Resolution-PC 95-103~t'~~'
RE ~, TU I~ON N0. PC95.103
A RESdLUTION OF Thl~ A~IAHEIM CI'1'Y PIANNING COMMlSSION
R~C4iUMENDiNG THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APP~OVE AN ANI~NIJMENT '~O
S{~ECIFIC PLAN NO. 88-1 "SYCaMORG CANYON SFECIFlC PL,~N"
WHEREAS, thA Anaheim City Councfl approvecl Spoctfic Plan No. 88-1 (thc~ Sycamaro Canyor,
20 acres of
Sp~cHic Plan~ on FebrUary 9, 19H8, to provide for develapment of up to 1,119 residentlal units,
commercial usas, ar~d~3he e st and wAStlsides ofSer~ranQ Avenue at Wei~r Cany~an Road; and St sidos nf
C~nyon V(sta pr4vo a
WHERCAS, tho Specific Flan was subsoquently amonded in May 1989 to provi~le for 61
additional rosidentdal un(ts ~ar a maximum totttl of 1,180 residentlal dwelling unfts.
WHEA~A3, Development Area 5 of th~ aycamoro Canyc~n Specific P{an cansists c~f
appraximately 4.?_ acres of property located at tho northeast ~orner of Wo(r Canyon Road and Canyon Vist~
Urive; and that said property Es ~urrently d~slgnated for d~velopment ~s General Commc~rclal an Exhibit
~ 2"Specific Plan", Exhibit S 5"Specific Plan Exhibit A" ar-d Exhibit 23 "i'roduct Types" of tha 5pecific Plan
document.
~i'VHEREAS, tho petitionE)r proposos to redesfgnate Development Area 6 from Ger~eral
Commerclal ta Single Family Detached to allow devolc~pment of ~p to twenty four (24) single-family
detached dweiling units, thereby incrsasing the total numbar of permitted dwelling units in the S~eaific Plan
from 9,18A to '1,20~ units; and
1MHEREAS, the potitioner also proposas to amend ~ubsection .070 "Development Area 5" ~f
Section 18.71.Q60 "Develaprnent St~ndards" ~f tho Anahafm Municipal Code, to ~stablish standards similar
to those for nei~hboring Developmont Areas 4, 6 and 7(which standards arQ basetl on the RS-5U00[SC)
"Resir~entfai, SingiR-Family - Scenlc CorricJor Overlay" 7_one) with certain exceptions. All development
standards of the "RS-500(~(SC)" ~one (Ch~apter 18.27) sha41 apply tn Development Area ~ ex~opt as proposed
below:
'C~~E~b~MH~~1T STANDARD
Minfmum Bui!tiir~~ Slte and
Buildina ~ad Area
PpOP~SED DEVELAPMENT A,R~A ~
4,OQ0 sq.ft. lot and
~,0~0 sq.ft. buildfn~
Minimum L~t Width
Minimum L~t Width for Cuf~ie-sac and
Knuckle l.ots
Minimum Lot Frantage Width far Flag
L.ats
Maximum l.ot Covera9e and
(~inimum Open Space per Lot
45 feet
~~
3~ feet, m~asured at tfie required building
sotbacic Iin~
7_0 feet on accessway or easemant providing
access fo the flag lot _
a0~ Iat coveragA and
No additinnttl open spac~ requirgd for additianal
bedraom5 __
-1- PC95-103
CR2a66DM.WP
''`~t'.
,~.
;~; a v~
- ,.:,::..... ....._, . .____,,.,. -
:~::::;:._~~-
Minimum 5et~ack to "Front-on '' Garages
Minimum Parking Space pimensfons
Requirer,~ Site Screenin~
___.___.-.-~.-r
M~nimum Lot Dopth adjacAnt to Arterlal
Highways ____.r,,,_.
