Loading...
Resolution-PC 92-121. rr.~ 1~4~V~,UTION.~v~i._f ]Lli.(a1i.L A RESOLUTIpN OF 7HE ANAFlEIM CITY PLIINNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL IJSE PERMIT N0. .'.551 EiE aRANTFD VVHEREAS, tho Anahelm City Plannin{~ Commisslon did rocolve a verHied Petltlon for Conditlonal U:te Pormk for certein real prop~rry situated In the City oi Anahelm, County of Orange, 3tate ot CallfornlA, aASCribed as: PARCEL A: PAFiCELS 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9. 12, 13, 14, 1b, 16 AND A, A.S SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 90-160, FIL:D IIJ BOOK 255, PAGES 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEi. MAPS, IN THE QFFICE OF 7HE COUNTY HECORDER OF ORANQE COUN'fY, CAUFORNIA. PARCEL B: PA~iCELS 18, 21, 22, D AND E OF l.bT UNE ADJUSTMENT PLAT NO. 2fi~t, iiECORDGA 5EF'TEMBER 30,1991 A8 INSTRUMEfJT N0. 91-532358 OF OFFICIAL I~ECOFiDS. WHERE~~, the City Planning Commisslon did hold a pub11C hearing et the Civla t',ente~ In the CitY oi Anaheim on October 5, 1952, at 1:30 p.m., notice of sald puhllc hearing having been duly gfvon es reaulred by low ~nd tn accordance with the provisions of tl~e Anaheim Municipe{ Cede, Chepter 18.03, to haar and consldar ~Idonce ior and a~afnst sab proposad conditlonal use permlt and to investigate and make iindings and recommendulions In connection therewkh; and WHEREAS, sakf Commissl~n, a(ter du,~ Inspdction, irnestigatton and st~~dy madd by Itseli anci In ita behal', and after due considaration ot al! evkionce and repoRS oNared at sak! hearing, doea 11nd and detormine the fc.!owing }acts: 1. That the proposad use is property one !or whlch a condltlonal use permft Is authorized by Anahelm Mun(cipal ~Code Sectlons 1~.03.030.010 er~1 18.74.Q20.010 to permit a chtldron's recreattonal arxi fitness'aciliry; 2. That the propose~ use Is not 1lstod In either SpecNic Plan No. 90••1 (The Festival) or tha Zuning Cade as a perm~ttsd use; 3. That SpecHic Plan No. 90•i provkles tor a teqinnal shoppl~g center contalning areaa for shoppinQ, dining, ente~tainmerK, lodping and busiRess, arxi outdoor plaza ureas servinp as informal tyatherfng pleces tor local resWents and viskors; and that the proposal, to be knawn es 'qlscovory Zone', can be consfdered an ~nteRatnmern taciliry; 4. That the propoeed use will not adversely atfoct the adjoining iand usea end the prowth und devotopment ot tho eraa in whlch R is proposed to be locatExf; 5, That the aize and shape of the sfte for the proposed use Ia adequate to t+llow tho tull devetaprnent ot the proposed use in a m.~nnar nnt detrlmer-tal to the purtkutar area nor to the peace, h3alth, sefety, erd ganerel welfare; g, That the tr~Nfc yenorated by the proposod u.go will not impose an unclue buNon upon tho stroets and high~uays designecl and improved to carry traHic In 1hu erea; CR1627MS.wp -1- PC82-121 7. The proposed use will not Imposo Any undue traHia or other condftion~ that would be detrimentei to the peace, health, safery and general weltare of the citlxons oi the Clty of Anahelm; 8. That the granting ot tha condftional uso permft under tho c~nditlons Irnposed will ~ot be dotrimental tu the peace, health, safety tand gen~~al woltare of the citizons ot the Cfry of Anahelm; and g. That no one indicated their presonce at said pubtlc hoering In opposition; and lhat no corresporxiance was received In opposltion to the sub~ect petftlon. GALIFORhIA ENVIA4~N_ME~lI~I (~AU i~' ACT F~~: ThAt tho Anahelm City Planning Cornmisslon has