Resolution-PC 94-113RESGLt~TIQN N~.,, P~ 94-113
A RESOLU710N UF THE ANAHEIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
AOQP'rING AND RECOMti1ENDING TO 7HE CITY COU~ICIL ADdPTIUN OF
THE LA~vD USE, CIRCULATI0~1 l,tva ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE AND
MANAGEMENT ELEMENTS DESIGNATED AS
GENERAI_ PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 333
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ol Anaheirn did adopt the Anaheim General Plon by
Resolution No. 69R-644, showing the general dc~scription and extent of possibls future development within
ihe Cily; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commisslon by Rusolution No. I~C94-102 initiated General Plan
Amondment No. 333; and
WNEREAS, General Plan Arnendment No. 333 (s to amnncl the Land Use, Cfrculation ~"ri
Envirornnentai Resource and Management Elernents ot the GHneral Plan as set torth in Attachment A, wiiacii
fs incorporated horein, and furthor dQSCribed as follow~:
(A) L~rd Use Element
1) The Cfty of Anaheim General Pfan designates the approximately 1,046-acre Anaholm
Re; ort, includiny the 549 5•acre area encompassed by the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan, for Commercial Recreatioii tand uses. 1'he proposod nmendment would amend
the Land Use Element 5y revising the text of the Commerciel Recreation land use
designatfon to recognize tl,: ~ the Anahoim Resort Spacific Plan, In additfon to 7he
Disneyland Resort Specffic Plan, the Hotel Circle SpecH(c Plan and the PR (Public
Racroational) Zone, implements the Cumrnorcial Recreation laiid use designatlon and
establfshee rnFVClmum development density desfgn~ttons.
`Commercial•Recreatfon•-The Commercial•Fiecroation catogorywas adopted by theCity
in the 19GU's to encourage commercial•recreat!on land uses primarily In the Anaheim
Corn~ention Center/Disneylancl area, c~~rrently relerred to 3s tl~e approximato 1,046•acre
Anaheim Resort, and in the area around the Anaheim Stadlurn. For the Anaheim
Rosort, ti~e Comniercial•Recreation category is im~lemonted by tha Anaheim Rosort
Sper,ific Plan, The ~isneyland Aesort Specilir. F'lan and the Hr~tel Circle Specific Plan.
Fu: thc~ area aro~md the Anaheim ' iium, this cate~ory is implemented by the PR
(Pubtic fiQCreationa~) Zono.
The Anaheim Rasort 5peciHc Plan provides tor tlie development ot approximately 5d9.5
ecrus within two land use Districts and a Mobile~iome Park Ovortay: tha C•R
(Commerctal Rucrea~(on) DtslrfGt which allow5 lor hotels, motels, conventlon and
cenferencg facilities, ae well as rest~urants, retail shops and entertainmont facHkies; the
PR (Public Recreationj Uistrict which encompasses the A~eheim Cornuntion Center and
associated parking lacilitias and provides tor tho ordorly uso of Cityowned property as
we11 as tt~e existing Anaheirn liilton NotM: ancl, the Mobflehome Park (MHP) Overtay
which encam{~asses axisting moDi!ehome parks witl~in the C•f~ Ofstrict nncl provkles
dovelopment standnrds for mobilehome parks ancJ rapulattons and prnceclures to
miti~ate relocation concerns and aclver~e eltects of clisplacement upon mobilehome
owners when e park is converted to another land use. The AnAheim Resort Spocific
Plan als~ identifies rnaximurn dmrelopmant density designations in Ihe C•R Ofstnct.
CR2181W.w~ •t- PC9d-1 t9
These desipnations are based upon hotol/motal development and allow up to 20~6 of
each hotel/motel prcJoct gross squaro footage, excluding parking facflitios, to I~e
developgd with integreted (I.o., included w'thin the maln hotol/motel complex)
accessory uses. These accessoiy uses wlll roduce the otherwise maximum pennitted
hotoi/motel densfty at the rate ~f one hotel/mot~l room pQr six hundred (600) gross
sa,uare feet of accessory use. For propertios proposcad to be developed w(th permitted
and conditfonaily permittod uses ottier than hotols/motels with accessory uses, tho
traHic generation chai acteristics of said uses shall not exceed those essociated wlth the
otherw(se perm(tted hotal/motel (includiny accessory uses) dansity as dotermfned by
the Clty Traffic and Transportation Managar prlor to Final Site Plan revfew and approval.
The designatlons are as follows: "Low Densfty", wliich has a niaximum dens~ty of up to
50 rooms per gross ~cre or 75 raoms per lot or parcel, whichever is grer~ter; "Low-
Med(um Density", up to 75 room3 per gross acre or 75 rooms per Io4 or paroal,
whichever Is ~reatar; "Medfum Density", up to 100 raam3 per gross acre or 75 rooms
por lot or parcel, whichever fs greator; c~nd, "Conventfon Center (CC) Modium Donsity",
up to 125 rooms per gross a~re with trip fleneration characteristlcs miti~eted to the
aqufvalent nf 100 rooms per gross acre, or 75 rooms por lot or parcel, whichever is
qroater. For those parc:els that are devoloped with hote!/motel rooms which oxceed
tha mau!mum density designation, the number of rooms existing on the date of
adoption of thv Anahelm Rusort Spec!(ic Plan ~Jrdinance may bo rohuitt or malf(led et
thefr existiny density."
The amendment also proposes to upgrade thv Water System Maps and amend tha
Storm Drafn and Sewer Maps to reflect the irnproveirients doscribed in Section 4.0,
Public Facilitfes Plan, ot the Specitic Plan document as further dc~tailad in DEIR No. 313
and Mitigatlon Monitorfny Program No. 0085.
(B) ~(rculatlon Element • The Cfrculation Element identities a number oi arterial higlr~vays whfch
servo tlia Anaheim Resort. Ir. connectlon with the Rnaheim ~Sesort SpecNic Plan, a number ot
modilir,etions are proposed to tho circulatlon system. Foilowing Is e Iist o- the pro~osed
umendments:
t) To redasignate ClementinA Streei between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue
from a Secondary Arterial Ftighway (4 lanes, 90-foot right-of•way) to a Mafifleci
Seconclary Arterial Hi{~hway (4 lanes, 87•foot ri~ht-of-way) designatian.
2) To rodesignate Convention Way beN+een Harbor Boulevard and approxfmat~ly 1,450
foet west of Harbc~r Boul~vard (rom a Prfmary Arterial ~lighway (6 lanes, 106-foot right-
rt-way) to a ModHicxf Primar/ Arter(ai H(ghway (a lanes, 110•toot riflht•of-woy)
dosignation.
3) T~ redcssignate Pacfifco Avenuo between H~rbor Boulovard t~nd H~stor ~treet Irom a
Ma~or Arterial Hfghway (B lanes, 120•~oot riqfit-ol-way) to ~ W14di(laci F'rlrnary Rrtorlal
Highway (6 lanes, t 10•loot right-of•w~y) detiignatfon.
4) To redesfgnate tho portion of ManchestQr Avenue parallding Itia l•5 oast of H~rb~r
Boulmrard to north of Alro Way from a Sccondary Arterlal Highway (~1 lanes, JU•~tc~ot
right•nl•w~y) to e Mociitied Sec~mciary Artertal Highwey (d lanes, 67•foot right•of-wayj
desiflnation.
5) To redesignatR Manchester Avenue sout~ ut tt-a purtinn para!leiing tha I•5 (Alro Wey)
to the intersection of Froedrrian Way irom a Sdcondary Arteria; H(ghway (4 lanea, 90-
foot riflht•of•way; :o a Modifled Secondtry Anerfal H(gl~way (4 lanos, 87•foot rlgM•of•
way) dESfgn~tlun.
.2. PC~J4-113
6) Crltical Intersection (:larification - Toxt Is p-~posed to he added to the Circulation
Element clarifying that the Critical Intersection dos(c~n for Conventfon Wa,y/Haibor
Doul~vard, Harbor E3oulovard/Katella Avenuo, Hastor Street-Anaheim Boulevard!KAtella
Av~nue and Pacit(co Avenuo/Hast~r Struet also includes the Anahelm Resort required
street parkways/sidewalks as well as the rQquired thr~ugh-travel lanes, left-turn lanes
and rlght•turn-oniy lane. Tho Anaheim Resort street parkway/sidewalk designs are
identifiod fn Tho Anaheim Hesort Public Realm Landscape Program.
All streots categorized ac "Modifieci" wlll be added ta the Circulatlon Efement "Exceptions
List" which idontfties variatlona to the "MaJor", "Primary", And "Socondary" arterlal highway
designations.
(C) Erivironmental Resource s~nd Management Element: The General Plan Environmontel Resource
and Manaqement Element designates approxfmately 58 acres southeast of Katella Avonue and
Fiarbor E~oulevard as an Agrlcultural Preservn. It should be notod that thoro (s an error on the
existlny General Plan map with regard to loc~tion and acroago - the General Plan currently
shows an Ayriculturai Preserve area north of ttie actual property location with approximately 58
acres; Figure ~I (provided (n AttAChment A of this resolution) shows the corroct I~cation and
reilocts the actual sizo of 56.A8 acras. Currontly, thi3 acreage is subJoct to a California i.and
Conservatlon Act (Williamson Act) contract. A not(ce of non-ranewal has boen filed and the
cont!act wili ezpire on March t, 2000. Since one ot the purposes of ihe General Plan Is to sot
forth long range plans for the City, the proposed amendment would remove the Agricultural
Preserve designation for tf~is acreage from the General Plun In recognition of the upcominq
contract expiration.
WHEREAS, thP proJoct aroa encompasses the area as identiiled on Goneral Plan Amendment
No. 333, Figur~;s l through 4, with(n tho City of An~heim's Anahe(m Resort, qenerally located adJacent to
and ~~uthwest of the Santa Ana Freoway (I•5) and accessiblo tram Harbor 6o~levard, Ball Road, Freedman
WAy, l4~tella Avenuo, West Street, Orangewood Avenue, Haster StreetJAnaheim Eioulevard and Wainut
StfP.CI; 8f1C1
WHEREAS, the Planniny Departmont deamed it appropriate, pursuant to the provlsions of the
C~lifornia Environmental Ouallty Act, to prepare Env(ronmental Impact Report No. 313; aruJ
WHEREAS, tho Anahofm City Planning Cornmissi~n did hold a public hearing at tho City Council
Chambers, Anahoim, Ca~itornfa, on August 29, 199d, at 10:3Q a.m., notice of so(d pubiir, hearing having been
duty given as required by law and in 2ccordance with th~e provislons ot the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear
and consider• evid~~~ce (or and agafnst said proposed General Plan Amendment No. 333 in connection with
Environmontal impact Report No. 3t3, the Anaheim Re~ort Spaci(ic Plan No. 92-2 (including Zoning and
Dovelopment Standards, a Design Plan 7nd Guidelin3s, And a Public Facilides Plan), the Ana~ielm Resort
Identfty Program, the Anahelm R~sort Public Reatm Landscapo Program and tl~e Anahafm Rosort
Noncontorminc~ Sfqnage Proc~ram and to invostiflate s id maka (indings and recommer~dations in connection
therev+itli.
WHcREAS, tho Commfssion, after duc~ insp~ction, invos-(gat(on nnd study made by itself and
In its behalf, and aRer due consideratfon uF sll evidence and raports offored at safd hearing tinds thet:
The amerxfinent to the I~nd Use Element text pr~vidos a doscr(ption of the Anaha(m Rosort
Specffic Plan, iurtlier clarityfng the types ~~~d Icvel of developrnent pormittocf within the
Commercfal Recreatfon lancl use design~tfon.
The amendmonts to the V~ator System Maps and the Storm Drain and Sewar Maps reflect the
imnrovements dosc~fbed In Sectfon 4.0, Public Facilities Plan, ot ths Specitic Flan documont as
further r~etaflPti in DEIR No. 313 an,~i Mitigat{on Monitoring Program No. 0085 and that these
amondments aro c~der~uate to accornmoclate the pru~ectecl lavel of inlrastructure neecls oi the
prc,ject orea.
-~• PC94-t 13
_ ,...
3. The amendmonts to the Circulation Element roadway classlficationa, which primarily refloct
either a reduction in rfght-of-way or oxistinti conditlons, are ad~quate to accommodete ttia
projected level of traFflc and circulation plans ior the projoct area. 7he proposed ciariiicatfon
with regard to critical fntorsection desfgn is to provide further clarity as to tho ultimate right-of-
way widths at these fntersections. Cr~ss-sections showing the proposvd Nidths are provided
in Sect(on 4.0, "Public Facilitles Plan," of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan document.
4. The amendm~nt to the E'nvironmontal Resourco and Manapernent Element would r~move tho
Agrfcultural Preserve designe.tion for sub~ect 56 acres from the Genoral Plan in recognitian oi
the upcomfng Wilifamson Act contract expiration. A~rlculturAl uses, however, will contlnue to
be a permitted uso (~ the Anaholm Resort Specific Plan, C-R Ilistrlct.
5. Tho ev(denc~ presented substantlates the need for an amendment to iha Anahelm General Plpn
and therofore, the Land Use Element, Exldbit A; the Circulation Element, Exhibit A, Figures 4
and 5; and, the Fnvironmental Ftosource and Management Element, E~:lilbit A, Ffguro 2, should
be adoptad.
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEC~A Guidelines Secti~n 15063, after considering ~raft Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) No. 313 in connectlon with General Pian Amendment No. 313, the Anahelm Resurt
SpQCific Plan No. J2•2 (including Zoning and Dsvelopment Standards, a Design Plan end Guidelines, anci
a Public Facilitlos Plan), the Anaheim Resort Identfty Proyram, the Anaheim Resort Public Realm l.andscape
Program, the Anaheim Resort Nonconforming Signage Program and tuture disc~etionary actions descrfbed
in DEIR No. 313 (collectively the "discretfonary a~tions"j, and roviewing evidence presented, both written and
oral, to supplemunt Draft Elf~ No. 313, on August 29, 1994, the Anaheim City Flanning Commission
recor*~mended hy motion, that the City Council certify EIR No. 313 and adapt the Stoterr~ent of Findings and
Facts and Statoment of Qverrid(ng Considerations, and adopt Mitigation MonltorinA Program No. 0085,
based upon tho (ollowinp findings:
A. EIR N~. 313 is in complfance wlth the State of California EnvironmentAl Qualfty Act and the State
and City CEOA Guidelines;
B. The project is consistent witF~ the Intent of tha City's Gener~l Plan, as amended by Gon~ral PIAn
Amondment No. 333, for the area and wiU be compatfble wiih surrounding land uses;
C. Section 15091 of the State CEQA Gufdelines requfres that one or more findings be made tor each
signiticant environmental QNect idei~tif(ed. Tho Planning Commission horeby adopts the Statement
of Findinps and Facts set forth In Attachmont D of the August 29, 19~J4 staff report to the Planning
Cornmission.
D. The Planning Cnmmission further determinas that the benafits of the proJect outwei~h the
unavoidable adverse environmental impacts, and, tharelore, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 15093 ot the 5tate CEOA Guidel(nes recommends adoption ot the Statement of Overrfdfng
Cunsidorations which is set torth in Attachment D of the August 29,1 J94 staff report to the Plnnninp
C~mmissfon.
E. In accordanco witY~ Saction 21081.6 of the Public Roso~~rces Code, the mftigatlon measures have
been fncorporated into a ~ditigation MonirorinQ Program {Wo. 0085) as set forth ir~ full toxt In Section
V of the August 2~, t994, staH report to the Planning Commission, and are included as conditions
of approval for tho proJect .
F. EIR No. 313 is adayuate to serve as the environmental documontation fa- the discretfonary actions.
,,~. PC94-113
~*i
r
NOW, ThIEREFORE, BE IT F~E30LVED that pursuant to the above findings, and based on the
submitted documonts and oSher informatlon presonted as a part of the publfc hearing process, the Anahelm
City Plannin~ Commisslon does heroby adopt and recommend to the City Councfl nf the City of Anahelm
adoptlon of Gcneral Plan Amendment No. 333, Land Uso Element, Exhibit A; Circulatlon Element, Exhibit
A; and, Environmental Resource and Manapement Element, Exhibit A. Coples af these exhlbits are attacFied
to this Resolutlon as Attachmont A.
THE FORCGOING RESOLU7IQN was adopterJ at tho Planning Commission meeting uf
Auc~ust 29, 1994,
~ G~ ~l i~
i C, /,/~ ,''~~ ca.....
C AIRWO Af~ N - '
ANAHEIM CIIY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTES7:
a~.~-~ ~J
SECRETA Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATF OF CAIiFORNIA )
COUNTY dF QRANGE ) ss.
C!iY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahefm City Pianning Commiaslon, d~ heroby certffy tliat the
foregoinc~ r~solutlon was passocl and adopted at u meoting of th~ Anaheim City Planning Commission held
on Auc~ust 29, 1994, by the following vote of the mombers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUN, CALDWELL, HENNINGER, MAYER, PERAZA, TAIT
NOES: VOMMISSfONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMNSISSIONERS: MESSE
IN WITNESS WHEREUF, I have hereunto set my hand thls_~p~ dayof
1994.
~O ~-'u'"~• ~da.~~.r
SECRErARY
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COiVIMISSION
-5• PC94-113
~"""
ATTA~HMEhIT A
G~NIERI~-L PLAN AoVIENLIMENT EXHIB!'FS
-6- PC94-t 13
GENERAL PI.AN AMENDMEN'f NO. 333
LAND USE ELE[v1GI~T
Exhibit A
A, Gcncral Plan Amcndmcnt No, 333 amcnds thc tcxt dcscribing thc Commcrcial-Rccreation cutcgory [o ~cad
us foll~ws: "Commcrcial-Rccrention--7'hc C:ommcrcial-Rccrcation catcgory was ~dopted by thc Ciry in tlic
19G0's to encourage commercial-recreation land uses priu~arily in the Anaheim Conventien
l;cntcr/Disncyland arca, currcntly rcferrcd to as the upproximate 1,04G-acrc Anaheim Resort, and in lhc
area around the Anaheim Stadiurn. Por the Anahcim Rcsort, the Commercial-Rccrcation category is
implcmcntcd by thc Anahcim Rcsort SpcciGc Plan, The Disncyland Rcsort Specific Plun and thc I-Iotcl
Circle Spccitic Plan. For lhe arca around thc Anahcim Stariium, this category is implemented by the PR
(PuUlic Rccreatior,al) Zonc.
'Cl~c Analicim Resort SpcciCic Pl~n providcs for thc devclopment oF appro.~imately 549.5 ucres within two
lund usc Districts and a Mobilehomc Park Ovcrlay: th,. C-R (Commcrcial Rccrcadon) District whicli allows
for hutcls, motcls, convcntion and confcrcncc facilitics, as wall as restuurants, retail shops ancl cntertainmcnt
fucilitics; thc PR (Public Rctrcation) Dislrict which cncompasscs thc Annhcim Convcntion C:cntcr and
assoc;ated parking facilities and provides for the orderly usc of City-owned propcrly as wcll ns th: exisling
Anaheim Hilton Hotel; and, the Mobilchome Park (MH~) Overlaywhich cncompasses existing ntobilehome
parks within thc GR District and providcs development standards for mobilchomo parks and regulations
and procedures to mitigutc relocation concerns and udversc effects of displacemcnt upon mobilehomc
owners when a park is converteJ ta uno[her land use. The Anaheim Resort 5pccifc Plan also idcntilies
maximum dcvclopmcnt density designations in the C-R District. These designations aro based upon
hotcl/motcl devclopmenl and allow up to 20% of cach hotel/motcl project gross square footage, excluding
parking facilitics, tu be dcvclopeJ wilh intcgrated (i.e., induded within thc main hotcl/nwtel complcx)
accessory uses. 1'hese accessory uses will rcduce the otherwisc maxiinum permitted hotcl/motcl density at
thc ratc of onc hotcl/~nutcl room pcr six hundreJ (G00) gross syuare fcet of accessory use, For propcrtics
proposcd to bc dcvclopcd with pcrmittcd and conditionally perniitted uscs othcr than hotels/motels with
ucc.cssory uscs, thc traffic gcncration chaructcristia5 of said uscs shall not exsced thosc associated with thc
otherwisc pcrmittcd hotcl/motel (including acccssory uses) dcnsity as determined by thc City Traftic and
Transportation Manager prior to Final Sitc Plan revicw and approval. The designations are us follows: "Low
Dcnsity', which i~as a m;vamum density of up tu 50 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or purccl,
whichever is greater; "Low-Medium Dcnsity", up to 75 rooms per E;ross acre or 75 rooms pcr lot or pareel,
whichcver is grcatcr; "Mcdium Dcnsity", up to 1(~ rooms pcr gross acrc or 75 rooms pcr lot or Qarcc.l,
whichcvcr is grcatcr; and, "Cimvcntion Ccntcr (CC) Mcdium Qensity", up to 125 rooms pcr gross ucrc with
trip gcncration characieristics mitigateci to the cquivalcnt of 100 rooms per gioss acre, or 75 rooms per lot
or p~rccl, whichcvcr is 6rcatcr. For thosc parccls that arc dcvclopcd with hotcl/motcl ruoms which excccd
thc masimum Jcnsity Jcsignation, thc numUcr of rooms cxisting an thc datr, of aJoption of thc An~hcim
Rcsort Spcr.i~c Plan Orciinancc may hc rcbuilt or modiPicd at thcir c~isting dcnsity.
[i. Thc amcndmcnt also proposcs to up~radc lhc Watcr Systcm Maps enJ Amcnd thc Storm Drain and Scwcr
Maps to rcflcct the improvcmcnts dcscriUcd in Scction 4.0, Pubyc Facilitics Plan, of thc Spccific Ylan
Jocumcnt a.c furthcr dcta'sled in CIR No. 313 und Mitigation Monitoring Progrxm No. 0085.
,7_ PC94-113
EXISTINC; EIVVIROtVMIEPVT,4L RESOU~iCE
APVD MANAGEMEN~' ELEI'JIEN~' MAP
~
wC:T 3TIlplT TO CNp
~ iHCUI•~O~~~p~~
~
~
~ ~~~~~
) ,'~
~~
~ ~
~ o ~
. -
N ` yr~.. ~
W Y~~,
CU~V[~ -OIIT0~1 ,,, b
~ ~ ,1(AU4Nl01 m ~~'R,f 7~•~, ~~ ~
~ v~vue ''~^
~
x q ' ~
~ ,~ ~
• • s o • ~a • a o o e • • • ~• • s
A ~, ~ ~ JitEEDMAIV WAY ~
; ~~ .oo ~~
Q • ~ y ~
"~ ' ~ 1~ ~
- ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~e~ ~~~~ ~
nnrftu ~vEVUe •
~
: ~
CONVENTION WAY <;,S ~ PAdAGO AVF,
~1~ ~ _ ~'~~
:~i
~ ~ 6`~ -
N`
~ ORANtiE1N000 AVENUF. i ~
LEvENO: Q
••• Ealnlnp ~rd W~n~ed Powe~ E~~+n»nt lac~tlon
~ lwd dodpn~t~d Apr4cuhunl Pnwrw ~ ~ ~~~
~ f000 2000 ~~00 f~~t
GAneral Plan Amondmont No. 333
Existinfl
Fipura 1
-H-
PC9d-113
ENWIRON~ENT~L RE~OURCE ~ND
M~fVAC~EPi19ENT ELEfVIENT N9AP
I `
~4CST lTIIC[7 TO CHO ~
~ ~N ~~~ ~ 1 Ao,~ -
W
~
~ S
AvAVUE
~
x
3
o • ~ • s
•
•
O
~
CU~VtD POATON ~
111CAUONLDI ,
~
~
~
M~ ~
+~ o
~~ i
~I ~
x~ ~ B 1
~
~~~~~~~)
KA7Ff.LA AVJVUE
..~ ~~,~_
> '~~
`~
a
E °
~ ~~
7
~~~ l~
a
~~'.~. ~r ~O O
~~~ ^ ~~~ ~ a
fA~EI~MAN WAY ~
~~ ~~~
~~~~ ~~~~~ ~
w~
~
CONVfM10N WAY N PAdACO AVE,
~~ ~~ ~~~~~
~~ ~~
oRANGEWG00 AVfNUE ..
LEGUID:
• O • EYINnp ~nd W~nrvsd Pow~r E~nrront I.x~tbn
Genoral Plan Amendment No. 333
Exhibit A
Fipuro 2
-9-
I'C9=1-113
EXISYINt~ CIR~ULATION ELE1111ENT MAP
~~
I
WC3T 7TR[!T TO !ND
~ IN CU40f~SAC
BALL
F.
~
H
CEARlTOS
ii~ m
lS~cp~du~rl
ti ~
Z
~
~~~
1
9 ~
3 ~
~~ m
~,PApfiCO AVE,
~~ ~
LEGEND:
~ya -+qr*~Y
^~~i^ ~s~..n
~ ~ rr*wv -~br+Mr `~'
~al! S~ccnwY ~r
~ ~ GtJal Ireaw~fon ~~-~-~
~ J 0 I000 2000 JOOOfMt
Genera{ Plan Amendment No. 333
~CISTING
Fpwe 3
-to- r~c~n-ii~
CIHCl1LATfON ELEMENT MAP
uiwros
~~
.
a
x
3
~
~PARHCIO AYF,
~~ ~
IfGENC:
~ -we~ n4rf
S ^ ^' M-~ f~*ww~~w
~ ~ 1nnv1 ~~f
r~ S~aareiYp ~~-
~ ~ C/a~ u~MMCren
ta A~.M raaP~. tMtR te G,a~,~on~ ;~n
N nr«+r ~~pn..~~ wpnv.w•w~~ 4,n~e~
1 qw~ S
~-~ ~~
0 ~OGQ t~0oc~ fOr70 ~r+~
~;t~ier~l P1a~+ Amendmont I~1o. 33~
Exhib~t A
f;puro 4
_~~_
1'c' :~ 1-1 1 3
(t Cf 2i
HIGHWAY
PacHlco Ave.
qomenttno St
CIRCUI.ATION ELFMENT
~J(CEPTIONS LIST TO
ARTERIAL HIGHV1iAY (RIGHTS-O~-WAY
Ha~ wiani FRaeu
CI.ASSi~fCAT10N LIMI'fS MQNUMENTED CENTERLINE
ModHled Frlmary Naster St. to 55.00 it.
karbor Blvd.
ModHled Secondary Katella Ava. to 43.50 ft.
OrangAwood Ave.
Manchoner Ave. Modmed Secondary
l:onvenGon Way ModHied Prlmary
Par~allellnp lnterstate 5 33.50 ft.
east of Herbor BMJ.
ta nor~h ot Alro Way
South oi Ihe pnAlon 43.50 it.
parallNinp 1•y (Alro Way)
to the IMerseetton ot
FruecJman Way
Approxim3toly 1,d50' wesi of 55.00 it.
Harbor 81vd. (p Harbor BNd.
Gonsral pl~n AmenQmonc No 333
Exh~ait A
Fiyurg 5
-i~
(~c:!).t. l 13
(2 cr 2~
ATTACHIIAE~dT B
STAT~MENT O~ FINDINGS AND FACTS
AND
STATEIUyENT OF OV~RRIDIPIG CONSfDERATIONS
-13- f'C94-tt3
THE ANA.EIEIM RFSORT SPECIF[C PLAN - EiR A~313
ST.ATEMENT OF' FINDINGS AND FACTS AND
STA'CEAiENT dF OVERRIDING C~JNSi1JERATIONS
THE ~~'OLI/DWING PROPUSTD STATEMENC (~F FiNDINGS ANU FACTS A1~D
STATEl1~ENT' OF OV~REt~ING CONSiDERA'd'IUNS FOQ 1'HE AWAHEIM RFSURI'
EIR NO. 313 WILL BE REVISEU AS ~1PPRQPRIAZ'E TO REFLECT FYIDENCIE
PRESFh'TED DURING THE PUBILIC HEAItd1ViG PROCESS, PROJEI.'7C
REFINEMEMI'S, 6~COMMENDA1fIONS OF Tf1E PLANMYG COMMISSION AIYD
TWF. ~'INAi. A(.'T.ION~ TAKEN 13Y 11iF C[TY COUNCIL. THE DOClJMENT
REI~LECTS MITIGATION MEASUItES S'U11SI'ANT[AI.LY AS THEY APPEARF.D 1N
'fHF D[tAl'I' GNVIROP(1b~El-1TAL IMPAC'f ~tls'P~FtT AND WiLL RE REVISEU 1'O
REF'LECT 'L'f~ FqVAI. MITIGAT[ON MOMTORING PLAN ADQ)PTED BY TF~E
CITY COUNCIL.
-I i- i'1:9.1-1 l.i
TABI.E OF CONTENT5
,~C~LIQO
f ~C@
1.0 DFSCRIPI'ION OF CEQA fiNUINGS AND STATEMCNT
OF OVE'sRRIDING CONSIDCRATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2.0 C{TY COUNC[L CERTIrICATION OF FINAL E(It
AP(ll /~.DOPTION OF FINDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z
3.0 EF~~CTS DE7'ERM-NED 'CO BE NOT SiG[~fiFICANT Oi~
hiTl'IGA'fED TO A LNSS THAN S{GMF[CANT LEVEL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1 Land Use-Relatecl Plans and Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2 Laiid Use Compacibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.3 Transpurtation aud Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.4 Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l2
3.5 Noise .......................................... l7
3.6 Earth Resources-Geology, Soils, ar~d Seismicity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.7 G-•oundwater and Surface Hydrology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.8 Empioyment, Fopulation, and f~iou~ing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.9 I~ublic Servic~.~ and Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.9.1 Fire Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.9.2 Police Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.9.3 Solid Wast~ Disposal Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.9.4 Parks ..................................... 31
3.9,5 Schnots ................................... 3i
3.9.6 Water Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 ,
3.9.7 Wastewater/3ewcr Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.9.$ Sturm Drains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 ~
3.9,9 Electricity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3.9.IU Natural Gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4l
1.9.11 Telephcme Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
3.9.1'l Television Service/Reception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
~
3.10 Hazardc>us Material~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
3.l! Visual Resources and Aesthetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
3.12 Cuitura! Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
3.13 Energy ................ ....................... 4$
3.14 Constnutian Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4.0 UNAVOIDAE3LC SIGNfrICAN'T IMPACPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4.l LanJ Us~-RclatcxJ Plans and Palicies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4.2 Land Uxe Cump.itiLility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S2
4.3 Trans~rtaticrn auJ Circulatiun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
4.4 Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SA
4.5 Nois~ ........................................ 55
4.6 Sc~liJ W;~ste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
1:1pOC313F1V I ~AUM..~L: ~J I ' I'
..I:~- PC~1~1-11 i
TABLE UF~ CU~I'T'rNTS (amtinu~cl)
~
4.7 Schools ........................................ 56
4.8 Visual Resources and Aesthetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
4.9 Construction Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
5.0 ALTERNATIVES TO 1'HE PROJEGT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
S.l lVo-Project/Continuing Develcipment Alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
5.2 Moditieci l,and Use Alternativt (Hotel Circle) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G2
5.3 Disneyland Rc>,sort Land Use Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
5.4 Low~r lntensity Land 'Jse Alternative A: Year 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
5.5 Low~r Intensity Land Use Alternativ~ D: Ye:tr 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
6.0 FiNDINGS REGARD[NG OTHER CCQA CONS[DERA'E'[ONS . . . . . . . . . G8
6.1 Rrlationship Detween Local Short-Term Uses of the
Environment and tl~e Maintenance and Enhancement af
Long-Term Prociuctivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
6.2 Significant Irr~versible Environmental Change.s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
6.3 Growth-Inducing Impacts of the Proposed Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
7.0 STATEMIENT OF OVI:~tR1DING CONS[DERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ l
7.1 Incre.~sed Revenues tiir City, County, and State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
7.2 Enhancemenc of Tuurism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
7.~ Provision of Visual Amenities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
7.a Provision for NeeJect InFrast~ucture (mprovements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
7.5 E~ihancement of Commarcial-Recreation Area Synergy . . . . . . . . . . . 73
7.6 Ennancement of the Prdestrian Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
7.7 Streamlin~d Entitlement Proc~cl~ •e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
7.$ Enhancement anJ Maiotenance of Anaheim's Position as a
World-Cla.es 1'ourist Destination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
79 Facilitation and lmplement~tion of th~ General Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
7.1U Ueterrence of Negative [mpacts uf the No-Project/Continuing ~
Development Alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7G ~
1:\WC3~SECL110~fMAUM AZl'~~1 'II'
-1(,- I'C'.)4 - l I 3
TNLMAR.Y OF FINDINGS FOR
CA~~i iMP~CT ANALY~ED IN EIR NO. ~13
I=ire Prdtection ~
Police Services x
Solid Wsste Dispos.ll _X X X
Parks X
Schools X _ X x
Water Service X
Wastewater/Sewer Service X _
Storm Drains X
Electricity _ X
Natural Gas Service X
'Telephone Service X _ -
'I'elevision Service/Rec~ption X
Hazardous Materials X
Visual Resources w X X X
Cultural Resources x
~ncrBY X
Construction Impacts x x x
r~nocfiwn+rv~nu~nun.r.m - l7- ~'(;')~l- l ! ~
TNE ANAHEIM l2L:SORT SPEC[FIC PL~IN -~fR ~ 3l3
STA1'GMEN'I' O~ FINDINGS AND FACI'S ANa
STA7'EMENT OF G~V~RRIDTNG CONS(DEItA'Y7UNS
1.0 UF..SCR(PT(ON OF_ CEOA F DiN ~S ~7 STATEMLNT OF OV~RRfO1N .
CONS~ AR TION~
1.1 California ~nvimnmental , i~Q,~. The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")
(Public Resources Code Sections 2 1000-2 1 178.1) ancl tht State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code of
Regulations, Title l4, Sections I5000•15387) require diat specitic tindir.gs be made if a lead agzncy
de~idt;s to approve a project which will hav~ signitican! impacts. Section 21081 of the California Pub{ic
Resources C~de states:
"(N]o public agency shall anprove or carry out a project fur which an environmental impact
report has been certitied which identities one or more signiticant efl'ects on the environment that
would occur if the projece is approved or carried out unless the public agency malces one or
more of the fi~llowing tindings:
(a) Changes or alterations liave been required in, or incorporatecl into, ttin p;~ject which
mitigate or avoid the si~niticant effects on th~ environment,
(h) Those changes or altarations are wEthin th~ responsibility ~.,, jurisdiction of anoth~r
public agencu and have been, or can and should he, adopted by that other agency.
(c) Specitic econc~mic, I~gal, social, technological, or other considerations, including
considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for high~y trained workers,
make infeasible th~; mitigation measur~s or ~Iterna!ives identitiecl in the environmental
impact report."
The Environmental Impact Re~ort ("ElR") f~r tha Anaheim Rescrt Specitic Plan (~IR No. 313,
State Cle:uinghous~ No. 910910b2) identities signiticant ur potentially sibnificant environrtieuta~ impacts
which, prior to mi;igation, may occur as a result of adoptior~ and implem~ntation of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan ("f'roject") (Secti~n 2.J of the EIR contains a detailed description of the Project). Thus,
in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Anah~im hereby
adopts thesc findings.
The C~QA Guic~elines alsu state that the decision maker must balance the ben~fits of a proposec!
project agains- its unavoi~lable environmental risks in determining whether to approve tha project (Cal.
Code of Regulations, ': itle 14, 3~ction 15093). The Anaheim City Council has carefully considered the
i:~oxs~tF~~•na~onuui.~.nur.i -1-
-18- f'C9h-113
b~netits c>f the Project, The an.iheim Resurt CIR id~ntities signiticant environmental ~ffects which will
not be mitigatul to below a level ot signiticance an~l which will be alluweJ to occur by approval of the
Project. Ther~fore, thc; An:thcim Ciry Council hereby adopts the stat~ment of overriding considerations
containeci in this document, which states the specitic reasons that the benefits of the proposecf Project
uutweigh the unavoictuble adverse environmental effects, and that the unavoidable environment~l effects
are considered ~ccepcable.
2.0 C~1[COUNCR. C~R'Y'fFICA't'fON UF FINAL ENVirtf,~NMBNTpI. fMpACT REPORT AND
AQOPTION ~F FINUINGS
'I'he Anaheim City Council hereby certities the Final EIR. Ei~sed upon aubstantial ~vidence in
the record of administrative proceedings, the City Council of the City of A.naheim tinds and declares as
follows:
2.1 The City of Anaheim is th~ "lead a~ency" fi~r the Project. The Final EIR has been completed
in compliance with CEQA, the Stttt~ CEQA Guideline~, and th~ City of Anaheirn Guidelines for
the Implementation of CEQA.
The Draft EIR was circulated for public review and comment for a 45-day period commencing
]une I5, !994 and continuing through July 29, 1994. The Final EIR, including written
responses to public: comments rac~ived durin~ th~ 45-dr~y period, was made availa6le for public
r~view on August 19, 1994. On __, 1994, the City of Anaheim Planning
Commission held a public hearing on the Project and adopted Resolution No. PC~,
recommending approval ~f the Anuheim Resort Specitic Flan, certificati~~n of the F[R, adoption
of tht;se Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding Considerations, ~nd adopti~~t of th~
Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared in ccmnectiun ther~with.
2.2 The Final ~IR was presented t~ the Ciry Council, and the City Council has reviewed and
r.onsidered the information contained in tl~e Final EIR prior to a~proving the I'roject. In additiun
to reviewing and considering the text ot the Draft ETR and the Final E(R, the City Cnuncil
reviewecl and cansidered the rec~~rd of proceedings beFore the Planning Commission cunc~rning
the Project and the EIR, and all aral and written cumments concerning the Project and the EIR
receivui by the City of Anaheim during and prior to tha City Council m~eting at which these
findings were adopted. Except to the extent they contlict with the tindings and determinations
set fortl~ in this dc~cument, the anafysis ancl conclusions of the EIR, including but nc,t limited to
the responsts to comments, are incorporateJ herein by this refer~nce, and are hereby adoptecl
as findings uf tt~~ City Cann..il.
2.3 Botli th~ Draft E(R and thc Final E(R r~tle~t ~he independent judgment uf the City Cuuncil.
I:\pp('S~SU' 11~tON0MADM.A'L:Nt '«'
-1~)- ~~~.Jd-I1J
2.4 All feasible mitigation measures tbr the Pruj~ct have hcen impused, Each of th~ mitigation
m~asures, conditiuns of ~pproval a~d oth~r exactions to be impos~d un devel~pment under the
A.naheim Resort Specitic P;an is reas~siably related tu and proportional to the incremental
impacts and burdens created by the subje;ct development.
2.5 Documents constituting the recnrd of prcceeclings on which app~oval of the Project and
cartification of the E[R are based are available at the City oti Anaheim Planning Department, 200
S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, Calit'orniz.
3A EFFECI'S DFTERMTNF'Ll TO DE ~ SIGNTFI~NT OR MITIGA:1'ED T'O A LESS'1'IiAJy
SfGiVCF~iGA1v'C 4~Y~
This Section 3.0 contains tindings and supporting analysis concerrting effects on the environment
which have b~en determined to be not signiticant or which have been mitigated to a less than significant
level. Impacts which could remain ~igniticant even with implement^.~un of the mitigation measures are
discussecl in detAil in Section h.0 af this ducument.
Except as expressly providecJ to the contrary in chis document, all effects of the Project on the
environment ar~ hereby found by the City of Anahaim to be not signiticant, b~th 11ane ~nd in
combination with the ePfects of other related projects.
3.1 i„~d c_ Rela ~ Plan~, . nd P~,Ij,~e~
3.1.1 Potential Si~nificant Trt~p~~. The ~roject's potential land use impacts relatecl to plans and
policies are discusstd in Section 3.1 of tha EiR. Cumulative lancl use impacts related to plans and
policies are discussed in Section 4.1 of the E[R. Implementation of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
could result in pro,ject-specitic and cumulative signiticant impacts related to h~ture development of the
56 acres of land designated as prime agricultural land by the California Department of Conservation, as
discussed in Section 4.0 of these Findings, 'fhere are no c,ther sig~ificant impacts to land us~-related
plans and policies.
3.1.2 Findines. All signiticant impacts assuciated with land use-related plans and polices have been
mitigated to a less than signiticant level except ti~r the potential loss of prime agricultural parcels due to
dev~lupment. Except for the loss qf prime ;;gricultural land, changes or• alterations have been requirr~l
in, or incorporateci into, the Project which mitigate or avoid tf~e signiticant eff~cts on ~he environment
relating to land use-related nlans and ~?olicies,
3.1.3 Fa ~ ir~,~i~rt of Findir~g~. The di~cussic~n an~ analysis in Sections 3.l and 4. l of th~ EIR
provide facts and analysis to support the foregoing tindings and conclusions. As discussed i~i more df.tail
I:\D(A;315EC1~t 10YO~MADAl.AZC~ ~ { '~'
_~O_ E~~.~~~-11 J
therain, the An~~heim Rc;sort 5pecitic Plan will alli~w fnr the devel~ipm~nt uf land uses which are
consistent with the existing Commercial Rtcreation designation ti~r the aren in the City of Anah~im
General ~lan.
As discussul in greater detail in the GiR and in Sectlon 6.0 of the A~aheim Resort Sper,ific Plan,
the Pro~ect is consistent with the goals, policies, and ohjectives of th~ City of Anaheim General Plan.
Amendments to the General P:an (including the Circulatiun Element and the Environment~l Resource and
Conseicvation Element) and the City of Anaheim Zoning Ordinance are being prucessed together with the
Specitic Plan in order to maintain consisten~y betw~en the Specitic Plan and the General Plan; however,
no significant impacts (other than th~ loss of prime agricultural land) are anticipated as a re~ult of the
amendments,
Implementation of the following mitigation measure will serve to lessen or avoid pruject impacts,
and the potential effects (o[her dian the loss of ~xime agricultural land) will be reciucecl to a level that is
I~ss than significant.
itigation Measure 3.1-1: Prior to approval of eact~ Final Site Plan, Final Site Plans will be
reviewed for future devclopments within the An~-fieim Re~ art Specitic Plan Area for cunsistency
with the Specific Plan.
By providiny enhanced l~ndscaping, street, signage anrl other infrastnicture improvements
pursuant to the Project mitigation measures and the Public Facilities Plan in the Anahaim Resort Specific
Plan, while accommodating future hotelhnotel, convention center and related developme-u, the Project
will be complementary to development in adj~cent areas under tlie T~isneylan~ Resort Specific Plan and
the Hotel Circle Specific Plan.
Consistency with other City, Cuunty, re~ional, and State plans and policies is ~iiscussecl in
Sections 3.1 and 4.1 of the E[R.
The unavuidabla significant impact of the poiential loss of 56-acres of prime agricultural lands
is discussed in Sec-ion 4.1 below in this dorument.
3.2 ~~d llse ompatibilitv
3.2.1 N~ten i~,l Significant Im~,~. The Project's potential land use compatibility impacu are
discussed in Section 3.2 oF the E1R. Cumulutive lan~ use ce~mpatibility impacts ara discussed in Section
4.2 of the EIR. Significant Project and cumulative impacts are id~:ntitieJ related to die juxtaposition and
proximity of cc~mmercial and residential uses. Tha loss of primr: agricultucal land within the Specitic Plan
area (56 a~res) is a signiticant Project im~act, and could, tobether with develc~pment und~r the Disneyland
Resort Specific Plan, contribute to a cumulative loss of 30 acres of prime land in agricultural prciduction.
t:~oc~cs~s~c.,.tweon~noM.~z~:r+i -4-
_~~ _ E'C94-113
Long-term cumulativa constructiun impacts on lana usc ar~ cunsidered signiticant du~ the adjacency of
existing residences to development sites within thu Specitic Plan area. No uther signiticant impacts will
occur as a result of implementation of the Project.
3.2.2 Finclines. All signiticant impacts associated with land use compalibility have been mitigated to
a less than significant level except for the following: (i} juxtaposition ancl proximicy of commercial and
residantial land uses; (ii) loss of prime agricultural land; and (iii) ?rojecl and cumulative construction
impacts on adjacent land u~es, Except as to the unavoidably signiticantlmpacts noted in the previous
sentence, cbanges or alterations hav~ been requirecl in, or incorporat~d into, the Project which mitigate
or avoid tha significant efftcts on the environment relating to land use cnmpatibility.
3.2.3 ~,~j~.~~.r~,F FirdinLS. 'Ch~ discussion and analysis in 5ections 3.2 an~ 4.2 oF the E[R
provide fac~s ~nd a~alysis to support the foragoing tindings and concluslons.
Land use restrictions, sc;cbacks, landscaping and other development standards and design
guidelines set forth in the Anaheim Resort Specitic Pl;in, together with the existing Commercial
Recreation Area Maximum Pern-itted Structural Height Ordinance, will mitigate many of the I~nd use
compatibility impacts. ln most cases, the proposed Zoning and Site Devela~ment Standards and Design
Guidelines in the Anaheim Reson Specitic Plan, incluQinb but not limited-o the Anaheim Resort Identity
Program, Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscaping Program, and Anaheim Resort Nonconforming
Signage Program, will have a beneticial impact on adj~~cent properties because of the resulting upgrade
in the appearance af the streetscape.
Implementation of Mitigation Meas--re 3.1-1 (sce Section 3,1,3 above in this document) will
serve to lessen or ~void the land use cumpatibility im~acts.
Land use compatibility impacts resulting frc~m construction nc~lvicies are discussul in greater
detail in Section 3.14 below in this document.
The unavoidable land use compatibility impacts identitied in Section ~.2.2 above are discussed
in greater detail in Section 4.2 below in this document.
3.3 ~'r~ry~,{Qrtatian and Girculation
3.3.1 ~gt~ntial ~nificant Jmnacts. The project-speritic and cumulative impacts of the Project on
transportation and circ:ulation are discussed in Sections :s.3 and 4.3 of ehe FIR. L~evelopment under the
Anaheim Resort Specitic; Plan will result in increased tral'tic volumes bolh within and outside the Specific
Plan area. Without implementation of additiunal circulation improvem~nls and other mitigation measures,
the proj~ct-specitic and cumulativ~ impacts un vehicular traftic tlow would be si~nificant at numerous
locations. Inr,reasecl numbers of pe~lestrians crussing at the intersectionnf EIarbor Boulevlyd and Kateila
I:tDOI'SlSliC~~l\OYOAAADM.A'la'~~1 'S'
_•,?2_ FC9Q-tl3
Avenu~ cc-uld als~~ have a signiticant impact un tr~N'tic tl~~w at that int~rs~ctiun without additiunai
impruvements. The Jisruptiun anJ conbestiun uf streats anJ interstctiuns proelucul by canstruction
activities pursuant to the Speciti~ Plan and related pruje~ts wuuld be signiti~;ant. Nu uther signiticant
transponation and circulatiun impacts wuuld uccur.
