Resolution-PC 95-38~ S~ ,
~~~..~~..~.ics~s~
A RESGI.U'fION fJF TW~ ANAHEIM ~'~ ~Y PLANNIN(~ COMMIS310N
APPRC~VING REVIS~D PLANS FOA
~ONL~ITIONAI. USE NEFI~AIT NA, 1374 (REAUVEFiTISE~)
Wf•IERFA~, on Fobruary 5,1973 the Pianning Cammissior~ ~appravad f~onciitlonni Uae Permii
No. 1374 permitting tho following In an existin~ commerclal affice complex at 13GQ S~utli Anaholm
Boutevard In the ML "4lmitc~tf Industrial" Zone:
(~) A non-inclustrial training center; and
(b) Retail dlstributfn~ iirm~, pr(marily serving commerce ~nd Inclustry, with only incidentfll servica
to the ~one~l pubiic; arid
(c) aorvias business firms, including businesa and proFeaslonat offices, prim~rily soNing
oommerce ar~d industry ~vith anly incldental serv(ce to the genoral publlc; and
(d) A.n additlon to a 2-story Qffice bulidin~; and
(e) Waivers of permitted use~ and minimum number of parking ~{~aces; and
that no furthor actlon was talten by the City Cauncll.
WHFREAS, ~iesolutlan No. PC7~-32, adoptod in connectlan wlth subJect c:onditlunal use
pormii, contains two conL4tlpns (Nas. 9 and 10) which specNy that es~ch proposod use be s~~bmitted to the
~lanninp Departmontrkon'es~avai~lable;pand that su~ch p opo a~s m y al oil~e submittod tortho Piann g
whethor ~uffici~nt pa q
Commiasion far a doterrnir,~ation.
WHER~15, the petitioner has submltted revised pi~ns to estabtiah a court repr~rtin~ cAllege
in tieu of the prev(ously approved non-Industrlal ira(nin~ center; and that sald plans shuw that tha originally
approved 2•story, 15,600 sq.K. oHice building addit(on will not be conStructed, that the pro~x-3ed court
repo~ting cAllege wiil be lo :ated In the 2-story 1 J,300 sq:ft. building (west building) and that tho ea.st bulSding
(16,8U0 sq.ft.) u~ill b~ used for individuai off(cos.
WF+EREAS, tho ~Ety Planning Commiss(on did hold a public he~ring at the Civic Center ln
the City of Anaheim en March 20, 1995, at 1:30 p.m., notice nf said pu~IfG hearing havln~ been duly glven
Chr~ ter 18.03
as requirod by law and in sccordance with tt~o provis(ons of the Anahefm Munlcipa! Code, p ,
to hear and conside~ ~e~inns in connect~io`n th~ wtpth~and thatvsaid public hea ingi as cioMinusd athe
findings and r~com e
Aprfl 3, 1995 Pian~ing Com~n(ssion meettng; ~ncf
WHEREAS, sa(d Cammission, ~fter clue Inspoction, irn~est(gation and stUdy mada by ttself
and in its behalf, and atter due co~sideration of all evidence Rnd reports of#ered at s~W ha~rU~g, does find
and dstormine the f~llowtng facts:
1. That the p~tftlonor has submitted a letter reparding operatlon of the prnposed court
reporting college (west buliding):
Maximum students: 200
Haur~ of op~retion: Nionday thraugh Frfday: ~~a~m' m ~op n OQ p.m.
'Tu~sday through 7hursday: 6:00 p.
