Resolution-PC 93-18~ ~
,~~SOLUTIQ~ N0. PC93-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAWEIFA CIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MUDIFYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2809
WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit No. 2809 to permit a 2 and 3-story,125-u~~it aonlor cltizens
~partment complex wilh walvers ot (a) minimum structura~ setbeck, (b) requited building Iocotion, (c)
requlred recreation-I~isure area, (d) requlred site boundary screaninp, and (e) requlrad number of offordable
units) was approvetl, in part, by the Pianning Commissfon under Resolutlon No. PC86-189 on July 21, 1986,
perrr~lttinp 118 unita and denying ail waivers on property located on tho nor~h side of Nohl 9anch Road
betweon Hlllcrest Stroet on the west and Anahelm Hills Road un tha east, and further desorlbed as 435
South Anehelrt~ Hills ~foad; and
WWEREAB, the proposal was cons(dered hy the Planning Commisslon at three publlc meetings:
June 9, June 23, and July 21, 19A6; and
WHEREAS, according to the minutes of the me~tings, landscaping of the ap~roximateiy 1 acre
westorly porNon of sub~ect proporty was dfscussed at two of the meettngs, as follows:
(a) P,t the June 9, 1fl6E Planning Commisslon meeting, "Molvin Wunt, 273 S. Illllcrest, stated he agrees
with the opposltion rep~rdlnfl tho hlgh density. He r9fened to the area along Nohl Ranch Raad
bordered by Hlllcrest Street on the west and Anahelm Hllls Road on the east and stated that is a
weed•iilled, dry, uncared•tor strip of land which fs really an eys sore and a hozard to pedastrlans with
weeds growtng over the sidewalks, etc. He askad that if approved, the Qommissfon should include
a requirement to maintatn a landscaped greenbelt elong the Nohl Ranch Road portlon, in koeptng with
the standards ofAnaheim HIIIs...Mr. Ryan (eger~t) stated thoywould be happyto provtdethegreenbQlt
as auggasted "
(b) At tho July 21,1906 Plenning Commisslon meeting, "Commissloner Herbat asked if the slopo abutting
Hlllorest will be I~ndscapeci and malnta(nod permaneniiy. Mr. Schwartze (statod) that all the area
fnctuding the flet ~lateau wlll be landacaped. We stated there Ia t/2-acre Iandlockod parcel whtch they
are attempttng to acqufre whlch wlll also be landscaped."
WHEREAB, Resolutfon No. PC86-189 fnadvertently d!d,p,Qi contain e aonditlon requirinp said
area be landscaped as dlscussed during the public hearfng, and neither does tho approved sfte plan exhibit
show sald area; a.nd
WHEREAS, on November 16, 1992, the Plann(ng Commisslon consldered as a fioports and
Recomm9ndatlon Item, a request by Alan Trider for an interpretatlan of landscaplnp requtremdnfa pursuant
to Conditlonal Use Pormit No. 2809; and the Planning Commtsslon telt It app~opriate for the doveloper to
landscape and in(gate eU that area loceted along Nohl Ranch Road bordered by Hilicrest St: eet on the west
and Anaholm Hills Road on the eaFt, Including the slope and flat plateau abutting Hillcrest Streeh and
WHEREA3, the petftloner does not want ta landscape the approxfmate one (t ) acro area locatod
on the north~~a~t side of Nohl Ranch Road between Hlllcrsst Street and Anehelm Hills Road and requests
further negotlatlon of stipulatfo~s made by the original petitloner (Anshefm Hllis Aecgust Club) at the
Planning Cemmisslon meetings of June 9, 1986, and Juty 2t, 1986; and
WHEREA3, petkioner has (ndfcated the tollowing reasons and justlflcation far eliminating the
requfrement for landacaping the aroa: (
t. That the approved and stampad landscap~ng plans describe a temporary irrigatlon syatem ~
with spsciffc hydroseed materlal; i
CR 1731 MS.wp -1. PCJ3•18 ~
i
~
~. ,~~~r
~~.
. ~"''t
1. That Resdutlon No. PC86•189 does ~.Qt contain a condftlon requlrtng sald erea be
landscaped; and
3. That this Is e Cfty bond project which ^.annot eHord any addittonal expendhures not
specllied In thelr requtrementa.
WHEREA3, the Ciry Plannin~ Comrt~~ssion did hold a public hea~in~ et the Civic Center In tha
Cfty ot Anaholm on February 8, 1993, at t:30 p.m., notfce of sai~ pubtic hearinp havtnp bAen duly ~Nen
as raqutred by law and in accordence with thA provtslons ot the Anahaim Munlclpel Code, Chapter 18.0.'~,
to hear and conaider ~Je-~co for end apalnst sakf proposRd amendmont and to tmestlpata and make
flndtnys and recommendatlo~ : In connectlon therewtth; and
WrIEREA3, oaid Commiaalon, aker due Inapectlon, trnestipatlon end study mede by Its~lf and
in fta ~,ehalf, sr~ aRer due conside~etion of nll widenca and reports oNerod at sald hoarlnp, dops Md and
detsrmine the idlowin~ lects:
1. That tha mtnutea ot the June and July 1988 puWic meetinps Indicate it was the
appllcaM's stlpWated intentlon, as well es the Commisalan's and nelphbors' expectatton, that the aree In
question bo ~andacaped.
