Resolution-PC 95-33.J ~~~ '~I 1.
~I~~~ ~
RE~OL.UTLON N~,1.,rP~e.Q~.~
A HESOLUTION OF '~HE ANAH~IM CITY Pi.l~1NNING COMMISSION
THAY PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE P~RMIT N0. 37a9 BF GRAN7GiD
WMEREAS, the Anahelm City Pl~nnin~ Commiss(on di~d recefve a v~rlf(ecl Petitlon for
Condillonal Use Permlt fnr certt~l~7 re~l proporty situ~ted in the Cfty of ~lnaheim, County ~f Or~nge, State
af Califorrola, described as:
PARC~4 4, OF ~1 MAP FILED IN BOOK 177, ?ACaES 28 ANl7 29 OF PARC~L
fNiAPS, HCCORDS OF OR/1NGG CUUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the C(ty Planning Commisslon d(d hald a public hear(ng at th~ C(vic Centor
in thc~ City of An~heim on Marr,h 20, 1995 at 1:30 p,m., notice of safd pubUc h~aring having been duly
g(ven as requ(red by !aw and in accordanc9 with the provisions of 4he Anahaim Municipal ~ode, Chapter
18.03, ta h~ar and considar avidence fnr and agt~(nst said proposed conditional uso permit a~d to
investic~ate and make fina~ngs and recommendations in connectlori therewith; and
WH~REAS, safd Commissfon, after due Inspecticm, invostigatlon and ~tudy made by Itself
and in Its b~ehaif, and after due aonsideration ai all Qvidence and roports offered at said hearing, daos find
and dotermina the followinQ facta:
1. That tha proposed use fs pr4~Qriy one far which a conditlonal uso permft is authorized by
Anaheim Munfaipal Code ~e~t(on 18.fi1.050.605 to permit ~ business offico (n the ML tLimited Industrial)
ZOng;
?.. Tha~ the pruposed use will not adversely affect the adJoining land uses and the growth and
developrnent of the arva in which it is pruposed to be lacatad;
3, i hat tha size and shape of the ~ite for tho propased use is adoquato to allow the full
development af tho proposed use In a manrier not dotrimenta! to tha particular aroa nor to the poace,
health, safety and ge~eral welfare because, although thers will be customer senrice activities taking ptace
at this Iocatfon, the majority of activtty will inv~lve administra4ive and wareh~use functions; and that the
number of available parking spacas is 61 ~'o m~re than requ(red by Cocle (G3 s~x'~cos re~u(red; 102 spaces
proposeci);
4. That the traffic gene;ated by the proposaci uso wiil not impc+s~ an undue burdQn upon the
streeis and hfghways dESigned and impruved to carry the traffic in thQ area;
5. Yhat the flrantfnc~ af tha conditionai use pormit under tho conditions imposed will not be
cietrim~ntal to the peace, health, s~fety and general welfare of tho cltlzen: crt the City of Anaheim;
6. Thac r~o one ind(cateci their pr~sonce at said public hesrlnq in appasitton; and th~t no
correspondenae was receivecJ in opposition to the subJect p~tit(o~.
CR2333MS.WP -1- PG'95•33
~~,
~~~Ay~NVIRONMF..N'~8,1~.44~.A4~LY,ASZ~-NQ.lN~i~ 7hat th~ Anaheirn City Planning
Commission hms revlewed the propos~l to permit a businoss office in the ML. (Limitod Industrial) Zane ~n
a rectan~ularly-shaped parcol of lancf consisting of appr~ximat~ly 1.34 acres havin~ a fror~ta~e of
apprUximately 274 feet ~n the eask sido of Bra~hor StrHet with a maximum depth of approximetely x00 feet,
being loc~tod 810 f~et n~rth of the certerline of l,~ Palma Avenue ~and further descrlhod as 14q0 N.
Brasher Street; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon firiding that tho declaration r~flects
the fr~dependent Judgement c>f tho lead a~tency and that (t h~s r,onsiderod the Negatlva Declarati~n
togother wfth any camments receivod ~ecei gd that there is na s bstantlal ov denGe th tn he project~will
of tha initi~l study ~nd any coniments
have a significant off~ct on tho environrr~ent.