3.3.2 Fj~¢jpprg. All ~ignificant impacts assuciat~l with transportatiun and circulation have been
mitigatul to a less than significant laval except ti~r the following:
A. Unavoidable significant Year 2010 impacts r:~ay occur at the following four intersections
even with completion of all feasible transportation and circula!ion improvements:
• l~arbor E3oulevard and I3all Road ~ Anaheim BIvd.IHaster Street and Katalla Avenue
~ H~.,ror St~eet and Orangewood Avenu~ • Lewi, Street ar.d Katella Avenue
B. ln the event that the transportati~m and circulation improvements identifiecl in the EIR,
including improvements which are psrt of Caltrans' I-5 wid~ning program or UCTA's Katellz Smart
Street program, are not completecl as anticipatc.~l in a tirnetahle cc~mmensurate with the paco of
development under the Anaheim Resort Specitic F'lan, then additional unavoidable significant impact4 on
levels of fervice at ;he stuJy intersections may resuit.
C. In the aggrega~e ovcr th~ IG-year bui:dnut period frcnn 1994-2U10, temporary disruptioo
and congestion ai s:reets and intersections r.~sulting from wnstruction of street improvements and
individual Je~el.~pment prc~jects will be signiti~ant and unav~~idahlc.
E,~cept as to tlie un•rvoidat~ly signitic~nt impactc noted ahove in this Section 3.3.2, ch3nges ur
alterations have been reyuirecl in, or incurp~-ratul inu~, th~ Pruject which mitigate ~ir avoid the si~nificant
effec~~ on the environm~nt relat'.ng t~- transportation anJ circulation.
3.3.3 ~~.'~-~t Supp~iuf findi~. 'ilic Jiscus~i~m xnJ anatysis in Sectinns 3.3 and 4.3 of the E1R
explain the foreboing findings ar~d crm~lu~iuns. S~:e Sectiun ~.I•'. of the EI{t for additional discussion
reYarding Jisn~ptinn and rnnyeatiun arising from ~~-nstructian activitiea. 'Che unavoidable significant
tranapurtatiun and circulation impacts identified in Secti~m 3.3.2 abrove are diccusseJ further in Section
4.3 below in this Jocumcnt.
The me~hoJulugy uxeJ in ~he EIR. prnvidez a c~-mhle~e and rer.umahie axse.v:ment ~7f future traffic
conJitions with an~ without devclc-pmcn~ u~Jcr ti~¢ A.nahcim pe«~rt Specifi~ Plan. Ba~at c~n Irip
generatian data ana{yzal My the Ciry's traftic c~mwl~anta, a ~ntal ~-f 3K intc:~ectiunti wiehin anJ uutxide
the Sp~cific Plan area wcre .elcct~~1 f~~r .~uJy.
i •cm-cus-~.rv~v.HUN ~ar.~ •!--
: ~_ 1`{'!11-11 t
~irst, rxisting levels u~ servi;~ at th~ 38 stu~y intersectiuns wero ~alculated. '1'wu intersections
(Walnut & Rall, An;theim & Ball) w~rc; determineJ tu h~ wnrse than th~ City's current operating standard
(LOS "E" along routes on the State Cungestiun Management Prob~am highway system anJ LOS "G"
along the bal~nce of arterials unJer Uie City's General Plan Circulation Eiument).
Second, luc~l and regional traftic gruwth prc~jc:ctiuns with anJ without development under the
Project werrs analyzed for the Years 200~ and 2010. Futu~e growth in non-Project, or "b~.tieline" trat~ic,
was projected and analyzed in urder to accurately assess th~ cumulativ~ and project-sp~cific impacts of
d~velopment under the Project. This is becaus~ develupment undc~ the Anaheim R~,~ort Speciti~: Plan
will not be die unly future contrihutor uf traftic to the study intersectiuns, The development of'relateci
projects in the vicinity, such as the Disneyland Rc~sort, as Well as other development in the City and the
regiun will also contribute increased traFtic to some or all uf the swdy int~rsection,.
71~e analysis of fut~re conditirn~s in the EIR examined conditions in both 20U0 a..~l 2010, in ocder
to con.cider impacts at two difterent stages ot Projact anJ "ha~eline" growth. 'The Year 2000 anaiysis
forecasGc impacts at a relatively early stage e~f Pn.ije~t builJout, where only about l,005 aduitional
hctel/mote! rooms have been built anJ openul orz rop of existing conditions. 'The Year 2(f10 analysls,
by contr~st, ~xamines .'uture intersection pr.rturmance when virtually all of the development whi~h eould
be perrniitcal under the Anaheim Rrs~~n S~~ecitic Plan has taken place (approximately 16,978 adduional
hotel/motel rooms anJ varic~us other develapm~nt was assumecl in the 2010 traffic anal~~sis -- se~ Ta~le
3.3-8 in tlie Uraft EIR). The Ycar 2010 analysis represents a reasonahle "worst case" sr,cnario with
respect to increas~,s irt traffc volum~.~ at the stuJy intenectiuns.
Transportation anJ circulation imrrovements which wil! maintain, to tt~e extent f~asible. adequate
levels of service through the year 2010 with huilJ~-ut :-t' th~ Anaheim Resort Specific Plan are d~:scribecl
in 'fables 3.3-2, 3.3-4 and 3.3-6 uf the GIR. Fven with thexe improvements, howevcr, aJequate icvels
of ~ervice will nut be m~intainuS in the year 201~ at the tii!luwing tiiur intersectioi~.c:
• Narbor ~oulevard anJ Dall RoaJ • Anahcim 81vd.INaucr Strect anJ Katella Avenue
• Ha~ter Street anJ l?rangewnad Avenuc ~ I.ewis Str~et anu Katella Avenuc
Many of the impruvements f~:ted ~-n 'f'ahlcs 3.3-2. 3.J-4 and 3.3-6 are needecl to mitiga~e
existing cunJitions and b:iseline gruwth with c~r withuut fun-re Jevclupment under du Anaheim Resort
Specifi~ Plan. A~::orJingly, it is anticipatcxl that VJfIl1Ut %{-Uf-:es ~if funding will he availahle far these
imprc~vement~, incluJing bixneyland Reu-rt rnicigati~m. ~~CTA's Katella 'Smart Street" ProXram,
(.altrans' I-S WiJenin~ rro~ram, anJ mitigatiunlimpact f~c~ imrx>,~~1 by thc Cicy on new Jevelupment.
Although the f~nding and timiny uf u~me of the~c funJirg s~~urce.~ are uncertain, the Pre~jcct miti~atinn
nte:~vtc.~ xet fnrth belc~w will all~~w thc City tu insurc thac develapmcnt undcr thc Ahahcim Res~M
Sprxific Plah doea nc~t autpace tbe implement~~ian uf acces~ary transpartati~~n ahcl circulatinn
impn-vementc, fmplemcntatitm af ~stiticicK in the City ~~f A7:~h~im Gen~~ral Plan Grovrth Managcmr:nl
1'I/lt'~~7F~['11'~~Y~Af/M A~l'~~1 •7•
`~t ''~•~~'~ ~ ~ ~ ;
El~ment will pr~.ivid~ additiun,u cuurdina!iun hetween the race ut' private d~val~ipment anJ the~ cumpletiun
of transportation and circulation improvementti, tt' th~ necessary improvements cannut feasihly b~
implemented in a timely fashion, then additiunal unavuiQahle signiticant impacts may result,
Except fur the; unavoidabl~ impacts discusseel in Sectiun a,3 beluw in this document,
implementation of the following mitigation measures will lessen or avoid Project and cumulative
vansport~tion and circulatiun impacts, anJ the putential effects will bc redurecl to a level that is less than
si6nificant.
m,j,~jy~tic n Measure ~,~: Priur ro the tirst finaf site plan approval (excluding signage plans),
the prepeny owner/Jevcloper of development farecast to gene~ate 100 or more peak huur trips,
as determinecf by the City Traftic and Transpurtation Manag~r utilizing Anaheim '('raffic
Analysis Model Tri~ Generation Rates, shall bc required tu pay the Ciry of Anaheim for all costs
assor,iated with updating the Ci:y of Anahcim Resc~rt Transportatiun Atodal to include the trips
associatecl with their pruposecl develupment. This muJel update will be usui to determine and
program d~~ c:xtent and phasing of impruvemrnts na~essary te~ acc~~mmodate the praposecl
development.
a. lf the moJcl demonstrates that tt~~ propusul Jeve~arment will cause an int~rsection to
operate at LOS E or worse, priur to the issuance uf whichever bui!Jing permit
necessitates an 'smprov~ment(s). the cunstruction :;mtract for said im~+r~wement(s? m~st
have been awarJed; and, prior to the tinal building ~nd zoning inspections for the
applicable builJing permit. thc impruven rnt(s) shall be accepted by the City. The extent
uf improvemen;.e requireJ for full huiW~-ut uf the Anahe~m Res~rrt are listed in Tables
3.3-2. 3.3-3 and 3.3-G of S~ctian 3.?, Tran~portation anu Circulation, ufi' EiR no. 313.
The property owner/developer.hall h~rve the uptiun to: (1) wait until th~ improveme~-t(s)
is construct~cf by otherx or, (2) cnnstruc:t ur pay thc actual total cost~ of thc
improvement(s) which shalt include the payme~t fur consultant/contra.«~r servi~:~.s for
preliminary and final engineering, soils analyRis, right•~if-way aeyuisition, demulition,
relncatiun, constnicti~~n arn1 insp~ctiun. an.l any other rel~teel expPr:es. 'She City
Enginecr may makc ~he d~tcrminati~~n ~hat Opciun (2) may ba waiv~l based on the status
and y~has~xt implementatiun ut the ~Ianned icnpr~~~~ement(s) anJ ba~ecl cm the supporting
environme~~tal analysis containrJ in EIFt !~'u. 313 ur in supplememal environmental
docum~ncati~-n.
'i'he City may ha~•e tNe abii~ry tu reimbursc tiir thc aJditional expense beyund the
pruprrty owncrlJevclnpcr's fair ~hare c~-n~rihutiun ~-f impr<~vement(s) baccd un the
ce~Ilectian uf' oth~r ar•r.nxpu~taei~m imrruvement Fees ur fur.Jing tf~:nuEh uUicr public
«-urtes. Naw¢ver, it' ;- r~~imhurscrn~nt ~~r Fair ~harc (t~~~6~am h~s nc-t been estahlish~tl
t ~wrsws~.iw~r.MUw ~c;.i •$-
,. ~_ !'(''1•t-l l.i
by th~ City, t~ sc extent that the property owner/d~velu~~er's costs excewl their "fair
share" cuntribution for said imprnvement(s), the property owner/devcloper may petition
the City Council to establish a reimbursament agreement or benefit district to inclade
other benefitin~ properties. AU cost5 associated with the establishment of any such
agreement/clistrict shall be at the expense of the property oviner/devaloper.
b. If the updatecl rnodcl demonstrates that LOS E wili ~ot be exceeded, no additional
transpurtation improvement(sl will be required of the propused devel~pment. In this
instance, the propeny owner/developer shall, prior to the issuance ot each building
permit, pay t~~ the City of Anaheim all applicable transportation f~es in an amount
det,.rminecl by City Council R;solution in effect ~t the time of issuance of the building
permit anrl participate in all appticabie r~imbursement or benefit distric-; which hxva
bee~ establishecl.
J~j,~atiun Measut~ 3.3-2, Fr6or to issuance of each building permit, apprnpriate Traffic Signal
Assessment Fces and Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees shall be paid by the propersy
uwner/developcr to the Ciry of Anatieim in amounts determineJ by the City Council Reso{utibn
in efftct at thc time of issuar,ce of Ihe building permit with crecfit given for City-authorized
improvertean~~ providec! by the property owner/developer; and, participate in all applicable
reirntursement or benefit districts which have betn establishecl.
iti~tion Measure 3.3-3. Prior to approval of the firss final subdivision map or issuance of the
frst building permit, whichever occurs first, the prnpscty owner/developer shall irrevoc:ably
uffer for ~eclication (with subordinati~n of easements), including necessary cons[ruMion
easements, the ultimate right(s)-of-way as shown in the Circ:ulation Element of thc An~heim
General Plan adjacent to tFeir pmpeny,
Mij~ion Mebs~e 3.3-4. Prior to final ouilriing and zoning inapection; and, onKoing during
project uperation, the property owner/developer shall join and financially participate in a clean
fuel shuttle program, if establishal; and, shall participate in thc Anaheim Transpoi~t~tion
Network/1'ranspoRation Management Association.
Miti¢ation Measurc 3~3.5. Prior tu issuance of gracling permic, the prupcrty uwner/Jevelopcr
shall ccwrdinate rideshare services for construction ~mployces with ihc Anaheim Tran.aponation
Network (ATN), and shall implcment ATN recornmenJations tu d~-, extent fcasihle,
~~ton Mca~use ~.~. For a hatcl or motel development in thc arra designatod Convcn~ion
Center Malium den.aity (see Cxhibit 3.3.3t, of the Specific Plan, "C-R District Develaumenc
Deitsity Plan"). which ex~~cwcfs 1(l0 rcwmt per gross acre, the property ~wneNJevelaper shall
cnte~ into an agreement with the City to the satisfaction of the City Traffic and Tran.cpr,rtation
I~.u~or:subc~.tW~o-w~uae.wu~~~ -9-
__l~_ I'(';l,t.. l I .1
Manager and Ciry Auurn~y's uftic~ tu im~ilcment'1'UM measures sufticient to reduce the actual
trip gcnerati~m t'ron~ the dev~lupment tu nu mure th;tn th~ trips assumed by the City's traffic
modai.
iti~ation M~ae 3•3.7. O~going daring construction, th~ Anaheim Police Department or
Anaheim Traffic Managerient Center (TMC:) personnel are reGuirecl to provide temporary traffic
control services, the property owner/dzvefoper shall reimburs~ th~ City, on a tairshare basis, if
applicable, tor reasonable costs associate~c! with such scrvices,
~itieation Meas~re 3.3-8. Prior to tinal building and zoning inspection; and, ongoing during
prajer.t operatiun, the properiy owner/developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive
Transportatiun Demand Managemenc (TDM ) program fur all employees. Objectives of th~ TUM
program shal! be:
~ Increas~ riclesharing and use uf :dternative transportation mudes hy guests.
• Provide a menu of wmmute alt~rnatives t~~r em~+loyees to reduce project-generated trips.
A menu uf 1'DM program strategies and el~ments ti~r bcith existing and future employee
commute options include, but are not limited to, the ti~llowing:
o Onsite 5ervice. Unsite services, such as the tiiod, retail anJ other services be providui.
• Ridesharing. A cumputer listing uf ail emplayee members be developul for the purpose
of ~nviding a"matching" of employees with other employees who livc in the same
geographic areas and who wul~ rideshare.
• 4anpooling, A c~imputer listing of aU ~mpluyees tor du; purpus~ of matching numbars
of employees who live iti gectigraphic pruximiry tu one another and could eomprise a
vanpo~~l.
• T~ansit Paas. S~uthern Califurni~ Rs-pid Transit District and nrange Counry
'1'rans~n~rtaticm Authcuity (inclu~!ing wmmuter rait) passes be promoteJ through financial
assistanc~~ and onsit~ sales to encuuragc ~mpl~~yc~ti to use the various transit and bus
services from thrc3ughnut the regiun.
• Commuter Bus, As ~ommuter "express" hus servic~ expanJs throughout th~ region,
passes 1'or usu un Q~ese lines may br pruvid~:cl ti~r employee; WhC Ch011tiC IO USC (Jlt3
servic~. Financia; incentives he pruvi~led.
• Shuttle Servic~. A cumputer listing ut' all empluy~es living in proximiry to the project
b~ generatrd, anJ a local shuttle program uff~red tn encourage employee5 to travel to
work by means od~er than the auu~muhil~.
o Bicycling. A Eii~ycling Prubram h~ d~vel~-p~~1 t~~ uffer •r bicycling alternativs to
emrlayees. 5ecure hicycle racks, I~~~k~rs, anJ shuw~rs he pruvided as part of this
i:mcx:s«ec~nrr~,~nM .~~i •~ •i -10-
, - I'(:'.~.1-1 l .i
progrun. Map, uf bicycte route.ti throughout the area be provideci to inform poteutial
bicyclists uf th~.tie options.
• Rental Car Fleet. r~ "fleet vchicle" program be developecl to provid~ employe~.c who
travel to work by means other than :tn automobile with access t~ automobile.s in case of
emargency medical appointments, etc. This servic~ wo~+ld help emplov~~.s use alcernative
modes uf transponation by ensuring that they would be able to liave personat
transportation in the event of special circumstances.
• Guuanteecl Ride Home Program. A program to provide employees who rideshe,•e, or
use transit or osher means of commuting to work, with a prear~ang~ ride home in a
taxi, rental car, shuttle, or uthec vehicle, in the ev~nt of emcrgencies during the work
shiR.
• Target Reducti~n of Lungest Commute Trip. An incentives program for ridesh~~ring ~-nd
other alternetive transportation modes to put highc:st priority on reductio-i of longest
em~loyee commute trips.
• "atagger shifts.
p Develop a"~ompressed work week" program, which provides for fewer work days but
longer daify shitts a.4 an option for employees.
• Explure the possibility of a"telecortsmuting" program tt,at would link some employees
via electronic means (e.s. computer with modem).
• Develop a parkin~ management program that provides incentives to those who ridrshare
or use transit means other than single-occupant auta to travel to work.
• Access. Preferential access to hiIIh occupancy vehicles and shuttles mey be pravidod.
• Financial Incentive for Ridesh~ring and/or Public Transit. (Cun•ently, Fecleral law
provides tax-free status for up to SGO per month per employee contributions to employees
who v~-npool or use public tra.~sit including co~nmuter rail and/or express bus pouls).
~ Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Emptoyees offered financial incentivt:,g for bicycling
to work.
• Special "Premium" for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Retiuction, 1'icketlpasse,4
to special events, vacations, etc. be offered to employaes who recru~t other employees
for vanpool, carpoul, or other trip reduction progran~s.
• Actively recruit prospECtive employees residing within a 3C-minute cur.tmute sh«:d.
• design incentive progr:ims for cupooling and uther aiternative trlnsportation moJ~ so
as to put highest prioricy on recluction of iongcst wmmute trips.
ln additiun to providing for the implementation of the fea~ible uansportatiun and circulation
irnprovements. the fnregoing mitigation measures act to reciuce traftic impacts by reclucing peak hour trip
generation from specific: devPlopment projects in the Anaheim Re.4ort Sn~cific Pla~~ area. This wili be
accomplishecl by, :unong other tl~ings, increaSing vehicle occupancies through rideshacing, vanpooling
and shuttle programs.
i:wxs.~nc+.iw~od.,~~u..~zc~.~ - l 1-
~ti- PC9•1_! l3
Putentially signiticant nnracts un Iev~l.r• ~~t service at Harhur Boul~:var~l unJ Katelia Av~nue due
tu incre~.secf pede~trian crossings will h~ reilucud tu a I~vel uf insigniticancc: with implementation uf the
propused right-turn lan~.c cm all .,rnr~~aches,
3.4 ir aliCv
3.4.1 Patentiai $a,~nificant_Im{~acts. The project-spacitic and cumulative impacts of the Project on air
c~uality are discussed in Sections 3.4 and 4.4 of the ~IR, The. following signiticant impacts could oacur:
p, Construction Eniissio~: W ithuut mitigatiun, peak day construction emissions assnciated
with development ~ander the Analieim Resort Specitic; Plan would exceed South Co~-st Air Quality
Management Uistrict (SCAQMD) thresholds for reactive ur~anic ga.ees (ROG), nit;ogen oxid~s (NOx),
carhon manoxide (CO), and tine paRi~ulate matter (PM10). Cumulativc constn~ction emissions from
development tmder the Project and related pcojects will b~ signiticant for sulfur uxidr.s (SOx) and fur all
of the f~reg~ing pollutants.
~• 4RS~tL22~~missions: Emissions i'rom motor vehicl~ travel associated with development
under the Anat~eim R~sort Specitic Plan would, ~irior tn n~itigation, exceed SCAQMD threshulds for
ROG, NOx, CO and PMlO. These aperational ~missions are regional in nature (i.e. contribute to
JeteriorateJ air quality in the South Coast Air IIasi~ as a whule); no signiticant loc;~lize~l air quality
impacts will oc:cur on a Pruject-specitic or cumulative hasis.
No other sigr.ificant air c~uality impacts would occur.
3.4.2 ,~p~,n,.p,g, All signiticant impacts assuciated with air qualiry have been miti~ated to a less than
signiticant I~vel except for the following:
A. Co,~ion Cmisaion~: Even with all feasihle mitig:~tion me:+sures, peak day
construction emissiuns on both a Project-specitic anJ cumulative basis are expectecl w exceecl SCAQMD
thresholds for ROG. NOz, CO, and PMIO. Cumulativ~ construction emissions of SOx may also be
unavoidably signiticant.
B. Ooeration Emi~sinns: Ev~n wiih all fe;-sihie cnitigation measures, emissions from mot~r
vehicle travel, utility usage, stationary suurces, anJ unsite service engines associateci with d~velopment
unJer the f+naheim Resort Speciti~: Plan are expecte~l tu exce~d SCAQMG diresholds for ROG, NOx,
~O auJ PM10, both on a Pr~~ject-specitic and cumulative hasis. These are imn~cts on regiunal air
yuality; no significant localizecl air yuality impacts will uccur.
i:,tkxsuF.c~•i~ar,ti+n~i.nu~.i - I ~.
_`,~_ f`('~)~1-113
Except as tu the una~uidably significant impacts nuted ,~h~rve in thi~; Sectiun 3.4.2, changes or
alterations have been requircd in, or incurpurated into, the Pruject which mitigatt ur avoid th~ signiticant
effects on the environment relating to air quality.
3.4.~ ~~~a in ~~oort of Findinas. The discussic~n and analysis in Sections 3.4 and 4.4 of the ElR
explain the foregoing findings and co-~clusions. See Section 3, l4 nf the EIR for additional discussion
regarding construction impacts. The unavoidablc; sigr~iticant air quality impacts identified in Section 3.4.2
above are discussecl fu~ther in ~ectian 4.4 b~lo~v in this document.
Ttie sig~iticanc: of air quality impacts is determined with refe:ence to criteria promulgated by
SCAQMD in its CEnA Air O-~ality H;tncl~iook. The following types of air quality im~sacts wer~
analyzed:
• Construction emissions (higitive dust, e~haust fror~~ construction equipment, etc.).
• Regional optratiunal emissiuns (contributiun of Qollutants to the South Coast Air Ba.ein
a.ti a n;sult of onsice activities, vehicular travel associated with the project, ste.).
• Lo~alized CO impar.ts from associated vehicular emissions.
• Air Quality Management °lan confu;mity.
• Cancer risk from toxic air contuminants.
Air quality impacts from constructi~~n activities are summarized in Tables 3.4-3 and 3.4-4 of the
EIR. The analysis shows that peak day construction impacts from development uncier the Anaheim ResoR
Specitic Plan will be signiticant, prior to mitigation, for all analyzed pollutants except SOx. When
combined with cunstruction emissions from relatecl projects, impacts are signiticant for all test~:
pnllutants. Althoubh implement~tian of the mitigation measures described below will recJuce thes~
construction impacts, they may still be signiticant after mitigation on both a Project-specitic and
cumulative basis.
Regional operational imp~cts ~re analyzed on pages 3.4-21 through 3.4-14 of the E[R. Operation
impacts will result from "mubile source" emissions (i.e. vehi~l~ tr~ps associated with development under
dr: Anaheim R~so-t Specific Plan xnd rrlated pruje~ts); SCAQMD regulations will insura that stationary
source (onsite equipment) and utility generation emissions do not increase as a result of the Project.
Mobile sourca emissic,ns are expected to exceed SCAQMD signiticance threshulcls ~n a Project-specific
and cumulative hasis prior to mitigxtion ti~r ROG, NOx, CO and PM I0. Even after mitigation, these
impacts are expected to remain signiticant.
(.~ix7Ct1.4f••CUl\OrriMDM.A'LC/~11 ' ~ 3'
-Jl)' ~~C~~1- 1 ~?i
Btcau:;~ ~~f its dispc;r~ai characteri~tics, whi~h create th~ putentiai for significam concr,~~tratioos
to accumulate on congested streets, a luculix~d xnalysis uf c.-rbun monoxide (CQ) ~missions was
performeci. Tables 3.4-G through 3.4-9 present the results of this analysis, which demonstrate that
localized carban monoxide impacts wiU not be signiticant, Th~ localizcd CO analysis is basecl on future
traffic flow assumptions in Years 2000 and 2010, and inclu~es the combined impacts of Project, baseline
and cumulative h•affc growth at die study intersections.
The Yroject conforms to thc; 1991 Air Quality Managemenc Plan (AQMP) approve~l by
SCAQMD and SCAG. C~nsiste~~t with AQMP requirements, the Project (i) will nut havc a Inng term
significant negativt implct on air quality as dei°ined by thc; AQ[v1P, (ii) incorporates land use,
transportation, and energy conservation control measures to mitigate ro the extenc pussible adverse air
quality ~mpacis, and (iii) has been analyzed for both local and r~gic.nal air quality impacts,
The maximum individual cancer risk resulting !'rom expoaure to toxic air contaminants from the
~Project and all related projects has been calculated to bt less than S~AQM~'s signiticance threshold of
one in one million.
Except for the unavoidahle impacts discusse~ in Section 4.4 bc~low in this document,
implementation of the following roitigatiun measures will lessen or avoid the signiticant air quality
impacts, and tha potential effects will be reduced to a level that is less than signiticant.
Miti,g~tion Measure 3.4-1. Ongoing during project op~ration, che property owner/developer shalf
implement measures to reduce emissions to th~ extent practicable, scheclul~ goods movements
for off-peak traftic hours, an~ use clean fuel for vehicles and other equi~~ment, ~s practicable.
~y,i,~'~~tion Me;~sure 3.4-2. Prior to the issuance of each building permit; and, ongoing during
construction, the pro~erry owner/developer shall submit evidence that low emission paints and
coatings are utilized in the design of buildings, in compliance with SCA(~MD regulations. This
information shall be clenoted on the project plans and spec:itications. The property uwner/
Jeveloper shall also implament tt-e fullowing to limit emissiuns from architectural coatings and
asphalt usagN:
a. Use nonsolvent-h~sed coatings on huilJings, wherever approp~iate.
b. Use solvent-based cuatings, where they~ are n~:c~ssary, in ways that minimize solvent
emissions.
c. Encourage us~ of high-suliQ or wa~er-haseJ cc~atings.
iaoocs~sec,NV11qMAAUM.A7.C/al - I 4'
_31_ PC:94-113
, f4~,iti~s~~ M~asure ~.4-3. Onguing Juring cuntitructiun, thr proparty owner/develope~ shall
implement measures tu rtduc~ constructiun-r~late~ ~~ir quality impacts, These measures shall
include, but are not limited tot
a. Nor-nal wetting proceclures (at least twice daily) or other dust palliative measures shall
be followeci cluring earth-moving operations to minimize fugitive dust emissions, in
campliance witt, the City of Ana~tieim Municipal Code includinb applica,ion of chemical
soil s¢abilizers ta ex~osed soi:s after grading is compieted and replacing ground cover in
disturbed areas as quickly as practicabie.
b. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approvul soil h9~ders, accordin$ ;
to manufacturer's specitication, to ezpuseJ srock piles. ,
c. Roadways aJjacent ro the pro;ect shall be swept and cleared of any spillecl export ,
materials at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust, and, haul routes shall
be clearecf as needul if spiils of materials c:xported from thv proiect site occur.
d. Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment shall be k~pt onsite when not in
operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with vehicles repetitiously entering
and exiting the project site.
e. Trucks importing or exporting soil mater:al and/or debris shall be covered prior to
entering public streets.
f. Taking preventive measures ~~~ ~nsure that trucks do not carry dirt on tires onto pubtic ~
streets, including treating onsita rnads and staging areas.
g. Preventing trucks from idling for longer dian 2 rninutrs.
h. Manually irrigate or actEvate i:rigation systems necessary to water and maintain the
vegetation as saon as planting is completed.
i. Recluc~ traffic speeils on all unpaved ruad surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less.
j. Suspend aU srading uperations when wind speed~ (as inscantan~us gusts) exceect 25
miles per hour and during tirst an~l second stage smog alerts.
k. Comply with SCAQMD Rula 4U2, which stat~s thctt no dust impacGs offsite are sufficient
to b~ ~,slled a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible emissions from
construction.
i:~ax sueamaoe,~noM.nu~. i - l 5-
_ ~,_ PC94-113
I. Usc low dmisswn mubile wnsh•uctiun cquipment (e,g„ tracturs, scr,ipers, dozers, etc.)
where practicahle.
m. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators rather than
tempurary power generators, whare nracticabl~.
n. Maintain construction equip-nent engines by keeping them properly :uned.
o. Clse lnw sulfi~r fuel for equipment, ta the extent practicable.
iti tio~ Measure 3.4-4: Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Expon) and prior
to the issuance of demolitio-~ permit (for Demolition Plan), the prope~ty ~wner/cleveloper shall ~
submit Dwmolition and ImportlF.xport Plans, if dctermined to be necessary by the Public Works!
Engineering Department, Traftic Engineering Division ard/or Maintenance Department. The
plans shall include id,~ntitication uf offsite locntions for materials export from the project and
options for disposal of excess macerial, These o~tions may include recycling of materials onsite,
sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale tu a project in the vicinity or transpoR to an
environmentally cle~red landtill, wich attempts made to move it within Orange Cot-nty. The
property owne~/developer shzll offer recyclable building materials, such as asphllt or concret~,
for sale or rtmoval by private tirms or public agencies for use in cons;ruction of other projects,
if not all can bs reused on project sit~.
M.IC~f.~~l~11 Mea~,,~.c 3.4-5. Prior w the issuance of each building permit, the property
owner/developer shall cumpiy with all SCAQMD offsNt regulations and implementation of Best
Available Control Technology (BACC) ancl Best Availahle Retrotit Control Technology
(BARCT) for 1ny new or moJiti~~d stationary source. Copies of permits shall be given to the
Planning Department.
'MiticatiQ.~r Measure 3.4-6. Priur to the issuance of each building permit, the property
owner/devwloper shall implement, and demonstrate to the City, rneasures th~t are being taken
to r.duce optratiun-related air quality impacts. These measures may include, but are not limited
to, the following:
1. Impruve therma; integrity uf structures and reduced thermal load through use of
~utomaced tim~ clocks or occupant sc:nsors.
2. (ncorpurate efficient heating and «thr,r appliances.
3. [ncc~rporate energy conservation measures in site urientatiun and in bui~ding design, such
as appropriate passiv~ sular design.
i:~oocsu~.noooa~noM.~zr.ni -16-
_;3_ PCJ4-113
- ~~~.
h. Use dro~ght-rw~stant landscaping wherever fcasible to reauc~ energy usccl in pumping
~nd transporting watcr.
S• Participate in marketing the existing Anaheim Telecenter (telecommuting/video
conferencing center) to guests in their hotels/busin~sses.
6. To the extent feasible, provide day care opportunities for ~mployees or p~rticipate in a
joint development daycaze r,enter.
3.S Noise
3.~.1 Potential ~6 -r~iPcarot I~p~~, 1'he project-specific a,~d cumulative impacts of the F~reject on
noise aze discussed in Sections 3.5 and 4.5 of the FIR. Noise from construction activities pursuant to
the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will be significant on a Project-specific and cumutative basis. On a
cumulative level, there will be noticeablr (3 dBA or more) increase,s in traffic noise along two street
segments in the t'~ear 200p ~nd along nine segments in the Year 20I0; vehicle trips associated with
development under the Anaheini Resort Specific .Plan will not be increa.secl at any locetion, Tire
squealing, car horns, car alarms, sweeper noise anu similar noise impacts from hotel parking stru~:tures
adjacent to noise-sensitive resiclential uses may be si~n.ificant widiout mitigation.
No other significant noise impacts wuuld occur.
3.5.2 Eindin~,. Ai( significant noise impacts have been mitigated to a~ less than significancleve! ex:,ept
fur the following:
A• ~onstrucS~~,qY j~g; Even with all feasible miti~ation measures, naise from constructiun
activities in and around the Specific Plan azea will be signifiaa~ii.
B. Operulionnl Nnis ; Noise from increased vehicul~r traffic a.4sociatetl with relatod
projects and background traffic growth in combination with the Project will be cumulatively and
unavoidably significant along two stceet segments ia the traffic scudy a~•ea in die Year 2000 and along nine
segmen~ in the Year 2010.
Except as to the unavoidably significant impacts noted above in this Section 3.5,2, changes or
alterations have been requiced in, or incorpocaied into, d~e Projec;t which mitigate or avoid the significant
effects on the environmen~ relating to noise.
3.5.3 Fncts n Supnort of Fipp~~j~g,g. The discussion and analysis in Sections 3.5 and 4,5 of the EIR
explain the foregoing findings and conclusions. See Section 3.14 of the EIR for additional discussion
i:~oocs~sec~awnnMaM.~zc~ri -17-
-3d- ~~C~4-113
nngardin~ constructiun impacG~. ('he unavoidatile significant noise impac„ identiFied in Section 3.5.2
abuve ar~ Jiscussecl furthcr in Section 4.5 bclow irt this document.
Nuise impacts associatal with impleme~uation of :he Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will result
from the construction and operation of individual development projects.
Constructiun activity in connaction with buildout under :he ~~ecific Plan is anticipatui to occur
over th~ 1G•year period hom 1994 through 2010, with the mejority of activity between 200(1 and 2010.
Con.etruction adjacent to any one losation, however, will be of shoi~ter duration (gene~ally siz mondis or
f @,45~.
In g~neral, noise levels will vary from 79 dSA to 88 dBA from 50 feat away during the erection
phase of construction. Maximum outda~r noise levels at residsnces I00 feet from the construction site
cuul~ be ac I~~gh as 85 dBA. This wil.l be an unavoidable significant impact.
OpcrAtion~l n4isc impacts will consist chiefly of increasai traftic nuisc from vehiclc trips
associatecl with development under the Specific Plan. Noise impaGta for the Proj~c:t were calculateJ by
applying the Ne~eral Highway Administrdtion'a Highway TraFtic Noise Praliction Moctel to the projectod
roadway segment t~at~ic volumes in Year 20q0 and 2010. The future t~aEfic v~~lumes include background
uaff': browth and related project trips ~ well as additional vips addecl by new development under the
Anaheim Resort Specific Flan. 'lT~e analysis praficts noticeable ~3 dBA ~ ~~nre) increates in tra~c noiae
a!org two street segments in the Year 20A0 and alon,g nfne segment~ ~:~c Ye;.r 20I0, althougb the
increasas will be largeiy due to growth in background traffic, and vehicle trip~ acsociated with
development under the Anaheim R~ort Specific Plan will cauae no mor~ tinan a 1 dBA increase at any
location. Project rwise impac~s tiom traf~ic ue not significant atter mitigati~n. 't'his cumulative traf~ic
~roise i~r~pact is _ignificant and unavoidable.
'the other ~tentialty-significant nuise i~npact cons~~ts of tirA ~quealing, car horns, car alsrm~.
sweeper nuis~ and similur noixe impa.~ts frum hotel parkinQ structure~ adjacent to ~o~se-sensitive
residential us~.~s. These im~acts will be rafacal to a levzl of insiQnificance with implementatiun of
Mi~igation Me.~cura~ 3.5-3. 3.3-6 and 3.5-7 aa torth below.
E~.ccpt for chP unavo~ lat-Ic impacta Jiscuasal in Section 4.5 bclow in thix documen!,
implementation of !he follcwing mitigation ~reuures will leasen ~r ~void ~he significant rx~ise impzcu,
~nc1 the potential effects will be teducal lo ~ le~•el th~t is IRSS ;han ~tgnificant.
Q~it;Gltj~IL~1~3ilit~,~.~(. ~Jn~oinQ du-in~ demolftiun. ~radin~ anJ cc~a~wctiun. noisc
gencratad by ~~nstruction utivity shzll be limi-ed by the prupetty cr.vner/develnper t~ tiU dBA
along the property t~ounduie~, befo~e 7:00 a.m. and ~Rer 7:44 p.m., a~ ~overnal by Chapter
6.~, Sound PceFSUre Lcvels, uf -he ~naheEm Municip~l Cafe.
1~ IMX i fPY'~1'OtMAt1M N.l'~11 ~~ O'
-,ti::- ~~~~~~•~-~ 1 .l
Miti~aciun Nte.~sure +„~~. Priur tu issu,-nc~ uf ~ach huilding permit, an 8-foot high perimeter
or purtahle const~ucti~ -~ barrier shall be pruviJed by the pruperty uwneNdevelop~:: along
buundari~,c uf eonstru..ion areas which hav~. noise-sensitive land us~ti adjacent to them to
minimize n~~~ise impacts.
jyj,',iiation Me;~.~,uce 3,~-3,. Onguing during construction, the pmpe-ty owner/developer shall
ensure that all interna! cumbusti~m engines an cunstn~ctiun equipment and trucks are tittec! with
properly maintainacl mufflers.
Mitie~tion Measure 3.5-4. Prior to th~ submittal of each final site plan, the property
owner/developcr shell submit a noise study prepared by ; certiticd acou4tical engineer to the
satisfaction uf the Building Division Managcr id~ntifying whather noise attenuarion is required
and Jefining the attenuation measures anJ specitic perfo:mance reyuirements, if warranted, to
comply with the Unifurm Buildinb Cu~la and SuunJ Press:~re (.evels Ordiaance. Ultimate noise
attenuatiun reyuirements, if any, shall depend un the tinal ~ocation of such buildings and noise-
sensitive uses insidc anJ surruunJin~ the huilJings. Attenuat.ion measures shall be implemented
by the properry owner/de~~eloper priur to tinal huilding and zoning inspections.
Mitigati~n Measure 3•.5.5. F'ri~ir to the i~suance ~if each builJing permit, for strucwres that are
adjacent to noise-sensitive uses such a.e residtnces, the property owneNdeieloper shall ensure
that all mechanical ventilatinn units are shown on plan+ anJ instal(ecl in compliance wi~h the
Suund ?r~5sure Levels Urdinance..
j~iYatic~n Mea.eure 3.5•6, Onguing during pruject c~peratio»s, engine noise from sweeping
eyuipment usexf in any parking t.'ICIII{Il'S IOC:IfC'lJ illlJacent tu residential .~rea.e shall be muftlai.
Mi i~, tion Meacu_ r~YS-7. Priur to isxuance ~-f each hwlding permit ~or a p:trlcing structure, the
prupe~ty owner/develcrper sh;dl en~urc that nuise frum parking str~~ctur~ aJjacent t~~ resicfential
areas will bc r~xluced hy the pn-visi~m ~~f cunvenient a~.cess tn parking facilities, scund
attenuetion devicea (i.e., louvers and wall~), the use uf teztureJ deck surfaces to rWuce tire
squeahng, anJ tiering to provide greater Jistancc t~~ thc ret~ptnr.
s.b ~b~~~•ra-l~gy. Suiis, and SS~4I'1l~.1lY
3.6.1 ~'~cntial Sienificant Im~acts. Thr project•sp~~:~tic ;~nd cumulativc impactx of thc Proje~t rclataf
to eanh resuurce.S are Jis~ass~f in Secti~mx J.(~ anJ 4.G of the EIR. Implementation of future
dc.wclopments within the Spa~ific F'lan area will cx~x~s~ p~tiip{c t~- pu~ential ,eismic risks, which arc rypical
throu~hcwt Califiirnia N•~ nthcr signifi~ant canh res~-urc~. impa:ts wc~ul-1 uccur
~ •ixK'~s•~i •-.~ a+rw~nuW ~~, •,n -1 q.
- ii, _ P(::).1-113
3,6.2 Pindinj;g. Ali signbti"~nt im~acts ;~ss~iciat~~l with carth resuurc~s ~bculugy, suils and scismicity)
hav~ been mitigated tu a less than signiti~:ant level. ~hanges ur alteratiuns hav~ becn r~yuired in, or
incorporateci into, thr„ Proj~ct which mitigate ur avuid the signiticant affects on the enviromnent r~latinq
to earth resources.
3.6.3 ,~~c.~.q in 5~q~rc of ~,~dines. The cliscussiurt and analysis in 5ections 3.6 and 4.0 of the EIR
explain the foregoing tindings and conclusiuns.
The Anaheim Resurt Specific Plan area is locatr,~f in a regian that maintains a Fentl~ grade of
twenty feet per mile; therefore, ground stability is ne~t a signiticant concern. Because ths earth materials
unJerlying the site are rclativety dense and the water table is deep, the potentia! ~or liquefaction is very
iow. No relevaat fault traces or Aiyuist-Priolo Special Stud;e.c 7.ones have been identifiecl; therefor~, the
potential foc ground rupture is nut a signiticant impact. Finafly, there is no potential for Gcunami or
seiche damage at the site and only a very remote pussihility uf carthquakc-induced tlooding.
Devtlopment under the Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan will expose pwpl~ to potential seismic
risks that are not unusually severe ~ompared ro general curiditiuns in Southern l.alifornia. With
implementation of the mitigation m:asures set ti~rth br•.I;iw, this impact is not significant.
Implementatiun ~f the fiillowing mitigation me~sures will le.csr.n eir a~oiJ any signiticant earth
~esources impacts, anJ the potential e;fects will he reJuc~d to a level that is less than significant.
Mitiyation Mea.a.ure 3•G_~. Prior tc~ appruvai uf each qrading plan. the pruperty owner/developer
shall submit to the Ciry Engincer for rcview anJ approval, a soils and ge~~lugical repon for the
area to bc gradecl, basecl nn priip~ised grading and prep.~red by an engineerine geologist and
gootechnical engineer. All graJing sha~l h~ in contiirmart~:e wuh Title 17 of the Anaheim
Munici~~al Code.
~~n Meaeu~r,r~~i-2. Priur t~i th~ issuan~c ot' each building permit, the pr~~perty
owner/Jevctopcr shalt ~uhmit fi~r revicw and approval, Jet~ileJ fuund:uian design inform~tion
for the subject builJinb(s), prepar~Kl hy a civil engir.e~r, b,.ul cm recommendations by a
geotechnical enginec-
iti~tion Measure 3.6•3. Priur t~~ isxuante ut' ~a~h tiwndaticm permit, thc property
~wner/Jevel~~per shatl submit a rcport prepareJ by a g~K-te~hnical engincer fi~r review and
;-ppruval which shall invu~tigat~ the suhj~ct t~~unJati~-n ~x.avaeiuns tu d~~ermine if saR layers
a~'e present imm~cliatcly Neneath th¢ tiN-tin~; xite anJ ti~ enxure that ~c~mpressihility duex not
underlie thc fix~ting.
i.,txr~.vri-na+~.w~n.~ ~.~.-,u •!0 -
_ ~- I'(;!11-1 l :i
~]jti6ati~~n Ntra~ure _i.G-4. Priur tu issuan~e ut' each I huil~ling permit, tlie propcrty
uwn~r/JevelupNr shall submit plans shuwing that th~ prupustd struccure has boan analyzed For
earthyuak~ luading and desibned acwrQing to the most recent seismic standards in the Uniform
Building Codc a,lupted by the Cit~~ of Anah~im.
~!~lCation Nieasure 3,6-5. Prior to tinal building anJ zoning inspections ti~r a hotelhnotel, the
property c~wner/developcr shall submit an eanhquakc response plan for review anJ approval.
The plan shall reyuir~ pustecf notices in all hutel rooms on earthquake safety proceJures and
incorporat~ or.boing earthquake training for hotel stat'-.
Miti~;;~tion Medgure 3,¢;~. Ongoing during grading activities, thc property owner/developer
shall implement standarJ practices for all sipplicable rndes ard ordinances to prevent erosion.
3.7 Groundwater and Surfacc Nyd~c Ic) 1LV
3.7.1 P_otenti;J Sie~cant Imp,~cl.4. 'i'he project-specitic and cumulative impacts ot' the Project un
groundwater anJ surfac~ hydrology are discussul in Se:ctiuns 3.7 and 4.7 ot'the 61R. Without existing
programs and P~oject mitigati~ n measures, significant impacts due to groundwater dtpletion ~nd
contam%natuf runoff cauld occur on a Prc-je~:t-speciti~ and cumulative basis. Stiort-term impacts from silt-
laden and cuntaminated runoff from construction sites u~uld also occur without mitigation. No other
significant gr~undwater and surface hyJrology impacts would occur.
3.7.2 ,~indinr~. All significant im~~acts aesuciated with gruundwater and surface hydr~logy have been
mitigated to a Icss than signiticant Ievel. Chcu~ges or alteratiuns have bcrn requ:rul in, ar incur{wrated
into, the Project which mitigate ur avoiJ the signiti~ant efforts un thr. environment relating to
grounJwater and surface hydrology.
3.7.3 Facts in Su~port of findin¢.t. Tt~c di~cu~~i~~n and analysis in Sections 3.'1 and 4.7 of rhz EIR
explain the f~~r~guing tindings and conclusions. See Secti~m 3.1~ uf the EIR for additiunal Jiscussion
regarding cun<truction impacts.
Develup~t;e~u under the Anah~im R~xurt Spccifi~ Plan wiU result in increas~xl water usage, 70
percent o~' which com~:x frnm lo~al gruunJwat~r. Cevclurment is alxo li~ely to rrsult in decreosaf
gruundwattr recharg~s pucentiat due tu tt-e paving uv~r uf agricultural tields :~nd othcr unpave,~1 areas.
't?~~,~~ effecG~ ~ill also uccur ~m a~.um~~lative ha~i~ with J~v~l~-pment uf r~latu! pruj~cts.
The Jeplctic~n uf groundwaler will nut be si~r~i!i:an~, hc-wever, aRcr imrtemcntation uf the
Proj~~ct mitigatiun mcagur¢~ anJ exis~int; drange C.~~unty Water Dixtrict (OCWD) grew~dwater
replenishm~at pmgrams. Mitigatiun mra.~u~~c incluJ~ th~ use uF effi~ient landxcaping irrigation
eyuipwr.i~t anJ thc provisiun uf' dual pipinb ~u that rc~laimed watcr ~au be us~~l fur irrigaticyn if ~nJ when
1 ~IMKT1Ci]~PU~7MAOM A71•'~1 '. I'
~ .111- ~~~.~1,1 - ~ ~ .1
- ~_~~~ .
;
it boci>mes availahle, Ttie Cny s ~xisting l.an~scar~ Watrr Etticiency Urdin,uic~ will reJu~~ landscaping
water clemand. Existing OCWD progr,uns include. the ~:uUc:ctiun ut' a water replenishment assNSSment fee
usul tu purchase suppl~monta! surfac~/imported wat~~r ti~r ~ruundwat~r ;echargc:.
Without mitigation, increased d~velupment undar th~ Projc:ct anJ relatecl projects could 3iso
result in incr~~.ses in silt-laden and cuntaminateci surface runoff following rain showers. Existing
pruvisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Eliminaciou System (NPDES) and the mitigation providecl
below will reduce these impacts to a level of insigniticance by rKducing th~ quantity of soil and
cuntaminants in surface rurtoff f~ov~.
lmplementation oti the following mitigation measur~s will lessen or avoid aoy signiticant ground
water and surt;~ce hydrology impacts, and the potential eft'ects will be reclucul to a level that is less than
significant.
