Resolution-PC 92-54.~o~~otv No. Pc.9 -~a
A RESOL.iJTTUN ()F 'I'HE ANAHCIIvI Cl'TY PL.ANNING COMMISSION
TTiA'I' PETITION FOR CONDITIVNAL USE PERMI'f NO. 3518 BE GItAN'I'ED, IN PART
WHEREAS, the Anuheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petitiun for Conditional Use Yermit for certain rcal property situated in thc City of
Anaheim, County of Urt~nge, St~c~ of Culifornia, ciescribed as:
PARCEL A: PAR~CEL, 2, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILFD I1~I
BOOK 14, PAGE 18 OF YARCEL, MAPS, IN TI-IL OFFIC~ OF
THE COUN'I'Y RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 8: Pf~RCEL 2, AS SHOWN ON A MAI' I'ILED IN i3aOK
23, YAGE : UF PARCL:L MAPS, IN THE OPFICE OF THF.
COUI~1'I'Y RECORDER nF ORANGE COUN'fY, CALIFORNIA.
WI-IERE~-5, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hcaring ut the
Civic Center in the City c~f Anaheim on April 20, 1912, at 1::i0 p.m., noti~e of said public
hearing having been duly given us rzquired by law and in ucco~dance with the provisions
of the Anaheim Municipal ~ode, Cnapter 18.03, to hear and ~onsider eviden~e fur and
against said proposed conditi~~nal use permit and to icrvestigat~ arid make findings ~tnd
recommendations in conr,ection therewith; and
WHEREAS, :~aid Comr.iission, ;-fter due inspection, investigation and study
made by itseif and in its behalf, and ufter due cons~d~ration ~f all evidence and reports
offer~ed at said hearing, does find und determir.c the following fact~:
1. Tt~at the proposed use is properly one for ~~hich a conditional use
E~crmit is authoriicd by Aaahcim Municipal Codc S~:ctions 18.G1.050.070 and 18.G1.OSO.S03
to permit a truck yard a.nd tenninal with outdoc~r tnicN maiuten~-nce and repair services,
and witli wlivcr of th~ fQllc~wing:
(a) .~~ON 18.61.025.020 - Permi~ted ot-~Joor uscs.
(All uscs to be cnndurtcd wholly within •s
building; outdoor tn~c.k maintenance and repair
pfUpUSC[I~
(b) SEC'TION 18.ti~~ - R~U~~~ cnclos~re pf outdoc r~ uses•
(Alf outda~r uses to bc scrcencd by u solid
masonry or slattcd chainlink fen~t, ~iurtial
scteened chairJink proposed)
CR 1479M5.wP -1- PC92-54
2. '1'hat ~vaiver (b) is hereby deriied on the basis that no hardship wzs
identified by th~ petitinner to justify waiver of the required enclosure and screening of
outdoor use~, or encroachment of such enclosure into the requiretl landscape setback, and
that the granting of such waiver would be gra~iting a special privilege and that the
petitioner withdrew said waiver;
3. That there are s~ecial circumstances applicabl~ to the property such
:is size, sbape, t~pography, location or surroundings, which do not apply t~ other identic~-Ily
zoned properties in the vicinity;
4. That strict application of the Zonin~ CadP deprives the property of
privileges ~enjnyed by other properties under identi~al zoning classi~cation in the vicinity;
S, Thut t~e pro~osed use is prnperiy one for which z conditional use
permit is authorizzd by the Zoning Code;
6. That the proposed use, as grante~J, will not adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth and deveiopmciit of the ~area in which it is proposed to
be locuted because !he outdoor uses in connection with waiver (a) will be fully screened
from view;
7. That che sizc ~nd shape of the site for tlie proposed use, us graiited,
is adequate to alic~w 4he full developmeni of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental
to the particular :~rea nor tu the pcace, health, safety, and gener~l welfare;
8. Tliut the traf~c generated by the proposed uss, ns granted, will not
impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways ciesi~ne~l and improved to carry the
traffic in the area;
9. That the granting of the conditional use permit under tl~e conditions
imposed will not be detrimentul to the peuce, healtt~, safery nnd ~eneral welt'are of the
citizens of the Ciry of Anaheim; and
ld. That one (1) person indicated his presence at said public hearing in
opposition; ~nd that correspondence was r~ceived in upposition to the subject petition.
