Loading...
Resolution-PC 95-42~~ ~ .~F~~.~J7~.N....NS?~P~9~ -aa. A RESOLUi'ION ~F 7HE ANAHEIM CITY PI.ANNING CONiMISSION RECOMPVIENDING THAt' CITY COU~VCIL AMEND ~~RTAIN CONDI710NS f7F ~1PPROVAL OF ORDINANCE N~J, 5296 ADOPTED IN CA~INECTION WI1'W SPECIFIC PIAN N0. 90-3 "CYPRESS CANYON" WHER~AS, SpACific Plan No. 9A-3 (SP90•3) for the 697•acre Cypres~ Canyon Speciflc Plan (including Z~ning anc! Developmerit 5tanclards and a Public Facflities Plan) was approved by the Cfty Co~nr,ll on Aprll 21, 1992; ~nd that City Council suk~sec~uenUy adoptnd Ardinance No. 5296 to amond the Zaning Map to lnclude Specific Plan SP90~3; and that the Gypress Canyon Specffic Pisn proNides for the development of up to 1,620 dwelifr~g units, a acres of c~mmerc(~I uses, an elementary school, a potential high sci~ool, a fire statlon $Ite, an etectrical substation sftc~, a neic~hborhaod park, and op~en space; arid WHEREA~, Conditfon No. 16 of Ordinance No. 5296 currently ~tates the fallowing: "~I B. Notwithstandii~g any provision of tha co~ditions of approval containec~ herein ta the contrary, the propQrty owner/developAr may process and (upon ~pproval fn accord~nce with the Subdivisian Map Act and Title 17 of the ~nahefm Municipal Coda) record a traat ar parcel map for the ilrnit~ed pur~,e ,~g,rZv,Qyanc~ wlthaut com~lying whh any of th~ conditions of approval c~ntained her~in (except as ~~~rt~: J 4n tl-~i~ condition af approval) which, by ttiefr terms, must be camplled with prior to submittal ~,~ ~a,r ~ pplicatton for, approval of, ar recordation of, a tentative or fin~l tract or parcef map prov(ded: 7he tract or parcel man shall contain a note to the ~ffoci th~t (i) the map is being fil~d for coiweyance purposes only and will havs no public improvement requfremei~ts; (ii) no buildinp permits, oxcept for public facliftios, ar~ to be (ssued fQr the lots or paicels created by this map; anc+, (fii) the rocording pf a subseqiaent map is requ(red before buildin~ permits can be issued, and ~n unsubordinatgd covenant in a farm approved by ihe City Attorney is recorclod agalnst thP entlre sitA roflecting the foragoing; 2. Req~.iirements 2, 3 and 4 in Condition 1A, above, shAli be met; (These rsqulremenis lnclude the follow/ng: 2. An unsubord/na[~d covenaM ln the form approved by tha CiryAttorney is recorded agalnsf the ent)re slie to th~ effact thR~ the property owner/developer and all successlve own~rs af all patfa~s nf the slie agree: (1) not to conte~i the formatlon of any of the speclal distrlcts, beneflt dlstrlcts or other /lnancing mecl~anlsms set forth elsewhere in these conditlons of approual; (f1) ~o aoaperate fully in ihe f~rmat/on pro~ess; and (iJl) to resenie only the rlght ta confes~ tl~e spraad or amouni of any assessment ege/nsc a partlculer p~rtlon of the property; 3. lrrovocable oflers of dedlcaHon, lncfu~ding necessary constructlon end adjoining sl~p~ easements, for rlgh~-of-way~ f~r a!! ~rterial hlghway.s a~~d all trRil, ,nark and other pub/!c facflJty sltes (/fre stailon and eloctrlcai substatlon slies) ldentifled !n thesa candltlons of appr~val arQ rnado prlor to the approval of sald fract or p~rceJ map; provided that such lrrgvocable off~r~ shall lnclude a m~cl~anlsm !or edjusiing leyal de~c:rlpilnns as thE prer,lSa /ocaflons are determined durln~J developrnent; 4. 