Resolution-PC 95-121~~ ~
R~ O! ~R~N-~SL..PSr~~_12:?
A R~SOLUTION 4F i'I~C ANAHEIM CI'fY PI.ANNING CQMMISSION
7HA7 PET~710N ~~7R CONDI71nNAL USE PERMIT N0. 37~?. B~ URANTED
WHGREA$, tM~ An~hoim Gity Planninp Commission did recoive a verffiod Petition for
~onditfonal Uso Permit for certaln real propo~ty situ~ted in the Ciry of Anahofm, County of Oranpe, State
of Califarni~, doscrlbocl as:
F.~.RCEL 1: THE SOU'TH~RLY 253.00 ~EET OF THF S~JI.iTI-IEAST (~UAFi7ER OF
THE SOl3Tl•I~A57 ~U~-FtT~R OF THE SOU'~NWEST t~UARTGf~ OF TNE
SOlJ7hIV'J~SY QU~1f~7ER OF SECTION 12, IN TOWNSHIP ~4 SOUI'H, RANGE 11
WEST, IIJ T~~1~ RANCHO LOS COYQl'ES, A`NpTHE OFFICC OF TM~ OU !TY
pqQE 11 OF MISCELI.~INE4U5 MAPS,
R~C4RDER OF S~ID ORANGE CI~UNTY.
EXC~PT TF~,4T POR710N CON~EMNED BY THE ST~ATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY
FINAL ORQEFI OF CI~NUEMNATlQN, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WI~ICH WA~
RECORDED JULY ~aTHE COUN'~Y ECOR~E OF SA DFOR,AI` 4IE C0~ ON S,
IN TFIE OFFICC: O
AL~O EX~E~T THE ~AS'r aa5.o0 FEE7 TMER~~F.
PARCEL 2: Th1E W~ST 50 FEET 4F THE ~AST ~45AQ FEET ~C~TH MEASUR~n
ALONG T'WE SOUTH~RI.Y LINE OF 7HE SOUTHEFiLY 253.00 FEET OF 'fhfE
~OUTH~AST GIUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ~lUAR~'ER OF THE 50UTHN ES~
QUARTER OF SEGTION 12, IN TOWNSHIP 4 SOU'~H, RANGE y 1 WEST,
STATE OF
~tANC~-{O LOS L4YdTES, CITY OF ANAWEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
CAI.IFORNIR, A~ P` A~~~ MN THE OQFIGF OF THE COUN7Y fi~.CORUER 0~
MISCEI.LANEOUS
SAID ORANGE COUPJTY•
EXCEP'~ THAT POR710N CONDEMNE~ BY THE STA7F OF ~AUFORNfA EiY
FINAL ORD~R OF C4NDEMNATION, A CERTIFIEU COPY QF WHICN WAS
RECOFIDED JULYF 9~i-iE COUti'lO RECORD~R OF SA DFOFiANGE COUNTY. S~
IN TWE OFFICE 0
PARCEL 3: TF1E WEST 50 FEE'f UF 'TFiE EAST 395.()0 FEET, ~3ATI-I MEA5UAED
AL4NG THE SOUTHERLY LINE ~F THc SOUTHERLY 253.00 FEET OF TWE
SOUThiFA~T QUARTFR OF THE SOUI'F~IWEST AUAR7ER U~ SECI'IUN 12,
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, FiAN~E 11 WES7, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, CITY
OF -'1NAIiE1M, COUNTY t~F ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFO~NIA, A5 PFR MAP
RECORDED IN ~~RECORDER C3F SAIDi COUN'i'Y EO~JS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE
OF TME ~OUNTY
CXCEPT THAT PQR710N CON~EMNED BY THE STAT~ OF CALlFORNIA BY
FINAI_ O~iDER AF29 ~~~ NNBOOIN~3989 PAQE I~83, ~3FF CIQ+L ECOR S~S
RECORDED JUI. ~
p~-RCEL 4: THE YV~ST 150 F~E7 OF'i'HE EASr 345.00 FEE'f, BOTH MEASURED
ALONG 7HE SOUTHEFiLY UNE OF 7HE SOUTHEFiLY 253•0~ F~ES' C~~ jH~
SOiJTHEAST GIUARTER OF THE SOUTHWES'f t~UART~R OF SEC710N i2, HV
TO'~UNSHIP 4 SOU7H, RANGE 11 W~ST, IN THE FiANCHO LOa COYOTES, CITY
OF ANAHEIM, COUN'T1f ~F QRANGE, STATE OF CAUFnRNIA, AS F'ER MAP
RECARDED !N B~4~C~pD~ FOF SAIDfORANGE CAUStViMy pS, IN ?HE OFFIC~
QF THE COUNT`~ R p~g,.121
CR2~88DM ~~ ~
' ~.~+1
~~
FJ(CEpT 7HAY PqRTION CnNDCMNGCI BY TI-IE STA7E OF CALIFORNIA BY
FINAI. ORDER OF 'CONDEMNA710N, A CERi'IF~IEQ C01'Y OF WHlCH WA~S
Fi~CORDED JULY 25, 9987, iN ~O~K a~as, PAGE 163 OF OFFICIAL RF:CORDS,
IN THE OFFICE: OF 'THE COUN'I'Y RECORDER OF SAID OR~'1NG~ COUNTY.