Mitjyatinn Mea:~e,~,,7-1. Prior tu apprc~val ~-f the tirst grading plan or issuance of die first
building permit, whichever occurs tirst, the 7r~iperty owner/developer shall submit a M~.~ter
Drainage and Runuff Management Plan (MD{2MP) for rcview and approval by the Publi~
Wurks/F.ngineering Department, Devclupment Services Division and the O~ange County
Environmental Management A~ency. The Master Plan shall includ~, but not he limited to, the
following items:
a. Backbone storm Jrain layout and pipe size, including suppcrting hydrology ~nd hydraulic
calcufations for storms up tn ;{nd inclu~ling the l0U-year storm; and,
b. A clelineation of the improvementti tci h~ implemenxd ti~r control of project-generated
drainag~: and runoff.
~iti4atinn i~teasure 3.7;,~. Prior tc- appruval ~~f a grading plan, the pruperry owner/Jeveloper
shall s!ibmit fur reviaw ;ind apprcwal uf thc~ City Engineer, a JVater Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) specificatl,y iJentifying 9est Management Practicess (E3;~tPs) that will be used onsite to
contmi predictabte pollutant run-off. 1'his WQti1P shall identify the structural and non-structural
mPasure~.c specitieci in AppenJix 7 ut' ~he Cuu~ityw~ide IJrainage Arca Management Plan detailing
implementation of f3t~1Ps whenever th~y ar~ ;tppliu:-hl~ tu the pruject (when tha project h:~c a
b~low gra~le loading Jock, tiir exampl~): th~ assign~nent of fonb••term maintenance
respc~r~ibilitia~ (s~iecifyins th~ developer, parcel uwner, maintenanc~ acsociat~on, lessee, etc.);
•rnJ, shall referencP the fa~atinn(s} „t'stru~tur;~l [iMPs.
Miti~;~~iun Mcature 3.7-3. Priur tu :ipprc~val of a graJin~ plan u~ isxuanct of a demuli~iun
permit; anJ, ~lurinb ~l~aring, the pr~~rrrty uwner/Jev~lurer sha{I oht~in cc-v~rage under the
NPDES StatewiJe tnJustrial Stc~nnw:-t~r Pcrmit ti~r G~n~ral C~-nsttuttian Activiti~s from the
1:1pp(`j11fiL1~lYK1MAUM A7l':~I •.7.1 •
.1~~-
(~~~~.)~{-~ 1;
~~,~Arl~;~ ~ r~.~.- ~~,'~'~'.~' r~*~ y. i~~ ~ v
~.~ "' .. ~ ~ ~ 'r } , ~ ~
_ ~ ~~ . . .f .I ~ , ~ ~~te~.
State Water R~suurces Cuntrul E3uar~1. Evi~lence uf attainment shall be suhmittecl to the City
Enginecr,
itiy;aticm Me:asur~ 3.7-4. Ongoing durin~ proje~t operations, th~ property owner/developcr
shall provid~ for the following: cleaning of all ~~~-ved areas not maintained by the City of
Anah~im on a monthly basis, incluJing, hut not limited to, privatz streets and parking lots, 'I'he
use of water to clean streets, paved areas, parking lots, and oth~r areas and flushing thc: debris
an~l seJiment down the sto~m drains sha11 he pmhihited,
,MjSj~;l.Lji1LM~;ts-ire ~, 7~. Prior to e~ch tinal builJing and zoning ir.spection, the property
owner/developer shall submit a letter from a licensed landscape architect to the City, certifying
that the landscape installation anJ irrigation systems hav~ heen installed as specifiecl in th~
approved landscapin~ and irrigation plans,
Mitieat•~_~n Measure 3~. Prior tu final buil~in~ and wning insp~ction, the propeRy
owner/developNr shall install piping nnsite with project water mains so that reclaimed water may
be used for landscapr, irrigatiun, it' and when it becumes .wailable from tht Counry Sanitation
Uis;rict of Orange County.
3.8 ~mulovmer~l..Ps.Dl~llLis2P~~{sl~l5lt~
3.8.1 potenti~l 3ienificant Imnacts. 'The pruject-spccitic and ~umuiative impacts of the Project on
employm~nt, population and housing are Jiscusse~ in Sectiuns 3.R and 4.8 uf the CIIt. No significant
imp.t~ts are anticipaced.
3.8.2 Findines. Th~ environm~ntal effects rel;itecl to empluyment, populatiun, and housir~g heve 6een
determined w b~ less than si~;nitican!. No mitigation me~.~ures are required.
3.8.3 ~,cts in Su~port uf Findin¢s. The discussion and analysis in Se~t~o~s 3.4 anJ 4.~t of the EIR
explain the foregoing finJings and conclusiuns. See Section 3,14 of the EIR for additionai discussion
regar:iing ~:onstruction impacts.
Nu significant effe~ts iin tho environment relateJ tu emple~ym~nt, pnpulation or housing .vill
c~~cw•. Exc~pt ta the excrnt they ultimately Irad tu aJverse rhysical changes in the envirunment, social
and econumic impar.ts are out~icle the purview uf C~QA. 'fhe EIR ncvertheless presents an analy~'.; af
employment, pupulatior and housing irn~acts tu highlight beneticial aspects of the Fr~ject, anJ to cuntirm
that the impacts ara within the r~nges ti~recasted hy regic~n~l gruwch plans and projectiuns anJ to aiJ
decisi~nmakcrs in lor.a: planning.
i:uxxs~trr,.~~o.ons,~uM.~ia•u~ .?;.
I'C9S-Li3
Approximately 18, l i.f new .juhs are antici~iat~~l tu he cre;ireJ in cunne;ct:on with hot~l/mutel
dev~lopment under tha An,t)~eim Resurt Specific Plan thruugh the ye;ir 2010. This reprN~ents 399~ of the
total empl~yment growth projected by SCAG tc~ occur in th~ City nf Anaheim during the period 1990-
2010, and 1096 ot the projc:ctul growth for the Northwcst Orange Cuunty Sulyregion during the same
period. This represents a benefici;~l social and econ~~mic impact on the City a~i~! Phe Subreginn.
Combined with employment generated by the related projects, cumulative job creation would be
approxirnatcly 77,238. This is wcll within tt~e I~90•20U0 job g;owth projected for Ghe Subregion by
SCAG.
To the extent workers in the new jobs cume frum ~.~tside the City and d~cid~ to move to the City
in order to be closer t~ their place of employment, die City's ropulation may increase as an indirect result
<~f the P-•oject. Bicecl on a survey uf hote! wc~rkers conducted for the pisneyland Resort project, it ~s
escimatec! diat approximately 13,3 p~rcent of new hut~l and m~~te! ~vurkers wo;ild choose ro relocate into
die City. Applying this percentage ro the 18,113 new hotel/motel Jobs anticipatecJ within the Anaheim
RP.sort Specitic Plan area throu~h Year ?010 yields an increase of 2,409 new households in the City, and
a population increase of 7,468 (assuming and averag~ of 3. I pcru,ns per household). This popuiation
and l~ousing growth is well within SC:AG's projections far future housing unit and population growth
projections within the City and th~ Subregiun ti~r the periu~ 199Q-20I0.
The Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan ~lues not permit the construction ~7f additional housing units;
therefure, there will be no direct housing impacts.
Cumul~tive pc~pulatiun grc~wth anu housing de~nand associated wEth the Project and related
projects will be well within the 1990-2010 gruwth prc,je::tec! by SCAG (i.e. 39,298 new pupulati~m for
Anaheim and 105, I I6 for the Suhregiun; 2G.241 new housing unics ti~r Anahcim and IU5,708 units for
the Subregio~~).
Existing City policies and the activities c-f the City of Anaheim Housing Authority provide for
the hc,usictg nee~ls ot the City, No mitigation measur~s are providecl, because no signiticant impacts on
the provision ut nec~ssary levels of housing are anticipated. The City's housing ner~ls for aU income
levels are accammodated through the p;ugrams and pulicies uf the General Plan Housin~ ~lement, which
by law is reviewed and updated approximately ~very 5 year, based upon huusin6 prct~luction cargets set
by SCAG. The next programmed General Plan H~~using Element update is ~checlului for July l996.
i:~uncs~sv'.•.+iwew~nnM.n•rri,~ .~,~..
-41- !'(:J•S-i l:i
s.9 PI~,~I.IC~CRVrcr•.5 nN.~c,~LIT~1:S
3.9.1 Nirs Prottx.Kitm
3.9.1.1 ,(~ '• '~m'~j,~p~. The project-specitic and cumulative impacts ~~f the Project on tire
protection are discussed in Sectiuns 3.9.1 and 4,9.1 of th~ EIR.
If no additional manpower, facilities, equipment c.~r other improvemants are implernented,
development under the an~-heim Resort Specitic f'lan, b~~di alone ~inu ir, conjunction with developrnent
of relatec! pr~jects, would create signiticanc tir~ protectiun impacts consisting of: (i) a sttiortage of plan
check and t7re inspecticm personn~ I; (ii) degraded emergency vehicle responsa times; (iii) inadequate
service call manpuwer, ~yuipment and faciiities; and (iv) inadequate cata~trophic event equipment.
N~~ other signifcant tiro protection impacts w~~ul~l occur.
3.4.1.2 Ej,p,~~, All signiticant impacts assuciated witii tire protection have been mitigated to a less
than siqnificant level. Changr•s or alterations have heen req4ired in, or incorporated into, the Project
which mitigate or avoid the si~niticant effects on the environment r~lating to tire protectian.
3.9.1.3 ~s,Kg in Supnort of i'indinas. The discussi~m and analysis in Sections 3.9.1 and 4.9.1 of the EIR
explain the foregoing tindings ancl conclusions.
Additional services from the Anaheim Fire Department will be requi~ed ro provide necessary
plan check and fire preventinn inspection ti~r development under the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and
relatecl projects. Plan check fees will ccwer the cust o~ the plan check strvices, and additional fire
inspectors will ba fundeJ as neu~ad from tax pruce~ds assuciate~l with the incremental development.
Although emergency vehicle rc;spunse times could, without mitigation, be degrade~ because of
Project-specitic and cumulative traftic increases, the mitigation and trattic improvement proRrams
discussed in Section 3.3 of th~ ElR will mainwin adequate resnons~ times.
Development under the proje~:t is expected to pruJuce an increase uf 60 annual tire anJ rescuc
ur,rvice calls in th~~ Year 2000 and an i~cr~ase e~f 97G servi~~ ~ttlls (which ~° a~~54~ incr~ase over existing
annu~l calls) by the year 2010. Cumulative increases with Jc~velc~pment under the Project and relatec!
prujects are expectud tu be 409'0 ovc;r existing calls by ?OGO and a IU03'o increase by 2U10. fire
personnel needed to accommodat~ the estimat~d increas~ in calls ;vill be funded through tax ~+rc,cec~Js
assUCiateu with incsemental grc~wth within the An;-heim Res~rt. Facilities and ~~uipment will be pro~•idrd
by the mitigation measures pruviJeJ balow. This wil! include specialized vehicles and ayuipment tc~
provid~ emerbency meJical response servi~es in the event rt' a major ~atastrophic event.
~:~ucx:s+se.c~~~ m~on~nuN.~u ~~ i -25 -
-.12- PC9~1- l 1 i
Implementation of tho tuUuwing mitigatiun m~asures, in comhination with ongoing City polictes
and programs, will servc to lessen ur avc~id Pruject impacts rclated tc~ tire protection, and th~ putential
effe~ts will b~ reduced to a level that is less than signiticant,
~j~ati~m Measure 3.9.1-1. Prior to commencement of structur:~l framing un each parcel or
lot, onsite tire hydrants shall be installeJ ancl chargecl by the property owner/develuper as
requirect and approved by the Fire Department.
M~Rlgatio~ [vteasure 3.9. i-~. Prior w approval of each grading plan, the pr~perty
ownerldeveloper shali submit an emergency tir~ access plan to the Firr, Department fer review
and approval tu ensur~ that servic~ ro the sit~ is in accordance with Fir~ Departmeni service
requirements.
Miti,g;~tic~n Measure 3.9.1-3. Priur to the issuance ~.~f each buildin~ permit, plans shall indicate
that all buildings, exclusive of parking stivctures, snall bava sprinklers installed by the property
owner/developer in accorclance witti the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be
installed prior to each 1'inal building and zoning inspection.
Mitip~ti~n Me~~~ure 3.9, I-4. Prior to the iss~.iance of each building permit, plans shall be
submitted ro ensure that developme. ' is in accordance with the City of Anaheim Fire Department
Standards, including:
a. Overhead clearance sliall not be less than l4 feet fur the full wiJth of access roads.
b. Bridg~s and underground structures tu be used fezr Fire Department access shafl be
Jesigned to suppc~rt fire Ucpartment vehicles weighing 75,000 pounds.
c. All underground tuonels shall have sprinklers. Water supplies are required at all
entrances. Star.dpipes shall als~~ he rruvicled when determined to be necessary ~~y the
Fire Dcpartment.
d. Adeyuate ~~ff-site puhlic tire hydrants contisuous to the Specific Plan area anc+ onsite
pr~v~~te tire hydrant:; shall be prc~vided hy the property owner/developer. The precise
number, types, and loc.,tions ot'the hydrants shall h~ Jetermined during building perrnit
review. Hydrants are tu be a maximum o!' 400 feet apart.
e. A minimum residual water pr~.~sur~ c-f ?.0 psi shall remain in the water system. Fl~~w
rates for public parking facilities shall he set at I,OUO tc~ i,500 gpm.
inoc~cauen~iws~uM.~u-~+i •26-
-~13-
I'CJ4-113
.---.
ly~ti~~~~te;tsure .,.9.1-5. {'riur tu the issuance ut' the tirst buildinb permit, the prop~;rty
owner/develuper shall enter inw an agreGmc;nt recordecl ~igainst th~ prorerty with the City of
Anal~eim to pay or causa to be paiJ their t'ai~ share ~Sf the funding to accommodata the
follawing, which will serve the Anaheim P.esort Specitic Plan area:
• One additional tire t~uck company,
~ One additional paramedic company.
• Muditications to exi:sting tire stations to accommodate the additional Pire units, additional
manpotiver, equipmont and faciliti~s.
• A vehicla equipped with specialty tools anJ equipment to enabl~ the Fire De~artment to
provide heavy search and rescue respcrose c.~p,ibility,
o A medical h~iage vehicle/trailer, equipped with sufticient trauma dressings, medical
s~~pplies, st:,;tchers, etc„ w handle I,000 injured persons, and an appropriate storage
facility.
The d~:tcrmination of dit aUocable share of custs actrihutable to the property owner/developer
shall he based on an ~~~portionment of the costs ut' such equipment/facilities among property
ownecsldevelopers in ~he Hotel Circle Spe~itic Plan Area, the Disneyland Resort Speaitic Plan
Ar~~ and th~ Anaheim Resort Spacitic Plan Area, or the otherwisc; defined service area, as
applicable, depenciing on the ar~~a servecl.
M~ti~ion Measure 3 9 -. Prior to each tinal building and zonin~ inspection, the propc;rty
awner/d~velope:c shall place emergency ~elephone service numhers in prominent locations as
~pprovecl Ey the Fire Department.
~titi~tion Measu~ 1 Q,1•7. Prior to issuance uf aach building permit, the property
owner/develuper shall submit a Construction rire Prutectiur, Plan ro the Fire Depanment for
review and a~proval detailing accessihility ot emergency tire equipment, tire nydrant location,
and any other construction features required by the Fire Marshal. Thc, property ow~eNdevNloper
shall be responsible for securing facilitias acceptahle to the Fire DepartmNnt and hydrants shall
be operational with requireJ tire tlow.
~4itieacion Me isure 3.9. I-8. Prior tu the ciprruval of water improvement plans, die wat~r supply
system shall be designed by the praperry uwner/developer to pr~lvide sufticient tire flow pressure
~nd srorage far the prup~sed land use and tire prc~tecti~m in a~cordance with Fire Department
requirements.
i:~.nec~uec~uw~m~n~~i.~zr.~.i -27-
_.1.~ _
rc~a-it3
~ '~"1~l~`K~, ~~1'~~,. :nw, .~ ` .;~*,y~~~,;,~,~~ '°~•+. ~
~ ~. ~~Ir~.
r ~~
3.9.2 Police $~rvic~s
3.9.2.1 p,~~~ial Siynifi~t tm~. The project-specitic and cumulative :mpacts uf the I~roject on
police services are discussed in Sectiuns 3.9.1. an~ 4.9.2 of the EIR. Dc:velopment under the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan wiil, both alone and ~,n combinution with dev~lopment of relatecl projects, lead to
significant increas~s in demand for police services. Nu other signiticant poli~e servicas impacts would
oacur.
3.9.2.2 ~j~di~eg. All signiticant impacts associat~d with police servic:s have been mitigateci to a less
than significant I~vel. Changes or ;-Iterations have l,een required in, or incarporated into, the Project
which mitigate or avoid the signiticant erfects on th~ environment relating to police services,
3.9.2.3 ~cts in Sunnc~rt of Findi,~gg. 'i'ha discussion and analysis in Sections 3.9.2 and 4,9.2 of the EIR
explain, ~.he faregoing tindings and con~:lusic~ns.
Additianal service calls from the Anaheim Kesort Specitic Plan area and relateci projecGe would
necessitate increaseci police services. 'Thz number of service calls projected for the year 2010 will Jou~le
carrent servicc: requirements in the Anahaim Resort Specitic Plan area, Th~ City wil{ fiind the additional
police protection services through tar, proceeds associated with ine:r~mental growth anticipatecf within the
Anaheim Resort.
[mplementation of the foll~~winf; mitigation measures, in comhin~tion with ongoing City policies
and programs, will serve to lessen or avoid Project impacts related to ~olice services, ~nd the potential
:ffects will be reducecl tc~ 1 level that is less than signiticant.
Mitigaticm Measure 3.9.~-I. Prior ro the appri~v,~l of each tinai site plan and issuance of each
building permit, the prupeRy uwntr/develop~r shall submit pla^s ro tt~e Police Department for
review and approval for the purpos~ af incorpc:ating safety measures in the project design
including the concept of cri!ne prev~ntion through environmental design (e.g,, building design,
circulation, site planning, and lighting of parking structures and parlcing areas).
Miti~ tiu 1a;~ir~~ 3.9.2-2. Prior io issuance of each building permit for a parking structure,
the propeny owner/developer shall submit plans ta the Police Department for r~vieH~ and
approval indicttting the pr~,vision ot closed circuit televisiun monitoring and recording or other
substituce security measures as may be approved hy the Pc~lice Depar-.n~ent. Said measures shall
bc implemented pr.or tu tinal building and zoning inspecti~ms.
MitigatiatLM~},~ure ~9.2-3. Ongoing during project or~eration, the prc~pcrty uwner/developer
shall provide private security on the premises to maintain adequate security for the entire project
subject to raview ar.~ approv;il ~~f tha Pulicr, Departntent. 'The use of security patr~~ls ar.d
IdpO('S13FI111~ON1~MDM.AZOr~ t - ~ ~ -
_as_ rc~a-~ts
electronicsecurity dev~ces (i.e., vidw moniturs) should be considered to reduce the potential for
criminal activity in the arca.
Mitieatioo Me~as~re 3 9~. Priar to issuance of each building permit, the project design shall
include parking lots aruJ parking structures widi contrnlled acce,es points tQ limit ingress and
egrPSS if determinecl to be necessary by the Police Department, and shall be subject to the review
and appraval af the Police Department.
3.9.3 So1id Wu~e~'~ ~a1
3.9.3.1 Potenti~lSienific_~nt impg~, 'fhe project-specific and cumulative impacts of the Project on
solid v+aste disposal are discusse~ in Sections 3.9.3 and 4.9.3 of the EiR, Construction and op~ration
uf development un~ier t}ie Annheim Resort Spac;iflc Plan wiil, both alone and iri combination with
development of related projects, lead to significant increases in salid waste ~eneratinn and therefore
significant im~acts on limited landfill capacity. No nti.er si~nificant solid waste disposal !mpacts wottld
occur.
3.9.3.2 ~a~jj,p~q, Project-speaific and cumulative solid waste impacts aee recluced t~ the er.tent feasible
by the City of An~heim Solid W~,~te Managemer-t Plan and the mitigatian measures identified below, but
will remai~ signi~cant. Except as to d~ese unavoidably significant impacts, changes ~r alterations have
been reguired in, or incorporatecl into, the ~rcject which mitigate or avoicl the significant cftects on the
environment relating eo solid w~ste disposal.
3.9.3.3 ~g~~,uunnrt of Fin,~pgg. The discussion ;ind analysis in Sections 3.9.3 and 4.9.3 of the
EIR enplain the foregoing findin~s and conclusioc~s. See Section 3.14 of the EIR for additional discussion
regarding construction impacts. The unavoidable significant solid wast,e disposal impacts identifi~ci En
Section 3.9.3.2 ubove aze discusseci further in Section 4.6 below in this docucnent.
The solid waste generat~l by future devzlopment associated with die Project and related projects
will r~sulc in sigo(~cant impacts due to limited landfill capacity. By Year 2010, the Anaheim Resart
Specific Plan area will ~enerate an estimated Z9,373 tons of waste annually, or R0.5 tons daily. This
constitutes only a small percentage (1,U percent) of the ma~cimum daily capacity at th.; expanded
OlinJa/Olinda Alpha Landfll; huwever, because of the limited capacity of the landfill, the impacts are
identifiea as signiPcant.
'1'he extent of demol ition activity within the Specific Plan area cannot be predictecl, If demol~tion
is substantial, impa~:ts of the debris on limited landfill capacity could be unavoidabiy signiticant.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-4 will recluce this impact to the extent feasible.
t:uwcs~secucweoa^nnM,~.cat -29-
-.lG- i'C94-1.13
Currulativu wast~ disposal tur the pruiect :m~ rolat~d pm.jects will be approximately 45,521 wns
per yNar, or 125 tuns p~r J~y, which is alsu a sibniti~ant imp;ict,
The City of Anal~eim Solid Waste Management Plan, utlier ongoing City and Cu:~nty programs.
anJ the rr~itigatian measures ~et forth bel~~w wi!f reduce ~hese impacts, but not to a level of insigniticance.
Jyjjjy;~i~n Measure 3.9.,~J,: Prior tu issu~r~ce of each building pcrmit, the property
owoerJdeveluper shall subinit project plans tc- th~ titainten~nce D~• utment fur review and
approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, the Solid `' .,te ke~luctiort Act of 1989,
~c administered by d» City of Anaheim anJ the Cou~ty of Orange and City of Anaheim
lntegrated Waste Management Plans. Prior to final bu~~ding anJ zoning inspection,
implementation of said plan shafl commenc~ and shall remain in full effect. Waste management
mitigation mea.,ures that shall be taken to reJuce solid waste generatiun include, but are not
limited to:
a. Uf~tailing the lo~~ations and design uf un-site recycling facilities.
b. Providir~Y on•si~e recycling recepta~les t~~ encourage recycling.
c. Complying with all F~deral, State anJ Ci:y regulaticros tbr tiazardous ittaterial disposal.
d. Panicipa;ing in the (:ir~ of Anaheim's "R~cycle Anaheim" prugram or other suhstitute
prograrn a.c may he developed hy th~ City,
In ordrr to meet tht requirem~nts ot' the SnIiJ Wa~te Reductic.m Act of l989 (AB 939), the
~troperty uwneN~Jev~lc-per shall implement nume~~~,~u~ solid waste rrxluction programs, a~ requirW
hy the Maimenance Department, including hut nr~t liroitec! t~~:
~ Faeilitating paper r:cycling hy prnviJing chute.s c~r c~-nvenient lo~ationa for sort;ng a~xl
recycling bins.
• racilitating carltx~ard recyclinb (exprcially in retail aseaz) by ~rnviding adeyuate space
and centralizeal loea-ic-n~ t~~r c~-Ile~ti~~a anJ bailing.
• Faciliea;ing glax~ recycling (expe~ialty frnm rectaurants) by pr~vidin}~ uleyuate spare for
scsning and stc~rinb,
• i'ruviding tra~h compact~-r:c t~ir nanrr,yclahle materiel. wh~npver feas~ble ¢n ~afu~e the
tatal volume s-f xciiiJ w~,tc and the ncmter uf trip. requiraS fcir call~~:tiun.
1`IYXfi~~ifLt'WfMNIN A2['; ~ I • 3Q'
~~l~~l,~.. ~ ~ .1
~ Pruhihiting curhsi~e pick-up.
Mit't~~(jQA Me:-s~r~ ~.9.3-2, Onguing during proje~:t n~cration, die foliowing practices shali bc
implemeRtaJ, as feasible, hy the pi'opiRy ow~neNdevelup~r:
• Usage of rec,ycled paper pruJucts tiir statiunery, letterh~ad, and packaging.
• Recov~ry of tnaterials ~uch as aluminum and cardt-oard,
• Collection ot'oftice paper t~ir recycling.
• Collection of polystyrene (ti~am) cups ti~r recycling.
• Ccsllection of gfass, Flastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridp,~,v, oil, batteries,
anQ scrap rnetal for recyeling or recovery.
3.9.4 p,~
3.9.4.1 pot~ntial Si~nificant Im~. The ~~roje~t-specific and cumulative impacts of the Project en
p;~rks are discussui i~ a~~tions 3.9.4 and 4.9.4 ~-f the EIR. Nu siynifi:ant impacts rclated to parks will
~.
UCCUf.
3.~.4.2 ~. Tl~c envirunmental effects r~latecl tu parkx have b~en determinecl tu be less than
~ignifiicant. Bccause no significant impacts will uccur, nu mitigatiun measurts are requirecl. Thus, n~-
chanAe,~ or alt~rations are requireel in or in~orp~irated into the Project.
3.9.4.3 ~~jp,,~y~~j Findingg, Tlic discu~si~n and analysis in S~wtiuns 3.9.4 and 4.9.4 of the GIR
~xplain the forrgning tindings anJ ~ondusions. S~r. al~u Secti~m 3. I uf the E(R tcir adJitional discussian
r~garding d~e Prnjett's consixtency witl~ the l:iry uf Anaheim Genc:•al F'lan, Parks, Recrr,atiun, anJ
Cummunity Sen~ic~.c Element.
No inSreaxeci dePcit in City parklands wiil r~.~ult frnm implementatinn of the Specific Plan
~roject. Cumulative impacts are Jiscussr~! in Sectinn 4.9.4 af the EIR. There arc ni~ s~gnificant impaets
to park~.
Implementation ntamenitie~ a«uciateJ with th~e Anaheim Rexart 5pecific P~an, such as enhanced
landscaping anJ pafe~trian walkwayx, Jecoralive signagc ~nd ~trcet Ceatur~s, is expectal to be an
impruvement ovcr exixting Anaheim R~.son recr~:a~ianal can,liti~ms, iherefore, a hen~fi~i~l impact will
RCClJf.
3.9.5 ~~
3.9.5.1 ~ t~Signeti;,••,~~. Thc praject-~recific anJ tumulative impact~ uf th~ Pmjc~~t on
schonls :u-e discusseJ i; ecti~m~ 3.9.5 anJ 4.9,5 at the rIR. 'f'the rtrecl fur ailditional schcx-I ~~tilitie.t
1'fXY.'{'4C4~+I'0't16MUN A7~ ~1 '; ~'
- ~3 ~.. ~~(•rl,t .. ~ ~ .~
hecause ct new stuJent generation to th~ Ar:-h~im City Schw~l Distri~t ("ACSD") ~ind the Anahcim Union
}ligh School District ("AUHSD") frum househut~s rs;lucating to th~ jurisdiction of tlws~ districts because
of empluyment oppartunities createcl by d~v~lopment under the AnahNim Resun Specitic Plan will be
significant. Cumulative school facilities impacts could alsu bc signiticant. Nu other significant impacts
on schools woulJ occur.
3.9.5.2 ~~, S~atutory school t'acilities fees coll~cted t'rr~m new development within the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan area and from new huusing indirectly induced by d~e Pro;ect will reduce the impacts
on A,CSD and AUHSD facili:i~.~, but not tu an insigniticant level. Cumutative schoo! facilitie,e impacts
ceuld also bc unavoiJably sip,nEticant. Changes ur alterations have been rcyuireJ in, nr incorporat~;l into,
the Project which mitigat~ or avoid, tu d~e extent feasihle, the signiticant eff~:cts on the en~ironment
relating to schools.
3.9.5.3 ra ~ in Suna~rt o. "~)~,~.j~~..z. Ttie discussion and analysis in S~ctions 3.9.5 and 4.9.5 of the EIR
explain tt~e foregr~ng fi.~r ngs am: con~lusions. Un.rvuidahly signiticant school impacts are discusse~!
furthcr in Section 4.7 ue;~w i~ .;iis d~~cument.
!'secause the Anuhei,., Resort Sp~cific Pl;+n ~u~s nut nc; mit housing units to be developed in the
specific p{an area, development under the Pruject will have nu ~lirect impact un schools. lt can be
anticipateJ, however, that emplnyment oppurtunities associateJ wuh new developmen: under the specific
plan and rela~ecl projects wifl induce som~ households w rclocate into the City of Anaheim. Indirect
Pn~ject-iuduced household growth within the ACSD and AUHSD jurisdictiun has bcen esdmat~l at
approximately 2,400 hnuschulds by the year 2010, which are in turn expectecl to nroduce 588 potential
AUHSD students and 754 ACSA stuJents.
The total facilities costs (up ta 513.7 million) ,~.~tiuciated with this incre,~se in student population
is project~J tu exceul the combineJ .r•tatutury schu~~l t'aci{ities fees (~8,3 mi;lion) ger.erate~f by Project
develupment anJ Jevelopment of 2,400 new housinb units. Theretirr~, schonl facilitie.s impacts cnuld be
significant.
Because uf the absen~e ot' dttaileJ Jata un the ~har;i~t~ristics of th~ labur force a.csociatecl with
the relatecl proje~ts, it i, nut pussible to ral~:ulatc th~ inJirect huusehold generution and net school
facilities irnpacts •~t' thc: relatecl prajects with any ce~ainty. 'fhe analysis in City uf An:theim EIR No.
31 I tor tha Disneyl•rncl Res:~rt pruject (whi~h is the I:irgaxt vt the relatrd projects) inJicated that school
irnpacts from that pruject wuuld not he si6niti~ant. T'hc ind:re~:t s~ho~.-I impacts uf the other relat~xl
prc-jects can nut ba preJictecl at thi~ time, hut are ~~uicnsiaily unavc~idahly sibniticant.
Th~ mitig~tion measure set ti~ri.. n~luw wiil reJuce school impa~ts, but not to a level of
in~ignificance.
i ~~xx.n~u~,sivxw~nuM ~~A• .~ -12-
PC:~,1.. ~ ] i
_,~~1_
Mlll~;~ti~~n M~;-surr 1 9 S-I: priur t~~ issuanc~ uf ca~h huil~ing permit, th~ property
owner/dev~l~~prr shall pruvi~e pruuf tu the E3uii~ling Divisiun ot the Planning Dsnartmani that
school impact fees have be~n paid cunsistent with State statutes.
3.9.6 ~/ater Service
3.9.6.1 Potenti~~ Sieniti,~~p,~g, The project-sp~citic and cumulative. impacts of d~e Pruject on
wat~r service are cliscussul in Sections 3.9.G an~l 4.9,6 of the EfR. Th~ Nxisting water system is
inadequate ro handle the peak demanJs which may result from development und•.r the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan and the relateci projects. Withuu; aJJitic~nal water productiun and distribution facilities,
water system impacts will be signiticant, Nu ut1~~r signiticant wst~r system impacts would occur.
3•9•6•2 1'in~iine,. All signiticant impacts associatecl with water service have been mitigated to a less th:tn
signiftcant level, Changes oc alterations have be~n reyuired in, or incorporated into, the Project whiclt
mitigat~ or avoid the signiti~ant effects nn th~ environment -•alating to watcr servic~.
3.9.G.3 ~cts in Supjx~rt of Fi in . The dis~ussion:+nd anal;~,is in Section . 3.9.6 and 4.9.6 of the EIR
expl~in the fore~oing findings and conclusi~ins. Se~ti~m 3.7 ahove in th~se finJings (Groundwa,~r and
Surface Hydrology) adJresses the patantial Jepletiun ut' gr~~unJwater resources. This Sectior. 3.9.6
addresses impacts on the facilities fi~r ths '~ ib '~~ uf water.
The existinb capacity of tbe water suprly systeni wiil be exceeded by peak water demznd
associated w+uti buildout of the Proje~t. Full buildout ~if the Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan through Year
201U will result in a net increase in averabe daily water ~:onsui»peion by 4.0 million galluns pcr day
(mgd). The imprc~vements t~.- the existin~ water supply system descrih~d in htitigatiun Mea.aure 3.9.6-3
below will be requirecl to adequatcly serve th~ specitic rlan ar~a.
Cumulatively, develupment under the Pruject and reiat~:c! proje~ts will increase averagP .faily
demand by approzimately 7.I mgd. TFe cumul~tive in~rease in JemanJ in the Anaheim R~~curt will br:.
accommodated by the water system improvcmentx identiti~l in the EIR (Nu. 313) and th'r• EIR (^~u. 311)
for the DisneylanJ Res~~rt. 1n~re~.ecss in uther areas will he accc~mmudatec! through c~ther improvemenG4
financ~J with devel~.~p~r and/~~r ~ser feer~.
Implementation uf th~ f.~ll~iwing rnitigatiun rri~asurcx will rc~rve to fessea ur avoicl water service
impactt. anJ thr putential et'te:ts will he reJuc~d te~ a level that ix lesx th:in signiticant.
~'{j(jY7~P~~~'~~.~`~.6-~. Prirr ~o issuance uf ~a~h huilJing ptnnit: tc~ bc itnplementeJ prior
to tinal ~uilding ~nd t.oning inxpe~tiun; and, unguing Juring prciject uperati~m, ~l~e property
o~mer~d~veloper shall suhmit pl;~nx to the Utiliti~.; Dep~rtm~nt Gir rcvi~w and approval which
shall en~ure thas wa~er cunser:ati~m mea,ur~s ar~ ina~rp~~rateJ. Am~mc the water conservation
1. ~[Kl('~ S(;(111 ~O~MAI)N. A71'~~1 .'; a,
-~ill~ ~~~.~~'3' ~ ~:~
met~.tiur~s to he shc~wn un thc ~lanx an~ imhlc;m~nte~l hy th~ pruperty owner/developer, to the
extent applicable, inclu~c:, hut are nut limite~l tu, the ti~liuwing:
• Use of low-fluw sprinkler heads in irrigatiim systtms.
~ Use of waterway recirculation systems.
• Use of low-tlow tittings, tixtures, anct equipment, including low tlush toilKts anJ urinals.
• Use of self-closing v;tlves on drinkin~ fountains.
• Ure of ~fticient irri~ation syste~ns such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which
use moiswre sensois.
~ Use of low-tlow shower heaJs in hotels.
A IJse uf water efticieni icc-machines, dishwashcrs, clothes u~ashers and other wuter-using
appliancc;s.
• Us~ uf irrigatiun systems prim,irily at night when evanoration ~ates ar~ lowest.
~ Provida information to the ruhlic in cunspicuous places r~garding water cortservation.
• Use of a~ater-conserving lancfscape plant materials wherever f~asihle.
Mitie2lion Me~cure 3•9,y¢~, prior to ,~rpr~-val uf !he tirst subdivision map or the issuance oF
the first gc;idinb permit or huilding permit, whichevrr accurs first, the property uwner/devefuper
shall enter into an agrer.ment recordul ;~};ainst the pruperty wkh the City of Anah~im, to thc
satisfaction of the Utilitie, Dep~rtment and City Attorncy's Oftice, to ~uarai~tee the property
owneNdeveloper's participatinn in w~t~r syssem ir7provements nec~.ssitateJ by the project. 7'he
agreement shall contain provisicros reyuiring che prupcrty uwneNd~veloper tu pay or causr. to
he paid i's fair share funding fc-r said impruvements anJ/or ronstruct said improvements, if
determineJ t~ be ne~cssary by the Utiiities Def~artmcnt, with rcimbursement by other
ben~ticiarias in accr~rdance wieh the Utility's Rates, Rules, anJ Regulations. Cosh shall include
the payment for ~crosultandcontraetur s~rvi~eti ti-r thc nrrlimi~~ary engineering, soils analysis,
r9ght-of-way acquisitiun, d~~m~~litiun, construction and inspection, anJ any other rel~t~A exprnsw.
Fur:her, the property owncNdev~luper shall suhmit an ~ngineering report ~nd pbasing plan for
rrview and approval hy th~ l.Jtilities D~partment setting ti~rth the rxtent anJ timing of the water
system improvements n~cdssitatrd by tha prnjc~t ti~r use in implementing the agreement. Th~s
property uwneNJ~reluper shall at ~ill tim~x r~rtimn icx ubli6;~tiuns as set ti~rth in said agreement.
I:Ipp~.y~y~~lW/MMUM.A%1.'1J1 ';,;-
_~1_ PC91-113
Water system improv~ments i~lentiti«I in the environm~ntal documentatian toc buildout ~~f the
Anaheim Resort, which the prupe:ty uwner/cleveluper may be required to participate in, include:
a The existirg 8-inch diameter pipc in Clementine Street from Katella Avenue to Freedman
Way shall be replacect by a 20-inch ctiamttcr pipe,
s Th~ ~xisting 10-inch cliameter pipe in FreeJman Way :rom Clementine Stre~t to klarbuc
Buulevard shall be replaced by a 20-inch diameter pipe.
• 'Th. existing 10-inch diam~ter pipe in Harbar ,suul~vard from Convention Way to
Freedman Way shall be replacc;d by a 20-inch diameter pipe.
• The 12-inch pipe in KateUa Avenue frum Harbur poulev,ud to Ciementine Street shall
be replaced by a 20-inch diameter pine•
+r The ea~stin~; 10-inch diameter pipe in Harbor poulevard from Fr~edman Way to Harbor
Boule~ard north of Manchester Avenuc shall be rtplaced by a 16-in~h cfiamet~r pipe.
• An additional water w~ll shall be cunstructed near ~he intersection of Clen~entine Street
and Er~edman Way.
• The ~xisting l4-inch and 12-inch diameter pipes in We.ci Sh•t~t from Katella Avenue to
Ball Road shall he replaced by a 2U-inch pipe.
,~' = ior~ tity•,}„tiur~9 ~:3. Pric~r to issuance of each building permit, all water supply planning
for the project will be clusely coordinatcd with, ancl be subj~ct to th~ review arid tinal approval
of, the Utilities Departmant, Water Engineering Division and Fire Department,
~vtitieati~n Me ` r~2,f~-4. priur to issuance of each building permit, water pr~:ssure ~reater
than RO puunds per square inch (psi) shall be reduced to RO psi or lecs hy means of pressare
reducing valves inst~alled at thu properry owner/develuper's service.
3.9.7 W~~~1y~.tcrlS~wcr $~LY't~4
3.9.7.1 ~Q,(gQtial Si' i,~ fcant ~moact~• '~[1~e project-specitic and cumulative impacts of the Project on
wastewater/sewer servic~ are discussed in Sectiw~s 3.'3.7 and 4.9.7 ~f the E[R. Without additional s~wer
line improvements and wat~r con:.erv~tiun m~asures, wast~water gencratecf from development under the
Anaheiin Resort Specitic Plan will signihc;intly impact and uverburden exiscing sewer piQe capacities.
Cumulative wastewater increases because of devel~inment un~er the Pruject and related pmjects will also
i:~t~ocs~sauru~ennuM.nu•~,i •35-
_5__ f'1:9~1-113
b~ signiticant in th~ absencc: ot' syst~m impruvements. Nu ~~thcr signiticant wastewater/s~wer 3ervice
impacts would uccur.
3.9.7.2 F,jn~pp,~. All signiticant irnpacts associated with wastewater/sewer service will h~ mitigated to
a less than signitic~nt level by the mitigatir~n measure set forth below. Chang~s ur altecations hav~ been
required in, or incorporuted into, the Projc;ct whi~h mitigate: or avuid th~ signiticant effects on the
environment r~lating to w;tstewater/sewer service.
3~I.7.3 Facts in S~~nort c~f Findines. The ~liscussion and analysis in Sections 3,9,7 and 4.9,7 of the F1R
explain the foregoing tindings and conclusions,
As identitiad in the South Central Area Se;ver Detir.icncy Study, by year 2010 with buildout of
the Project ancf relatr.cl projec~s, a c:unufative tutal of 39,947 linear feet of sewer pipe segment
deficiencies will resuit (an incre:~se of 19,10: lin~;~r t'eet over eristing conditions). By year 2a10, fup~re
development within tbe specitic plan area will generatc an aclditional average daily sewage flow of
~pproKima.tely 2.2 million gallons pe-• Jay.
Tha sewer line upgrades an~ new lines needed to accummodate ~c:velopment under the Pruject
and related projects are identitieQ in "fable 3.9-1~4 of th~ EIR. Implementation of the mitigatinn measure
descrihed below will insure th~t th~ line impruvements are implementecl as development proc~ects, and
will recluce the ~r~tential si6nifi;:ant effects to a less thtm signiticant lev~l. Implementation of the water
consecvztion measures listed in Section 3.9.6 above in this document will serve tu further recfuce
wastewater tlows and deman:ls on the sewer system.
~j' ':-~,on ivteasure 39.7-1, Prior tn anproval of a tinal subdivision map or issuance ~f a
gra~ling or huilding permit, whichev~r occurs tirst, th~; prope~ty owner/develuper shall
pacticipatc; in ti~e City's Master Plan of Sewers and relatcd Infrastructure Improvements (Fee)
~rogram to assist in mitigating existing aml tiiture sanitary sewer system det~ciencies as tollows:
The property owner/developer shall submit a rer~~rt fnr revicw and approval by the City
Engineer to assist with J~termining the following:
a. If the developm~nt/redevelupment (I) dues nc~t discharge into a s~wer system that is
currently Jeti~ient c~r wili becum~ Jcti~ient becaus~ uf that discharoe and/ur (2) does nat
increase tlows ur cnangc puints ut' discharge, then th~ property own~r's/developer's
responsihiliry shall he limited tu particip:ttion in thc {nfrastructure [mprovement (Fee)
Progr;mt,
b. It the d~velupment/re~~v~lupment (1) discharg~s into a sewer system thac is curr~ndy
deti~ie~it or will become deticient he~ausa uf that Jischarga, and/c~r (2) increases tlows
i:~n~s~~r•.c~~ra.a.~,.o,~.~~,~~,.~ -3G-
-5.;- f'C94-1 13
or ch,~nges points ut' discharge, th~n the nruperty uwner/developer shall be requirecl to
guarantee mitigation to the s~uisfactiun ut' the City Engineer and City Attorney's oftice
ot' the impact prior to appruv~J of a tinal suhdivision ma~ or issuance uf a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs tirst, pursu,-nt to the improvements identit"ied in the
South Central Araa Sewer Deticie.ncy Study. The property owner/dev~lo~er shall be
required to install the sanitary sewer taciliti~s, as recommendecl by the South Central
Area Sewer peticiency Study, prior to acceptance for maintenance of public
improvements by the City or tinal bttilding and zoning inspections For the
building/structure, whichever occurs tirst. Additionally, the p;operty owneNdeveloper
shall participate in che [nfrastnicture improvement (Fee) Program, as determined by d~e
City Engineer, which r:oul~ incluJe fess, credits, reimbursements, or a combination
thNreof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation uf impacts for the sanitary sewer syst~m,
the property own~rs/develuper shall submit a sanitary sewer system improvement phasing
plan F~r the project to the City Engineer for review and approval which shall contain,
at a mii~imum, (I) a layout uf the complete system; (2) all facility sizes, including
support calculations; (3? construction phasing; and, (4) constructiun estimates. The study
shall dtterr!mine the impact of the project s~wer tlows For total buildout of tl~e project and
identify local deticiencies fur each project cumponent (i.e., each hatel).
3.9.~f S~orm Ur~ins
3.9.8.1 Potenti:-I Sir.nificant imn;~, 'fhe pruject-spacitic and cumulative impacts of die Project on
storm drains are discussed in Sectians 3.9.8 and 4.9.8 of the EIR. Without additional storm drainage
improvements, increased runoff resulting From development und~r the Anaheim Resort 5pecific Pian will
signific~nNy impact and overburden existing drainage capacities. Gumulative storm runoff increases
because of development under the Project and related rruje~ts will alsn he signiticant in the absence of
system improvements. Th~re is a~otenti;~l, absent mitig,~tion, for signiticant shon-term impacts to the
sturm drains from uncontrolled accumulation uf silt in the runoff from construction of development within
the Anaheim Resort Specitic P1an area an~ cunstruction of related prc~jects. No i~ther siRnificant storm
drainage impacts wcwld occur.
3.9.8.2 Findin~-g, AU signiticant impacts assoei~~ted with storm Jrains will be miti6ated to a less than
~~Lniticant level by th~ miC~;ation mec~.eure sct forth below. Changes ur alterations have been required
in, er ;~. ~rr,~rat~d into, the Project which mitigace or avoid th~ signiticant effects on th~ environment
relating Yo stu:~n drains.
3.9.8.3 FactS in Sua[tc~rt of Findines. The discus~ion and analysis in Sections 3.9.8 and 4.9.8 of the EIR
axplain the f~regoinb findings ~nJ conclusic;ns.
i:~oc~csvF~~~~wroe~~nti~ n~.~~,ii -37-
-54- PC94-1.13
,--~.
The existinb storm drain system in the Project area has the capacity ro accommodata runoff from
a 2-year tu 8-year sturm. DevNlopment under the Pr~ject and related projects is likely to decrease
psrme~ble surfaces and th~reby increase storm drain runoff,
Drainage system impruvements neuled ro address existing deticiencies and accommodate buildout
of the Pruject and related proj~cts ha~~e been id~ntitied in the City's r~cently completed Mas:er Plan of
Drainage for the South (:e:rtral Area, These improvements are described in Section 3.9,8 of the E[R.
Implementation of the mitigation measure d~scrihed below will insure that the lir.e improvements
are implemented as development procee~s, anJ w~ll reduc~ the potential significant effects to a less than
signiticant level. Impacts to storm drains from silt in runuff from construction sites will be mitigated by
the measures discussed ahove in Section 3,7, Gruundwater and Surface Hydrology.
