Resolution-PC 92-45RE50~~UTION NQ PC92-45
A P.ESOLUTION OF TH.~ f#NEIHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOPd
THA.T P~TITION FOR CONDITIUNAI. USE PEKD~IIT NO. 3511 BC GR~1P~ITED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Ci ,ty Planning Commis~ion did receive a verified
Petition for ~Conditinnal Use Permit for certain real property situated in tlic City o£
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, descc•ibed a.s:
FARCEL 13 AS SHOWN OiV A MAP FILED IN BOOK 1G2, PAGcS
27 TO 31 II~ICLUSIV~ UF PARCEL MAPS, iN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDFR OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALYFORNIA.
WY-~EREA~, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hea*ing at thr
Civic Center in the City nf Anaheim on April 6, 1992, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of
the Anaheim Municipal Code, C:hapter 1~.03, to hear and consider evidence far and against
said proposed conditional use Fcrmit and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Com~nission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, an~.1 after due consideration of all evidence and repoi~ts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following £acts:
1. That the pr-~posed use is properly one for which a conditiunll use
permit is authorized by Anaheirr~ iviur.~ci~al ~Code Section 18.61.050.140 tu permit a chutclt
in an existing 21,254••square fo~~t industrial building with waiver of following:
,~ecti~ns 1$46.050.0~~ - .~.imum ny,~nber of ~•~~.rki~ ~,~ces.
18.06.050.026G (~, required; 4~ existing)
1~S16.o~0
.~nd 1~.61 (,~6.OSQ
2. The requeste~l parking waiver was substantiated by a parking study that
was approved by the City Traffic and Transportation Manlger;
3. Th~t the parking variance will not cause an ;ncrease in traffic
congestion in the immediate vic.inity nor adversely affect any udjoining land uses;
4. That the granting of th~ parking variance under the ~onditions imposed
will not be detrimental to the peuce, health, safcty or general welfare of the citizens of the
City of Anaheim;
CR1468MS.wp -1- ~'C92-45
5. That thc proposed use is properly one fur which a conditional use
permit is authorized by thc 7_oning Code, ~r that said use is not listed therein as being a
permitted usc;
b. That the proposed u~e will not aciversely uffect the adjoining land uses
and the growth ancl development ef the area in which it ~~ proposed to be located because
subjGCt prope~ty is located on an industriat strcet away frum the mujor arierial strcets in the
Anlheim Stadium Iiusiness Area;
7. 'fhat subiect reyuest is ap~roved for a period of five (5) years to
determine whether thc church is compatible with surrounding la»d uses;
8. 'That thc sir.c and shape of the site for the proposed use is ade.~uate to
allow the ftill developmcnt of thc proposed us~ in a manner not detrimental to the.
particular are~ nur to the peuce, health, safery, and general welfare;
9. That the trafGc generated hy the propused use will not irnpose an
unduc burden upon the streetc and highways designed and imp:oved to ~any thc traf~c in
thc nrea;
10. That thc granting of thc ccmditional usc pcrmit un.ler the conditions
irnposed will not be detrimental to the peace, healtli, safery and general welfare of the
eitizens ot' the Ciry oE Anaheim; and
1 t. Th~-t no onc indicated their presence :,t :caid public hearing in
oppos+tion; and that no rurresp.~ndencc wa.5 reccived in npposition to the subject petition.
~~I~~VIA ENVI ONy~';VT~.OL1A11TY ACf FIND NG: Tl~at thc
An~heim City F'lanning Cortimission has reviewecl the proposul to pennit a church in an
existing 21,ZS4-square foot industri:.l building witt~ waiver nf minimum number of parking
svaces c~n a rec"angularlyshaped parccl of land cons~sti~g of spproximatcly 0.89 acre, having
a frontage of approximutciy 140 feet on the west side uf Sinclair Street, having a maximum
depth of approximatcly 2'!G fcet, bcing lvcatcd approximacely 41A fcet soutti of the
ccnt~rline of Cerritos Avenue. and furthcr described a.4 1531 Sot!th Sinclair 5ttees; c-nd does
hereby approvc the hcgativc Dcclaratic~n upon firiding that the dcclaration r~flCC14 1MC
indepcndcnt judgement of the lcad agcncy and that it has con.cidcred thc Negntive
Declarati~n together with any commen~s rereived cluring the publi~ review proc:ss ~rnf
f~irthcr finding an thc basis of the initial st~dy anJ any cuinmen~c re~eivcd that therr is no
sulntantial cvidence that the projert will havc a signi~cant cffcrt on thc environment.
NOW, TfIFREfORE, i3~: IT RC5AI.VED that thc An~hcim City ~anning
Commisainn dxs hercby grant subjcct Netition for Conditiungl Use Permit~ upon thc
follnwing conditions which arc herct~y founcl tc~ bc a nrcc~.~.~ry prc~cyuisf~c t~ thc propuscd
uac of the subjcct prdpcrty in ordcr tc~ prescrvc thc safcty anc: gcncra! wclfare <~f the
Citizens of thc C.ity of Anahcim:
.2. PC92-45
l. That siibject use permit shull eapire five (S) yeurs from the c!ate of this resolution;
provided, however, tha~ time extensions may be reyuested in connection with u public
hearing anci, if approvcd,the use may continue for the udditional speci~ed time.