WhICREAS, tho City Plannin~ Commission did t~old ~ public hearinfl ax the Civic Genter ~~~von
City of An~helm ~n S~ptQmber r~ance wl~h the pravision5 of~h~ Anahefim Munic pal C(~debGhapter 8.03,
~s r~quired by law a-~d in acco
to hear and c~nsider evldencntl~~'~nd in9~Qn~~~~ on t erea~ h pandiar~al use porrnit ant~ to Investi~ate an
make ffndlnDs and recomme
WH~R~AS, s~id Cammisslr~n, ~f ~~I evidoncoeand reportsto~~fered at said ho ng, doestfind and
in its bal~alf, and aftor dua cansidaratlan o
determino the foll~wing facts:
1. That the propos~d usa fs prope~ly ~ane for which a condition~l use parmit is authorized by
AnahQim Municipal Codo Sectlon 18.4a .n~~ I centatlwith walv~ers of ha failow ng:elf-stora9o faciifty iri
conjunctic~n with a propo~e~! c~mmerc
(o) Ssctio~~ ~ 8.~4.Q63.040 . . A~i lmum stn ctut~~~ k n vard
~~n~.
(,~f,~t requlrod fram RM-120D zoning alon~ the
-i~rth property Ilne;
nong propased)
~~~ ~i~rtion 18 06 02Q.022_ - A~in(m,~m num er rafi o~k_i~g~•
~Q 02Q 0~ 4• 1? required;
~~ O~Q~ 2~ proposod and r~cammended by the
~~Q City Traffic and 7ransportatian Manafler)
and 18.44.Q~§;.~,SQ
1. Tt~at tha propasod praJ~ct involves the demalition of an outdat~ and v~cated commercinl
rotail cani~r which will be replacai by as foQt hi h decoratw i block waUASet back 10 feei from tha right o`f-
Avenue will gene7aNy be screaned by a 9
way;
2. That waiver (~t) is horeby approvod on the baQis that there are specfal ciriums~t other
applicabla to tha property consiating of its lacation and su~round(ngs, which do not app y
identicafly zo~ed prap~rtles in `t~h~~envfir 8 noKh p operty Ifne~and that said gara.gesuatlensln Ilar in li ght tr
series of resldendal garages ab g
the propos~d commerciai building;
3. Th~t strict appllaation oclas tfication n~the vicinity; ~he prpPArty of privileges en~oyeci by
other pro~ertf~s under identfcal zoning
4. That ttie ttses are distributed in the propps~ed Qoaia ~a ter as shown on the fcilowing chart
a.nd that the retail!rsstaurant uses ~~e only 3°6 of the
~e FIQQf~raa pe~cent
'Retaii ~~ 1,a26 sq.it. 2~
7ake•cwt restaurant 1,2~0 sq.ft. 196
a~4~.4-~.'QE~-,.,,-.--- 71 ~~Q cn:'~,- -- - p7096
TOTAL 74,ML6 ~sq.ft.
_2^ PC95-121
. , ~ ~.4
~; ;y, '~'r ;:!
