Loading...
Resolution-PC 94-112RrSOLUTION NO PC~}•11?. A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PUINNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 92G1 BE GRANTED WHCREAS, the AnAheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Fetitian tor Varianco fnr certaln re~l property situated In the City of Ai~ahelm, County ui Orange, State oi Calffornia dQSCribed as: PARCEL t, IN THE CITY 9F ANAHEIM, COUVTY OF URANGE, STATE OF CALIFOHNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAF' FILEU IN E300K 50. PAGE 36 ~F PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE GOUNTY RECORDER OF .~iAlD COUNTY. NOTE: 7HE SOUTHEASTERLY PORTION OF SAID LAIJ~ HAS BE[N RE- SUBDIVIDED AND IS ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL 1 IN ThiE ~;ITY OF ANHHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CAUFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILFD IN BOOK 144, P/1GE8 18 ANO 19 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE QFFICE OF THE LOUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, thA Chy Planning Commission did hold e public hearing at tho Civi~ Center in the City ot Anaheim on August 22, 1994, at 1:30 p.m., notice of sald puWic hearing ~~aving been duly gh~en as requirod by law and In accordance with the prcvisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear ancf considor evidence tor and ~gainst sakl p~oposed varienco and to fnvestigato and make lindings and recommendntions in connectiun therowith; anci WHEREAS, said Cummission, eher due inspectfon, irnestigation and study made by ~tsell a:x1(n its behaN, and aRer due constderation of all evidence arxi roports oNered at said hoartng, does tirxl ar,d determine the lollowing lacts: That the petMtoner proposes •Meiver oi the fdlc~Ning to construct a 4d sq.h. ~vall sign: 5ections_iB,Q6.09LQ3Q - .~ll~SL~lI'-~b~~ ~ w~ll_s(~n,~. ~44•08~ r1 ~rrr,med ir, the Scenic Corrkfor; ~ proposed) n t ~t't2~Q'~.4 2. That thoie aro apecial circumsta~u:ea applicable to the pruperty consiating of its loc.~tlon towarcls thu rear of an exl3ting commercial ahopping center, that tho tx~siness is partiolly bla;kecl from view by an existing buNdmg, a»d Ihat the existing building has lwo main entrances: ane lar,ing Impertal Highway a~xl the other tacing tlie interSor ot Ihe commercf~l shopping canter; 3. 7hat strlct appl~Cation c~f tho Zoning Ccx1e dQprives the property oi prfvUoges enjoyecl by o~her properties under kfentkal xoniny d~ssilicaUa~ in sub{~:t inlegrated commerctal shoRp(ng center be~ausa Planning Commia~lon has proviously graMOd almilAr wafvora allowin~ two wall signa on separate lacades o1 the same buHdiny/tmiant s{rsco: C~x~ditbnat Use Pe-mh No. 3~244 (Btorkbuster Vido~) and No. 34'70 (Cinnamon Works); and 4. That no ono irxlirated thelr presencg at eaid public f-earin~ In oppositlan: arxl that no corresporxleruo was roceived in oppoaitbn to subject petitfon. cau~o~igENVIR~NtdEt,~~UAI,lL'L.a~c"~Ll~~~.4~ The Flanning Diroctor or hib au~horiz~c! reareaor,tativa h~ia dRterminecf tt~at Ihe proposed prqrsct locate~] at tho northwaat cornQr d Avenicl;: Bernardo Nonh aM Im~erfal Highway, havirq approx~mate iromagea ot ~ 8r (eet on thu north sicfe uf Avpnicfa BernanC.y NuAh and 221 lent on lho wout si0e A( IrttpBrfal Fiiflhwey end (urthor dese~fUect as 1 A1 Soulh Irnperfal Highvray ~alla vrithin the dMinNlon nf Cst~or cal Exert+plfons, Gasn S t, oA defintxl in tho State ~!R Ciui~a.linrs anct ia, ~h,ere(ore, catagaically cncempt trom tho requiremeM to prepar~ an EIA. CA?.1 ~SMS.ViIP • t• PC94 • t 12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm City Plan~ing Crnnmission doos horoby grant subJect Petition ior Varianco, upnn the iollowinp conditions which are horeby tound to bo a nocossary prerequlsite to the proposed use of the sub~ect property in order to preserve the sa~ety and c~eneral welfare ot the Citizens of the City ot Anaheirn: t. That tl~e owner pf subJect property shall submit a letter requesting ;erminetlon of Conditional Use Psrmit No. 3574 (perrnitting ~n 8,i50 sq.ft. somi-enclosed res4aui~ant with on•premises salb and consumption of bear ar!d wlne, and with wt-ivers) to the Zoning Division. 2. That suh~ect property sfialt ba developed substant(ally in accordance wRh plans and specificat(ons submitted to the City of AnAhoim by the petRioner and which plans are on (Ite wfth the Planning Department markod Gxhibft No. 1. 3. That prlor to commoniement of tho nctivity here(n approved, or prior to issuanco o( A permR by the Building Division, or within a period of one (1) year from the data of this resd~rtion, whichever occurs lirst, Corufitfon No. t, above-montioned, shaU b~ complivd with. Extensions for furthor time to complete sa(d cunditions may te granted !n accordunce whh Sectlon 10.03.a90 oi tfie Anaheim Municipal Code. 4. That approval o} this application constitutes ~ppraval of the proposod reyuest only to the e~ent that it complios with the Anaheim Municipai Zoning Code ancl any othor applicable City, 5tato and F~~~i~~r~l regulatfons. Approval does not fnclude any acti~n or iindfngs as tu compllance or approval • ~he request r~3gardin~ any other applictiWe ordinance, reguletion or requirement. BE I'~ FURTH~R RESOLVED tf~at the Annheim City Ptanninp Comndssion does horeby find and determine that adoption ot :h(s Rosolucfon is expressly prediratad upon applicanYs compliance with ~rach ~ncf all of tho corxfftions hereinabove set (ortl~. Should any such conditlon, or any part tliereot, be declarcxf invalid or unentorce~ble by the final Jucfgment ot any cuurt oi competent Jurisdiction, then thia Flesolutfon, ancf any approvals herein contalnod, shall be dtemed null and void. THE Fr1REG01NG RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commissfon mo~ling of /lugust 22, t994. ~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~ f~-~..~ C AIRWOMAN, MIAHEIM GITY P NNING COMMISSION Al'TEST: ~i7/1.ri~'.-~( .~i,~.._,. __J ,S~'CRETP.RY, AN~kHEIM CITY r'lA(~NIMG COMMISSION (__-~ %/ STATE OF CAUFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORPNCiE ' ss. ClTY OF ~1NAHEIM ) I, Janpt l. Jensen, 5ectetary cf Ihe Anahefm Cfly P!annfnq Conmissfon, do heraby CerlNy trk~t Ino tor~oing rosdution was passed ar~ ~dopted at a mc~ting c~i the Anaheim City Planning Cbmmfssfon hold cxi P.uyuat 22, 1994 by the tdlowi~ vc~to ol the memR~ors thereAf: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: 90YOS"rUN, CAI.OWELL, HENNINGER, MA'fER, TAIT NOES: COMMISSIONE:RS: NONE ABSEMT: COMMISSIONERS: M~S5E, PERAZA IN V~/1TNES~ WMEREJF, I havy hereunto s~t my harxl lhia ,~t~~ aay o1,,~~~/~„1fl94. ,.., _ , , •Cq~'{qpY, , EIM CITY PU1NNItVG C:OMM13S14N ~ . '/ , .2. PL'f~~-112