Loading...
Resolution-PC 92-136~~4lI N ~ . p~z-,3s A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANN!NG COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOFi CONDITIONAL US~ PERMlT N0. 3564 BE GRANTE~ WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Comml3sion did receive a verified Petitlon for Conditirn~al Use P~rmft tor certain real proporty situated in the Clry of Anaheim, County ol Orange, 8tate o( Cali!omia, doscriboJ as: PAHCEL t: LOT 17 OF TRAUT N0. 1620. IN TNE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDE~ IN BOOK 51, PA.raES 31 AND 32, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THc COUNTY RECORDER OF SAIQ COUNTY. PAFiGEI 2: LOT 18 OF ?RACT Np. 182G, IN THE CITY OF AfVAHEIM, COUNTY OF ~3RANGE, S~ATE OF CA:.IFORNIA, I~S PER N~AP r~CORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGES 31 AND 32, OF MISCELLANEOUS 1IIAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE CUUNTY RECORDER OF SAIO CI~UPlTY. FARCEL 3: LUT 59 OF THACT N0. 1820, IN THE CI?Y OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, S?ATE OF ~ALIFGRNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDEn IN E300K 51, PAGFS 31 AND 32, OF MISCELIANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFF~CE OF THE COU~ITY RECOFiDER OF SAID GOUNTY. WHEREAS, the Chy Planntr.p Commissfon did hold a public hearing et the Civic Cen~er ~r. the ~ily ot Anoheim r,~ Nwembor 16, 1992, at 1:30 p.m., naice ot saki public hearb~g havinQ been duly glvere as re~ulrad by Iaw arx! in accordance wilh the provlslons of t~~e Anahefin Munic.~al Code, Chapter t8.03, tc- hear and consklor evidence tar and aqainst a3kl p-oposed conditional use permit and to irn~estig~ te arxf make tindings arrf reCOmmendations in cdnnoction therewith; and V1RiEAFA3. sald Commiasion, a~IQr due inspw.Kbn. invnsihjatfor, and study made by Kselt arrt in its t~:halt, Tnd after due conaideration of ali evklence arxJ repo~ts dFergd at sbkl hearing, does find and delerminu the fallawin~ facta: t. Tha! the piopo~ed use fa proaer~~~ orte tor which a conditional uao permft is Aulhorited by Aru~he~m iNunic~ocd Code Sectfcn 18.a4 050.1f)5 In permit a 2.688 r. corrvt~ience rt~arket with waiver c.~ ~rw ~a~a~v~~9: ~ecliQn4 1~~~ " ~~~RaCea_1 ~~'r~; ~7_S~ ~~+`e~S~ ~;gtin9) ,t~.Q~4 ~f~4~.~a4 ?. That 1hQ parkhq va~fancE will not cause an increase In 1raHic corqcsllon in the immecllato vicir.ity nar adversciy eMQCt ~lrry adjoininp larx! usES. arM lhat an Arlditfonal 8 sr "M-sitacl parking apAC.es are avadabte on•~to; 3. Tf-at Ih~a g~rning al th~ pci~tng varka~ wxl~r she corxfitiona fmposecl vrill nol be detrimantal to tho p~ace haa~th, salety or ~rseral wrNaro d che citizens c~! tho City M Anat~e:m; 4. That the propo~.a1 uv± is propnAy onn (rst which a conc:itbnal uso! ~mri Is aWherlicKl ay tt-e Zcx~ir-g Code: CR t r3B2M3.wp •1 • FC'02•t ~8 5. 7hat tho prcpo~ed use will not advers~~y aHect tho ad~olninQ land uses ond the flrowlh and development of tl~e area In whfch it is proposec~ to be located ba..ause subjeGt use permft Is conditioned upon Ilrnited hours of operation and a pruhwitlon on any alcoholic bevorage salos tor eltl~er on• or oH•premisos coi ~sumptlon; 6. That the sizo arxi shape of ihe s(te far the proposcd use Is adoquate to a.llow the (ull developmAnt of the oroposed use in a monnor not dotrimentnl to the psRicuter araa nor to tha peaco, health, sa(ery, and gsneral welfa~~e; 7. 7hat tha traNlc generated by the proposeci uso will not Im{~oso en unduo ourden on the streets and highways d3signecS and fmprovotf to carry traHic in tlie area; 8. 1'hat the grant(ng ot ttie conditiona! use permft undQr the conditiuns imposed wili not be detrtmental to the pEace, hoalth, safety and yenoral wel(are oi the citizens ot the Cfty of Ar~ helm; and 5. That no one Indicated thetr prosence at sakf pubiic hep~!~~g In oppositioir and that no correspondence was receNed in opposition to the sub~ect petftion. rA~ IFORNIA ENVIRONMEN.LA.