Resolution-PC 92-139M~'^
RESOLUTION f~¢L°C92-139
A RESOLUTION OF TI•IE ANANEIPA CITY PLANNIyG COMil01SSI0N
7HA1' PEl'ITIAN FOR VARIANCE tJO. 4188 EE GHAPJ7E~, IN PART
WHEREA5, the Anaheim City Planning Commissian dld receive a verltied Pc~titlon for
Varlance for certain real property situated In the City of Anaheim, County ot Oranpe, State of CailFornia
doscribed as:
B~GIN~!ING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER LINE OF TWE SANTA ANA CANYnN
ROAD (NOW STATE HIGFiWAY), A9.13 FEET NORTH 44 DEG. UU' 30" ~AST FHOM
'~HE ~ND OF A CURVE ON SAID CENT~R LINE, SAID CURVE BEING
APPROXIMATELY 13A8,00 FEET SOUTH 44 D~G. 00' 30' WEST FFlQM 7HE
lNTERuECTiON OF SAID CEN7ER I.INE, BY NORTN LINE OF TOWNSHIP 4
SnU7H, RANGE y WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, RUNfVING
FPOM SAID POINT OF BEGINNIfVG, SOUTH 42 DEG. 59' 40" EAST 453.34 FEET;
7HENCE NOR7H 47 OEGREES 08' 2Q" EAST 28~.62 FEE7'; THENCE NORTH 42
DEG. 59' 40" WEST 468.fi8 FEFT TO A POINT IN THE CEfJTER LlNE OF SANTA
ANA CANYON ROAD; THENCE SOUThI 44 DEG. ~0' 30" WE~T 28t.00 FE~T
ALaNG SAID CENTER LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND QESCRIBED AS
FOLLO~/S:
BEGINNING A7 THE MOST NORTHERLY CORMER OF TN.AT CERTAIN REAL
PROPEFl r1f DEBCFiIBEd IN D~ED 70 LOUIS BRn~Y, DATED JUPJE 26,1947, ANG
RECO~tQEU IN THE OFFICE OF THE CQUN'fY RFCORD~R OF SAIL~ ORANGE
COUNN, WHICH CORNEA IS DISTAN7 AL4NG THE CENTER LINE OF SANTA
ANA CANYON RO/ID, AS PER OEED T~ SAID COUNTY RECORDEO IN BUOK
171, PAGE 144 OF OFPICIAL RECQFiOS iN THE A~FICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER 9F SAID ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH 44 DE~REES 07' 42" EAST
33U.13 FEET FROM A B01_1' ON SAIO CEN7ER LINE, MARKING THE SOUTHWFS i
TERMINUS OFTHAT CERTAIN COURS~ DESCRIBED IN SAlD IASY MENTIOPJEU
DEED AS HAVING A BEARIPICi ~fOR7H 43 DEGRE~S 51' 05" EAST, AND A
LENGTH OF 1488.q2 F~ET; THEhCE ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, SOUTH A4
U~GREES 07' 42" WEST 223.97 FEET; 'fHENCE NORTH E30 DEGRE~5 3~' Q2"
EAST 93.87 FEET; "i HENCE NORTHEASTERLY AND iANGENT TO TWE lA5T
DESCFlIBEO COURSC, ALONG A CURVE Ct~NCAVE NOR i HWESTERLY, HAVING
A RADIUS OF 2110 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 135.'19 FEET ~0 A POINT IN
THE NORTHEASTERLY UNE OF SAID PROPER'fY OF LOU~S BRODY, DISTRNT
THEREON SOUTH 42 DEGRECS 52' 28" EAST 60.57 FEET FqOM SAID POIN7 OF
BEGINNING; THENCE NpRTH 42 DEG. 52' 2H' WE.°? 60,57 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINtvING, WHICN HAS B~F_M GRANTED TU THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BY DFED RECORDEl~ FEBfiUAFlY 25, 1948 IN C':~C3K 1621, PAGE 447 OF
OFFICIAL RECOROS fN THE OFFICE QF TFiE COUNTY RECOf1DEFi ~F SAID
ORANGE COUN7Y.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEFtEFRO~i, TI~AT PORTION D~SCRIBED AS PARCEL NO.
