Resolution-PC 92-4313~~)LN.S?~ PC~3_
A RESOLiJTION UP TI-IE ANAHEIM CITY FLAMNI7JG COMMISSION
'I'E-IAT PETITION FOR C'ONDIT[ONAL USE PERMIT NO, 3512 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petitinn tor Conditional Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, Counry of Orunge; State of California, described ~ts:
A~'ORTION OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK 5 OF THE GnLDEN STATE
'I'RAC'I', 4S SHOWH ON A MAP RE~ORDF,D IN BOOK 4,
PArES 66 AND 67 OF MISCE~.L.ANEOUS MAI'S, FECORDS OF
ORANGE c;OUNTY, C'AL.IFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLT.OW5:
PARCEL 1, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILCD IN ROOk 1G1, PAGES
~i7 AND 48 OF YARCEL MAPS, 1N '1'EiE OFFICE Or 'THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF Sl~-ID ORANGE CQUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Pl:~nnin~ Commission did hold a public hearing ut the
Civic Center in the City of Anlheim on April 6, 1992, at 1:30 p.m.~ notice of said public
t~earing having been duly given as required by law and in accordu~ce with the provisions of
tl~e Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against
said proposcd conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and
recommendat+~ms in connection therewith; and
WHEkFAS, s:iid Commission, afte~ duc inspection, investigutinn ~-nd study
maJ~e by its.°lf and in its betialf, and aE'ter due consideration of all evidence and reports
offercd at said hearin~, does Crid and determine the Yollowing facts:
1. That the Qroposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permie is autbvrized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.61.050.b01 to permit an auto
rr.pair fasiliry with waiver of the followin~:
~ectiong,~,(1~i.050.02.12 - Minimum numbcr af_~jn~~~.
18.06A5U.0222 (]#} required; ,1Q e~cisting)
13~i.Q.~Q~431
t8.o6.080
~nd 1g.61.Ofi~~Q
2. That thc proposcd parkinR has tr~cn approved by the City TrRffi.,
Enbineering Divician;
3. That thc pa~king variancc wili n~t c.~use an incrcasc in traf~c
conge~tion in the immedi:-tc vicinity nor aJvcrsely aftcct any adjoiiiing land uses;
CR 14G6MS.wp - t- PC92-43
4. That the granting of the parking variance under the conditions imposed
will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety or genera! welfare of the citizzns of the
City of A,nahcim;
5. That the proposed usc is properly one for which a cnnditional use
permit is authorized by the Zoning Code;
6. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses
und the growth and development of the area in which it is propos~ed tn Ue located;
7. '1'hat the size and shape of the site for the proposed use is adequute to
allow the full developme~~t of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
~articular area nor to tlie peace, health, safety, ancl general welfare;
8. That the traf~c ge«erated by the proposed use will not impose an
undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area becauss ths majority of work to be p~rformed on-site will be performed in
c~aperation with local auto dculerships and will not be fnr the general public;
9. That the grlnting of the conditic~nai use permit under th~ conditions
imposed will not be detrimcntai to thc peace, hcaath, safety and general welfare of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim; and
1Q. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
~pposition; und th:~t no corresponclence was reccived in oppositiuri to the s~abject peiitiun.
~j,iFORN1A_ ENVIRONMEL~1'AL OUALITY ACT i'INDINv: That thc
Anaheim City Ptanning Commission lt:t.s reviewed the propos~il to permit an autc~ repair
facility ~vith waiver of minimum number of parking sp~ices on a rectangularlyshuped parcel
of land consisting of approximately 0.27 acre h:iving an approximate frontage of 110 feet on
the r~orth side of La Jolla Strect, a maximum depth of appraximately 110 feet, being located
appraximatcly 225 feet east of the centerline of Red Gum Strcet and further described us
2971 East I.a Jolla Strce;t; anc~ docs hereby approve thc Negative Declarntion upon ~nding
th~t tha declaration reflects the indcpendcnt judgcment of ti~e lead agency and thlt it has
cons9dercd ihe Negative Declaration togcther with any comments received during the publEc
revicw pr~cess and further finding on ths basis of tha initial study and uny commen~s
receivecl that therc is no substanti;il cvidence that the project will have a signi~cant effect
r~n the enviror~ment.
