Resolution-PC 95-126~~,
,~,~;~OLU710N NO,_ PC95-~
-,~: -,i1
~1 F?~$C3~.U1'ION OF 7H~ ANAMEIAA CI1'Y I'I.ANNINU ~OMMISSION
THAT ~'~YITI~~N FOR COND1710NAL t~3~ P~RMIT N0. 379~4 i3E GiFiANTED
WHl:REAS, 4h~ Anaheim Clty Pla~r~~ing Commi~~lon dld reoa~ve a verifted Petftion far
Conditionsal l.lsa Perm{t for cr~rrai~~ real ~roperty situ~ted In the Cit~r of Anaheim, Ca,mty af Orange, 3t~attt
of Calffornia, describe~:1 as:
PARCEL 1, IIV T~~E. C{'TY OF ANAI-IE{M, COUN7Y ~F ORANGE, STATE OF
Cl~;..IFORNIA, AS ~~h~AWN ON A MAF FIL~D iN BOOK 27, PAGE 2 01= PARCEI.
MAF'S, IN THl3 O~F~:C~ 01= TH~ GOUN'1Y RECORDER OF t7RANGE COUNTY,
CALI-"ORNIA.
Wh;~REAS, tho City F'lanning Commisslon dfd hold a pubUc haarlnb at the Civ{c Center
in the Ciry of Anaheim on Octobor 2, 1995 at 9:30 p.m., natice of said public hoaring having been duly
9iven as requfred by law and in ~caordance with the pravigions of the Anaheim Muniaipal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hear and cansider ovldena~ ~ar and lgalnst s~~id prapasvd c~nclltional use pormft and to
irvestigate and make flnciings ~nd ro~ommondations in con~~aotian tharow(th; and
WHEREAS, ~alc! C~~mmi~siun, after due insp~ction, fnvostigat(ora and study mado by Itseif
and in its tehalf, ar~d aiter due c~onsidoratian of all evidance and rAports offerdd at ~Id hearing, doos find
and d~termine the follawln~ facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly nne for which a conditional use permft is authc~rized by
Anahoim Municipal Caie SACtlon 1~3.q3.a30.010 to permft an automobi{e sales f~cility wfth walver of the
falluwing:
~.~_~.~,.~i~4 - ,~'armittes~ ercrc~,,,r1~~,n~r,L i~~gSl ~~ ~~~
(automobilo display,~ r i tg~, ta encroach in4o tha requfred frflnt setback
along La Palm~ Stree~t;
display area f~r ~ i~ Proposed)
2. That the proposed dlsplay ar~a in the front setbar.k along l.a Palma Avenue will bs us~c!
to display only f(v9 automobilos;
3. That there are special clrcumstr.~nct~s applicab~e to the property consisting ot fts $ize, s'~ape
and loc7tion whfch cio nat apply to other id~nticaily zoned propertie~ in the vicin{ty because ~ritical
Inters~ctian vrldening hag reduced the available front ~etbac6c by a~+proximataly 10 feat and the existin~
bulldir.q already encroaches Into the mfnimum 50-foot fro~t setback;
4. 7hat st~lat ~p{~IfcatiAn ~f the Zoning rod~ deprfv~s ~he property of privilogos ~naoyed by
other propertles under identicsl ioning classifi~atfon in the v(cinity;
5, That sub.(~ct us~ wlil be a Conditional Use urxier authority of p~ndln~J Code Section
18.110.1(:0.050.0~26 p~rtafning W Specif}c Pl~n Na. 34-1 (the Narcheast Area SpecffiG Pian) whtch was
adopted b~y the Ctry CouncW on September 12, 19J5; end since subject area is desi{~nated f~r commorclal
uses by th9 Specitlc Plan, ti~o propasa~ Is compt~tf~lA with the obJvatives of the Speciffc Pl~n and
sunounding land u~es;
_~. PC:~i~126
CR2~97DM.WP
,~
~
6. 7hat the proposed u~a is not currently Iisted ~n the 7oning Code as ~~ uormlttec! uso;
7, That the p~~QpQS~'a c Is Wro~osed to be lacfated he aclJain(ng land uses ~nti the growth ~nd
clovet~pment of tho Area In which f p p
8. Tl~at tha size and shape~~n ee not detrimen a~tn t e particu a~r area~ nor~ toitha p~acel
development of tho pra~ns~! use in ~
health, aa4~ty, and ~en~rai weifare;
g. That iho trafflc generat~p Q~ ~PC~ ryat~ ~~ cl,in ~he apea~ ~~ undue burden upon th~
streets and hi~hways de~~gned and Imp
10. 7hat the grnnting of the ~n~nditi~nn~a1~' WeIPa e af he cit zens a'ftlih~ City o~R ahallmnancf~
detrimental ta the peace, health, sataty 9
11. That no nne indf p ted ~i~~n ~r ~he ubjectspatit~lonlic h~~ring in opposition; and that no
carrespondonce w~s rec~ived in pp
CAL.IFO IA ENVIR0~IM~NT~~~ALITy~.~T ~!!~5?~.l~lS.~ That th~ Anahoim City Planning
Commission has reviowc~d the proposail to permit an autamobila salea facflity wi4h waiver °f roxim te{~
