Resolution-PC 92-18,-•-
RESOI,UTION NO. PC92-10
A RE50LUTION OF TFiE ANAHEIM CITY PLANPiIIJG COMMISSION
4'HAT FETITION POR CONDITIUNAL USE PERMIT NO. 3~351 BE DENIED
WHER~AS, the Anaheim City Planning Cununieeion did recelve u
verified Potition for Cond.itional Uae Permit for certain real property
eituated in the Cicy of Anaheim, County of Orangc~, State of California,
describec; as:
A PORTION QF LO'P THIRTY-TWU (37.) OF ANAH~:IM EXTENSION~
A5 SHOWN ON A b1AP QF SURVE:Y MADE BY WILL'IAM HAMEL AND
FIL~D FOR RECOAD IN THE OFFICE Or TFiE COUN:Y RCCORDE~t
OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFpRNIA, MORE PARTTCULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNIIQG AT THE INTERSEC'tION OF THE EAST LINE OF
WALNUT STRFF.T WZTii THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SANTA ANA
STREET AS SAID STRF:ET5 ARE SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE
NOATHEASTERLY 83.01 F'EET ALONG Tt1E NORTHERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT 32 TO THE ;NT6RSECTION WITH THE SOUTFIWESTF.RLY
LINE OF MANCHESTCR AOULF.VARD FORldERLY THE 100-FOOT
~:IGHT OF WAY OF THE SOUTHERIi PACTFIC RAILWAY; THEt1CE
SOUTHE:ASTERI,Y ALONG 3AID 80ULEVARD 432.44 FEET TO A
POINT; THENC£ SOUTHWESTER'LY 376.16 FEET ON A LINE
PARALLEL WITH THE NOR'PtiERLY LINE O~ LOT 31. TO A POINT
SN THE WEST LINE OF SAID LO'P WFiICH I5 404.99 FEET
SOUTh OF TFIE POIClT OF BEGIt!l12NG; TtiENCE NORTFi ALONG
TFIE WEST LIIJE OF SAID LOT 32 TO THE POINT OF
DEGIP7NING.
E}(CEPTINC THERFFROM. THE 4iEST 6.25 FE6T A5 CONVEYED TO
THE CITY OC A1IAFIEIDI FOP. THE PURPOSE OF WIDENING THF.
FAST Ot7E-HALF' (1/2) OF Wr1LNUT STREET 6Y UF.ED RECORDED
cF,EItUARY 1ST, 1910 TN BOOK 177, PACSE 35 OF DGE:DS.
ALSO EXCCPT THAT PORTIOt~ TNEkEOF LYItIG ttORTNERLY OF A
LIfIE PARA.f.LEI. WITH AtlD UISTANT 3d.75 FEE'f SOUTt~ERLY
FRO:•l TtiE MOf1UMEtiT~D CEN'fER LINE ~iF WBST SAt7i'A At7A
STREET CQfJVEY£D 'f0 TNE CITY OF Ai~AHBIM, A MUt~ICIPAL
COAPOPI1TIOt1, FOR THF. WIC~tiiliG OF WES'P SAt:TA ANA
S'fREET, DY UEtiD RECOADED RPRI!. 14, 1939, BOOK 988,
p~CE d83 OF OFFICIAL RECOR~S.
e`.1
~
~~
r
Wt1EREAS, the City Planniny Commieaion diA h•~ld a pub)ic hearsng
nt thQ Civtc Canter in tho City pf Anaheim on Octobor 'l, 1991 at 1s30 ~.m.,
notice of anid ~ublic he~rin, iiaving been duly given aA requirRd by lnw nnd in
acc~+rdancQ with ehe proviolone cf the Anahein Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
r.o hoar and conei~tc~r oviannca~ for and ~qainnt said proposed conditional ~~se
;,ermit a~d to invaetiy:.itu nnA m3ke ftndtnyn and r~comsuendations ln co~noction
therc;~ritt~; an:l that eaid public hcaring wan continued to thc~ Novemyar 18,
1491, .lanuary 17 ~n:f fic~br~ary 2z, 1952 Planning Commienlan meotings; and
cpia2eMs
-i-
PC92-1C
WHEREAS, said Commienion, aftor due inepoction, i.nvootigation
anr] atudy made by itsalf and in its bohalf, and aftor dua corieider~l•ion of all
avi~ence and reports offered at aaid hearing, dues find and deter.mine th~
follow.ing factas
1. That the propo~ed uee ie pr~porly one for which a
conditional use permit ie autY~o~ized by Anaheim Municipal Co3e Soctions
1II.03.030.010, 18.61.050.070, 18.61.050.145, 18.61.050.375 and :18.61.05U.5'16
to retain an auto ropair, towing and dismAntllnq faci.lity {including the
sturaqe and retail sale of uaed auto parte) and a tampuxary office tra~lRr.
with waiver of the following:
(Ay SECTIONS 18.06.030 - Reaulred imorovemont of~arkina and o~~door
and~8;G3.066.050 otorA~e aroa.
(F!~11 aavement required=
comnacted cruehed r.ack trs atm~t pro~osad)
(B) S c:~TIODiS 19.6~63.011 - Minimum otruc*.ural er.>tbac a.
ond 18.61.063,020 ;Re~uired: 50 fRet from artorial hiyhways, and
16 to 24 feet from single-family residential
zoning;
Frapoeed: 0 to 5 SPet from Manchegt•er Avenue
to bu.ilding~, canopy and L•raeh enclosure,
0 to 3£ee~ from Walnut 5traet to buildinge snd
trt~elt enclosure, and
ee from south property l~ne to p.ropoeed
building and csnopy)
(C) ~CTION 18.61.063.04G - keauired :mvroveme~t of c~etbac ~r~e.
