Loading...
Resolution-PC 95-134~ ~ ; 8.~~.~~.~ ~~~~:.~.4 A RESQLUTION OF TMiE AMAHEIM CITY POF A ~~ pvqMp~ ~ION AMENpING CCRTAIN C~NDITI4NS R~ESCILU'I ~d COND ONAI. USE PERMIT Np, •N7ggC~lON WITN Wh~EREAS, on Novomber 21, 1977 the Planning Commissi f~nr ~ra or~{~ of o ie yA~'r);Sa d that Np. a t6mA~extens`lans wo e~pprnvedntlia(last nna ax~plringdon, No ember 21 ~1941; throe WHEFiEAS, Con~i¢~on PJ~. 2 ~ffo~IloNl~utinn Na. PC77-25E~, grantetl in Connectlon with Candltlonal Use Permf~ No. 1789, specifies the 9 °~. That the proposad use is flrant bro he iP annin~Commfssfon fol urw ng a~wr~iiten ec~uest by tlme ex~onsfonQ may be granteci y the petiti~n~r ar~ ~f i~ is determ~ned that the use has not been detrimer-tal to tha area." WHEREAS, t: •• ~ un'' ~t ~ving proFiarty is currontly dovelo~ed with a m~attipia tenant commorciai tetail center includirig H~' oU sc! ft• full-servi~e rostaurant. WHEREAS, t'~~ petitianer F~as rsquQSted to arnanciment said Conditian Na. 2 to pormii the continuod s~le of b~er tt+nd •~ lne. WE1kREAS, the City Planning Commi~sion did hold a p~'~Ilc hearing at the Civic Center in the ~ity of Anaheim on actober 16, 1 J95, awith he 1 ravisioins of t el An~hoiim Muni~^~ipalvCodo, Ch pter c~iven as r~quired by law and in accordanc~ p 1a.(13, ta hear and consider ev(dence 8~r and a~o~ t~~ewith~and ~mendment and to i~west(gate and m~ke ffndings and recommend~tfons in connec WHEREAS, said Commis5ion, a(ter due Inspectl~ ~n, investigation and study made by its~if and (n its behttlf, and aftor due consideration of all evidence ana reports oif~r~ at said hearin~, d~es fina and determfn~ the foliawfng facts: 1. That subJect conditianal use pe'mi~t is~ QU~I~c peace~hiea hm afety and ~enerralnw~~fareh~ particular area and surrounding land uses, no p 2. That no one indicatecf thefon ta tho s~+bjec~t fpetnit onC hearing in opposftion; and that no correspanden~e was roceived in oppos I RNj~ IR N~N~'AL. ~A..~1-N ~- T ~~~ That the Anahelm Cfty Pianning Commfssfon has rEViswecl the praposaE and ~ Pormet No. f(1 G8 fs adequate jtA D rvle asf~ hR ~~ufred approved in connectlon wfth Conditianal Use environmental ~ocumentation in corinection wn~ that it hassconsfdered~ the Negative~Decl~a ation~ oget e~ fnd~pendont jurlgement of the lea~ ~~ency a wfth ~ny comments recefved durin~ a publi ~ roi~'+~e o~ ubstantial fev denCe that ~hehproject w111hhavei a ~tudy and any comments r~ceiveci that thA e signiticant effect on tho vnv(ronm~nt. N~W, THER~FORE, BE IT RE50LVED that the Anmheim City Planning Commission does hereby amend Resolution M~. PC77-258 as iollows: -1- PC95-1 ~4 CR2512~7M.WP ?;; ~. ~ (~,) Madify Candittan No, 2 to read: ~~~, That subJ~ct Co~d~tlon~l llse Permit shall terminato on Nuv~mber 21, 1y96.'~ (b) Adds the following nAw condition: ^ at the recant{y installed s~+tel~ito c11sh shall be rolacated ar scrAOned in accordanao wfth Zoning 3. Th Cuc1e requlrements within a perio~ of thlrty (3~) d~ays THE ~OREGOING RESOLUTION was adoptocl at the Planning Co-nmisslon moetin9 of October 16, 1995, • ~J ~(„J ~ ~ ~ NING C MMIS ON ~~ WQMAN, A bl-IF6M CI'1'Y ATTEC~T: , ~, r ~ ~~ a' `~-~ :~-~~ .--`~`' CiTY)PLANNING OMMIaSIQN SEG~~ qFiY ANAI-IEIM STATE t~~ ~A~~FORNIA ) C~UNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. C~TY OF ANAH~IM ) I Margarfta Solorio, Secrotary of thQ Anah~im Cay m~ge inq af° hd }Anaheim City bF ~nning that th~ f~regofn~ resolution was passed and adoptetl a Commfssion held on dctober 'l~, 1995, bY the follovuing vote of the members theroc~f: MISSIONERS: D~S~~N~~K~ ~OYDSTUN, BRISTOL, H~NNIN~aER, MAYER, t~IESSE, P~RAZA AYES: COM NUE~: COMMI~SIQNERS: NONE ABS~N7: GONiMiSSIQNERS: ;~~t~'c~~ay of _ ~L ~~-~ _~ IN WITN~SS WN~RG4F, I havd herounto sat my hand tl~is ~___ 1995. !,Q" SECRETARY NAHE M CITY LANNING COMMISSION PC95-134 -2-