~ncroachments into required yard +~roas on an irrec~ularly-shapoti paraol Uf land consisting ~PP havirig a
p.43 aGra, having a froMage of approximately 110 feet on the south sld~ of La Paima Avonus,
rnaximum dapth of approximat~ly 187 feet, F~Afng loc~e-sd appr~xima~ely 420 feet east of the centsrline of
l.akeview Avenu~ ~nd further described as 4530 East La Palma Avenue; and daes horeby ap~rove the
Nggative Declaration upon finding thaNeh a we D cleratian togothar withpany cotmmen~s eceivRd du~ng
~gency and that it has aonsfderecl the g
the public review prucess and further f1ndii„ o~o eCbWill have afsignificant ~ffe on the d viranment~
that there is no substantlal evidenaa ti a p 1
NpW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RE~OLVE~ tnat the Ar-ahefm City Plannin~ Commisslon does
heroby grant subjoct Petitian ior Cond~ tha I oS osod us~~ o~hofisubjelct property in~ order,ta p ersenretha
found to be a necessary ~rerequfsite P p
safoty and ~eneral welfAre of tho Citfzens of the Cfty of Anahoim:
t. 7hat final lanciscapp plans ~hawing (a) mfnimum ten (10) fc~ot larulgcaped i e f~ e atlfnee~~et° een
ea~t properry line (in front of the parking spacas) and adjacent to tha we1~ e1 a~~s for alm trees
p
the 5-car d(splay are~ and the prcperty Ilne) and (b) minimum of two (2) p
fn front nf the automobile d(splay area shall be submitted to the Zon(ny L~ivision ~f tha Planning
Department for reviow and approval by the Plannin~ Commisslon as a"Reports and
Recommendations" itAm. ~
2. That there sha~l be na more thcles shaU,be di played ansidg tehdaibuihding o~1ly) hp~t setback area at
~ny given time. All other veh
3. That there shall be n~ outdoor storage in any requfred parking area.
~. Tt~t only Iight vehlcie proparatton shall be pormitted and that commercial repalr or maintenanco w~,rk
shs~ll ,Q,~ b~ pe-mitted.
5. That subJect property shA11 be d~ve~l~p~d ~ub~forneta and whichdplans a ehonlafile ~ t~ciplantn~inq
s u p m i tt s c i - o t h e C i ry o f A n a h~ y P Q
D~partment markeci ExhibEt Noa. 1 and 2.
.2_ PC95-125
`~,. _: ~r
'~
6, That prior ta final bullding and xonfi sti Condit on Nos.1t aind ~pabove-mentloned, shalf be c~mplaod
of this resoluti~n, whichover occura ,
with. ~xtonslona far further time to coC platC s~a~ conclltiona may be granted !n acaord~nco with
S~ctian 18.03.A90 of tho Anaheim Mu p~-
7. '1'h~t approval af this appllcatla~nici a! ~on n, ~C~~de ~nd any othor applecable Cityy 5tate ancl FecierA~
it cnmplies wlth tho Anaheim Mu p g
rogulatlona. Apprnval dQes not licabtle o dfnanoenregul t an~ oa equirem~nt nce or ~pprovai of the
requost rogar~ing any othor app
BE IY FUR7h~ER RESOLVCD that ~he An~helm Ciry F'lanning Commiaslon rioes her~by find
and detarmine that ada~tlon of this Resalutio~i is expressly pratlic:ated upan ap~l(cant's ~~~ thA eofwbe
each antf all of the conditions herelnabave set f~rth, Should any suc:h condition, ar a~y p
declared invafid ar unenforceable bY thantained~shalelnb~ doemetJu ull and void9nt Jurisdiction, then this
Resolutlon, and ~ny approvalg herain co
THE FORECOING RESOLUTION was adapteci at tho Rlanning Commisslon rn$atin~ of
October 2, 1 ~15. ~i
~G ti~„~''_
CMAIRMAN, PR4 EMPOR~
~,~Iq~-IE~M C~T1( • NNING CQMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ' ~~
-~ ~~~ ITY I.ANNlN 0 MISSION
SECREl'~{~Y~ NAHE M C
STATE OF CALIFQF~NIA )
GOUN7Y 0~ ORANGE ) ss•
CITY ~JF ANAHEIM )
i, Margarita Solorio, Sacr~t~ary of the Anaheirn City Plannfng C~mmission, do horeby certify
that the foregning resolution was passed and adoptc~ at a meetinq of ihe Anaheim Cfty Planning
Cornmission held on October 2, 1995, by the fotlowing vota of the mombers thoreof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: O~~ ICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MIESSC
NOES: COMMIS5101VEHS•
ABSENT: COMMISSIUNFRS: MAYER, PERA7A
~~'~ day af ~~~._~
IN WITNFSS WHEREOF, i h~va ~ereunto set my hand th(s ,~ ._
1 ~.~3~.'~. . ,
SECRETA ~Y, NAHE CI'f'( PI.ANNING COMMiSSI~N
~,~- PC95-126