Resolution-PC 95-57Lc •l~,
~~ ~ % ~
R~SO TION IVO. PC~J5;;~7_
~ RESOLUTIC)N OF TH~ ANAHEIM CITY PIANNiNG COMMISSION
AMENUING CERTAIN CdNDiTIC)N3 OF API~ROVAL OF
R~SaLUTIaN Np, PC94-45 ADOW'~~D IN CONNEC'TiON WITH
CONDITION~L USE PERMIT N0. 3670
WHEREAS, on A{~ril 4, 1994 the P{anning Comm(sslon apprnved Conditional Use Permit No.
3670 for a poriod af one year undc~r Resol~Rion Na. PC~4-45 to pArmft on-promises sal~ and consumption
Af aicohollc: bever~ges within an existing restaurant/bflliard cent~r wfth mu~ical ontortainment un praperty
located on the Aast side of Boach Boulevard, appro:: nately 1,050 foet north of 4he ~enterline of Lincaln
Avenue, and furthor d8scribed as 31a Nortt~ B~ach Boufevard (form~riy Tha Eleatric ~ircu~), and that no
f:irther action was taken by the Cfty ~ouncil, and
WI-IEREAS, I~o~olutlon Na. P~9a-~15, adopted in ~connection with subJect uss permft, ln~I~cSes
the following condftlons of approvai:
~, 7ha4 this condftlonal use permit shall expire one (1) yaar f~orn the date of t6~ls
r~soli.ition; pravided, howaver, that th~~ concJitfon may be amend~ci or doleted upan
request by the petftioner In canjunction with a future public hoaring.
a. That the operatar shail not chargA an admittanae fee prior to 9:00 p.m.
5. 'fhat ra minimum af two (2) uniformod and IicensEd security ofiicers, performfng
security dutios exclusEvely, shall be present fo monitor activitiss both insida the
restaurant and in :he parking lut during ail livo ~~rformances.
~. 'That subj~,ct property shali be daveloned substantially in accordanao with plang and
spocEfications submit~ed to the ~ity of Anaheim by the petition~r ~nci which plans
~re or~ file with the Planniny Departmant marked ~xhibit Nos. 1 anci 2.
14, That there shall bo no bar or loun~e area upon the licensed pran ~.~ ^s maintafned
far the purpose o~ sal~, servica or consumption af alcohulic b~ve, ,.~s directly to
patrons for consumption.
1 g, That the r~ppilcar~t shall pay the cosi of Code Enfarcemern Qivision inspections for
a rna:imum oF ance a wsek during the flrsc sixty (SO) days of ~peration aru! once
a month ther~aiter.
WH~R~AS, the petitioner r~quests the following amendments to sa(ci conditiQn af approval:
(A) DeletQ or am~nd Condltion Nn. 1 to pQrmit the cantinue~ aper~tion of a restaurant/biiliard center wfth
an-premisa sale and ~onsumption of aicoholic beverages and II~e entei~tafnment;
(B) Amend Condition No. 5 to eliminate the raquiremc~nt fnr ijnflormod security for I~ve perft~rmanaes which
Involvo a 'disc jockey' only;
(C) DeletEon of Condftion No.14 (n Its r~ntirety to pemnit Ratrons whose primary pt~rpose is to play b~ill~~s,
sar.lali~e or dancg to purchas~ an alcoholla b~ver~ge witho~~t having to purchase a fut! meal or occupy a
table ••vithin the restaurant pArtian of the facllity; and
(p) Amend Condriion No. 18 to r~duce the numb~r of coda enfarcem~nt inspectlons to na ms~ro than
three (3) (nspections during the first sfxty ~6U) days af ope~tEon and none iher~fter.
C~2382DM.WP -~- ~~:95-5a
~ ~.
~
WhIER~AS, the Cfcy Planninc~ CommissSon did hold a publlc hoaring at tho Civic Center in
tha City of Anaheim on May 1, 1995, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearin~ h~aving beon duly given
Chaptnr 18.A3
as required by law and in accardance with the provisfons of the Anahei~r~ Municipal Code, ~
to hear and conslder ev{dence for ann~Ct~lonnthe ewithr and ~t said public hearing wa~ c~ntinued othe
f(ndings and ~acommandatluns in co
May 31, 1995 Planning Commissiun meeting;
WHERCAS, sald Commi ~~on of all evidenc ~nnid r portstoffered at aaid hea ng, doe3 Ind
~nd in it~ behall, and aknr due conside
anci determine tho followin~ fac4s:
1. That said permiE is beingli~ e~ace~ he~~lth, safety a.nd ge ereitwelf~ree pArticular ~r~~ and
surrounding land uses, nar ta the pub p
2. 7he praposed uss, as arnonded, !s a proper use fnr which a conditional ugo permft is
autr~arized.
