Resolution-PC 92-37F~SULUTIOPLNO. Pl` ?_37
A REl30LUTION OF THS ANAHL~IH CITY PLANNYNC3 COMMI3STON
xHAT PETITIOtI FOR CONDIT20NAL U3E PERHIT NO. 3504 BE 3RANTEll
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Cemmieoion did receivw a
vorified PetiCion !os Coruiitional Uoe Permit ior cerY.ain real p.roper.y
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Ora~ge, ttate oC Ca~ifornia.
deecribed ae:
THAT PORTIOIJ OF BLOCK D OF DAVIS BROS. ADDITION, A3
PRR HAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PACES 632 AND 633 OF
MISCEI.LANEdUB RECUROS, IN THE OE'FICE OF THE COUNTX
RECORDER OF L03 ANGLLES COUNTY, CALSFOANT71, UESCRIHED
J1S FOLLOW3:
BEGItSNItiG AT THE NOR'i'HEAST COIiNBR OP LOT 6 OF S112D
BLUCK Df THE:iCL+ SOUTHEP='; 147.50 FBET !-LONC~ TH1L
L~ASTSRLY T~INE OF SAID LOT G TG THE SOUTIiEAST CORNER
THL~REOFJ THENCE WESTEALY 63.14 FEET AI.ON(3 THE
COUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6 TO THE NORTHFAST ~VRNER
OF LOT 12 O: SAID BLOCK D1 THENCE SOUTHERLY 213.26
FEET A.'.ON~3 ?FiB FAS?L-RLY LINES Ol- I.fYI'3 12 ANA 9 OP SAID
BI.OCK "D" TO ~HE SOUTNERLY LINE OF SRID SIACY.; TFIENCB
WLSTERLY A1~ONG THE SOUTHENLY 1.INE OP 3AID BI.CC![ D TA
THL $OIITHWE3TERLY CORNBR THEREO[~i TIiENCR NORTHERLY
260.b6 YBET hLONG THS WLSTEItLY L2NE O! SAID DLOCK TO A
POINT +37.50 FERT NOR'CHBRLY OP THE SOUTHWEST CORNBR OY
C,OT 11 OF SAID BLOCIC D~ TFIENCE EASTERLY P11R)1LLEL WITH
TNS SOUTHERLY LINE O! SI~ID LOT 11 A DIS'f11NCE OY 77.06
lEST 'TO TH~ SOUTHWE3T CORNER O! THE LAIiO DESCRIBSD IN
C1RED TO TF{ONJ13 H. PR~NK A[iD WIFE, RECORDED YtBRUl1RY 5,
1968 2N 800K 0509. PAGE b81, OFPICII-L RBCORD8) TNENCE
NORTKEA~.Y ALONCi TfiE WESTERLY L2N8 4P Sl-SD L712iD OF
TROt4AS B. PkANR 10U.00 PE6T TO THE NuRTHP.RLY LSNE OF
bAID BLOCK D~ TFIENCE 8113TERli.Y 139 ~ 52 PEE"_' ALONCi SAZO
NO~iTHP:RLY LINfi TO THE POINT OY BBGINNING.
SXCEPT THE SOUTHL-RI.Y 10.00 PL-ET OF SAIO LOT 9.
71L30 EXCSP'T THL+ WEST6FtLY 10.00 TEET OP SAID LAND.
NHtiLgl-8, th~ City Dlanninq Commioe.'.cn Cid hold a public h~~rinq
at the Civic CQnt~r in the C;ty of Anaheim on March 23, 1992, at 1t30 p.~.r
notico of •si6 public hosrin~ havlag been duly qiven a~ requirocl by law enQ in
acaozdanco with tho provirione of tho /-naheim Municip++l Ccxle, Chapter 1l3.03, ko
hsar end consider evid~nc~ for and egain~t eaid propoosd conditional uoe p~rmit
and to Snvertiqat~ and meko if.nding~ and r~canmen~etlon^ in connsetion
thorowitt~s an~!
CR1456MS -1- PC92-37
WHEREAS, eaid Commieei,on, after du• .inepocti4n, invootignti~t~ and
study made by iteelf and in iL•a behalf, and nEte+r due coneideration ~! all
ev.idenco and rop~arte otfored at 0aid hoari.nq, dooe fird anct detorminA the
followi.ng fncte:
1. ThaC the pzopaHad uee ia propor.ly ono £or .~hich a conditionul
uae permit .ta authorized by Annhelm Municipal Code tiecti~n 18.41.050.070 to
permit an 8,300 aq.tt. ahurch in an exieting 27,100 eq.ft. building with taaiver
Qti
§Er,TIQNS 18•Q¢,~~$0.0212 - Fs.4~l,~m_~4,=^_~z"~~er ot va;}~ na ecee.
