Resolution-PC 94-1r+^; ~
IiE ~.UTlON N0, PC94_],
}
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEI(v1 CITY PI.ANIVI'~G COMMISSIQN
THAT PETITION FQR FIECLASSI~=ICATI~N NO. 93-~4-05 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Analiefm c;ity Piannfng Commisslon did roceive e vermod petrtion 1~r
Reclassificat(on for real property situataJ in the City oi Anaheim, County ot Urange, Stato of CalHomla,
described as (ollows:
PURTION A: THAT PQRTION OF BLOCI<S A, S AiVD C OF 7HE LqR~LEI 7FlACT,
IN THE CI7Y OF ANANEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, S7ATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
SHOWN OM THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 29, PAGE 24 OF MISCEUANEOUS
RECORDS OF lOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALII~ARNIA, 70GETHER WITH THAT
PORTION OF BLQCi(S D-1 AND E- t OF THE VINYARD LOTS AS SHOWN ON THE
MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 3, PAGFS 109 AND 110 OF MISCELLANEOUS
RECORDS OF SAID LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ALL LYING 50U'fHERLY OF
LINCOI.N AVENUE /1S IT NOW EXISTS AND NOFtTHEFtLY OF 1'HE FQLLOWIN3
DESCFiIBED LINE:
BcGINNING AT A POINT ON THE CENTERLIf~IE OF EAST STR~FT, SAID POIN'~
BEING NORTH 1A DtGRFES 28' b2' WE37179.?.5 FEET F(~OM THE CENTERUNE
INTERSECTION OF SAID EAST STFiEET AND BROADWAY (WES'~~; THENCE
PARALLEL WITH THE VENTERLINE OF SAID BROADWAY SOU7W 75 DEGREES
2E' 05' WEST 124.50 FEET TO 7HE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
NOHTFiEAST~RLY tiAVINC, A RADIUS QF 2U,50 FEET; THENCE
NORTHWE5TERLY ALOMG SAID CURVE ~2.2b FEET THRQUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 90 DECREES 00' CO"; THENCE NORTH 14 DEGREEu 31' 55' WEST
99.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 7o DEG. 28' 05" WEST 931.16 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 14 DEG. 31' S5' EAS7 97.00 FEET TO 7HE HEGINNIlVC3 OF A CURVE
CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVIN(a A RADILS OF 20.5C F~ET; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SA!0 CURVE 32.20 FEET 7HROtJGH A CENTRAL
APJGEI_ OF 90.p0 D~G. 00' 00'; THfPlCE SOUTH 75 DECi. 26' 05" WE37 84.15
FEET TO A POINT ON THE CEN7E;9LINE ~OF ORANGE STHEET, SAID POINT
BEING NORTH I4 DFG. 29' S8' WEST 181.25 FECT FROM THE CENTERLINE
INTERSECTION OP SAID ORANG~ STFEET AND BROADWAY.
EXCEPT THOSE PORTION^ LYING 1'VI'fHIN EI~ST STREET, LINCOLN AVENUE
/1ND ORANGE STREET.
A~ID
PORTION B: 7HAT PORTION OF 9LOCKS A, B/1ND C OF 7HE LORELEI TRACT,
IN THE CITY UF /1NAHEIM, COUNTY OF OflANciE, STATE OF CAUFORNIA, AS
SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDEO IN BOOK 2fl, PAGE 24 ~F ~+IISCELLl+NEOUS
~ECORDS OF LUS ANGELES C~~ 'N7Y, CAUFORNlA, TOGETHER WITH THA7
POF1TfON OF BLOCK E•t OG 7H:: YINYARD IOT.r, AS SHOWN ON THE NlAP
RECOFiDED I~~ BOUK 3, PACi~S 10S ANO t 10 OF MISCEUAN~OUS RECO~iDS
OF SAIO L4S AN(iELES COUNTY, ALL IYIN~3 SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWIN(i
DESCRIBED L1NE:
Cr t 9il3M~~.1h'P .t. PCf~4-t
BEGINNING AT A?OINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF EAST STREET, SAID POINT
BEING NORTN t4 DF.G. 28' 42" WEST 179.25 FEET FROM 7HE CENTERLINE
INTERSECTION QF $AID EAST uT~EEf AND E3ROADWAY (WEST); THENCE
PARALLEL WITH THE CENTkRLINE Q~ SAID DROADV/AY SOUTH 75 ~EG. 2a' 05"
WEST 12A.5C FE~' TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.50 FEET; THENCE
NONTHN'ESTERLY ALONG SA(D CURVE 32.20 FEET THFiOUGH k CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 00' 00"; THENCE ~VORTH 14 UEG. 31' S5" WEST 99.00 FEE1';
THENCE SOUTH 75 DEC. 28' 05" WEST 93+.16 FEE?; THENCE SOUTH 1a DEG.
