Resolution-PC 94-98,i,,z•<,
,B,F~QLUTId~J~l~f . PC94-98
~.c:,, .
A RESOLUTION OF TFIE A~AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PET'1710N FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERM{T N0. 3699 ~E GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commlasion did recelve a veriffed Petition for
Conditional Use Permit for certain real property situated in the Gity of Anahelm, County of Orange, State
of Celffornia, described as:
PARCEL 1, AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP N0, 89-'135, IN TH@ CITY OF
ANAHEIM, AS SHOWN ON A MAP HECORpED IN BOOK 246, PAGE(S) 1, 2, 3
OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ~AID
COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Cammis3lon did hold a pubNc hearing at the Civic Center
in the City of Anahelm on July 25, 1994 at 1:30 p.rii., notice of said public hearing having been duly given
as requfred by law and In accordance with the provisions of the Anahelm Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against safd proposed conditional use permit and to investiga4e and
make findings and recommendatlons in connRCtion therewith; and
WFIEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investfg,~lon and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and aft~r due consideration of all evidence and rsports o(fered at said hearing, doaa find
and deterrnine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditlonal use permlt Ia authorized by
Anahoim Municipal Codo Section 18.25.050.030 to permit an 8,355 sq.ft. chiarch including a Ic,ft seatin~,
a 6,900 sq.ft., 2-story, socla! hall with basement and a 30-foot high bell tower, with waivers of the following;
(A} Sactfon~ 18.04.030.22@ - , i~,i(~num structural helaht.
and 18.25.062..Q1Q ~@~t permitted; 50-fqot hiah domo topped
bYa cross of undetermined heght proppsed~,
(B) ,S~ctlon 18.25.063,010 - M(nimum frQnt vard setback.
(2596 j~0 to 105 feetl of lot depth required;
9°k to iF~ [35 to 7Q~yQ~ Proposed)
(C) Sectfons I8.04.p47..020 - Minimum ,sgtback of fn t tutianal uses ~S~JI acent
~d 18.25.Q¢~ to a rosidentlal ~one.
(15 feet requfred to RS-10,000 zonlnc~ to the south;
10 fe~ proposed)
(D) Soction 1a.25.063.Q.~,Q - ~ifnimum rearyard setback.
(25 feet to west property I(ne required;
10 feet to trash enclosure and 18 to 46 iQQt to
.~415~~ Proposed)
(E) $ections 18.OA.043,103 - P rm ~~ccessorv buildTfry,as_.
,18.25.064.020 1- " Yached,~ccessory ibuldina permitted In
.~pd 18.25.065.020 25-foot rear sett~ack;
2-StON dots~ched building proposed wfth 18-foot setback)
CR2152M$. W P -1- PC94-98
(F) ,~~i,~s 18.05.080 - Permittai sl~ny.
and 18.25.087.010 (onv i sq.lt. nameplatu slpn ponnitted,
one ~-squere (oot monument sign proposad; and
roo~-mounted siqns Ilpj permi;tod,
g~g rooi-mountod cross proposed)
(G) Sections 1A.04.060,O~Q • Re red oarktna lot Iandsca~Jr~,
and 1~.06.039Q44 (Required: one avoraao 48•sa.R. ol~er containina a minimum
15-aallo~y trae to se~rate~Qcon{ja~$.par~<i ~ s ces;
Propased: nonel
2. That waiver (A) is hereby approved on the basis that tPiere are apecial circumatances
~p~licable !o the property consisting ot ita aU!e whtch does not eppty to other ~dentlcally zoned propertiea
in ti~a vlcinfty t-~cause the proposed dome topped ~y a crosa wlil be located at loast 80 ta 100 leet from
the ctosest residential zoninq (to the noAh and south);
3. That waNer (B) Is hereby approved on the basis that sirlct applfcatfon of the Zoning Code
deprives the property of privNogea en~oyed by other propertle4 urxSer klnntM.~l zoninS clessHicatlon in the
vicinRy because nearby and adJacent properties have tr~nt setbacks similar to the proposed 35-toot
satb~ck from Wsst Stroet;
4. Tnat waNers (C), (~) And (E) are hereby approved on the basts that there are special
circumstance~ applicable to the praperty conslsting of fts location whl:.h does not apply to other Wentlcally
zoned properties tn the v~Mity because sub~s~:t waivers purtain to the northweat property line ol subject
propeRy whk:h abuts tho approximately 80-foot wide Carbon Creek floai Contrd Charn~el, arxl thet tho
actual aetbacks from the social hall and frash onclosure to propenfes on the other side d the channel wfll
iange from approxbrsately ~JO to 100 feet;
6. That waNer (F ' sby g-antecf on the besia tS~at thorcs are spec~ai circurt-atances