~,Q.06.OS0.0266 (~¢,~, requiredj ~7 exieting)
St3•C1~ 050.031
1,$.06.060
ana 1f3.b1.066.050
2. That the parking var.ianco will not cause en incra~aae in
traffic congestion in tha i~nmediato vicinity nor sdv~reely attact any adjoininq
land useo and thnt tha ~ecIuoated parkinq watver wao eubstantia~ed by a psrking
etudy with which City Traffic Engineoring ataff cbncurrod.
3. ~Phat the qrantinq oi the pnrking varinnaQ undar the
conditione impooed will not be datrimantal to ths penc~, health, 4afety or
genural welfare of the citixene c,f the City of Anaheim.
4. Thst the propoaed uee ia properly one for ~rhich a conditionsl
use permit i• autborizod by the 2oning Codet and that no other uees aro
propoead in the same hulldinq thereby 1lmiting the intenstty of uaee on subjact
property.
S. That tho proposed uoe will not arlv~rsely ettect the adjoininq
land useo and the growth ~nd clevelopmont of the aroa in which it io proponsd to
be locnted beca•~ae aubject ahurch le compatible with the surroundi.ng lnnd uoes.
6. That th~ oiza and rhrpo of tho oito Yor cho pzopoood uae So
adnquato to allow th9 Full develop~ront af the propauQd use in a mann~r nct
detri.mental to the particular aroa nor to the peac~e, health, eafsty, and
general welfnre.
7. :hat the trafiic gcnoratod by the pro~osed uoo will not
impo0o an undu• burd~n upon tho utraetA cnd highwayo deeiqned ~nd improved to
carry the trnffic in tha area.
8. That thn granting oi the conditior~nl u~• pormit undAx th~
conditionr impoeud will nnt bo detri.muntal to the poace, h~alth, aafoky and
q~neral wolfare ~f thQ citizens of the City ot Anaheim.
9, That t.he council chsmber aae filled to rap~city d~ith pfoyle
in ~avor of subjoct ;,~etiCion and thht no one inQl.cated thnir pr~.onc~ in
oppoef.tian ~t eald public hearf.nqi nnd that no corre~pondencs wso raceiv~d !c-
dpponitlon to tha oubject patition.
-2- PC92-37
c^~,,,T~,$ORt7IA E~]V~RO,~J~(F~3TA= QU]-LITY ,~T__F~LiAINOs That the Anaheim
City Planninq Commieeion hxs reviewed tho prapoeal to permit an 8,300 eq.ft.
chuich ir. an exieting x7,100 eq.ft. builcling with weiver o£ minimum number of
purking opacoo an an i.rreq~ale~rly-ehapod parcel af land coneieting of
approximatel.y 1.44 ecr.ee, lo^..ated on the northuaet corner of Santn Ana Streot
and Harbor Boulavard, having approximate frontage~ of 150 feet on the north
aide of Santa Ana Street, 355 feet on the eaet eide o~ Harb~r Baulevard and 140
feet on thd south Bide o! Elm 3treat, and :urthor deearibed ae 420 south Harbor
13oule~vardr and doee hereby epprove the Naqative Declaration upor- findinq that
the declaration reflects L•he indepondent judgement of the lead ayency and tha:
it hae coneidered the Negative Declaratian together with any commentd receivod
during the ~ublic xeviow pr~ceee esnd Purth~r Lind±ng an tha basio that the
iiiitial atudy and nny comments received that there is no subetanl;ial evid~nce
that the projec.t will have a eignificank effact on the environment.
NOW, THEREFO~, BE IT RESOLVED that the Annheim City Planning
Commieeion dooc hereby grant eubject PAtition for Conditional iiaa Pormit, upon
tho •Lollowing conditione which are heraby found to be a ner.eaaary prorequisite
S:o tlia propoewd ueo of. the Bubject property in ordor to pre~orve the oafety and
ganeral. welfara of the Citisene of the Ci.ty of Anaheims
1. * Thet prior to ieeuance oi a buildi~ig permLt, n traffic eignal nAaeeement
£oe equsling the dif~erence betwoen the canmerele~l and ahurch aesaoement
feee ahall be pai.d tn the City of Anaheim in an amount se ostabliohad by
City Council Reoalution.