2. • That fire sprinklers shall be installed anci ~ local ~re al~irm system shall be inst~lled
ati required by the Fire Depanment.
3, • That prior to commencement of the activity authorized under ttiis resolution, or prior
to is~uunce of a building permit, or within a pcriod of ni~ety (90) days from the date
of this retiolution, whichever occurs ~rst, the legal owner(s) of subject prouerty shall
execute and record an unsubordinated cuvenant in a form app~oved by the Ciry
Attarney'S Uffice wherein such owner(s) agree not to contest the forniation of any
u5se~sritent district(s) which may hereaft~r be formed pursuant to the provisions of
Dcvelopment agreemcnt No. 83-01 between the City of Anaheim and Anaheim
Stadium Associates, which distract(s) could include such Iebal properry owner's
property. A copy of the recordecl covenant shall then be subrnitted to the Zoning
Division.
q, That any proposed freestanding sign on subject propcrty shall be a monument-typc
not cxceeding eiqht (8) feet in height and shall be subject to the ~eview and ~pproval
of thc Ciry Traffic and Transportation Managcr to deiermine adequate lines-of-sight.
5. That suhject property shall be developed substuntially in accordance with plans and
specifications submitted to the City ot' Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are
on file witt: thr Planning Department marked i:xhibit Nos. 1 through 4.
6, That thc petitioner shall obtain a reciprocal parking agreement for additional off•site
parking during any hours when there 1re large congregations on the subject
prnpeny. Said parking agrecmenc shall be review~d ancl approved by the City'I'rnffic
and 'Cran~portatinn Manager, and the City Attorney. If requircd by the City
Attorncy, said 7~recmci~t shall be rccc~rdcd with thc O~cc of the Orangc County
Recnrder.
7, '1'ha+ thc houn of opcration sf~all bc as fullcnv:
Wurship scrvices: 5unday 8:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
Offi~~: hours: TuesJay thrc~ugh Criday ~~ ecn i2:0A p.m and 6:00 p.~n.
Spccial mcctin~.s: 5aturday
or
Svn~~y Aftcr G:00 p.m..
g, 'il~~t pri~~r tci i~.:u~ncc nf a building pc.rmit or within a pcrioJ of unc (1) yeur from
tt~e datc of this resdlutinr. CanJition No. 6~ ntx~vc•mcntioned, shall be complied
with. Excen.~sions for further timc to cumplete suid cnnditions may bc grnntcd in
accordance with Scction 1R.U3.U90 uf thc ~~nahcim Muni~ipul Code.
.~. pC92•4S
c. lfiut prior to fin<<i building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 2 und 5,
abovc-mentioned, shall be complicd with.
10.' Z'hat approval flf this applica:ion constitutes npproval of the propused request only
to the cxtent that it r.omplies with the Anaheim Municipal Zuning Code 1nd any
other appticable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any
action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other
applicable or linance, rcgulation or requirement. Conditions marked with an ~.Sterisk
(') are required by established laws, codcs, regulations and agreements and arc,
therefore, not subject tn negotiation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planiung Commission
does hereby ~nd and c'.etcrmine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated
upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition~ or any purt thereof, be declared invllid or unenforceable by the
fnal juclgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then t;~is Resolution, und any
approvals herein contained, shai] be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING R ~'I'ION w;~.s aclopted at t~ Planning Commission
meeting of Apri! 6, 1992. '
.~ ,. 1~-- t . c
CHA ;tMAN, ANANEi C[TY P' ~ix. G COMMISSION
AITEST:
, ~~ .
~} ~'1( C/.~~' ' ~ , ; ~ ~/~'~;
SECRETdRY; ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIE'ORNIA )
Cc~UN'1'Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
Cl't'Y Oi~ ANAHEIM )
I, ~targarnu Scloric~, Sccret:iry of the Analicim City Planning rommission, do
hcreby certify that tl~c forcgoing resolution was p~.ased and adupteJ ut a mer,ting of the
Anaheim City Plannin,y, Commission hcld on April ti, 1992, by the following votc of the
m~mbcrs thcreof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: B~JUAS, f3R1S~f0[, I~IEL.LYER, HENNINGER, MESSE,
P1:ttA7A
NOCS: COMMISSIONERS: NUNC
ABSEi~J'i': COMMiSSIONER5: 'LEMCL
IN Wi'INESS WtIEREOF~ 1 havc hcrcunto sct my hancl this _~~~ ciay of
._l.~.. 1~ , 1992. :~ .~ ' ~ ~
i ~ ~ ~; , ,/1 ,)~' 1! ; i. ~i. : i ~.{,/{~ { .
SECRb7'ARY, ANAf~IF~iM CI'CY P[.~,~JiVING ~4MMlSS10N
.a_ ~c~2-as