~9SLuN.BS~. FL~l..R~C~~ That the Anoheim Git,r Planning Commission has revievred the proposal to permit a 2,688 aquare foot corneniencca market with weiver ol minimum number of parking spaces on a rectangulatly shaped parcel of land conaist(ng ot approxlmt~tely O.E'i4 acre, having an approximate (rontage ot t88 (eet on ihe north side ot Uncdn Avenue, having a maximum dopth of spproximately 147 teet, beinQ located approxim~tely 951eei ~uest of ihe centertine ot Grancf Avenue and IurthAr desc~ibed as 3111 West I.Incc~ln Avonue; arxi does hereby approve the Ne~a1Ne Oeclnration upon Mding that tho declaratton rellects the independ~rK ~ud9Qmont ol the IRad agoncy end thet k has conaldored the Negatlvo Declar~tion together with any comments receivad durfng the put~ic roviow process ar~1 fu~hor flnding on the t~aais ol tho inrifal study aixi any comments raceivec! that thero is no substantlal evWenco lhat tha prnject wAI have a significant eHect on the environment. NpW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOWEp that the Anahelm Ciry Planning Commisalor, does hereby grant subJect Petition for Condritonal Uso Permft, upon the loltaw•ing corxJitlons whfch are heruby found to be a necessary prerequisite to lhe propc~sed use ot the sub~ect property in order to presen+e Ihe sal~ty and general wWlare of Ihe Citizens of i~e City of Anaheim: t. That tho business h~urs of oporation shatl be limital ta 9:00 a.m. to 9 p.m. daily. 2. tl~3t ther~ shal! be no sAies ot alcohdic bevernges tor oli• or on•promisss cansumption. 3. That a Ptan SheM for sdid wastc stor~ga and cdlection, and a Man lor rn_cy~ling sha~l -~e submilted to tho OepnHment ot Ma~tenance lor revfew and approval. 4. that subiect propurty sha~~ be deveiopecl subat~mfatly in accordance with plans ~nd s~cH~cations autxnitted tb the C!ty of Anahcsim a/ the potitioner arxf which pians ere or~ lae wfth thu Ptanning pepahme~it mnrked ~xhibk Nos. t and 2. 5. 'fhat prior to Iscua~ca ot a buadin~ permit a wi!hin a pe~fod ~t onu (t) year from Iho dote ot this resolutlon, wh:chever occura I(rst. Cor~di-ian Nos. 3 and A, nbovc-mPntiwi2d. ahall b~a ComMiad wilh. ~xtc?nsiOfl9 (Of (uAfMr 1!rtf9 lo Com(11Me S7k) COtldhfon8 rtlay b0 Qranttld (n acCrltt1a11CA wilh $t,-Ct~0r1 18.03.~90 d lhe Artahoim ~lunkipaf Code. 8. That apprwal of this apdicatfon cen~thules apprwal ot t1w proposecl rcx;:~gu cxdy to tho ex!ent that n cnmplies with the Ar~ah~im Munictpai 'soninb Cac1e and ~ny dhor bpplicat~e City, Stbte and f~ederal regulatana. A~xavnl does nW Mdvdu any actfon a linclings a t to cort-~Ilanco ar Appta,+al 01 the ~.+qu~at raqerclinq any dh~! ap~+I;caWe oMinance. regulaikm a requir~ment. .a. Nc<rn-~ag BE IT F11A1'NER RESOLVED that tho Anahofm City Plnnning Commission does I~ereby (!nd ard determine that nrloptlon of this Resolutlon I~ exprossly predlcated upon Appllcnnt's compllAnco with each and .,II ol the condltions hereinabo~e set torth. Should nny bu condit!on, or any part thoroot, be declereci Invalid or unentorceabfo by lhe (inai ~udgmont oi ony urS, oi competqnt jurisdic4~on, then thts Resolution, and an~ approwals heroin contatned, shall be deo ed y~ull and votd~ THE FOFiEG01NG FiESOLUTION was ad ad th lan g Commisslan meoting of Novgmbor 16, t992. /` ,, d ~ ti.. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CI7Y PLANNIN ' OMMISSION ATTES7: _ ,l ~ ~f,~ .•,,,~ _,s,,..~i ~~~~~ STA7F.. ~JF CALIFORNIA ) COU! ~~Y A~ ORANGE ) ss, CIT" OF AfJAHEIAA ) ~ SE ETARY, ANhH~IM 41TY PLANNING CGi1AMISSION ;~ _ -%' I, .lanet L Jensen, Secretary of the Anaheim Cfty Planninp Commisston, do herohy cartHy that the foregoing resdutlon was possed and adopted at a meetirig of tho Anahefm City Planning Comrnission held on Novomber iti, 1992, by tho Ioliowing v~te of the mnmbera thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BRISTOI, HENNINGER, MESSt, PeRII~.A, T/11T, ZGMEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOyE ~ ABSENT: COMMISSION~RS: NONE VACANCY: ONE SEAT ; ~~ IN WIT~~ES3 WIIEREQF, I havo hereunto set my hancl this c, ;,~ ~,. day of .G..:'G;ea/~"~ 194T2. , / ~, '~' " ~_... , ' ' • , ~i S CRETARY, ANAHEIM'CITY pLANNIV(3 COMPWISSIUN ~ ; / ~3- PC92•1a6