revl~nnred the proposal to permit a chlldren's recrentlonal and titness tacility on a~n irregufnrly-shapsd parcel of land canslsting of epprnximately 85 acres laceted at the southwest corner of Santa Ana Cenyon Road aix! Roosevelt Roed, heving epproximete frontegea of 2,170 teet on the south slde of Sar~a Ana Canyon Aond end 850 teet on tho west skie of Fioosevolt Road, and turther described as 8028 FASt Santa Ana Canyon Road; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon f(ncling that the declaretian refloc2a the independant judgement oF tha lead apency nnd that R has conaidered the NegatNo Decla-ation together with any r,ommenta recelved during the pub!ic ~eview process and further tinding on the baals of the InNial study and sny comments received that there ia no aubstantlsl evklence that the proJect wlll have e algniticsnt cMect ~n tha envlronment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEO thnt the Anahefm Cfty Plerming Commlaslon doas hereby gmnt subJect Petitlon 1or Corxfit~onal Use Permit, upon the (dlowing condftlons whtch ere hereby found to be a nec~ssary prerequisite to the proposed use ot the sub~ect proporty fn order to presprve the sa(ety and ptlneral wolfare oi t7~e CRlzena of the CKy of Anahelm: t, That subject property ahall be developed substantialiy In accordance with plans and specHicatlons submitted to the City of Anahe(m by the patitioner and wt~lch pfana are an flie with tlie Planning Departmsnt marked FachlbR Nas. 1 and 2. ~. That prbr to ~Inal b~llding and zoning fnspectlons or wRhin a period of one (1) year from the date of this resdutfon, whlchev0r occurs (I~st, Condition No. 1, above•m9nt(oned, shalt be complied with. 3. That gpproval of this applicatbn constRutes app-ovel of the proposod request only to the oxtent that R complies wkh the Anahelm 1~Auntclpal ZanUg Cocle and any other applic;a~le Cky, StAtE arxl Fer,~ernl regulatians. Approval doea not Includo any aMion or 4indtn~s as to compliance or approvel cN th~ r~quest regardinq eny other eppllcaWe ordinanca, regulatlon or roquiroment. BE IT FURTHER AESOLVED that the Anaheim Cfty Plannln~ Comrr,lssion doea hareby flnd and determine thnt ~doptlon ot thla Hesolution la expressly predicated upon nppllcant's compitence wNh sACh arQ all o~ the condft~ons hereinabove set fonh. 3houlci any such conclRion, or any part thereof, be declered irnialk~ or unenforcoaWe by the flnal ~udqment of any court~f competent Jurfufir,tlon, then this Rosalutton, and any approvals herein c~ntaln9d, sho11 be deemed,+~ul~and vofd. ~ THE FOREGOINQ RESOLUTlON was adopt~et t a PI~lnn/Iry{~~ommisalon meating of October 5, t992. %{ ~ ~ , ANAHEIM CITY PLAtvNiNG ATTEST: ~,., r ~~ / AN ~EiM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION SEf;RETARY, I ,2_ PC92-12I .~_ ~TATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORAPIGE ) ss. CITY 0~ ANAHEIM ) I, Jenei L Jensen, Secr~tary of the An~hefm Ciry Planning Commisslon, do hereby certNy thac the faregoing rosolution was passed and ado~ted at a moet(ng of the Anahelm Ciry Plttnning C;ommisston hold on October 5, 1932, by the following vote of the members tharoof; AYES: COMNAISSIONERS: BRISTOL, HENNINdER, M~SSE, PERP"'.~-, ZEMEL NOEB: COMMISSIONERS: iVOWE ABSENT: COMMISSIQNERS: TAIT VACANCY: ONE SFJ~T IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ! have hereunto s~t my hend thls '',~~ ~ day of ~~,J. ; /,,J ~ 1~9?.. ~ ~''/.,~ ~, f ' ~ .,:, , % S~CRETAfiY, ANAH~I CITY PIANNING COMMISSION ~ ! -3• P(:92-121