Resolution-PC 93-43~' ~
A AESO! .UTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3617 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, tha Anahelm City Planning Commisslon did receive a ver(fled Petitl~n for
Conditlonal Use Permit for certain roal properry sitc:ated in the City of Anaholm, County oF Orange, State
of Calitornia, described as:
PARCEI ?., AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BpOK 92, PAGE 4 OF PAI~CEL
MAPS. IN THc OFFICE OF THE COUPJTY RECORDER OF ORANCiE COUNTY,
CAUFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the Ciry Plsnning Commisslon dld hold s publEc haaring at the Clvic Center
in the City of Anahoim on April 5, 1993 at 1:30 p.m., notfce of sald publfc hearing h~ving been duly glvon
as required by law and fn accordance with the provfsions of the Anahelm Municipal Code, ChaptQr 18.03,
to hear And consider ev(dence ior and against said proposed condltional use permit and to Investigate and
make flndfngs and recornmendat(ons in cannection therewith; and
WHEREAS, 3aid Commisslon, after due inspectfon, Investiga:lon and study made by itsolf
and in Its behalt, and After due considoratlon oF atl evidence and reporta oHered at sald hearlnp, does find
and determino the tollowing tacts:
1. That tha propasod use is prope~ly one i~r whlch a conditlanal use permit is authori2ed by
Anahefm Munfcipal Code Soctlon 18.61.050,601 to permit the sale, Installation end aervicing of automotive
alr conditioning, crufse control and power window/door lack eystems; and that subjer.t facillty is primarily
a wholesale ousfness mainly servfng IocAI ~utomoblle dealerRhfps and, theretore, generates very 1(ttle retail
ACIIVIty;
2. That the proposed use will not adveraety aHect t{~e adjofning Isnd uses and the growti; end
development of the area In which it is propoood to bo 'ocated because no constructlun to expand ihe
existing iloor area Is p~~posed and the use (s simllar to, end compatible with, surrounding lend uses ln
the Immodiato vicinity;
3. That the s(ze and shepo of the site for the proposod use Is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use In a manner not detrfinental to the particular area nor to the peace,
heeith, ~afety, end Qenerel weiiere;
a. That the trattic generated by tho proposed use wiil not Impose an undue burden upon the
stroets ~nd highwavs designed and fmproved to carry tf:e traitic in the area;
5. That tl~e granting of the conditional uee permit under the conditions imposed will not be
detrimental to the peace, heelth, safety and goner~i woifare of the citfzens oi the Cfty of Anahelm; and
6. That no one fnd(cated their presence at safd publlc hearing fn oppositi~ and that no
correspondence was recelvad in oppositlon to the subJect petitlon.
~,,*
,~~
CR 1774MS.wp •1- PC93-~3
~'~" (''°',
CALI~O$NIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT FINDIN(3: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commfssion has reviewed the proposal to perm(t the sale, Installati~~n and Rervfcing of automotive sir
condltioning, crufse control and power window/cioor lock systems on a:rectan~ularlysh~aped parcel 03 land
consisting of approximetely 0.88 acre having 9 frontage of approximatoly 170 teet cn tha west aide of
KrAemar Boulevard, havlnQ a maximum depth a~ approximately 220 teet, being located approximately 530
feet south of the centerfine of Coronado Street, and further described as 1141 North 1<raemer Boulevard;
and does hereby approve the Negatlve Declaration upon ilnding th~t the declaration reflects the
indopendent Judgement of the Iead agency and that ft has considered the Negative Decleration together
with any comments recoived during the pubiic review procesa and iurther finding on ~:he basis of the initial
study and any comments rocefved that there is no substantiai evldence that thr~ proJect wlll have a
~Igniticant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVHQ that tha Anaheim Ciry Planning Cornmission does
hereby grant subJect Petition for Conditlonal Use Permit, upon the following conditions whfch are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequlsite to the proposed use of the cubject property'~n order to preseNO the
safesy and general welfare of the Citizens of th~ City ot Anaheim:
1. That subJect petition is granted for a period oE ilve (5) years frnryi the date ol t{iis resolution untll Aprll
5, 1998; provided, however, that the patitlon;~r mfly request t!~ro extenslo!~s or deletion of the time
Iimitatlon fn conjunctlon with a public hearfng.
2. That a traftic signal assessment tee equaiing tha ditference between the industrlal and commErcial
assessment fees ah~ll be paid to the Cfty of Ane.heim In an smount as establiahod by City Councll.
3. That plans shall be submftted to the City TraHic and Trsnaportatlon IJlen;., ~r (or his revlew and
approval ohowing contormance with the current vorslons of En~ineering Standard Pl~n Noe. 438 and
602 pertalniny~ to parking standards and drlvewAy location. SubJoct properry shall thereupon be
developed and maintalned ~n coniormence with said plans.
4. That subJect property shall be devetoped substantfally in accordency with plans and specltlcati~ns
submittod to the City of Anahefm by the patitioner and which plans are on tlle with the Planning
Deaartment marked Exhfbit Nos, 1 through 3.
5. That ell sa:es, instollation and servicing shell be conducted wholly tnsida the b~~lldin~.
5 That prfor to commencement ot the actlvfty herein epprovnd or wltfdn a perfod ot thirty (30) days from
th9 date of this resolutlon, whichever occurs ilrat, Condltion Nos. 2, 3 and 4, abova-rrientfoned, shell
be completed.
7. That approval of thls applfcatio~ constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that
it complies with the Analielm Munlcipat Zoning Code and any othor appllcable City, 3tdte and Federal
regulations. Approval does not inoluds any action ar flndingii ~s to campliance or approval of th9
request regarding any othor appllcabi~ ordinance, regulatlon or requlrement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOl.VED that the Anaheim Clry Planning Commisslor. ,,oes heroby ifnd
and determfne that adoption of thfs Resolutt~n fs expressly praifcatecl upon applicant's complience with
each and all of the cenditlons herelnabove set forth. Should any such condit(on, or eny part tharoof, be
declared inva~id or uneniorceable by the final judgment of any couK ol competent jurfsdlctlon, then thls
Resolutlon, and any appmvals hereln contained, shall be deemed null and vofd.
.2. PC93~43
~
~
THE FOREGOINQ RESOLlJTION was adopt aJ~i4h~lanr~'~g Commisalon meeting of
April 5, 1993. f ~ •
A'f'1'EST:
o~ ~
SEC ARY, ANAHEIM CITY ~IANNI'~~G COMMIS51n~1
ANAHEIM CITY PIAN
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
CQUNTY OF ORANQE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
t, Edith L Harris, ~~~cretary of the AnAheim City Pinnoing Commisslon, do hereby cortify
that the ioregoi~g rasolution was passed and adopted at a meell~p of the Anaheiin City Planning
Commissfon held un Aprll 5, 1993, by the follo~ving vote of the mombbrs thereof:
AYES: CQMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUN, CALDWELL, HENNINGER, MAYER, M,'SSE, PERAZR, TAIT
NOES: COMMISSIONEFiS: NONE
ARSENT: CQMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havo hereunto set my hand this ~ day of
, 1 ~J93. . ~ l~~
.
SECRETARY, ANAhIEIM CITY PLANNINQ COMMISSION
J
~
.~. PC93-43