Resolution-PC 91-75kLSULUTION NO. P~91-~5
A RESOLUTION Or THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSTON
Tf?AT rETITTUN FOR RECLASSTFICATiON NO. 9U-97~27 AE GRANTEU
WFi~FtEAS, the Aaaheim C~.ty Planning Ca~mniea ton did reoeiv~ a
~..-
veriEied ~etition for Rec.l.ac3~ific~tion far real prop~~rty ~situated in thP C~.ty
of Anaheim, Cour~ty of Orange, State of Californi.a, descx.ibed as follows:
LOT h Or 7'RACT NO. 13129, TN TEir CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF' ORANGF., :;TATE OF' CIII,Ik'URNIA, AS PER MAF
RECdRllED IN BpOIC 612, PAGES 32 AND 33 OF M:iSCEI.LANEOUS
M7~NS, IN 'iHE OFFICE OF T'rI~ COUNTX RECORDER dr^ SATD
COT_INTY .
WHEFEAS, the City Planning Commio:~ion did hald a pub].ic hearir.g
at t.he Civic Center in khe City of Anahei.m on June 3, 1y91 at ?.:30 p,q~,,
noti.ce of aaid pu:ilic hearing havi.~ng been d~~ly ~iven as required by law and ici
accordancv with th~ provi3.i~nr~ of the Anaheim Munir.ipal Cc~de, Chapter lEi.03,
to hear and conoider evidence far and against a~.i.d pr.opos~d reclasaification
and ta invc~atigate and make findinyK :~nd recommendations in connecti.on
therew.i~ti; and
WFiE[~E~S, ~air~ Commi~aion, af.ter due :Ln~pect.ior:, investigation
and stui9y mad~ by it5elt and iri its behalf, ar,~ after due consi.deration of a.ll
evidence and rapart:s offered at said hearing, daes find and determine the
following fact~:
1. That thr pr~t.it°_oner propoaea reclassi;:ication of the
SULIt}lE'ClY approximately 2, 2,0 3quare f~et of eut~jec* property from thQ
Fts-A-43,000(O)(FP) (Resi.dential, Agr.icultural-oil l~roduction and Flood Ylain
Ov~r.lay} Zone to the RS-500J(O)(FY) (Residenti~7., Sinc~le-Fam.ily-Ofi Production
and Flood Plain Overlay) or a lesr~ intense zone.
2. That the Analieim General Plan de3ignate~ aub;ect property
for Low-Mcdium I)ensity Residenr.ial land u~ea.
3. That thr_ propoc~ed r~nc.las~ificaticn ct subject FrcperY.y .ie
ns~cesaary and/~~r de«irabLe for thc arderly and proper d~velopment of the
community.
~t. 7'hat: t}ie progo~~d r•eclasaificati.on of Hubject proppr_ty do~s
pr,nperly relate L-o Lhe zoneo and their p~±rmitted ur~es loca;.ly esi.ablished in
close proximi.ty to aubj~ci: pro~~crty and ta the zanes ai:d their pNr.mitted uses
ger.era.lly e~t~ibli3hed throughnut the community.
Ck1199MP
+'.- PC91-75
^~
; ~~,~,
5. Thak no one~ ind~.cated their presonce at eaxd ~ubli.c hearing in
oppo~ition; and that, no c:oi-rec~pondence wzs~ recoiv~d zx~ oppoeitiun to subjQCt
petition.
CALIFC~HNIA EN~IRONM~NTAL ~UA.LITY ACZ' FiNDJNG: That the Anaheim
Cit}• Planning C~mmis3.ion h~zs reviewed the proposal to reclaeeify l:hc~ aouthorly
~ppL•oxirnate].y 2,25~ square Peet of subject property froir~ the RS-A-43,000(O~(FP)
(Ftesider~tial, Agricul.tural-Oi.l Pruduc~ion arid k'loocl Plairi ove.rlay) Z~ne to the
I25°5000(U)(FP) (Re3ident.ial, Gingle-Family-Ozl Prnduction a~id E'lo~d P1ain
Overlay) and to permit a da~e±llin~ in a designateci :looc~plain Overl~y 2c~ne on an
irregu.larly-shaped parcel. of land consiat.tng of approximataly 0.142 acr,e,
having~ an approximate fr~ntag~ of 1~0 feet or~ the weat sid~ of Sub~ch Street,
having a:naximu;n depth of 150 feet and being lc~cated 730 feot north af the
centerl..ine of Orangethorpc Avenue~ and doea hereby approve the Negative
Der~laration upon find~ng that it~ hae conoidered the Neqat~.vQ Der.laration
t~gether with any commen~e receivep diirirq ttie public review proce~e and
turth~r finding on the baaie i;haL• the initial. arudy a:~d ~ny comments rec~ivec3
that there is no sub~tanti~.l evidence that the projer.t wil:l have a signif.ir.anl
~~ffect an the onv.ironmer.t.