-1- PC:95~38
CR2341 MS.wp
1 , Y• ~%.
l i~
2. That Wlanning Dep~rtmont ~taaWn and 21 t tidv~-galln~) shrubs but ~h thsalc! i~ndscapi g h~as
fandscaping consists c~f eight mature trAee, ~
not be~en maintalnod on a r~gular basls;
a. Thet eliminatlan of the prevlousiy ~ppr~ved 2•stoN, 1b,600 sq.ft. ~ffice buildin~ ~dditlo~
renders the overall prr~Ject loss inttms~ in t~rms ~f use ~nd parkinp demand;
d, That the proposed caurt roporting collogR wlll rasuit in an improved parking supp~Y 1~
Gomparison to ~he parkinq wQ~ver which ~w~7~P~~g~o ~ inally o proved~ and 9 proposed requos4 wlll attaln
g8°~6 of the Code requlred parkiny vorsu fl
5. That no one ind(catad thelr prc~sence at said publlc h~a~in~ in oppasition; and that no
cnrrespandence was received fn oppGSi~~~n to the subJect patition.
~ALIFORhIA_ F~__~.VIR .n~lM ' T~A a~~~~~-~~' That the Anaheim City Pl~nning
Cornmissian has revfewad tho propo~l to establish y court repoC i~~nof lanld~COnsfat ng~of app oximat ly
approved non-industrial trai~tiing centar on an irregularl -shaped pa
2.3 acres, havin~ an appruximate frontage of 260 feot an the aast slde of Anaheim Baulevr~rcl, ha~~ing an
approxfmate depth of 320 feet, bein~ located approxim~tely 1?_5 feet north of tho cent~~rpve thel~Ne~;ative
and further doscribvd as 1360 South Anahgim Bouievard: and da~s heroby app
Declttration upan finding that the declar I~a~t(an tct etheriw h ai~i.~yr ommen se ece ted dur ngghe pul~l ~
tnat it has con3idar~d the NeQative Doc o9
roviow process and further flrrding on the baais af th~ inltl~al stur:y and any cdmments reaeivet1 that thera
is no substaMial evidence that the proJect will hav~ a significant e(fect on the ern-ironment,
NOW, 7H~REF~RE, SE IT RESnLVED th~.c tt~a An~heim Clry Planning Cammi~,sinn dAes
heroby determine that tho propo~ed court ~eportin~ c~lloge fs In substantisl conformanco with tho non-
industrial trafning aenter originally approved under Gonditional Use Permit No. 'i37a;
And tt~at Resol~tion No. PC73-32 is heroby amended to add the foilowing conditlons:
12. That tho existing IandscapU~q shali~ub~un ~ io~ ~~ontng ivisfan ot he Planfng Der~artment for
thAt final landscape plans shali bg
revlew and approvai by the Pianning C~mmisslon as a"Repons and Recommendations" ftAm.
13. That the tot~l enroilment shall not exceed two hundred (20Q) st~xients.
14. That the proposed offico uses permitte~d in the east buiiding shall be Iimited to thA fallowing:
(1) P~cc~unting - Bookkeeping, Ct'A F(rms or tomporary CPA Flrms
(2) Advertising
(3) Appraisors
(4) Attomeys
(g) Banks Ku~hles, Etc.
(g) Brokors ~ Reat Esta~e, Business Oppo
(~ Business System Companies
(f3) Communicatio~ Ccrosultants
~~j Com~uter Analysis Firms
(10) Credit Repurting Agencies
(11) Deslgnors - tndustrSal, IMerior, Graphfa
(12) D~velopmerY Companies
(13) FRCility Maintonanc~ and F~anning
-2- PC9.°i-38
:~ ,;~.
(14) InsurancA C~mpanlea/Agencles
(•15) Inventary Servicea
(16) Leesing Cam{~anles
(17) Man~gemont Consultants/Companies
(1 S) Marketing Re~earch
(19) Pc~raonnol A~encles
(20) Qualiry Cpntral Analysis
(21) Sales OffiGes (which serva tho indt~striai area)
(22) Secretarial and ~usiness Servicas
(23) Any ugo permltted under Zoning Cucie~ Sectlan 18.61.020 "Permitt~d Primaiy Uses and
Structures," subJec:t to ~II oondition~ af said S~ction.
t5. Tha~t tho nwner of subJect properry shall submit a lotter raque.~tirig terminsation of Corulitianal Use
Pormit Nu. ~4a9 (to pormit a 2~0-untt singla roam occupancy "SRO" residentfal hotal) to the Zon..~g
Division.