3. Th~ praposed use, as col~d ~ u°~ ~~pr ta the peace,~heolth,rsafety~c~nd genor~l~welfar~~ of
to the particular area and surrounding
the surrounding community.
4. 1'hat a one-y4ar time lirr~itatfon will gtve the Commisslon an ~pportunity to rAView the activfty
associated witl~ the use, as amendeci.
5. That na one ~ndi~r~.aQOd os(tian to 4he subject ipetpituonc hearing in oppositlon; and thot no
cnrrespondenca was rACeived pp
c`n,~ IFQRNIA EN IF~ M NT t ini ~~ AGl' FINDIN~. T{~at th~ Anahefm City Pia~nning
Commission t~~s r~viewed the propoWed ~ondil on~iSUsg Permit Na. 3670 i~aadequ te to se~rve~ astthe
previously r~pproved in connection
requlred environmental document~tion in connectlan with thls roquest upon finding that the declarati~n
reflects the independ~nt jud~oment of the le3d agenc,y and that iY has considRred the Negative Declaratlon
4o~~ther with any comments ~eceivled dQ~rl~rig~Thi~~~ b~ere is na s bstant al ev dencefi4hat, he p oJec.btawifl
o f t l~ e i n i t i a l s t u c i y a n d a n y c o m m e
have a signifir„ant Qffect on the Qnviranment.
NOW, THEREFARE, 8E IT R~SOLVED thai the Anahelm Clty Planning Commission does
hereby amend Condition No~. t, 3, 5, 6 and 18 of Resolution No. PC94•~SS to read a~ follows:
1. That tnls condit4onal usv permft shall oxpire arae (1) yoar from the date of this ~esolutfan, on
May 1, 1996.
3, That patrons a~~~ ~n~~r~ora ain iadmittan~e t han'y p rtion of ths stablishmentr Ghar{~s or
admittance feo 0 9
erformin 3ecurity
5. That a minimum of two (2) uniformed and I(censed s~curity offfcer~, p ~
duties excfusiv~iy, sh~li be~p ~ gu(P~ by thetAnaholm iPolice~Departrnont ~~Staurant and
out,i~e iri the parking lot, a q
6, 7het subject propercy shafl be developed substantl~lly in acaorciance with pfar~s and
specificatlons submitted to the ~it~ of Anahoirn by the petftioner and whfeh plans ara un ~le
wRh the Plannin~ Dapartment markod Revision No. 1 of Exhibit Nos. 1 and ?..
.2~ PC95-57
~,'
~i
1 a. 7hat the applicarrt shall pay the cost of Code Enforcement Dluision inspectlons as required
by Code EnfarcE~ment staff.
and, that the Pla~ntng Commi:;sion adds tt~a follnwing new eanditions:
20. That the business owner shalf bfl r~sponsi~:le far malntainlny tho apprn~riate number of occt,~pants
in tha building. Whon the ~ccupant IaacJ reaches sovent~ flve porc~ni (~5°6) or more 4han tha p~~tad
maximum occupent ioad,,th at p~ belowithe posted amoun ith counting de~rlces at each entrance to
ma(ntain the occupant lo ~d
2i, That prior ta commonceme'~ f~r 4 Conditita rNo.i6, abave-~mentionied, shaN be camipl~isdnwlth.ni~g
inspecttons, whlchever oacu s ,
AND PUC~THER BE IT RESOLVED that the An~heim Planning Commis~fon doos horaby deny tho
request to aeletA Conditinn No. 14.
THE ~OFlE~OIt~G RE~OLU'1'IOt~ w~g ad pted at tho Planning Corramission meetir~g of
May 31, 1 y95. ~~,~~ • fJ , y~~~~
i~.,.d/ G~...~.'l• -
HAIRW MAN, ANAHEIM CI7Y PI.A NING COMMIS510N
ATTES7:
. ,
~~_.._..._
SEC'R ARY, NA{-ICIM CI'fY PLANNING CAMNIISSION
STA'fE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY ~F ORANGE ) ss•
CITY OF ANANEIM )
I, Margarita Solo~io, ~ecretary of the AnahAim Clty Planning Commisslon, do her~by c~~tify
that tho foregofn~ resolution W~~ b s~he foliowing vota of the membors t{~ereof:n~heim Clty Planning
Commission held on May 31, 1995, y
p~y~~; COMNIISSI~NERS: OSS I P~,R~ STUN, CALDWELL, HENNINGER, MAYER,
NAES: COMI+AI~SIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONCRS: NQN~
~---.
IN WITNESS WHER~OF, i have hereuntr~ sst my hand this _~__ day of ____,,,,_~~
1995.
~ ~,,~ c~~~~-
SECRE7ARY, AWEIM C17Y LAp NNIN~ COMIIA1SSl0N
.~~ PCJ5-57