Impl~menta[ion of the follc~wing mitigation measure and the mitigation mea~ures discussuJ above
in Section 3.7, Groundwat~r an~l Surface Hyclrology, will rc~duce storm clrain impacts to a I~vel that is
less than significant.
jyj~,~gation Measure 3.9.8-I. Prior ro approval of a tinal subdivision map or issuance ~f a
grading or building permit, whichever occi-rs tirst, the proptrty owner/developer shall
participate in the City's Nlaster Plan of Starm Drains and related Infrastructure Improv~ment
(Fee) Prugram ro assist in mitig~ting existing ancl futur~ storm drainage system deficiencie.~ as
follows:
The propc;i~ty ownerldeveloper shall sutimit a report ti~r review and approval by the City
Engineer tu assist with derermining the following:
a. If the specitic development/redev~lopment does not increase or redirect current
or histocic storm water quantitiesltlows, then tha property owner's/developer's
responsibiliry sh~ll be limited to participation in the Infrastructure lmprovement
(Fee) Program to provi~le sturm drainage faciliti~s in i0- ~nd 25-year storm
frec~uencies and to prutect prupertieslstructures ti~r a lOQ-year storm fraquency.
b. lf the specitic developmer.tlredcvelopment increases or rt;ciirects the current nr
yi3toric storm water quantity/tlow, then tiie property owner/developer shall be
required to guarantee mitigation to the satistaction oti the City Engineer and City
Attorney's Oftice uf th~ im~~act prior to approval of a tinal subdivision map ur
issuance uf a gradinb or builQing permit, whichever occurs tirst, pursuant to d~e
impcov~ments identitied in the Master Plan uf Drainag~ for tlie South Central
Area. The pruperty uwner/develuper shall be requirr~J to install the storm
drain•age facilities as rec:immendeJ hy the Master Plan of Drainage fur th~ South
i:~twcs~sr:c~+iwrn~,+uM.~:ci~ i -3 E-
_55_ FC94-11.3
Central Area to pnrvi~le storm draina~e faciliti~s fe~r IU- and 7.5-year storm
frequencias and to prutc;ct pro~erties/structures for a IQO-year storrtc tirequency
prior to a~c~ptance for maintenance of Pubiic imprnvements by the City or final
building and zoning inspection for tt~e building/stcucture, whichever occurs first,
Additionally, the property owner/developer ~hall particip;tte in th~ (nfraatructure
Improvement (Fee) Program as determined by the City Engineer which could
include fees, credits, reimbursemer~ts, or a combir~ation theraof. As part of
guaranteeing the mitigation of i-npacts on d~~ :torm drainage system, a storm
drainage system improvement phasin~ plan fur the pruject shall be submitted by
the property owner/developer to the City~ Enginter for revitw and approval und
shall contain, at a minimum, (l) a layout of the compiyte system; (2) all facility
sizes, including support calculations; (3) construction phasing; and, (4)
c~nstruction estimates.
3.9.9 ~lectri~y
3.9.9.1 ~Q~rntiaJ S:gnificant lmpacts. Th~ project-specitic and cumulative impacts of the Project on
electr~city demand and distributian are discussed in Sections 3.9,9 and 4.9.9 uf th~ EIR, Uistribution
facilities may need to be added to acconunodat~ new development under tha Project and related projects.
Np other significant impacts relating to electricity will occur.
3.9.~.'t ~~. Changes or alterations hav~ been required in, or incorporated into, the Pcoject which
mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the envirunment ralating to ~lectricity.
3.9.9.3 Fa 4 in_S~ipport of Findingg, The discussion and analysis in Sections 3.9.9 and 4.9.9 of the E[R
axplain the foregoing findings and conrlusions,
Su~cie~~t electrical power will be available through the year 2010 to serve Jevel~pment under
the Project and Relatt:cl Projects. Cumulative demand in the year 2~10 is estimated at 11, i million
kilowatt hours (kWh) per day, of which 638,000 kWh is attributable to development under the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan.
Improvements and upgrades in the local dish'ibution system will be requirecl, and will be funded
through rates paid by electric utifity consumers.
The ~[R identities exposure to electromagnetic tields as an existing circumstance that is typical
in urban communities.
Implementatiun of th~ fi~lluwing mitigation measures will reduce im~,acts relating to electriciq~.
1:1 Wl'S~S[i1111V)t1CMDM..\2C1~ I ' 3~~'
_s~r E~c~~n-~ i~
itigatj~m Me;~;ure 3,~).9-I . Prior tu issuance ut' ~ach huil~ling rermir, to b~ implemt~teaJ prior
to each tinai building and zoning inspection, the property uwner!developcr shall submit plans
showinb that each str~acture will compiy with the State En~rgy Efticiency Standards for
Nonr~.cidential Buildings (Tide'l4, Part 6, Articlc 2, California Cocie of Regulati~ns); and, will
consult with the City of Anahtim Utilities L~epacnnent, Resource ~ffici~ncy Division in order
to r~;view above Tide 24 measures to incorporat~ into the project design including energy
efficient designs,
jvLSigation Meast~.~.3.9.9-2. Prior to tinal builclin~ ~nci zoning inspection, the property
owner/developer shall implement encrg,y-saving practic~s in compliance with TiHe 24, which
may inclu~e the following:
~ Use of high-etiticiency air conditioning systems controlled by a computerized
management system including tieaturc:s such as a variable air volum~ system, a
100-percent outdoor air ecc.~nomizer cycle, sNquential operation of air conditiuning
equipment in accordanc~ with building demands, isnlation of air conditioning ro any
selected tloor or tlocics.
• Use of electric mc~tors ~Icsigned to conserve energy.
• Use of special lighting fixtures such as motion sensing lightswitch devices and compact
tluore.scent tixtuces in place of incaodescent lights.
• Use of T3 lamps und electroiic ballasts. Metal hallidr or high-pressure sodium for
outdoor lighting and parking lots.
i i i~M ~.~~,r~, 3.9.9-3. Prior to issuance of each building permit for any buildings
reyuiring a change in electrical service, the pruperty owner/developer shall instait an
undergrourd electrical service fram the Pubiic Utilities Distribution Syster~~. The Underground
Se:vice will be installul in actiorclanc~ with the Electric f;ules, Rates, Regulations ancf Electrical
Specifications for IJnderground "ystem:;. Electrical Servica Fees and other applicable fees will
be assesseci in accordance with the Elacvic Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical
Specifications for Undargrnund Systems.
~jgation ivfeasure 39,g-4. Prior to installa~i~m of any transformers, the p~o~,erty
owner/developer shall submit evic! ~.ic~ to the Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering
Division, that the transformers are PCt; fre~.
1:\pOC3\SECUI~ON06AADM.A7.Clal -4~'
_j7~ ~C9~-L~J
, .,..-
3.9.1~ Natur~d ~
~9.14T.1 P~ote tial„$jp,~,~,~~~a Imn~. The project-specitic and cumulativa impacts of the Praject
on natural ~;as service a,•e ~iscuss~;d in Sections 3,9.10 and 4.9.10 of the EIK. 'i'here are no significant
impace.~; relaced te~ n~t.nral gas service.
3.9.10.2 1?' irr ~.'Y'htxe art no sibniticant impacts ralated to natural gas service,
3.9.~0.3 ~•~ ir~ ~~.~,i ~IFinclines. The discussic~n and analysis in Sections 3.9.10 and 4.9.10
of the EIR explain the fore~oing findings and conc{usions.
Develapment under the Project and related projects through the year 2010 will increase
cumulative demand far naturai gas co 97C,57S ~~t@TU annually, of wh:ch 508,730 MBTU is attributable ~
to devslopment un~ler the Anaheim Resorc Specitic Plan. The Souaiarn California Gas Gompany has
indicated that it wili be able to meet this demand,
Implementation of Mitigation Measurt; 3.9,9- t~see Section 3,9.9,3 above in this d~:ument) and
the foUowing mitigation measure will reduce demand for natural gas,
i ie~u~~,M~~ure ~..Q,S~1-.1.. The Southern California Gas Compan;~ has developed several
programs which are intr,nded co assist in the selecti~~n oF the most energy-efticient watar heaters `~
and furnaces. The pronecty uwner/developer shall implement a program, a.c rsquired, to eeduce
the demand an nat~aral gas supp~its.
,~
3.9.11 hon _~Scryicu ~t
3.9.U.1 rt i; l~'ip,nificttntYm • c, c, The project-specitic and cumulsitiva impauts of the Project
on telephone service are discussed in ~ections 3.9, I 1 and 4.~,11 of th~~ EiR. 'Chere are no significant
impacts to ~elaphone servica
3.9.11.2 ~in in . There are no signiticant impacts reiating to telephnn~ service,
,
3.9.~1.3 I~S~__Sip..~c-rtof Findinas. The cEiscussion and analysis in Sections 3.9.11 and 4.9.11
of tne EiR explain di~ for~going tindings and conclusitins. Future development under the Anahei-n
R~.sort Specific Plan and related pro;acts will increase the demand un tno to:lephone servlce system. The
service supplier, 1Pacitic Bell, has indicated that it will h~ ahle to m+:et the future demand for service.
i:~oocs~sc~aro~onnnrm,.~zc,~i -a l -
S8_ PC94-113
3.9.12 Telcvj,~p Scrvicc/Rc • ~ ' i
3.9.12.1 pytenti• Si~nificant Im~.;t~13. The pniject•specitic and ~umulative impacts of the Project
un television service/re~rption are Jiscussed in S~ctiuns 3.9.12 anJ 4.9. I3 e>f th~ E1R. (t is possible that
broadcast television recaptiun .~y area residences and husinrsses m~ry be interfered with by future
development of taU structures under the Anaheim Re~urt Specitic Plan and relateJ prujects. No other
signifi~ant impact~ ~vill uc~ur.
3.~.12.2 ~j~'y~. All signiticant impacts .~.csociateJ with television service have been mitigated
to a less than signiticant level. Changes or alterati~ms havc hedn reyuired in, or incorporat~l into, the
F'toject which mitig;~te ur avoid !he significant etfects on the environment relating to televisiun
servicelreception.
3.9.12.3 ~g~je,~pt ix~rtof F,~ti ~. Th~ discu~siun and analys~s in Sectiuns 3.9.12 and 4,9.12
of the EIR explain the furegoing tinJ~ngc anJ :~mclusiuns. Th~ ti-Ilowing miti~ation meacure will serve
ro maintain aJequate hruadca~t television re~epti~m, and will recluce the rotential effe~ts to a less ~han
significant levcl.
Mitip,,~ion ~j,easure 3.9.12-1. Wi;hin 6 months attcr cumpletiun ~~f builcling exteriors uf new
developments uve~r 75 feet in height, a stuJy uf area televisiun reception shall he undcrtaken ~y
the property owner/devcluper anJ suhmi~teJ to thc City Cngineer for review and approval. If
the Ciry of Anaheim Jetermin~.c that the prnpnsrcl project creates a significant impact on
broadcast television reception at lu~:al residenc~.g a~d other existing hntelslresta~uants or uiher
businesses, a signal bon~tcr or relay ayxtem shall bc ii-xtallr.~ h~ the property owner/developer
immediately un the ra-f uf the talle~t rr~~je~t huilJir~g t~r re.ture tclcvi.. ,n recc~tion to its
original conditinn. In n~i event ~hall heighta ~~~t furth in Sectiun 18.C4.035 uf thc Anaheim
Munici~~a! C~nle entitlyd. "S~ructurat Neight l.imi-ati~mx-Anahrim Commercial Recreation Area"
be exceufrc9.
3.10 ~pyh,.Di~cj.ala
3.1!1.1 1~te~;a~si~rii~c~r,s.t1~. ~rr,~ pr~,~~•<<•.r~:iti~ auJ ~umulxtive impa~t~ of the Project refating
to ha~ud~ux material~ are JiscvsxaJ in Secti~+na 3.10 ancl 4.10 ~~f the Elfi.
Soil cont~minatic~n frnm leaking unJergr~-un~l.a-ragc ~ank~ i~ knawn tc- ecist at seven sit~c within
the Anahcim Rcsc-n Specific Plan arca. i~utur: Jevelupmcnc/r~Ylcv~lupmenc within the SpP:irc F'lan arc.~c
u~uid encounter the ccm~amir-a~ior~ origiha~in~ frum th~•~c xi~c+. If :ontaminatiun levcla at theae ~ites in
exeess uf faleral, atata, anJ <<-cal a~anJar~ls ar~ encaunicrrcl hy unpm::cted w~~rkers c-r thc punlic frum
the listal ~ite.s, c-r fram arra. th~t wcr~ m~t knuwn tu hc ~unr~minateJ, it waulJ he a rigr.ific~nt health
~mpact. No othcr signilictint imra~~z rclit~rl t~- hvarJnu~ matcrials arc anticipatal.
1'(Y).^.i'~KY~II~MINMCM AJ~ If •~{~•
_,,~~_ 1'(.'..>,!-l 13
3.10.2 Fj~J,jpg,y. All signiticant impa~ts us~~~ciat~~ with h:u.anluus materials have been mitisatc~l t~ a
lesg than signiticant levcl. Changes ur alteratiuns have been reyuired in, ur incorpuratul into, the Pruject
which miti~at~ or avoid th~ signiticant etfects un the environment relating tu hazard~~u~ materials.
' 3U.3 ~~ in Supnart of Findings. Th~ dis~uss~~~n and analysis in C~ctions 3.10 and 4.10 of the EIR
explain the fiiregoing tindirgs and conclusiuns. Sre Section 3.14 uf the EIR fe~r adJitional dis~ussion
regarcfing constructiun impacts.
Tha potential hazarduus materials impacts asso~iare~ with Jevelupment under the Project and
relatecl prejects will be reJuced tu an insigniticant level with implemrntation o- the mitigation measur~
set forth below. They supplement a cc~mpr~h~nsive systcin ~~f state anJ fede~al I~ws and reguladon,a
designecl to lead W the identitication and remeJiation of h:vardous waste contamination.
~irati~m Measure 3.IQ-l. Prior to approva! ot the tirst grading plan ur issuance of the frst
demolit'son permi:, whichever oc~urs tirst, in areas ot' timner service st2tions, in ;~re~c known
or thought to hav~ b:en f'orm~rly occupied hy US'Ts, an<I in ~reas where tank removal has nat
heen v~ritied ~riur tu ~xcavation ur graJing, the pro~crry owneNdeveloper shaU retain the
serviccs of a yualitieJ envirunmental prufessional t~~ conduct an im~estig~tion for known, or Ihe
presence of, cryptic ta~k~, usin~; g~~c-~+hysi~al m~~hudc.
Soil samplin6 ar a suil organi~ vap~~r survey may be r~c{uireJ it' soil sampling results are nut
availabie, or ~ndicate contaminati~~n is present abuve regulatory guidelines. If warrantod,
subsurface invectigatiem anJ sampling shall he undertaken in these areac, anJ appropri~te
remeJiaiion measures develapeJ, if recessa,-y, hef~~re Jem.,~~tion, excavation, or grading takes
place in these area.a.
~in tilcasure 3.IU-2. Pri~-r to the remnval of' USTx. ~hc propeny uwner/develuper shall
obtain a permit from ~hc L-:n~imnmental 1'mtc~tiun S~cti~m of the Fire Ucpartment for the
remcival of such tanks. During the remaval uf USTs, a re, re.~entative fr~~m the Environmental
Protc~ticm Secti~-n c~f the Fire Uepartment ~hall be ancite ta uirect soil sampling.
~,~(jyrL~lea~ure 3.10-3. ong<-ing during remuliati~rn. all rem~~cliati~m a~~ivities ~~f surface
or suhcurface cumamina~iun nnt rclatcJ t~~ UST., ~unduct~~.t un hehalf c~f the ~roperty
uwner/devel~~rcr. ~hall he uvcr~c~n hy ~he Qrangc Cr.umy Health ~rpartment. Infiirm~ticm on
~uhs~rface c~~ntaminatiun frurn US1's •hall he prnviJecl tu the Fire Depanment.
~jijy,gtiun •~1e~Kere_3 10-4. Priur ~~- apprnv~l ~-f the tirat gr~din~ plan ur is~uancc i-f tht firxt
dcmulitian pcnnit. WI11CI1CVM ~1~.;Uf% Ilf~l, th~ rm~-crty ~-wneNd~vcluper ~hall su~mit a pl~n for
review anJ appraval uf thc fire Depirlmcnt which J~Kaik prcitalures Ihaf will be take~ if
previaucly unl:rx~wn lDS1'x, ar ~~thcr unkn~~wn haxard~~u~ mater:al ar wa•te, ix Ji~a-verc~f ~inxite.
1 -V14"1',1f!'JI~IMIM1N~IN ~7i..~1 •~~•
-~ l~- /~i,~~~~- ~ ~ ~1
Mitil tiL_ti.~,;~;u~ ,~,,IO_S. Priur tu aprruval uf th~ tirst grading plan ur issuanc~ ut thc tirst
demulitiun pcrmit, whichc:v~r uccurx tirst, tiir linur~ dc:velupments within th~ Anaheim R~,tion
Specitic Plan area affecting th~ Calitiirnia Chemical CumP;tny, 1772 S. H;tst~; Street; Arc~
Scrvice Statiun, 1037 W. Ball Ruad; Avis Rant-a-Car System, 1400 S Harbor Blvd.; Mubile
S~rvice Statiun, lAUO S. Harbur BIvJ.; Sh~ll Servi~e Station, 2104 S. Harbor Blvd; Texaco
Service Station, 100 W. Katella Avenue; and Muhil Service Station, l00 E. Katella Way, a
qualitied envirunmental professional, retained by d~a property owner!developer, shall attempt
ro contact the current andlor known former prop~rty/business owners to ubtain information
regardin6 the status of USTs and/or tank cl~isures at th~se sites. lf warrante.i, subsurface
investigation and samplinb sh:dl he undertaken by a yualiti~l envircinmental prof~,ssional, and
resutts of these analyses shall b~ submitted tu the Fire nepartment for review and approval.
Apprc~priate remediation measures will be dev~loneJ, it' ~ecessary, hefore demolition, excavation
or grading take pl~ce in thesc are.~.s.
MitiYati~n Measure 3. jQf . Prior tu approval rt' the tirst graJing plan ~~r issuance of the first
demolitiun permit, whichevcr occurs tirst, un the SG-acr~ par~el lucated in the southeast portion
of the Analieim Resort Specitic Pl;in area, s~veral reprrsentative samples of shallow soils shall
be collected and analyzed hy a yualitie~ envimmnental profes.r•iona! for the property
uwner/develo, er ti~r pesticide anJ herhicide residve. If soils containin~ ~iesti~;ides or herbicides
atwvc: rogulated limits are tound, remedial actiuhs shaU bc carricxl out before any disturbance
to the suils occurs. Remulial actiun~ shuulJ ~unxist uf removal anJ dispusal or treaunent of
~ffecteJ soils acconling to all applicahle Iocal, statr, and fecleral regulations.
Mitiratian Measure 3.10-7. Ongoing durinb projc~t Jemnlitic-n anJ cunstructic~n, in the evens
that h:u.uduus waste, inclwlin~; ashestu~, ix discovered during site preparation or construction,
the ~roperry uwnerlJ~vel~~per shall emure that the iJ~ntitied hvardous waste and/or hazardous
material are hanJleJ anJ Jispc-s~~J uF in th~~ rn,~nncr ~,ie~ific~J Ly the `. ~ uf California
I~azarJuus Suhstances Cuntrul Law (Hcalth ~nJ Saf'ery Cod~, nivision 20, Chapter 6.5), and
according to th~ rey~i-•emems uf the Caliti~rnia Adminixtrativ~ C'c>Je, 'i'itle 30, Chaptcr 27.
3.11 Visuai Rcsourc~~2d A~~I~etics
3.i1.1 potential Signi t~aot Im~~. The pru}ect•sptcitic anJ cumula~ive impac~c ui the Project un
visual ratourcks anJ aes~heti~: arc Jis~ussecl in Sectiaax 3. l I anJ 4. i I uf ~he EIR.
'i'}:e juxcapasition ~-f the Jiff~r~nt lanJ u~ex in anJ ar~-und thc Anahcim Ft~.sc~rt Specific i'lan area,
atthough c~nt~mpl:,~rJ by chc C:ity uf An:~heim General F'i~n, ~rc~tc~~ ~he ~HKential fur visual imp:~eG~ to
uJ~~CCOI (1~U(1~'fi1C3 ,l.i IJfllI U~CS IflI~OXlfy' WII~I tIC^clup:ncnt un4cr the Anah~im Reccnt Specific F~lan and
rclatal projetts, ih~lwling lucs ot urcn •racc, int~n~iti~atinn ~rf the ~+rban skylint, an~J patcntial
sh~de/~hadc-w impactx t~f adja~rnt prupcrty. AQ~litian:illy. .ippr~iximately SG acre.~ in the urotheutern
~ ~ux:.•t~Y~.i~~rnW ~u• .i •a•t-
-nl- I'l:')•f-ll.i
portion of the Anah~im Resurt Spe~itic Plan area (and ~~~t,~r n.ircelti at'fectul hy relate.J prujects) is
currendy upen farmland design~ued as an ;i~ricultural prtserv~, Whild spe~itic details of future
d~velopments within rhese areas are nut yet knuwn, th~r~~ is ih~ potential for signiticant visual impacts
to aJjacent residenr.ial properties.
Construction activities associated with the Project and relatul proj~cts will create visua!
disruption while proposed roadway and public infrastructure imhruvements are eompletecl. This will
include removal oti some IanJscaping, gradind, demulitiun of existing structures, and other infrastructure
ar,d l~uilJing constructiun.
No other signiticant impacts rclat~l tu visual resuurces and aesth~tics are anticipute,~.
3.11.2 j',inefin~s. impacts xssociat~l with visual resources and aesthetics have been mitigatuf to the
extNnt feas~ble, but will not be reducecl to a level uf insigniticance. T'o thc extent feasible, cliang~.s or
alterations hava been required in, ~r inc;urporated inro, the Pruject which mitigate or avoid the significant
efCects on the environmcnt r~lating to visua! resources and aesthetics.
3.11.3 E r R' ~r~trt of ~iadinps, 'The Jiscussiun anJ analysis in Sections 3.1 I and 4.1 l of the EIR
explain the foregoing tinJings and con~lusinns. Unavuidable signiticant visual resoures and aesthetie
impacts are discussed furthrr in Sectiun 4.8 h~luw in this du~:ument.
'flse Project wil! hav~ beneticial visual ~ind aesthetic impacts as a result of the extensive
landscaping, design features and Jevelo~ment stanJards and guid~lines pr~~vided in the Specific Plan. As
a whole, the visuat and aesthetic yualiry uf th~ area is expecteJ to h~: enh:~nced by the Project.
Plith the intensitication ut development which is oxpe~red tn occur under the Praject and related
project~, however, including the putential Jevclopment uf upen agricultural fields, unaveidable viaual and
a~.cthetic impacts un ad~acent properties will o~:cur.
lmplementation ~~f the followin6 mitigsition measurc~ will scrvo to Iessen or avoid project impac~t
un visual resourecs and acsthetic~.
~jt~~tion tite~r~3.ll-1. Priar tu i~suan~e c~t' e:+ch buildinl; p~rmit, the prop~rty
owner/develuper shall xuhmit rlanx whi~h iliustrate ~hat ~I! m~chanical ~:yuipment and trash area~
for the subject building(~? will be scre~rn~J t'rum aJja.cnt publi~ str~ets and adjacent resideotial
area.e. Screeninb xhall be install.al priur tu linal building an~! cunin6 ins~iection.
Miti~,ation Mca~ure 3.1!•2. Friur tu isxuanec ~-t e~ch huiiJing permit, tht ~:ropeRy
o~vn~rldcvelopcr sh~tl suhmit a IanJsc;+r~ ~nd irrig,~ti~~n plan tu th~ Planning Depanmcnt and
Utilitie~ O~panmc~~t, whi~h sh:-n n~ r~~r~~~:d ynJ ~~rtilied hy a licen~ul lanJscapa ~rchitc~:t.
i +trx~rau~u~.,MUM nra~-.i •45-
_r,~- hC!-,5-1 t.t
The land;a~ape plan shall include a phasing plan for tl:t instxllation and maintenance of
landscaping ~.~sociated with that building permi! and sh~li be in conformance with the Water
Efticiency Lan:iscape Ordinance.
The irrigation plan shall specify methods for monitoring the irrigation system. The system shall
ensure that irrigatian rates do not exceed the infiltratiun of local soils, that the application of
fertilizers and pesticides do not exceed appropriate levels of ftequencies, and that surface runoff
and overwatering is minimizal.
The landscape a~d irrigation plar~s shall include water-conserving features such a.s low flow
irrigati~n hf;ads, automatic irrigation scheduling equipment, tlow sensing conttols, raii~ sensors,
soil moisture sensurs, and other water-conserving equipm~nt. In addition, all irngation systems
shall be designed so that they will fi~nction properly with reclaim~ water, once a system is
available.
~,.~~atio.o ~easure 3.11-3. Prior to the submittal of each final sit~ plan, ~~e property
owner/developer shall submit a shade anJ shadow analysis to the Planning Department for
review and approval demonstrating that d~e proposed structure(s) wuuid not create significant
shade and shadow impacts on adjacent land uses. A significant sh~de and shadow impact would
accur when o~~tJoor active areas (r.g., eating area.e along Harbor Boulevard, hotelimotel
swimming pools, and residential tront and back y~uds) or strucC.~res thai i~~clude sensitive use~
(e.g. residences) have windows diat narmally receive sunlight are covered by shadows for more
than 50 percent of d~e sunlight hours. If the analysis identifies shade and/Qr shadow inipact~
would occur anJ Cie builciing setback, architectural maRSia~ and landscape ret~uirements/provi-
sions stt fotth in ,ec:tion 5.0, D~,sign Plan of the Anaheim Re.aort Specific Plan, do not funetion
;u fcasible mitigation measures, additional technical review of the structure(s) wiil ba requ~recf.
~jRj,~ation Mrasure 3.11~. Prior tu the final building and zonirig inspectiUn, or whenaver
estabtishcd; anJ, on an ung~ing basis, thc propeRy uwnechteveloper ahall participate in an
~xsrssment d'-cuict for landscape installation and maintenanct if one is establishec! for the
Anaheirts Resort.
~uon ~,~,~ure 3.1--~. Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the pr~perty
uwner/developer shall submit plans which o:tail the Iighting system for ar~y parking facilities
adjacrnt to resideutial qr light-scnsitive uses. 'Chc system4 shall be design~i a~xl maintainecf in
such a mannrr as to conce.~ light u~urces to th~ sxtent fea~ible to minimtze light xpillagc and
glare tr the adjacent uses. 1'he plans shall be preparsYf and ~ignect by a licensal elrctricaJ
enginrxr. wich a letter trom thc enginecr stating that. in the opinion of the ~ngineer, this
requirement hac bten met.
i.~ncx-s~t~^.~~o.w.au~~.~vc~.c -•f!i-
_~~ ;_ p(:!1,1-1 l3
3.12 Cultu~~urces
3.12.1 ~,@~~I Sis±nificant lmnac;ts, The project-s~ecitic and cumulative impacts c~f the Project on
culwral cesuurces are discussed in Sections 3,12 and 4,1Z uf the EIR. Thcre are no signiticant project-
specific or cumulativz impacts un culti.~ral resuurces.
3.12.2 ~indines. Therc are no signiticant Project-specitic or cumulative impacts un culbaral resources.
3.12.3 Fa~ts in SuDqort of Fin4fines. '1'hr discussiun and analysis in Sactions 3.12 and 4.12 of the SCR
explain the fore~oing tindings and conclusiuns. Past surveys havc; uncovered nu evidenca of cultural,
historic or prthistoric rc:sources, and no signit~cant impacts are ancicipatecl. However, the following
mitigation measures h;~ve nunetheless been incorpursted into the Analieim Resort Specitic Plan Project
to minimize potential disturbance to as-y~t urdiscovered resuurces diat may b~ ~nwunt~red during futur~
development activisy.
~],j~ig, ti~n Measure 3~12.1. Prior tv aprroval uf each grading plan, the property
ownerld~veluper shall submit a letter to th~ Puhl ic Works/Engineering Department, Devalopment
Services Uivision, and the Planning Department, Planning Divisian, identif~~ing tl~e certified
ai•chaeulugist that has been hir~d to ~nsur~ that the ti~lluwing actions ar~ implemented:
a. Ttie archaeologist n~ust be present at the pregradinb conference in or.ier to ~stablish
prr~cedures fur tempurarily haltin~; ur redirecting work to perinit the sampling,
iJentification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered.
If artifacts are uncover•_d xncl detcrmined to l~e signiticsnt, the a~c;haeological observer
;hall determine appropriate actions in cc~nperation with thc property owneridevelc-p~r for
explorati~m and/or salvage.
b. Specimens that are ~ollected rriur to or during the; grading process will be donatecl to an
appropriate rducatiunal or research institutiun.
c. Any :+rehaeological wcirk at thce site shall be conducteJ under the directi~m of tfee ceRitied
arch~~u~lugist. If any artifacts aro ~liscuvercd durin6 grading operatiuns when th~
archa~lo~ical monitor is nut pres~nt, grading shall be diverte~f arounJ the are~ urstil the
monitar ~an survr.y the are~~.
d. A tina! report Jctailing the finJing~ anil disp~-sitiun of the sp~cimens shall be submitteci
tu tha City Engin~er. Upcm u>rnpldtiun uf thr graJing, th~ archawlogist shall notify the
City :~.ti to wl~~n th~ tinal repurt wili h~ suhmitteJ.
~ ~ua.'~~s~~i~rw~uN ~~a•~•i -47-
_ ~~.~ _ PC J 4 -1 l .i
Mitiet~j,on Measure_~,.j.~?.-.,~'. Priur tu a~+proval uf each grading plan, the property
owner/d~v~luper shall s~hmit a letter tu the Public Worf:s/Bnglne~ring Department, Developn~nt
Services Division, ~ncl the Planning Department, Planning Uivision, identit'yi~g the certitied
paleontologist that has been hir~d to ensure that the follawing actiuns are implemented;
a, 'C'he paleontalogist must be present ~t the pregrading conference in order to establish
proc~clures to temporarily halt or re~lirect work to permit the sampling, identiflcation,
and evaluation of fossils if potentially signiticant palecmtological resuurc~ are uncoverecl.
If artifacts are uncovered and foun~l w be signiticant, the paleontological observer shall
determine a, propriate actions in cooperation with tht proprrty owner/d~veloper for
exploration and/or salvage.
b. Specim~ns that are collected priuc tu or during the grading process will b~ donated to an
appropriate educatioiial or research institution,
a Any paleonwlo~ical wurk at the site shall be cunducted under the direction of the
certitied paleunr~logist. If any tiissils are disccrvered during grading operations when the
paleontological monitur is not present, grading sfiall be diverted arounJ the area until the
monitor can survey the area.
d. A tinal repor~ detailing the tindings anu dispositionof th~ specimens shall be submitted.
Upon completion of the 6rading, th~ p~ileontologist shall nutify the City, as to when the
final report will be submitte~.
3.13 ~p r~,}(
3.I3.1 P~tenti~!.~i~nificant lmnact.ti, The project-specitic and cumulative impacts uf die Project on
energy usage are cliscussed in Sections 3.13 and 4.13 uf the EIR. Additional discussion of electricity a~d
natural gas usay,e is provided in Sections 3.9.9 and 3.9.IU of the ~fR.
Without conservatiun measures, ~nergy a~nsumptiun associated with buildout of the Ana~ieim
Resort Specitic Plan and related prujects could h~ cunsicl~r~d sibniticart. N~ othc;r si~nificant energy
consumption impacts would occur.
3. ~3,2 Finding,g, Chan~es or alterations hav~ been required in, or incorporatecl into, the Project which
mitigate or avoid the significant effacts on the envirc~nment rel;~ting tu energy.
3.13.3 FacLg in $~r~art of Findinc~. Tha ~iscussion anJ analysis in Sectinns 3.4 and 4.4 c~f the EIR
explain the foreoaing tindings and cunclu~iuns. See Sectiurs 3.14 ut' the ~IR for aJditional discussiou
i ~norsuuauwrn~-nnn~.nrrui -48-
-GS-
pC94-113
rega:ding construction impucts. A~l~itiun;il ~liscussiun ut impacts assuciated with usage uf electricity and
natural gas is proviJ~d in Sections 3.9.9 and 3.9,10 ot the ~IR.
Although Jevelopment associated with the Pruject an~l related projeccs wif! consum~ substantial
amo~mts of motor vehiale fuel, electricity (see Sectiun 3.9,9), and nsitural gas (see Section 3.9,10), tha
proposecl usage is consistent with the assu-ned usage undc;r upproved plans and pol3cies. Implementation
of die mitigation measure set forth below and th~ measures stated in Section 3.9.9 and 3.9.10 of these
Findings would reduce energy usage impacts tc, a level that is less than signiticant.
1_v(itie~tion_ Measure 3.13-1. Prior to issu:tnce of each building permit, ihe propai~ty
owner/developer shall ~femonstrate on plans that fuel-efficient riodels of gas-power~.l building
equipment hav~ been incorporated into the pruject, to th~ extent feasible.
3.14 CURSh'UCtion fmnac~
3.14.1 Potenti~l Significant ~m~cts. The r.roject-specitic and aumulative impacts of the Project relatecl
to construction activities are discussed thrc~ughout the EIR in connection with relevant impact categories,
and are summarized in Section 3.14 of the FIR.
As dis~ussed ~bove in chese tindings, pucentixlly signiticant construction impacts include:
A. L«tnd U~e omp;~, ihilitv. Lung-term cumulative construction impacts on land use are
consitierecl ~ibnificant due th~ ad.jacency of existing resi~lences to Jevrlopm~nt sites within ~he Snecific
Plan area.
B. • r~ xtaticm and C'~I~~~. Disrupti:~n and cungestion of streets and intersections
produced by construction activities pursuant ro th~ Specitic Plan and related projects would be significant.
C. l/1i ,~u itv. Even with all feasihle mitigation me;-sures, peak day construction emissions
on both a Project-specitic and cumulative basis arc; a~:pected to ~xceed SCAQMD thresholds for ROG,
NOx, Cn, and PM l0. Cumulative cunstructiun emistiicros of SOx may also ba sign;ficant.
D. [Voise. No~se from constructicin activities pursuant to th~ Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
wilt be significant on a Project-specitic and rumulative hasis. Eren with all feasible mitigation me:jsures,
noise from constnictiun activities in and arou;,~l the specitic p~an area wiU be signiticant. C~nstn~ction
activity in connection with h~ildout under th~: :~~recitic plan is anticipated to occur over the lb-year period
from 1994 t~~rough ZG:O, with the maj~~rity n~ activity hetween ~00~ and 201U. Construction adjacent
to any one la~:ation, ho:vever, will be ;~f shorte ~luration (gen~rally six munths or less). !n ge~eral, naise
levrls will va:y from 7~9 dBA to 88 dBA t'rom :i0 fect away durinb the erection phase of constructior!.
I:~IK1G[LSI:L111'4MDEAADM.AZC~~1 -~9'
-GG- ~'G94-1 i3
Maximum outdoor noise Ic;vels at resi~ences 100 t'eet frum the constructwn site could b~ as high as 85
dBA. This will b~ an unavuidahle signiticant impact.
E. $yJ,~ Wasta, Demolition ~lebris and oth~r construction-r~lated solid wastes could be
significant in li~ht of limited landtill capacity,
F, Surface Hyclrology,(Storm D~ains, Short-term impacts from silt-laden and contaminated
runnff from constniction sites could occur without mitigation.
G. Visual ancl Aes betic Resc, ry~r ~, Construr.tion activities associated with the Project and
related projects will create visual disru; tion whiie proposed roadway and public infr~~structuce
in~provements are completed. This will inclucle removal of somN landscaping, gradmg, demolition of
existing structurN.s, and other infrastructure and building constructian.
3.14.2 Tlnd= inQ4. '1'o the extent feasible, changes ~~r alterations have been re~uired in, or incorporated
into, the Project which rnitiga;e or avoid tlie signiticant effects on the environment refating to
construction. Construction impacts will, however, remain unavoidably significant.
3.14.3 racts in Support of rindinQ~, The discussion and analysis af cnnstruction impacGS throuehout
the EIR explain the foregoing tindings and ~onclusions. See Section 3.14 of the EIR for additional
discussion c~garding construction impacts. Unavoid~-bly signiticant construction impacts are discusseci
furd~er in Sectinn 4.9 below in this document.
Construction-related mitigation me~~sures are listed above in this document in connection with
specitic impact categories. These measurc;s will lessen the impacts, but not to below a level of
signiticance.
i:~oocs~ec~~no~rbu~ow~.nzcui -SO-
-(ii- PC~4-11 i
s~c.~~~orv a.u
UNAVO[DALtLE SIGNIFICANT lMPACTS
The potential signiticant adverse impacts associatecl with the adoption of the An~~tieim Rt;sort
Specitic Plan which cannot be avuided by the adoption of feasible mitigation measures or praject
alternatives are described and analyzed helow, Th~ Anaheim City Council tinds that these potentiai
signiticant adverse i~rpacts would he reduced with the implementation of the recortimended mitigation
measures; however, the impacts cannot bc; recluced to a level !~ss ehan signiticant. The Anaheisn City
Council will adopt a Statement uf Overriding Considerations pursuant to S~ction 15093 af the CEQA
Guid~lines. 'I'he Statement of Overriding Consi~leratiuns is included as Sectiun 7.0 of this dor,ument.
4.l LAI~ID USE-RELATED PL!-NS A1JD POLICIES
4.1.1 SJnavoi ^ i SiLnificant Im~~,,.. 'I'he 56-acre agricultural kield locat~ci in the southeasterri
portion of the Anaheim Resurt Specitic Plan area is categurized as prime agricultural iancl by the
California Department of Conservation on the Important Farm Land Series Map. The loss of agricultural
land will re~tuce the land available for food production, specitically for the production of strawberries,
basecl on the most recent crop cultivated. The pruperty own~r has tiled a notice of nonrenewal Af the
agricultural preserve status of the property with the State, The EIR demanstrates that tl~e loss af the tield
within the Specific Plan area will result in less than ;t 0.2 percent reduction of the land currently
cultivated for strawberry production in the State; nevertheless, loss of any prime a~;ricultural land is
considered a signiticant project impact hy the Caliti~rnia Oepartment of Conservation. Additionally,
because of the loss of agricultural land throughouc Orange Cc~unry and the State of California due to othec
developm~nt projects, the Ioss of the prime agricultural land is considered a signiticant cumulative impact.
There are no other unavuidably signiticant impacts to land use - related plans and policies.
4.1.2 ' in , With respect to the luss of agricultural lancl, specitic cconomic, legul, social,
technological, or o;her considerations, including consi~lerations for the provision of employment
opportunities for highly trained work~rs, make infeasihle the mitigation mea~ures or alternatives identitied
in the .Environm~ntal Impact Report.
4.1.3 ~jL~~,~ort of Findines. There ar~ no feasihle mitigation mcasures or alternatives available
to mitigate the potential loss of prime farmlan~l in the Specitic Plan area. The owner of the 56-acre
parcel currendy in agricultural production has nuticed the Williamsun Act contract covering d~e parcel
for non-renewal, and the contract will theretirre expire on March 1, 2000. Vdhether the parcel will be
continued in agricultural produ~;tion beyond that date is a decision which can only be made by the
property owner.
I:\pp(:S~Sf?C111~b'OAAAUAI,n2l'IJI -5 ~'
-~7s- ~~~'.~)~S-i1J
~4.2 LAND USE CUMPA'I'IE3ILITY
4.2.1 ZJnavc~i~ablc Significant Im ,~~ ~. Unavoi~ahly signiticant land use compatibility impac:ts consist
of (i) juxtaposition and proximity of commercial and residential land usc;s; (ii) loss of prime agricultural
I~nd; and (iii) Projcct and cumulative construction impacts un adjacent land uses.
~1,2:Z Fiodines. The project-specitic and cumulativ. sibniticant environment~~l impacts related to larsd
use incompatibilities have been mitigateJ to the extent feasible by incorporation of the mitig~tion
measures identitiecl in this document, With respect to the unavnidahly significant land use compatibility
itnpac~s, specitic economic, legal, social, technological, or c~ther consideratio~s, including considerations
fr~r the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation
m0asures or alternatives identitied in !he Environmental [mpact Report,
4.2.3 ~ctg in Sunnort of Findingy. Land use com~~atibility impacts ro residences loc,rteri within and
on the periphery of the Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan area will be signiticant ~lue to the anticipated
intensificatian of commercial uses (primarily hotels and mote!s) within the Analieim Resort. 'fhe
commercial development will occur in areas which ar~ already designated Cummercial Recreation by t~tie
City of Anaheim General Plan Land U~e Element, and represents a continuation of the logical and orderly
devalopment of th~ urea. 'The mitibation mc:asures idzntitied in the E[R and the design guidelines and
development standards Qf the Specitic Plan will buffer and reduce to thc; extent feasible th~ land use
incompatibilities associated with futur~; hotel parking structures and buildings. However, the
intensification of commercial uses adjacent to residential areas tivill unavoidably lead to visual disruption,
construction noise and increased vehicle traftic as identitiecl in the EIR. Construction activities on
adjacent parcels will affact not only residential uses, but adjac~nt commerciaf, industrial and public uses
as well. These im~acts could be reduceJ, hut not to trelow a level of signiticance, by adoption oF the no-
project or lower intensity ~Iternatives. `fhose alternative~, hawever, ~ire infeasible for the re•rsons set
forth in Section 5.0 below in tliis decument.
A,s discussed in Section 4.1.3 of these Findings, there :;re no fea~ible mitigation measures or
alternatives which would avoid the potential loss of tiie 56-acre agricultural ti~ld should the property
ow~ser choose to cease :.gricultural production.
4.3 7'RANSPORTATION AI+ID C[RCf1LAT[ON
4.3.1 ~navaid~ble Siknificart Imp~. The unaviiidahle signiticant impacts on transportation and
circulation consist of the following:
A. Unavoidable signiticant Year 201U impacts may occur at thz following four intersections
even with completicin uf ~~II feasible transportauun and circulatiun impruvements:
i:+oocs~sec+u~oroa,~noM.n~a~~ai -52-
_(,g_ PC94-l13
o Hurbur Bc~ul~v;ird and Bxll R~~~~~ w Anah~im BIvdJHaster Str~eta~dKatelia Avenue
• Hastee Street and Oran~;ewoo~l Av~nue • L~wis Street and Katella Av~nue
B, In the event that the transportation and circulation improv~ments ide~lified in the EfR,
includi~g improveme~ts whfch are part of Caltrans' I-5 widening program or OCTA's Katella Smart
Street pro~ram, are not completed as anticipatul in a timetable commens~rate wfth the pace of
development under the Anahuim R~sort Specitic Plan, chen additic~nal unavoi~abl~ significant impacts on
lev~ls of service at the stucly (nters~ctions may result,
C. In the aggregate over the 16-year buildout period from 1994-2010, t~mporary disruption
and congestion of streets and intersections resulting from construction of street imnrovements and
inclividual development projects will be signiticant and unavoidable.
4.3.2 ' in ,'The projeet-specitic and cumulative sibniticant environmental hnpacts related tc
transportation and circulationl~ave been mitigated to the extent feasible hy inr.orporationof the mitigation
measures identitieci in this document, With respect to the unavoidably signiticant Irnnsportation and
circul~tion impacts, speciticeconomic, legwl, sacial, technological, or other consid~rations, includir.g
consideratiuns for the nrovisfnn ot employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible
the ntitigation measures or allernatives id~ntitied in th~ Enviranmental Impact Report,
4.3.3 Facts in_SuPport of rindinQS. '~'he City's stafi' and consulting engineers h~vo det~rminetl that
there are no feasible improvements capablr of maintaining adequate levels uf sec•vic~ntfour interseatians '
(Harbor Boultvard ancl Ball Road; Anaheim Blvcl./Haster Str~et and Katella A.v~nue; flaster Street and
Orangewood Avenue; Lewis Street anu Katella Avenue) with buildout of the Proj ~ct, related projects and
background traftic increases in the year 2U10.
~
In d~e event that thelransportation and cir~ulation improvements identitiecl in~ie C;IR, including
improvements which ar~ part of Caltrans' 1-5 widening program or OCTA's Kalella Smart Straet
program, are not compl~ted ~~s anticipat~d in a timetable comm~nsurate with the paco of development
under the Anaheim ResoR Speciti~ Plan, then additional unavoidabl~ significant impacts an levels of
s~rvice at the study intersectiuns may result. Bec;-use c>f th~ cost oF the improvemenls, amounting to tens
of millions uf dollars, th~ycannot feasibly he comnleted by the Cit,y if the anticipate~County and State
t~ncls do not become avaiL~ble as planned. Burdening new development with ~he cost of these
improver,ients would inhibil construction and c~iuse the City to lose the job growth and economic
revitalization which is anticlpated from the Pruj~cc.
In the aggregate over the 16-year huildc+ut period from 1994-2010, ternporary disruption and
congestiun of streets and intersections resulting frum amstruction of street improvem~nls an~J individual
development projects will besigniticant and unavoidahle. This disruptiun and cong~:slion will be lessaned
i nna:sur•.c~aiwaoe~nont.nzrri i -53-
-70- PC9h-113
tu th~ extent t'c:i.eihl~ hy th~ mitigatiun measurex iJentitie~ ~n this Jucumrnt, hut is an inevitablc result
of canstn.tition activity.
The foregoing unavoidable impacts ~uuld ,~otentially be r~lucc~l, but not to bclow a level of
significance, by aJuption of the no•pr~~ject or lower intensicy alternatives. '(hose alternatives, however,
are infea,cible fur th~ reas~ms set furth in Sectiun 5.0 beliiw in this J<~cum~nt
4.4 AIR QlJALI'i'Y
4.4.1 f~,t~aynidable Sieni icant Imoac~4. Unavoidahle air yualitv impacts cunsist of tha following:
A. ~~l9n Emissions: ~ven with all fe:~ihle mitigatiun measures, peak day
cu:utniction ei9iissions on butl, s Project•specific anJ ~umulative h~tiis ere axpected to exceed SCA(2MD
thresholds for ROG, NOx, CO, and Ph110. Cumulative ~unstructiun emissions ~f SOx may also be
unavuidably significant.
9. ~~on~l Frnis.~iuns: Gven with all te:~sihle micigaciun measures, emissions from moror
vehicfe travel. utility asage, stat~onary suurc~~.s, and ~rnsi~e service engines asso:iated with develupment
unJer the Anaheim ~esort Specific Plan arc ~~°ne~.t~d ta+ erceeJ SCAQrAU thresholJs fi~r RfJG, NOa,
CO anJ PN110, both on a Pruject-specih. ..._ cumulacive ba~is. '1'hese ar~ impacts un regional air
yuality; no significant localizeJ air qualiry impacts will ~~c~ur.
4.4.2 Findin~. i'he pruject-spec:tic anJ cumulative ::igniticant envirunm4ntal impacts related to air
quality have been mitigatcJ to th. extent fea~ihle hy inu~r~~~-raticm ~rf the mitigation mcasures iJentifial
in this ducument. With re.spe~~t tv thz unavoiuahly .i~niticant air yuality impacts, specifi~ econc~mic,
I~~gal, social, technological. o~ o;h~r cunsiJcra~innx, incluJing umsider~tions for thc proviaion of
employment apportuniti~ for highly trai~~~~el wurkers, make i~~fea.~cible 1he mitigaticm me~ares or
alternatives iJentifieJ in the Fnvirar.mental li,ipact Rc~m.
