Resolution-PC 92-30RESOLUTIO tJO. PC9,~Q
A RESOI~UTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMAtISSYON
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 4175 BE DENIED
WHERGAS, the Anaheim City Planning CommieQi~n did receive a
verified Petition for Variance Eor certain real property situated in the City
of Anahoim, County of Orange, State of California described as:
PARCEL 1: PORTIONS O~ LOT THAEE OF HEIN'S
SUHDZVISION, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AS SHOWN 0t7 A
MAP RGCORDED IN BOOIC 10~ YAGE 40 OF MTSCELLANEOUS
MAPS, RECOPDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA~ vESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER LINE OF $UNKIST
STREET NORTH 0° 19' 00" EAST 47~.00 F~ET FROM THE
CENTER LINF. OF SOUTH STREET) THENCE NORTH f1° 19' 00"
EAST RLONG SAID CENTER LINE ~)F SUNKTST STREET 103.00
P'EL~T TO A POINTt THENCE SOUTH 89° 45' 00" EAST
F'AR}1LLEL WITH THC CENTER LIl~E OF SOUTH STItEET 220.00
P'F.ET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTIi 0° 19' 00" WFRT 103.00
FEET TO A POINT; TFIENCE MOCtTH 89° 45' 00" WEST 220.00
rEET TO A dO.LNT AF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2: THE WE~STERL'C 220.00 FEET OF LOT 3 OF
HEIN'S SUBDLVISION AS SFiCWN ON A MAP RECORDED TN BOOK
10~ PAGE 40 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF OFiANGE
COUNTY. FOR THE F'URPOSES OF THIS DESCRIPTI~UN THF LOT
LINES ARE CONSIDERED AS HEING THE CENTERLINE OF
uUNKIST STRGET AND SOUTH STREET AS SHOWN ON 3AID MAP.
EXCGPTING THSREFROM THE SOUTHERLY 575.OQ F':FTr
MEASURED ALONG THE CGNTERLINE UF SAID SUNTCI5T ST:~ET,
TY.EREOF.
PARCEL 3: THE SOUTHERLY 472.00 FEET OF LOT 3 QF
HEIN'S SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN ON A MAP IiECOFtDED TN BOOK
10, PAGE 40 OF MISCELLAI~EOUS MAPS~ RLCORDS OF ORANGU
GOUNTY. FOR THE PURPOSES QF TH.LS DESCRIPTION THE LOT
LINES ARE CONSIDCRED AS BEIl7G Tk1E CENTE1tLINL~S OF
SUhKIST STRE~T AND SOUTH STREE; AS SHOWN ON SAIU MA°.
EXCEPTlNG THER~FROM THL~ SQUTHERLY 404.00 FEET~
MEASUkED AT KJGHT ANGLES, THF.REOF.
WNEREAS, the City Planning Commieaion did hold a public h9aring
at the Civia Center ih the city of Anaheim on March 9, 1992, at 1:30 p.m.,
notica of snid public hearing having been duly givon as required by law ar.d in
uccordance with the provi.sione of the Anah~im Munf.cipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to haar and a~nsSdQr evidence for and against sa.id proposad variance and to
i:-vestigato and make findings and recommendatione in connoction thezewithj and
CR1446MS -1- PC92-30
WHEREAS, said Cortun~esion, after duo ina~ecL•ion, inveetigati.on
and study mado by itself arid in ite behnlf, and after due consideLation oi all
evidence and reports offer~d at said hearing, doea ~ind and determine the
following facta:
1. That ~he petitionqr proposog waivore oP tho lollowing to
conetruct a 10-unit condominium camolexs
(1) SE~TIONS~B.OQ.043.101(al - Maximum fer~ce heiaht.
~~10 18.31.064 (3 ee permit~ed~ §~eo,t proposed)
(2) SECTTUN 18.31.062•0~2 - i~aximum str~etura~,hoiah .
(1 ot~ permitted within ~Q feet of
eingle-£amily reeidential zoningt ~.
