Resolution-PC 92-26RESOIUTION N0.~92-2§
A RESOLUTIAN OF TH~ ANNHEIM CI1~ PLANNTNR CQMMISSION
THAT PETITION POR AECLA55IFSCATION iJO. 91-92-12 9~ GR}1NTEU
WY.EREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commieeion did r~coive a
vexified petition for ReclsASification for real property eituatAd in the City
Uf Anaheim, County af oranqA, State of California, daecr.ibed ag fo:4lcwes
THE NORTFl HALF OF THE WEST N.AI.F OF THE NOATHEAST
QUARTER OI' THE N~RTHWL~ST QUAHTER OF SEC'~ION 28,
TOWNSHIY 4, SQUTH, RANGE 10 WEST~ IN THE RANCHO LA3
HOLSAS, IN TH~ C2TY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORAt~GE~
STATE OF ~.'AI.IFORNIA, A3 P~R MAP RE~CORDL~^ IN AOOK 51~
pAr,E 10 ()cT MISCELLANF•OUS MAP3, RECORAS OF ORANOE
CdUNTY CALI~ORPiTA.
EXCEPT TIjEFtEFF20M THAT PORTION INCLUDEQ WITHIN TRACT
NO. 3240, AS PER MAP RECORD~q IN E'001C 113~ PAGE 1, 2
AND 3 OF' MISCFLLANEOUS MAP3~ RECOADS OF SAID ORANGE
CQUNTY.
ALSO EXCF.?T THF.RFF'ROM THAT PORTION IN~LUAEQ WITHIN Tk1E
LAND pE~C12x8ED IN DEED TO TFE ORANGE COUNTY xLOOD
CONTRQL D7STRICT, RECOROED IN BOOK 4069, PAG~ 188 OI~
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID OFtANGE COUNTY.
ALSO EXCEF'T THEREFROM T:iAT PORTIOIJ LYSNG NQRTHGRLY AND
WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRYBED LINE:
BB~;TNNINCi AT :HE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 37 OF 'PHTu
ABOVE MFNTIONED TRACT NO. 324Q~ THENCE AY.ONC THE
EASTI:RLY PROLONGATxON OF TfiE NORTH LYNE OF BAIQ LOT
37, NORTH 89" 13' 3Q" EAST 10.18 FEETf THENCE IJORTN
00° 55' 30" WEST 186.00 FL~ET TO THE NORTH LINL 4F SATD
SECTTUN 28.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commieaion ~lid hold a public l~earing
at tho Civic Conter in the City oi An~hei.m on Pebruary S0, a992 at 1s30 p.m.,
noei.ce o£ esid public hearing havinq boen duly given ae rec~uired by lnw and in
accordanr,e with the provieions of th~ Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hoar and coneide.r evidence ~or and a~afnat eaid propoaed reclnesification
and to invectigat~ and make findinge and recommendatio~ie in c~nnection
therewiths a~d that eaid public hearinq wae Contin~s4d to the March 9, 1992
Planning CornmiaBion meeL•ing; and
WHEREAS, esid Commiesion, afrer dua inepectinn, L~rveoti.yat.ion
and et~dy made by itoalt and in ite behalE, and after due conoiderat~ion of a11
evidonca snd reportg offered at eaid hearing, doeo find and det~rmine the
following facts:
CR1442MS -1- PC92-26
1. That the petltioner proposee realueeification of subject
pr~perty from the RS-A-43,000 (Reeidential/Agriciiltural) Zono to the CL
(Commer.ctal, Limited) or a laoa intenee zone.
2. That •che Anaheim Goneral Plan doeignatee aubject prap~rty ,
fo.r Genaral Commercial lanc4 use~.
3. That the proposod reclaseificntion aP eubjer.t property is ~
neceeaary ~nd/ar desirable for the or.dbrly and proper developmont of the f
r.omrrunity.
h. That the propoead recla~oifl.cntion of eubject praperty dooe
properl} relate to tho zonea ~nd thoir p~rmittod ueee locr.::y eetabliehed in ;
close proximity to aubject property and to the zones and th~tr permitt9d ueea
generally eotablished throughout the aommunity. '
5. That tho proposed reclaeeification of aubject property
roquires the dedication and improvement of abutting etreete in accordance with ;
the Circulatinn Element of the Gene~al Plan, duo to the anticipated increaee
iri traffic Which will be generated Uy tho inteneifiaation of land uee.
6. That two (2) intereeted pereond indicated thelx pzeeenca at
the public hearingT ~r.3 that no one indicatad thoir preeence at aaid public
haaring in oppoeition; and that no correepanflonce was received in oppoeition
to aubject pe*.ition.
r~A1.IFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUAL~,Y~,C~T FINDINC3: That the Anaheim
Ci.ty Planning Gommiseion hae reviewed tho propoeal to reclsealPy aubject
propQrty from rhe lts-A-43,000 (Reaidential/Agricultural) Zone to tha CL '
(Commercial, I.imited) or a leee intense zone to permit a commercial retail !
center conai.eting of 8,Q93 squara £eet of office uee, 481 aquare Peot of ~.
retail uso and 424 eq~are feet of reetaurant uea nr~d with waivor mauimum fence '
hoight on an irregularly ehaped parcel of land coneiotinq of approximately
0.83 acres, having an approxi~nate frontage of 132 feat on the eouth siQe of
Katc-1].a Avenue and a maximum depth of 263 feet, being lucq~ad approximatalX
650 feet weat of the centerlin~ of Ninth SCreot and further described an 1556
Weet Katella Avenue; and does hereby approve the Neqative Daclaration upon
finding that the draclaration ref7.eats the indepondent j~dyament of tho lead
agency, that it haa considore~i th~ Negative Declaration together wi.th any
commento received during the public reviow procese and further findinq on the
basis that the initial otudy and any commentB reaeivod that there is no
~ubotantial evidence tl~at the projc+ct will h3ve a eignificant offeot on the
eiivironment .
