Resolution-PC 92-44RESOLUTI~ NO• _~~9~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNYNG CdMMISSION
THAT PETTT.iODI FOR CONDITIGNAL USE PERMIT NO. 3498 BL GRANTED
WHEREA3, the Anaheim Ci.ty Planning Commiaai.on di.d reveive a
verified Petition for Conditional Use Parmit for certain real ~roperty
eituated in th~+ City of Anaheim, Caunty oE Orange, Stato o~ California,
deacribed ae:
PARCF.L 3 OF PARCCL MAP NO. 89-311, I:i THE CITY OF
ANI~HEIM~ COUNTY OF ORJ\NGE~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ A3 PER
MA,P FILED I11 BObK 260 PAGES 1 TO 4 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL
MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF RHE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY.
WIiER~7~S, the City Planninq Commiaeion did hold a public hoaring
at the Civic Center in tho City of Anaheim on April 6, 1992, at 1:30 p.m.,
no~ice of said public hearing having been dull givon ae requirQd by law and in
accordanaF~ with the provieione of tho Anaheim Munictpnl Code, Chaptez 18.03, to
hear and conoider evidence for and againet aaid prnpoeed conditional ueo permit
and to inveetiqate and make find:nga and recommendatione in connectian
therewithj and
WHERF:AS, said Commiesi~n, aftar duQ inepeatl.on, investiqation ar.d
study made by iteelf ana in its behelf, nnd after due conei.doration of all
evidonco and reporta ofEored at eaid hearing, doos~ find and determine the
following £actas
1. ~hat the pro~osed use ia properly one Por which a condi21ona1
uee permit ie authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Gection 18.050.070 to retain
nn automobila repair eervice (auto body ehop) with waiver of. the foll.owing
under authnrity of Code Soction 18.06.080:
,S~,CTIONS 18 06 050 021~ -~,~.imum number ~f oarkina gpacaQ.
~~~050.0222 (8_~ re~~trea; 55 praoQaed)
18.06.050.03i
and 18.61.Ob6,050
2. That the parktng vnriance will not cauoe an increase in
traffi.c congention in the immedinte vicinity nor adveroely affect anf adjoining
land uees=
3. That the granting o£ tho parkis~g variance ~nder the
conditione impoeed will not be detrirnenta.l to thcr peace, health, eafoty or
gene.ral welPare of the citizene of tho City of Anaheimj
4. That tho ~xopoa~ed uao will not advoLeely atfect tho adjoining
lrsnd ueea and the growth and dAVeloFunent of th~e arua in which it is propoeed to
be located~
CR14S7MS -1•• PG92-44
5. That the eize anct ehape of t~e eite for the prcpoeed uoe ie
adequRte to allow the full dovalopment of th~ propoeed use in a manner not
detrimental to th~ particular aroa nor to tha peaco, hea1L•h, eafety, and
general welfarot
6. That the traf£ic generated by ihe propoaed uae will not
impose an undue buXden upon the etreete an3 highwaye deoigned and improved to
carry the trafEic in the are~j
7. That the grantin~ of the aanditional uee permit under thm
conditions impoeed will not be ~etrimental to the peace, he~lth, safety and
generRl welEare of the citizone of the City o£ Anaheimf and
8. That no one ind.icated their preAence at eaid pub~ic hearing
in oppoeitionj and that no corr.espondence waa receivod in oppoeikion to the
eubject• petiti~n.
CALTF~RNIA ENVIRONM~NTAT~ UAT~ITY ACT FINJLNG: That the Anahoim
City Planninq Commiesion has reviewed the pro~oeal to zetain an dutomobilo
repair earvice (auto body ahop) witli wRlver of minimum numbez of parking epaaoe
on a rectangularly ehaped parcol oP land coneieting of apprnximately 1.1 acre
locsted at the southeaat cornor of Anahvim Boulevard and Santa Ana street,
having approximate frontag~s of 150 foet on the eaat si.de of Anaheim Soulevard
and 32U faAt on tho ~outh eido of Snnta Ana Street, and further doecribed ae
500 South Anaheim Houlevardj and doea heroby approvo the NegabivA Declflration
upon finding that the ~oclaration reflocts the independent ~udgement of the
lead agency and thnt it ha~ considered the NogAtive Doclaration together with
any comments received dur~ng the public review proceee and further Findinq ~n
the baAie that tho initial study and any commente received that there ~e no
aubetan•~igl evidence that the prnject will have a eignificant etfect on the
environment.
