Resolution-PC 92-115,.~..
,gES~.~SZT..LQN N~.C.~?-. ~?~
A RESOLUTIQN OF THE ANAHEIM CiTY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FQR VARIANCE N0, 4197 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Anahelm City Plannin~ Commfssien dfd recalve a verifled Petitlon for
Variance for certaln real praperty sftuated in the Cfry ot Anahelm, County of Orange, Sxata oi Californla
desaribod as:
1.07 45 OF TRACT 3812, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN F300K 146 PAGES 1,
2 AND 3 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, h~ECORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, tho City Planning Commissi~n dki hold a public hearing at the Cfvic Cent~r in
the Cfty of anahelm oi~ Sopternber 9, 1992, a4 1:30 p.m„ notlce of seid public hearing having beon cJuly
given as requlred by law and in accordance with tha provisions of tho Anahelm Municipal Code, Chepter
18.U3, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance end to investlgate and make
findings and recommendatlons in connectioii therewfth; and
WFIER~AS, safd Commission, attar duo lnspection, investlgation and study made by ftsolf
and In Ito behalf, end afte-• duo considoratlon of all avidence and re~-orts oHered at said hearing, does find
ar~d determina the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes waivers o( the following to permit the addlNun of 1 bedroom
to each of four 2-bodroom units;
(A) ~$EGTIONS 1~•O6.o=~00~ ~
}~nd 18.06.080
end 18,34.Of~¢,010
(B) ~'cTIONS 18.04.060,013
and 18.34.q63.0,'~,~
fvlUimum number af tzarkin~,.@pacas.
(1~ requlred; ,~ existing)
Minimum Inndsceoe recy~irements•
2. That the above•mantionecl waiver (A) Is horeby dpnied on the basis that the parking waiver
w{II cause an increase in trattic conflestion In the immediete vicinity and advorsely atfect edJofning I~nd uses,
and that granting ot tho ptarking walver wfll be detrimental ta tt ~a peace, health, safery and general welfare
oi the citfzens af the Gity of Anahefm and could establlsh an undesirable preceden!.
3. That subject propeRy is doveloped in a loga~ nonconforming manner in torms of parking
and is deilcient in terms of the current C~do requirc~nent, and that the pruposed 1,540 square foot additio~i
consisting ot four budrooms would create e tuKher deBciency thoreby advoraely aNecting ad;ofning land
~isos;
4. That the above•mentionod waivAr (E3) is heroby denlod on the basis thet it was dole:ed
totlowing public no~Hication;
5. That the atrict appiication oi the Zoning Code does not deprfve the subJact proporty of
prNileges enJoyed by other {denticAlly zoned properties in tho victnity;
6. That there ara no exceptional or extmordfnAry cfrcumstances or conditlnn3 applfcable to
the propenry Involved or to the (r~tendeci use of the property that do not apply general~y to ths property ~r
class of use In the same vicinfty and zone;
CR 1615MS.wp -1- PC92-115
.. . ,~~,,
~ ~
7. That tho requostad variance la not necessary for the precervation and enJoyment of a
substantial praperty right possessr~ql by other property in the same vicinity and zono, and denlecl to the propeity
In questlon;
8. That the requested varlance would he matorlally detrimFntal to t~e public welfaro or in~urious
to tho property nr improvoments In such viciniry and zone in whir,h tha property is located; and
9. That no ~ne Indicated thofr presence at sald public f~earing In oppositlon; and that no
carrespandence was r~ceived In opposltlon to subJect petitlon,
~„ALIFORNIA ENVIRQNMENTAL QUALI,TY AQT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviawai the proposal for waivers of minimum number of parking spacos and minimum
IAndscape require-~onts to permlt the addition af 1 bedroom to each of four 2-bedroarn unfts on a reatan~uiarly-
shaped parcel of lend conaist~ng of apnroximat4ly 0.1a acre, having an approximate front~ge of 73 taet on the
north side of Glen Avonue, having a maximum depth of approxlmsiely 105 ieet, being iocated approxfmately
790 feet west of the centerline of Euclid Scroet, and furthor described as 1705 ~~est Gien Avenue; and does
hareby deny the ~legAtive Declaration upon find!ng that tho declaration retlects the indepsndont jud4ement of
the lead agoncy and that It iias constdered the Negative Daclarailon together with any comments recelvec! during
the publtc re~low process and turther finding on the basis of the inftial study and any cammentn receivod thnt
there Is substantfa~ ovfdence that tho proJoct will have a significant effoct on the environmont.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Ana ~~im Ciry Planning Comrnisslon doas hereby
deny subJect Petftf~n (or Vari~nce on tho basis of the aforeme U findfngs
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was a pt at o P ning Commission meoting of
September 21, i9J2. % _ , _ `
CFiAIRMAM, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING~GOIJIMISSION
ATTF_ST: ~
~~~B~lo~ ~r
SFCR AR ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMiSSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY C~F ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Anahelm Cfty Planning Commission, du heroby certify that
tl~e foregoing resolutfon ~vas passod and adopted at a meeting of the Anahelm Ciry Planning Commlasion held
on September 21, 1992, by the fallowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BRISTOL, HENNINGEFi, MESSE, P~RAZA, TAlT, YEMEL
NOES: COMMISSIONER3: NONE
ABSEM': COMMISSIONERS: NONE
1~ACANCY: ONE SEAT
IN WITNESS WHEREQF, I have hereunto set my hand tliis .~ day of ~~1LJCJ .
1992. ~„ /.~ ~
Q/'L(i1~LLJ
SECRE'TA Y, A HEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
.2_ PC92-115