NOW, '1'~~ERErORE~ (iE IT RESOI.VED that thc Ar~ah~im City Planning
~ommission docs hcrcby gr:~nt subject Pctition for Conditional Use Pcrmit, upon thc
fullowing rnnditions which urc hercby fcwnd ta tzc a~ neccssary prcres~uisite t~ the proposcci
~~sc; of the subject property in ordcr t~ prc~erve thc safety and gencral weifarc of the
Citizens of thc City oF Anahcim:
-2- 1'C92-43
1. That a Z'lan Sheet for solid waste storage and collection and a plan for recycling shall
be submitted to the Department of Maintenance for review actd approval.
2. " That plans shall bc submittcd to the ~ity Traffic and Trar.sportat~on Manager far his
review and approval showing conformance witn the l~ttest revision af Engineering
St~nndard Plan Nos. 43G and 602 pertaining to parking standards ~tnd driveway
locations. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and m~-intained in
confnrmance with said plans.
3. That the driveway on L,a Jolla Street shall be reconstructed to accommodate fifteen
(15) foot radius curb retun~s in conformance with Enginesring Department
Standard5.
4. ' That fire sprinklers shalt be in.5talled as required by the Fire Departir.ent.
5. ' That a fee for strcet lighting purposes shall be paid to the City of Anaheim based on
the lengtti of street frontage along L~ Jolla Stre~t in an amount as established by
City Council resolution.
6. ' That a fee for street tr~e purposes shall be paid to the City of Anaheim based on the
len~th of street frontage along I.a Jolla Street in an amount as established by City
Council resolution.
7, That ao outdaor storage of, display of, or work on vehicles or vehicular parts shall
be Qermitted.
8. That any proposed freestanJing sign on subj~ct property shall be ~t monument-type
not ~xceeding ei~ht (8) feet in height and shall ~~e suUject to the review and approval
of tY,e City Traf~c and Transportation Manager to cfetermine adequat~ lines-af-sight,
9. 'Chat no banners or otizer te~nporary advertising shall b~; displayed in tt~e service bay;
facing ths public right-of-way.
10.' That thc on-site lundscaping and irrigation system shall be maiiitained in compliance
with City standards.
11. That subje~:t propcrty shall be devcloped substantially in accordance with plaas and
specifications ~ubmitted to the City of .~nah~im by the petitioner and which plans are
on ~le with the Planning Dcpartment marked Lxhibit No. 1.
12. That prior to ~ommencement of the activity luthorized by this resolution or within
a period of one (1) year from the date of thi; resolution, whichever accurs first,
Conditiort Nos. '1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 1], above-rnentioned, shall be complied with.
Extensions for further time to complcte said ccmditions may be granted in arcarduncc
with Section 18.03.090 nf the Anaheim hlunicipa! Code.
-3- PC52-43
13. ''I'hat approval of this application constitutes approval of the propos~d request only
to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Muni~;ipul Zoning Code and any
oth~r applicablc City, State und Pedcral regiilations. Approval does not include any
action or findings as to complianc~ or approval of the request re~;arding aiiy c~ther
~pplicable ordinance, regulation or cequirement. Conditions marked with an usterisk
(•) are required by established laws, codes, regul~ttions and agreements arid are,
therefore, not subject to nrgatiation,
BE IT FURTHER ItESOLVEll that the Anaheim City Planning Commis:;ion
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is espressly pr.edicated
upon applicant's compliance wiih each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Shoiild any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared inv~lid or unenforceable by the
final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resoluti~n, and any
approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FORFGUING R LU'I'ION ~was adupted p.t iha Planning Commission
cneeting of April 6, 1992. ~ ~
~. l'v' I 2
C I N, ANAHEIM I P hNING OMMISSION
ATTES'T:
,~ ~YY~Q'.jZC ~ , Gu ( ~Co/G~o~-
SFCRE'tA t~Y, AHEIM GITY PLANNING CCMMISSIUN
STATE OF CALiFORNIA )
CUUNTY C)F ORANGF ! ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solori~~, Secretary of the ~~naheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify tt~at the foregoing resolutiun was passed and adoFted at a meetin~ of the
Anaheim Ciry Planning Commission hcid on April 6, 1992, by the following votc of the
members thereof:
AY~S: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BRISTUL, ~-IEE.LYER, HENNINGER, MESSE,
PERAZA. ZCMEL
NOES: CUMMISS[ONERS: N~NE
A~iSGNT: COMMISSIONERS: NON~
IN WITNESS WHERCC~P, I have hereunto set my hand this ~" r~' day of
' ~ 1992.
c , ~/
- -1.~'. ~C ~~ /i.~ , ~ ~ ~tc.~ ~
~ SECRCTEI(I~~ ~~AI-IEIM CITY PI.ANNING COMMiSSION
.4_ PC92-43