~~IY
,, 7hat fihe ro~uired parking far tho proposecl retafl c~nt~or~fcs Aasllshnwn on~ he fol owinq ,;'
storaga fac:iilty ~~vhiah accaunts for A9~~ of tc~tal numbar of roqulred p
chaK;
i __,_, ~a' k~P~_._..---- Perce~
R"~ ~ 7 spacos ~°,G
Tak9~~out re:3tauranti 6 spaces ~
.~.QL.~9r~~ 11
Total 125 Sp~Ces 1009h
6, Yli~tt the propasecl parking waiver (b), for 28 parking spac;es, is reasonable ~n~i adequatA `;+
for this sp~cifie reRaH conter becauso anly 13 parking spaces ~ kin Q su acHS sp cffled by Ccxle for gene al
and tllo self stora~e facllity will „~q~ generate the number of pa g p
induatrial ~ises; ~
~. Thr~t the r~questod parking waiver wa~ substantiate~ by a parkfng demand study preparecl ;
by Traffic Safoty Engineers and daterJ July 10, 1995; e~~ii~~ tcom e cfai~`retaitl c~r~te ~ th~ s~IMstor ge
has revfewed ~nd approved subject study for thig sp
facilities;
g, 'fl7~t walver (b), under th~ condit(ons lrnposed, ~NIII not caua~ f~wer off-street p~rking
spaces to ba provided fior such usa than na~rmal and~rPasona ly o esoeable co dit ans of oper~ation af
v~hiciRS attr(butable ta such use ur~der the
such use;
g. 7hat waiver (b), undhe ~ublic st eie snin tho lmmed ate vicinity ofethe p oposod u e; and
c o m p e t ft i o n f o r p a r k i n g s p a c e s u R o n p
10. That wa(ver (b), under the conditfons irnpo~~d Wi~mmecfiaterviclnity of h~ posed
competitfon for par k ing space s u p o n a d j a c e n t p r i v a t e p r o p e n y I n t h e
use ~wnic:h preperty (s not expressly provlded as parking for such use under an agreement in cornpl lance
with Section 18.06.010.0?0 of thfs ~Cade);
11. That waiver (b), unde`cts withinitholoFf-spee parking areds or lots provided 9 risuch u'se;
air pollution, ~r traffic circulatior con~ ,
12. That waivsr (h), unde Qs~eto or ei~ess from dJ~ic,en~ propertiest upon the pub~c st eie~s
air p41lutlon, or impedo vehicula~ ing 9
in the immecilato vicinity nf the proposed use;
13. That the proposerl t~se is propo~ly one for which a cundil(on~l u~R permit is authnrized by
thc~ ~onin~g Code;
14. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoini~g Innd uses and the grc~wth and
development of the a~ea in which it is propoSQd to be located;
15. Thnt the sizo ancJ shape a~~ e~r nQt decrirnentai o the partic~i a~r ~areet no~ tn't e pe ~oll
development of the propos~d use in a
hoalth, safety, ~nd general wolfar~;
16. That the traffic gene~tedo y~~h1 ~~~ th~O i~tfi c~in he ar~$~ ~n undue burden upon the
streotg a~d t~ighways dosignad and p
17. 7htit the grant(ng of the~c~ ~~ne ~~ w~f~e of the cltizens of~tha City af Anaheirnnande ~
detrimenta! to the paace, health, safety ~ ~
-3, PC95-121
18. 7hat no ~ivo~ ~n~ a tQOSit an ar the subJoctapet tionlla hearing in opposition; and inat no
eor~~spondence was rece e pp
, '*~;~,~ tho Anahelm City Pl~nning
~„LIFCRI JIA kNVIRONI~JII~NTA I.~.ACl' FINDI I;
Commissipn has roviewed the pruposal to permit a sc~lf-storaga facillt~ in conjunction with a proposed
commercial retail conter with waivers of minimum structure setbactc incl minfmum number of p~.rking
soacos on ~ r~aatangulariy shapad parcel of land cansisting ofi ~pproxiniately 2,3 acros, having a fronta~e
r~'~ approximately 470 feet on tho narth sicle af Lincoln ~4venue, havin~ e maximum depth of approximatiely
213 feet, baing locat~d approximately 19~ fodt west of the centerlino of ~ale Avenua and further desr,ribed
as 2815-2853 West Lincoln Avenu~ndent~ud emsntyof~he lead ag~~~icy andthatati has canslder d~tho
the declaratfan reflecta the indepe j 9
Negative Doclaration tog~tl~er with any comments roc~ivocl during !~ie publia reviow procoss and further
finding an the basis af tpie initinlifi ant e ect on the envi onment ~Jd that there Is no substantial evidence
that th~ prajact wlll havo a sig
NQW, TMEREFORE, BE IT RFSO~VE~ that the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission does
hereby grant subjc~ct Potitlun for is~O~ndo ithe I r~pASed uiseUO ~tho subJe`ct property iniporder to p eserve the
found to be t~ nocessary prarequ p
safety a~d ganeral welfaro nf tho Citizens of the Clty ~f Anaheim:
t. That subJect facfiity shall be Ilmitecl to one (1j freestandinfl Idsntiffcatlon sign not exceeding twenty
five (25) feet fn height. The final sign pian shaU be submitted to the planning Dopartment for review
and approval by the Planning Commission as a"R9port~ and Recommendations" ftem.
2. That a l.ot Line Adjustment Plat to combine the four (4) existing lots shall be submitted ta tha
Subdivision Section. Followinc~ approval by 1ha City Engineor, it shail be rerorclecl in th~ C~ff~ae pf
tha Aranc~d Caunty Recorder.