epF!IcaWe to the prupetty cons~s...~y .~t it sfze which doas not apply to othe~' identiCally zonec~ propertfeo
in the vicinRy beceuse the propoaecf sign wUl be locatecf on a 2Y~ acre parcel with a 222-foct fronQage
along Wcat Street and its aize and Irontage is siqrilicaMly large~ than existing IGs in the arrs~ ('/. acro or
smaller wRh 75-foot frontages) end, therefore, tho proposed monur»eM sign will heve s mfnimal visual
impact cn nearby residences;
6. That waiver (d) is hereby qrarded on tl-e besis thet thero are special ctrcumetances
applfca~le to ti-o p-opeRy conaletiny cf Hs size and shupe whlch do nM appty to other identically 2~ned
propanies In the vicinit~ bocauae tf~e par:cinp area wiU be lo~~ted moro Ihan 150 feat hom the atreat ard
tho proposed Iand~caplrro Nong 1Nest Street wAl be In excrss of 35 teet deep and, therr~ffore, the parking
lot is minirr-~Ily vfslble ftom Weat Slreei and wNl bs screened by the landscaped selback:
7. That s~rict applicatbn ot the Zoning Coclo deprhes the propenY ~ P~~'~'IoY~ bY
ather pro~rtles urxfer kterttical zoning dass+lication h ihe WcMity:
8. That tho proposad use is property cx-e Iw wfdCh g ccxxlNiw~al uat~ permit As sutho-lted by
!he Zoning c:ode:
9, 7-~at the propos~ed uae wiN rxx achrera~~ly Mtoct the adjankig I~~~d uRes and the growth and
~1evnlo~meM d the aree M vrhich q-~ propowA tr~ be Icx~tad;
.~. PCS)4•ed
10. That ~he size Fnd shape of the sfte for the pro{wsed use is 2uequate to allow the (ull
development of the proposeci use in a manner not dotrimorrtsl to the pertir,ulbr area nur to the pe~ce,
health, sa(ety, nnd goneral wellare;
11. That the tra(fic generated by the proposed use will not Impase an undue burden upon the
streets ~nd highways designed and improvod to cttrry the tra'.fic In the are~;
12. 7hat the granting o( the condiHonal uae permit under the conditions Imposed will not be
detrimc~ntal to the peace, health, safety and Qenurat welfar6 oi ihe citUens of the City af Anaheim; and
13. That four (4) poople in lavor and three (3) people In opposition indfcated their presence
at sAfd public hearinq; and that correspondence was received in opposition to t~ie subJect ry~tftion.
$~ALIFORNIA ENVIRI)NMENTAL ~UALITY ACT FINDING: That ~he Anaheim Cfty Plenning
Cnmmission lias rAViewod tha propoual to permit an 8,355 sq.it. church including a lott Reating, e 6,900
sq.it., 2-story, soclal i~all with basement and a 30-(oot hiph beil tower, whh waivers of maximum structural
h~lyht, mfnimum tront yard setback, mintmum setbeck of Institutlonal uses adJacent to a re~identiaf zone,
rntnimum rear yard sotbsick, permftted accessory buUdings, permitted sl~ns nrx! required parking lot
landscaping on an irregulariyshaped parcol ot land consistiny of approximat~ly 2.5 acres, having a
(rontage o( appro~imately 222 feet an tho west skle o( West Street, heving e maximum depth ~(
approximately 34~5 feet, being located epproxinwtely 5301eet south of the centerline of La {'alma rlvenua
and (urlher described es ~ NoRh West Street; aM does hereby app-ove thg Negative Declaration upon
finding that the declaration re0ects the indepeixlent ~udgeme~t of the iead agency arxi tlwt It has
considered the NegatMe Declaration together with any cornmonts received during the put~ic rRVlew
prncess ar,d further finding on the basls o( the inftfal study and any comments recefvod that thare is no
substantial evfdence that the project will have a signNicant eHect on the omfronmeM.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Pfanning Commisalon does
horeby grarri subJect Petillon lor CondKiona! Uae Petmft, upon the fdlowing conditions whkh Are hareby
lound to be a necessary prerequisNe to the proposed use of the sub~ect property in ordgr t~ presc3rve the
salety ~nd gonerel welfere d the Citizens d the Cky of Ar~ahe(m:
1. Tho devdo{~r shsll eithar (a) purchase Ihe City properry (which hs incorporated iMo tt» epprwed
site plan) hAm the Ci1y o1 Anah~im or (b) enter into a loaae agreement as approved by the City. Yhe
devetopet shall submit a purchasn cx I~se oNor, based on an appraisal, to 1he Fieal Pr~pei Secl~on
for ~evfew and epproval by Ihe ~iry Counc~. In Ihe event the sale or lease is not epprrnet :~e aft4
plan shall be revised to eliminxt~r the City•ownecf percel.
