Resolution-PC 95-148~
~
A RGSOLU'fiON ~FO~DITIONAL U3EI P RMI7 NO 3&13 BEI GiIANTED
7WqY pEf'i'tlC~N F4R C
WHEREAS, tho Anaheim Clry Planning Commissio~~ did receive a vAritied I'etition~ for ',
Ganditionai tJse Permft tor c~rtaln real property situated in the ~~ty of ilnahofm, ~County of Clrr~nge, State ,
of C~iifornla, describad as: i,
pARCEL C, IN Tl~IE GITf nF Ap~C~ ~MAPUF! E N OOK~48, ACiE~ OF' '
CALIFORNIA, A5 SWOWN ON A
PARCEI. MAPS, IN TH~ OFFIC~ ~F YNE COUN7Y R~CCORDER OF SAID
CnUf~lTY• '
WHER~AS, tho Cfty ~lanning Cnmmissrton n diC °of ~ duplubllc:~hea Ir ng ~ ~ g beon cfuly
in tho Clty of Ana he im a n N o v e m b e r t 3, 1~ 9 5 a t 1:~ 0 p
iven as r9qui~ed by law and in accordance with the pr$ vl~i~n p~~~og~d~ ae~~t Q al CU e' p~m~t and tto
~1
18.03, to hear an d c o n s i d a r e v i d B n G e f o r ~ n d a g a
Invostigate and make tindings and recammendati~ns in connectlan thoraw ft h; ~n d d~ b itsalt
VVHER~.AS~ s~aid Commis.ionnot ail ev ~ence and epoKs o~r~~d at satd ear ng, dog ffnd
and In its bahalf, ~nd after due conside~at
and detormine tha fc~llowing faCts:
1. That the propose~! use 1s ProPe~ty ~ rmtt ~xhaC s on a eni e~sting drtve-t roughh~fast ood
~,nahoim Municipat Code ~ectlon 18.44.050.3Q0 to po P
restaurarn. '
2, Tttat the prop~sed usa wllt not adversely affe~t~thb~a~l~~~n $~ b{ect p operty has ~Pera ed
development of the arQa fn which k Is proposeti to be oca
as a drhre•through rest~i~rant since June i97a, amer seating or r!~g g are ~or custome~s~er ice caP~-citY~
use only and does not in~rease tha ovorall cu~to
3, Tt-at the 3ize and 3hape af the site for 1 nenta~to t 0 partlcular areat nor o"~ t~~c~e,
development af the proposed use in a manner not detr lans cnm wkh all requirod site development
henlth, safety, t~nd 9enera~ `Ne~fare; and that the proposed P P~Y
standards of the underiying CL "~nmmorciat, Umiced" Zone;
4, 7hat the t~f(tr, gere~ated by the propo ed ~~fficl in the ~ae~Q ~n ui'~duc~ burdan upan :he
sVests and highwaYs dRS~9n~d 8nd improved ta ca ry
5. Th~t tho granting of thd conditlons~l use pormft, unc~or trie c~ndittor.~ Imposed, wil! nat be
detrimentsal to the peace, health, safety and generel ~velfare of the citlzens o? the C-ty of Anaheim,
g. That nn nne Qidir,~ted thoir presence at said pubHc hoa~in~ In oppositfon; and that no
correspondence wax racei~ed ~n +~Ppogklon to the subject pot~tio+ti.
PC~S •148
-1-
CE~2535DM.WP
+~;
~ ~FI. ORNIA~IRAhJ ~~J~S~.~1~~~' F~ glNt~: The Plannin~ Directar or I~is
authorixed r~pres~ntative has determinad th~-t the pro{~osed proJoct falls wi thin th~o deFl~niteg~r~'~callyaexe'mpt
Exempti~ns, Clasa 1(e)(2), as definod in the 5tate EIR Gulde{Ines and is, e~~fore,
from tha raq~irament to p~eparo an EIR.
N4W,1'NEREF~RE, BE IT RESOI.VED that tho Anaheim Ciry Planning Commission does
h~reby grant subJoct Petftlon for Condl~lonal Use Permit, upon the foilowin~ conditlons whict~ era hereby
rer~ uisite to tho propnoad use af the subJect proparty in orcier tc~ prpsnrve th~
found to be a noGesaary p q
safety and gener~~ waltaro ~f the Cftizens of the City oF ~lnahelm:
t. Th~t prior to the Issuance of a buildin~ perm(t, ~ detaUod landscape p~an shall be submittoci ta tho
i aning D(vislon for roviow and approval.