7 he tract or parce! rr~ap ofhenylse com~lles wlfh the Subdlvl~lon M~p Acf end ride 17 of the Anaholm Munlcfpal Code.) Cp2352MS.WP -1- PC9S-~42 ~i Y~ ~~~A1il~. ~ ~i ~r 3, Prlor to taritative m~tp ap~~raval, the property ~wner/devel~per shall c~mply with thH follawing conditions of approval (tho corresponr~!ng mitig~tion measura numbor is in parenthesis): 2, 5, 7, ~~, 35 (if epplfc~blo), 112 (9•20), 130 (3-12), 160 (J•23), 161 (9-24), 174, 178 (9-17), 205 (S•12), 223, 224 an~ 2U2; 4, That p~ior to fin~l map appraval, the proparty uwner/developar shall subinlt ~ 8ackbone Infrastructur~ and Financ(ng'~len (tho Plan) preparai tn the satisfactiari af the City Ent~ineor for review and ~ppraval ~y th0 Clty Engine~r. The action oi th~ Cfty Engingnr shall be ~ub~ect to appeal or review by tho Planning Commiss(on within ton (10) d~ys follawing the dato of such actlon. Any subse~u~nt chan~es ta the Plan shall b~ subJect to the review and approval ~f the City ~~7gir~eor. a. TI}o Plan shall Idontify backbone infrastruct~~re Iocatlons, public sacility sftes and est~bli~h a fin~ncing mechanis-n(s) to implement said plans. b, S~id plan ,~hall (nclude provislans far the foilowing items: (1) 5pecific timing for studfes, phas(i~g, bonding, completian, etc. Timin~ sh~ould be tied to final map a~~rov~l or Issuance af building pormits when passible and the dA~artment responsible 6or verffyfn9 completion of aach raquirement shall be identified; (~) Reciprocal grmding and access agreements; (3) ~ompliarice with CQnditions of Approval Nos. (the corresponding mitiqatfon measure numb~r is in pareEithesis) 1?.9 (3-11), 206 (8-01), 208 (8-02), 209 (8-03), 210 (8-Q4), 211 (8-05), 212 {5-06), 213 (g-07), 215 (5-10~, 221 ~nd 233; (4) A monitoring report shall ~e submitted to the rity Engine~r an a sami- annual basfs (~lanuary 1~nd July 1) for review by all applicable d~partments; and, (5) Th~ approved Plan ahalf be distributed to all dopartments and become part of the Specific Alan document so all requirements are centraliy located. Any subsequent ~pproved changes shall also be distributed to all departmonts. r,. An ttnsubordinateci covenant in a form approved by the City Attorney shall be recorded a~ainst th~ entfre site r~qufring the property owner/developer and ail successivo owner~ of ~II portionc of th~ site to participate in the lmnlemontation of and b~ subJocs ta the prpvls(on3 of thc~ Pla~. ~. Prior to final m~p approval, the property owner/developer shall comply with 1ho followinc} co-~ditions nf approval (ttiose conditions may be satisflerl as part af or separate from the ~ackbone infrastruct~ure and Financin~ Plan - tho coResporidin~ mitlgation ;~~easurs number is (n ;~~renthesfs): 32 (If applicabla), 35 (if a~pifcable), 38, 3~, 40, a3 (2-01), 8a, ~G (9-01}, 90 (~-03), 93, 95 (9~~ 9), 9G, 97, 90, 11 a(9-27), 121 (9-06). 152 ~9-29), 154, 155 (~J-10~, 156, 157 (8-11), 159, 1 Ht (9-13), 1 f3$ (6-11), 190 (6-C17), 192 (6•12), 1~J (F3-15), 200 (8-14), 202 (8-13) t~nd 231." _2. PC95-42 ,;a~ ,'4 ~~. WN{~REAS, the property ownor sub~ ~ n~ ce No 5?.96 n n der o p ocass enta i e Parcel requea t iny a n a m e n d m e n t t o C a n c l l t l o n N o. 1 S o f Map No. 94•?q~ for the convoyance of a 1 a-a h~ ~xf~ In~fOwl~Ro k Minl g Company's ope ation aroa; a d 3; t ha t s u b J e c t, p a r a o l i s l a c a t e d a d j a c e n t t o t e 9 that s~id letter indicates that in canducting thei q,ssue~the~rr~oi~ertY owner shes ta convey su ~ect parcel parcol and, in order t4 sottl~ thig encroachman , p ta nwi Rock; and WHEREAS, iho procedure to amend spec~Pic plans is sot farth in Chapter 18.03 "Zonin~ Prs~cedures-Amee~dments, Conditionai User Permits r~ncl Variances" ~nd Section 1~.93.050 "Spec~fic ~'len Procedure" af the Anaheim Municipal Cnde; and WF{~~EAS, the Cfty Pianning Commisslon did holc! a public hcaaring at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 17, 1995~ at i:30 p.m., notice af safd public hearing having been duly ~iven as raquired by law anci in accordance with the p ai~ ~~ o p~ amendmentuand pol nv~estigate atnd 1m ke to hear a~~d con3ider eufdence for and agains p p findings and recommendat(ans in conneation therewith; and WF-IEREAS, said Cr~mmission, afterl evidenc ~an'dtreportatoffereci at said he ng daes find ~nd in its behalf, and after due consirl~rat{on nf al and determine the following facts: 1. 