2. 7hat ~xlor to gradinq plan app~ovat, the developer ahall submR a water qualitY manaQement plan
(W~MP) specincany tdemHy~ng bes~ manayem~rn proc~~cos lhac wA~ be used on sNe to ccmtrd
prudictaWe pollNarna frum stamwater nuxNf. th¢ W~MP shall be submin«1 to the Put~lic Wo-Fcs
Depahment, Uevelopment 3ervices 6ivbbn, 1ur revfew ancl approval.
a, lhat a fee, in thc~ ~m~unt ol two hundred eiqhty five ddlars (t2Afi) per one thousand (t,000) sq.tt.
uf buacffng aresi, ~hall be pgid to Ihe Ciry M Anaheim tor aewer capacity mitfyaUon.
A. That sutqect propehy ~sha~l he developecf ~ubatantlolly in accordancg wNh plans anC specificatiaia
aulxnNteC to tho Cqy nf Anaheim by tt~ po1Nloner arK! ,~~hir,h plant are on Mo wilh IhA Planniog
pepcsrttnoM merk8d ExriiWl Nas. 1 tht0u~h e.
S. That prlor to isN~anca of a buidiny petm" crr wllhin e perkxt d one (~) Year from tha date d this
readutfon. whkhever occura Ikst, ~~~m Nan. t an0 ~. nl~ove•merMbned. st~all be compNod wNh.
ErtRnsbns la h~rthor tfm~ IG cQmplets sakl caxlRions m~y be p~dn~ed in occordarke wilh Soctlon
18.03.090 ot ~ho Mahelm Municipol Codo.
.~. PCfal•98
6. That prlor to ilnal building and zoning Inspections, Conditlon Nou. 4 arxl 13, horoin-mentioned, shell
bo com~l~ed with.
7. That approval of this application constitutes approval oi the pruposed requeai only to the extent that
it com~lias with the Anaheim Municipal Zonin{~ Coda and any other applicade Cfty, State and Fecler~~l
re~~letions. Approval does not fnclude any actlon or 8nd(ngs as to complience or approval ot the
request regaMing any other applicable o~dinanco, reQulation or requiremsnt.
8. That the church services shall be Iimited to one weelcday service (beyinning at 9:00 a.m.) and one
Sunday servtce (beginnfng at 10:0~ a.m.j. This condition shall not preclude special r~liqious services
on holy days.
9. Thet there ahell be no overlapping activfties In the church and social hall (whh the excAption o(
Suncley achc~ol actNitles).
10. That this condkional use permit does not Includs app~ovel of any school, child care tacfliry or
playgrouna.
1 t. That subjest church shall be allowed evening operatlons for commhtee meatings with a maximum
attendanr.e oi fHty (50) persons. The church shall be allowed a muximum af iffty two (52) evening
events that would acc~mmodate the total contiregation. The events shell end sa~1y enough so that
the parking lot is empty by 9:30 p.m.
12. That the stairway loc.ated on the north skie of the sociat hall shall be used tor emergency exit
purposes unly. The door shatl be kopt closed ~uring events.
t3. That tho property owner/devdoper shall Install n devic~ (f.e. vehicular access gato or fence) to
contrd vehiGes ente-Ing the site after hours.
1~1. That the bell tower mey be used at t2 noon and 6 o.m. soven days a wee8c, ~rxf for cali to 3ervice
on Sundeys.
15. That the dome and cross ahall not bo Nluminated.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEO that the Anaheim City Planninp Commission d~s hareby Nnd
and detenniiie thet adoptlon ot thi5 Aosdution is uxpreaay p-edicated upon aWpl~ent's compllence with
ea~h and all d the cnndltlons fwreir-sbove set forth. 5hould any such condltbn, or any part thereof, be
declared Irna1W nr uneMorceable by the final ~udpment of eny court M compotr~-t ~urladictfon, then this
Resdutfon, and any epprcwals hereln ccntafned, ~F~all be cleemed ~~ull and vokl.
'fHE FORECiOINCy R=80LUTION wan adopted at th6 Planninp Commisafan meetfng of
July 2~. 1994. ~~ 7
. " ~/.
i!
!r •'~~~~/ -
CHAIHMAN ANAHEfM CITY PLAN Ci CO MI8SIVN
ATf EST:
~~ ., ~.7'u~L:;o~i.r~
CFtETARY. ANAH~ CITY P4ANNING COMMISSION
/
.~. PC94•94
STATE OF CAUFORNIA )
COUN'fY OF pRANGE ) ss.
Ci i Y OF' A~lAHEIM )
I, Janet L Jensbn, Secretary of the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commfsalon, do horeby certiiy
that the foregoing resdutton was QassecJ and edopted at a meeting of tho Anaheim Clty Planning
Commissinn held on July 25, i994, by the idiowing vote of tne members thereo}:
AYES: COMMI5SIOIdERS: BOYl7STUN, CALDWELL, HEN~JiNGER, PERPZA, TAIT
NOES: CfJMMISSIONENS: MAYEF
ABSENT: GOMMISSIONERS: MESSE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havA hereunto set my hand thls ~~,, day of
~~G~yr~~i~~~_ 1994.
/ • ~ . ~.a~.
~ CRETARY, AhA~I CITY PWNNING CUMMISSION
~
,5. PC9~1•98