Resolution-PC 92-87RESOLUTIGN N0. PC92-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PIANNING COMMIS510N
THAT PEfITION FOR RECLASSIFICA'fION NU, 91-92•20 6E DFNIEQ
WHEREAS, the An~holm City Plnnning Commission did receive a verified petitlon tor
Reclassliication for certAln real property situatod in the City of Anaheim, Counry of Oranflo, State of
Calfiornia, described as follows:
PARCEL 1 OF PARGEL MAP 89-382 AS FILED IN BOOK 258, PAGE 31 OF
PARCEL MAPS QF SAID COUNTY.
WH~REAS, the Ciry Plann(ng Commission did huld e public hearin~ at the Clvic Conter
in the Ciry of Anaheim on May •4, 1992 at 1;30 p.m., notice of saki public hearing having been duly given
as requlred by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Ant+heim Munlcipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider e~~idence tur and against snid proposed reclasali(catlar and to Investigete and make
iindings end recommendations In connaction thorewith; end that saki public hearing wes continued to tlie
May 18, Juno 15, July 13 and July 27, 1l~J2 Planning Commisslon meetfngs; and
WHEREA3, saki Commission, atter due Inspoction, lnvestigatian and study msde by Itsel~
and in fts behalf, and aftAr due consfder~tion oi all evidence and reports oHered at said hoaring, does find
and determine the (ollowing tacts:
1. That the petftioner proposec to raclassify a portlon o} subject property (rom the
R3-A•43,000(SC) (Res(dential/Agric.ultural-Scenic Corridor Overlay) Zona to the RS :~000(SC) (Residentlal,
Singlo-FamilyScenic Corridor Overlay) Zone;
2. That the AnahRim Gen9~ai Plan deslgnates subJoct pmperty tor HIIIsIde Low DensRy
Residential ~and uses permitting up to 5 dwelling units per acre;
3. That the proposed reclas-stiicat~on of subJect properry is not necessary nor
desirebfe for the orderly and proper deve:opment af the commun(ty;
4. 7hat the prop~sed reclassllfcatfon of subJect property does not prope~ly relnte to
the zanes arxl their permitted uses iocally esta~lished in c'ose proximity to subject property and to ihe
zones arx+ the(r permittod usos genorally ostabllshed through~ut the community;
6. That twenty (20) people indicated thelr pr~sance at satd publlc haa~ing In
opposKiors; and that a pE+tftion cAnteining epproximately one hundrecl end iwenty (120) slpnatures was
recalvecl in oppoahlon to eub~ect petlt~on.
rei iFORNlA [NVIRQN NTA - QUALITY AC~DI~i: Thet tne Anaheim Cfty Planning
Commission ~~ae roviewed the proposal to ro~fassity a portlort of the subJect property from the
RS•A-43,000(SC) (Hestdential/Agrfculturel-Sconlc Corridor Overlay) Zona to tho RS•5000(SC) (Residentfat,
Sinple•FamilySr,en~c Corridor Ovbrlay) Zone to establfsh a 36-lot, sinple tamily residantial subdblsfon with
walvers ot r~qu(r9c! lot trontage, end raquirod locati~n and orientation of buildtngs, and to ramove 51
healthy specimon trees on an Irrepularly shapod parcel of taixl consistfng of approxlmately 12.38 acres,
hoving approacimate iront~~es of 710 feat on the soeith sfde of Santa Ana Canyon Roed and 240 ieot on
the north akie of Avenida Maryarita, having a moximum deptt~ of approx(matoty 700 loot, beinq (oceted
approxlmate~y t,211 feat aast oi the ceMe~line of aoyal Oak Road nnd further clescribed as 5540 East
Santa Ana r.a~nyon
CR1562MS.wp .i. PC92-87
Road; and does hereby appr~ve a mitl~Ated Negetivo Declarntion on the basls that the declaratlon re8octs
the Independent Judflement ol tho lead agoncy and that the Planning Commisslon has consldered tho
proposal with the mltlgatod Negotfve Deciaretion, togather with any commonts recelveci during the public
review process and (urther finding, on the basls of the Inhlal Study, th~t there is no substentlul evidenco
that the proJoct wlll have n significtant effoct on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BC 17 RESQl.VEO that the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon does
heroby deny Potition for Reclassl(Ic~tion on the basis of tha al~rementloned ilndfngs. ,
THE FOREGOING RGSOLU710N was adopted at the Planninfl Commis3lan meeting of
July 27, t~J2. /~
~r"~ G~" - ~-- .
~-GF IRMAN, ANAHE~M C~ PLANN OMMISSION
ATTEST:
.CREI'ARY, A a ~lM CI~P~LANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CAUFQRNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s3.
CIIY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Janet L. Jensen, Secretary of tho Anaheim Ciiy Planning Commisslon, do hereby certify
that the toregoiny resolutfon was passed and adoptud at a meotinq of the Anahelm Clty Planning
Commisslon held on July 27, 1992, by tho followlnp vote of the memhora thereoi:
AYES: COMNIISSIONEFiS: 60UAS, BRISTOL, IIENNINGFR, PERAZA, ZEMEL
N~ES: GOMMISSIONERS: HELLYER
ABSEM: COMMISSIONERS: MESSF
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havct hereunto set my hand this 7~1~ day ot
/J~~~~~, 1992.
••- V
~-~~ ..~.L.--
~~ 'RETARY, ANAHl31 CiTY PLANNING COMMISSION
t
-2- res2-a~