7hat the properry proposed for the SRecific Plan Nn. 90-3 amendment t~as unique sito characteristics su~h as tnpography, focatian or surroundings which are e~hanced by ~pecial iand use and development standards. 2, That the Specific Plan, as amended, ~~Gpu~elines cfontained the ein.pQlicfes af the General Plan and with the purposes, s4andards and land us g 3, Thdt the Specific Plan, ~s amend~d, results in developm~nt of desirable character which wiil be compatlble with existing and propoSed development !n the surrounding nefghborhood. q.. That the Speciffc Plan, as amencJed, aantribtjtes :o a balanc~ c-i land uses. 5. That tho Specific Plan, as amended, respQCts onvlronmental and ~gsthetic resources consistent wlth economic realities. ~, That ~pprov~l of subject reque t m~~Na.fl3~of the St ff Rieport'to theSP anning Commi s on L'oun t y C a s e N a. ' 1 t 9 0 1 1 a s r e f o r e n c e d i n ~ d~ted Apr(I 17, 1995. 7. That twv (2) peop~o indicated their presence at satd publia hoasing in oppos~tion; and that correspondence w~s r~ceived ln a~position t4 the subJect petltfon. -3- PC95-~2 M; ,~. ~~ ~;yc ~,~`; ~~~ ~~~~~ iT (~1 Ai,{TY A~7 FINp~N~: 1'hat the Anaheim City Planning Carnml~sion has reviawe.~ the praposal and does hee~uirecl envi~ronmental docuymentafti~an~nv~:an oction Impact Report No, 2~8 Is adAquate to sArve as the q ~Nith ttiis roquest upon finding that it refl~cts th ~ommontse oceiv~d hatttherel isl nodsubstantiF11evldence finding on the basis of the initiat stuciy and any that the project will have a sigritficant Affect an the environmont. NOW, THER~FORE, 8E 17 ~ ~~i an etNo. 52,9G, dop ed lfn coi nection witt S~pec~fic P~an hereby reGOrr~mend that City Councll ama No. 9U-3, by ~~ding iho fol{owing new condition; 1 C. Notwithstanding any provision af the conditi~ns af ~pproval c~ntafnod her~in ta th~ cantrary, the prapert.y ownar/d~v~;loper may process and (upun approval in accorda~ce wlth tho Sub~ivision ~; Map Act and '~ttle i7 ~f the er aheff M~nicipai Cnde f rAI o~d ~~~hoM~ omplyirzg2withfanY of purpase of conveyance in •r~ .~.. th~ conditions of approval contained~hi„ ~ rio~r to psubn itta! of'an happlicatfonnfor,aapproval oficor by their terms, must be complied p rovided: r9cordat(on of, a tentative ar final tract ar parcol map p 1, 7he tract or parcel map shall ~ etta~ment of OC~C Case~No. 71(i9011 a d will ha fan oilpub ic conveyance purp~sos to effec impravement requirements; (ii) r~o buflding permfcs, except for pubilc facilitie~, are to be issued ~ar the lots or parcels creatod by th(s ma~; iii th t G~ ~E~iect qarGel w01 ~o used_f_2 ~val oment rlahts.~ra~.arant@~.; and, (iv) th~ recording oi a op~~ only and no d ~------ rovai subsequent map is requirod before buildin~ permits can be issueci. Prioovgo~t hy~he City of Parcel Map No. 94•2A5, an unsubardinated covenant in a torm app Attorney shaif be reaord~d against ihe entire slte encompassed by Parcei 1 of PHrcel Map N~, ~4-205 reflecting tf~e forqgoing; 2. An unsubordinated covenan! in a farm approved by the City Attnrney sh~.A be rec:orded against tha entire Cypress Car~yon property to the eff9ct that the property owner/developer and all succ~ssivQ owners of all portiqns of the site agree: (i) not to contest the f~rmatian of any of the special districts, benafit districts or ather fin~ncing mechanisms sot forth elsewhere in thess concfitians of approval; (ii) to cooper~le fully in the forn~ailon process; and (iii) to resarve anly the right to cantest the spread or amount af any assessment against a narticular