Resolution-PC 92-22RESOLUTI(~~l I40. PC92-22
A RES~LZ]TION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COASMISSION
TIiAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIF7CATION NO. 91-92-11 BP GRADiTED, UNCONDITTONALLY
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Plan~ing Comm+.ssion did receivo a
v6rified petition for ReclassiEicatian for real property eikuatod in the City
of Anahoim, County of Orange, State of CaliPnrnia, deecribed as followos
PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAH~IM, COUNTY. OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CA'LTFORNIA~ AS SHOWN ON A PARCEL MAP FlLED IN
BOOK 39, PAGE 42 OT' PAP.CE'f, MAPS, IN THR OEFICE OF TH~
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
NHEREAS, the city Planning Commieeion did hold a public hearin,q
at the Civic Center in the City of Anahaim on Februa~:y 24, 1992 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of eaid public hearing having been duly givon a~ requi.red by law and in
accordance with the pzovisione of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and conoider evidence for and against ~aid prapoeed reclaaeification
end t~ investigate and make finding3 and recommendations in connoction
therowith; and
WHEREAS, said Commiasion, aft~r clue inepection, i.nveatigation
and etudy made by iteelf and in its behal£, and after due considorati~n of all
evidence and reporte offered at eaid heazing, doas f-ind uncl detormine tho
following facte:
1. That• the petiti.oner propoeea reclaseification of subjoct
propezty from the RS-A-43,000 (keoide~itial/Agx~iculture) Eone to the ML
(Induetrial, Limited) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan deaignatea euUjecl; property
for Cenoral Industrial lar~d usea.
3. That the requeoted reclasRifica.tion is in conformance with
the C.ity'~ Gen~ral Plan.
4. That- Condition No. 16 oE Resaiution No. 91R-17 (approving
resvision ta Conditional Uep Pormit No. 1215) requirea the reclaseification to
the ML zone.
5. That tha proposed reclaseificstion of aubject property is
neceeeary and/or desirable for the orderly and propor clevelopment o£ the
community.
6. 'Chat the proposad reclaesif'ca~ion of aubject property doee
properly relate ~o the zonas and their permitted uses locally eatablie}ied in
cloee proximity to aub~ect property and to the zones and their perrni.tted usee
aenerally establiehed throughout the community.
CR1432MS -1- PC92-22
7. That no one ir.dicated their prosenr.e at said publia hearitig
in opponit.S.on; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to
aub~ect patitiun.
CALIFORNTA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anahei.m
L'ity Plan.i.tng Commission haa reviewed the propoeal to reclassify eubject
property from the RS-A-43,000 (Reaidential/Agriculturo) Zor~o !:o the ML
(Ind~ietrial, Limited) Zone on a rectan9ularly-shaped parcel of land conairtting
o# ap,proxj.mately 5.S acces, having a irontago o~ approximately 470 feet on tho
uc~uth aide ~P Carpentor Avenue, }iaving a maximum depth of appr~ximate.ly 450
foet, being J.ocated approximately £i0 feet east of the centerline oE Shepard
Street and further clascr.Lbed as 3200 F:set Carpenter Avenue; and does h9reby
approve the NQga*_ive Oeclaration upon finding that it hae coneidered the
'legative Dec.Laratio n together with any commente received during tho public
review pr~cpge an~l f urther finding ~n the baeib that the initiai etudy and any
c.~ommenta •recei_vod t hat there ia ne o~abstantial avidence that the project wi1L
liave a si9ni£icant effect on thu er~vironment.
NOW, THGREFURE, BE IT RESOLVED that the .4nuheim City Planning
Commisaion doea he reUy approve the subject Petitton for Reclassificatlon to
authoriza an amendn~enti to tY.o Zoriinq Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to
exclude the above -dec,:ri.bed property from the RS-A-43,000 (Reaidential-
Agriculture) Zono anc? ta incorporate eaid de~cribed propErty into the ML
(Industrial, Limited) Zone~ uncondi.tionally.
k;E ZT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval ~f thi.e application
co~isti.tutgo approval of the proposed request only tu tkie oxtent that it
compli~sn with the Anaheim Muricipal Zoning Code and any ather applicable City,
State and Federal regulatians. Approva.l. doee not i.ncludo any action or
findinge as to compliance or approvsl of the requaet regarding any other
applicable ordinancE, regulatiun or requirement.
BE IT rURTHER QESOLVED that this reaolution shall not conetitute
a rezoning of, or commitment by the City to re~one the aubject proper.tyj any
such roxoning ahal 1 requirQ ari ~rdinanc~ of the City Council which shall be a
legialative acL wh ich may be approved or. denied by the City Council at ite
sole discration.
~fHE FOREGOING RESOLUTION waA adopCed at the Planring Commioeion
medting of I'Ebruary 24, 1992. , ~
~ //
• i/%~~,n .~t~ Z.Z
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIlQ IT PLA G COMMISSInN
ATTGST: J
C~ ~ ~
'~' ' ~~~j(~' -
SECRETARY, ANAFIEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
t
-2- PC92-22
STATE OF C:ALIEORtiTA ) ~
COUNTY OF ORAtIGE ) Be.
CITY UF ANAHEIM )
i, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahefm City Planning
Commieeion, do har.eby cortify that the foreqoing resolutLon wae paseed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anuheim City Planning Com~nieaion hold on February
24, 1992, by the followinq vote o£ the mert~bers theroof:
AYESt COMMISSIONERSs BOUAS, DRI520L, HC?LLYER, HENNJNGER, IdESSE,
PERAZA , 2EMEL :
NOES: COM2fIS510t7ERSs NONE ,
AB5ENT: CUMMI5SION£RSt NONE
IN WITP~E~S WHEREOF, I have hereunro eot my hand thie ~ 3~'~ Qay
cf _1~,~,.,/~ .~t~•l. _, 1992.
,~
_~ ;
i[~-(/t.+..•-.
SECRE'fARY, CITY PLANtiSNG CO?IHISSION
-Z- PC92-22