4.4.3 Facts in Sua~art c~; t~incliny,4. f:ven with all 1'~atihle mi}igati~~n measur~.~, inten~ificatiun of
comme.rcial usex av contemplateel under the Anaheirn It~•.~~;t 5peci~c 1'lan will inevitably leacl t~
c~~mtructi~m and traftic cmi.siun~.
The Prc-ject is well Q.~xign~~l fr~rm :i regi~~nal air yuality plannin~ xtanJpc~int. Aa urnPrmert by
the F'i~~ject rev9ew «mJuc~«I by SCAG, the Anahcim i2e>urt Spaifi~: Pl~n proviclex ~ gnc-J e~ample of
~sing ~lanning ta achi~eve re~icmal air qu~liey g~~ala, hy, far in.bn.e, cuncentrating ner- devei~~men:
~rc~unJ exiatir~L re~icma~ ~ttivity centrra, 'fhc Spe~itic Plan ~vill acc~~mm~~late hatel/rtu~tel demuul from
vi~itlrrs f~~ the aJja~•ent :k~ivity :entet. (e.g. An:-h¢im C~~nventiun Ccmrr. Disneyla~xl Rc~nrt), thereby
contrihuting ~~i in:rea.inS length. af +tay ar~l reJucir~~ ~-verali vac+~i~.n ~rivcl in the regian.
t-tr14'1D~dFlva wrru ~ e1M ~7i' ~~ .~') .
"j.
~' l .'.) ~~ - 1 ~ .1
The unavo9dabie air qaality impacts couid potentially be reducecl, but nut to below a Ievel of
signiticance, hy adoption ot the no-projer.t ~r {ower intensity alternatives. 'C'hose alternatives, however,
are infeasible for the re:uon.g set forth in 5ecti~~n S.0 below in this Jocument.
4.S NniSE
4.3.1 SJnuvaiduble Sisnifi~l Imoa •. 'il~e fullowing unavoidable noise impacts would occur:
A. ~,~t~Q.f~g: Even with all f~ible mitigation measures, noise from constniction
activicies in ~nd around the Specific Plan area will be significant.
B. On~cptlonaE No)se: Noise from increased vehiculaz traftic aesociate~l with relateJ
projects and background traf(ic growth in combination with the Project will be cumulatively and
unavoidably signific:u~t alung two sueet segmenG~ in the tra~c study area in the Year ZOW anct along nine
segments in the Year 2010.
4.5.2 ~j~,q. 'Il~e project-specific c~nd cumulative significant environmental impact~ relnted to noiae
have been mitigated to the extent fcasible by incorpotatiun of the mitigation meaiures identified in this
ducument. Witli respect to the unavoirlably significant noige impactq, specitic econornic, legal, social,
techn~logical, or other :on.siderations. including cvr~tderations for the provision of empl~yment
opportunitfes for highly vainnl workers, make infr.a~iblc thc mitigation measures or al-ernativ~ identified
in the Environmental lmpact Report.
•f.5.3 I~~cts in uR~~J Findi~. ~ven with all f~~ible mitigation meawrex, intensificat9cn of
commescial uses ~s contempl~tat ander the Anaheim Resort Spaific Plan will inevit~bly Ieacl to
significant cor~wction ancf cunwiative traftic noise inereasea. Further limitations on the hours ar-d noise
levels pr.rmitted fi~t constn~c~tion activitiea would ic~srease thr. expense involved in constnrction. ~nd would
therefor~ ;r,hibit ~he job growth ancf econamic revitalization which the Cit,y is anticipating from the
Fn-jecc.
The unamidable noise impacts couid patentialty be ralucal, hut not to below a level of
signiti~ance, by ulartir~ri of 1he no-project or lower interuity altern~tivex. Those alternnivea, however,
are infqsible for the reaaoru~ set fonh in Srction S.0 b~bw in this doc-~mr+.~
1.6 50[.tD WASi'Y, C11SP05AL
4.6.1 ffnaroi ble ~aant Imno~, ~ut~e ot limited landfill c~uity, thr. quantity r~f ~colid
wute ar.neratod by rnnscrucsion and operuion uf develupment urxfer the Anaheim Resort 5pecific M~
anJ rel~tocf pn~jects will be unavoidably sigr~l(icant.
i rx~xur•.am-ww~va-.i -SS•
I'c'.t~•1-1 1 .i
4.6.2 j~p~jpy,g. 'Che project-specific and cumulative significant environmenta! impacts relatcxl to solid
wa~te have been mitigatecf to the extent feasible by incorporation of the mitigation mea.aures identifial
in this document. With respect to the unavoidably significsnt sAlid wa.gte impact~, sp~cific economic,
legal, social, technological, or other c~nsiderations, including considerations foK the prc~visinn uf
employment op~wrtunities for highly trainecl workers, make inf'easibie the mitigation measures or
altcrnatives identifieJ in the ~nvironmental (mpact Report.
4.6.3 Facts in Suouor ot ~ndines. New development inevita~ly leads to increases in solid waste
generation. Landi'ill space is limitecl.
Although d~e feasihility of recycling and other waste stream roduction measures is increasing,
measures requirec! to reduce solid waste generation t~ a level of insigrtiticanc.e cannot be feasibly achiev~xf
at this time. The City's e.cisting waste m;uiagement program and the mitigation measures identifiecf in
the EIR will recluce solid watte cc~nsiderably, but n~t to a!evel of insignificance.
The extent of demalition activity within the Specific Plan area cannot bc predictecl. (f demolition
is substantial, impact~ uf the debris on limited landfill capacity could be unavuidahly significant.
'Che unavoidable solid waste impacts could potentially be rrducc~J, but not to b~low ~t level of
significance, by aduption of the no-project or low~r intensity alternative,~ 'fhose alternatives, l~owever,
a~e infea~ible fur the rea~ons set forth in Section S.0 below in this docu~~-ent.
4.7 SCHOOIS
4.7.1 Una~ b~ te S f6eun~lma~. The need for additional school facilities because of new
student generation to the Anaheim City School Disuict ("ACSD") and the Anaheirs~ lJnion High Schuof
District ("AUHSD") from housetiolds relocati~ig w Qie jurisdiction of th.nse district- because ot
emplnyment opportunitie~s creatal by development under tbe Anaheim Reaort Sp~xific Plan a~xi the relatod
projects will be unav~idably aignitlcant. Projxtod uhool facilitiea feea $enecated by commercial and
re.tidential development direcUy ancl inciicectly asaociatal with the Anaheim Reao:t Specir~c Plan will wt
c~}ver the cost to the school .iistricts projectat frum new students.
4.7.2 ~}jp~. The proj~t•apecifcc and cur.n~lative siAnificant envircmmental impacta relattxi to
schuols I~ave been miti~atecf to the eztent feaafble by incorporatiun of the mitigatir,-rt mcasures identified
in this ducument. Wfth reapect to ehe unavoidably signiticant schc~ol impacu. specific economic, legal.
soci:J, technulugic~l. c~r other a~naiJeracions, including coruiderations for the provision nf employment
~~ppurtunitiu~ for h;gbly trainai workerx, make infcaaible tt~e mitigation mcasurd; or alternativea identifiaf
in the Er~vimnmcntal (mpacc ttepc-rt.
i ~~xu~rars•.~ ~u~++,~~~,„ -56-
',;_ PC:~,1- 1 l.i
4.7.3 ~.;1cts in ~~L~.Lif Findincs. 5~huul I'acilitirs tL•es ~m nc;w devel~~pment are set hy the Califurnia
Statc: Legislature, '11iu t'act that in s~~m~ instan~es th~ise fc:es may be inadeyuate to Fully offset the
facilities coscs resulting J~cectly ur indiractly t'rom the new dNVelopmcnt indicates a determination by the
Stat~ Legislatur~ that higher fe~s or other mitigatiun is infcasible in light of competin~ social and
econoiT-ic interests, sucli a.s job creation an~! ~cunumic productivity. Th~ City uf Anaheim also finds that
to impose additional fees an~! mitigatiun relatul to this Pruject, assuming it had thz puwer w Jo so, would
be infeasible becaus~ uf its inhibirory effect un the juh creatinn and econumic revitalization anticipated
as a result of the Hroj~:ct.
The unavoidable schuol impacts cuuld putentially be reJuceJ, but not to below a level of
signiticance, by aJoption uf the n~i-project ur low~r intensity alternatives. Those alte~natives, however,
are infeasiblo for the reasons set furth in S~ction S.0 beluw in this document.
4.8 VISUAL RESOURCES AND AFS'CFIECICS
4.8.1 Unavo~~ le Si~r itic;u~t ImoacK.~. Th~ j~~xtapc~sitiun ot'the diff~rent land uses in and around the
Anaheim Re,eort Specitic Plan area, althuugh cont~mplated by the Ciry uf Anaheim General Plan, creates
the potentia! fc~r unavoiJably signiticant visual impacts tu adjacent pcopcrties as land uses intensify with
development under the Anaheim Resnrt Specitic PI.-n and related prrjects, including losa of open space,
intensification of the urban skytin~, and henential shade/shaJaw impacts tn adjacent prnpeRy.
Additionaliy, appruximately 56 acres in the sciutheastern ~ortiun af the Ana}ieim Resort Specitir. Plan a:ea
(and other parcels affe~te.~l by rclated prc~jects) is currently upen t'armlaud J~signatul as an agricultural
preserve. While specitic develupment Jet,~ils of futurc ~~vr.lopments within these ar~as are not yet
knoWrn, there is thta pc~tential t'ur un~vt;i~lahle signitica.it visual impacts tc- adjacent residential properties.
In addition, ~onstructiun activities assuciated with thc Praject and rrlated projecrs will cie2te
unavuidably signifi~ant visual disruptiun whil~ prup~tised ruaclway and public int'raswctur~ improvemcnts
are compteted. This will include remuval uf s~~m~ I,inds~aping, graJina, demoliii~~n uf existirsg stnictures,
and other infre.ctructu~e anJ huildinb ~:unreruceiun.
4,8,2 ~p~p~. The proje~t-sp~c-tic anu curr~ulativ~ signiticant envirunm~ntal impa~ts relatul tn visu.l
r~.~urces ~nJ aes!hetics hav~ be~n mitig,u«! tu the rxt~nt fe;uihl~ by inturpcir.~tion ot' tho mitigaeion
measures iJentified in tF~is du~ument. With r~xpc~t tu th~ uci~vuid•rhly ~igniti~ant visual and a~.sthetic
impacts, specific eccmr~mic, legal, sacial, technulugic:+t. ur uther ~~,nsiJc~ratiuns, incluJing consid~~rationc
for tht provisi~~n oC cmpl~rymtnt oppurtunitics ti~r highly~ tr:~incJ w~irkers, rnake inf~a~ible the mitigation
meisures nr altcrnativex iJcntiti~~l in thc Envirunmenr~l Impa~t kepurt.
d.8.3 F~cts ~n Sun,Q~~rt c~[ FindinL,~. Evr.n wi~h ali t~axihle mitigaeiun meawre~. :unstruction a~tivity
anJ the intenciticatian uf ~ummtrtial us~s a:c ~~~nt~mrlal~:t unJcr th~ Anal~~im Reaurt Sp~cifi~ {~lan will
intvitably IcaJ t~i signiti~:ant visuai Jisn~rti~+n an~t .han<<s in th~ aexthcti~ Iands~aRe. Only sever~ limits
J.~D~%.'f'.~Fl'4ti~~MAUN .~1~~ ~I 'S7'
_~'~ {~~..'~~~-T ~.~
on new developm~nt wuui~ avuid th~se im~~acts; xuch limits arn inl'nasihl~ hecaus~ th~y would preclude
th~ job gruwd~ and econumic rr.vitalizatiun xnti~ipatc~l by tha City frum thr. Project,
The unavoidable visual and aesthetic impacts ~;c~uld ~~s~tentially be reduced, but not to b~low a
I~vel of signiticance, by auoptiun of the no-pruject or lower intensity alternatives. Those alternatives,
however, ar~ infc;asible for th~ rzasuns sct ti~rth in Sectiun S.U beluw in this document.
4.9 CONS'Y'RUCT[UN IMPACTS
4.9.1 Unavuidable Sienificant lmnac,t,~. Cunstructiun impacts ara addr~ssul with each environmental
issue analysis above in th~s~ tindings, However, the t~~Iluwing signiticant unavoidable environmental
effects are anticipatcc! as a r~:sult of constructiun activities assciciat~J with the Project and relatu: projects:
A. j,g~ llse Co~~j~y. Lung-term cumeilative constniction impacts on land use ace
cunsidered significant due the adjacency ut' existing residences to development sites within the Specitic
Plan area.
B. ~rsa,pc~rtatipn and Circulation. Disruptiun and cungestion of streets and intcrsections
produc~l by construction activities pursuant tu th4 Sp~citic Plan and related projects would be signiticant.
C. Air O~J.~. Even with all t'eacible mitig:~tion measures, peak day constn~ction emis.~ions
on both a Project-specilic anJ cumulative b;ttiis are expected to exceed ~CAQMU thresholds fo~ ROG.
NOx, CQ, and PM10. Cumulative consvuctioiz ~missions nf 5Gx may also be unavoidably significant.
D. ~i . Noise from cunstructiun activiti~:s pursuant tu the Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan
will bo signi`cant on a Project-specitic and cumulative hasis. Even with all feasible mitigation measures,
nnise from cnnstructiun activities in and around the specitic pian area will b~ signitican[. Construction
activity in connection with builJout under the Specitic f'lan is anticipatul to nccur c~ver the l6-year perioJ
from 1994 through 20t0, witti the majuri;y of activity hetween 2000 and 2010. Construction aJ~acent
to any one Incation, huwever, will b~ ot' shurter duratiun (yener;tilly six moneb:: or less). !n general, noisQ
levcls will vary from 79 dBA tu 88 dBA fnm~ 50 t'~et away during che ere~tiem pha::: of constn-ction.
htazimum outdcx>r n:~ise fevels at residen~es 100 feet frum the ~onstructia~ site cc~ulc,' he a.s high sx 85
dCiA. This will be :~n un~vuidahle sibrziti~ant impact.
E. $s '~lid Wa~te. D~pN~tJing un th~ scu~e ~~f Jemulition activity, demulitiun Jebris and other
cunstruction-relatul solid w;tst~s may he unavaiJahly +igniticant in light uf limited landtill capacity.
F. ~,h~~~CdroloLylStarm [~rains. Sh~-rt-t~rm impa_cx fr~~m silt-loden and ccmtaminatcKl
runo(f from ~answcti~.m sit~s may bc unavuidahly ~igniti~ant.
~.,uxYU~~.UC~,+o~~ ~i.•,u -58-
__ti_ ('C~~1-113
G. :+[j~,3p,d A~tlh°~}s $5,~~~. Cunstruction activities associated with thr Proj~rt and
ralated proj~cts will create visual Jisruptiun while prup~zsed ruadway and public infrastructure
improvemen~s ara cc>mnleted. This wili inc(ude removal uf soma landscaping, grading, demolition of
existing structur~s, anJ other infrastructurc; an~l building construction.
~.9.2 Finding,g. The project-specitic and cumul;itive signiticant environmental impacts related ta
construction have been mitigatecl ro the extent feasible by inc~rporation of the mitigation measurP.s
6dentified in this document, With respect to the unavoidahly si~niticant construction impacts, spe~•ific
economic~ legal, social, technological, or uther consideration~, includin~ considerations for the provisiun
oF employment opportunities for highly trained workers, maku infeasible the mitigatian measures or
alternatives identitieci in tha Fnvironmental lmpa~ct R~port.
4.9.3 ~ in S-:n;~~t of Fi in . Even wit}: all feasibl~ mitiyatiun measures, constcuction activity
associateti with the intensification of commercial uses as conttmplated under the Anal~eim Resort Specific
Plar. will inevitably lead to signiticant disruptoon and associat~d construction impacts. Only severe limits
on new development woul~l avaid these in~pacts; such lirnits are infeasible becausc they woul~+ preclude
the jub g~owth anJ econnmic revitalization anticipated by the City from the Project.
7'he unavoidable cunstruction impa~•ts coul~l putentially be reJuced, but nen to below a level of
signiticance, by adoption of the no-project or lower int~nsity alternatives. Thos~ alternatives, nowever,
are infeasible for the reasons set forth in Sectiun SA helow in this document. ,
i ~uocs~sr~aw~xr~r.M.~z,•~.i •5')-
-7G•• !'C9d-113
SI:CTION 5
ALTGI2NATIVFS '~'O 'I'HE PROJE~CT
The F[R has eva{uated a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed Projec;t. Section 5.0
of the EIR pcovides detailed descriptions and analysis of each alternative in adequate detuil for a decision
on ~vhether the alternatives should be adopted in l~eu of the Project, ~.s well as an analysis of the
environmentally superior alternative.
5.1 NQ}-PRUJ~~T/CON'C[NUINC D~VELOPMENT AGTERNATIVC
S.LI D~e iution of Alter~utivg. Section 5.2 of uhe GIR describes and discusses the No-
ProjectlContinuingU~velopmentAlternative. ~ndertheNo-Project/ContinuingDevelopmentAlternative,
die Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would not be implement~cl, but the project area would continue to
de;velop under the existing I.md use controls and designations. Continuecl development and renovation
unJ~r these existing restrictions would be allowecl by right or as allowed by discretionary approval by
the City of Anaheim, degending on the types of acticro requeste.~l. Property ownersldevelopers may
cuntinue to Jovelup up to 75 units per parrel under a building permit as of right, but may scek additional
density under conditional use permit on a discretiunary batiis. It is assumecl duit continuin~ development
would uccur as allowecl by the G-R Zoning R~~;ulations. Additionally, individual property
uwncrs/Jevelopers would likely be subject to preparation of individual pmject GIR documt~ntation in urder
tu environmentally dear specitic developm~nts proposul within d~e Specitic Plan boundaries,
5.1.2 mdines. Specific economic, legal, so~~i~-l, technological, or other cunsiderations, including
amsi~lerations for die provision of employment oppc~nunities for highly trainul workcrs, mak~ infe~~sible
the No-Pruject/Continuinb Devclopment Alternativ~ identified in the EIR.
5.1.3 f;+~cts in {~w-rt of Findines. Because it may involve le;ss total new Jev~lopnisnt.
implementation of the No-Praject/Continuin; Deveiopment Altcrnativ~ might reduce some of the Project's
impacts that can be mitigatecl to a Icss than si~nificant level. However, unavoidehly signiticant impacts
similar to thuse of the proposecl ~'roject would still occur. More~ver, this altcrnative would not
implement many af the project beneti~~ anticipateJ with i~nplementation of the Anaheim Resort S~ecitic
Plan, inriud~ng enhancemsnt uf public improvements, landscaping and parkway enhancements,
cuordinatcxl :u~d co~npreh~nsive planning, and enhancecl jub gruwth and ecunomic revitalization. Decline
and dctNrioration nf Q~e area is likely tci result under the No-Pr.~jectlCuntinuing Develapm~nt Alternative.
-t is anticipatcxi that diis alternative wuuld alse~ r~.cult ir- similar adverse impacGS as th~ prupused
Proje.:t. including:
a. All uf the ~:umulativc impacGs a.csociatul with the Pruject, sueh a5 impacis rclating to the
loss uf prime agr.cultural land; land use compatibilities inher~nt in the juxtaposition of
i:uH ~cs,sr:r „•~x,~r,oW.,~a•;a -GO-
I'(:'~~3-113
commercial and residential uses; cumulative air quality impacts related to emissions ot'
120G, NUx, C0, and PM10 which will exctecl SCAQMD signiticance thresholds; solid
w~.cte impacts because of limitecl landfill c~pacity; pot~ntial implets retated to cumulutive
consumption of electricity 1nd natural gas; and construction impacts such as
transportation disnaption, noise, air emissions, and visual disruptions.
b. Traffic impacts would be equivalent to or greater than traffic c~nditions with the
proposeci Project. Tl~is would occur because develr~pment consistent wi:h the General
Plari would be anticigated to occur; but the transportation and circulation improvements,
which woLld be completed in a cc~ordinateci fashiun by the proposeci project, would occur
in a more piecemeal fashion.
c. 7'he benefits uf the cohesive and integrated landscaping and design guidelines wouid be
lust as the project area developed on more of a parcel-by-parcel basis.
d. Fewer indirect jobs would be generateil by implementation of this alternative.
e. Since construction activities a.esociatecl with alternative developrnents would not be
~:oordinated by implementation of thc SpeciFic Plan and Mitigation Monitoring Plan,
significant disruptive impacts would re.eult.
[n addition, because of the incremental and inconsistent types of cSevelopment which are likely
to occur and the lack ot planning and infrastructure improvements, the No-Project/Condnuing
Devetopment Alternative fails to achieve the Project objectives. This will in turn produc~ a loss
of competitiveness with other tourist/conv~ntion destinations, and result in further decline and
deterioration uf the area:
a. The Nu-?roject/Continuing Developm~nt Alternative wauld result in parcel-by-parcel
approach to development within the Specific Plan area. Parcel-by -parccl development
would fail to achieve the beautification and t'unctional improvements necessary to attrace
graater numb~rs of visiters .o the area and produce economic revitalization. The
compr~hensive coordination of infrastructure improvements ~~.~ proposul with
impi~mentation of the Project would not be achieved.
t,. The No-Praject/Continuing Development Alt~rnative would lead to scatterrci an~l
incremental d~velopment. As a result, benefits wuutd be dilutecl, and the Specitic Pl:~n
area would not provide integratc~t and unifiecl facilities ro the pubiic to the extent
contemplatecl hy the Project. This incrernental approach would not meet Anaheim's
Gcneral Plan ~oal of enhancing visitor-serving commercial uses in the City in order tci
pr~ivid~ a catalyst for the economic anJ physical enl~ancement of Anaheim. 'fhe City,
I:\Ul)CS'~Slic~dl~ON1MADM.A%t'/Al ~ l'
~~~_ ~~~.~~1' i l.)
the business community and the public would lose the economic stimulus that the
coordinatecl project woulci confer on d~e area, and to the re~rion through expandecl
revenues from the Specific Plan area.
c. The parcel-by-parce! development that would occttr with implement~tion of this
ulternative would lead to the loss of municipal revenues that wot-ld he realized with
development under the guida~ice of the Specitic Plan, thus detracting from the quality of
life an~ aesthetic/visual chacacter of the area.
J. The Project wauld enhance the Anaheim area by pcoviding a wider range of attraction,,
hotel accommc~dations restaur~.nts and retail shopping opportuniiies, all of which would
benetit Anaheim's rwidants and the visiting public. '~he project will facilitate
reinvestment in the area to support the uses in and around the Anal-eim Resort, enabling
the City to evolve to meet current and future market demands for a revitalizad resort-area
t~ugeted at longer visitor stays. The No-ProjectlContinuing Development Alternative
would deprive the area of these integrated benefits, This alternative would lead to an
uneven mix of uses, which would nut stimulate the economic base that the project would
create.
e. Since this alternative would result in incremental, parcel-by-p;ucel development,
environmental impac~s would not be minimized as they are for d» Projact through
comprehensive development guidelines such as the General Plan Amendinent and the
adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, and other discretionary and ministeriai
actiuns as may be necessary.
f. The incremental, par~el-by-parcel development would fail to provide a toundation for
economic stability or expansion in the future, whereas the project wnuld position
Anaheim as a worid-class recreation destination, ;inJ would provide trem~ndous direct
and in~iirect economic benefits to the area by improving anJ enhancing the tourist
industry,
Hor all of d~e above reasons, the No-Preject/Co.~tinuing U~velopment Aiternative ha.s been
det~rmined ta be infeasible.
5.2 MOnIF[ED LAND USE ALTEItNATIV~ (HO'tEL CIRCLE)
5.2.1 •crin4i9n 4f Alternativ~. The Modiiied L~nd Use Alterr-ativa assumes that the 489.7-acre
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan is implement~t as arloptecl, but that the 6.8-acre Hotel Circ:le Specitic
Plan Jocume~t is withdrawn, not approv~cl, or not approvecl as proposul; and that the 6.A acres oti
pruperty rire includeJ in th~ Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. Under this alternative, the total number uf
i:uwcs~six,.~~wx~w~nn~M.~~fa+i -62-
_;t~_ ('C9~1-113
acres within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would increase to z total of 556.3. Alternative uses woulcl
be desi~nated on the properties includeci withia the portions of the Hotel Circle Specitic Plan boundaries
where uses desi~natecl in the Hotel Circle Specific Plan are currently praposed. ~Jndar this alternative,
the Anaheim Resort Specitic Pian would perrnit 1,1U3 hotel units within the Fiotel Circle Sp~cific Plan
area, which is the same hotel room density proposul under the Hotel Circle Specific Plan.
5.2.2 Findinyg. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including
considerations for the pr.ovision o4' amployment opportunities for high:y trainecf workers, mai:e infeasible
th~ Modititxl Land Use Alternative (Hotel Circit) identifiecl in the EiR.
5.2.3 Factti in Suytmrt uf ~indinr~. As discussed in S~ction 5.3.1.1 of the EIR, the potential impacts
associated with I:tnd use plans and policies; transpnrtatien and circulation; employment, pop~~'ation and
housing; public services and utilities; geology, soils and seismicity; groundwater. and surface hydrology
would be co-nparable to the proposed project, impacts to land use compatibility, visual resources and
aesthetics, noise und air qua~ity would Se generally greater under this ~Iternative than under the proposed
Project.
Implementation of this alternative woulti not recluce or eliminate any ot'the signiticlnt adverse
impacts associatecl with the proposecl Project. The Modifiad Land Use Alternative would result in tha
fullowing aclverse impacts, similar to the proposecl Project:
a. All of the significant .umulative impacts associatal with the Project, such as impacts
relating to the loss of pcime agricultural land, land ust incompatibilities inherent in the
juxtapusition of commercial and residential uses, cumulative air quality impacts relatecl
tr~ emissions ~~f RbG, NOx, CO and YM1U which will exceed SCAQMll signiticance
thresholds, construction impacts such as transportation disruption, noise, air emissions,
~~isual disruptions, solid waste impacts due to limited l~ndtill capacity, and potential
impacts related to cumulative consumptior~ of electricity and natural gas, would continue
to be signiticant cumulative impacts.
b. All project-related impacts that are unavoidable and cann~t be mitigatui to a less than
significant level, including land use r~latal plans and policie;s; land use compatibility;
trat'tic; air quality; schools; solid wa~ie; visual resources/aesthetics; and construction
impac~s would also be anticipated with this alternative,
Although the Modifiecl LanJ Use Alternative would achieve the Project objectives. ~t woul~l not
reduce or eliminate the significant envi~onmental impacu of the project, and in some instances, would
produce greater impacGS than the Project. For these reasons, this alternative is reject~i as infeasible.
I:~Ixic'S!SL'[~+IWxosMDM.A7.c'/~tl -63'
-80- PC9d-11J
5.3 DISNEYI.AIV~ RTSORT LAND USE ALTERNATIVF.S
5.3.1 ,U~~cri~tion o!' Altcrnativ~. Section 5.0 of 7'he Disneyland Resart E1R, Alternativ~.c to the
Project, evalutttes three alternative land use scenarios for the S6-acre agricultural parcel within the
southeast portion of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. This parcel was removrcl frum inclusion within
the boundaries of The nisneyland Resort Specific Plan prior to final adoptiou of that specitic hlan in
June, 1993. As such, this parcel ~vas subsequently inclutlecl within the proposed boundaries of tha
Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan. The land use 1lternatives analyzed for this parcel in the EIR for the
Disneyland Resort include: (a) the Land Use Alternative; (b) the Recluced Scale Alt~rnative; and, (c) the
Incceased Praject Scale Alternative, The analysis of these alternatives is summarized in and incorporatul
by reference into Section SA c~f the An,theim Resort Specitic Plan E[R. T'wo of ;hese alternatives, the
Land Use Alternative (proposing use of the site for a regional shopping mall) and the Reduced Scale
Alternative (proposing use of the site for multi-level parking), do not satisfy the ob,jectives of the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Project and, therefore, were eliminated from further consideration for the
reasons detaileci in Section S.1 of the E[R. The Increaseci Project Scale Aiteroative was retainecl for
further consideration and is analyzed in d~e Anaheim Resor~t Specific Plan EIR.
The Increasecl Project Scale Alternative features a I;urger third theme pa:~c in the Futt~re
Expansion District ttian the previously proposed third theme park analyzed as part oF The Disneyland
Resort Project. 'I'his alternative analyzes davelopment of a d~em~ park on all L~1 acres of the Future
Expansion District (including the 56-acre agricultural parcel); potential impacts oF this alternative would
be similar in nature to those analyz~d as part of The Disneyland Re,cort Proj~ct, as previously pr~~pqseci
(refer to Section S.7 of The Disneyland Resort EIR, June 1993), However. impacts associated with
transportation and circulation, air yuality, public servic~.s and utilities, visual resource,e and aesthetics,
noise, land use compatibility, and energy are anticipated to be greater dian those associated widi the
proposed Project. Under the provisions of the proposed Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan, a theme park use
wuuld be allowed by Cundition~l Use Permit.
5.3.2 Fi 'n •. Specitic economic, legai, social, technological, or other considtrations, in~luding
considerations for the provision of employment opportunities fur highly trained workers, makt infeasihle
the Disneyland Resort I_and Use Alternative,~~ identified in the EIR.
5,;3.3 'kg!`ts in Supgq~ of ~indlnes. Two of the Disneylancl Resoi~t Land LJse Alternativas, namely
the Land Use A,Iternative (proposing use of the site for a region~l shopping malt) and the Reduced Scale
Alternative (proposing use of the site for multi-level parking), do not satisfy the objPctives of the
Anaheim Resort Specitic Pl~tn Projcct and, therefore, were eliminated from further consideration for die
reasons detailed in Section 5.1 of the ElR.
T'he Increased Project Scale Alternative would result in the following adverse impacts beyond
the impacts of d~e Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan:
i:uw~s~sr.c~a~waon~nuht.nzciai -(4-
-~1- PC9~l-1 13
a. There woulcl be increaced significant impacts to residents adjacent to tha 56-acre
agriculturll parcel due to the increase~l mass and bulk of parking facilities needed to
accommodate visitors to the area, due co development ~f the 56-acre lgricultural field
into thert~e park uses.
f~. In comparison to ThP Disneyland Resort Specit"ic Plan project analyzed in the Draft EIR,
the addition of a largP thome purk would generate higher p.m. peak hour trips, thereby
increasing vehicle emissions.
c, ~`onstr.uction impacts would be of higher intensity and longer in ~lucation at a given
location than for the proposed project since the type and scale of developc-~ent is
increasui for the presently proposed hotel/motel and acces~ory uses ~lesignated for the
56-acre parcel.
d, A!! of the nnavoidably signiticant impacw assaciated with the Project would still occur
with this alternative, including impacts relating to the loss uf prima agricultural land;
land use compatibilities inharent in the juxtaposition of commercial and residential uses,
air quality impacts relatecl tu emission.s of R~G, NOx, CO and PM10 which will exceed
SCAQMD significance thri:sholds, solid waste impacts because uf limited landfill
capacity, and construction impacts such as transportation disruption, noise, air emissicns
and visual disruptions,
Although the Incre~sed Project Scale Alternative would achieve the Project objectives, it would
not recluce or eliminate the signi~cant environmental impacts of the Project and in some cases may
produce greater impacts than th~ Project. Por these reasons, this alternative is rejected as infaasible.
5,4 GOWER INTENSITY LAND L1SG ALTERNATIVE A: YEAR 2000
5,4.1 D~4..r1pi~4~1~ ~~terni~tiee. 'fhis alternative assum:s that the Project iimits development to
implementation of the first stage of the An~l~eim Resc~ct Specific Plur. development (year 2000). Total
buildout of the Specific Plan under this alterr~ative would result in a total of approximately 17., l90 hotel
rooms by year 2000 (11,190 existing plus approximately 1,000 aclditional hotel rooms).
5,4.2 ~!!!4&. Specific economic, legal, social, technologicai, or od~er considerations, including
considtrations for the provision of employmenk oppoRUnities for highly trained workers, make infeasible
the Lower Intensity l.and Use Alternative /#: Year 2000 identified in the E[R.
5.4.3 F~ts in Suuuurt uP FincD%~;,y. As discussed in Section 5.4 of ihe E[R, although this alternative
wouid result in reduced short- and long-term environmental impacts, it would fail to achieve the City's
long-term community and ecunom~c objectives to e.ctablish an overall identity and iand use plan which
i,~oa:s+sec~ni~oxuannorn.nzc~~i -65-
_8~_ PC9A-113
is inten~leci to maximizP :h~ area's potential while gu~ding future clevelc~pment and ensuring a baiance
between growth and inFraetn~cture.
"Che folluwiag P:oject objectives wuuld not be achieveci with implementation of this aiternative:
a. Tu foster the growth of the City's economic ~x-tential b~~ revitalizing the Anaheim Resart.
b. Maintain and encourage Anaheim's position as a nationalty r~~cognizeci tourist,
convention, and recreation center,
c. lncrease sates t~c yielJs and further enhance the emnomic base of ~h^ community,
thereby lessen3ng the tax bunlen on real property.
d. 7'o create a coherent, unique re!wrt iJentity that reinfnrc~ the image nf the Anaheim
Res~~rt as a high-quality destinatiun resort.
e. Te~ proviJe fur necessary public infrastrt:cture ai~d serv~..ca te- maximize the Jevelopment
~mtential of tlie Anaheim Re.~ort.
f. Tu establish a high•yuality pocleatrian envirnnment.
g. To improve the aesthetic chara~cter of the ,'lnaheim R~.KOrt by visually d~~iining the
buundari~ with appropriate lanclsc~pe treatmenig.
For th~e reasuns. this alternative i~ rejectal ac infea~ible.
S.S LOW~R INTEtYSITY LAYD U5~ ALTERNATIVE p: YFAR 1pOS
5,5.1 Ucse~i~ion of Altern~.Lizt. "Ihe Lower Intensi~y LanJ Uxe Ai~ernative N: 20(18 xc..~nario
incarpirata- the axsumptioas describod in thP Fi~cal Analysia Techn~c.~i Re~irt prepareJ fc~r the Ciry c~f
Anah¢im by CI'5 In Aprl 1~93. The ~wmptinn w~s -nade that hy 2008, therc will t+e a ~~-tal Jemand
fiir appruximat~ly IG.200 hatel raim~ or a ne1 increa~e ut a{~{~r~xim~tclv f,004 hutel ryw~m~ in the
Anaheim Resnrt ~~ific Plan area. Imp;er,ientaticrn c~f thic alirtnative wYiuld rexult in aM~n,ximately cme•
third fewe .~~~tel rcx-mz by the year 2008 than tht muimum ~ar-~~.er cif tn-iel ax~ms (2~,SAA) hy the yeat
2010 that wn~uld Ix~ permiua! wiU~ thc pn-~-c~zecl !'nrjcrt.
5.5.2 ~~. SpccErc cxx-rK-mic. Icgal. Krciai. technuk-~ical. c-r cnhcr cx-nxidcro~ian.+~. inclu4ing
~:mai~e~a~icir-~ f~~r U~e prc~vi~'s~n ~if cr. ~ri~~yrnent ~~-~+muni~iac for higi~ly Irair.:rl warken~, maice ir.fc~-ihlc
thc la~w~r )ntcnxity LanEf Uxe Al~ernative B: Yur 2MA identiRat in the ~lR.
1 7Mw"~lf~•.10 ~I[~MA(P11 AJl...I7 .(~lr
. M ,ti .
~'L.~~'~. ~ ~ t
S.S.3 ~ycL in S~nuort o[~ndlpa,s. As discussed in ~~ctiun 5.5.2 af the EJR, the pcitential imnucts
associatai with land use-relatexl plans and policies; land use compatibility; ga~logy, soi~s, ;tnd seismicEty;
groundwater and surfacc hydroiogy; hazardous materials; visual resourcrs and a~sthetics; anJ r,ultural
resources would be comparable tu the pro~nised proJect. Impacts to transpunation and circulation; air
yu~lity; noise, employment. population anJ housing; public services and utilities; and energy would be
anticipatal to be recluced in comparison to the pi~posai Project, but no unavoidiible signiticant impacts
of the Pmlect would be avoidecl.
Thc Lower-lntensity Land Use Alternative B: Ye~1r 2008 was selectecl a~ the mcst
environmcntaily superior of the alternatives analyaed. Now~ver, this alternative is nut capable of
eliminating any significant aclverse effecG~, nor will it re~tuce to a level of insignifican~:e of any of the
unavoidable signiticant impacts of the Pro.iect. The fewer numher of hotel rcwms that would be permittacl
with aduption of this alternative wouid gencratc fess of x tax 6ase and associated revenues from which
to fun~ public services and utilitie.4 and ott~er public infrsstructure improvemen~a to the Anaheim Re.aort.
This aiternative wo~dJ not proviJe the puhlic bene~t aasociatal with the intent of the economic objective,~.
such as to "incr~ing sales tax yields anJ fiirther enhancing the ec~snomic haae of the community, thereby
lessening thc t1x burden un rcal property." "i'his alternative would result in the geaeration of fewer jobs
within the Anahcim Peaart due to the fewer number uf hotel/motr.l ra~mc that woulJ be ~~Itimately
developal. Implementation uf this alternative would impecle many nf the community and econumic
objectiv~ u stateJ in the Drsft EIR S~~ction 2.2, Project Ubjectiv~, and ~~ summarizeif abuve in Seaion
5.4.3, Farts in Sup~x~rt of FinJings. a- g.
r ~rx~.KY•..~r~rr.Mtn~~t~-n '6~'
.t1- i'C".~i-11:~
SLCTION G
FIhDINGS REGARDING (7fNCR CE(~A ~:ONSIDERAT(ONS
6. I RELA'T70NSNtP Ci~TWEEN I.OCAL ~FIURT-TERM USFS OF THE ENVIRUNMENT AND
THE MAINTENANCE ANL~ ENHANCEMI3N'C ~F LONG=TERM PRODU:,TIVITY
The Anahzim Resart Specitic Plan area is curr~ntly Jesignated fur (;ommercial Recreation uses
by the City of Anaheim Ganeral Plan Land Use El~ment, anJ is developecl wich thrce primary existing
land ust:s: hotel/motel, restai-rant, anJ thr An:-lieim Cunvention C~nt~~, As a r~sult, the Projec:t azea
has already been JedicateJ to urban-~iriented recreati~mal anJ canvention c~nter us~,~. Tli~ proposed
Project ~vould facititate thu expansionlintensitication of r.~,;ti~ land uses within th~ project area.
Implementation of th~ Project woulJ implement a lung-term strategy for enhancing the developrnent
potential ~~f the Anaheim Rc~sort Speciti~ Flan ar~a.
The Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan anJ the recently adupted CisneylanJ Resort Specif+c Plan have
been coordinatul hy the Ciry to achieve the City's g~ials uf continuing dzvelopment and e~~han~ement of
comention, tl~eme park, hoteS'tnotel, and visitur-serving uses in the Anaheim Rcsort. 'I'his will be
achievul thcough standard~ for design, IanJs~aping, and signag~, and througti cuordination and
implementatiun of infrastructure impruvements. The cuorJination anJ implementation of these two
specific plans is consider~xf tc~ b~ hoth ~omplement.iry and mutually beneticial. :.,+plemeniatian of the
Anaheim ke.gurt Specitic Pl~n represents z step tuward achieving the goal, of the Ciry of Anaheim, which
include cc~mp~ehensiveiy planning for the area's umtinuing grc~wth and Je~~elopment and eswblishing the
area as a world-class destinati~m-oriente.~l res~-rt. The implementatinn of the Anaheim Resort SpsciCc
f'lan would eontinue ro enhance the area as an arhanized envinmmerrt ir~orporating u~rnmerciai.
entertainment, and recreatinn uses.
'i?~e p~opc~seel Project is expected t~- indirectly pr~~vide suhstantial long-term benefita to the
community and th~ ~uhlic. It will enahle th~ r~vitalization anJ enhancenocnt uf the long-eerm ecnnn nic
prcxfuctivity of thc area by indu~ing j~ihs and suh~tantial tax revenues. AJJitiunally, the Project will
prcn~ide major infractructure imrmvements, in~luding ne~re~ary imprrrvements tc: the City of Anaheim's
transportalion and circulaticin syst~tn.~ anJ t~- tlv: C,'ity's ruhlic s~rvices and utifity syxtems.
Imptementaiinn of th~ Praject may r~~ult in cnm~erting 5G existin~ acres ~yf land in agriculwt~l
~r«fucticm to urban devetapment, therehy r~lu~inL the prime farmland in strawberry pr~xluction in the
atata by Isss than 0.2 percent. 'Thc ticld is ~urr~~unJeJ hy devrl~~pment, anJ thc City c~f Anaheim Gencral
Plan hd~ d~.~ignaleJ the fannlanil t~~r Grmr,i~;cial lt~r~at;,,n u~e. 'llie f'raject ma;, therefi~re, be
u~nsidcral ar. enhan~cm~nt to long•t~rm rr~~Ju.trvity in a.rm. ul' Iar~J ucc efticiency. +~incc it wiN increase
thc xit~ s ecunomic rrudu~tivicy in ~ccurJancr with ~he Ci~y's (irner;~l F'lrn.
i rxx'n ux'~i'w~.~~ow ~~a•,.i •4R•
_,,,, _ I'CSl,t -1 13
6.'l SIGNIFICANT (RREVGRSIRLG ENVIRONMENTAL CMANGES
The Anaheim Resorc Sprcitic Pla~i wuuld in~lireccly reyuire the long-term commitment of natura!
resourccs and lanci. 'i'he signiticant, irreversible envirunmental change is thr commitment of 56 acres
of existing prim~ a6ricultural land to urhan devc:lupment. It shuulJ be noted, however, that ttiis land is
designated fur urLan Jev~lapment in the Ciry uf Anatieim General Plan, su its remuval is cunsistent with
lucal c:ommunity planning.
implementation of the Project would .~Iso indirecdy result in increaseci cunsumption of
nonren4wable anJ sluwly renewable rc;s~zurcc:s such as fuel uil, natural gas, gasoline, lumber, sand aod
gravel, asphalt, petrochemical ~onstruction materials, ~teel, cupp~r, lead, and water, etc. 'I'he Project
is consistent wid~ reKiunal gro~~vth prajectiuns, h~,wever, anJ mitigation measures h;rve be~n incorporatecf
in the Project ro reJuce i~s cunsumptiun uf water and enerdy sources.
6.3 GROW1'FI-INDUC{NC IM~'ACI'S OF THE PROPUSBD PRO1G!'f
lt is anticipated that the Anahe~m Resort Specitic Pl;tn area will experience suhstantial eco~omie
growth in the future as an inJirect r~~sult uf th~ proposul Pn~ject anJ other municipal plannin~t eft'orts,
such ag fuwre Convention C~nter hetterment prugr;uns and Th~ Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. 1~
adoptecl, the Anaheim Reson Specitic Plan w~iuld alluw ~ummerci.~l gruwth ~:onsistent with the plan to
revitalize the area, enhance the ecunumic has~ uf the City, and in~re.~.tie local employment opportunities.
'[?ie growth that m~y be expe~teJ tu c~ccur in the tiiruseeahle future (thro~gh year 2010) in the
area surrounding the pmposeJ Projec; ar~a is d~s~ribc~l ;mJ analyzecl in Section 4A, Cumulative lmpacts,
o~ U~e EIR. Growth anticipated within th~ Anahcim Res~tirt Speciti~ Plan area wuulJ be consistent with
the types of IanJ uses allowecl in the Anali~im Rexurt, as Jescrihed in Sectie~n 4.0, Cumulative Impacts.
Therefore, although thc prapo;eJ Anah~:im Res~-rt Specitic Plan is ami~ipated to inJuce the future
Jevelopment of hotels and other cummer. i: l uses, the growth w~~uld h~ c~msistent with the growth
projectians for thc Anaheim Resurt and ~h4 rcgiun.
As discussed in Section 3.8 of the EfR. Empl:~yment, f'~~~~datiun and Houcing, considering both
in-migrating and intrar~gionai relocatiun, it is cstimatc.! that a maximum uf 2,469 empluyees wili seek
housirsg in Anaheim a.ti a rk~alt af empluyment in the Anaheim Res~irt Specitic Plan. At an average uf
3.l peMnns per hnusehuld, this wuulu tr~nxlatr. tu arprnximasely 7,4G8 new resiJent< G~r the City. In
adJitiun to th~ potential inJu~~~l gruwth dis~uss~l aM~ve. it ix cun~eivablc that ccrtain a.~p~cts of the
propc~s~xf Sp~wilic f'lars woulJ reir~uv~ h~rricr~ t~~ g:~~wth uf new us~:s ur cxpansion c-f ~xisting usea in ~he
surrounJinb ~irea. For examplc, im~~lem~ht~tiun ut the Pmj«t w•ill pravide fi~r ~ert~iD ~ublic
infrastru~ture impruve~nentc that may pru~•idt :ar:+city in rx«.~s cit th~ .urr~nt d~rnanJ.
r vrxxurr'.ro.w~uuu ~yr~n •G9-
- tic,-
PC').1-1 i 3
~ • As noted in d» EIR, th~ signiticant environmental impacts of the inJucul growth ars cunsidered
in the analysis of cumulative effects to whicli the Proj~ct will contribute. 1'he City has fqund that the
following signifcant cumulative effects will occur and diat all feasible mitigation measures have been
requir~cl in or incorporated into the Project to rr~iuce the Yroject'~ contribution :~ the significant
curnulative effects:
~ I.;tnd use-relatecl plans and policies (loss of prime aKricultural land)
• Land use compatibility (juxr~position ~~f commercial anJ resid~ntial uses)
• Transportation an~ circulatiun (deterioratui lev~ls of service).
m ;t~r yuality (cumulative air quality impacts relateci to emissions of ROG, NOx, C0, and
PMtO which will exceed SCAQMn signiticance thresholds; significant cumulative SOx
emissions mny also occur, but are required ro be offset)
• Ploise (traffic, constnictiun noisa)
• Solid waste (impacts Jue ti~ limited landtill rapaciry}
~ Schcwls (possible facilities neeels eaceeding faciliti~:s fee rev~nues).
• Visual impacts (r... , ~~ to cur.structic-n)
~.
« Constniction impacts (such as transportation disruptian, air emissians, and visual '
disruptions) '
In adJition, the EIR ha:; iJentitied mitigation me:-sur~s which ~ould bc imp~~sed on the relatecl
projectt which have not yet beer~ ti~pprovzcl, anJ/or un a city-wid~ basis, to turther reduce tn~ cumulativs
impac~s.
