative Aeclaration upon finding that i.t hae cc~neiderec
tho Negative lle,claration tog~ther with any co:nmente raceived during ~he public
rev.ieco pr~cess and further finding on the baei.s that the initial otudy and any
comments received that thera is n~, subetai~t~.al evidence that the project will
have a eignifiaant efiect on the envi.r.ociment.
NOW, THEitFFORE, BE IT RESOLVED r.hat the Anahelm City Planning
Commie~sion doQa tiQreby deny aub~ect Petition for Conditional Ur~e Permit, on
the baeiE~ o£ thQ aforem~ntioncd findinge.
THE FOREGUING R~SULUTIC>N was ado~ted r~t tho Planninq Commission
m~~oting o~ May 6, ]991.
,~ -~ ,
~ , ,
// / / i J
.~' ~-~~ . E::l:~.<, /~- ~,~.~:...i
CHAIRWO N, ANAHEIN CT'PY 1dLANNING CO'KMISSION
A'PTES'I': 'r
~..;
_~~' /,
_ E ~.~ .~' .Y-~~ `~/ '""; I ~'t. , t ,. ..
SF.CRETAI2Y, t1NAHEIM CITY PL' }1N:JING COMMISSTON
-2- PCyI-5$
i~. f rt4~~ rl ~~MAkry
r `
STATE OF CALIFGRNIA )
COUNTY OF ORFING~ ) ~tg.
CITY OF ANAHE:I.i )
I, Edith L. Harrie, ~ecr~tax•y of the Anaheim Cit~r Planning
~ommiopion, do hereby certify that the faregoing resolution wae paesed and
aclopted at a me~t~.ng of the Anaheim City P].anning Cornmiedion tield on May 6,
1991, by the following vote of th~ membAra thereof:
;:.;
AYES: COMMISSIONER°: F~LDHAUS, HELLYEF2, HEIJPJIN(~,ER, MESSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSTONF.RS: BOYDSTUN
ABST?~INED: COMMISSI~NERS: BOUAS
l,BSENT: COMMISSTONERS: NONE
I;1 WITNESS WHI;FtEOF, I have hereuntu set my ha.nd tt~is ~~-~ ~=~~~ day
of 1" , 1991.
___ (1 ____ __._ ~ ~ _ ,~ v •
~.~~~_!~ `' 1~ ~L.~c.~-~-Y
, SECR~TARY, A,NAHEIM ~ITY PI~ANNING GOMMISSTON
' ~ ~ .'." ~ .,,.,~.'~1h':l~,,
t•^
-3- PCa1-58
, ~,