portfon of the nroporty; 3, An ircavacable offer af dedfp i~~~ iQrtionio "St eet D" immediately adjacent~oiP~aceli~ of easemsnts, for right-of-way F ress Canyan 5peciffc Plan boundary shall be Parcel Map Na. 94-205 and within the Cyp made prior to the final Map appruval of Parcel Map t~o. 94-205~ providecl that su~h IrrQVOCable offer shall inci~uda ~n mechanism for adjusting fegal degcriptions a re ~ired bv h it ngJ.neer as the precise IocatlonR are detorm(ned during d~velopment. Street "D" is designatod as a Modffied Hillside Collector H(ghway an tho Circulation Element of the G~eneral Plan with an ultimatA right-of-wa ~o a~ f e~ Q C~ he~nginee ~prordto t e subm tttal of U shall be subJect to th~ reviow and app tY the irrevacable offer of dodication; 4, parcel Map No. 9~-205 shal{ uthervvise compiy with the Subdivision Map Act and Tftle 17 of the Anahaim Municip~l Code; a-~d. PC95•a2 -~4- `w.~,i~ ; ~u~ ~~ ,~, y~, 5, Prfor ta the final map approval for Parcel Map No. 94-2Q5, the property ownerJdevelopor shall compiy witti Conditlon No. 2, as amend~d herein. AND, FU{~7HER, thal the Planning Commisalon hareby also recommends that Condition No. 2 be amend~d in Pts entirAty to read es follaws: 2. Ti~at within sl~dy (60j days ~f the acioption af an ordir~anCe amending the Cypross Canyon Sp~cific plan and prior to the submittal of the final map fur Ptircol Map No. 94-205, tho proparty own~r/clev~loper shall: a. Racord ~n unsubordinated cavenant, in a form approved ~y th~ Gity Attarney, ag~inst the entiro Cypress Canyan praperty acknowl~dginc~ that those conditfons of apprpval set forth herein which require completion of certain tttslcs prior to efth~r submission or appraval of the fir~t tentativA or final parcel or traat map, exclutling Parcei Map No. ~4-205, are tied to said maps f4r nurposes of ~:arry(ng aW completion af the purpos~aR pf tho Specific Plan and are t~ot ne:;essarily based upon tha content of said first map• ` 3~uCCOSSO st and ~assignsr provide t;~at the property owner/deve~op~r sh~all waive far ftself, any obJection to impASitiQn of said condftions upon tlie first tent2tive ar fin~l tract or ~aarce~ map, HXCIUdI-ly p~cL oX~~t 0 3~ d f eS~ et forth (a the Subdivisbon Map Act;~and~ upp~ permitted conditivn~, b, Record an unsubordinated covenar,t, ln ~ form approved by the City Attamey, against Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 94-205 req~iring the propert~~- owner/developer 4o participate and ta waive for fts~lF, its successors and assir~ns, any objeation to participate in t~~e implementation of ail conditians ~of anproval and m(tigatfon m~asures requlriny thP complstion o~ certain tasks prfor to either siabmissian or approval of the first tentative or tin~l parcel ar tract map. Th~ property awnor/developer shall partfcipate in trie fmplementatVon of said conditic~n~ ~ ~ea encomnt ssed by Pa cel~ Map No. 94-205 addr~sses tha ultimat~ development of the a I~ THE FOREGOING RE50~UTIfJN was adoptad at the Planning Commission meetiny of Aprfl 17, ~t J95. ~,.~ ~~ ~ G~~~~'~..J CHAIRWQMI~N, ANAHEIM i'TY PLANNINC~ COMMISSION ATi'ES"f: , . SECRETARY, AN iEiM CITY PiANNING C~JMMiSSION STAT~ OF CALIFQFINlA ) COUNTY OF Q~iANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary ~f tho Anahe(m City Planning Cornmfsaian, do tiereby certify tF~at the for~going resolution was i~$ tn~ faitowin ~voe of the mamt~~ers the ~o ~~~heim City Planning Commissinn held an Aprll 17, 1995, by 9 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK~ gOYQSTUM, HENNINGER, MESSE, PERA~A NOES: COMMISSIOMERS: NONE r~BSENI': COMMISSIUNERS: CALDW~LL, MAYER 1 , i 995. IN WITNESti ~NNEi~EOF, { have her~unto set my hand this ts day of _'~ ~FCq~/~RY, EiM CIIY PIANNING COAAMISSt01V -5^ PC95-;2