1 fi. 7hat subJect property ahall be develop~d substantially i~ accordr~nae with pians arxl ~{aocifications
submftted ta tho City of Anaholm by tha petttione~ a~d which plans are on ffl~ with ~he Planninc~
Dep~rtrnent m.arked Revia(on No. 1 oF Exhibit Nas. 1 and 3, and the two floor plans f~r the front
(west) building submftted at the April 3, 1995 pubiic hearing and sa-dated.
17. That pr~oc to comm~ncement ~f the activity autho~Ized by thi4 resulution, or prior to issu~ncs of
a builcling permft, or whhin a poriod of ano (1) y~ar from the date of thts resolution, wi~ichf~~~er
~ccurs f(r;~t, Condli(on No.15, abov9-mer~tlon~ci, shall be c~mplied with. Extensians far fuKtier t~mo
to camplete sa(d ~canciit(uns may be greMed In accordanc~ wfth Sectfan 18.0~.090 of the A,naheim
Municipai Code.
18. '~hat prior to commencemont of the Activity authorix~d by tri13 re3olutlon, or prior to prior to
issuance of a centficate of accupancy, or prior to flnal buildin~ and zonin{~ Inspect(ons. whiahever
occurs first, Condit(on Nos. 1?. a~xi 16, ~bove-m~ntian~, shall be compliod wfth.
1 g. That approval of this application c~nstitutes a~-pravai af the praposed requASt only to ~ha extent
that it compiles witti the Ar~ahefm Munfcipal Zontng Cade and any other applfCable Ciry, State anci
Federal regulations. Approval daes not lnclude any a~~tion or finciings as to com~{fance or approval
of th~ request regarding +~iny other applicabie ordlnance, re$ulation or requirement.
6~ IT FUR'TM~H RESOLVED that thr~ Anaheim City PlAnning ~:ommission does her9by find
~nd deterrnine that adoption o~f this Resalutian is exp~e.RSly predfcgted upon epplicant's Compllanco wlth
each and all of tho conditions h~refnabove set forth. 5hould any such conditian, or any parc thore~f, be
declared lnval(d or un~er~forceable by th~ fin~l judgmertt of any couri c~ competern Jurisdfction, then this
Resaluilon, and any approvals herein contained, shail ba deemed nui! ~nd vvid.
THC FOREGOINC aESOl.UT14N was adopte~l at th~ Pl:~nning Commission maetin~ aF
Anril 3, 1995. / f ~i~r~Z'i~.t"~J
.C/~t~ -,~~
IRWO AN ANAMEI~IA ClTY UINNIN CG OMrJIISSiOf~
ATTES7: «
1
SECR A, ANA?~EiM C! Pl'Y LAl~1MINC3 COMM SSI IQN
~
~. PCJ5-38
,r
{~I~il
STA7E OF GALIFORNIA )
GpUNTY ~F OR~INGE ) ss.
ClTY AF ANAHEI~JI )
1, MargRrita S~lor!a, Secr~ry~n~t a~ppe~ ~a A~ry~~~i~g uCoh~ ~AnaholmpClty F'lann~l g
that the f~regoing resolutian wes pas
Commissl~ri rield an ~pril 3, 199~, by the folic~wing va4o of tho membt~rs thareof:
AYES: COMIMISSlANFRS: F10YDSTiJN, CALDWELL, HENIdINGER, MAYER, MESSE
N~ES; COMMIS51aNERS: NnNE
ABSENT; COMMIS510N~RS: BU5TWICK, PERl~ZA
tN WITNESS WWEREOF, I have hereunto 3et my hand this ~~ ~~Y nf ~^ ~
1995. • .
- ,RE'T,".`! (, A AHEIM CITY F'l~1NNING ~OMMISS{ON
SC~'
~ I~C95-36