~'OW, TEILTiEI'OE2E, R1; IT HESOLV.Eb Lltat the Anaheim City Planning
Commission doee herehy g.r~nt aubject I~etitian for Rnclassifir_atior~ ~Znd, by so
doing, that Titl~ 18-7.oning o_*' th~ Anaheim Muniripal Cade be amer~ded to exclude
the above-described proper~.y from tl~e RS-A-43,OG0(Oy(FP) (Residerttial,
Ag.ricultural-Uil Froduction and I'luod Plain Ov~rlay) 7.one arid •~o inc~rporate
said cleiacribed property into the RS-500U(O)(FP) (Reyidontial, Single-Family-
Oil Prod~ach.ian and Floou Pla.i.n Uver•Lay) Zune upon the followi.ng candition which
i~ hereby found to be a~iece~sary pr~requisite to the proposed use of subject
proper.tv in Arder to pr.~serve the s~fety and general welf.are of the Citizens of
the Ci.ryo uf Anat-,ei.rn:
1. ThaL- appraval of thi~; application coitntilu~es approval of tiie propoeed
request onl.y to ti~e ext~nt that it compliea with *_he Anaheim Municipal
'Laning Code and any other applicable City, State and Fed~ral r.~guiations.
Approval dc~es not include any action or findi.ng~ a~ to compliance or
aaproval. ui thc~ reque~~ r.eyarding any other applicaUls ordinanr.e,
r.eyulation or. requi.remenL•.
BL 7T FURTFiER RGSOLVEn Lhat i:he An~~heim C~ty Planni.ng Commi~~ion doea
hereby find and deter.minH thai: adoption of this Itesoluki.on ia ~xpre~sly
predi~ated uron applicant'a compliance with each and al~ of the conditionr~
here.inabove ~~.~t fort-}i. Shculd any o~~cli corldition:~, or any par~, ttiereof, be
declared invali_d or un~nforcc~ab.l~ by the ficial judgment of any court of
c~mpetent juriacii.ctivn, then thi~ R.eS~luti.on, and any apprr~val.s iiere.in
contained, shall Ue dc~em~-~d null and void.
'2' PC91-75
; ~~
r'itik.`
°`~'''~'?
THE FOREGOI[VG RGSOLl7TTQPI wan adopttd at tho Plannin4,7 CnmmiesiUn
meeting o2 JunQ 3, 199i. '~ -
~~'~ .~'! ~ / ' .' ~ ,~/,~i y /i '~-.-^- 1
/I_''/~~G, ~('~~i.J , ~... ` ` t. !i''~.rCL.+'(,~.t..C~[~i
~ '^' f_~..
CHAJRWOMAN, ANAFSrIM CI'P PT,ANNIIdG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
- r .. ..._,
. .,,.~ , .:..5 '' ~ .
~-r~-~.~ _.3::. ~ .,. _ ~
S~Q•FTARY, yAt1AHE,'IM CITY PLANNI;IG COMMISSION
STATE OF GALIF'OR~IIA )
COUNTY OF OF.ANGF ~ ~s,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
T_, :tanPt L. ~ense~:, Secretary of the Anahc~im City Planning Commiseion,
dr~ her~by certify that L-he foregoing r~aolution wag passed an3 adopted at a
meeting nf tha AT)Sh~im City Pla~inir~y Comrnission held on J~.ine 3, 1991, }~y the
follow.ing voL-~~ of the membero r.hereof:
AYk~S: COMMISSSON~F2S: HOYpSTUN, BQUAS, F~;LDcIAU.i, EiELLYER, FIENNTNGER,
MESSE
NUF'S: COMMISSIANERS: NOPIE
A6~PNT: COMMISSIONERS: PERFIZA
~~ IN WITNESS WF?rRLOF, I have h~r.eun`_o yet my h~nd th.it~ /~~"''" day
of ~~:~.~.-~'- . _, 1991 .
~ ~ - .,
--fi~==-~~=-=- --L--~-~~=~= -''
St7CRETARY, ANAHEIM~CITY PLANNIN3 COMMISSION
..3- PC91-75