Resolution-PC 94-26. ... . .... •..W..W.
.. . ..,..,....~.. ... - M. ~~
,~, -~, atwra
RE.SQ! UTION N0. PC94,Z~
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS510N
APPROVING MODIFICATION 7U
CQNDITIONA~_ USE P~FtMIT NO. 3'S~J
Wt I~REAS, on Decomber 3, t~0 the Planning Commission epprovad Cnnditionai Use Pormk
No. 3359, In part, under Resolution No. PCJO-271 permfriing the expanslon of ~i ~ecycling/resource recoveiy
transfer fac!lity wrih waiver o( minfmum number of parking s~ces, mnxfmum fence liolght, and requlrod
improvement of parking areas on property loceted at 2751-2781 East White Star Avenue (Anaheim Disposalj;
and
WHEREAS, the petftioner requests modi(ication of sub~ect use permit t~ enclose the outdoor
usos of tfie existing recycting/reseurce recovery trans(er i~cllity by the constructfon of 76,592 sq.ft. and
29,510 sq.ft. buildings with waiver minimum numbor ot parking spaces; and
WHtREAS, the City Planning Commission did hoid a pubiic tiearing at the Clvla Center in
the Cfry of Anaheim on Februar~ 23, 1994, at 1:30 p.m., notica of seid public lie~ring having been duly
given as required by law and in accoruance wfth the provisions of thd Anahoim Munlcipal Gode, Ch~pter
18.03, to hear and cons(der evidence (or and against sald proposed mafiflcatiun to Condftional Use Permit
~lo. 3359 anci to investigate and mako (incings and recommendations In connection tlierewith; end
WHEP.EAS, aaid Commicslon, aNer due inspectio,~, irnrectigation and study made b; ~~s~if
nnd in its b~half, er~d aRer due conskleratiun o( ell evidonce and reports affered at said hearing, does tind
and determfno the faliowing facts:
1. 7hat the petftloner requests appro~~al of revlsed ptans to encto~e c~cist~nq outdonr uses oi
an existing recyclin{~/resource recovery transfer laciliry by iho constniction oi two 7(f,592 sq.ft. and 29,5t0
sq.ft. buildings under nuthority o1 Code Sectfon 18.61.050.375 ancf wlth Wafver'A" befng rovfsed as idlows:
(A) .~ions 18.Q~.05U.Q~. - Minlmum number oj~r I~i gg.
,ZQ 06Q.48Q (~Q roquired by Code:
end 18 81 O(i6.05a t 2~roquired by parkin~ study;
~,Q existinfl end proposed nn•site)
2. That the parkinp waF~er, a~ revisad, will n~t cause an increase In traHic rongoslion In the
immediato vicinity nor adversely aHect any ad~olning I~nd uses because a parking stixly, indiraiing that
thore will ba adoqunte parkinu for this I~cAity, was opprovcxl by !he City 7raMfc ancl Transpohation
A~anagor;
3. That the grantinp ot the parki~g variancs uncior the corxlitions imposed -vill not bo
detrlmental to the peaco, health, aafety or ganeral wellare ol the citizens o( tho Cfty of Anaheim;
4. Thnt tho proposed use, as rwised, is property aio for which a condki~nal uso permit is
auihortzed by Ihe Zohing Code:
5. That tha proposal uacs. es revised, wfll nat adveratdy atfact tne ndjoining land uses grni lhe
growth arK1 devc~{opment ot tho ercta in which i;18 propasAd to be Iocated berauae tho praposal Canalsts
01 encloafng uses which nro Currerrtly c~ccurrinp out-of4o~n arxl sa(c1 anr,tosure w11 rafuce any edverte
visual impa~ct.e end/or odor and dust emissions, erxf becau~e the ncsw buAdingo will malch exlatl-~ on•site
buiidings;
CR2023MS.wp -t • PC94-2K
B, That tho size And sh~po ot the site for tho pruposed use is adequate to ellow th~ tull
developmont ol tho proposed use fn a manner not detrimontal to the particular ~rea nor to the peace,
health, safety, and general welfare becaus9 the are~s befng enclosed are not currently usod or designpted
for parking;
7. That tho traffic generated by the proposed use will not Impose an undue burde~ upon tho
stroe!s and highwlys dosigned and improved to carry the trt(flc in the aroa;
8. That thc~ granting of the conditional usa pF,rmit under the conditlons, as revised, wlll not be
detrimentnl to the peaco, h~alth, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of AnahRim; and
9. 7hat ono porson ind(catad hEs presence at safd pu~lfc hepring fn oppooitlon; a~d that
corrospondonce was recoived In layor to the sub~oct petMlon.