I.:Ikk:X'SF11~Iq/1MADM A71'~41 -'~(~•
_.y-_
~~~.~•1-~ ~ ~1
SECTION 7
5I'ATEMENT QF OVCRRLDlNG CONSIDERAT[ONS
As describec! above in these findings, the City of Anaheim has determined chac even with the
Pruject's adherence to existing City policies and standards and adoption of ~-il feasible mitigation
measur~.ti, certain impacts of the Project will conti~we to be, or will potentially be, significant. '1'hese
unavoidably signiticant impac~ are discussed in detail ~n Section 4.0 above in this document. As dir~cted
by Section LSOI3 uf the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Anaheim t-as weighe~l thes~e significant
unavoidable adverse impacts against the bene~its of the Project and finds that the benetits of the Project,
summarizexi below, render the significant unavoidable enviroru~ental impacts acceptable, and that d~e
Project should be approvecl despite these impaets.
Accordingly, ~he City ~f Anaheim adopts the fnllowing Statemcnt of Overriding Considerations
based on information in :he Final EIR and on other information in~ the record. The City recognizes that
significant and unavoidabte impacts will tesult from i:nplements~tion of the Froject. Havin~: (1) aciopted
all feasible mitigation measures, (2) rejected as infeasible t~~~ alternatives to the Project discuss~ci above,
(3) recognizaf all significant, unavoidable impacts, and (4) balancecf che benefits of the Project against
the Pro,ject's significant ~nd unavuidable effr,cts, the City of Anaheim hereby tinds th~t the benefits
ou-weigh and override the s8gnificant unavoiJable effects for d~e reeasso~~s statecl below.
'I'he reasons discussecl beluw summarize the benetits, goals, and objec:ives of the proposeci
Project, and providc, in aclditinn to the abuve findings, the detailed rational~ for the E~roject. 'Chese
oyerriding cnnsiderations of economic, social, ae,sthetic, and environmentai benefiG4 for the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan outweigh its enviionmental costs and justify adopiion uf the Project and certification
of the complet4d EIR. E~ch of the~e overriding cunsi~eratiuns individually wouid be sufticient to
outweigh the unavuidably significant impact~ of the Project.
in evaluating wch of the averriding co~~giderations and com~aring them to the unavoidably
signiticant impadts, tha City has ~~nsiderecl all of the information contained in the EIR, r%commendations
of the Anaheim City Pianning Commission, public comments, and other document~, ce,stimony ~nd
procecxlings in cennection with this matter. ln some c~ses, commentators on the E[R and the Pmjec!
have suggesteci that anvironmentai impacts of the Project may be gre,~ter in some respect~ than those
identif:eci in the E[R. Except as acknowledged in the City's rest~onses ro the commcnts and in d~ese
finrlings, the City does not agree with d~ese su~estions. The City hereby finds and Jetermines, hnwever,
that even if all of the s~gg~sted impac;s wera assumed tu occur, those impaccs woulcf still be outweighecl
by anJ founcl Tcceptabl~ in light of the overriJing consiJerations set forth below.
Finally, it sh.~uld bc noted that thc impacts associated with aci4ption and implementation of the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan have: heen overstateci in the EIR, which hac consideral the impacu of ~j
futur~ development unJcr the. Spocific Plan, radier than merely th~ incrcmcn~.al development abuve and
i.~~x~s-s~u~aionMnM ~vr;.i -71-
••!:`i-
{'(;~l.l -1 l 3
beyond that which wuuld be pennittecJ under existing land use designations (generaily up to 7S
hotel/motel rooms per parcel without a conditiona! use permit). None of the City's findings and analyse,s,
huwever, relies on this faCt. Tha City has takeu the very conservative approach oi considering the
impacts of all future devefopment within ehe Specific Plan ;uea to be impacts associated with this Project.
The assumption of :ull Project buildout (16,OW to 17,000 additional hotel/rnotel roorns over existing
conditions) by the year 2010 is also very conservative (see, e.g. ,~p,aheim Gommercia Rec~eation Area
Fisc~tl A~aivsis (EPS 1993), which projected approximately 5,000 additional hotel rooms by the yea-•
2008),
7.l ~NCR~ASED REVFNUES FOR CITY, COLJPITY, A1VD SCATE
The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will produce substantial beneficial ~scal impacts. 'i'he Pcoject
will direcdy generar,e signific;snt revenues in property taxes, sales taxes, hntel taxes, utiiity taxes, ~nd
miscellaneous taxes and fees to tha City of Anaheim, County of Orange, and State of California.
Evidence of the substantial fiscal benefits of the ~roject has been ducumental by the Ciry (see,
e.g. EPS 1993). Tl~is evidence confirms that lhe economic benefits of the Praject will include substlntial
net increases in muuicipal revenues from the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan azea. T'he net funds accn~ing
to the City will be available tn pay for enhanced services and infrastructuce facilities throughout t~e City.
Additionally. the Pr~~jP.ct creates economic Senefit~ &om induced economic activity in the City and the
sunounding region; however, these multiplier effects are somewhat apeculative, and have not bcen
calculatal in the fiscal analysis.
7.2 ENHANCFMEMT Ok TOURISM
The Anaheim ResoR 5pecific Pian will improve and enhance the Southern California tourist
industry, an in~ustry of immence imponance at the local, regional, a.~d state levels. 'The Anaheim Area
Visitor and Convention Bureau (VCB), which uacks the c:ounty's tourists, estimateel that 40 million
pdople visited the Convention Center, d~e area's theme parks, ar~d beaches in 1993. The Dureau
extima~eci that the visitors spent ~4.R billion in Urange Couoty in 1993 (VCH, June 1994). The Orang~
~'ounty region and the City of Anaheim benefit greatly from these rev~nues frAm tourism. ln 1992, the
Gov~rnor's Counci! un California Competitiveness publishec! "California's Jot+s and Future." The report
identitia! the tourism industry ax a kcy industry in the Stat~ of Califo~nia and ursal "extraordinary
effons" be made to preserve and enhance the. competitiveness of such key industries.
The Anaheim Rasort (previausly namoct Conunerci~I Recre~ation Area) has been an important arid
vit.~l source of revenue, jobs, anci prestige for the City uf An~luim, with thc Anai~eim itesort Spc~cific
Plan area providing x major purtion of the conventiun facilities and lodging for the tourists in th~ area.
Hnwever, to maint:.in its vital rolc: in the economy, it is nc~cessary to reinv~.ct in the area to sup~~~rt the
usas in anJ around the Anaheim Resort enabling it te evolve to mer.t current market demancis for a newer,
i:~a~cs~s~.~w~onM~M..tiu~~i -72-
-g`.1-
pC9d-ll'a
~ ' upgraded r~sort area g~ared tc,wanl lunger visi!ur ~tays. This r~investrnent and revitalization is a~so
necessary to alluw the An,~heim Convention Centec tu retain its st~itus as on~ of the major West Goast
com•ention facilities. Without the infrastructure facilities, landscaping/identity enhancemenGS and
devefopment opportunitie:s created by the Project, tha area and its tax, convention ansl tourism base will
decline.
7.3 PROVIS[ON OE VISUAL AMBN[T1ES
The Anaheim Resort currently presents a visu~jlly conhising identity due to an abundance of large
signs, varying architectural quality, the presence of overhead utilities, and the lack of consistent
landsca~ing. 'fhe Design Flari within the Anah~im Resort ~pecitic Plan provides landscape stanclards for
th~ setback ar~as and along public streets that pass thruugh thc: center of die Specitic Plan area in order
to reinforce the ar~a's identity. The primary concept of the Design Plan is to transform the visuaf
character of the Anaheim Resort with landscape. The primary component will be streetscape, which will
inclu~le trees and shrubs, as well tu man-ma~e amenities such as light tixtures, benches, entry gateways,
and appropriate signage. Sh•eets and their edges pruvide the primary space in which landscape can be
placecl to transform the identity of the Anaheim Itesort. The Dasign Plan will be a major factor
contributing toward the visual unitication ot' the area,
7.4 PROVCSION FUR hfEEDFD INf~RA3TRllCTURE IMPROVEMENI'S
The Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan makes provision for needed infra.structure improv~ments.
Much of thc area's current infrastructur~ (roa~ls, sewer iine~, storm drains, etc.) is old and very near,
if not over: capacity. The plannaJ area im~rovements pruvided under the Anaheim Resort Specific PITn
are ~~rop~~sr::l to includ~: transportation, storm drain, wastewater, and wat~r system upgrades. 'I'hese
i,~i~,:ov~merts arr; plannecl to be coordinare~ with ~evelo~ment within the Anah:im Resurt Sprcitic Plan
;.r~a. a,S well as the approved Disneyland Resort an~l the proposed Hotel Circle 5pecitic Plan areas. The
~r_tia~tr~cture improvemer.ts w~~uld be accomplishecl thruugh a vari~ty uf tinancial mechanisms, including
mitigatiun measures, developer fees, utility hc.iok-up charges, and potentially a contribution from the net
hotel ~,ax revenues to the City. Proposcd imrrovements will be phased to coincide with area needs as
individual Qavelopments are proposed. EnhanceJ pulice, tire, and other public servic~,s wifl alsu be
Frovided in cuorJination with the pa~:e ut' develupm~nt in the area. Withuut the coordinatiun, planning
ancl implNmentation n:easur~s provide~! in cunne::tiun with th~ Pruj~ct, these improvements would not be
pruvid~J; or, at best, would be provi~l~d to a lesser extent and in a le~s coordinatecl mann~r.
7.5 ~.NHAR~£;MGNT OF CQMMF.RCIAL-RECREATidN AREA SYNERGY
'Th~ Comm~rcisl Recreation land use ~les~gnatiun w;~:: cr~ated hy th~ City of Analieim tn provide
for development relate~ tu the r~cre~tian ancl dntertainment industries that prc>vide servia:s to area visito:s
ar.d tourists. This land use designatiun is rrzsent in ~ht Anaheim R~:sur[ as we;! as the An~theim Stadiwn
1: ~D/ll'S~3[•:L~J l W~761ADM.A7/'r.11 .7 ~.
'~~~- ~~~.~)~- ~ 1 ,~
area. The ddvelopment and enhancement ut' th~ Anah~im Rcsort S~ecitic Plan ureu will in~:rease the
syn~rgy in the area from which all oF th~ area major attractiuns (An~~h~im Convention Center,
Disneyla.nd, Anuheim Stadium, Tha Arrowheacl Pon~l at Anaheim) will benetit. For example, it is
anticipated that hotei and motel d~velopment pursuant to the Projeet will accommoJate overnight guests
to all of the forc;going attractions, thereby increasing their length of stay in th~ area und re:ducing
vehicul~r travel. Without ~he additional hutel/motel develupment capacity created by the ProJect, guest~
and visitors to these attractions will be forcecl to use more distant and less convenient accommodations,
or else to forego overnight stays in favor uf more frequent day trips.
7.6 F.I~JNANCEMENT OF THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONIVIENT
An objectiv~ of the Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan n~sign Plan is to "...create a high-quality
pecit;strian environment that reinforces the urban cl~aracter of the Specitic Plan area." Anticipateci
construction of The Disn~yland Resort and improvements to the Anaheim Convention Center will create
a significant increase in ~~edestrians in the are~~. The pedestrian movement will contribute to increased
street activity fc~r shupping, ilining, lociging, and w:ilkin~ visits to the th~me parks and Anaheim
Conv~ntion C~nter. i'he Specitic Plan will enhance and accommodate the peclesr.ian environment by
providing landscaped parkways, ornamental street fe~uures and other design el~mants which will enhance
the safety and visual appeal of the pedestrian environment.
7.7 5TRGAMLINED EN'CITLEMGN'T F'120CEDURE
The Anaheim Rtsort Specitic Plan Glit will al(ow for reduced ancl/or streamtined environmenca!
review fur future development within the Speciti,: Plan urea. The ElR will serve as a"pmject" EIR with
respect to the infr,ls.ructure program and other davelopm~nt within the scope and conditions anticipated
by the EIR. For develupment p~:~jects whic:h dr, nut come within the conditions and parameters analyzecl
in the EIR, the EIR will serve ~s a Master EfR, from which aspects of the environmental anllysis for the
Project which remain relevant can be taken in order tu ra~uce the scope Of further analysis. The
preparation and certitication of the EIR will gready reduce th~ cost and time required ta process a
dcvelopmer.: p:oject within tha Spe~itic Plan area, anJ th~refore will promot~ the City's goals of j~b
gruwth and economic revitalization for tlie area.
7.8 ENHANCEMENT AND MAfN1'ENANCE nF AIYAHEIM'S POSITION AS A WORLD-
CLASS TOURIST DESTTNATION
In r~sponse ~o market pressures tu expand and upgrade the Anaheim Resort, tha City of Anaheim
has prepareci th~ An,~heim Resurt Speritic Plan tu rroviJ~ fur enhanced public improvements and
devtlupment standards. The Anah~im Rrsurt Sre~itic Plan, in wnjunctiun with the specitic plans fur'The
Disneyland Resort and Hotel Circle, will pruvide a hi,~h••quality develupm~nt scandarJ that will greatly
enhanee the viabiliry of the An;theim Resort anil maint;-in Anah~im's posiciun as ~me of the c~>untry's
~:~oucs~tec„iwior.~+un~.n'tr;~i -74-
-`.il-
Pf,~1•1-1: i
' premiere vacation Jestinatiuns. Withuut thc; Pruject, the lack ut'clev~lopment capacity ancl the lack of
coordinateci int'rastructur~ and ~ev~lupment planning will cause eha area to declin~ in visitatian and
economic viahility.
7.9 f~AC(LI'i'ATION ATYD IMPLEMEId'I'A7'ION OF THE GENGRAL PLAN
The Aaaheim Resort Specific: Plan tnables the Ciry uf Anaheim to furrher its achievem~nt of the
overall objectives established in the General Plan, as well as the guals and policies provided in each of
the General Pian elements. The fuur main ohjectives are furthereil l~y the Anaheim RPsort Specitic Plan
in the following manner:
• St,~l].~11 _Comm-mi~y Ohjective !- Mai~~tuin and enhunc~ the resrdentJal envtronment of
Anahetm's livi~rg areas.
Implen~er~tation; 'f'his objectivc; will be furthered through d~valopment of setback areas,
landscaped buffers between Specitic Plan and residential properties, and increased setb~cks from
multistory buildings.
• Gener~il ~'ommu i y.,~hj, cte ive 2- Muintnin c!nd enhnncr~ Anaheint us a regtonal, cultr~ral, and
employment center by drversifving and enl:unc.-ng the econamlc Guse c/'the communt~y.
Im~lem~iq.p; T'he Specitic Ylan was written to enham~e the Anah:im Resort as an urban
destinatio-~ acsd crea~~e a resort eovironment. By creating mor~ attractions, lodgings, dining
facilities, and shopping opportunities, jobs wiU be ::eated, and visitors will be encouragecl to
stay fur several days or more and enjoy the va-•iety ;:t the recreatiunal and entertainment
opportunitie:s that are availahle, thereby enhancing The City of An,-haim's economic base. With
buildout of th~ An~~heim Resort Specitic Plan area, ~in estimated 18,1l3 jobs will be created,
plus sui~stantial employment in th~ canstructiun sector.
• General Crrmmunity Q,~ijective 3- Muintain and encouruge Anaherm's,ovsitlon as a natinnally
recogntzed tourist, crntventinn, cind rec~reutinn center.
~ e ~ io ; Th~ An:-heim ~esort ~pecitic Plan recognizes this General Community
Obje~tive as the major purpose ut' the Anahcim Resort Specitic 1?lan, by enhancing the
attractiv~n~.ss of the area as a family-oriented toiu•ist and wnv~ntion dcstination center. The
Specific Plan encourages devalopment oriented toward tourist- and conv~ntion-related events
whil~ ,:omplementing and protecting the adjacent residential uses. The Plan provides a long•
range plan to create a cohesive and unique resurt character and to maintain an~l enhance the
existing commercial-recre~uiun land uses,
i:~ax~sttEt~~norvNnu~t..~•tcr~i -75-
M
_g?_ PC94-113
' s S-enera Communitv Obiectiv~ 4- Prnvidc ull wnrking, living, und recre~uctnn areos with a full
range of comrnunlty fucilities and ~e~rnices.
ImQlementaticm: An obj~ctive of the Anaheim Resort Specitic Plan is to improve public
infrastructure, services, and faciliti~s co accommudate ths gruwth and d~velopment that is ~
plannecl in the Specitia Plan area. Additionally, tl~e Anaheim Re~cort will be complementecl with
a"...fuil range of cummunity facilities and servic:cs" which will be upgraded and enhanced as
developm~nt of the area proceuls,
7.10 DEI'ERRENCE OF NEGATNF [MYACTS OF THE NO-PROJECT/CONTJNUING
DEVELOPMENT AI.TERNATIVE
Without adoption of the Project, com nercial properties in the Anaheim Resort would continue :
to deveiop on a parcel-by-parcel basis without an id~ntity pr~rgr~un, en~~anced design an~J development !
standards, or caordinate.~l infrastrt-cture planning. The piecemeal development that would occur, in ~
conjunction with the loss cf municipal revenues that would be realizecl with development in the area,
would significantly detract from ths attractiveness and econnmic vitality of the area, ~
Given the current economic situation, adequate public tiinds wil! not be available for capital
infrastructure improvemenes. The result of preventing improvements and reinvestment to the area may
be severe. Without reinvestment and maintenance, existing businesses may cluse and new development ~'
i
would be inhibitecl. It is reasonablN to assume that a lialt in investment and improvement would result
in a loss of attractiveness ~nd thus a decline in ~~isits tu the ar~a. This in turn results in a further decline
in the attractiveness and deterioration of the infrastructure and ec;onomic vitaiity of the area. ,
I:~DOCSISE(:11i4W1MAUM.AZ(:iJl -7~j-
_~13-
PC9~1-113
,---.
ATTACHIIAE9l9T C
~~.
M1TIGd~'I~N !lAONITC'RING PROGR~IIUI N0. ~85
-sa- r~c~a-i13
~~
~
a'E ~$
O
~ C p `
~(~ ~(n
[:
0
~~ ~ ~
a~~
0 =3
. ~
~a Q o ~
~ t0
c
a.- ~
~
d r
~ d a~i
Q
v `t U =
t0 m
N
'
~ ~v E
'
~ ~
~
~' ~
w
L
a
g v
c, a ~ y
c ~ ~ ~
o ~ W Vi
y ~
d ~ ~ c~
N
~~ az
o
~
z
,~E ~
`~;
~ Q1 y N ~
~ p'
U ~ t~
~~ 4i >
~Q
Q LL ~ ~ ~ ~
.~
0 L ~ a ~ ~,
~ ~
N
~
,~ v~i
L C.~
H
z v~ ~ ~
°
p~
LLW ~
~ N [
rn
~ c~
~ ~
Q z t ~
z ~ zR N
O
4 o E
~
' c .
~ >
~ ~ ~
U ~
O
Q ~
W ~
~
'~a rs ~r
~
:7
f=„
~
,~ .~ ~
~ Z
~
2
~
~
~ ~
'~ .-
~
T =
o ~
r ~ ~
r
p ~ ~ s
t~ r ''~
L: E .Y! ~ ~
~
i ~
~ ~~'' n
~ ~ ~
~ ~
CC ~;•C C ~~n
G Q ~
~ ~ . ~ W
s
~ u
c~ n ~ (L . .
' '~s
t
.
~ ~
~ ~ ~
2y ~ r~
.~, .
•,, .,;; r cn ~ p
~
C ~ ~f ~y y. .~' t
L
W ~7liN -6riIU
-
b^f
~~
i a C ~
~1 `~ r" c''
; ~
/ ~ ~;
::'
v
;
:
R1 C9
a .
r; -
~
3~ ~"•
~ ( i r',
~~~y~~.
1/i .,,
~ii •.~
~L. ~~
~-.
~
iv
ai
o~uo
'
~ d~° o
: :o a
•
c c
$m o
a
M~ 9~ ia ~ b
o ~
~ i
:~
g c a _
~ •
~ ~gc a
~
O ._ ~n ~o t ~ 1' B
o S t o
~ W ~
$ ~ c ~
'~ ~ o~
v ~
V D Y V
N~ 7 Q ~ C ~
9 E~ L~~
~~Y
' ;V
' t
« s
3
° FN
~o
~ s~~
^
~
„
~ ~
~. :
m
o
_> CJ ~
,
c Q~ o o~ cT n
rm
3rov 3a° ° ~°~z' ii
,
.
~uoc occ°' H
~ Ew~ 2
c o
~~ c~ o c Y, _ »
A
N~~o N C 7
~gti ~ ~
0 17'- ~j
3 ~
Q
~ O A c
Y.
y~ f
S ro ..
E~ C
C
~
~ n
" Q
'
h ~
g , ~ ~ .
~~ ~
V O N
nro'~ ~
_•wn~ •
~ q~E$ ~n
" P ^ ° ,~ 1 c • ~ n~ $ ~ °
O~ E~
o E o'o ro~ O~
~ r
- c c ~ OI C~
~~~ M•
o
E o c p
~ p' 1 M
o s•
C~~ p ~
j ~
~~ i~ ~
~
~
t?
$q3G
V wyD'E
n
+ ~ E~:~ w
:~
e ~
w
° • ~
~
o~
E ~t- ~
e c.Q j
oc NN in
,~.
c M.~ c
~>
y ` «° n~n O~
~ ~'~
C c
E i n i c
a~ E ~ ~
u e
F
p
m
s
E y o ,
~~~~v
~ Q ~
~
e
v ~
E~ u= ~
~
e S!
.
~~ ^ JI ~
L' ~ N 6 q~~ ~ ~
• a y~ V
` Mr N
R~ C
~ J N
N L
3m ~o
V A ~Q.E~
~
A $
p~~ o
F
~ 4~ ~ a~ i y°~ s E v
V
S F
'~sw ~ aN;~ S~
y
~o ~- ~oE N > :~:o~'~ ~ S
o~+~~
Y a N ;o~~
t P
~ E_~
.. ~"' N~E
A
~ c t e
Y N~ u c
V G LL p "
1! e'< <
-~ ~! ~j q~i
~ N
p
~ A s ~ Y ~~ V ~ ~ ~ V ~
t
~ °~~ &~
E ~
`"
w
o
E -~
E~
' '
^
~~
~
«x
;
n
-
~
Q
~
n~ r o
~
~$ n ~
+ ~
c•~ ca ,~~s
M E
'~ ta ~
°n~n ~ c E ~i
o
~ E
e ° c'O .~c
~,eAf
'.
E ~
~.
~
~R:3 i ~
~
- ~
N~ri R
~ +
,,~ ao ~
aE ry~
i c
(~t
~~ = V V ~ j N P s'. v~ F ~ 6
y;~`
` "~ C s L
S' E
' i'~ .% ~
~
`
z T y
:.~ r
v
a~E: ~
~ i
p`~"
~ }
L' c
a
•
~4'r„v
? ~ c
°
~
tiiPc
E~ V G t
)
V~/ ~` ~
• .+cS
,
v~H Y.~ P
~ i
~"~~ n~~~ ~ ~"~' Qg
~ c~
r
° 4 S
E h~ ~ q n ii
a
~~ o,.
~ Y!
~_
^ ~ S w
+ _. c €
• A~
-~E
'~ ! ~ t. Ta
^b ?
' ~ u 3~°,
r ~ ~
~
;
~
U{,~.. ~;
„ ~:
'~ °
;
' t:
;.
3~~
~ Y
`~
s,y L
3~~ L F D
r~ u
~ L n i
r K s y, C
~' ~'
7 i" v'l.is :i ~ .. ~ t c ^s~
~
1
~` ~ u t: ~ 1r
w f
~' ~:
M ~
S~
'~ ~ ~ V
c:.
'
.~ i
r c
_
:i ~ S«
`~ L y v[
~° l:
'i i- '+ jv .~r
rt
i ~ " c
~
r
,rx
~ ~_ ~ .. w
r. ;
~ S~ ; i ~n ~
'' r p ~ •3 `'
L £
o . !
c `::,
` ~ r
.r+
C.;~ . 3:,<s ~ ~ n~f i~
~ i i
y y`~
R W 4
L' ! 1~' ~ F.
~1 L
'' ~ K
, L r`.
: ~ ~ v s `~, 5
9
$: ~r .- y
~
!: ~ n r
Y
{J ~ r
rr y
L .
. y 3
fY
~ ~ '" ~
i
' ..
; S ~ {'IY
v' i
~ ~ y
~ ~~ .}
~ ~ ~'
~:
1~' •
~, '
r
~ *
j
~: ~ ..
~1 ~ 7 e
(~ - t~
y y s
G r
t
~
f.
F.. y
"' "
~ ,
m"~ t.
~S-LiY
fy ~
~: p*
rt ~ ~,
r
:r
~
'
.
w e ;. :
~.~
• ~ ;s ,~ :.
~:~.
-i ~Y
r_
t ~ ~
~:
VA~ ~
•. {
_ ,
W
~
~
~
~
~
.~e .
m
~
~
~
ti
5_
C
C O
Q L~1
~ ~
c c
Rf
aa
v
~ ~
:C
3 C
N ~
E '{ I
~
o c
~ y m
V v'n
,j ~L O
~ ~ u
a~ p
a V U
N K
~ ~ t
~
~ ~ T
G "~'
~ ~ ~
~ ; N
W ~ ~
~~~ C?
~n -.LS,
~ ~Kn
C ~
~
~ ~ ~
C) {:
~ ^ ~
~ ( y ~ ~
~.""_ ~~_~:!.~tw! `-~~
I'~ 1 •~ 6 1 .y
N
0
:r
c
c:
~
0
a
~) t
Gp
N
~
m
a
C
.g
d
'~
F
c~
rn
~
c
.~ v ~
c
~ o
~
C ~ Z
W ~ ~
N _ g
O y ~
{ ~ ~
V y~
C
f~
fL O 1-
~
N
d
r
E ~
Q i,y G
d •~ ~ •~ O
~ ° a`~ z'
01
aCi~~ ~ •wv ~
~ V~ ~Cy~, c ~
N 1~`9 ~ ~ 6~ ~ ~ N
~--~~~ ~c
~~~~C~~E
Uc~U~~~~~
~,~ ~~ 30
d ~, c~ a
z n a'~ '' p'° ;, E,=
O° ~~~n'.~~''-E
J ~ ~c' ~ p ~J y ~ a
O LI a~ Y Gl ('i+ L: O
~ d
~ •-
~[ w
¢ ~~'~ ~~~.~1 °~
V p,n ~ rp -ii t~~
~ ~ ~ :~ ~ ~.C H R
z~a;,-,~ ~~~
'~ q ~r ~ C ~ Gy O
~: "' ~ N fJ - X Cl
~ ~F j ~~ ,Q a• ~
~ % ~ ~ ~ ~i ~p .G rJ :1 f~
~ ~ n ~ Q ~ ro ~ ~~
~ N
~
tndY~,~n~N~ F.
Q ~~ G~ n ~ ~ ~
~~` V~} V n y p'~il l/
h~ ~~r~ °ur un ~
w !~
~ (
a ~
Rs ~~
~ ~i
:, w ~,
~ ~.
L ,~
n I r
I~ I ~~
•Z
c
~ T~
~~ ~
x
~ t~~ ~.
~~~
:~ 4
ii a'
n ~ t~.
~ ~ ~;
ri. :i ci~
N ~
U
L C C ~ 'n
C ~'G
3 0 ~ N E a c
G) '
aCi.~? o~ > ai~
a~~ a~ Q~ N~
Q ~ ~J ~ p~ ~ >O N C
j ~ ai ?i =j dr n rj n
is3~~~~Erar
~ ~
O u ~ ~ ~~_~ c`~.
av~ c o~d E ~
o L~ ~ G~ x.~ ~.
~
~~nCa~-1-Q`~
.~.~ O C
j'~ ~3 f~~" '~~ ~ ~'V ~. y .Q
L y
a v ~° :~ ~ ~ c~~i
~o•~;n~~jUou>~
D
f' .. ~Se
%'~ O ~'~ G1 ~ r7 D~~ ~
U i~,=~ M1' ~~~~•j~
E ~~~? 'c ~ w
~J N r v ~ ~ J~
~~' G D ~ y ti N O
~ ~ O ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ '~ C
~
~~c~~~$V`~~
c> ~ 3 ~. 3 si ~ ' ~ '~'
~ v ~.E E.~ v ~riU
r.'
w °~ ~
c a~ io ~ w
s O N >• O~ y~ t9 C
~ V t O~ L~`~~ C
O~'y ~ O~ T C y c O
~~ 3 u t~~~ E~'c
O~ v 2 U~ N~ ~ p
p~~ ,~C~c v~E
°L0 ~hoc~E~'.~'i
t o C- s. ~r. ~u -~'~ v
~ v ~ ._
vn e~ c~ ~>..z~ ro m
i~ 1 i~' t t'~ i ~ n c V~ ~ ~. y~ ac r
s; v~!~'r~ ~ t,L4' u y E
i'~~c"~~">.crE o
~ Nc `~' C~ ~ N ~ O •>
Gr O ~~ ~ ~~~.-r Q ~ ~ O '~ ~
~. Gi N C O~ ~~~ C: C
u
;-~.L oc~i~d~'C•4~C
v~~~wv~n~~rE
_~ ~M. ;, a
~ ~ Y ~ ~. ~p E ~ a
0 ~ :J ~ "; ~ d ~ ~1 w N
L ~
~ O rs d~~ ~ C.~ ~ L'Ct
fJ ~ N,~ 4~ V~ uf C~
U ~ _ ~ ' Y~.~: ~ q ^
n~r~'~.~1~Eo,~i,.~
~
~.+ `~ d V ~r v T~ ,»Le. y O
~FL- ~ U~ c1 t~'J~ Q Vy ~ 3 Q ~
'__'__ _"'~'~_'~Y___ ~•^_t_.._~.._"_____"_d:7t1
.~I(r- ~`~,!1,~', ~ ~
~
~
W
C
~;
a
n
~
~~
v
a
=: I
~w 1
c
~
d I
Ti
E
0
U
~ I o'
c
p 'U
7 C
~
O
C C
.
~ Y~
`° ~E
~
aci o ~ ~ a .
c o (,j
'
o E S~ N
~Un~~ ~ ~ ~ a~
W~.4~
~ ~'~° ~
'c g
O p, c ~ ~~
o ~'c~roc
O
O
• SEv~'s•
C v 4~
~6
~~~
a C
C U
Z
;
z V
E
:
~
~~,:
:
ciowf-c~ I ~
~~
aocn¢
~
va •a~.c~, ~ _ a ,~~ ~?
o ` c
i .j '"~ C c ;•_ ~ ~ Gi ~ t r ~ ' ~ ~ '3 0 ~ ~ p .- c`~7 i
a N o a~ o•° a~ ~'_° ~~~ '~ a~ c~ a=•€ aa S' °v
O N O 47 01 Q d '. C A 1 C G :7 I
b~ o ii a r ~ E E y~ o.~ ~ z°, 'O V~° c ~. d'•"~ -- ~" ~' c~~ I
-~ ~ ~, ~ o 0
~~:?~'~y~~a `~~ic~i'" ~c~~`R-'S~'~.i E~ c~.n ..~Ua
a~ ~ ~ ~4 n ~ _ ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~, ~ c~ d .~ ~ '~ E ~ ~ V ~
~ ~y a O N~.~. ~ IJ d\ w fJ N M N T 1 ~ 3 U 7~~(4 ~ C~ .
}~ O 4~ ~ a3 d Lv~i N~ vi y 4~ t~ p;t .~1 N~ p Q1 F- ~ r d O d~ p N p
ar'ar~o'`~ ~~~~+Eo ~uC~E~dE z~~y.~a~~ >.~~
`~c~°°'~~°'C~N '~F ,o~'~ ~~' ~~no~`~~ $~.ca~,
~~ ~ g ~ r~ ~ 3 o rT a' i c c m~ ~ ~ o'~ c'~ ~, ~ ~' v~ v
~,-N c~~.o m~ ~a~~ `-~~ ~, n: vnL ~,~ro
E o ~ • ~ nc 4' ~ ~ v, ~ ,~b
d•Q,~v,~~ °~ F'a.c ~~C~ ati~Er u.y• ~~,_• ~,
~ ~ o~ v, ~~• c'~ c' `_i E~-" ~ o o n° ~ o~ ~ ~~ c~`, ~ o ~'° '_ F ~v ~
ci ~ ~ ~ V ~ a ro •- N o w » `T ~ ~ ~ ~ e, " ~' ~. ;~ .1 a .-• ~ . 3
~ ~~~ ~~X~~r.~c ~~roaUEED~; v~i'D'n~.E°'c ~v,oa
~3 ~~~~,~vc~.v~~+`°~ E~~~~r ~~ a~'i?~K~ `~.~' ..~~L°
~a~,~~n.~~-Y~w~o ro~~oo~~~~ ~~o~~'i~ o~~~c~'
^d°o~ ~v~~va ~~~~7,cm._N ~Ec~r~> ~°'P~~
er~`x~y`'~~'•`" °~E`° ~`v°c, ,~ csa~ '~-" n~ ii tyc~rerE
,~2 E~~.1~~~~~w ~~n~ur~.Y~~N ur"u,.4~~~~'~ Po~r
~+ ~ $ G o ~',i U ~F-, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~' '~'~ Q ~ y ~' ~ ~ .~ ` ~ '~ a p '•- ~
r. N~ ~ g~~ ~, ~~..i ~._~
~n ¢;~z ~ ~ ov~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~~ c'~ ~ ~ur.,.s ~ .. a~, o ~,,~Q
~,. a+ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ° L c, $'~ a. r .3 '~ .~ "' `2~. ' ° ° `' :.~. ' = 5
~• ~y a ~v~ C~~,Ta ^ds: a•' c'`~ C ~' a r~.~ ~
ar~r `~~D 7~~~~1= r i;i-a o~'~ ~, '~ •'~~°.S.~ziv Q ~u~
C X U` C7 ~. ~" y ~ r Y Y'W ~.~.' ~~ Q l 7 ., ~. N C
i-cu..~, .b~, ~i ^_~.+ an..aCr.i nyU•~, ~ nj,~~
..
n c~. a~~ c ~ w E
~ .4~~o~c u ~l~i i ~uw
G .._ ...._..~ ._.__._.__. W . ~ ~ ~--
! o ~ ~d..
I ~' ~. ~~~'~~~'.
~: ° N i;:
~ ~ ~%5 ~ i'" o,~ ~
~ '^ a •z ~ r,, ~ u;
S ~ ~ n c. ~ Vi ~,~ .~
~' I ~ `/ rt: r`. ur ~ C:~ r7
.:.._w•4~.~~~ ......•..~..~....~.y ~L
~ .~ ~
~~~.~~'~ ~ ~ ~ .~
7
rc '
r.
r,
~
q.
U
.,
4
~
~
c~
C
O
~
N
a
E
0
U
c ~
V .'+-~'_~
G
•C e~
.,
'~ C~ rn
c
'd '~ c -~ (~
c
cy'C C
p ci
A
~ C C
N~
~
O
~2 G~ 01 ~
U
• ~ N cC ~
~
U
~ 6l ~9
~
V
> .
~
Z
C ~ ~
f
.Z
C~
W~ O ~ ~
.
.c
C~'
~
~ t~
-
~
w .
d ~ Lp
G
~ ~
.` '°~ • F-
y '~ F"' G~
N .oU C C-- p
.
G O Q~ vf
3E p'~
~
" O y~
~~
~ ~~~ T
~E a,
i' p W ~~
~
i"~
~L
a.
Y
;5 ~ ~~rro ~
~y
~ yY
~
`
~
n.U1-d ~ a ~
aor ~
` ~
O-OF-4 ~ ~
~
ayv~"'
17
c
o
y y
a
0 oC E ~
~
V~3
~
d N Y y
~C U~` CJ y C U ~ 6i
8.~,
c ~°~ °'cy~"'~
d
° E~y~
iU $°
'
E
` ~z d °a
ti ~~
v ~ 01~.~n °
`~ ~
~
~
~.'CVi
~ ~ ~'cod
~, ~
ro ~ ~v o~
~ ~ C O
O
~ ~ N ~ ro
Fc
a
~ d N
~
U Vi
.~ ~
~ ~ a
° ~
~( .~ c
,c o n °
u,~~
` ~ '~i
~; 1
~o..u-l,~-~o
x f= a,
a
tsu ~
F>a'~
~~~ F=$
~
' A
°'o~'~~~
~ d°°~
•
N
~ v ar
~E ~ t~ r v~ ci
r~'E`~
"~`~ ~n
r a
c
y
o
a c~
~ '=+, t; ~- ~
c~ .c
Ep i
v
•- c~7 3 d v~i p v i
a
i
`x ~O7~
N -' N'~' t~7
`~,~ C D..~ r,roj ~i -~
~ ~ E W 'C7 n C~ 'y O
c~
'~~ o ~Lrz- '~~a dz ~ E
~ E d u o
~i'~r~
'S
2 o.ra
~3
~ u
c~id~F~r'c~
~~
'c ~ c~ c ~~,~'~
~'~ `~
' n
i E
L~ r
7 ~
T
a
~ E
' :
~ ~J T N V«. i
~~ O4 tV
4
i
~ G
~ro i
G
T) ~ a~ n Q~ G1 C~
G4
~°
~ CJ G L1 :G ~~ ,
~
q
^'
~, ~ co y°F
C '1 • _ ,c~~
`~c
U
~ 'o E a..E ~
°
' ~~~~~
a, ~
"~
~
~ i: L'~.
'~`~ M c~ ~ry ~
~'
N~ c~
E ~ o~' .
C
~~ ~"~ T .
r
c
V ~
~C
U
~ ~ ~ CU 4:
S: ~y .~. v
+ GI 6' ~.~j CI _. CI D
Ua
~
~ 7
~
~ d ~ •r
t~N~~
~ ~
O ~ ~
tp O ~~ ro 4i i
~i •
~ ~
« (~1 .
•~ Gi
N
,
Q C~ ~ ~ in y~ ~
tE «.~ v1 .'~ij '
v~ ~
~
~ t
t7
N
t r/ ~ v1
`
'
~ G O:( y VJ
O ar•i ~1 `~ u, fi
[ r C U C~
cs~
o~
-ZS
~
z
-- ru _ ~cn~r.~
wc~ .,
=-
L
~
~
W
.~
AU'? O O
J
~l ~ ~
Z ~ ~
-
O .
f`^i :~ ~ A V .
~ "~ ~ ~ .t'
~~ ~ C
' .-
~ c• •j ~ ~~ ~ a rj g
ii .
, O ~ •7
_
O 6~
c~ u
.-
n~
~ ~
~~
--
~
r.~
Q';~ J O
~I n
~~ <~ ?~
~' ~
~
(1 r r Ll . (L Ci U. f~ C~
-`.~g-
I'(,`).1- l 1 .±
u~
C
O
~
d
~
Q~
l.!
~
C
~
O C
• 'C
C_
~ ~ ~ y
'C ~ '~
O ~L ~ ~
a Y F' O
y~ ~ C •
~ ~ ~ O
U
~ 0 O h
.g y '~ ,_ N ro E y
E ~ j ~ r ~~ ~ •` ~ '` ~s
~ ~ ~, QI " .p N `~ w ~, y v ~ ~ ~ C ~ O
N
R ° ~ ~ ~n ~ '° m E ~ Q. t ~ t ~ .n ci°i. 7` ~ ~' ~' d
a o y axi~ `RS .~'~~ ~`Z-f4E o axi~~ :2~E
d a~ y o ~
o ~ ~ ~' ~~~
GD,D ~ T ~~ ~ ~~~~ G7 `; U~ fC V ~L'~ y
C in
C- ° a E`~ °~~'c,coroi'~n '~~~ ~. a.`.
E ,~? ~. 'a, o $ ,y .c: cn N ~ c a, ~ o~ o
coocv'L E pc o a~'y cn~i>cto':n~c'~..° v'va'i~ u.-3
d t` G/ d Y y, d C ~ Vf Ol ~p
EE ` w~ N c`~Ot oa~v_:~c N,~ ~~d ,Ey o
"g d i.°" o c ~ a. W ~.z' ~~~ ~ n a ~o
~a,~~ w Ey ro oE,~~ y~~~~'~~ N~~ `~~~
y ~~Oc .ro ~'~ a ~~i ro~3~~.~LO~~o ~eOw
a -~ ~
N E ~ 7 N ~ y ~.
u~i E ~ ' ~ ~ R' c vi rn a ~ ~ o u 'c c ~ vdi °~T' ' N •cGi =~ ~ ~'
y ~^~ ~ ~ N U C Z L a~Q i~ O L ~~~ N n 61 C"f' O
N CJ d C in O:_ i/~ L CP C r~~.C t' CJ
2 .~ ~ t~ 7 ~ W.Q 6 V~1 O - 6~~ Y C Npt 7 E~. 3 ~~~
~ V~ f~ ~ N b Y j a 3 ~~ L E N-'.. T y V C y~ ~
Q~. z ~ ~~ES ~~d+'E•'i~ n;E a~~~ o~ .Q~~+"'orn?
d ~' ~~ '~ ~'~3.b~ aL°i~
$, • c o•~, b E O~ ~ o> ~~ o.~ M o F- o~~ ~ o
v y~ .s' p1 y ~ o a~' E mv~ E ar5 vi E$ni °' c
~ f: b,~ C`0 O O GI ~ Q ~. C1 Q C O ~ O 7,K d U w V O
°' ~ ~ ~, ac~ u a a E~ C ~ c.~ Ecn ~
p N d~ '~ y ~ a G~ ~ 17 .~ wp .. T1 ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~¢ ~ ~~.r ~ ~ v ~j O ~ ry
C7 ~. • d~ 6> '~ t G. ~ y <!) .t 61
~~.dN CAC]o tnufr~ at o~u'" asy a~,c~,i'~ r
',~', 'w a w a~ }.~ eyi t" ~ `~' v L o° u ~?~~'" tT rN'' ~ r.+ E.4an ,Z ~, ~~
~ t6! G~i ~~ O O 7 GCI ~'v-1 ~ T~ C~ ~C .C C'J ~ O t,U. Id N d~ U ~ Q. J~ L] G~
an.~ G-on`. a~ ~,'~O w...v i 3i o iiF-O ~~ = `
n,E`~ E~o
f" ° Q ~ ~ ~t ? ~ ~ ' ~ - ~~.-.___._• ----
c~Q'
~, c
m 0~ U ,o
~ rn~V
i~ ~ p a
LL' C c Q
~~ ~ ~
y~`r~~~
_y;1_
I'C'1,1-1 l 3
`' . ~ : t+ ~, ~ ~ , ~~~ r ~i+~~~+. ~. _~
.e '!. ~ i •'ti~' ' •
~
~
•L
ti
4
V
(j
V
C%L
~
o~
~
u
a:
e~
v
~
..
U
~
ro
~
~
C
~F
i=
~ jp
`~1 ~ N T~ T ~~ 4yf ~
~~
N
Q
~' y I~
C ~
Cl
'p
+` U T G1 O . 7
U Q V„ O~ ~ O.C C ~' 27
:n
:~
~
~ ~
ry 0 ~ 67
;0 ;
3• Q~ ~
Ol
c uCi ~
D
~
rna~p d o~u,
d
.
~ y G~ aCi Q y 6) ~ L b! ~ C t0 'U .z Q1
C C~ o
G O ro5
w Q ~'
`dnj m '`
~
~o°'a :oEac~ a~a~rn
O
cvaia
t
~o
ro~
~~ '~a,
`
`v
L E
~
~~ v c rU
v n C Q C
Q~ d L '
3 u
~Cn O> >
Q'
T
.
c
Y
,~
y V C 1] N~ C O E O d
d
E
E
N N
E C
Q' a; o c
i
h y ~-
`
.
~Q
a`
. ;v..ZO
yn
~'
~~ ro
~ d..z~
o
= A~+
~ 'v~y
cc ~.
=~ c
c~
~
D~
t
~
. o
.ad
y~~ `'~ N U C~ N~ 61
oa. a
~~cd.
o f
~
d
~' ~
y
°• lp
7 y c
i
~~ U
°
c
2
v~nv
+d
:n !R '> c~. ~:n a i~ ro 'L c~
n
~
y
C ~
o
E~ ~ :~
x y
°i EE
E ~
. u+=
o~ .c
a
~
.
d~a a,
i=
ry;5
E~,c
E~o c~°ot,~-c~" A~c~~
C
' 0~0
c~o~ o
i~,
3'ro u
y
~
V `° r
~~,Yo
~
1-
~ d r.a
~~~ ~ ~ o o~''at
g'~'
`°L~
'~~
"m d
r w~~
rn x~
o
3~ "~
rou~ E~ 3 N
rnoo
~,
-
C
y
d
~
O m~ y ,c
i
~
~ t~ v~ N~1 ul E N S~
O~ 61 ~ ti
`o~~o' ;~~v~~adY~
~
c
~ J C~. W G
~g O N
• ~ j IC .~
E.~~i~~
,
~ `= v, u
$ .~ c 1: ;o ~ ,L
''
E~
ry°' 3
~ '°~'rEE ° ~ .Q
U" N a
°'~' ;n ~
~
~ Q, ~ '~ rs
~
°°'
c
i
~
~
~ N O•~ i~ 6~ N,~'7 O Q
m ~~ ~ t o.
'D ~ T
~ u
i
O ZL ~?
Y O cu ~
.
qoa="~~3a•y~~°~30o;~
' ~~c~i ~~v a~~i
a ~.°c~~>.
$ u~ C7f 6i N
~ o O.. E a~ a r~ N w
'u~+ Y ~ m~ 'C~ w~ Y ~
Q1
~
~ t7 o t
di p~
~ E i
a
t Y t~i M .~ 3 a~
a~ 6r tJ
~
,
7 ~ V
N O CJ CJ O ~~
[ RS C~ N N
v ro o~ U,c .~ o.~ ~ o•v 3~. E~ 3 .C
rn C~7~ a v ~~ 3
v~i ~$
i ~, ` O
3. -°~y x ~
Q yj ~ yj ~
~~~ c'~ u~
>
p
~
~
~'
a
~
r
~~ .
°'
`4 n°~~ i 7 ~~ O~ ~
a
y
i c
i c
~
c
.
C7 a
,
° a
a
in Tn - n 0 u 4
• •
-lnc1-
~~r.~a- t i s
C
N
4
U
~
u
a
n
H
0
N
Q
.e
~
d
c
0
.
~
~i.
E
~g
~, ~'
.o
, ~
~
•~ ~
~ _
m
z ~ `~ ~~ ~
o '~ ~ :z F
w c`n O ~
~ s ~ rp' ~
~ p c ~
a~ C]
N. U L ~ c C
O
d ~ ~ c C N
~ ~ N ~
o. ~ ~-- ro .Z
a c~
G7 ~
~ p v> - ~
d O C
°
a ~
~ p
Z ~ d
V 0~ p C
~ O t~
~+
p ~
~ ~' ~
c .
E
R .
.v ~ o
~
C h .
.