NOW, TMEREFORE, 6E IT P,ESni.V~D that the Anahoim Ctty Planning Commission daos
hereby ~rant subJeat Petition fUr Cie d~tt~n~ I U~se~~~ruso~ofpheh ubject property ini ~ de to p e e`rveehe
fou~d t4 ~ie a necessary prerequl~ p R
safety and gene;al wsifare oi th~ Citfzens of tha City of Anahoim:
1. That a pian sheot far solid waste stnrage and cullection and a pi~n ior recycling sht~ll bo ~ubmitted
ta the Department of fJlaintenance for revfew and ~pproval.
2, That prior to (ssuancQ af a building perrnit, th~ appro~~riato trafifia signal asses ~ment teo shaii be paid
to the City of Anaheim in a~ arrrount as ~stablished by City Councfl Resolution.
3, That subJect prnp9rty shall be develnped sub~tdntially in accorda~ce with plans and sp~cificatinns
subrrsitted to the City of AnaP~eim by the patitioner and which plana are on fila with the P~anning
Department marked Exhibit Nas. t and 2.
4. Tti~t pr(or to cosr-mencement of the activity authorized by this resolutfon, or prfor to issiaance ot a
building permit, or with(n ~ perlocl of ane (1) year from tl~e cJato of this resoluti~~n, which~v~er occurg
first, Candition Nos. 1 and 2,~aa o~eem~anted in ac~lorcia cemwith S~ctUon~ 8 03 03p of th9 An~he m
~o complstQ safcl conditions y 9
Municipal Coda.
5. That prior to commencement ~ir th C~nd'Rio + No.I3, abo~e-mentianfQd, sht~ll be cofmpl~led with r~~n~
ins{~ections, whichevar occurs ,
Ei, Tiiat approval of thl3 ap{~lic;ation constitutes approva! of they ropased ~~Cable CityyS at ~nd Fede ~
it complles with the Anaheim QViunicipal 2orsing Code and an other app r~val nf the
regulations. Approv~l does not include ~ny action or tindings as to cornpliance or app
request rea~rding any other applicable ordinanc~, regulation ar rPquirem~nt.
8E 17 FUR71-I~R RES4LV~D that the Anah~eim City Planning Cammission doea hereby Find
and determine that acfoptfon of this Reso~ution is expressly pr~ciicated ~an applicanYs ~ompliance wtth
oach and all oE the condltions hc~reinAbove set torth. ~liould any such condition, or any part theraof, ar~
declared inv~f(d or unenforceable ~y then~ ni j~udgr~nenbe ~Q~m~~n~l~and v~ofd~nt juris~.llr.tion, then this
Ra:aolution, and ~ny approvdis herein co ~
-2- PC95•33
+~,
,'i~~
THE FOREGOING ~iESOLU710N was acloptad at tha P~arniing C~mrnissian meeting of
March ~0, ~ J95. / .,~_.,..
,~ ~ , 1..-~,'~[.c..-~.,c..J
GHAIRWO AN ANAhihIM CIT'~ PLAN ING COMiMISSI~N
ATl'EST;
~n.~b
. z__._._..._.
S~CRETARY, A~ EiM ClTY PIANNIIVG COMMISSIrJN
ST~T~ OF GAII~ORNIA )
COUNTY AF aI~ANGE ) ss•
CI'rY OF ANAHEIM )
{, Margarfta So~orio, SecretAry ofi the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commissian, da hereby cortlfy
that the for~a~aln~ resolution was p~SS~ e folio~winptvote of the~m~ be s theroof: he1m City Planning
Commissian held an March 20, ~t9~5, by 9
/~y~g; COMMISSIONEFIS: (3n N~ TUN, CALDWELL, MENNINGER, MAYE~t, M~SSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: N4
ABSENT: CQMMISSIONERS: NONE
VACANCY: ONE SE~1~'
. I h~ve hereunta set my hand this ~~y~~~aY ~f
IN WITN~SS WNERF~P~
, 199~+. .
i J~~.~~~~~ ~---
~,.~t~______
~
SECRETAFtY, L4, AHEIM CI7Y PLANNING CAMMIaSIpN
.~_ PC95-33