NOW, THBREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED that tho Anahaim City Planntny
Commioeion doea her<:F~y approve the eubject Petition fur RAClneeific.ation to
nuthorize an amendmc~it to the Zoning Map of the Anahoim Municipal Code to
oxclude the above-d~:ecribad propert}~ from tha RS-A-43,000 (Residential-
Agricultural) 2one ~~:~~i to incorporate said deecribed property into the CL
(ComrQrcial, Limited) '~.~.~ne upon tho following conditione which ar.e hereby
-2~ PC92••2?i
found to bo n necessary pr~erequisite to the proposod u~a o£ subjdct property
in order to proeerve the eafety and general welfarg of th~ Citizene oE tho
City of Anaheim:
1. * That ~ fee for etreet lighting purpoaeg eha11 be paid to thA Oity of
Anaheim baeed on the .length of otreeti £rantnge along Katelle Aven~a in an
amount ae eatabliehod by City Council resalukion.
2, * That a Pae Eor etreet tree purpoeee ehall be paid to tl~e Ci.ty o£ Anaheim
based on the longth oE etreet frontago alanq Katella Avenue in an amount
~s establiehad b,y City Council reaolution.
3. That the legal property owner ehall irrevocably afger to dodicate to th~
City of Anaheim an easement eixty (SQ) foet in width £rom tho centorlina
of the etreet along Katella Avenue Eor str9et widening purposes.
4. That prior to plaaem9nt of an ordinanoe rozoning eubject praperty o:i an
ayenda for City Council coneideratiun, Condition Nos. 1, 2 an~ 3,
above-mentioned, shall be comploted. The City Counc~l may apprcve or
dieapprove a zoning ordinar.co at its diecretion. I£ the ordinance ie
dieapprovad, the procedure set forth in Anaheim MunScipal Code Section
18.Q3.085 ahall apply. The provisions or righto granted by this
reeolution shall bocom~ null and void by ection ~£ the Planninq
Commisaion unlese eaid conditions are complied witt within one (1) year
from the date of thie resalution, or euch furthQr time a0 the Plnnning
Commiesion may grant.
5. * That approval of this application constitutes approval o£ the propoeed
requeet only to the extent that it compliee with tha Anaheim Municipal
2oning Code and any other applicable City, St~te and Federal
regulationa. Ap~roval doee not inolude any action ar £indingo aa to
cAmpliance or. approval of the roqueet regarding any other appllcable
ordinanae, regulation or reqt:ire~nent. Conditions markod with an aster3ak
~~) are roquired by eet~bliehod lawe, codee, regulations and agr~emonta
and are, therefore, not eubject to negc+i~tion.
BE IT FURTHER PESOT.VED that thie reeulut.ion ohall not conatituta a
cezoning o£, or commitment by the City to reaune the subject prqpertyT any such
cezoi~ing ehall require an ordinance o£ the C±ty Counci.l which ehall be 1
legialative act which may be approved or denieS by the City Council at ita solo
discr,~tion.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVGD khat the Anaheim City Planning Cor.uniseion doee
hereby find and determine thak adopti~on of thie Resolution ie expressly
predicaked upon applicant's cornpliance with each and all of the conditione
horeinabove se*. forth. Should any auch condition~, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court uf
competent jurisdiction, then thia As~olution, and any approvale herein
contained, ehall bR deemed null and void.
-3- pC92-26
THE FOREGOING RESQLUTIODI wae a~opted at the Plunning Commieoion
meeting of March 5, 1952. 1C-'" ,
-~ ~~~~~~ -
CHAIRMAN~ ANAHEIM,C~~ITY P NIN COMMISSION
~r
ATTESTt
; r. - - '~' ~.~?L2.:r.--="
,SEC rARY, ANAHE2~Y PLANNiNG CoMMi3STON
(.._
STATC OF CALIFU[?r7iA ) ~
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) aD.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
i
I, J'anet L. Jen~an, Secretary o£ the Anaheim City Planning ;
Commioaion, do aereby cortify that the foregoinq rosolution wao pacaed and ~
adopted at a meatirig of the Anaheim City Planninq Cammiseiun held on March 9, ;
1992, by the following vato oE the membora thereof:
AYCS: COMMISSIONGRS: BOUAS~ BRISTOL~ HELLYER~ HrNNINCiER~ MESSE~
PERAZA~ ZEMEL
NOES: COMMISSIONER5: NONE
ABS~NT: CCMMISSIONERS: NONE
1,,^1' `WITNESS WHEREOF, I havo hereunko set my ha.nd this 7 !~~ day
of ~/~~ 1992. ~I
I
S It~TARY, ANAFi~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~~~ II
(~ ' /
-4-