Cai I Q~NIA ENVIRONMENTAL JUALI'fY 4r'f FINDING,: That tho Anaheim City Plannfnq
Comrnisalon ha3 reviewed the proposal to enciose certain exlsting canditionully permitted uses in
con~oction with an existing recycling/resource recovery transfer lacflity and revisfon of WaNer (A)
pertaining to minimum number of park(np spaces and does horeby tind that the Neg~tive Declaration
provt~usly approved In connection with Conci(ttonal Use Permit No. 3359 Ia Adequ~te t~ serve ~s the
required envlronmental documentation in connectfo~ wlth this request upon tin~ing that the declarati.
reilects the independent Judgement of the le3d agency arxl that it has considered the Nogative Declaratlon
toqether whh any commonts receNecl during the publfc revfew proces~ and further findEng on the basls
of the tnitial ~tudy arxJ any comments roceivod that there is no substantfal eviclonco that the projoct will
heve a slgni(icant eHect on tho environmcnt.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HESOLVED that the Anahelm Cfty Planning Commtssion does
heroby grant sub;ect modifkation to Conditional Usa F'ermft No. 3355, upon thu (ollawing revised (No. 1~)
and additional condftions (Nos. 19 through 25) which are herel.y found to bo s necessary prereg~ilsire to
the proposecl use ot tho sub(ect proporty Iti onler to presenie the safety and general welfare o} the Citixens
ot the City ~t Anaheim:
15. 7hat subj~c~ proparty shalf be developcd s~bstantfalty in accordance with ~lans ond sper,ificattons
submitted to the Cfry ot Anaheim by the petitiqner and whl~h plans ere on (ile with the Plannin~
Department marked Exhfbft Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. The nPw Exhibft No•.. 4, 5 and 6 shr~ll supersede
~xhibh Nos. 1, 2 a~d 3 os may pHttain to iho new Buflding Nos. 1 nrxi 2, if any inconsistencies aro
fdentHied.
1~J. That exterlor buildiny materiats far now B~ildinq No. 2 slk^.II maich those shown (or new Building No.
1(Exhibft No. 6). Pian;s submitted for building pen~"s shall so-frnlicato.
20. That no additidnal sig~age shaii be permittod on now 9uilding Nos. t or 2, oth~r than that as ahown
on Exhibit No. 6.
9:. 7hst tha pethioner aha.i nubmit en aflroement te the Sutxlivision Section of tho Publfc Worka
Departmgnt for revfuw ~ind appruval by thP Ciry Attomey, agr~e!ng that prior t~ requvating a
certi(ica:e ot occup.~ncy, Either (a) P~rcal Map No. 90•236 or (b) a Lot Une Adjustment Plat (shnw(ng
ttach entira buflding la wNht,~ (t~ ane parcel) ahall bn rec:ordod with the ONice of ttio Orango County
Recorder.
22. That prlor to grading plsn apnroval or ~xlor to lssuance ot a buftding permtt tor nwv Bupoing Nos.
t ancl/or 2, whichever occurs first, the ~ropeRy awnur slwl! submit a yVeier Ouality Menngernenc Plan
(WOMP~ spacNtcally idr:ntifying bost managoment practices that will be used on-she tu contrd
predicteMo pallutants Iram stormwoter runott. The WQMP shall be nubmitted to the Subdiv~sbn
Sectfan ot the PuMic Works Depnrtment for review and approval.
,2. PC94•26
23. That the tonnage of ~n•sit~ retuso shpll be Iimited to four thrnasand one hundrod sixty elght (4,168)
tons per day, per the st~to permit.
2a. That prior to issu~nce of e build(ng permit (or new Bullding Nos. 1 and/or 2, or witliin a period of
one (1) year (rom tl~o date of this resolutlon, whichever occurs itrst, Condition Nos. if1, 21 and'2,
above-mAntiondd, shAll be complied with. Extensions for further time to complete sald condltfons
may be gra~ted In accordance with Soctlon 18.03.090 AF the Anaheim Municipal Code,
25. That prior to iinal bullding and zoning inspect(ons for new Duliding PJos. 1 and/or 2, Condition No.
15, above-mentloned, shall I~o compiled with.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anahe(m Clty Planning Commission does hereby tind
and determino that adoption ci this Resolution ls expres~ly predicatod upon appllcanYs complianco with
each and all of the conditions hereinabovo set turtl~. shouid any such condition, or a~y part thareof, be
declarai Invalid or unonforceable by tfie ~lnal judgme~t of any court of compotent Jurisdfctior~, then this
Resolutton, and any approva~s herein contained, shall be d9emed null [~nd vi,id.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Flannfng Commission moeting of
February 23, 1994. ~~ /
~~~~;, ,- ,,
CHAIRMAN ANA' EIM CITY P NING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/-
/~ GRETARY, ANA ClTY PLANNING COMMISSION
(,
STA7E OF CAUFORNIA )
r,OUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Janet L J~nsen, Socrotary o( ttie Anahoim City Planning Comm(ssion, do horeby certHy
that the (oregoing resotution was passed and adonted at a meeting of the Anahe(m City Planning
Commtssion hsld on February 23, t994, by tho tollr~wfng vote of the mombers thereof:
AYES: COMM~SSIONERS: BOYDSTUN, CALDWEI.L, HENNING~R, MAYER, MESSE, PFRAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TAIT
IN WITNESS WH~FiEOF, I t~ave horew~to oet my ~-$nd thfs ,11,X-L day oi
`%~~~ 1994.
~ Za
8 RETARY, ANAHE~IT~LANNING l:OMMISSION
l1
.3. PC94-26