Resolution-PC 92-100RESQI.UTIOj~I NO. PCy2-1~Q
A RESULUTION pF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANPVING COMMISSION
THAT PETI710N FOFl VARIANCE NU. 4192 BE CRANTED
WHER~IS, the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon dfd receivo a verNled Petition for
Va~lanco ior certain real proparty situatod in the Cfty of Anaheim, County of Orange, Stato o~ Calitoml~
descr(bed as:
PARC~L 2 IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE l7F
CAUFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 84, PAGES 5 70 8
INCLUSIVE AF PARCEL h1APS, IN'fH~ OFFICE OFThIE CGUN'fY RECOFDER OF
ORANQE CDUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, tho Cfty Planning Comm(sston did hold a public hearfng at the Clvic Center in
the City of Anaheim on Auguat 24 , t992, et 1:30 p.m., notlce of said publlc hearing I~aving beon duly given
as roquired by law a~d in acconiance with the provi~lons oi the Anaholm Municipal Cocfs, Chopter 18.03,
to hear a-xl conslder evidenco tar and ogafnst sAid prqpos~ vartance and to investlgato snd make findin{~s
and recommer,datfons In connection thorewfth; and
WHEREAS, sald Commfssion, af:er due Inspection, investigatton ancJ study made by ftseif
and (n its behalf, and aft9r due considorat~nn nf atl evidence and reports oHered at sald hearing, does 8rsd
and determinn the following lacts:
1. That tho petittoner proposes waivers o! the tdluwing to construct wall signage at
a previo~sly approved rastaurant:
SoctJons 18.05.091,020 - ~Aaximum number ot vvtill ~ian,g.
and ~4}4.06?..040 u permktod In commerclal zones In tho
Scenic Corridor Ovarlay Zone; 4 proposed)
2. That the above-mentloned watver is harqby grented on basis that there ere
special circttmstancos appl(cable to thA proporty consiatinq oi the proporty's Ixation and sum~undlnps on
Imperial Htghway where access ts Ifmited to La Palma Avenue nnly (Imperlal Nighway Is a atate hiphway with
no direct vohiaular access permittod) and, theretore, the proposecl wall slpn ~n the southwost etAVatlon Is
necessary to IdentHy tha busfness to vehiclas antorir~p subJect retall center trom La Palma Avenuo end irom
the adjeaent thoater property; that, due to the anpled urtentati~n of the building, one wall afyn (generally
tacing oast) wotdd not provido adequatA v(slbllity to pedestrlan or vehicular treNic travelfng norih eixf south
on Imperial Hf~hway and, t;zerefore, wall siqna on both the northeast and southeast sides ol the bulldfnq are
a~~proprtate; orx! that tho fouRh propose~ wall sign on tha northwest elavation Is appropriate becauss the
sub~ect restaurant la ~ot visible to surrounding s;reata, and
3. 7hat strict ap~llcation o( the Zoning Codo de~,rfves the prnpRrty oi prlvilegea
en~oyed by other propertles undor fdontical zoninQ classificatlon In the vlcinlty.
4. That tha requested warfance fs necessnry tor tho p-eservatton and oniaym9nt of
a s~nstAntlal ~xoperty riqht ~wssessed by other prapeRy in tho same vlciniry and zone, erxl denled to the
properry In questfon;
5. 7F~a! the reyuRS:ec1 variance will not be ms~to-f~lly dotrimental to tha publl~ welfare
or injurlous to ihe property or improvemonts In such vicinfry ond z~na (n wtifch the Qroporty fs locat9d; and
B. 7hat no ono indicated tho;r presence at sald publl~ hoarinp In apposition; arx!
that no correspondonce was recelved In opposMion to subject petk(on
CR 1587M5.wp • 1- PC92•t 00
,~9~IFORNIA ~NVIRONMEN2A1`QUAUN_AQT FIND IUy;, The P~anninfl Director or hls
authorizod represontative has uetermined that the proposed project fall~ within the detinRion of ~:atagorical
Exemptions, CIASS 11, as detined in tho State EIH Guidellnos and Is, thoreFore, r.ategoricaily exempt from
the requiroment t~ prepare an EIR.
NOW, 7MEREFORE, BE IT RESOWED that the Anahefm CRy Planning Commission does hbreby
grant subject Petitlon fnr VoriAnce, upon the foilowing conclftions whlch are hereby lound to be a necessary
preroqulsite to the proposed use of the subJect property (n order to preserve ti~e s~aiety and generet w6liare
of the Citizens ot the City nf Anaheim:
1. ThAt subJoct property shal{ b~ devoloped substantially fn accordance wfth pians and apeclilcatlons
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitlonor and which plans are on file wfth the Planning
Departmont marked Exhib{t yos. 1 and 2.
2. That prior to Issuance of a bulld(ng permit, or wfthin a period of one (1) year irom the datu of this
resolution, Condition No. 1, above, shall he compl(ed with. Extencions for further time to completo sxkf
conditlons may be grAnted In accordance wtth Section 18.03.090 of the Anahetm Munlclpal Coda.
3. That approval oi thls app~ication constftutes approval of the proposed request oniy to the extent that
ft com~lios wlth the Anaheim Munfcfpal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Faderal
regulatlon5. Approval does not include any acti~n or findings as to compliance or approval of the
request regarding any other applicable ordinance. regulation or reyulroment.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that ihe Anaheim City PI ning Commlaslon does herdby (ind
and detormine that adoption of thls Rosolution Is expressly predic upo~i applicant's compllanr,e wfth
e~ch and all ot the conditlons herelnabovo set torth, Should any uch condftlon, or eny part thereof, ba
d9clarod Invalid or unentorcea'~lo by the 11na1 Judgment ot any,~o uf comperont Jurisdicli~n, theti this
Resolutlan, and eny approvels hereln containod, shall be do eci iull rv.f .
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was a t at t PI ng Commisston meuting of
August 24, 1992. ~ ,~ ~, /~~~,u,v1~
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY ~LANNIN¢~COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~- G~ c.:i~~-;t~s:=..~'
~ CRETARY, AN EIM CITY PLANPIING C~MMISSION
` TATE OF CP. FORNIA
S )
c:OUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
1, Janet L. Jensen, Secretary o( tlie Anaheim Cfty Planning Commission, do hereby certHy
that the foreyoing resoltdion wss passod and adoptod dt a me~tina oi the Arvaheim City Plannin4
Commfss(on hatd on Auflust 24, 1992, by tho idlowfng vote of the rnembers thereo(:
AYES: COMMIS510NERS: BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MESBE, TAiT, ZEMEI.
NOES: COMM{S310NERS: NONF
ABSEN7: COMMISSIONERS: PERA7.A
VACANCY: ONE EEI{1'
IN WITNESS Wh1ERE0F, I havo heraunto set my hnr.d this~~cay ol ~y~~
t 992.
'~ l ...,,i~
-~ RETARY, ANAH~ M CITY PIANNINCi COMMISSION
,/
.2. PC82•100