2. 7h,at any new parking lot Ii~gWt~ingrom'adjacent I e~siden ial p m( p~ ~e~$ maln4ained in a manner ao as
ta be dlrected or orientod Y
3, T~at a~eo In the amount af twenty h Ci ~nf Anah$eim~ o,r sewer capacitynmit gatpon.sp~~are fee: of
rew buildinfl area ~hall be pald to t e ty
4. That subJoct property shall be deve~loped ~ ebitione~iand which plana A ehonl file wi h heCfPlann~ng
s u b m i tt e d t o t h A C i ry o f A n a h g i m y P
Department marked Exhiblt Nos. 1 throuflh 4.
5. That there st-ali not be any driv~way on Bruce Street.
6. That thh petftianer sliall submtt a lsett~~ordable apartmg it comp ex with `wal eirs on subJec propertY
(permittin~ an 85-unk senior citize
and adja~ont propertlea).
7. Ytuat prior to iasu~nce of a'~uildinq po~mit or withln a perioc! of one (1) Year from the date of thi~
roso4ution, whichever occurs flrst, Cn omidete sa~~ cond~~Q s m~Y be1S~~nR~ in ac~c da cepwith
with. Extenslons for furthor time to .. p
Seation 18.03.Q90 of the ~tnahelm Municipal Caie•
8. 7hat p~lor to fina! building and ztinlnq ins~eGtions, Condition Nos. 2 Anci 4, ab~ve•mentianed, sha~~
ba complied wfth.
9. That appravat of thls applicatlon constitutes appraval of the proposeci request only tn tho extertt that
it complte~ with ~he Anal~efm Municip~l Z a~ing~~Qdn o~ ~4ngs asr o compilancs o~a~pro F o the
r e g u l a t l ~ n a. A p p r o v~ l d o a s n o t i n c i u d e y
request regardin~ any other ~ppllcabid ordlnanco, regulatlon or requ iremen t.
8E IT FURTHER RESQLVED that the Anatieim Cfty Pl~nning Comm~sa bn d~e,ns~ie~ncQ w~
arv~ detRrminn that adoptlon of thls Resolt~tian is ~xpressly predicatod upo~ti app~
;~ch and ~Il ot tha condltbns horein~bovflna~ ud ment of iany court ot ampotent jurl~dict onh thon ~thla
declared inv~lk1 or unenforceable t~y the 1 9
Fiosolution, and any app~ovals lierein contafr~od, shall be deemed null anc! void.
.2. p(;95-148
~ ,,
;~~,
THt~ FL7REGaING R~SO~-UT~4N Was ~doptod at the F
N~vemae~ 13, 1995 ~ ,p _,
r1Z~''"y
Commisslon meettng oi
CI~lAIRMAN, PRs~ TEMPOR ,
ANAhIEIM GI~Y PU~NNING COMl1A1SSi0N
ATTEST,
~_....-~~ ~: •~v`.~'
5EC -RCTAR , AMAi-IEIM CITY NLAN ING GUMMISSlON
S7M7E OF ~AUFORNIA )
COUNTY l~F Oi~AN~~ ) ss•
CITY OF I~NAHEIM )
dp hereby ~ertify
I, Edith l,.. Harris, 5ecretery' of tha Anshelm CItY Plannin~ Commission, p~~nnin
that the fpregoln~ res~~lution v~~s p~s 5~Ath ~ol°4wing~t~~ e of thA~membe a h~ eof ~~ 9
Commission held on ~l~v8mber 13, ~~ Y
AYES: C~MNIISSIONEFi5: I30STWlCK, BOYDS~'UN, CiRiSTflL, HENNINGER, MESSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMIS~~ONER~: hIONE
P~BS~NT: COMMI~-SIOiJ~RS: MAYER,
ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~/~, d~Y af ~"`~
IN W
1995. ~ .
P ~ ~%
S~CRET`ARY, ANAHElM CITY LA~N~NC COMMISSiON
-3- PC95-148