B orlea, propoaed ~Q foet from RS-7200 and
RS-A-43,U00 zoning)
(3) SECTION 18.31.063.024 - Reguired eetback a@incent ~o einale-fami~v
residentiq~ zoninq.
(Mitiimum 0 feet £ully landacapod setback
requiredJ ].0 to 2Q eet pzopoeed to
RS-A-43,000 a~ning)
2. That there aro no apecial circumstances applicable to the
praperty such ae size, shape, topography, loeation or surroundingg, which do
not apply to ot}~er identically zoned properties in tha vicini.tyi
3. That etrict application of the Zoning Coda will not depri•~e
the property of privilagee en;oyed by other proportiee in iclentical zoning
claseification in the vicinityj
4. That approval of tho waivero adjacent to exioting
eingle-family reotdential uses would adveraely affect eaid ueeej
5. That although the propoeed duplox daaign of the project m+~y
be compatible with adjoining eingle £arnily residences, the proponed reeidentiAl
doneiGy is nct compatible with the eurrounding G~nersl Plun Low-Denisty
Residential lnnd use deeignatiun, and that approviug the propoeal would res~~lt
in an iAOlated pocket of higher deneity uses ("spot zoning")1 anc!
6. That nineteen (t9) peoplo indicated their preeence at aaid
public hearing in opposit'_onj and that correopondence wae receivod in
opponition to subject petition.
CALII'4RNTA ENVIAONMENTAL OUALITY ACT FINDING: Thst the Annhoim
City Planning Commioeion rias reviewed the propoenl faX waivero of maximum fence
h~ighL•, maximum etructural height and required eetback adjacent to
eingle-£amily residential zoning to conetruct a 10-unit condaminium complex on
a r.ectanyularly-ehaped parcel of land r.onei~ting of approximately 1.A7 acres,
having a fr~ntage of approximstely 268 feet on the eae~ aide of 5unkiet Street,
_2_ PC92-3U
having a maximum depth of approximately 175 £eet, boing located approximately
A00 £eet north o£ the centerline of South Street and Eurthor describod ae 610
South Sunlsiat Streetj and doe~ hergby approve the Negative Declaration upon
£inding that the declaration re£locta the indepondent judgoment of the lead
agency, that it hae conaider9d the Nogativo Doclaration together with any
commento received during th~ publi. review proceee and Eurther findinq on thg ~;
baeis that tho initial etudy and any ~ommente received bhat there ie no ~
aubatantial evidence that the project wi11 havo u eignlEicant eEfoct on the ;
environmont. ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE XT RESOI+VED that the An~heim City Planning
Commiseion doee hereby deny subject Potition for Variancs on the baeie of the
~forementi.oned Eindinge.
THE FOKEGOING RESOLUTION waa adopted at the Planning Commiesioct
sneoting oE March 9, 1992• ~ ' ~
.'
_~/' . i:~' •'~ _
RMAN, ANAHEIM TY PLANN~ G CO ISSION
ATTEST: C~
L "
~~ ~(~-1 /Zc.~GI~ ~?J~U~U'
SECRETAR ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUt7TY OF ORANGE ) eg•
CITY OF ANAHETM )
T, Mar.9arita Solorio, ~ecretary of the Anaheim City Planninq
Commiaeion, do hereby certify that the £oregoing reeulution wae paesed and
adopted at a maetinq oi the Anaheim City Planninc~ Commiseion hald on March 9,
1992, by the ~a].lowing vote of the membere therooE:
AYES: COMldISSIONERS: BOUAS, BRISTOL~ HELLYER~ HLNN.l'NCiER~ ME3SL~~
PERA'/.A, ZEMEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
A9SENTs COMMI.^iSIONliRS: NONE
I,N,l,~WITNE5S WHEP.EOF, I have horaunto eat my hand thlA X~~' d85'
of ~~~/~~ 1993.
(1~"l ~~1:t~ ~~ ~,~ .
SECRETAFY~~ NAHrIM CITY PL}1NN=NG COMIdISSION
-3- PC92-30