Resolution-PC 95-120
RE L TI~N N. PC95-12Q
A RESULUTION OF THE ANAh1EIM CITY PI~Af~dNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONUITIONAL USE P~RMIT N0. 3790 6E GRANTE~
WH~REAS, t~ain rea! ~moperty si~tuated (nQha Cit ~ of Anaheimi Cou tyraf Orangei~StaQe
Conditional Use Pormit for ce ~
of Calffornia, described as:
f3FGIN~IINU AT A F'OINT' ON 7hiE SOUTH LINE ~F WFST BROADWAY WHICH
SAID POINT IS 40 FE~1' SOl1TH OF A POINT WNICH IS 132.Sa FEET ~aST CF
A CEM~NT MONUMEN7 MARKING THE NORTNW~S7 CORN~R OF l'' ~F7 OF
ANAHEIM EXT'ENSION", IN TFIE CITY OF ANAHCIM, AS 5HOWN ON A MAP OF
SURV~Y MADE BY WM. HAM~L AND FiLEl3 FOR RECORC~ W1TH THE GOUN1"Y
R~GORDEFi OF L.OS AhGELES COUN'fY, CALIFORNIA, SAID PUINT SEIiVG 7HE
INTERSECTION QF THE SUUTE~I LiNE OF WEST BROA~WAY WITW TWE WEST
LINE OF ADAMS STREET, RUNhIiNG 71-!ENC~ SOUTH 0 DEG. 10' WEST ALGNG
TH~ WEST' LINF OF SAID ADAMa STREET AND 7HE COPiTINUAI'ION 7fiEREOF
Q55.75 FEET TO TH~ SOUT~1 LItJE OF THE TRACI' OF LAND CONVEYED TO
THE ANAHEIM MANUFAC'fIJRING COMPANY SY QEED R~CORDED NOVEMBER
12, 1920, IN BOOK 378, PAGE 396 OF DE~C~S;1'HENCE 50U7H 88 DEfa. 57 1/2'
WES7 ALONG SAID S4UTH LINE 100.~0 FE~T TO A POfNT ON THE EAST LINE
OF TNE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE LOS AI.AMITOS Rf~ANCH OF THE SOUTI-IERN
PACIFIC FiAiLWAY; THENCE NORTH 0 DFG. 09' WESI' ALONG SAID EAST LIN~
248.44 FEET TQ A p01NT AND CONTfNUfNG ALONG SAID RiGHT OF WAY LINE
ON A CURV~ NORTHEASTERLY V111TH A RADIUS OF 35225 FEET TO AN
INTRT~E$~T~DEG 55' EAS7 A ONG S~ DS50UThi~LINE 34.44 FE ~ 0 TME
NO
POINT UF BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissian did hold a public hearing at tha Civic Center
in the City of Anaheim on September 18, 1995 at 1:30 p.m., no2lce af said p~blic hearing havinc~ been duly
given a~ required by law and in acc~rdanc~ with the prov(sfans of tl~e Anaheim ti4unicipal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hear an~i considor Ev(denae for and against said proposed conditfonai use permit and to
investigato and make findings ant! rocommendations in cannection therewith; and
WHEREAS, eid~c 5iderailon of all evidonce and rreportsso~ffered atn aid hear ng, does find
and in its behalf, and after du
anci dotermine the following ~acts:
1. That the proposed use is propariy ons for wliicli a canditfonal use permit is authorized by
Anaheim Municipal Codes Section 18.03.030.010 and 18.6i,050.502 to permit a tree seNice cor.tractor's
stnrac~o yard and ~ modular office builciing with waivers of the foilowing:
(a) ,~t.~'.Scti n 1 . 1. ~i3.013
(b) Secti~ ~3~
CR2487DM
Mi~im~~m vard are a~i g~.~~."tr .
5-fo t fullV I;~ndcr.aned setbar.k requirod along
Ac~ams Streot; nan~ proposQd)
Raa~i~ ired scrgenina of t c~r uses.
(6-faot hic~h chain !(nk fenee with r~~ w ar
ar ~lats requir~ed; 6-foot : igh chain link fence
with ,.~,I,~ ts i~ m~~.h scr~enina materi~ai p~'oposed)
.~ _ P~~95-120
2, 1'hat thero are snecial cfrcum~~ ~~c~s tapo~hor~identically zon~d p opertiesnn thetvicinity
shape, loaation and surroundings, which da pp Y
and that the proposed mesh on the 6-foot high chai S~is ~am ar~bietu Code roquired redwood tc~r'c dar
tho r~qufred lands~aping; and that the proposed me P
slats interwoven into the chain iink fenco;
g, 7hat strict applicatlon of the Zonl ~ on ~~„ ep~cinity becAUSe no o hreril prop rtles a Ung
other prope r t ies u n d e r i d e n t i c a l z o n f n~ c l a s s i f i c a
Adams Streot h~ve 5-foot front setbac!<s;
4. That ti~e proposQd contractarthat the modularSOff~ ce bufiding~is noWlisted therafntias being
permit is atrthorized by tha Zoning Codo and
a permi4ted use;
~, That the proposed use will not ad ~0 beylocatechbecausensaidnuseSe~compatible withtha
develapment of the area in which it is praposed
surrounding industrEal neighborhood ~nd the rail road O~ahe a d and~exlstin~ esider~tial d eli ngs to he
provide a buffier between the proposed contractor s s g Y
WBSi;
g, That the sizo and shape of the 5~8 detrimenta~to the particu a~r aeat nor tallaw~ t~h~e f~u~ll
deveiopment of tris proposed use in a manner na
health, safety, and generai wc~ifare;
7, That the traffic generated by the propo t„ tf aif ci`iln ~h~ aPeae an undue burden upon the
streets and highways d~signed and Improvod to ca ry
g. 'fhat the granting of tho conditio 'a~ welfar~e of the cit.f~~ns oftlhe City of A aheimnande
detrimental to the peace, health, safety and gnne
g, 'That no ane ind(cated their presence at said pu~lic hearing in opposition; and that no
osition to the subject petition.