31' S5" EAST 97.00 F'EET 1'U TFIE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
NORT'riWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.50 FEET; THENCE
SpUTHWESTERI.Y ALONG SAID CURVE 32.20 FEET 7l~ROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 90 DEG. 00' 00"; THENCE SOll7H 75 DEG. 28' 05` WEST 84.15 FEEI'
T~J A POINT ON THE CENTERI.INE OF ORANGE S7REET, Si+!~ POINT BEING
NnRTN ia DE.r,, 2g~ ~g• WEST 1a1.25 FEET FROU THc CEt~7ERLINE
INTERSECTION OF 5AID OHANGE STREET ANQ BROADWAY.
EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS LYINr•, WITHIN E.AST STRtEf, F3ROADWAY AND
~RANG:: STREET.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commfssfon did hoid a public teearing at the Civic Center In
the City of Anahe(m on January 10, 1994 at t:30 p.m., notice of snid publ(c he~ring liaving been duly g(ven
as required by law and fn accordance with the provisiana of the Anaheim MuntclpAl Code, Chaptor t8.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and agafiist sald proposeci reciassitication and to fnvostigate and make
findinc~s and recommendatfons in connect(on thorewitlr and
WHEREPS, ~atd Commissian, efter duo inspection, investi~ation and study mado by ftseif
ancJ in its behalf, and akar due considorat(on oI all ovfdence and reports oHored at stdd hearing, doc~s flnd
and ~eterminR the follow(ng facts:
t. That tha patittoner proposes reclassification n` Part(ons A and B of subJect property os
fUIIOWS:
PQrtion A; From RM•12U0 (Residential, R~ultiple-Farnily), CL (Commercial, Limtted}, RM•2400 (Resfdentlal,
Multiple-Famfly), RS•7200 (Resfdsntial, 81nglQ-Family) and ML (Industrial, L(mitod) 7.one to RM-3000
(FlE~sidential, Mult(ple-Family) zonin~; and
PQrtf n: From RM-120C (ReSidentifll, Mult(ple•Fnmfly), RM•240Q (Resldantlal, Multfplo-Femlly), RS-7200
(Residontf~l, Sfnglo•Family) and MI. (Induscrial, LSm(tc-d) Zono to RM•2400 (Residentinl, Multiplo•Famfly)
zoning.
2. That tho Anaheim Gonoral P~an desEgnates stt~ject property tor Medium Density Rosidential
!and uses.
3. That the proposed rdclassiticatlon o( subjeai propc~rty Is necaasary ancl/or des!rable for the
orderly and proper davelopmont of the communiry.
4. That tha praposed -eclassitication o( subJ4ct pi•oparty does propArly rolate to tho zones and
their permitted u.sos locally estab~ishAd fn ciosQ proximfty to subject property arxl to the zones and their
permftted uses ~enerally established througt~out the community.
5. That one concerned person Indfcated his presenca at sald public hearlnp; And that no
correspondencn was rece:~~ed in opposftion to s~bjoct p~titlon.