CA _iFORNI ENV[RONMENCAL OUAL,ITY tiCT PYNDING: That the
Anaheim City Planning Comrnission has review~d the proposal to permit a truck yarc~ and
terminal with outdoor truck maintenance and *epair serviccs, and with waivers of permitt~d
outdoor uses and i•cquired enclosurc of outdoor uscs on a rectangulariy-shaped parcel ~f
land consisting of :~pproximately 2.75 ~cres, having a fr~ntage of approximately 310 feet on
the north side of Romncya Drive, having a maximum depth of approximately 388 ie~t,
being IoCatcd approximately 335 fect west of thc centcrline of I.emon Strcet, and f~ i~thcr
described as 303 - 305 West Romncya Drivc; and docs hereby approve the Ne3ative
_~. °c'92-54
D~clacation up~n finding that the declaration reflects f}ie independent juclgement of the
lead agency and thut it has considered the Negativc Dcclaration togethe: with any
comments received during the, public review pro:ess and ~'urther finding on the basis of the
±nitial study and any comment~ received that tt~ere is na substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect on the environment.
1VO~N, THEREFORE, BE [T IZESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Yetition for Conditiona: Use Permit, in part, upon
thc following conditions which ar~ hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
propose~ use of the subject property in order to prescrve the safety and general welfare
of the Citizens of the Ciry of A.naheim:
1. That two (2) of the driveways shall be reconstructed with fifteen (15) foot radius
curb returns and the third ~Jriveway shall be closed, as required by the City Enginee~
in conformincc with Engineering Department Standards.
1. Th~t an on-site trash truck turn around are~ shall be provided in accordance with
En~ineering Standard Detail No. G1U as requireci by the Department of
Maintenance.
3. That any building iised For truck repair shall be equipped with fire sprinklers, ~
required by the Fire Department.
4. That a Flan Shest for solid wastc stor~ge and collection, and u plan for recycling
shall be submitt~ed to fhe Department of Maintenance for review and approval.
5. Tt~at suhject property shall be developed substa~tialiy in accordance with pluns and
speci~cations submitted to the ~ity of Aaaheim by the petitioner and which plans
are on ~lc with the Planning Department markeci Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2; provided,
however, that:
(a) The chainlink fences along the east and west property lines shall be
interwoven with wooden slats, and that any broken slats shall be repllced;
(b) Th~t the site enclosing fences shull be a minimum six (6) feet high; und
(c) That the depth of the IandscaFed setback ~long Romneya Driv~ shall be the
same as currently exists on the adjacent prope:ty t~ the we.st.
6. That pri4r to commencement of the activity authorized hy thic resolution or within
a period of one (1) ycar fr~m the date of this resolutic~n, wnichever occurs ~rst,
Condition I`Ios. 1, 2 aad 4~ above-ment:oned, sfiall bc complicd with. Extensions for
further tinic to complcte said cor.diEio~u may be ~ranted in accordance with Section
1$.03.U90 of thc Anaheim htunicipa' Code.
-3- PC92-54
7. That priar to fin~l building and zoning inspections, Cc~ndition Nos. 3 and 5,
~bov~-mentioned, sl~all be complied wiih.
Th~,t within a period of ninety (9U) days after i~suance of an occupancy permit, the
un~aved dirt area shall be fully paved.
9. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request orily
to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim ~.~lunicipal Zoning Code and any
othr;r applicable City, State ar-d Federal regiilations. Approval does not include any
~ction or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regardir~g any other
applicaUle ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE I'f rtJRT~ICR RESOLVF.U that the Maheim City Plannirig Conunission
does hereby ~nd and determine tl~at adoption of this Resolution is expressl~ predicated
upon applicant's compl.iance with each and all of the canditions hereinabove set £orth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforce~ble by the
final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, !hen this Resalution, and any
approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and voicl.
THE FO1tEGOING RE50LUTI~N was adopied at the Planning
Commission meeting of April 20, 1992. ~ ' i> ~
: ~~.-"_--~ ~'~ .
CEIAIRMA , ANAHEIM CI'I'Y P NIN<< COMMISSInN
ATTEST:
`y .~ ~_~iur~
SECRFT RY, AI-IEIM CITY PLAriNINC; COM~ISSION
STATE OF CALTFORNIA. )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
C'1TY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margurita Solorio, Secretary of the P.naheim Ciry P1lnning Commission, do
hereby certify that the faregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
Anaheim Cicy Planning Commission held on April 2Q, 1992, by thc following vote of the
membcrs thar.eof:
AYES: COMMISSIONCRS: BRIS'1 AL, HELLY~R, MBSSE, PFRAZA, ZBMBL
N~ES: COMMIS5tONERS: NONE
AF5EN'C: CUMMISSIONEI~ ;: BOUAS, HEHNING~kt
IN WITNESS WI~EEREnF~ I havs hereunto sst my hand this ~~~ day of
~ ~ ~, 1992. `~ ~Z .fu.~-~QJ _;~OICI~
~-,
SEC!+ ~ET RY NAH~IM CI'fY PLANNING COMMISSION
.4_ PC9:'-54