2.Ot IN DEED T~ THE ORANGE COUNTY HARBORS, BEACHE.~, AIJD PARKS
DISTP.ICT, RECORDEO MAY 4, 1977 IN BOOK S21Tl, PAGE 15F32 OF OFFICIAL
REGOFiDS OF ~AID ORANGE CQUNTY.
CR 1579MS.wp .1. PC92-139
aWM.,
WHERFJ~S, the Ciry Planning Commission did hold a publlc hearing at the Civlc Cent9r in tho City
of Anahelm on Auaust 10, 1992, at 1:30 p.m., notico of sald publ(c hearinp having been duly given ss requirod
by lav~ snd In accordance with tho provislone a! the Anahaim Municipal Code, ~hapter 18.03, to hear and
conskJer evidonce for end a~aln34 seid proposod varianco and to Investlgate and mako findin~s and
recnmmendations In connection therewith; and that said public hearing was continued to ihe October 5,
Novembar 2 and December 2, 1~J~J2 Planning Commissian meet(ngs; and
WHEREAS, st~k1 Commission, after due ~nspection, InvFStlgatinn and study mado by itself anc! In
Its behalf, and e!tor due conslderatlon of all avidenoo and reports oHered at said hoar(ng, does tind and
determina thc~ fdlcwing facts:
1. That tho ~Setltloner proposes waNers of tha following to construct two ireestanding shopping
center identlflcatlon aigns:
(a) Soctions 18 0~.09y,010 - Permitted tvoe oLShooolna cent_er iderit(ficatlon slan.
g~d tg•8~1,062•040 (One sh qgn_ac~ntor iduntffication sia mQU.U~.~~
,~.,30•inch hiah de~ot~tN~.~T19S~LW~1~. Permitted in the
Scenic CaRidor; `-~ -4LLah~.l.I:f4S~L1SlS
manument sians proposedj
(b) Sc~ctions t.f~05•091.014 . M~xim~m slan area.
end 1,g,~4.062t040 (~gS~,ft, slan permitted; ;~a•it, sIQ.R Proposed)
(c) ~ectlone 19.U5.oA,'i.023 - .P~rm~ttod ~ocation of freest.~ndina sians.
~i $,.~4,.082,0~10
2. That the above-msntloned wafver (A} Is hereby apprcvod, in parc, permittt~~g ~~:aximum 4 foot
hlgh signs; And 4hat waNer (B) is approved, In part, allowfng a maximum area of 44 squarA teet per sign on
th~ bASls that subject property has lung streot front~ges which w~rrants twa signs, end wlilch circumstance
devrwas tt d~u ~perty ol~prlvile~os enjo ed by~other Fropertles In he dentic~ai zolno ar d classif catio9 n~ho
vicfn'ity.
3. That the above•mentlonRd waiver (C) is herehy denied on the basis that it Is not epplicabla
to sipns in the Sconic Corr(dor a-ul was inadvertently advertlsed.
4. That the signs shail be mounted on solid basos.
5. 7hat the colored ploxiglass shall be more consistent wtth the earth tones utilfzed withfn this
center and others in thd vicinity.
6. That the a~gns ahal~ consfst of oRhor an opaque sign surface with bnck IK letteriny consistent
witli thA subduacf slgn fllumfnation of ather centers within the Scenic Cnrcidor Overlay Zone or the signs shall
be Indirectly Iighted.
7. Tt-at there are exceptlar~al or extrpordinary circumstances or conditions applicablo to the
property Irnolvecl or to ihe Intendod uco of the praporty that do not apply genorally to tho propo-ty ~r cla~s
o( u3e fn the same vlclnfry arxi zone.
8. That the requested variance fs necessary tor tho preservation and enjoymont of a subst~ntial
proporty right poss~ssed by oth:-~ property in the same vicinity eruJ zone, And d~nied to the pro~erty in
quostfon.
9. Tt~at the req~uef p o 0 e~tgen such~vic ~ilry and zona~in h ch the propertyes loclated Nare
or in~urious to the properry
,2. PC92-139
10. That no one Indicated thelr prosenco at said publlc hearirig in opposi!lon; and that no
corro3pondence was roceived in opposition to subJect potition.