~ U
' ~ ~ a
~i ° .Q
ai ~
•'`-~ ~a
' v
y
'
$ >
~
d ~f
>
'
E
~ ~
~ y
~ , J
_. E
E
G~
~
L° ~~ °'
x ~ ~
0
~
y ~'
° o° r
~
`° o O ~
G1
E'~ O ~ .c y c
O,
~ vi y° E ..
d
a ~.
~
~ ~
}- ~ 3 a
i
c~ ~
n
~
o • ~ .~
~
~ ~
>
L ~ `
~ y o
o ~n
.c ~ o ii'o
' ~ +
~, c
p
~ \
'~
7 ~ ~ o
,
N ~ O C~ o .~
'D ~ ~,
(17 ~ fV ~ ~
~ L
C ':)
~'- ~ ~
' ~
.. U
,
~' RS ~ fU ~ '~ t~ L1 D tV 0' E~ W `
'L) .:1 0 fN ~ Q7 ~ ~
~
\ 61
'
y
p C~~ y~
~-' E
~
C~
G
GC7 ~ U
d O•C ~ O~
N a~
.C
t.
~ Nlp
O
O d
c..; oy C
1a-,~va
i~ o .
$.°~ wy> ,
E~~~~`~ D .
.~c°', ~
d
~ /° y 5
c' ~
E w `~ o p r
~ `
~ a~°
`
~ b.~ o
E ~ ~v ~~
U ~ c
° d ~
a
~
~ o
ip o~ •= 0 .
r
~ .~ °. o.
~~•~ v, i~ ~ E a
~
O co y
iv vi .'~~ N ~ c
,~
- ~ ~ 6f
ry ° a n
' y
~n ~
.C
3~ o
~ w~A~
'a
~•
~ a cnoa~~y
o ~
z
~'i o o..
E~~ .c
~ v .cc
AVC N
~m a' E
B o
~'`a
s
.
c
~ao~
~ .
~~
c
ai ~y;c~i~
'
' ~N ~
a~u y~
~
o.;~y°.'~n,E~ c, E~?
d
.. 3
~
~ `~ ~ c ._ ~ ro~
-
u,
~~
° °
•na a~ cn p,
61' o` y
5 o._ a~ o v,
~z am c -R
~n .c
~
~ yt
fQ ~ ,,.
.c~,~. ~,
;d
7' ' >,
.cA~~~~~, Q~p
~
(j
~,E~ ~?
-I
`;;~~ ~
-
:~~n~s'~ f
y
D q
Cj > ~
N-~
c
~7
~
L
~
G. .c ~
O
y ~".
-o .'L
C
E
y ~ ca v
M
~ ~ U 'p ~ t~
C
i ~
~ ~n
~
i ..
C l
~.
C
~,ac~ ~
U
C d
~aoo~~' ~ a
.~ ,O
dc~c°~ ?~~
~~p~ C L~ ~
~~~•
0 ?~ ~
~°'E°~
~g
~v
~~at~ .'U.?_~v'~~ '~
c ~ ain c c'
~ F'cGnc~n~~i ~~'N~.o 3~
~
dvc~ioy~
~ c•
c°ov°.,~E~
I ~~j~~a~ ~ a~i~
u
u
E
u
~ o~~~
~ ~oo~~
. oca~~+'
o~~
ro
' u~'i~ v`~i~c
.
~ . . cA ~ o C
a
¢ u Q ~7 ~.
v~, s~ ~. =^
a o d ~ co ~.!L
e~ • ~v ~
r
~
y u,~ E c~ E
~
• • • • • Q 1-
fl l
C O. U"O O'..-.'
h- lC 1] C1
s ~
U
ry N
W .
` °
~ a
L~ ~
t~', • ~ G)
E r ro E ~ c
i= ~ c Nap."
~ CL.'~'~ O C C~ ,~..
'O
~ a •° :a c o
`
~ 00 a
n~pc~
-lU!-
Pi:9d-1!?,
~ _ - -- - -
c
0
'8.
E
~
rn rn
c
•
C C H
•~ ~ao
.~
.<2 ~..~
7 ~~ C
p~'
~
y a
~L ~ m
~ Y ~
~ Q~ ~..
, E N
o e
v~'i
a~ L v~
~ o ro ~
~~o
~ ,c
~ y
3 '
' C
a ~ ,r.
A "O
-
d~
~ C ~ a
.-~J C'p ro O d ~,o
~~~ p N n.~ .- `
~
w
~'~
ro
rnroc~ncmc a~
a`~ c ~o.
~rn~~~y~'
,n U~n
.`~ oc~v
NN ~
`~~m o;o
o°o
c• "yaf°i~'ia~i~•x
~ cc
v
w ~ o°
v
d ai
~
~~
a~ ,
`
o.~ c a~a a~ ~
~
~a
~' ~°'"b
~
~ ~
° s C
E
v~ v,
EE T t_ • ~v o~ g o, .-
°o~i
id°'~~aN ` ,
~>. a-
~ d m
w~~
'via
,~°1 ~ ~ o
r~ 2~ N
~
~
~ vi o v?~ •o o~
c y -
-
a cv y n;E •
`~ cv
~ N U'
j ~ y C ?, m .O ~~ o• c ~
~
~ Y y
~~
'" ~
~
d-'~- ~~°~~yi ~~
'
~ 1°~''
`E
NO~'
~
~~ N
Ea~i~~' ~+
~ E ~
~...~dp ~
~
~
} v,
, ~ o
ry V O V(~
~
~
~ ~ N d n. U O~
~~
'
'S vOi U~
O C O
d
~ a
~ ~ C
~ O 0~ ~.
:z `~.ci ~ °iE p
X T ro
c1.y~c ~v °' a ~~
~ aa
~
o, ~ N y
d .n ~ •~ o ~ ~, ~, ~ .ic ca ~ o ~'
~ vi
~c+ ~r ~ 5i ;o
a_
~~ ~ m ~~ c fO v~
~~ ci 3 c
r~~ ~ a
~~ d F'n d
•~ ~
~ m
cv a'
~ X ~ c`o~ ~
a~ y a~ v`~
~
> U ~
,
o~ E Et ~ ~i~ ~
~
E EL ~:c
~ ,~ c E c> ....
~ iv a°~ ~~ 'w ~ d~ ~ o
c
~ c
i C z o v ~>
~ ~ 61 ~~
o. ~yr.
.~. °
c~'g E'
N.o U> ~
a~N
ro a° "i
•~ ~ o~• c
o n.•o,y ~.c~ ~
•~ 3~3
~ axi
'~
'n c a
c
0 ~~ c N ~
ca?
o°
'~E ~
W N~ y ~
~ ~ o ,
~
,
1/1 y Ql ~~ (UV ~
•
~
~ ~L a a
Qo
'
°
w
..
~ ~'" ~~~~
3
~.z °.~',`c_~ d s.'~ c .v >,
c.._ ~
~,
u.~,°•n,N y G.~ y E
y~ u~n
`~'i ao
c_
~c
a V C E.~ ~ V ~ E V~'~
d V- V dro~ C~ d~ N
p
~ C y ~
d U y Y «~
C
O
~ CT ~
ti
~ y
a~ Zc
~
o~ ~c~iQW N O
N[ttcaE c~:.i:'~c"v . O t0
C
c`aF-c~F-o ~nn.
ro
~ .
.
.c o ~
-- ~.n
ro .ri
ci 'o
ai ...
o~
~
c
~ ~
~
E '~ c
f- O ~
~U
C ,~.,
O N
G'1 L
r. o
~ O U -- -------~ ~~--
-I02- PC94-li3
~
W
C
~J
1
U
~U
~
~
r_
0
H
47
~
~
.~
t
~'
t.
Q
- ~ ~).1- ~~C~.~~1- 1 ~ .~
0
~
W
c
~
~
U
U
N
~
Cr~i
~
w
~
~
~
t
c
Q
c
0
.~
'~.
F
0
U
d
m ~
C
C
O
C
~ ~ ~?
.O
~ :v7
~ ~n'
~t/) ~~ N N
o °G' o c~n
,~ ~ •y (~ ~ °'
~ ~ ~
cp O ~ c
O
al L.-' .Z (U H c ~, v Q N ~,t~
N ~O rn ~ y O o 0 p ~ p
~ ~U~Eo cw c~'
' c~'
~
~ :~ .~ ~ ~ ~ c d
~ c ~
~
' C ,p
a 'u ~~f,;, a
U u
.m am
~
O
~ ~ ~
~n
O O T
in q~
O~ u ro V = C ~ h N C .=O O
~~,,•°=
~
E `~ ~ ~ m'~ ~ ~
~ y~~~ ~ o ~
ro F_ a,
~
C_ C C~ ~ C O N
'D O ctl .-~ ,.,7 C~ r,~
T O a, ~... cu
~. '~ U C
3
~
~ d
C ~~ ~ c~n t~
ro
~
~ .c~ ~~
~ a ~o
N E
~
d C
ro ~ ~ CJ C
U:O y~ C
U C ..~C N N ` ~ ~ C ~ ~y
Gj ~~ U
.C N ~„ •O ~ C
~ 7 = ~
~ ~
,~ ~ N
~ 7~ C N C~ ~ N F- Q ~~
z ~ p.O C~
' ,~ . D • p - y
`°
'i
ro~r cc .•
E o
'' o'ay uy~Ji ~'>•~ ~ °.o.
~ g
.n n' a
~ cn
o c ro ro
y W
N
= C /1 ~ L L 6
1 ~ L ~ O O
tV O fS1 N
C G W d j -~t
,7 W• V
L
'
C
~ V~~
>_
~~' ~ Y
tU ~
=
~ V
~ C G~ N
~~ j; `N ~~.C ~ Q ) ~~'7 C1
pl ...
S p
U' ~
U~ ' 1' .
.
.1
p)
y C Q1~
O
y .
,«
w C
C~ 7
N
ro a
~ a ro ~
..
.
~ o~ E n.~~ ~~ >...
•~ ~ o
~
o ~ ry• ,
ro ro E
.z
~ o o N c~
c~ ~,
~, ~ c
m~
~
m
N - c E
Rf y `
~ ~
N
n~ c o a'nt~.L-•x v ~•
u q tt1
in E ro i
' 2 _
nm Es'
'U ~ ~
n°' "-';''
ti~O m c
L N
~ ~~~
~
? a tV U
0
~~~. QI Z N N C d~ ~> c
'D G ~ (C ~ N
U ~
t c o•a ¢
~ p N .~ `' G~/~
~ C j U y~ F
~
Q-
-
~ a, ~n
a c w ,.
y
.
~~ iv '~ t co Q' ~ a...
-~ d ~ u- c~ ~v ~ o Y
~ ti °. 3 ay $,
~ o L .
a 5
o~r c~
v
'
~
~ E
~'
U a~
c~
~ d in
t
~ d O~ C. N 7.'x.. ~ vi O U~0 vi
C~ q~
N
d
~ ~ O
~ ro d
~~ L id ~ V N.~ v~ f.l' cO ~~ ~i
C O~ C a v C E C d
+ ~ ~'C j
D ~ fCf1 61 p' j
O
E O N C
p ` U
d~~
r
S= ~
y y C
°'~~i,~~'~°'~ c~i' ~~a~iv~s .
J
'~,~E~ .
°~d~~ C N
oc~
p
~ V~ O~ d
ti S O O~`' ~ E D N~
~ C tC y
~ T~ C
T U f:
'~y aC o a~aa'v QI
U ~U N
~ ~~ C ~O ~ ~~'~ E ~f7~
~~ E y ,
,
~. O ~ ~ S] O7 `y r~ N..~ i1 ~
C C
d
~ 6l ), ti n.
C O~ U
~
O ~ y C
a~
~ 0 E~
G~ Na.t..' LI-
•
.• N y
y a~~ ~ vl
~ aL' C
'
.
~ ~ L N O. O~
O 'o
a~ a O C 6~
¢ a~~ rn c0
y
~ cCi E
r U a ~ c~i ri ~r ~ri tr; i
z Z
I L
U
~ ^
LL
OI
~
W 1 ~
~~ ~ U Q
~~
C CU p~ ~
.
c U
F U
•
'F ccE
N a~ ~c
c=] c° ~
a ~~
a.
~ ~na O1'o" ~ °
'
v,
o
- ?
r_•o-~
' o o'
~ c
~
.
o v
O v~
•. `o ,
c^.n c
~ ~
` On ~ a`m OLJ
n
. m
-1(1•l-
..~`: y'C~~y~. ~~c K~'~"L`
.`
pC94-l13
,:.ti~u.~..~,~-,~'~R.?.~~ ~'" o/IP~, '
~
C
O
~~
~.
E
~
w
c
U
U
~
Oa
0
h
a~
~
~
'v
.ro
c
~
U
N
c
~~ c
o
•
~ ~
5 a~
~ y
• z ~ n ~
~ Q a~i aCi ~ .:
aCi .
~ ~ .
~
~
o Ec
ro° ~~
~ n ~°'
am ~~
N
'~ wwo
yp. c
o
G~
~ ~'n
~ ~'~ ~.~. n,
~> Y ~ ~ ~~Z
'y p'
O ^p O O Up q q~~ 0(~
a ~v. O1~ cw °c_~~ ~~ ~ ~~
N [C'. •O
' C ro
' C~
~ C~
m • .C] ~ Z
a'
C~
t0 ~
~ :v
~
;1.~ ca
~
a.m ~
a.U g
n:m ~
~
n.ov~ am
N
>. O l7~ tt" O .Q «• p)
A Z LC-, 't C dl a :C C~ O u~ ~~ N .~- >
~: ` O ~
~o,v°'~~°cEoo°'a y G ~~~ YCL•d~~ ~a c~ n.vro
a~v ~~ v ~. o m•- ~ :° ~ruv o- ~`~'rn ~ n.~
~ •~ _ ~ ~ in .~ ~ o ~ U .~ ~ ~ c cs :D .n
,O ~ ~ O d y +Utl ~L~~ YM ~d O V ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~~ NA ~
CA ~j '' I_ ~- ~ uf ~ .~ ~ ~ N lll « .O C~
~r ~~i c° ~ ~'a ~ a`~i ~ ~ ~ a w~; c.N~.. ~ W.~'~ a.idU 3 ~~.
N~„ Q, .. d O C N:J 'D C ?.'~7 v, U~ 7 O (~ U~~ t .~ Q) ~
N d d~ f0 ,~ Vl `~r ~~ C N C`u C) :J ~ f~ ~' V~ ~
~n o~ C C) >> ai o ti~`° c ro~ r- '~ `° ~c y O« o~ rn•~ d; E
'o c v~ ~,, ~.n 5~, r.Z _ ~~o ~ E •~ ~ ~ ~ z Q E•~ ,. v,
c o ~ F: °c~ ~~= z' ~ q .y ,_ ~~ y~, ~~ ro K[ o d~ i~ ~ o« E
ro~°~S'v_`°~~ac`~~i a~nn.y ~A ~, nv°,v~' vi. roao~~ = c°~
'G ~«- ta t' ~ N Q._. N~ ~ a~ ~' d~ J E(~ _~ E o o~
~ = NR7~~~ C~:: ~ vi N O C J C y C N~~~ (n j y ~ c0 a L ~ C C
~ ~n y ~ E C Oi ~ C 'O ? cJ d cV =~ iC O ~: ~ O O
~-~ c: o` u~c ° cao~' E~' -~''~ °' Y d~'a~c ~.
~_~ a, ~c E~~~ a~i °~ N N •~-~ Nf°:° o~ C7.~,a'o c~ N E~
v~
~ ~ '(j vr .~ ~ ~ ~ 'O a C ~ d ` Cl R' ~ ~ N '~ ~ r C ~ ~ ~ ~- O ~
N y-'O d~ ~y ~ 4i C d C R7 n. ~ CJ a~'y% ~~7 O N~ lC ~~ '~ ~:V
p, ~ C~ ~~ C U 3« CA .~ O T7 cJ ~ O V O N~ p ~•- w f0
~o~i~rytc°'i' ~'E,ccJ' a~•c~ n,d ~~no.~a C4vN~~~ dm~~~
° ~~:~3N~c~oao ~~cc°n ~'d roo~'~~ rnvcoo~°' 'U°'~'~,
'~_ 3 y.., E ~ ~ rv °' p y ~... v, o~ w~= ~ ~~ ~v
~ '~ n~ :v a._ n, H •. ,., v> m c ~ m a~ F-~ y ~~ a~
c~~°~E(~'o~.°-ya~~ ~°~'«L. E~ °'~~is ~ ~c oc~L ~°.Z'ii>
~, .n~ ~~-•- ~ ~v:. ~o y uc
~o cvv n_~n~ac°' v,Y~r °~ oc~u~ry•~ poa~.D~ ~~~oa~p
~~;O N O 4j ~ 7 y= 7 Vl > U ~p "O d N C d~ a N~~ ~~ ~ O~ U
u~i ~ c~i dia v wt~ ` c°'i ~~ c f0 0~~~ c' ~ o ro ~n E o~ ~ ~
ar ~ ro~`~v N N:N y c ~~s a c~ o.~ ~°~~ ~ n.~~ go a'~ ~~;
°i3c°'irodc~d~~`aci"= p~a~io ~'~ L2"cio.'n Qc~~~°a°io ry.~d~'a°~
II -- ro~ ~ 3a. m v, E°I u. E u w a i-- ~ o•.rh~ wi- •. crrn~ r~ arn
L m t r
W '~ W v w w w
4~ O O
O,p N
0 '0 cC
p
O
O
O
~ ~p
~ ~ '~ ~=
U Q
C71 ~
U j
~ N
G ;
c I
'Eron"Q, c~uE ~ c~v~ ` ac ~E
~ 'U (
C N ~
~ 0 N V! ~ Ll. Q U
1
~ t
n
N
N (1.
.; p
(n Q~)
° ~n
~ ~
° c r"' O
'
` p1 ~
I S
~ ~~
o ~ CT
C-
.
~
~
o ~ a ~~
o ~ ~
O
°i Q ~ •
~~~ .~ `
g`~ n
,r
o.~
a`.ii c'u: ~ am O~J I cima riC7 dcn
-105-
P(:~d-113
N
¢
LL!
G
ro
'a
~
C1
n~
~
C
0
a~
tr
.t
~
~
cl
Q
C
O
.
~
~
E
q
C)
~
•~
o ~ ~ a~
~~,m
~ u~i o~i ~ 5 o O c ~
.~ ~ a~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ \
a ~
~,N
~.,N ~
E C
t
y ~ '~ p 4
Y
'~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ N
U~ a: ,Z
C
°~~ w E
c
° c~ c
°f ~ n~i c m 3~ aNi >. ~
~,
tA
a7 ~C y
C _
~C :D
C ~ ~C 'D
C .V V C RS
~ B
2~ C
CC Iq '~
a'm fV '~
a.m ~
iL ~~7
n.m ,
7 41 N O~
aOCnU~
~ ~p
U 3j
p c ~
Q 0; m O
tG ~
>. '«~ N GS ~
.L.. C ~~n
~ p yN ~~'~ c~C ti~ Q
~ O~
U
a ~ ro
~
-o > r„ tC ~ v^
o~ .- ,
q~ Z7
E~ ro ui U
U~ tl
~~' d R ti ~
c 7 ~
~ ~ a
y
~ .C ~ ~ ~
~
C L' v
~° ~
~ '> ~ f0
'
~ ~ i .
o
o
~Q R7 .U H tn UI lC
° '
~. .
~.iv ro~ ~,
v,
c~.o ~, v
y o
s~~ r~...~
~ ~> Z E m
c^'
8
Mo~,~,
~~x~C .~ roE .-~ai--~~ roo ~
~o;~~•- ~°" ~,....
~ cti yo~? ~~~~ ~~o"vi roo °'f0aci°'~ ~E c~ui
~.~aD~ ~~~~Q ~c~ad yd ~~c~oac° N~ E~
~
~a ~ ~v ~
a~ E o
~ ~'~s
a ~ O G~ y
~ ro ~ a~ E ° '"o ~' o
O .C C
E a`~ "'
°
' .r N N T
~c `~°' ~
` ~~' U .L .C c~ Q
E ~-- E 4)
'~
~ '~ =~~~~ N r- ~ C
`,
pC E a~ a v, o~
,.'
~?
~
~ m
,n n, o
N`°a~°
- .n
~~;c~
d a w a,
~~vro~
>> ~ n.
E° a c
C
p.r~ `
>-yocroo ~o.o`~v
~ ~ ~
T
~' _
~ o a~
~"
~`~'a
r
= ~ _ N
~ ~ ~ co
_ a~
ca' E N~ 1tl~ `° ~ u~
~
z .c c° c
v~ 3 ow ~ .c
~n ~ a
~n ar y v~ c .
U ~n~ ro c E o-R7 E~~
a
`y •~ iq " d
>
'
~ a~ ~ O~
"' c~~J ~~ civ
~
' C~ C
' L. c~"u O m~~_ T U O O C
l
ro
ro V N f]
C
~
~
p, 'q
j
O ~~p ~ ~ ~.
C1
O u~ O ~
Ll
L
Q ro O~ Cl
p
O Q '
~ ~' ~(]
~
~ O
p C 7 m~ T~
> o axi~ o >'~~ m
u~ >>, E~
`°
°' >v
y ~
N> ro•~~> c ~°D ~.~~i
°'
c n
w.. c'~~
~~
~ n
~ o~
a
~ 'c ~ °'
~ c~i ~ ai ~
~ a ~
0
~, ~
n ~ 'c ° `v
Z ~ ~ c ~
T
i
C~ N N p
~~° iu '~ C~ CU
~~o a~ C`~ F
o Q i
C`v
3 0 , .
a C N~ C aj ~ C N C d
~ E c~~ G; c~
c o o~
v a~i ~'~ ~ ~
.~7 v.C O ~ L ~ ~ U ;
~~ ~f~\U ~ C o~i 6~
r~«+ E;O
U 7.
C in ~ a ~ G ro al L~
a~ y~ c y ~ ~ p ~~ ~ O
a ~ ro o x
.~ ~_
E ai
o~ o~~m o~' c o ~
o~ x o~'S ~~ ro'fl ~v°' a
a c"i ~a~, n. ao ~o ao ~°~ an ' co ~p ~n m.c ~d o
c a°>s~'o
a c~
j
~ L°a`~ic
I- a v~ .~'c~oc
1- c .c~
~-- v ~.c~~~ cc
(7 F- ~ a cc ~ ro .o
- a
., ._
U
V
"'
C~ N
~ C.L in
LL
~ W ~ p ro ls' ~~ ii_
~ ~ T~ U
_ ~ C7 ~ '~ 0.. ~
~ V ~ V ~ N ~I > p~ U
E `°°- `°E m~y
rno ~ a~v0 I
~~
~ N o N~ c
`'
U.. . ~ p
' a
~ d
°' m
Q
~
p co
.D
O~
O p~
y
C
•~
. ~
O C~ ` C
~
I O~ O? O C= C v ~ MLL-L
~ ti n`. ¢~ ci cn m O~L ci c7 0?
L- - -- -
-IOG-
PC94-113
~
0
.~
c`5.
E
U ~ --i
I --
rn
c:
.O
~ ~
~
~
c
~ c
c °'
c i E
a` u`, E F . 3
U
S
~ a> O.
C O
md C ~
,
ad ~
[~i.
C
E ~
• C
N O
c > c
y C ~ c > c
N~ y
~
n
40
~
t
~
a
.l
~
-'Z
~ ~Gl
-~j
o ~U
c •.-
-
G) .L'
DO t~
O. O)
a~ c
° '= ~
~
`~
~ y E ~
~ ~ 1 E '~'
~
U e
a; °' °'
c
~ .
y
N (~
~~
~ p U
~y
~ a c~
C ~
C C N
;L ~GD O
`1
~ ,
a'c~v~
aocii
~ N N
aa
~w
t-.
p ~- (n
LLI O ~ T t cy
CLI- ~ C '~
~~ C
O
.
p ~~ ~ t1 '. :L ~ O"
~ O cN.~
~
Z ~ ~ o ab C
~ E°L' ~ ro p,
c`° n ~ ,~
°
c ~ 6Ci
a E
o -~
ar.."~ c~ ~a' m
~
~ a
i
~ o~ ca o~ a, ~c0
~ ~
~
~ N
L~ a~
~'g.L~
C~~
~'~
~o ~
~' ~~W~
~ ~o~cE ar
mn." T
bc n~,
r._
~~~i ~n• ~.~~- p ~'~o ;
~ ~ c~~
' o.E '~,y ° E `c~~•~ roro p ~~
° ` d `
~ `' m ~ o, °' a
ro`" '^~'`a
°
`n ° ~ ~
U
o v .c t~ o a~
~ ' ,~ '~ .g '=' o U
o"' ~' u.
~
c
~c
~ c
`~
U ,
pp
~ -;
vc
y !a,
~
~ ~
~ c~
'
~~~'° ~~
G
r ;
d~c,_c
ow~i`ro v c
c
~c~'v~ .. o
ac 3
°~
~~
v° a
,~
ro ~, r
E
•n
'
° ~
n.
~a
ro
E L° ar a~ ~~ c~,o c7 Vi c .
,
er n . i4 ca a
,
_,a y c~
~ 'E p~ n- ro~¢ ~ N~~ V
~`~ a 5% ~
O1
° ~ p~ W
~
' ~~ a> ~ y
~
S n~~
~
' iC A~
2 ~
C o
m
~ ~
-
E a-
„'~E~p ~~?~o ~ns
" o'
`
C i
,_E~ ~ co
n~
_>.a ~ "r
6
,
_,~''^~ •c E
. ~°
'u ~
tn'$~
t9
~
~ ~- r~ a () • .C ~i " U w
~~' CNT 67 ~~ .D Of ~
CJ 3
V
,n .~ ^1 N ~^ y
G. N
¢ o
`a r~y ''~ ~ ~
L ~7 ~>~
v' 8i ~ .: L G
t Q~ r
N U N
~p
L fJ Vl tn
N d n W ~
~:. fJ '~
I c o,
ry C lA ii
y 7 C .~. L~ U. Vl ~~~ ~
. r
~' ~ u p'*~ ..
v~ ~
~ s~ ~
~ G~ Q tJ
n. ro. vi .~!
Gr :.p cC9
r.i ~~ a
6~ b ~ C)
~
a d ~
G T
,~
o~ c:'~ .c:~~u
~~ r
~n . o> ti~
~ ~~c Ec~ti
' ~ c,
c
~'
G ~
v,E~
'~ O~~
~,
`
~ ns in a T~ c%~ `t~' ~ n.-
ro ~ E
v o~~ ~~
cv = r~ c~
~~ o v+ v ,
~
~ t. ~ r
~~.:- ~
` Z~ c~i
a
O C O~ O~
'd ~ G~'$
~
' v~ ~ v'~i b O L c X -~ r. ~~.~ ~
~G.r ~
` ~ y~
a~ C C
J V O~~
y ~~
~
~
U
r
~~ V~ iJ)
~ r.i C j~ 1~
+
~~ rJ V ~~ ~ ~ ~.C ~C~7
r,
J lU y l'J
~
~
~
1~ ~
« O
O C y p L U~,. .. C cn
vl
f.~ ~.C ~
~ CA ~
~ 3:Z ^'
~ p ~~
~' r 6~~ y J
~ ~
~ i9 c ~
~ ~~j C: ~ p L N C
:.~ C r0
~ N O QI p!'J
L
~ a~ .N.
V) ,~ Q ~
O.
~~, n
W L~
d
^
C_~. 6~
C1 V
.C-
ci
~.~" C~?S ~~'3 d.
~
~3~ Y ~
~ 3~
o
o~•~~ Cy
~E ~'~J ~j
U~
~
.
c~~j~°~~rn~;~"~~'cv ..
~i'{,,~ C G
~.
~i=
~~~a `z~=v~i aw~~•St m,~~,.:
y~~~i7 4 fS C.~, ~„ ~ v~ r:
n. "• ~ v
r=~~3T1a~c~c~~.°~~ CJ ~.~ •Y
i: u
. rc~-r.ro .
y~ cs w rJ 4
.c vr
r-~~ rog'
--------- rJ ~'V ~
,c c
'r.3a~
{-~--°° ry ^~ V1
t I%
--> o ~ L~~
aUo~
V
~
~,
'% ~ ~ c
o
E
~
V
~
V Y L C
~ ~ ~
q
ti
'
C'-
~i c'_
~~
~ r ~ ~r
w
y~ O
I~ ~
~
; `ry
o ~ a ~'
r
~~
[. t~
u. ~,~
:3 Q
a~ ~
~i fy _1
..
u
:
~
~ ~ c r K U ~ n c ~
.
'-
'- ccia l
t~;°~ c]C w;; ~ ~~ ~v
o G' ~
~ c~~ ~~i ~~ .o c 4' 'v o o °~ 2
ij ~y ~ r'' Gj ~ ~ :~ ~_ -ti ~ I C T~ ,~'{ N a
i n` t7 0. i~ ~ r, O U
l
..
3 ~'~ cr ..
..
I r,.
l n: ~ ~c
~l =~ 1~._. _.._~~ -,._._:~-_-c-_y:. _ ~ _.-~- ~_ _.-~~-_~ _
'
.:~-~ ,--;, _~_._ _.......,.....,._ _
, .,,_~~.:.~._- . ~--,~~-r-:
_~~-••_ r~:~~.t-, i:,
~
~u
c:
~o
o:
:
u
~~1
~
0
cr
i:
:7
~
C
O
.
~
a
[
U
C~
a
c
.`
U
.~
O
S
~
~
C
C
C
n
,~ E
c E
r E
~
c
~ o ~ C.~
~ m n~ d
IL lL lL
~ d ~ d C ~ ~
G N
r
'G v
V
C7 ~~ d ~T
~
7 G vl ~p,
T
CN ; ~C N
_. ~ U ~ QI p, «~
'O ~ ~t~7 a~ a 'O C c9 C 1~
6) t~ V G7 Q N~ U C N N~ 2 ti (n ~ N~ y C 1t~
N
C
.... 7 Q
U C v~
~ N n Y
a1 }~ ,L' C .
f6 U ~' ~~ N O y-U' y 1] ~„~ ~ ~/7
C 7 p LL' N y O. . O. p~ t~ d N
a
C
~
V' 1~ ~ C 4' ~..n
~~ ~ V T C 7`~
~' ~ ~~y ro Q' G O
~ v C S
E_•O y 7 0 L U
~
~ ~ C
o~ O. ~ ' Q ~
N~ ~
y
y -p ~ N ~ v~ C p = ,D D E ~ ,~,7
cE~~•np~
~
Eco ~n ~i~[~
d ac•
`°N~ ~ o ~
'v
r~c .
.
a~ ~ H a, ~ c, Q'u~ C ~ E a~
a~ `.i oo c~~o~aE`~`°.i~
I i
U
N cn ~ N y w t
~ ~
` Or
f N 1? K G
N~•{ q
X O
~ ~. a~ Ll C3 C S~ U'~ cG ~ C~
~ C ~ 61
N ti'Ci L LO N 0' ~ A y~
L~: „; 7.p1
I T i9 N Q~ Y.C CT ~
C l s ~ d ~ y~ D~.._ r ~ C d n
~
M -- r „
y`~
yy O~
T) ~ Z'L7
7
7 ry
a .
~ 0 tl ~~ rl L L7 ~:.1 ~~,: N~ O V
~ w ~ IU N
W d Q)
~
L '~ ~_.
~ G V L
j7
r:~ W~
. y
y~
Q
p~ N ~ L~~4i j~ V Q p ~ G j ~~
LL
N
y a
~
j 6~ b ~ ~ ~
d Z)
y ~
fn C G
~}~
S
C
6
~
O
~
I T C C N
-.~ t.
~,G
y~ V G 67
.
~
t~ry "' C t,~ 6~ ['. 'C3 L~~~
w Or
t ,~„ N L~ V~~ 4 17 ,~ O
I ~ ~ .~ ~
~
v y 61 r ~
~:~,r o w
~ ~ 4 ~ 'a R3 ~ ~ ~ C .1.~ > ~ '~a
yQ .r~ ~~ c.~ p m x~ 3~~ E~~i
` ~r ~ ~C 3 -. ~S ~ `v~{ ~ a~ 3 ~
,g 4: c, ~ ~ ~'
~ ~ O
~
~d ~
`~~ n $~ ~n~°
~~' r. ~ ~
.
'
.r ,~~dG~Q,.,E~~s~o. ~wO
~pV ~, ~~'~•~ a~ u vc: o•~n E•E aO
'
4 C
~y3 ~j..°i. rJ T1
'"iT~ ~'' ~~ ~ ~ c7
G~ y y tJ
Ny r~ ctUO yd ~~v ii iir. ~d %•:
C
~ [[~ff L
~ !
~
~ ~ L U ~ ~
h~1 ~ n. ~n N C n. 3 n ~ V 'U 6i
c :n s
,
w w n o.~ w
i o
v~
~' C
y u
'
ci °i v..
~ n~ ~~~c ~U ~
I
~' ~a ~a c~ G ~a
~ = ~ r. ~ yQl V ? c
I vv ~'~ n~n ci =
{!
" 0.~
~~.~:._~~~_ G C_~ L L. ~'
~~^3'~..s_~. ~ !L Cl
~'-."-~''_.____ _" "_~ "____.._.~~.___._...~
~ ~~)7{~
~~~.~~•~ ~ ~ ~ .~
¢
w
C
ro
a`
U
:I
C1
ca
r.
0
N
CJ
~
~
.~
1'
~
C
O
N
Q~
E
~~
o~
c
0
~
r
o >• ~~ c
t ~ ~~,o
~
•
O N V N ~
E 3 ~
m ~
~ ~
E
E
~ r L C~ C
vr
$ a°' a a ~
~
~ ~ ~ `
lL d
W d ~
~
U_ O W
~~
d y
N~ v> y~ d
~ ~~ c d~ ~'~~~
~
u~'
~~ ~ ~
'g 4
'
u2i ~
~ E ~
~
~ti a c
o
v
i?:
~ O
w
v~
~ m
t
°'
°
cT ro
a, d ~~ p ~ y n s ~
` o ~
cn ~
-
N• ~~ ~
c
o
y ~ I- '~ ~ia
~' o u.
~
y
~,
o o d ~, d
~
.. ,~ o ... c ~ u~ v~ y w
V d ~ o o,
. c ,y c.~
L- o• ~
C
~ .c
~~~3
~
~~y `°aciEm "~~. 5•~~~~~
`°.'' a
~ ~'~
ti ~c~o~
`~ro~n
~ ayc~'i
°
~o~~
Ep.v ~
E°.~m 'n o~ ~ a°~ dt
rnT ~.
c d `
~,-
c
a
~
`~ d`~' ~N
°'Nv
y ro
~`c~.iac ocd.c :'~ .a+ ~i°c>-°,a~ `.~'" .
c
o
o3~.u.o"' L`~
rooT~~ ~°''o; 3tirn ~c~vo.c mcn
a
o c ~v y co a ~ ~ ~ ° [ o Hn,
c a~.o
E U•`t''~y,yc
' ~.a~
°
~
~
p
t" ~ E:i: ~~~ N a:~ i,~ O G'1 U t~ C
V ~i
ty > L= ~.a l~
.~ ~
' A C T -. •c
pa
W (:
N •- .G V y a ~ ~ a 4~ ~
'D Ul y!t
d N~ ~~ d~y
C~' V~
C ~ C ~ ~ V V O
A a ~ O F O.C
~ Q) ~ N C d O
Q1 t:
~ ~
~
d¢~~ct~~.~`~-~~..c d.~'n N'~Ero~ro ~,c°'v '~ya=a~ a"'ic~
N
~ C3 O ~ p. E in tV U U ~? ~~ d ti Vl v~~
D~
~~
'
~~ ~ N
~ L C Q"' ~ G
~
d
'~ C7 V p, ~
C
d O U d Q a Q tM0 IA a .O
~7
v!
y(,) '~ ~ U V 4= ' N a ~. ~~ CR. ~ y~~ U
' y
p ~
N-
I~
6) N d~a..~ .L C.-
' ~ 7 y~
~q ~' t~y-. ~M„
Q, y w ~ Y Cfl TJ L fY Q C U N~ 6. Z
j,
~
~ O•-
~ O Ll 4
7 VI ~~~
~ L N
N~
~ G) ~ 7c d RS
.t_ N
al ~ N L ? E iN ~ 3
~~JC N C Cll ~ t Cl C U t N
••
r C
~
~ i
d C
N V G7 ~ U~6
1 61 61 M
y Il- C a ~~
G~ y ~ t~
y p C
~
U
~
y
~
cp ~.~
j N > tV tC O
l7 6' ct3 ~
~ O. ~ 7
a
~a U U 41 ~1
~
4 ~~ R v
l ~
,
C
]. ~ C~ T~ C ~ y.L
'Q N
d RT'. .4..1 W
~ L~ C d~~ ~ ..~4 ~
vO
~9
1'
f
~
F
~
~ 6~ C
E
~ 0~ «. CJ
~y .L ~
C V N L'L1 ~~
` .1~1
N 0L
y, ~~ C' '~
'
.
i O
.,
U«
C
j,
,~
q O t~ ~ y
U~, n ~ C O iV N ~ ~' ~~ a ~~ L U~ ~
~ m c 3 ~ ~•~
U a~r
~b R
~• ~ a
~ $ r
~ t~V O C`v p t`
~n'
,~ ~
'~ 3, ~ iV p
3 V ~~
v~'d'i~i
Y
_
~
~ ~
~
~, d A ~a ;
~
.:c u
~° ~d, 'v, ~ ~ o N a a ~
ar • .~
y
ar c~ ~ ~
a~i ~ g~
p
'
,
a~ d S C c O.~ > y~tp E ~.~ a C O= ~ 'N'Q~ n d`y' cQ (~
~ ~~ t t' ~~l ~~ Q ti
n L ~ t(~ O~ N~L ~ U Q'U c' 'L3 ~n N` Y "' .
C
p = 00. 1]
~ a y t~ p C ~ a
C
L ~ Ci Q ct1
C~ C
C
N~ ro
G~ cC ~ V N
L~ ;(' t J M y~.
ci
`
' ~
.~ C1
~
1: 7~
c 67 p U 7+
U
l: U C U
~- tL ~v ~v a ro ~~S y d
L
~- ~i •.~.~. ~
3 . . ., . ~ ~...
u ._ a ~ ~
-- ~
~ . ~..
--
...~_ --
N L
U N
c
~
~ W ~
O f3 ~ ~ ~ Gr
C
E ° .
LL N ' 'F ~
~ ° I
~ L
U
~
~ ~a o ~n°'
W "~ E
O~
C ~~,U,,, p C p~
d
o ~ ` ;0 G' p
o . a o ~~
• .p ~v
2m 3
~
m ~ am
n`
n`.~
~
~ _~ ~~ '~ _~' ~~__~-~~~._~~_~ _
.
~,~~~~~ _.~ _'~-~._...~._.
_~Il()~
E~~..t~~1 ~ ~ ~ ~
c:
V
d
f7
fi
N
ti
¢
;
0 :~---- ~ _ - = ~-
, ;~
I ~
E
q
C7
~
c
0
.~
c
~
o aCi aCi
C aCi
C aCi
~
d ~
~ ~ ~ p
f].
y U U U U
~ o°. a n°. a°.
C77 N y
E ~ C
" O 'n
d
~ y C~
•
o
.~.
~
U ~ ~
°
~ ~
~~
•~ ~
E
~
~
U~~ UI Go .Te C
N ~
V~ fJ C:7 7(~ N
~ N h,~
N N ~i
U 0~
c
9
~d°'~
~ O
(
a
g5 .v ,
~~o~~ N.~~r.?
o
,.
Cf - G~ Y
~- n
.
N~~ d~ V.. d-~-'~- C
C
' ~ y e
~ ~
«,
'. ~ U c c~
O N~'~ ~ « Q ~ E ~
O t7. `n C C p ~.
~
y ~
~ C> ~ ` N
Qi
~~
N Q Y ~ N
C cl '0 Q~ N N 0~ ~, ~
C«.L. 'C' ~'~ ~C C'.'r..', O U
,Z N N fq ~ f7
._.
'O C
~ ~ rn . ~
aa~~:Sc ~ ~ p p ~
ar.~a~ a y . v ~
~~~>c ~
ro ~ C •
yv,~o~
.E Y ~ " ~ •E '~ ~ o ~ ~
v ~ E ai ~E o ~ ~ ~
' ~~'c g,° •~~~a o o~ ~'y ~
d ~U'E ro
.
uf
ro
a N C q~
- ~ i~ .S
c~'d y p«
" ro u .~?
~>~' >• a i U O
G•j G
~ ~ O•~
c~
1 -y ~ a
'E G~
~=
~ t
~ a~ ~ rn
.N. a~~~ r_
a~ v.
~ y U'O C a> d
0) o ~ l?
a caV aUi ~~ ~~ ~~ C
O 4~ 0 •~ ~
~
7 ' ~n V 0.
'
p C~
~ ~ o 6i
O QI
d~ ~: aE O
~
a
ry ~~ ~i d C~
~ y
~ «
_ $
~
~o~•sc~
C
C
C
~ y
-
r w~vCau
N
~ y C 6~
N w~oy~
t
~ L: C V .
wo
~ N
Vl y'~-'
i
6
r
,
Cl ~> C L c~t3 ~
Gr ~~ N
'
d 6~
o~'g ~J ~'i
rnro ~
3~'~y ~~.~
p d o d"
o a.~
~
~
o' o~E-"~
o ~ c
o~ a~;
° o
~ ~a
;
~ .`
C... v~i ~~ Qj • ~y
~... j~ vr ij _a,o
~ O ~ v~
~ro
~
"~ ~ y~~~ ~c
G
~
OFF.°° '~«d~d
~ ~
~
N a
ic
o
n,~.~~,a `-° w
~ a~•~ v, v
, a
ro
~
ry 3~~
a
d'> c
~ a~~ ~
« '
ai ~ ai
y:
'u e
~ O
~ n d~~ a
i a
i v
+
F
~C] 'ii E E
'~ 0
,C
F- a~' ~
c~ ~ S
~:
-- 3~~'
v
. .
1
- .
~ ~
~~
w w
`° ° '
o
~
d o
~
'~ ~:
~..: ~ «. ;j
~~WE ~E:, ~
' C.
!oE
F- Q ~- C a '~ ~`
[L ~ G. N L)
C ''' r'' ~
~a
o~C~' o~rn
~ c"
o ~ o~'
•° ~ ~ ~ •°- ~ ro c ~i. •°- ~
~
`
~ a`.u. ~cn cimcL
-- -- -- ------ UO
_~. ..~~ a`m
_____.______-
PC:4)d-1 l3
~
a
W
e
~
~
U
U
W
~
O
ci
~
E
'Q,
L
~
C
4
c:
0
.~
a
E
Cg
rn
c
0
~ c
N
o E
~ L~y
O y
~ O
~ ~
V/ V
C C
~ g
N ~
y C
(L ~tC
2
N ~
« ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ >~
fU . -
~~~ ~OL ~ 'U >•~ aN
C N W ~ ..~-. ~ ~ .t.,
O~~~ O ro E N Ol y `~ y.
,~ ~ ~Oa ad 3 c d c ~
C y Q O> tT O ~
~V d C U C;~ ~.fl .j, 7•~ Q
N d N ~
y O>>O O,. O y V ~~~ U~
~ o~U ~ o ro ~ '~' o ~ ~v
ac°',,~~Em3~' o~V •°Ca
d ~o
d .n~?c"'oT~°~t~''d~G'Op~~~ E~
= N~} ry,y ~''~ ~ Gj Q1 a 67 fU
61 N ~ y
~ ~~~,~3ryE~~~,E~~cn .Qm
~~vc~Gr.~a~o~~oo~
po~4~y V m~ac.,`°~~N'~o
.s...a~ °~,' ` `~ ~'u.•vv a
ro
a?i a~i `c~i ~' A ~ w 'i'~4 .r~. ° ~ ;~ ~ ~,~,d„ 5
~ E~V ~C- t~ c d
~ C¢ N~ CJ~ N y ~ w:~ (~ ~ N
> ~~ ~'L Ob'n~ ~ ~ 01v7 ~~pv~i
~, y T
~' O ~ tU '~~1 N ~ ~ C ~'~' ~ G ~ C1 ~
~ y C m c~ G O H'j E~~f' O
° ~ ,°~•°'`t ~'°' ° iaon`.U~a o
C N
a G C G~ E~ C
~ ~N R1 ~ ~ ~7 D '`' 0)
f..~~cvU~ u E rnN~ ci ~o
r ~
U C
~ ~C
W ~ ~ N
y «~ O
O O ~
C V ~ (i l6
'F ; ~ ~ ~
d
~ t~n0, L~ C
a ' = r?
~ c~ ~ ~D U
v~~c~~s'
n`.m ~:i. ~
~
U ~O > ,~p
V U G ~
C 6~1 ~ d ~ = C
p N Ol N U ~ y~
C.1 d«L+ C ~~- y N N
~E~. o ~° ~ mL+
~j N.f] V N R1 y~
(L a 0 'i.j ~ 7~ fC y
aE~oy m' `.1cEv~
umv~r°'-~ ca °~~'o°'~
~
~ y d:E U T E N N'a
~ a~ C N J'- O N U N
cn O~ri ~ r_ c~ ~y a. ~ d o ~
c',%~a~ cc ~
~> R~ O QI 6~ y U t' ~~ ~
Z7 ~ Q' G fT V O. V~l ~. 7 .M..
N 01 Ll ~,Q V' V~ v Q O•7~ O`G.
a~i~o~°c''~p~~ O1~o~.~.x
d T V C U C ~ ~V ~ U ~ U
~. ~ ~• ~cu~ ~, ~.~, ~d V a
~c'Tc~i~=d°'~~, `°'a~o~
d~~c u~~° v~ ro aN ~~ ~
~ « 3 ~`r~._ ~~°o o~v c~ ~•~ u
y N Q~ O 01 c0 ~ p~ ~O «. p CT ~
N~ O Q C y C~.C C VCI Of ~.C
E d ' ~ ~ v,
o~~'~~°o~~,~~°c,~2'.4n aL
y '
~ m ~ C ~c: .~ ~U .p 'C U p O ~ "' O
a~a ~ v~ oii ii~u`°. o.a:' oa`
~~ ~~t0
l=~ ~~ • • • • •
-lll-
f'(:94•• l l i
c
0
. _ _~____~ -
~
'S.
E
Ci
~ C~ U
C
. 'O
.' a
O
. G
,
m y
w
O Y ~
2 ~
~' N
r ~' C
E
o a
i u
d ~
~ n t' 2
~ ~
~ ~ a~ ~
~
C ~ ~
) ci aCi
=
y
~
~f0 C !i
ro ~
O ,t
~
'
~ W
~ f1
N ~
~ d ~ ~
ro c ~ °' y
~ o
d ~ o s ~ ro ~
« ti o~ E .