(Landecaaing of minimum eetback ar~an r.eguiredj
non@ propoeed)
2. That auff icient environmontsl do:un~antation wao not 9ubmitteQ
to properly evaluate Cali fornla Er~vironrt~ontal Quality Act findlnqa and no
aclditional t~etimany was receivcsd during the public hearinq to ~rovide
otherwiae;
3. Ttiat waLver.e (A), (~) and (C) are hereby denied because the
petLtioner did not identity nny harashipsj
4. ^_'hat there are no special cir.r.vmstancts applicable to the
proporty nuch aa :~:ze, ehapu, toooyraphy, location or. ourroundinge, which do
not n~pl}~ to other identically zoned properl•iea in the vicinityj
5. That eCrfct appllcation af. the Zoning Code doog not deprlvs
the property of privilages enjoyed by othex prnportioe under identLc31 zonit:y
clog~tfication in tho vicinityp
6. Tbe propoeed u:aeo are pronar7.y onu for which a conditio..al
una pormit le authori~ed by Che Zaning Code, and thae certain us@n uro not
=Luted therein ae boinq a pcer.miC*.c~cf ueof
-2- PC92-la
7. The proposed usa will adversely affect the adjoininy land
uaes and thQ growth and development of the area in which it ie propoeacl to be
locatedj
8. Thal: the sizo :ind nhape of the aite for the proposed uAo
(auto dtemantlin9 arni sal~s of ut~c~d auto parte plus expaneion oE the exieting
auto repair and iinpcund facility) is not adequate to allow the full devalopmont
of. the pr~poeed uae in a manner not dotrimental to the particular area nor. to
L•he peace, health, safety, arid yeneral welfare of the citizens of thg City oE
Anaheim;
9. 'rhat the increase3 tra£fLc: generated by the propooed
intenaification of use will impose an ~~~due burden upon the etreete and
highwaye deyigneci and improved to cnrry the trafEic in the arear and
10. That previoue ?lanning Comminsion apNrovale pertaining to
subject property wer~ made with the underetanding that auto diamantling would
nnt occur on aubjQCt pruperty; and
11. That the granting of the conditional ues pe ,it would be
detrimental to the peace, health, P3fBty and garieral welfare of chc~ citiz~n~ of
the City of Anaheim becauoe of thQ proxi.mity to a eingle-family residsntial
neiahborhood.
12. That no one indl.cated their prosence at eaid public hoaring in
opposition; and that no correapondence wa~ receivod in opposition to the
subSect petition.
r,AI.IFORf1IA ENVZgONMENTAL~_UA~TY ,ACT FI[~DT~ICy: That the Anahelm City
Pla:~ninq Commiouion hao zeviewed the pr.op~eal to retai.n an auto repair, towing
and didmantling facility (including the storago and ret.:il salc~ of uaed auto
parts) and a L•emporary office Crailer with waivers of required improvement of
parking and outdoor etorage ar~a, minimum atructural eotbnck and reguired
improvement of eotback azeas on an irrQgularly-ahaped parceL of land conststing
of e~pr.oximately 2.1 ucres located at tlio ao~tho:est corneL of Mancheater Avenue
and Santn Ana Strc+etf having appro;cimat.e frontages of 420 feet on the west sid~
of Manchester F+venue, 90 fpet on the sauth eide of Snnt~ Ana Street and 390
±eot on the east sido nf 4valnut Street and furelie~ referred to se 521-521 South
Martch~nter AvenuQ and 5U0-520 South Walnur. SL•reet; a~~d doee hereby deny a
mit!gatad Negative Der,lar.ation ~n the basir~ that r.ho Planning CommieAion hee
conuiderod the propoa~l with the mitigated Ney~tive Declaration and tlonitoring
Proqram, togoCher with any r.omm~nto received clurinq tt!e pablic revi~w proceae
and lurther ftn~ing, on ttie baaie of the Inttial Study, that thoro is
aubstanCial evi~iencv that tho project wi21 hav~ a~ignificant Rffect on the
ssnvironment.
NOW, THEREFORE, 6E TT RESOLVED thnt the Anahc~im Clty Planning
.^_o:nmiasion doefl hereby deny subject Petition for Conrlitional Uee Pormit, on the
beais af th3 aforementioned finding~s.
-3_ ?C92-1S
~
7HE FURGGOING RESOLUTiON wae adopted at tho Planning Commis~ion i
meetinq of February ?.4, 1492. , ,
~ ~~, ~~~1
~~_-~-~= ,~
CHAIRMAN~ APIAHEIMi TT PL NIN COMMISSION
i
ATTEST: '
_~'_4L'_~~ ~S . /Y ~~li2.r.a.~
SECRETARY, F.NAHEIDS CITY PLANNII4G COMMISSION ~
;
t
STATC OE CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ea. ;
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Flarris, Secrot3ry of the Anaheim City Planning
Commiseion, do horeby certify that the forogoing roeolution waa paseed a~d
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commiseion held on February
2A, 1992, Uy iche £ollooiing vote uf the membere thoreof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BRISTOL, HsI,1.YER, HGNNINGER, MESSF
PEP.AZA, ZEMEL
NOES: CQMMISSIOIIER5: NONE
ABSCNT: COMMISSIOttFRSs NQNE
IN +lI'PNESS
WHEREOF', i have herounto 1
set my hund •thin ~~~. d8Y ~
of ~~_, 1992. ~ ~
_
~ ~ ~~ ~/7-~"-'v~-.-~. ,
~ ~
SECRETARY~ ANANEIM CITY Pi.ANNTNG COMMISSION
-G- PC92-18