2. Thnt three Hillcrest 3treet homeowners testiflad a2 th0 FAbruary 8, 19~1 public maotinp
(n favar of the eub~ect arqa belrp landaceped end m&tntainod in connection w~th tha eenlar citizena'
apartrr~nt compisx.
3. That approval ot Condltlo~l Use Permit No. 2809, and arry stlputetlons rtmdo thonlo,
are euxl8ted whh the sub~ect property end not with the o~fylnal cwner/eppllcarK at the Ume M epprwal:
and, theroloro, h Is tl~e currem property ownero reoponstblllty to Instell and rt-alntaM the tendscaplnp.
4. That the proposod uae, as orlqfnally approvad arw! baaod on otlputMbna mndo et tho
pubilc hsa~lnp, would not edversoly aHect the adJointnp land us~a and Ihe praMh and devNopmont o~ the
areo In which R Is propo~ad to be Ic+cated; end that the sfze and :hapa of the aho tor the proposAd uso
Is edaqueta to etlcw tf re tull davotopmont ot tho propoa~d uso tn a mennor not dot~lmont~l to N~c Darllculer
anM nor to tha poeco, health, eafety end yeneret wellaro N th~ property is devAlopod a~ a:~ ~~'ed to et
the puWic hea~inp; but thot tho pertnh ~rnM~f Is beinp exorcfsod cornrary to the tortn~ or c-~~d~bne oi
~uch approval b~causo the atlp~latiorss madt at tt~ publi~ f~aertnp re9ardinp land~capnp d tho watody
poRk~ st~Minp Hilcrost Stroet hnvo not, to data. boon adhorod to.
b. Thet tM use for whlch the approvel ~vas prantod Mu not boon complatoly ~cordiad.
to deto.
6. Th9t throo C~) P~P~o Indk~IOd tMlr p-6sonoA at feld public h~e~irp In oppo~ltlon to tho
req~QSt; and that no cor~apcndm~ce was rtc~MMd In opposhtat to tho tub~oct nqu~st.
~FOANIA ENVIROHMENTAL OUALlYY ACT' FIN INQ: Thnt tho Aneholm Chy Pla~n~np
Commisslon nsa rovlew~d tho propo~el to mall(y or em~nd condttbn~ of epprovs~ ond/or stlpulatlau
pMalninp W lendtqpo ncN~~MS and doos horoby lind that tha Nopatlw D~cloratfon prevYtosnly
apprav~d in connoction wltlt Cond~lonal Ua P~rr~h No. 280~ I~ sd~quat~ to sorw as tho roqulnd
onvironmentd da~timcrKathn In oonnoction wAh tMs requost.
``°--
.2. P08~•18
~ ~
NOW, THEREF ~HE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim ~ity Fsenninq Commieslon doos
hereby m~dity CondRional U4e PermR by addinp the fotlowi~y new condhlo~~g:
t. 7hat prlor to final bufldinD end zoninq inapections tar subJect senior citizens' apartmont complex, the
erea located alonp the north aide oi Nohl Rench Roed between Hnlcrest Street and Anaheim Hpls
Fload ahall be hydroseeded and e pormenent IRIQntton aystem ahell be Instelied. Addltlonalty, twenty
(20) 15~ailon treeg ahall bo planted In thls aree and that e;l larxlsrapinp shall be permanoMly
maiMalned.
2. ?hat the apacllic landscape and Irrlpation plans for the subj'ct araa etonQ Hilicreat Street ahell be
aubmitted to tho Zoninfl Division for revfe~v and approval p or to Instatlatlo .
THE FOREd01N(3 RESOLUTION waa edo the ptan Commisalon maettnp ot
Febtuary e, 19413. ' ~ •
ATTEST:
SECRET Y, AHEIM CITY PUANNINQ COMMISSION
3TAYE OF CAUFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANQE ) ea.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
1, Marqarite~e 8dmlo, Socr~tsry cf the Armh~im G'ty Plannlnp C~nmisslon, do h~xoby cMHy
thnt the fora~olnp readutbn wa~ pasaod end adoptod at a mestlnp of the Pnah~Im Chy Plsnnln0
Commiselon haW on February 8, t993, by tho ldlowln~ voto of the membors thor~ot:
AYE$: COMMI8SIONEA3: 80YDSTUN, CALDWELL. HENNINdER, MAYER, ME59E. PERI1Z/1, TAIT
NOES: CAMMI3310NER3: NONE
N38ENT: COMMI$SIONERS: NONE
IN WITNE3S WHEP.EOF, t have hareuMO ~ot my hend thlt !J~ daY of
, 1~'D3.
gE ANAHEIM CITY P~ ANMNCi COMM18SION
Mr
t~,
~. p(~-18