Minimum apen ~pace Are~ adJacent to
Arterial hlighways ~ _
18-foot long driveway betw~en tho ~roperty I(ne
ancl a gar~ge with R roll-up garage door ~_
___..
16 feet wide by 18 feet lonc~ for rsquired
drfveways, measured from tho properry Iine to a
c~a.raga with a rall-up garage door
D~corativ~ zy~e walt permitt~d ta presenre viAw
c~pportur~ities where a minimum 6-foot gracle
separation exists batween any arterial highway
and a property Ifne and a minimum ~12-fnot
setback exlsts betwoen the single-iamily
developm~nt and tho abavo-stated aonditions;
otherwisa a 6-foat high bl~ock ~wali is requirod
__.- -
70 fF:at, with the exception of open spaces lots
~ 5 faot wide tandscaped open spacQ area or
I easement ____
,__.__..~_....__._..~.--
WHEREAS, thQ City Planning Comm(ssion did hold a public h~aring ~t the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on August ?_1, 1996, at 1:30 p.rn., notice of said public hearing having bCha~rter 8.03
as required by ~ s der evido cerfar and aga ns tsaid propased~amendm~ntuand po in~astigate and make
to hear and co
findings and recommendations i~~ connection therewith; and
1MHEREAS, said CAmmission, after due inspoctian, investlg~tior and study made by itseif
and In its bohalf, and after dua consideration of al! ovidence and r9~aar4s offered at said i~earinq, c;oos r;nd
and determine the following facts:
1. That tho property encompassed by the Specific Pian, as amended, h~s uniqua sltQ
characteristics including topoc,raphf tho,stiecific plan`~ c ud'~~ng he~p ~po ed amend ~rnSha speci~l land
use and development standard~ o p
2, That th~ Spectfic'lan,~nnle ~a9~ t be ~me ded and withtttie pi.~posesn s a~ndahds and land
aolicies of the Gen~ral Plan, as rvco
use guidal(nes thersin;
3. That the ~pecific N~a p~ a~~ble with exi ~i qSand propos d devel"~~menlt in thevsurr~ undi g
a dasira~le character which wili be c p
area;
4. That the Sp~cific Pian, including the prop~sed amendments, Gontributes to a balanca of land
uses;
6. That ihe Spocifi~ Plan, inaludin~ the praposed amei.~iments, respects environmental and
aesthetic reaources cansistar~e oi sconomfc rea!(tios;
~. That the propased amendment to Specffic Plan No. F3&~1, acc~rdin~ Lo ttie su`bm6tteci fiscal
impact stud.y~ will not resuit In any additiAnaf or negat(vQ fiscal im~nct~ to the exist{ng Specific Plan area,
to its corresponding Community Facilities ~l~trict, or to the City'~ Gener~i Fund;
_2_ PC95-103
1~
7~,. That tha praposed amendment to tho Development Standard~ for povolapmant Area 5 of
Specffic Plan No. 8~1-1 w~li pnoald~ei~hbc~rhofoyds~ngle~famlly detached residential subdivision cor;~pifinentary
to existing adJacant reside 9
g. 'That approval nf im~ii~im a~s ~ d m~~ntia n ng exist ng mlianulf Wtu ed slop~s without ~equ~rning
rosidential tract using existing bu c~ p
any ret~ining walls adJacent to Woir Canyon Road; and
g. That no ane ~~d~n o~ osl~tiion to tha subjecc ipai ion~~ ~earing in opposition; and that. no
correspnndence was r~~eived pp
~q~~gN~q ~_ NVIRONMFNTAL n~ Al.l'1'Y 1~~7 I IiV : 7h~t the Anaheim City F~anninc~
Commisston has reviowe~l the praposai and does herof~y approve the N~~~tive aecla~atfon upon finding
that it lias considered the Negative Dih~~~~~os of h ehnitia st dy ~ d any ctomments~receiv ~t hat t elrv
r e v i e w p r o c q s s a n d f u r t h e r f i n d i n g o
is no evidence that the project will have a significant eHfoct on t he env ironme n t.