Hry°Q- iy
c 3° d>
~
.o ~
~° °' °
'
°o ~ «? iC O ~
- 3~ i C ~
'v
' ~ N
~ .i-' o
o d
ayi o~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~n :~ .~ v~ ~, ~
y ~
~ u ~ ro 3
~ y ~ C7> ~' ~ y~
~ ~ C
« ty O~ O> V y
~E
' ~ 0. v~
N Ri
~fp C d~ t ~~ ~. N.D d _ `y.
C
uj
N
7 'C
N
C
y T1 U~~.
N N
O d N N fV ~~ N ~
~. T) E C•C' q L ~
..~ '0 y N
~ ~
V ~
N ~ N '
- y~j ~ ~.~. ~ Rt N y N V O 2 ~ v) N .
?. L a
T ~
~ ~(~
°' a Iq f2 •~ t Ll C ~ a
~--
°' O~C y y N 171
~ C C
o
~
~ O G ~v, o~
~
C ~ ~
O .~ ~ •
E a
' r
7 ~
a L
a
=
~ c v~~ ~ ~v
~
t
i ~
~ °
.
a`
~
~ y ~ F~
i ~.
O
~~` U L ` ~
L` fn ~
.
c~
a
N~i ~ cV U C ~j', R v
i u~
v
C N O C C~•` ,C
C~ ~.
c`~n o. ~ vf°ia~E~v~i ~~ ro~vnc°. vu'~ '~~Eyc.~ic~ 'n ~
~ E~
a `°o~ nc
'~
~ y3 ~~`on-croi°~ crou°~
a
'~
~ oi.~c~v`~.`~E
y
L
a a c
~
o
'"
~ c
i ~
~~
~d°i~v, ~ c
a~ ~
~ c
g
',~ m '°`
c~
a°"ocj N
.L
y a
~c~~c;~ ~
o~
. C3'
.~y~ N ~ d ro d
Tr~.• V ~
dw ,
•
~ ~ ~ C ~~1f Y ~" ~
~ ro c•~~
' (0 O r ~ ~ d
~ro33~~y ~ ~
~.
~'°~ .~
d~nv;~
' c~uo av
ayiroy~a~ ~~~,~N,~H~. Uc~^.
~ N~
'
' ~~-
~~.~
'rn
o~u ~~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 3 ~3 ~ ~ ~' ~~ ~, c
•
~
~' R';a o ~b
~
4
~
,,wo>.
~ .
o
E ~a ~
`ro.N` ~
~ ~~.Q To
~~ a
o;
a~
o ~° c c c W
o u~ o o E,$ o c~~ a~ ~~ ~ o~ a`,'r ~
~
-
• ~ o$v
i
rnc
~ ~N
. ~un
'~ c'~
• ~,
N~ ~a.~~
>,
~ O~O O
N~'Q
~ ~
~
m b
U O O O O
N 9 U E cu~ c
~ ry~~
$
U
~ 0~ C~
Y O N
a O
i
v. 6
a E ~` 3 d y N~ N N j N N G 1~/7 d
~ ul
~ l0 N~
~
~
~ 0. CL U U U ~ ..~i L1 L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Cl t
` :+~ ~ ~ f0 :~ ~ t7 ~ RS (1 ~ ~ ~.
.
~y ~ ~ u, ~~ m c
~
.c
--a.
.... .L ~
--.... r_ °' o °' 3 d
rouEo ...
.. .. .
. .
U U ~
aUi
W V
:1J ~37 0 p y
~
° ~
O
~
o 0 0
a
~
c
U
rn
~ rn
~ U
j~E ~.: a,
ov ~
~ E m m•~
~
-- =
O
c N d
w cL N ~
~n n. ~ v c v c
u~
cno
c•-- ~
o~ ~~aio
~c
~ c E m c~ ~~Fn
ro
°aia -
o?_'
o.° a~ N ~'a
L_ c a
_° °
_._ am
_ a`m Eii. ~UO
_
_ _ __~
-it: - rr.~n-ii;
rn
¢~
w`
c
~o
O.
~
.~
~
~
0
H
N
~
E
.~
r
~
c
~
c
0
~a,
a
E
U
of
c `- '~
~ c° E
c ~ ~
0
~ c
o ~ ~~
~
~
'vS a °c'
Gp (] ~
O. ~ G G
~ ~= C~ ~
~WO
- Y ~ ~ ~J cy ~ II
u~ Gl N C
~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d '~ C c ~i ° ~ °' o c~
~ ~ C~~' C y C G G~i •~~t d d ~ E c:
~ o c~i~ o~ ti> >~ v~ aGi v~ C~ a ~ >. E ~
~ c y o:~ a ~ LL- o c ~. d E.~~ o'o E.n o~
.. > ya ~ ~ c o.~ y~,i~~•~, .c
d o~ aO,n ~,• ~o v; o, E a~ o yr. C ~-- U °~ v~
cc~u~E°'o`~~c~m~'~N~n~°'rn.~y~°. ~r >'~u >
E;~' c~~ y`~ c y E E ~ ~~~E'~ N€ EQ ~ c°v ~a ~ d~
~"~`~NC~v,~nyi~~.~ xa'~,oM~o>~~ w`~ ~d °~
rn d.-~~ N ~ ttf c~•c w n d c w a~'~. O c~' c~ ,p cU ~
ro~~ ~~- -' U V~ ~ U Y o ai Cn «~ ~~ O. O~ .D ~ ., ..
ro O ~ N fU O~. T~ f0 d~ C N E~ N ~~ ~,C •Q .O
~ ~ U ~t ~v ~'C ~ ~~~ ~' ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~~-°~ °' Q ~v ZL
c , ~' .
y ~r.'OcE~u`~i~~ro~R~°''-,~>,N°'roi.~m G~ c> C~.
E n.. a~ n~ ro
~ n~+¢ >.~ d aw a~i o w aZi ~n ~.v~i~ ~' c i~ ~ o E o$' ,$_'. o ,q~
~ -o°'~°~°E`~'°~ `~'' cca_'~°3 wio~+o~a. 'a~a ..m ..c
a, R E•~ ro w d a~av o o ro o ~~~• o.ci w °' ~ d m
~ ~U¢ ~,~~° a° E v~i ~ ~~ ~ ~ o ° ac a~i v ~ ~ ~ co ~~
o,'r~-.~y~'°'E'~,°'.°'o oocrn °EE~ ~~ ~_ ~°u.
~ U ~~;o,r..r.~~!~• wcuc~i~d~~c: ~°~ r_o .c
d;~oo'oo~jE.c~~c~a~~,Eavm~3 ~E c~,~~o
` c~ac'vo..~'~°'E~,ro~~,?%•~ ~m o • ~ o~'aoro
~. ~ C N d d~~ ~ ftf 7 f4 C~~ C Y~.Q C~ ~~ ~ G7 ~ G~
3~E~>.°~~~yooc~o~~a~E`9a ~o ~cEcoc
O ~ C N.7 a'O N 3~ U tn tC! O ~ ~` C G O y~ N'r ~ tN C~
m a ~
~y ~ Q ~ ~ro ~ a E ry ~ ~ ~ ~ d Cl ~ ~ "' O C ~ d ~ ~ ~~17 'G ~ ~o tEl
o.. y~ ro c i>~~ u~i ai ~~ c~ y~« y s t~i ~-~- ¢'n. -'c- U ~~ C) z
o.c «; ay•~ `~ °~.c y'TC y~~ ii d N~ ~ c=i
~ cma~ o.c d i~ EU'~ ~aci c~i~ ~° c1=-'~~a ~~ ~• ' J-
a c `
LL ~ ~
~ ~ a ~
I ~
~ ~ ~ CA .~.
C ~
C y R `n 'O V
.E a~~;=p
i- a~ om ~
n d
Q•y y o y
° 'Z c •E .c
c ~ y y '.U2
acn ya..s}
-113-
PC94-113
nl
r~
c
0
.
~
a.
E
Cg
~
~~
N y
N ~
~ y
.i'
C ro ~
'S ~
~'S - ~
~ G~
0
~
C V
4 U
C~
U~
~-
° C~ N
~ :z N N
L :z .-
w
o
~ ~
~~ ~. o~ .
~ -
~ c
~~E
~~ c
3~
~ ~ ~
~rn`~. ~
~~o~ U a
a~
: c d
~w^ «. c
~tu ~ a~
an
7 ~ 1
O. 01 V ~ C
~
tp
N~
,a
- C N
0. p ~ ~,, ~- .a~ N
ro
d (d 'O O d N O=
U
p a ~ > N
.
f
a
N ~ ;c ~ i~ vi N E y ~C O ~ ~U ~ ~
dC
n
~ ~ ~
d
~ C~ , ^>
.
~ ~ ~U i O ~
~ in
q
i E~ N d d A
~ ~
N
y O M d
V
~ a > c
D N a ~ ~~.~c ~~c+ y c
~ U ~ d
d '
~
~
7 U "'
O
O
[0 L O ~ ~ C ~ '
?` O ~ ,C ~ ~
C 'i~ ~ G~ t:'
~ v~ O
~ ~ ~ p C ~ N c ~r ~
C~ N tV v~i i0 N
~ ' ~
~ U r• 'C C p'n ~ G
C~•
~~
'
R1 ~ ~~ ~. N Cl `1
= N'Q ~C1 U ~' N
'C T
t
~ U O
~ n. lL
~ ~
O' ~•Z
~ y C C y
y
~
C
~ T ~ ~ d a
N
'O v O
O
~
E N
„
, ~
0 cd
~>^ _ ~ d 2 1 ~ ~p
~ ~ w
~- N N ~~57
O
.q
~
•=' > N C~~. C~ ~' 0'
a.o ~,o d~5• E~
°c~ 3 ~ ro o,ati,
° ~ o x ~• v~,~v~, ~
~
,
n
a
N ~~'°'`-~
v,
~ ~ a> ~ E.~c'o
~ a~i-a~
~° '~'
~
G o~ E~, .
~ ~
--a
`~.W c, v'',.
d a~ o c
a`~
S °'~a~.
c~~i~~
Qmyoc~-a~• ~ °m•~
a3~ ~rnj
~roy y
roa_>> ~v,ET~«~
.c ~~ .c`°o-~ ~ .
.
'
~ ~ `' ~ CD .~ .% LL. r "
° '~
p y ~
~
~ y O
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. N ~ . N p O ~ ~ ~
°~ ~
~
` ~ ~ ~
'~ `
E o c
.
~ m
~'- ~.a ~ ~, m~ o ~
~ •. n 3
~ v>
'
E
~.~ ro a~ ~ ~ ~~_ o
O O ~ U ~.
ro
~ N L Y ~' 3 d L 11 0I .'C.. ~ .
~ N O ~ C C~ ~~~, t~ "U u1 ,p [L
C c ~'~ y d C C
lU cC • E~ Ql
C C ~~~
0~ d N N w ~~-' ~~
'O jX 'O q~
~
o~~
8
o-~0~.~3~~i
'a ,a m d ¢ c~ ~i~W
a~ '- ~oa
. o ~
im `Z`E.
`
o~ io ~ d a ~ N~,
E
~y~~~~~~~oca T:o~ ~~a ~dc 3~?~a
iap d
~
c~•y~..o~•N~`,Q',~.
E$''v E•x `~!-
~ ~' av,3
~'~ ' ~c~,~
y o~
e o,~~~~o.:9E
~'ro ~ ~'~•~ ~ ~ rnG >
x
°'y roa'~
~ y~°a~i aHiam ~`E a~da~~
C'zc`i.
.c0/.c
i~~.~o~
H-UF-tL v,d ot- a ::~r
H °~~i~
y ~ ~
°~~'~n°>'"w°' dE
y ao= N.n ~ -
a
~y
3~a.
a~
~ ~~N ~
vc~•~,own.
a
~'
• . . . d
3o ~~~ oni
~oc
c°rc
L
U .~
U
W LLJ ctf Q O~ ~
ro E iLL
O O O ~ ~ y
~ ~ ~ >
OC7
~U
c
.E c~•E c~•E ,
.
oN~E~
a
0
~ ~
N d ~
N d ~
Q~j ~ ~ ~
G7
O ~ O ~ Q N ~ ~ ~ ~
c ,_
o ij 0 n p~y ~ v c:
- ~
n. [Ll •- '
[L Q] •- C N 7 ~
~ ll.. ~~ CLl ~
-iia-
PC~J4-113
N
C
O
~
W
a
E
~
~~
0
~
0
~
0
d
~n
~{N
C
a.
~
~
o.• c ~ ~
~« T C ~ U 0~ ~ ~ p C .
~ ~
~, y C ~ d~
~
~. n °o,o-w ~~ c o. d ~ sn.c ~~ o ~~~ a' 4,~
€
W '
'
"'
~, o ~ o ~ 0 2
~
~
~ ~ v, ~' ~ ro
v E ro.c
~'`
° o~ ~w E ~v
~ ~d o>o a° a~`n d•
n m
u~
,
~
~,
~
d
~ ~.n c ~~ y. cu ~ cro ~U o• ~ c ~ d d
~a ~•
¢
`c
E~'yU E'
'
'o
~-W > c
~~
L
„
c
_
,= y
y
~ y
~~.
,
a. 3
o ~ ~ c~ ~~~ a~i ~ o~s E N~ E a~~'
~E tj~V o
°~
'
..n
~
.
~ ya~dro..o~-'c'roc`•=c E~'aa `~ c~~C
~~i ~ o..r-. o o p, in «o ~' E t° ~'y 'g N•~ ~ h Q~~' 'u~ a~ o c
'v'n~ > o p~E c~'i c~ o~c~i aC.~n c~~a~i ~~'c~ 5 a
~'3 a v~ o~aro ~ d o o°'~ .°. ~" d E`` E'~ °~°- c~~ d
`
'
~
~ ~'°>,n~
~yi°n°-o
a~~a~~
o'oc.-~. ~~.
~o~d~~
~
U
~
~
~
N
°' (~y
41 a' U~~ O.y%, . ~
4
7 ~ r
`~ fU
~ Q. C.C
~ ~
vEo~Ec"'p°
a~~~~Ep~~v~~~'
~-c`.~ro~r
~ .
t~7
~
~ d N O
t0 U N V F^ O'~
~
O. tan~
v
6~ p
a
"
N
.> L
Q
~ y
~ ~j
~
T\ O Q O y
~ C~• V~ O ~ N~ ~'
L
y N
aL
•
Q
. nj
id
N
y
~
~
O.
~
~
, w l
4 V w`¢ ~~ C]. « L~ y
~C'
~ ~. C d~ ~
~ O C N
y
~
U
iv ~ y.°-
'
°' ~G o~~ a~ ~~,c~iv~ ~~~ ,« y o o,a°
Vf Rf V C
7
~ C
V
N
U
'
Q
~ d
N~ C
« Y p.
'
~
,t~
, y cU Ol
~
V yEGi
v
.
~
p~~ ~~
U~=o~=QO~E
C~~nvd
= v_~ cv E
a~ "' ~ 0) d
N ~~\ N C d
j~~ L' ` ~ N ~.
~~
y
V
~'
?
`
C
>
N~ ro.G ~,~, a~-C fn C~ _• 'U U«~ O.C .O tq ~ ~ W~ O. N O. ~ r
~,~ ~~~a ~•~r y c•~ ~ a` ` u.L o a3 a~ o,~ o~~ rn
= oi o v~ U v~i 3~ o:° o. E° a~ 3 ~ E o~~' !~ v, ~~~`~'•.
.a
rn
c
.
~
~
-115-
PC94-113
~i
~~
4
~
~.
E
~
~
~ c
~o
~ ~ z
o ~~
a : c
o ~ 'v
y
~ y ~
~ .
C
~ 3r
~ - ~ I
a ~ ~,
a. o
~ E
~ .. N
°
a m .o
~~ d d'O L ~'~O C ..
`~
'
~
-~ co.c
~
~m t2'3~,'"O ~ >
Ua~~d ~
i d
~.u va
~'o c~oN ~o~~ c ~~
°'c~i`~ ~'
~aE ro-°c~v c~i°'cy~c...na~i°-~c~c dU~' ov~'i
.
n; 3~~'--•~°'€°
~'~y ~N~3~~~ro `yo~v~,~°-E°ma~Q' ~~w '~m
cm0~~°'rn~o~,a$'~a`-~'0~~'~?`~~'~~'~
°
~ ~ ~o~oc°.°1n~~n ~
,
yY~v,~a~y`¢» E~`~c~°E'~
r E~ ~ ~ y,d~~>,~
N~
>~ n
€~
~ c•.~'i o~ c E`v m ro c° y E c~ ~>,~~ E
o~p
°¢~'A
E
n
f°
~
om~
~
~
c
i
c~,a
.
•
o ~~
c~~E~o~ a
i
•
a
i
~j
~~
o~
c~' Q'~,~c;o~
ro?~~~ a;~~ai`~
~
,
a~ ~ ~v ~ Qi~ o~~
= ~
E~~~'Z oa-t°. L~ oN~,o fl',~ n.•~.~n c~
E
-'
V~
1 ~
dc ~
~d~' E'3o~oa°~
" N
S
~ ~..E~
E
ri~
oQ°b~d;;oa~~N;a°''o~~•c°'•~,c~w
N
r. ~ i
N'D ~
U
6.
7 _
'L7 a+ ~ vRi E C
C
~ U j ~ v7 > ~ d
~ .
~ y ry
C~~y ~
n
47 -. 7 C
> d~ ~ ~Q ,_ ~.~.' C.L.. ro~ ro'C U d N~ y
a
N
~ E ~~ tn O.
_~~ tJ7
b
c~~
~~°;a
~ ' f0 • d C U ~~q ~ N C O ~- N~ p 61
Q~c~d'~E~Ctn
~~~c~3~o~
.
y
.
~
,
`~ ~ ` o ~ ~ a2 ~ ~ ~
~ E~ rno ~ c a~ rna ~'~ ~~ L~» ~`~.~
°-c ~ a~ E o~a~i ro y a
~
~
' ~~v~i~w ~ E~.°'c ,~°~ ro N N~~~ o o~¢v
~
~
~a
i ~
v, y c o ~ a
~ c ~ Q. `n 3 > o- d ' €
~ p °C y
o ~
`~ ~ ° a ~
~ ~
y ~ w d o N ~ `~ ~
~ ,
m N `
~
caa ~ ~ ~ ro ° ~= ~
o '~ ~ '~
~a~
~
~`
n
>.
+f
C
~ C G~ Q) ~~ C'd C'C7 ~ C , .
c
y
u
.
a
~
~ t n. " p.D y¢ y~~¢ Q C3 V N C~C N
c~vmo~U~~c~Erow
O
~ ~o-~°~o...~nc`~~n-ron,c°'i~=~3~~c~
~
~
.
C :
~ O « y U T'Q in •V ~
N
C
~
~+
N
~+ Gi p
j ~ U a O E N
~ ~ ~U ~ ~ ~ T ~ p ~ ~
~ C
N
~~~
~ 0 C~
F
~
i .a a
N a
Q
.O
d
~~ o~ c U
~ ~
U
O
W O.G ,jj V
U
o ao ~~ o aL E B
~°'
o
~~' ~m
U
a
.,
o E y c o m,z.
`b'
aw v~
aa=~ n
; ~v~
~'
$ .
~•o
~a~
.. a
i
.'
~~ o~ E rnE~n ~~ v, ° n.~.n o.E 3 ~~
.
.
.
o
.
m cn c~'a L~--. ~ a
t .. ~ d .c a
F- o '~ F- cv ai
~
~ ~
O p
~ Q. ~) .N..
~q C ~
O ~ Z7 y
~ C ~
~ ~ ^ U
•E
= O y
. N E
a'~ o ~'~
i
Q
p~ ~
>
d
~ ~ C ~ t
~. - tV ~ U
O ~ N • = L
a 11.. '!~ CD ~ ~
-11G-
PC94-113
~
ti
4
U
U
~
c~'
t
7
y
41
~
.~
t
~I
r.
U
.
~
~ ~u,
F
~
Q
CJ
~ U
~ U
~ ~p
U
't^
~ ~ 7 ~..
.t
-'
C y
[L N
LL "'
W
~
~
.~.
N C
~
4C1 C • C
y h
..~. C ~ t ~ ~ ,>
W ~ ~
~
'
` ~ y
~
Q ~ 0
~
,~
C .
p
Q V .
Q V . ~
(] 'C
~ N ~
~ ~ d
~ d ~
a ~
U
w U
.~
~
w .C ~~
~
~ ~ ~w
v
° ~ °'
~
~
~~
~ ai ~ $ .c c
~
~~ cc
' 3~
'~ °
c °' 'g
i~ o a~ vi ~
'
wc ~
~ o a
i
~ >°'
a~iv ~r.
c
.
~ ~'`°o "c N~ m~
c
:c
i~ '~~inE'~i
~
d
i.
~~ y""'„ ~
~ ,
o c
~'D V~.O G~
f0 .c c
o .c
o,
U O ~ t~ C ~, v
°
'
~
~ ~
N Cl a v~i
d
'
E` o,~
~ o~ a 2 m
~~ ~a:
a~c c= a i ~ ~ ~~ o
c,
~
ai a
'> c o v, ~ E o c ~
°'
~' ~ mN ~
~ _
~
~
v~ ` Ta~ •~~
p ~'~? ,
o
To 0 7 ~.g` ~C ° - ° c
~
ar~ ~ a
a~dv~o
.o ~
N ~ .
3
s>, ro•~ o c
c~
v~ o ~ ro°p N`,~° ~ y ~ `.c4 m
~ I- •c o~
~
~
rn-~
sc°~~~~% y u
.c
ti~c~ic~o~ d v y»' ~~ o a~ a ~a s
" ya d
Ev~~
y
` o~ 3
d E
~
w°'
~W ~~ c
c~~ U~ O~ c
~s
c~ Tc o.o o ~ E c ~
t~
' d
u
C Tyg 4,
y~ 7 C RS
0' LJ ~~ ,r,
~ p
C iC v1
~~ c9 ~ W~ 0 C d ~ C
~~
c~v~n
ro
E « ~ ~..
~~ ~ y
co
c
C~ °~Eya~
0' ~ C N'~ ~
E~¢~•
.a N tp U O~O o
w
Urn
d C C• N C~ U ~C IU 71
a•- •C E n. ~ vi
V tA C .
~
_
N ~~ Uf R
in t~
C C
N w ~ E y t y W f~0
'j ~
~ «
E ~ ~ '~61' g !_ .C '~1 y C ~ ~ j
~ °C V ~
~
y ~. ~. ~„ ~ a ...
,
ro N d' L[] « (Sy E'U T ~~ C y V C~
ro lQ
~ y ro u R
~ ~ O.. R1 'U O
~
~ C"%' U vl ro V' '"~}' U O
~ N N U V.C
.C '~O uj •~ t~~ G7 ~ O~
E
'C
'
U U7 ~ O' j 4
N N
S
c
U
.~ _
a~ ~
~ C L
q)
m ,~ .
U .. y
y
G
O O) O~.w ~ G
3. N.~ ~ ~
i
~ V a
°' ._ ro u~ c
~~ ~ v ~ .-. ro,^-
d~~ o'~ i c`~v c~i rn N o~ °~ o~~ ~p °
-a
a~ d~ c ~ c
~
m- ~--
~
a~i'3 ~" ~ a~
i ~ ro
v cu c o
d d y c d or~ ~ o.c a ro
~
tiE > a
~ v~•~ u
.c3.~E
ao N a>voi ~ ~~ ~ o
~ Q~o ~ o cy ~.
•~
~~ ~E~G ~n~
~_~ E o•c~3 ~ ~
~ E? ~~ ~a
°'' `° u" ~?
~a
N~ C N N y
`°
o 3 O m C~ N
`° ~~ c
o ~
~ 3 r N ~. ~~~ U~'U ~ O
o
m•
a
~'
m ao "
c 'S d C W V L O
r-
~'
'3 '
~ ~y N
o m
vi
E
~
N
p ip
' ~
~~
?+ -
• y
~ c
a
~
~
c0 0) N tn
F^ d
>. U.C , ~
Z
y
,.
y
~
ro
`°
o ~ N .`
y
y~~ ~ ~ N
y
~
~
o a
N° o ~
° ~ E y d N O
~ ~~ ~• 'C '-
°'
ab a~
t]. E
~ E c d~~
a~' ; o ° cn y
°
' `
-°
y
ro ~ o
d E•~ ~ v>. a~ a ~ '> .c d
°~'o
~ °' ~
a~ 3 o cU c ctl
~
U °'
n
p
~ y
L1 O in
. ro ~`~ d p= ~n ~y ~ N ~
~
a~ ~' ~ ro ~ ,
O~ v~ Q cC >. U~ N N 4~ Of N
~ ~> ~ m cu7~~o_~ a
$ ~~ d ia U'
p
n.~ ~~~~
~ O
a~n
.°'c~oa°1ia~''iaS.U-- o
.°'c~
G p
.caZia~ia°'i~~a
tn
tn a uJ r~s
-
F- in z~ C1 cv m • •• •
I- cu
f- v, i
«.
~ v
~ L
`~' >. ~'
¢
C
W p O cC c
~ O
W Q ~
O
°O~~'c
' `~~ a°,om•~ o
a~
~
• ~~-'
_v~
~, a,= ~
E ~a
m ~ ..~
~. :~ ~
E
ro
~ ~
~p ~,
a~ N~ n'
c ~f ~s
Q._
v~i ~~ w ~`
y d
y
N~ C(C ~ ~ C N a. ~ C C E
~ p~ ~ lL O~ Q c0 O c1 m~ U O O
~:o m,c c
o.
u~o N
o~ o v~o ro'~
. >>t o N
c
. ~
~
am Ewrv ,
ci m ~,
a`mmU~n i~
-117-
PCJ4-113
NI
-118-
PC94-113
~
0
. .S- --- - ~ -
~
~
E
0
U
c~
c
d .__.__ .r
c ~ _
i~
.`
~~
V
rtp o
'r n'
r o
~
V
o
U
r 4~'..
'
~ ` Q
~ G~
d
W i
c
ic i
a ~
c~ o
o C] p
~ d n, G~ f~ Q
T~' n. p
~ n. Y p ~
d cL o
~
d
c~~
c~
d~i ~,
,
.
c~~ c'y
~
~'i ~«c
V E E ~..~
V E E E~
~E ~~
~o
~ ?
V E
~
~ o,roo a~~au vo~ ~
o>roo~
~ ~-°~c~ ro~caUi ~ca~i ro~~ ~r `v~
Oowcn O~]wv, i,:ui~n Jowcn~t
~ p ~
- t~
A u
~ Q tn ~i ~~ ~ tyo N
~ T ~ ry~ c~'D
N~ 0
c ,
r. .Q~ ~
~~7 C p~ O - o ~ ~ Qi ~' ::
~s a Y N ~ G C~ lD N lC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ Gi
~ ~ a
~~ c.a ~ i0 U
~r'' u. ~' t 7~ ~ r b ~ T •
~
.~`;.' E`n o? 1= °`~~~ ~~' v d
i° O Ul ~ ~ ~ .~.N
~ u'~ R c°'i~ •
( E~F
~ ~ ~ ~,~
~
i: ~NN~pm~o ~ax
o~'•,
n
n °n ~
ro ~. m ~ d .. ~ ~ 3 ,
~
~~~r r~
~
~ t`~
~'
CO ~`fV ~
d. N
vf- ~
0~ C
3 ~
+
a
N 2 tn .. U~ ~' C 0~' ~ X l6 U
~
~
'
~ ~
`
p y- ~ ro N
`
~
~
u
d~aj C~
A~g cn~.
Z r ~
~ ~i$ o~
a
~icv rodui>
~
~
~0 'a ~j
~ ;4
~~~
3
~
~~~ ua~q
~~~° ,
.~
~
^n=cn ~ dw ~'rv~
a`c
~3 Ycc~~~~ s .
7.~
aa~~cdS
g
"~ ~
o"'
~ ada,o
(
.`~t ~c •,~
E ~~L~ .ri~
E c~ ~, -- ~ 'S ~ ;g
nr c
¢ $ x c rs u ro~.c`~ ~ a~
L a~
,
~ ~ ro ~~
v~3
°
3
~ N 0~- 0 ~ L ~
i t~
O. %' 'C ~~ d C O i0 t'1 m~~~ t~
np~
O D vr O
~
~ g~~~
E M
N~o~
3
O ~~d ~bN -~oa~: •~ 3 ~
~
~~~
?
m ~~~ ~5~~
~~ ~~, '
u.D 0r
Y C ~ [ ~
~ F-
N
•. ~ ~~ ~
c! ~'~ s ~y
U O
~ ~y E O
t9
G U ~ tn y Z ~ ~j, ~ v ~ vl C 7 ~ ~
° P_
41 C ~ ~ „~i ~ O
, p~ Q
j
~
O
i ~ ~J
L y• "~~ C! yr 0~ O.x 4 Q~ ~~ r
U ~
~~
~
=
f L a.~ ~ D N N~
u
~
~
~
V
rJ v
d ~ ~ ' ~~ C N
v
w O.
C~
V 44 cp h t7
~
~ V
~{
~ n ;
o `
~ c
~
~ ~ ~ J
~'' ~
~'
i~
'" ~
a ° ~
r ~
.~ o y ar
~ ~ v
p
~ ~ cx
.
~ .
.R 3
~ ~
~c~ u~ ~~"~~~~ ~ ~
~
~
°
a ~
w ~
~r!~ ~~~ ro~r
~
~~~~1
~Iy
` ~ N C n ~u.~ci
O~~~ o.v
C.e:~~~ ~'
~ic
,
~~e
i~ C~~ v t p~ N ~ O Q~ O cg ~~
~~.~
N P~t ~.
O~ A
~N
$ tn d O n
.
.~t~o~y ~, ••_ .y~ y"
~
o`` v y !? ~ , ~ y •~ ~ N .~ "y '~ ~,v ~i
~~
~ ~~'
~~~~~ ~ p
r
d ~" a u ar ~ ~
d~~ ~'~ ~
~ ~t ti
~ .D
~ ~
o
Ci I~ S~ i"
ap •1` ~~
~
~
~ G~ .. y~ b Ll `p 1'i ~L~~. ~
`~~y p V r~ ~ ~ y~i~~ O ~j~ ~? ~•~ .r`~ ~
~ ~'r,'~'~"ry ~ ~
~
- ~~~1
~
~ .~ n~','r ~i~ ~ ~7 cZi ~~ ~' ~ ~~ ~ o a`~~,
~ m~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
~
~
~
a~,
n c O p„ r, :a C ~ r a'- :~C 3~
4. r, c~ 2 tn :~ tT tn r7
v..
«:
~
N U
~
~
~ w ' rf fr
h
LL ~ E ~
~ ~ d`
u
o~ ~
c`5
~ ~
$~a ~
~n~
~ ' ~,
i p r
'~ .~ ~' .
~i q c~
•. F 3 a
9~~ v
~
~n ~
.
~ ~
C ~
~, ~ ~ ~ N ~7
(' r ` C) C~ .~
w
^ U
~ t~•, ~' ~ ~ ~ C
L ,
'
I'1 i"
~ ~
' S 0. C) r ii.
~
~ C U' ~ V
.
'
~
~ C
`~
~ S ~ t`~~j , h "~ O(n
A ~ W
`'
'
~
~3 ~
(~~
G i't . `
~ .
Q •~ .~ E y
5t '
C
~
`~ ~ ~ ~
`L
V '
t C~
~ C
~O c L) C 7
~ ~ ~ ~
~ F C O J
I
l. ~a
~,.-__•.s.rY-_~•r ~~ o~ ~J
~..-_-~_+=-.~. O a~~CJ-,
_LL.L._._"c_:_'._...±Y~,_"`:~:'_'..!_._~_-"___ _12~~f. at~ n~ o ~a tc
._ =l:T -
- D 7 ~~ _ Pc:il-t -1 1 ~
~
w
e
~
2
:
i:
c
v
~
a
F
:
c
0
.~
a
~
C~
~ ~
N ~ ~ c
'c ~ p
~
;~ Cc0 p
O ~ a~
~ ~ C Z
c ~Q
~ ~ p
O
~ C
~ p ~
~ ~
N
~ ~~ia
c~ .-
~ N a~
i~
r~
~
~ q c y C~O .
OaW
C ~~ G C
~ O O Ql Of
'C ' C1 'CQ' U
~G ~
a t~ ~' ~~ ~ G
a A i~ O
~`v :~ d
Oowu~ aa anoc
I - d ~ d
N ~~ r. ~. ~ ai c° ~ ~'
~ N ~.. (71 ~ V C .~ ~ v Cl
~'. «~ ~ ~~ c ~~~ y °~i v E n
j~pa~v ~ °'~.!9 0 ' `~~ u ~`xa~i~ ~ rYAO.
~v
p~~~.. .~ ~~~N kv,~~W .~dct 20~ ~
c~ ~NNs ~' a~ V ~'~ ;C T~ C~c. t y p'g 'v~i ~'y Q~
q d~?~ G~! ~~,07 ~ n ~ R7 N~~'$~ ~ r~ Ry p p1 ~ C Cl N
.~o~u,3cr.r y~=~ ~~p~rn~i3 °'~°cN~ ~:~~~~~
~ \ ly C 1_ j.V ~ U C C~~ ~~ y.~ ~ ~11 V y~j C:~ v
y~l ~q~~ d J b y ~ ~n RV1 ~ V~ U t= 'C CJ ri ~ C
.Ov~ C]. ~~ Cy•S O~ G«~~ ~~ a V~ CQ C.~d- ~n C1 Ep ~ C W 61
n1 ~ in t o~ V 3.'-' g ~ N T~6 ~ 3 C O o ~ '~ y a ~i
c d 3 c~ `J t~ 2 uf ~~ ~ ca o ._' '° a, c,~j o~~ y ~ N b n~~
~J ' p «1• 7 C y cCt7 iv V E~'^ ~`' ~.a C ~~~ .` ~ _ N O ~ O~ ~
p . 1- ~ py
~ C .Q ~ O A ~A C W N ~ ~ `a .~ C ~ ~ 1= ~ '~ ~ ~ t ~ CTI ~ E
g ni~~$~~E N~R~-~' ~~~-wN-u E°'"y ro°'~zOfi~
W ~ N N Q~ ._
~.. ~aQ w~--?rc rotcc ;?~Nr> ~'~9,~a,°~ a~
~ o~$, ~~.~•~ Q~~ ~c ~'.~~N ry N„~y ar~ o:~.. 3 3vd w
~ V.r_ V O U ° Z~~ c 0~ r C tl ~- Y"~ O Y V
o `c ~ ~ a .° c ar ~" 7 ~ ~o .~ .c .~ 4, ~ .~ C
v ~ ~N~ a d r` t 7 c~ ~.~. ~ W~ i7~~ a.» ~ ~ ~9 O
m C .~ ~ ~ C W ~ E ~ .c ~., ~ ~ v~i c N V '~' n ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ t ~
.Q~, ~~.~tc~ U-°,~~,~ ''~, ~C "~~o,.~ F°~ti~M
~ ~5~ ~.z ~ _ ~ ~~ g,Y ~a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~, ~, ro.a.~ ~ 3
~~.~~~nO O$,-~.=~~ S.~Lq ~j cy'~i. ~i-. ~O,~.r
,~ ~ tn ~. c~ .~ ~ ~• a F„ ro ~ ~1 O c~i c~ ~ ~i.g 7 ~ g ~• ~
4 d~~! ~ ~ Q ~~ G G l) Cj ~ V .~ d. t1 r~ C:t ~' vl Vi ~~ L t~
~.N c Mc~~ ~ ~ o~ ~i`n•4 oc ~•~ ~~ 3'~ ? ~+ y ~ `3 ~.4~
~,.~$ ~,mn d ~ ~ L " ~3 0 0 ~p
L C N G~ d'~ O ~~~ vVi ~7 ~ ~ C~ ~ T~ ~~.~ _. C ~~ N~~I.r
~`~.c~ Y d`~, N~ ro~ ~'~.c`~~~`~ `r a.'~2~~ r~~ ~.~n~~,~{
~ Z7 a t N V~ ~ ~ ~ i3 .gi - _..__.
~ r_ ~
~ I tu W
d ~
~ a
F~ ~y
3 ~~
~
r ~ ~,
G ~
~p C
~ C
tp C ;~ 7
v ~ s
, ~a na
~ :Y .~.
~ t~.~ ~
r C
O N
~
O ~ .4 rS ~ },
Gi~ am aw
-:~11-
~-~'~I.t -1 I S
n
N
~
a
~I
1
~
C
O
.~
~.
~
3
~'
0
~
~
L
U .
~
N
~ ~
n
O ~ C O
~
N lE
y
~ 0 q~ .~
~ C 0 0
p p1 pl U ~ ~U1
a C ~ Q •~ •~
cr Ac~o '' ~~
n. u`. ti a ~.
.L ~ 61 L t ~ ~
U v~ U O t~ ~ N
m
ro °= a~.~ o t
~,
- ~
°1 v, E ..
~:. r ~ c~
3 t p ~ c~ ~• o c~-~ ~ o• E d ai
v 6/yvd~i~y~'dv~
m~S ~ (/~ C
~ E~
N ~.~~oj'~y
'~J V1
~ 7 ~ ~ .. ~ O ~ tt7 ~ ~ O
N O t ar ~ 'D ~ ~ ~ In ~ .•
,
~ p~, ~O ~ d 3i Q. '0 ~ y Y Y. C p3j N
N p ~
U d~ N C 3
m ~~~;~E ~ o,~~ °~o'~
~:~ W
~ a ~'•~~'i c
~~~ ~ 7 ~ d ~ C Cl N C
Q
~
O
C ~' V
'~ C ~ y L Ql L~
~r
~
~
'Q O~ t
~~'
t0 O 7 Ury L V
, ~ C d N
i
j ~j O
~(
~
~0
f0 G+ ..~'• v'D y A N.G 'N ~~ U L
`
~
'~ :
~ u CJ
C ..
~ C 6~ vi .
'
? '~
~ '~
~ n ~ ~ c
V ~ D ~ ~
~
ao i,n~~ d
na~ .~
c~
t
`~ ' N
V ~
C
"c°'o
a'
~
~ ~p ma
O
N
~ U
U
~ G~ di r N
~ ,
•- T~ ,
,n
..• ~~ y d
d C
~
•
cp
ry
~y
,F
L d y (1 L]. c7 ~ ~l ~ L ~ . . ~
G r' ~ ~ 'p
N
U ~.. ~ R1 Q1
~ r
~'J
~
~
L
S
r-
~O
'Q 7
N~ Wvvv~~~~~~.~ ~ V~ GN ~ N fC ~
v
N
O~
-
'p
~'
Vl •.
~- CJ1 y/~/1 ~ y y M
~
~~• ~ O ~ O~ N ro O V t T ry d~
~ ~
O~~ ~ Y. .C .L V
~ ~q ~ C1 O~p r 6~
.
.
7 ,
d
~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~p C 6~i ~~~j,T
=
O
'O ~ Vr
ti C yTj Gr ` 'O L C
CSI G i) `C E`~
~ L' '~ ~~ c" 9 ~~ C
W~
~
~
~
N
' 1y
•~. a, A y
`'~ N C r L~~ ~ Q1 tL
E 1]
~~
F
I ~~ t6 ~6
:
v
i ~ 3
~
C~
~ C ~j ~ .
d H V
°~^3
~~~'~~~~~°'.c''U'
~
' ~.~ro
c s.aEi~u~m~~i
'~
~ "' vf y ,~j ••
~ C
'S E ro~'E ~
c c n'c+~33
9; o~ ,
L'
~~K i~f ~ tC C71 N ~ G
~
~i.u, ~ a`~ a'~
~
~
s.~1 v ~~ ~ "~E ~ ` a~i ~ ~y
~+~ ~
~, ~
'
~.ti ~ ~~
a ~:~ ~ K ~ y ?
~
,
~
ry E
u ~,
.C G ~ .~_ ~ N rvy~ ~1 `
~. C tC G~ C11 ~~ 6~ ~~ O `Y
N
~
6r !~ ~
.C Yl Q
'O
6~ .i:
L ~ t. 6! W C
C ~71 C~ CI t W
a. .+
h' _ N t0 _
V/ V1 CS v~ L1 N
/- IU T~ N .
u ~
Q o
v
~ t~ .:
4 ~ w
~ ~ .
~
N , r
C' G ~ ~~ C1
~ ~ ~
•~ '~ ~ ~~ C ~ ~ M E
i= '° ~• V c' ~ C
'~ ~ a
w
~i ~ln ~
Or C ~ ~
O ~
I~ Q ~ ~ ~ t'1
~ ~ •~ I
~
a lL. C
C r, ' 1'S fA G. QI
-121-
1'c:9•1-1 l 3
m
N
2
w
c
~
4
~
V
~
O
~
2
~
f~
~
C
Q
~
N
ti.
Ep
U
c
0
~ .~
C~ L ~ Z
C d C ~
C
N n. lC ~
C O p`. C
G > C C
y ~ N 0.
O d ~ y
'S E ~ E
U ~ryry U t~=p
7 ~ ~ ~
aov.~[~
~
C
.~
C
O
~'~
O
~
3a
c
~
~
C~ Vf it~ t N
C 6V1 ~ iC U'C V ~ ~ .~
~t 't G~j t~ lp U
C ~~ ~
d O ~ y~ i0 $j ~ Ul ` N 'U_p 41 6~
~ u ~~ ~= e c~~ c` ~ d o~ ~ c~
~'~ ~~, ~~y~b~ ~N~g ,~~,~
~~ !1. C7~ V L p O ~
.~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ Y ~ ` « ~ _ ~ ~ ~ O , ~ ^
~ Ol C _ U~ iV ~ C 1p d ~J
6> > G~i ~, ~~~ y C~' Vy C'~ ~ .l~ Gi y c7
~ y ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~' 0 ~ ~ .O ~ y ~ a w V1 ._.
~ ~ G~ ~Q C tU C ~ ~ ~ d .. = t T~ 'G T ~~p
r
.C O t~+ Ortf~~ U O~•~ ~ t~/1 ~ U$ b
w a~ ~ d~ C~ ~~ O a ~ N~ ~o ~ v~i ~ c~i n
~ h~ a~ ~ N~~~ O n~ '~ ~~ y N G O tU vyr
_ C y .Q c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ «!'. ~ 1)
c~i ~' H ~iQa-~c .cs ac g~i~
y ~~ d~c,~~mo~o m~°rn~d~~~~=
~
~ x ~v'Z.cEc
N p~ 7~ E~~ ~~~~Ii o~~~ ~ c~'~ `~ c~.
~ a ,~ i' v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' G' ~
U ai~~i C aro.~l~~ ~' ~°i o `° a~ rnc~ ~~ro ~ a
~~.~C ~~'-' C ~t~ 2 ~~ ~CJ~~ •C ~O~ ry~ ~
d
N ~ o E ~'E ~~~ b~~'i ~ F n ~~o ~~ ~ r
6~ $ N~ ~ N~" y R ~ O~
w~~'8.~ d~,:n>` c3c'L4 ~.~ENtich--
Qi..d~.. t'i~~ 3 i,~ro' ~as ~~ Es.
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ F p ` ~' ~_ ~ E ~~
~
cr o~ y~~ e r d~ ~~~ ~r ?`~,n ~~c ~o
~~'i.s.__ --o3coroa~v~n~<nv~~dv,u$
~ ~,~~.s
~ r. w u ~ ~,; v
U--ume~
i:
c~
~
W
O
~ C
aa
O ~
O ~`
a` `~
-1~2-
PC94-113
~i
~
W
ry,
a
,V
6~
~
e
0
H
d
~
N
r
ro
~
c
u
:~
~.
E
C~
I c c
~ ~Ifl 4
.t' ' C' ~ ~ ~ (D
f
.71
~' a ro
N
~ ~
c o a .~
~d E
~
° ~
uj a>i o ro
C(p
~
~ y Q •y ~
~~o~ ~
~
~ ~ E y E ~'c
~
U ~ U ~ C .~
~ 7 ~a~i w~
n. Ll v1 O a~
---
c
O~ y «% ' U ~ R1 L'
y c~, ~~y ~ c abi `' i~ c`v 5 G. a~
O ~~ U~ ~ N d ~7 d ..~-.
« '~ ~ ~ ~ C V ~C ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ C
rn o'~ o~y rn~ ~ ~ o ~~ o y°' ~ iI+ ~ r
d y ~N DC7 ~Q ~ N t,_
~~ ~ ~ O 7 U~'C y p) ~p J N y~ " d G G) ~ ~
C U O L
~.~ ~o >y°po ~° v~$ti occ ~a.~?~
`.~ d .~ a "' ~ ° ~Y c
?~ c~ ~ ~ ~ o, ~ p~ ~ ~ Y ~i :y .~ .c. o c ni
~ c aro~ i~..=°. c~i o ~~ ~' ~ c Z $.ao °' E~
wa' ypc'o~.o~aS 'od -=.~T~ 'v~`oN N°'~
roo ~n.aoc~Ed ~.~4 ~ .3~ .,~u~+ ~v
c
f0 d C ~~ O a N N N ~ N C C>' O~ C
d n~ ~~~~ c •: a~' S'°.~c~. ~ y c~.v E~~
> >~ a::c~'> ; °a ~v,o~,~`°c~:.~ d ~rod
~,, ~ ~~_ g~,~,, L.~
`~° ~°~' ° °~'v~o~b .~,`v ~~6'%T~~ ~' `°~~
~ `~ ,~ a ~ ~ C ~ ~ r ~, ~ .. c ti y. •,~. ~ '^ o
~~ i~~~~~ma ~~ ~~.,`~C'~°2~E cN a~~ ~
°'i ~' n.c cti °vi o 61 0 :o °'~~n_ ~ o.y ~
° m ~ n.E.N'~ o~ c°~~ ?.~~-~' L° ~ c c'v~,.`~ri v~•o
~°'r E.c ~ c C ~ , ~" ~
d V yy>.~~~ ~'o ~dRi'c~~~.~' w~7 ~wa
~ ;~ u .p~'~ t N CN ~ ~ ~ ~ 'U 'o ~ ~. G. p ~ '" '~ N .~. ~Q~ «
~.c~,~~i~' ~ ~ ~ Z5 3 ~~.$ '8..-~ c~ o~~ ° E ~ ° °
~.'
E w ~ ~~'~ $ g~ ~ 3 ~~''~~.~ ~ ~c ~ ~ ~~ c
Y~• ~NO~d 1°..E~~~oy~~`E~N'My ~'~~i
N~~ ~ O`~ U~. O~~~ Q Y j~ C) ~C y C'y Cl IJ ~, O~ t~`C
'~ ~ _ ~, y U
a.g ~~ C 3 o C y V'g Q in C ~n O ~ '~ Y~ C7 C. 4
~~uroc~aGQ~aE~¢v~ s Wi~~o
•`° Z ~ ~:. v
t v c~ 1j c.i Z'7 W I- a~ C
~-ucaro -
L
A w
W ~
O
c ~ ` ~E
E °~ ~ ~ n
~"
a a .
Q,
°
o ~'
~ c~
O
~
I ~
`
~ ~
am
n
.c
7
! _ _.
_ _
-I23-
PC94-lia