~, rhati all drivawayu on ehall bn ra~conetructoc2 to acc:ommodats tan (10) Loot
radius curb returna in conFormance with Enqineerir.g Departmsnt 3tandarda.
3. That the wuter backflow wquipment and any other ~.arqs wnker oystem
equipment ehall bo inntalled ta tha eatiofaction o! tha Watqr Utility
Divieion in either: (ay undergrou»d vaulta or (b) b~hind the ~traet
aetback nrea in a manner fully ecreened from nll publi.c etrsete and
elleya.
4. • That fire eprinklera ehall be in~talled ae required by the Fira
Dapartment.
5. That a P1an Shaet !or solid wnote etorag~ and collection nnd a plsn !or
recyc.ling ehall be aubmittQd tn ths Depar.tment of Maint~nanca for r~evi~w
and approval..
6. That a local fir~a alarm eyetum phall be inetalled ao reqvired by tihe Piro
DApertment.
7. Th+~t eubjoct progerty shell be devRloped eu5utantielly in accordance witi~
plenA and o~ecificatione eubmiCted to thf City ot Ansheim by th~
petitioner and which pl~nb are on tile aith tho planning Dapartment
marked Exhibit Now. 1 tl-rough 4.
8. Th~t prfor to commenceRen~ of the activity herein approved,~a~ ~~~r tc
iQSU6nce o! a building permit, or wl.thir~ a period ot nne (1) y
_3_ CC92-37
the date aE thi~ reeolation, wt~ichover ocaurg £~.at, Conditian Noe. 1, S
and 10, heroin-menttoned, nhall be complied with. Extonsiano For £urther
time ta complete asid c~n~itione may be granted in accordanr.e with
SecY.ion 18.03.090 of L•ha Anaheim Munici.pal Code.
9. That pr~or camme~lcomenr, of tho activity herein appruved or prior to final
buil~in3 and r.oninq inepection~, whichever occurs firet, Condition Noe.
2, 3, 4, 6, and 7, above-montion~d, shall be complf.ed wi~h.
10. That the owner of aubjec~ property ehall ~ubmit a letter t~ the Zoning
Divieion requesting termination o£ Varianco No. 909.
11. * That approval oF thie applicati~n con~tit~~tes approval of tho propoaed
request only to the extsnt that it compliee with the Anaheim Mu~icipnl
Zoning Code and any other npplicable City, State and Federal
regulatione. Approval does not include eny action or lindinge ao ta
aomplianae or approval of the .requegt zegarding nny otlier ap~licable
or~inance, regulation or requirement. Conditione mnrked with an aateriek
(*) are required by oetabli~hed lawe, cocleo, requlationa and agreementa
and are, thnrePuss, not eubject to negntia~ioi~.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pla:ining Cammie0ion
doea hereby ~ind and dekermine that adoption of this Reeolution te oxpreooly
predicated upon applicant'd comPliance with each and nll of tha conditiona
hereinabove eet Porth. Should any euch candition, or any part thereof, be
declarod invalid or unenforceable by the £inal judgmer.t of any court o~
competent juriodiction, thon thia Reoolution, and any approvale her~in
containe~, ehnll be doemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLU'PION wan adopt•ed a~ the P a g Commiaeion
meeting of liarch 23, 1992. ~
i/
Hl1IRMAN, ANAHL~IM C Y P NINa CO! SION
ATTE^uTt
_ y~~~~~.~~.~
SECRE_ r ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMI~tI$SION
S1'ATF OF CALIFOFtNiA )
COUNTY OF URANC,E ) ge.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita solorio, secretary of t.he Annheim City Planninq
Cammieeion, do hereby cortiFy that tha E~rogoinq reeolution was paeoed and
adopted at a meetinq of the '~iiaheim City Pla~ning Commieeion held on March 23,
1992, by the following vote o£ tho membere thezeoFs
AYESs COMMI33IONERSs BOUAS~ BRISTOL~ HELLYER, HENNINGEf1, PERAZA~ ZEMEL
NCESs COMlSTS3IONERSs tiONE
118SENT: COHHISSIONERSs MESS~
IN WITNL~SS WHL~REOF, I heve hereunto eet my hand thie h~~ day
of _~~7~~ ~ 1992. .6'.
~CI~~ ~CO ~._.
SECRET Y, AHETM C1TY PL7INNING COl4HZ~3ION
-4- PC92-37