Resolution-PC 92-143r~
pFSrn_lrTION NA. PC92-143
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMb118S{ON
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL U5E PERM{7 N0. 3560 BE GRANTED
WHEREA~, the Anahelm City Plann!ng Commisslon did recoivR a verlfied Petitlon for
Conditlonal Use Permit for certain real property situated in the Ciry of Anaheim, Counry of Orange, State of
CaliFornia, described as:
PARCEL 3 AS SHOW~i ON A MAP IN BOOK 45 PA~E 28 Or PAtiCEL MAPS.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisslon did hold a public hoAring at the Civic Conter in
the Cfty of Anahelm on December 2, 1992, at 1:30 p.m., notfce of safd public hearing having been duly gfven
as required by faw and In aacordance with the provisluns of the Anaheim Munfcipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and agalnst sald proposed conditlonal use pormlt end to invest~gate and
make tindings and recommendations in connectfon therewith; and
WHEREAS, sald Commission, after d~ie inspectlon, investigatlon and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and aftor due consfderation of all ev;dence and raparts offered at said hearinp, daes find
and determine the following fPCts:
1, That the proposed use Is properly one tor which a conditfonal use permit !s authorized by
Anahelm Municipal Code Section 18.84.052.050 to permft a satellite dish antenna and wafver af the fallowing
ta construct a 171 sq.ft. toot additlan to a detached accedsory structuro:
,~g~tion '8.22.QB3.0~0 - in i ,(de vard g~back.
(15 feet required;
5 fe6t tr~m east property 11ne proposed)
2, That thero are special circumstancea applicablo to the proporty Euch as sizo, shapo,
topography, locatlon or surroundin~s, which do nat apply t~ other identically zo~~eci proparties In the vicinlty.
3. That strfct appllcatlon oi the Zoning Code deprives the praperty of prfvile~os enJoyed by other
propertie~ under ldentical zon(ng clessltication In the vicinity.
4. That ground•mounted sutellite dish antennas are authorized by th9 approve{ af a conditional
uso permh.
5. That the ground•mounted setellite dish wfll be screened from the vlew of adiacent propartles
by existing topc~~raphy, e tennis court tence and ma4ure landscapinfl,
6. That the Froposed uso wlil not adversely aHect the adjolning land uses and tho ~rowth and
developmont of t~e area in whfch it (s proposed to be locateu.
7. That the size anci shape of the site for the proposed ~se is adequate to allow the full
developmont o( the proposed use in a manner n~t detrimentel to the particular area nor to the peace,
health, safoty, ar-d flenArai wel(are.
8. That tho traHic generated by the proposed use will not fmpose an undue burden upon the
streets snd highways dosi~ned ond Improved to ~arry ihe trflHic in the area.
9. That the granting oi the conditi~nal use pennit under the conditions imposed wfll not be
detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general weltare oi the citfzens of the City of Anahefm.
CRt 68~th9S.wp -1- pC92•t 43
10. That one Interoated person india~tecl his presonce at satd publ{c hearin~; and that one letter
was rsceived rsgarding subJect petition.
C~,ALIFQRNIA E~,I,yI.RONR~ENTAL, ~U~LITY AC7 FINQIl1Sa~ The Planning Qirector or his euthorized
re~resantatlve has determined that 4he proposod praject falls withln the definition of Cfategorlcal Exemptlons.
Class 3, as dofinod in the State EIR Guldelines and Is, ~nerefore, categorically exompt from the requlrement
to preparo an EiR.
NOW, THEREFOI~E, BE IT RESOWFD that the Anaheim Clty Planning Cammissian does hereby
grant subJoct Petftion for Conditional Uso Permlt, upc+n the f~llowing conditlons which ara heroby found to
bo a necessary prerAquisite to the propased use o( the subJect property In order to preseNe tho safety and
genArai welfaro or the Citizens of the Ciry of Anahoim:
1. That subJect properry ahall be developod substantially in accordanae with plans and speciilcatlons
submittAd to the City of Anahoim by the pc~4ltioner and whlch plans aro nn flle with tho Pl~nninp
Department marked Exhibft Noa.1 and 2.
2. That prior to final bulid(ng and zoning inspectlons or withln a perlod of one (1) year from tl~e date of
tliis rosolution, whichever occurs first, Condition N~. 1, above•mentioned, shall be aomplled with.
3. That approval af this applicatfon c~nstitutes approval oF thd propos~d requost only to the extant that
it complie~ with the Anahelm Municipal Zoning Code and any uther appl(cable City, State and Federal
reflulations. Approvt~l does not Includo any action or iindings as to complianco or approval of the
reyuest regarding any other ttpplicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED ihat the Anahelm Gity Planni g Commisslon doos `~ereby flnd and
determine that adoption of this Resolutlon Is ~xprossly predicated on applicant's cumpllance with ear,h
and all oF the cunditions hereinabove set iorth. Should any such nditfon, or any pa~t thereuf, be declared
invalld or unentorceablo by tha (inal Judgment of any court ot rr otent Jurisd tlon, then this Rosolutfon,
and any approvals harein oontalned, shall be deemed null a v d.
TI-IE FO(~EGOING RE30LUTION was ad t at t Pla ny CommissiQn meetinc~ of
December 2, 1fl92. ~
CHAIRMAN. ANAHEI CITY PLANNI COM~IIISSlON
ATTEST:
~~~: ~i :' _"'' '~ ~.i ~ ,. , L' l.~ ~ 9 r... ~
,l~ ~CRETARY, /1NAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ STATE QF CAL.IFQRNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAFiEIM )
I, Janet L Jensan, Sacratary of tFie Anaheim City Planning Commisslon, da hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was pasaed And adopted at a meeting of the Anahefm City f'Iannfng
Gommission held on December 2, 1992, hy the fol~awing vote ot tho members thereof:
AYES: COMNfiSSIONERS: BRISTOI.,
NOES: C041MIS310NERS: NONE
ABSENY: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
VACANCY: ONE SEAT
HENNINGER, ~AE3SE, P~R/~ZA, TAIT, ZEMEL
IN WITNESS WH~REUF, I havo hereunto set my hand thi3 ~~ day of
~;r.*,;,•~ ~~. , 1992, ' - "
7,. .,, ~, ., :a ;l ~ ~ •. ~i_, : ~._. :
~ ,',~` •" ~,
, SbCRETARY, ANAHE~CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
.~_ PC92-143