•2- PC94•1
ALIF RNIA ENVIFi~NMEN7.4L OUALITY A.T FINDI,N~'i: That the Anaheim Clty Planning
Commission has reviowed the proposal t~:
(a) Reclassify Portion A(the approx(mately 13.75-2cre northerly portlon of subJect proparty) trom tl~o RM-
1200 (Resicfential, Multipla-Family), CL (Commercial, L(mit9d), RM-24C~ (Resldontlal, Multiple•Famlly),
RS•7?_00 (Residentlal, Single-Famiiy) and ML (Inclustrial, Lfmited) Zone to the RM•3000 (Resldential, Multiple-
Family) or a loss Intense zone !o construct a 2-story, 87 unit detached condominlum development with
wa~vers of r~quirement that lots abut a public street, maxfmum fonco hefght, permittod resldential structures
ar~d minimum distance between parallel building walls;
(b) ReclassiFy Portion B(the approxlmately 5.68-acre southQrly portion of subJect proporty) irom the RM-
1200 (Resldential, Mult(ple-Family), RM-2400 (Rnsidentlal, Multiple•Family), RS-7200 (Residentlal, Single-
Fam(Iy) and ML (Industrial, Lfmi4ed) Zone to the R~,~-2400 (R~sidentfal, Multiple-Famlly) ora less Intense zone
to construct a 2-story, 65 unit attached condominium dovelopment with waivers oi the requlrement that lots
abut a public stroot, maximurri fence he(ght, minimum rRCruation lefsure area and mfnimum atructural
setUack;
(c) Waivo Councll Pulicy No. 5~12 to construct residences w(tliin 100 ieet uf a railroad rlght-of-way on both
Portions A an~ B; and
(d) Establish a subdivfsion cons(sting of 95 numbered lots and 4 tettered tots (Portion A: 87 singie famlly
lots, and Portfon 8: 8 lots containing 65 air space resident(al condominlum units and 4 lettored lots)
on a rQCtangularlyshaped parcel of land consisting of approxfmately 20 acres flenerally bounded by Linaoln
Avenuo on the north, droadway on the soutl~, East Streot on the east and the Atchison-Topeka and Santa
Fo railroad right-ot•way on tho west; and does hereby approve the Ne~7ative Qeclaration upon tlnding that
tlie dsclaratfon railects the independQnt Judgement of the load agency and that It has considered the
Negative Declaration together with any comments receivecl dur(ng tho publ;c review process arvj further
finding on tlie basis of the initial study and any comments receivE±d that there Is no substantial evldence that
the pro(ec:t will have a signiticant etfect on ihe environmerit.
NOW, THF.REFO~SL, BE IT RESOLVED tl~at the Anaho(m C(ty Plannfng Commfssion does
hereby approve the 3ubject Potitlon for Reclassitication to authorfze an amendment to the Zoning Map ot
the Anah~aim Municipal Cocle to:
(a) Eaclude Porticn A!rom the FIM•t2U0 (Nes(dential, Multiple-Family), CL (Commercial, Limitod), RM•24d0
(Residential, Multipie-Family), RS-7200 (Residential, Singio•Famfly) and ML (Industrlal, Umfted) Zones and
to Incor~urate said dQSCribed proporty into the RM-3000 (Residentfal, Multiple-Femlly) Zone; and
(b) Excludo Portfon B from the RM-t200 (Residential, Mult~ple-Famfly), RM-24C0 (Residential, Multiple-
Farnily}, RS-72p0 (Fiesidant(al, Sfngle-Farnily) end ML (Industrial, Limited) Zones and to Incorporato sald
described property into ths RM-7400 (Resident(al, Muitiple-Family) Zone
upon the iollowing ~o~dit(ons wh(ch ~re hereby fuund ta be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of sub)er:t ~rop ~ny in order to preserve the safety and general v-~elfars o! the Citlzens of rho Ct:y ot Anahetm:
t. That an unsubordinated covenant shall ba recorded with th~ OHice of the Orange County Recorder
~gree(n~ to provide tfie U~yer oi each dwellinq un(t with writt~n informr~tinn obtnined trom the school
rJistr(ct{s) partaininc~ to possiblQ overcrowded conditions and bus(ng status at the schod(s) serving tho
dwellinc~ unit. A copy at the cr~venant shall be submittud to and approved by tho Cky 1lttomey prior
tn recardation. A copy of the recorcled covenant shatl be submfttvd to the Zoninp Divlsion.
•3• PC94-1
,~~
?_. That tho awn~r of subject property shall submit a lotter to the Zoning Divis(on requestin4 termination
of ~~ie fol~owing ~oning peUtions:
Variance ~•~os. 111 (to construct s 3•unit apartment building at 1012-1018 E. Cent~r St,),
329 (to construct a duplex at 112 S. Bush St.),
A37 (ror a service station at the southwost corner of Center and East St.),
547 (to construct ~ st3rvicc~ station at the southwest corner of Center and East
St,),
779 (to convort a home to an apaitmont building at 125 S. Bu3h St.),
987 (ta operata a h~alth club at 1014 ~. Center St.),
1082 (to establish a cabinet ~hop at 22~ S. Ruse St.),
13~8 (waiver of m(nimum s(de yard ~etback at 204 S. Bush St.),
1537 (walvers of minlmum square !ootagA and side yard requiraments at 125
anci 129 S. Fast St.),
1738 (waivers of r~qufred masonry wall on sfde and rear property Iines end
minin~i~m number ot parkin~ spaces at 1000 E. Llncoln Ava.),
1829 (wAivers of min(mum lot widtl~. maximum buildfn9 hefflht and minimum
building setback at 112 S. Bust St.),
1923 (to permit a cold storage operation with waivers ~! minlmum b~ilding
setback, minimum rAyulred ~H-straet parking and minimum required
Iandsr,aping at B~JO E. Broridway),
2513 (waivers of pormitted us~s and m(nimum number of requlred parking
spaces to estabiish a gift and antiquo shop in a rosidential structurg at 919
E. Broad~vay),
3010 (wavfer of minimurn number of parking spaces to estaolis'~ a commercisl
use in a rasldential structure at 924 E. Uncoln Ave.), and
34a•4 (waNers of minimum builriing s(to area, min(mum Boor area and minimum
s(d~ yard setback to construr,t a second cJetacheci single•tamily residence
at 1003 E. Broadway); and
C~ndition~l Use Permit Nos.