iVOW, 7HEREFORE, BE IT R~SOLVE~ that the Anaheim City Pianning Comm(ssion does
hereby recommond to the Cfty Council appraval af the propos~ amendm~r~ts to Specific Plan No. 08-1,
consisting of revised Exhibft 12 "Specffic Plan", Exhibit i5 "S~ocific Pl~n ~xhibEt A" and revised Fachibit 23
"Praduct Types chanc~ing the land us „~eDove oprnent Stand~rds fnr~Devolop entQAr~~a/5, a5 p oposed
S i n g l e F a r r ~ l l y D e i a c h e a~ a n d r e v i s i n g r e r e q u i s i t e t a t ~ i e
herein, upon the followir~~ conditionsin ~~~~~ao preseb e the ~fety and general el are of th~ Citixens
proposed use Qf the ~ubject property
of the C;fty of Anahoim:
1. 7hat completion of the praposed a n~~d~ t Not 338 byftha Anaheim~City Couni~`gent upon appraval
and adoptfon of Generai I~lan Ame
2. That prior to approval af Fin«i 'fract '.4ap No. 15223 (Qevelapment Are~ 5) or issuar~e of the first
bullding permit for Tract Map No. 15223, whichtver occurs first, the prnperty owner; develnper shall
pay apprapriate park and rscrmeno ~~e~~~~tQ°ho City of Anahe(m~inran2amount ~s esitabi~ish d by
residential units in said Develop
Gity ~~uncil Resoluti~n.
3. That prfor to appraval af Fin~! Tract Map No. 15223 (Develapment Area 5) or issuance af the first
buflding permit for'fract Map No. 15223, the praporty owner/d~veloper shail pay Branch Ubrary feEs
f~r the tw9nty-four (24) sfngle~Famfl~yliset~d be City`Council Resolution.Devolopment Are~ 5 to the City
of Eonahelm in an amount as 3s a Y
4. Tha~t app~'oval ~f thi~ applicati~n~co~ a~ ~~~fn pCntielai d any othsr appli ~bIA CityyStato and Federal
ft cc-mplies with tha Anaheim M~ c p ~
rogulatiorts. Approval daes n~t licabl~e o d(nantcenregul ton oa equiremonit nco or ~pprovai of the
req~~est re~arding any oth~r app
BE !7 FURTHFR RESOLVED that 4he Anai~efm Ciry Planning Commis~s~int's can hiance wftt
and determine that adpptfon ~af this Resalution is expres~ly predicated upon app P
each and all ofi the conditions hereinabov~ sex forth. 5hould any such conditio!L or any part the~ee f'this
deci~rod ir~val(d or uner~fd valsb~e eintco t~a iect~s aUnbe eemeci nulpandrvoident ~urisd~ctian,
Resolutian, and any appro
.~_ PC95-103
~' ~
TH~ FUFlEGOINQ RESULUTIOIV w~s adapt9~i at th~ Planning Commisslon meeting of
Au~ust ?1, 199~a, /~
V•
l
CI-I ~ OMAN, ANAWEIM Cl7Y f~ NNINC CdMMISSI NO
A71'EST:
_.._...~~~~ ' .
~~ MMISSION
SECR~'1'ARY, A HEIM IYY PLAN
STATE OF CAI.IFORNIA )
COUM'Y AF CIRANGE ) ss•
CITY OF ANAH~IM )
I, MargaritA Solorio, Sar,rotary ~f tho Anahoim Ctty Planning Commiaslan, do hereby cc~rtify
tha~ the foregoing n Auluufat 21, 1995, by the oilowi~ng~ ote of the members tha ~o~heim City Pls~nninfl
Carr~mission hald o g
AYES: COMMISSIONEFiS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRIS70L, HENNINGER, AdAYER, MESSE, PERA~A
NOES: COMMISSICJN~RS: Nt?NE
AI3~~N7: CONIMISSl4N~FiS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEFiEOF, I hava herounto set rny hand this ~~'day of ~~~
1995. ~Q~l ~(!'rt"J~
~
SECRETARY, NAHE M CITY PI.ANNING COMMIS510N
,~, PC95-103