Resolution-PC 92-71,~,w,r,
RESOLUTION NO,~pC92-7~,
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM ClTY PIANNING COMMIS~IAN
THAT PEfiTION ~OR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 91-9~~18 BE GRANT~D
WIiEREAS, the Anahefm City Planning Commission did receivo a vorified
petiticn for Reclassification f~r real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, 5tate of California, described as follo~~rs:
THE SOUTN 15A.00 FEEr OF 1'HE WEST 343.00 FEEf OF THE NORTHWEST
~UAR7ER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER UF
SECTION 14, 70WNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANCH 11 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS
COYOTES, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, t;QUNTY OF ORANGE, S7A7E OF
CALI~ORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 11, OF
MISCEUANEVUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RE~Oi~DER OF SAIa
ORANGE COUNTY.
WWEREA3, the City Planninc~ Commission did hald a public hearing at the
Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on ~Aarch 23, 1992 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
h~arin~ having been duly given as required by law and in accordanc~ with the provisians
of tho Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and
against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make find(ngs and
recommendations in connection ther~with; and that said public hearing was continued
to the April 20, N1ay 18, and June 15, 1992 Plannfng Commission meetings; and
WMEREAS, said Commission, after cJue inspection, investigation and study
made by itself an~i in its behalf, and after dua consideration af all evidence and r~eparts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitionor proposos reclassification of subject property from
the RS-A-43,OOJ (Residential/Agricultural) Zane ta the RM-2400 (Resident~a~, Multiple-
Family) or loss intense zone.
2. That the Anaheim Ganeral Plan designatos subject property for Low
Medium Donsity Resider~tial land uses.
3. That subject reclassification is in conformance ~vith the City's General
Plan.
4. That the proposeri reclassification of subject proporty is r~acessary
and/~r desirable for the orderly and proper development af the community.
CR1517MS.wp -1- PC92-71
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject propeNy does properly
relate to the zones and their permitt9d use~ locally establishod in close p:oximity to
subject proparty and to the zones and thoir permittad uses generally established
throughout the community.
6. That eleven (11) peo~le in apposition and six (6) people in favor
indicated their pre~ence at said public h~aring; and t';dt no corrsspondence was received
in oppositio-~ to subject aetition.
~gLIFORNI,~ENVIH NME~lTAL~UALITYAC F~NDING: TtiartheAnaheim
City Plr~nning Commissior~ ha5 reviewed the proposal to raclassity subJact property nom
tho 7S-A-4~,000 (posidential/Agricialtural) Zone to the RM-2~lOG (Residential, M~~Itiple-
Family) to permit an 18-unit (previously 19-unit) condomin~um complex with waivers of
maximum struc~ural t ieight, minEmum landscaped setback adjacent to single-family
re~idential zane, maximum sitP coverage and required prrvate street improvement on a
rectangularly-sha~od parcel of land consisting of app; oximately 1.08 aCre~ having A
frontage o~` approximately 160 teet on the e~st side of Knott Stroet, having a maximum
depth of approximately 290 feet, being located approximately 350 feet south af the
centerline of Rome Avonue and further described as 342 South Knott Streot; and doos
hereby approve the Negative Deciaration upon rnding that tho declaration reflects the
independent Judgement at the le~d agency and that it has considered the Negative
Declaration together with eny comments receive~i during the public r~view process and
furtt~er finding an the b~sis af the fnitial study and any comments ~ec9ived that there is
no substar-tial evidence that the projecc will have a signiticant eHect on the snvironment.
NOW, THEREFURE, BF IT RESOWED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby approve the subject Petition ior Reclassification to authorize an
amendmeM ta the Zoning Ma~ cN the .Anaheim Municipal Code to exclude the
above•d~scribed property from the RS-A-43,U00 (Residential/Agria~ltura!) 7.one and to
incorpor~te said described property into the R~A-2400 (Residerttial, Multipie-Feimily) zone
upon the tollowing conditions whir,h are hereby faund tn t~e a necessary prereq~isite tr~
the propcised uss ~i ~ubjoct property in order to preserve the safety Pr-d geReral weltare
of the Citizens af the C~ty hf Anaheim:
1. That an uns~'wrdinated covenant shatl be recorded witl ~ the Office of the Oranfle
Counry R~corder agreeing to pravide the buyer of each condominium clwelting unit
with writt~n info~~rnation obtainetf hom the schc~ol dist~Ect(s) pertainin~ to passible
~vercrowded ~'onditions and busing 3tatus ot the schc~o~(s) serving the dN-elling
unit. !, copy of the covenant shalf be subm~tted to and approved by the City
Attomey pricr to rocordatfon. A copy of the recnrded c;c~venent shalt bv submitted
to bhe Zoning Division.
2, That ~rior to placwment ot en ordinance rezoninfl subiect prapeRy on an a~enda
tor ~it~r Council ccnsics~ration, Condition No. t, abo-e•rnentioned, sheli be
c~omp~eted. The ~ity Council may ~ppr~ve or disapprc~ve a zoning ordinancs ~t
its discretion. If tne ordinance is disap~+raved, thb pro~edure s9t forth in Mah~im
.~. pC92-71
r' ,
Municipal Code Section 18.03.085 shall apply. The provisions or rights granted by
this resulut~on shall become nul! and void by action of tho Planning Commission
unless said conditions are complied with within one (1) year from the date of this
resol~~tion, or such ~fu~thar timo as the Planning Commission may flrant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City ~lanning Cor~mission
does hereby flnd and determine that adoption of th!s Resolution (s expressly predicated
upon applicant's compliance with ~ach and all of the conditions hereinabove set iorth.
Should ~ny such conditions, or any part thereof, be cleclared invelid or unenbrceable by
the final Judgment of any cuur; of competent Jurisdiction, th~n this Resolution, and any
approvals horein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
DE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this re3olution shall n~t constitute a
rez~ninfl af, or a commitment by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such
razoning shall require an ordinance of the City Council which sfiell be a 19gislative act
which may be approved or denied by the Ciry Council at it~ sole discretion.
THE FORk"GUING i~ESOLUTION was adopted qi the Planning Commission
meeting of June 15, 1992. ~'' ~ ;,~
_.._, ~. ~~~ _ ~
~Wl~(FlMAN, ANAFiEI CI PLA ING CO !SSION
ATfEBT:
~ ~
~~ ' l ?/i~f.~. c~r.it'b't.iG~
SECRET~4RY, ANAHCIM CI7Y PLANNINC COMMISSION
STATE OF CAU~ORNIA )
COUN'T'Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Marg~rite Solor{o, 8ecretAry of the Anaheim Ci:y Planning Commission, do
her~try cortify that the i~regoing resol~tion Y~as passed end adoptod at a meoting cf tne
Anaheim City Planni~g c'~ommission b~eld on June 1~, 1992, by the tollowing voto of the
members thereaf:
AYES: CAM~NISSIQNERS: BOUAS, BRI.~,TOL, HELt.YER, H~NMIN(3ER, M~S3E
ZEMEL
NOES: CQMMISSIONEFiS: NONF
ABSENT: COAAMISSlONEFiS: PERAZA
IN WI'fNES5 WHEREOF, i heve hereunto set my hand this ~y~' dey o(
~ 1~~1c~ ''G ---' 1992.
~- '_~ -~~~ _,~ititt.:~i,.'
SECRETARY, A, NEIM CITY PLANNINt3 COMMISSION
-3- PCH2•71