CALIFORNIA ENJV,Rt~NMENTAL ~UALITY ACT FlNDING: The Planning L~iractnr or hls authorized
represontativo has deterrnined that the proposeci proJect falls within the definition of Categoricel Exoniptlons,
Class t 1, as defined In the StAte EIR Gutdellnes flnd i;i, therefore, categorically exempt irom the requiremont to
prepare an EIR.
NOW, 7HEI~EFORE, BE 17 RESOWED ttiat tho Anaheim City Planning Commission does horeby
grant subisct Petftion for \~arianco, upon the folluwinp conditions wh(ch are h~reby found to be a necossary
prerequlsite to the prapased ase of the subJect property In order to preservo tho sa(ery and general welfare of
the Cft(zans nf tha City ~t Anaheim:
1. That prior to Issunnco of a buliding permit or withln ~ period of one (1) year from the dHte of this resolutlon,
whfchever occurs t(rst, sign plans shall bo submittecl to the Buflding D(vlslon sf~owing conformance with
En~inooring Stendard Plan No. 137 portafning to slght distance vlsibilfty. Extonsions for further time t~
cumpleto this condition may bo granted in accordenca witl~ Soction 18,n3.090 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code.
2. That prior to final building ancl zoninp inspections, subject property shell be developod substantiafly fn
accardanco wlih pl~ns and specifications submitted to the City of Anahoim by the potltinner end which
plans aro on file wfth the Plannin~ Department marked Exhibit No. 1 and Revislon No. 1 af E:chibit No. 2;
provid~d, however, that:
(a) Both slgns shall be mounced on sol(d bases;
(b) 1'tie maximum sign helghts shall be (our (4) foot;
(cj Thd msiximum area por sign shall be forty tiour (44) square feot;
(d) The color of the ple:ciglass shall be earthon-toned aonststent witli nnd co-ordinAted with the c~lors
ot ihe bullding materials oi this shopping center; and
(e) The sl{~n illumination shall bo suhdued and shall consist of either: indiroot Ilghting or the lettering
on the signs may be back lit and the background suKaces shall be opaque.
3. That approval of thls appllcatfon constltutes approval of ti.^ proposod request oniy to the extant that it
complfes with the Anaheim AMunicipal Zonfng Code and a~iy other anplicable City, State end Fedoral
regulations. Approval does not include a~iy actfon or Nndings as to compl(ance or epprovai of the roquost
regardfng any other applicablo ord(nance, regulat(An or requiremant.
BE 17 FURTHER RESOWED thac the Anati~fm Ciry Planning Commission does hereby ffnd and
determine that adoptiun of this Resalutton fs expressly predicated upun applicanYs compllance wlth each and
all oi the conditions hereinabnve s~t forth. Shauld any such conditio , ur any part thero~f, ba decfAred InvallJ
~r uneniorcoeble by the iinAl judgment af any caun o( compete urfsdictfon, then this Resolution, and any
approvals herein cantained, shall be deemeci null and void. ~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUT'ION was ad ted -t thq~Pl~qing CommissiQn meot(np of
December 2, 1992. /~ ~~ i,/jl,~L,,,,.,,.,
A1T~ST:
~ ~ • ~~ ~-': ~ l'- ' -', ' ^
~~ CRETARY, A~AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
I ~
, ANAHEIM CIIY PLAhNING
.3- ~ ~92•139
~••
S7ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNT'Y OF ORANGE ) sa,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Janet L. Jensen, Searotary of the An~heim Cky Planning Commissfon, do hereby certif.y that
tho foregoln~ resolutlon was passecf and adopted at a mooting of the Anahelm City Planning Commisslon heid
on December ?., 1992, by the following vote of the membors therEjof:
AYES: COMMISSIGNERS: BRIS'~ OL, HENNINGER, MESSE, PERAZA, TAIT, ZEMEL
NOES: COMMISSIOr1ENS: NONE
ABSENT: C~Jt~1MISSIONERS: NONE
b'ACANCY: ONE SEA7
IN WiTNESS'vVhiEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~~day of .~ f.~~~,~rJ.992•
i i , ...~ ~ ~ ~7. ..J_
_-.~:~~ .~~:~.„~~,e,.~~~
S@CHE7ARY, A jANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~_.~% `
~. Pcs2-~as