3. That a plan sheot f4r soiid Wnance~for~~review ancl app ~val~ a plan for rocycling shall be submittec!
to the Qepartrnent of Mainte
q. Th~t ~the developer shall subm{t a water quality managoment pfan (WG~MP) speaifically identifying the
best managament practli~ebe submitted to thenP bHc Works I~ny nieer n'g Department~, ~ev~l pment
runoff. The W~MP sha
Services Division, for roview and approval.
~. That ~ny restaiar~nt tenants in the retail are~ shal! be limited ta take-out faCflities only with a ma:cimum
of ten (10) soats each.
6. Th~t the owner nf su ,ject property sh~ll submit a letter to thv Zonin~ Diuislon requestiny terminatipn
of Conditional Use Pormit NoC~ zonv with wafvca ofsminimum numbee~of parking spac ~~~to rotain
an auto rental agency in the
7, That suhjc~at pronerty shall be developed substantially in acc;ordance with pl~ns and speciflcatfons
submFtted to the City af Rnah~im by tha petft(oner and whi~h pians are on file with the Pianning
Department marked Exhib(t Nos. 1 th~ough 6.
s. That the granting of the parking waiver is cantlnflent upon oporatian of the use in conformance with
the assumptions relatinc~ to the operation and iiitensity of us~ as contafned in the parking demand
study thac 4omied th~ basis Eor approval of sakJ va~iance. Exceading, vlalating, intansi(ying or
othe+wise doviatinq from ~ny of said assumptions, as contafned in tfie parlcing demand study, shall
be ~esmvd a violation of(t nAp~ ~reos~sf ~a~idp~orsS~n p~s~ Upr~vis~lon3 af Sect on3~ 1a q3 091basyd
that varlancQ to terminat n
18.03.092 of the Anahefm Munici{za! Cade•
~ pC95-121
,`h
:~' ,
orlod of one (1) ycaar from the ~date of this ;
g. That prior to Issuance ~f a huilding permit ar within +~ p
2, 3, 4~nd 6, above-mentioned, shall be
r~sol~~tion, whichever occurs first, Canditfon Nos. 1,
wfth. Extonslans for further tlme t~ complata said conditians may be ~rantod ln accordance
corr~pliod
with Section 18.Q3.t~90 of tho Anahdlm Munlcipai Code,
1'hat prior to final bulldin~ and zoning ins~3ections, Condition No. 7, abova-mentione~, shal! be
complied wfth.
t~ roval of this application constftutes approval uf the pr~~h~ g~ ~~~~~~~ City, Sta e and F de a~
1•t . 7ha pp rav~l of the
it complies with ~he Anaheim INunfcipal Zonin~ Cocie ~nd~ any p
rs ulations. Approval cioes not inciude any action or fin~dip g oa ~qL~~°emenit nce or app
~ Ilca~le ordin~nce, rsgu
re~quest regarding any other app '~
Ci~ IT FURTHER FiESOLVCD that tho Anaheim City Plann~ng~n ~~pllcant's compliance wit~
and determine that adoption of this Rasalution is expressly predicatvd P ~rt xhoraof, bo
eacti and all of the conditions herelnabova set fnrth. Shofian ncourt of competantrju is ction, than thi:;
doclared inv~lfc~ or unen~QVals~ha eintcontAfned~shalinbe de~med null ar~d uaid.
Resali~tion, ~nd any app
THE FCIREGOING A~501_UTI4N was adopted at the Pla~nln~ C~ ~mmission meeting af
September 18, 1995. ~ ~j ~~~
' ~ ~ /ll
CHAI MAN ANAH~1PJi CI7Y P NING COMMISSION
ATI'CST: , ~.
s~~ ~.~__..___._.
SECRE'1' RY, NAHEI CI"fY P iVNING COMMISSION
STATC QF CALIFORNIA )
COUN7Y OF ORANGE ) ss•
~iTY OF ANAH~IM )
I, Margarita 5olorlo, SecrAtt~ry of the Anaholm City P~anning rommission, da heroby certify
that the forego(ng resalution was passQC! and adopted avote ~f the memb~rsthereofi Ci~ planning
~ ggg by the following
Commission held an Sept~mber 18, .
AYES: COMMISSION~RS: BOS'NV~CK, BRISTOL, HENNINCaER, MAYEFt, MESSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIQNEFtS: NONE
qBSENT: COti1MISSiONERS: BOYDSTUN
f~~'''dayof ~
IN W~'~~~ES~ WHEREI~F, I have t~ereunto set my hand this ______,.,_.
1 J95. ~ ~J ~~
~~M~~ SECREfA , AN~ EIM CITY lANNING COMMISSION
pC95-121
-5-