corrosp~mdonce was rec~lved in opp
AS~LIF~RNIA ENVIR NMEN1'AL OUALITY ACT F4NDIN~: Thal the Anahoim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit f~outdoQNiuses~and minimumryarGi area abuttin~ tlocal
office bi~ilding with waiver of required screening o
3treet on an irreyulariy-shaped parael of land cohavinn a of rox mratenfron ages of 40 feet on the so~ h
~outhwest corn9r of F3raadway and A~arns Street, 9 pP
side of Br~adway and 355 feet on the wast side e p ~~a~tionrupan f ndinghthat~eherc~ec aration~ eflects
Broadway; and daos hereby approva tho ~IegatN
the fndependent Judgement of the lead agency a"blich evfow processiand further i( din'g oneherbasis
together with any comments reaeived uuiing the pu
of the fnfti~l study and any Gomments raceived that there is no substantfai evid~nce 4hat the projoct will
have a signfficant effect on the anvironment.
NOW, THEREF~RE, BE Il' RESQLVED that tha Anaheim ~ity Planning Commissfon does
hereby c~rant subJect Petition for Canditional Use P~ u$~8 p~nhQ subJel t property niporder to p eserv~e the
found to be a nece s s a ry p r e r e q u i s i t e t o t h e p r o p o s e
safety and general welfare of tha ~;itizens of the CiCy af Anaheim:
1, 7hat no retafl sales~ of tirewocxi shall be permitted on-stte.
Pc~95-120
-2-
'~~ ~
2. That na on-~it~ mulching ahall bo perminecl.
3, That no anmp~~ting sh~ll bo uc~rmittod on-site
q, Th~t th~ owner af subjoct property ahall submit R l~tter requeatinp terminatian af Conditional Use
Permft No. 3555 (pormittin~ a recr~atlonal vehicle and ~aat otorAge faoility witli walv~ra) tn the Zoniiig
Dlvision.
5. Th~t subJect proporty shail bo doveloped substantialiy in accordanca with plans and specifir,ationa
subm(tteci to the City of Anah~im by the petitionar and which plans are on filo witM the F'lanning
Department m~rked Exhibit Na 1
6, `~hat prlar to issuanc~ of a buildin~ pqnnit Qr wfthln a periad o( one (1) year fmrr- the d~te of this
~esalution, whichover occurs first, Conditlon Na. 4, above-mentfonod, shall bo campl(ed with.
E~.~tensipns for further time ta cr~mploto said conditfons may be granted in accordance with Seotlon
1a.03.090 nf the Anahoim Municip~i Cocfe.
7. That pr(or to fin~l building and 2oning fnspoctf~ns, Condition No. a, above•mentfon~d, shall be
complled with.
8, That approval of th(s application canstitutos approval af the propos~d roquest only ta the axtont that
it complies with the ;na~elm Mu~lc(pal ~oning Ccxlo and any othor applicabie City, State and Federa!
regulations. App~oval dAeg not include any action or iindings ~s to compliance or approval oF th9
request reparding ariy other applicabl~ ardir~ance, regulation ar raquirem~nt.
9. 1'hat truck maintenance cnnsfsting of routine oil chan~es and tune-ups shatl t~ke place only firom 8:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
10. That a maxirnum of four (4) shipping cont~iners shall be maintoinod an-sfte.
11. That the proposed slgn shall be fimitai to an efght (8) foot high monument sign with a maxfmum ?y
(40) sg.it. signago area.
Bk IT FURTHER RES4LVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commfssion dnes hereby f(nc1
ar,cl determine that ad~ption of this Resolution Is exprossly predicatgd up4n a~plicant's compliance with
each and all of the con~itions hereinabove set focth. Should eny such c~nclition, or any part thnreof, be
declar~d (nvaifd or uneniorceabfe by th9 fir.ai judgment of any caurt of compotent ~urisdiction, ti~en tliis
Resolution, and any approvais horQin contafned, sl~all be deemed null and void.
TH~ FOHECOING RESOI.Ul'ION was adnpted at the Plann(ng Commission meeting of
.w-.
Septomber 18, t995. ~~ _~~~i ~~~ ~.. J_ -
CH OMAN ANAHEIM CIIY P NNINC COMMISSION
ATTE~T: ~G~./7~'QrR~(.ILC.r_~B~A~~
S~CREI'ARY, ANAI~~iM C{1`Y PLANNIM(3 COi~IMISSION
`
~- PC95-120
!
~~~
,~
~'~i'
S7ATE OF CALIFO~INIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss•
CIYY C~F ANI~HEIM )
I, P~largarit~ Solorio, Searatary of the Anahelm City Planning Commission, da h~reby certffy
that the fA~e~oing rosolution wan passecl arid adoptod st a moeting of th~ Aneh~irn Ciry Planning
Commtsslon held o~ September t8, 19J5, by th~ fnllowin~ voto o~ the membars thorAOf:
AYES: COMMISSION~RS: NON~ ~~K' BRISTOL, HENNI~1GEFi, MAYER, MESSE, P~RAZA
NOES: CnN1MISSiONER~:
pBSCNT: COMMISSIQN~RS: BOYDSTUN
~ ~~t' day of _~~~~'~.~..~
IN WITN~SS WWEREOF, I hav~ horeunto sot my hand this ,__~____
1995. ~
SECRE"fARY, AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~- PC95-120