105 (t~ establish a service station at tho southwost corner of I.(rtcoln Ave.and
F;ose St.), and
d37 (to pe~mit an existing servico statton as a c~niorming uso ~n the Cl. Zone
at the sc~uthwost corner of Lincoln Ave. and East St.), and
2118 (to retain a radiator shop in tFie CL Zone wlt~~ waivors of minfmum
landscaped setb~ck and required s(te screening 102q E. Uncoln Ave.).
3. TI-~at prior to placem~nt of an ordfnanco rezoning ~ubjuct proptxty on an egen~a for Giry C~uncil
consideral(on, Conditfon Nos. t and 2., above•m~n~tone~i, shall t;e compl~ted. The Cfty Council may
approve or disapprove a zoning ora(nance at its d(scretio~. If the ordfnanco 13 dlsApproved, the
procedure set forth in Anaheim ~~lunfcipal Code Secti~n 18.03.OH5 ~hall npply. The prov(slona or rights
grantod by this resolution shall becomo nuti and void by acticn at tho Planning Comml ,slan untoss said
condit(ons aro complied with wlthin ano (t) year irom tha clate of this rosolutfon, or cuch furthor ttme
as the Planning Commission may flrant.
A. That approval of this appl~cat(on constitutes approvai of the proposed requost only to the extent that
It complfas wfth the Ans.hoim Municipal Zoning Coc1e ancl any other applfcable Ciry, Stete anu F~deral
re{~utatlons. Approval does not include any actlon or findin~s as to compliance or approval of the
request regardin~ any other applicable ordfnance, regulatfon or requirement.
.q_ PC94-1
BE IT FURTHER RE50LVEQ that the Anaheim City Pianning Commfssion does horeby find
and determfne that adoptlon of this Resolution is axpressly predfcated upon applic~-nYs compNance with
eacl~ 1nd ali of the conditlone~ harefnabove set forth. Should any suoh c~ndltlons, or any part thereof, be
declared invaiid or unenforceable by the final Judgment of any court of competont Juri3dlc~lon, then this
Resolution, and nny appravels herein contained, shal! be doemed null and void.
BE IT FURTI-IER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constituto A rezoning oi, or a
corn~nitmant by tho City to rezone, the subJect property; ~ny such rezoning shall require an ordlnance af
the Clty Council whic:h shall be a tegislative act which may be approved or denied by the City Cauncfl at
its sole dlscr4tion.
THE FQREGOING RFSOLUTIAN was adopted at the Planni q Com-n(ssi~n moeting of
January 10, 1994. ~//1 ~ ~
_._....~" ' ` ~/~1""
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEI CI7Y PL NNING COMMIS810N
ATTEST:
j , -
' S RETARY, AN ~IM CITY PLANf~ING COMMISSIC~N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF APdAHEIM )
I, Janat L. Jenson, Secretay of the An~heim C(ty Plannfng Commissfon, do hereby certify
th~t the foregoing resolution was passe~J and adopted at n meetln~ of ihe knaheim Ciry Planning
Comm(ss{on held on January 10, 1~, by the follow(ng vota of tho members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EOYDSTUN, CALDWELL, HENNING~R, MAY~R, MESS~, PERAZA, TAIi
NOES: COMMISSiI~MERS: NONE
E DSEN': COMMiSSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WNEREOF, I h•~ve hereunto set my hand thls ". r~1., day of / ~~
1994. (
`J~~^ CR~~ y~ N EIM CITY PLANNINCi COMMISSInN
r
,5_ PG9M1-i