NOW, THEREEOItE, 9G IT RESOLVFD that the Anaheim City Planning
Commineion doee hereby grant euUject PPtition for Conditional C'oe Permit, upon
the following condi.tiane which are hereby £ound to be a neceseary preroquieite
to the propoeed uee o£ the eu'.~ect pcoperty in order to preeerve the saEety and
general wal.faro of the Citizone uf t2ie City of Anaheim:
1. That subject uae permit shall expire one (1) year Fzom the date o! 1:his
reaolution; provided, however, that time exteneione may bo requoato<3 in
aonnoction with a public hearinq.
2. That ihere ehall bo no outdoor storage of vohiclee or vehicular parts.
3. That the petit3.oner shall i.nstall a epray booth if rocduired by any
regulatory aqency and ehal7. obtain all relutad permitot and that all work
ohall be done within the promieeu.
4. That all dri~veway9 ehall be reconstructed ta accommodata 15 foot radl.us
curb rotuzns in conformance with Engineering Department Standarde.
_Z_ PC92-4b
5.~ That a tr.afiio eignal aeBeoement fee equaling the differonce I~etween the
induetrial and commercial aeseesment feer; ehall be paid to the City of
~naheim in an amount aa eetabliehed by Giky Council. Reeolution~
6.* ^hat plano nhall be eubmitted Co the City Traffic and Tranepartation
Managor for hia review and approval showinq conEormance with the lateet
revioi~n af Enqineering standard Plan Nos. 436 and 602 pertaininq to
parking etandarde and driveway locations. Subject property Ahall
thereupon be developed and maintainad in aonformance with esid plaae.
7. That eubject proporLy ehall be developed eubstnntially in accordanae with
plane and specificatione euLmitked r.o the City oi• Anaheim by the
petitioner and which plane are on file with the Planninq Departmant marlced
Exhibit Noe. 1 and 2.
8. That Conditiun Noe. 3 through 7, above-mentioned, ehall be aomploted
witEiin a perlod of ninety (90) days from the datR o~ thie resolution.
9.* That uppraval of thie applicatio» conetituten approval o£ the propoeed
requeat only tn the extent that it compliea with th~ Anshoim Municipal
Zoning Code end any other applicabl~ City, State and Federal rAgulatione.
Approval doea r.ot include any action or findinqs as tA complianco ar
approval of the requeet regarding any othur applicablo ordinanoe,
regulation or requizement. Conditione marked with an aeteriek (•) are
rmquirod by entabliahed lawe, codea, regulatione and agreementa and are,
therefoso, not eubjec~ to negotiation.
BL~ IT FURTHER RCS~LVED th3t the Analieim City Planning Commiesion
dooe hereby ~ind and determine that• adoption of thie Reeoluti.on !.e expresely
predicated upon applicant's complianae wihh oach and all of the condikione
hnreinabove eet forth. Should any such condition, or any pnrt tihereof, be
doclared lnvalid or unenforcoable by the final judgmant ai any court of ~
competent ~urisdietion, then thie Resolution, and any approvals horein ~
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGAING RESOLUTION wa0 adopted at the P.lanning Commiseion ~
meetinq nf April 6, 1992. ~ ~
C~'"`_.~,,.,,,`- ~~' ~/ , '
CHALRMAN, ANRHEIM G Y PLAt~ NG CO I3SION
ATTESTt
~ ~~~t`-~ru.a>
SECRE AR , ANAHEIM CITX PLAiJNING COMMIS5ION
-3- PC92-44
,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) i
COUNTY OF QRANGE ) o~t.
CITY OF ANAHL~IM )
I, l~iargarita Solorio, Secrc~tary of the Anahai.m City Planning ;,~
Commission, do horeby cortify thst the Eorogning re~Ulut.ion wao paesed and ,
adoptod at a meeting of the Anaheim City P].anning Commienion hold an Apri1 6,
1992, by the following vote of the membera thoreof: ;
AXFSs COMMI34IONERSt HOUAS, BRISTOL, HELLYER~ HLNNTNGLR~ ME83E~ PERAZA
NOE3s COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABS~NTs COMMISSIONERB: ZE@~lEL
~~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, T hava hereunto set m~r hand this ~,L~ day
og ( , 1992.
(/ r
SECRETA , EIM CITY PLANNTNG COMMI83IQN
-a- Pc9z-aa